Your argument is fallacious. Prioritisation is rational only if there is one action contingent on the other, otherwise it is irrational. Your argument to only discuss the legitimacy of females performing athan after the liberation of al-Aqsa is irrational as the performance of athan is not contingent upon liberation of al-Aqsa, therefore the prioritisation makes no sense. As for the core issue, I believe there is no problem in women saying anything praiseworthy athan or quran or otherwise, however the question is whether the performance of athan by a woman would count or not. If it is not mandated by scripture then a female athan would be inconsequential and still require a man to perform the athan to fulfill the communal duty.
Why would it not count over the Athan of a male? There is no such thing in the Qur'an. The Athan of a male is not "mandated by scripture" over a woman's. Did you even watch the video? Also, your first argument is pretentious. You know exactly what the Sheikh is trying to say but let me make it easier for you. The focus on minuscule and pathetic issues such as women's hair or "is music haraam" over actual issues of importance such as the liberation of Al-Aasa (or the abuse of women and children by mullahs, the lack of progression in the Muslim world in terms of medicine/science/human rights, the amount of ex-Muslims who've left Islam because of having Islam forced on them or misogyny etc) is a matter of prioritisation, or rather, lack thereof. What are those weirdo dawah males talking about when they're running around on the streets in Britain? Have they managed to help the Muslim world progress?
Amazing! If I could give this a hundred likes then I would.
Amazing video sheikh بارك الله فيك I wish more people would listen, the Usuli institute is extremely underrated
Could someone write the names of the female Quran reciters?? Or links to some of their recitations on CZcams?
Your argument is fallacious. Prioritisation is rational only if there is one action contingent on the other, otherwise it is irrational.
Your argument to only discuss the legitimacy of females performing athan after the liberation of al-Aqsa is irrational as the performance of athan is not contingent upon liberation of al-Aqsa, therefore the prioritisation makes no sense.
As for the core issue, I believe there is no problem in women saying anything praiseworthy athan or quran or otherwise, however the question is whether the performance of athan by a woman would count or not. If it is not mandated by scripture then a female athan would be inconsequential and still require a man to perform the athan to fulfill the communal duty.
You didn't listen to the end. He provides a view also.
Why would it not count over the Athan of a male? There is no such thing in the Qur'an. The Athan of a male is not "mandated by scripture" over a woman's. Did you even watch the video?
Also, your first argument is pretentious. You know exactly what the Sheikh is trying to say but let me make it easier for you. The focus on minuscule and pathetic issues such as women's hair or "is music haraam" over actual issues of importance such as the liberation of Al-Aasa (or the abuse of women and children by mullahs, the lack of progression in the Muslim world in terms of medicine/science/human rights, the amount of ex-Muslims who've left Islam because of having Islam forced on them or misogyny etc) is a matter of prioritisation, or rather, lack thereof.
What are those weirdo dawah males talking about when they're running around on the streets in Britain? Have they managed to help the Muslim world progress?