Nova C (IM-1) Lands on the Moon
Vložit
- čas přidán 21. 02. 2024
- First of at least 3 robotic lunar landing missions by Intuitive Machines as part of NASA's Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) Program. The lunar lander, named Odysseus, will fly 6 payloads for NASA and several others for commercial companies to near Malapert. A crater near the Moon's south pole.
The landing is currently scheduled for 6:24 p.m. EST.
Forum link: forum.nasaspaceflight.com/ind...
⚡ Become a member of NASASpaceflight's channel for exclusive discord access, fast turnaround clips, and other exclusive benefits. Your support helps us continue our 24/7 coverage. ⚡
🔍 If you are interested in using footage captured by this stream, please review our content use policy: www.nasaspaceflight.com/conte... - Věda a technologie
UPDATE: "After troubleshooting communications, flight controllers have confirmed Odysseus is upright and starting to send data. Right now, we are working to downlink the first images from the lunar surface."
Yaaaay!
Fantastic
What soundstage is NASA using to set this landing up in?
@@merkridge8780 the moon. They built it back in the 60's
wow images.... meanwhile my iphone can transmit crystal clear video. they couldn't sacrifice 22 grams for a video device? what an absolute joke. im literally angry.,
Thanks NSF team, great stream. I hope they can improve the communication with the craft at some point 🤞.
UPDATE on the UPDATE: Initial reports were that the lander was upright, but it wasn't. It apparently had too much horizontal velocity when it touched down, and tripped. So now it's sideways. Many of the mission objectives can still be carried out, but not all. In particular, the rover is trapped.
Great stream NSF! Keep up the great work!
I'd like to see the actual footage of the craft approaching and landing on the moon instead of all the cgi we get.
Good presentation to the NSF team and congratulations to the Odysseus team on their achievement
Cool, I guess. But it is a bummer that they have already prepared nice visualizations based on real time telemetry (55:05) but then have chosen to not show this except for a few moments. I think it is important to show as much interesting data as possible, to allow the public to see what is actually happening and to encourage kids to study science and engineering.
This is a NASA sponsored project, after all. NASA's existence depends on public perception of their missions.
Agreed.
NASA
Never
A
Straight
Answer
Great stuff. Bravo everyone !
Even with AI, computing technology & telemetry as it is these days, this shows the difference between robotics & manned flight. The instructions have been published in the 60's, yet humanity still can't land reliably.
Bummer for IM. We are spoiled by SpaceX - we want real time 4K video! I love how the Japanese lander tossed out some camera bots just before it landed so we could get pics.
I’ve read a camera was dropped to film this landing, but it does not stream. All video needs to be downloaded. Remember spacex streams are just a handful of miles above us. The moon is VERY far away.
This lander did the same. Hopefully we'll get photos from it soon. - Das
@@NASASpaceflight We have communications! Lander is upright and sending data!
SpaceX has never sent real time 4K video from the Moon. They have ships/cameras with tons of power either in the atmosphere or LEO. This is a whole different situation.
Why satelites will be put in moons orbits to send data from the moon it'll happen then maybe we'll get Live moon streams
solar panels to run cams etc sunny side not the darkside Luke oh no
thanks for the stream even though i watched later
Merci!
NFS, y'all rock!
Congratulations, visionary investment in the resurch & development sector
By far ISRO had the best telemetry and live animation of the landing of CH-3( Vikram lander) 🇮🇳🇮🇳
wohoo!!!! not quite living during the Apollo era yet but getting close to that feeling
inedeed I'm so excited!
I wish the all in podcast had this kind of cool intro music
This is why you have Moon Landing Skeptics ... 50 years ago with primitive tech we landed on the moon, and now we can land a shoebox.
Wow! Big feet! 😳
Nah, we have moon skeptics because we have idiots.
Also, because it is very expensive & all the Engineering knowledge largely retired/dead and has to be relearnt etc etc.
@@iRosscoit's mostly the idiots.
This thing is four meters tall.
@@iRosscogreat story. Tell it again so the people who haven’t heard it think it’s true. 😂😂😂
Will there be any live videos from the lunar surface?
dude, wake up, its all scripted, you cant land on moon
Having watched Apollo 11 land , this brings renewed feelings that yes we have the right stuff. I’m happy for all of these other countries having successful landings , but the feelings are the same as it is for the U S landing . Keep up the good work .
I concur. I'm surprised that I felt emotional with the successful announcement so I guess it takes us back hey? I wasn't expecting to feel anything being an unmanned mission.
I was in grade 3 for Apollo 11 and still remember it. From a small town Rockhampton, Australia sometime after the launch looking up I excitedly said to my teacher I think I saw the rocket trail, likely a high jet vapour trail, hahaha. I got to see up close the Command Capsule later when it toured Australia. Ultimately became a Mechanical Engineer perhaps as a result of the USA Apollo program.
@NASASpaceFlight, Nice job catching the ISS in front of the moon at 1:57:23! Great coverage, as always!
What a freakin eye you have. I'm not sure if that was the ISS though...👽
that shows up multiple times throughout the stream and the iss was not near where that was filmed, i have literally no idea what it could be lol
edit: it also requires an insane amount of preparing to capture the iss transiting the moon, you gotta find the right spot and stuff (kinda easy with a website) and the chances of it happening during a 2 hour stream with no preparation is extremely low
The international space station is only approximately 250 miles out from the Earth surface. Low earth orbit is only between 900 and1200 miles.
You're probably right, it might just be a satellite... Still cool though...
@@billywayne902 LEO is anything up to 1200 miles. 250 certainly counts.
Felicitacion! Successful moon landing!
What a blast, this is all out MOON
its fake, you cant land on moon, its plasma
At just after 29:00, I'm now wondering how many people think that the UK still has "traditional blue police boxes" 🙂
I hope it is not another 50 years of (Did they really land on the moon?)
Landing a craft and “landing with people” are two complete different complex missions.
Congratulations to Intuitive Machines to become the first commercial lander and first lander with cryogenic prop to land on the Moon, and first US lander to land on there in 52 years. This was truly THE historic moment to watch and thank you NSF for streaming that! As IM would say - “We’re not dead yet”
Is that the lift off camera still tracking at 42:14?
I think they never considered the dust raised during landing would affect communications.
That's exactly what I was thinking
@ChrisWalker re PARKES RESCUE ...Don't worry mate, at least us older Aussies know what you mean! I visited 'The DISH', (the HUGE radio telescope near Parkes, Australia) it's awesome, especially when surrounding golden canola fields are in full bloom! (Guys refer movie "The Dish" with Sam Neil about it televising the Apollo landing.)
NASA trying to take credit for a private commercial success.
They are not. They only appreciated and gave their blessings.
wow
I'd like to see the actual footage of the craft approaching and landing on the moon instead of all the cgi we get.
There was no actual footage? I was skimming through trying to find the actual landing. Please tell me there is actual footage in this live stream.
@@oscarruiz-pr8rc there isnt, but they should have some footage of it landing which they'll release sometime soon (if everything worked out)
@@uflocblah blah blah. It’s fake
Telemetry? Photos? Anything??
Well we’re waiting
Why wouldn't there be a live video footage?
Do we know if it’s upright?
We do now, yes. They have restored communications.
Where's the footage of the landed probe by the separated Eagle cam?
It has to be relayed through the lander. A tiny probe like that cannot carry a big enough antenna to send an intelligible signal all the way back to Earth. Even relaying through the lander would not have been instantaneous in nominal conditions, as it is, the lander is on its side and communications are compromised.
@@odysseusrex5908 Don't be silly mate! They did it live back in 1969, supposedly! We got to see more back then than we did 55 years later! Laughable really, isn't it!🤣🤣🤣🤣🙄
@@boltingskyline5234 You didn't even understand what I said, you haven't got any idea of the difference in the equipment this lander is using vs what Apollo used, and you also don't know that, ultimately, they decided not to deploy Eagle Cam for reasons related to the LIDAR failure.
Is there anyone else getting a vibe that this is their first time landing on the moon
It is certainly Intuitive Machines' first time.
For intuitive machines,yes...are you aware that it's not NASA but it's a private company.
@nasaspaceflight Have you ever tried to get an Interview with Buzz Aldrin, Jim Lovell, David Scott (Apollo 15), Charles Duke (Apollo 16), or Harrison Schmitt (Apollo 17) ?
Or any other Apollo astronauts ?
@@kitt44kt i don't think there are too many other Apollo astronauts.
Did the legs work?
i don't see any reason to be so excited... in 1969 two men with a LEM landed on the moon, that was exciting
In one sense, that was easier than today's attempt. We've learned that the men were frantically jockeying the lander to find a safe spot before the fuel ran out. The automated system today was apparently less capable.
Bro,manned missions are easier to land compared to automated ones
@@MLIOGJXNUYAT exactly..
OH YEEESSSS unfortunally without IA and computers and simulations russian lunakod landed more than 50 years ago. or we have to talk to viking missions or venera missions? everything ols school and with GOOD engineers. @@prakashm1468
in one senso lunakod landed safely more than 50 years ago. is a question of what are modern engineers and what quality job was done without IAb to decide for us. nowadays i see too many faliures, think about it@@MLIOGJXNUYAT
Great way to feed caviar to the conspiracy theorists!
it's as if NASA is working following this Bill Casey Quote from 1981:
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
gets kinda sus i'd say... 🤔
when will we get video from an orbiter of a moon landing?
We need a Starlink network around the moon for high speed internet for all our devices there. Mars too!
So is production getting better? Did that one mouse ever make off that space satalite safely?
So are you doing anything comparable to what they do? It's fine to criticize, but not in a condescending way. Do better
@@The_1ntern3t he looks more sensible by inquiring about the wellbeing of that poor mouse than you, being all rude and condescending like an '80s proverbial bureaucrat. mice have the right to go into space but not in those conditions and not without space adapted mice PPE. 🙄
@@The_1ntern3t I invented the pan tilt zoom surveillance system Back in the eighties. Gov't stole the rights and gave to lucent tech pat. filed before theirs Forss 1.
@kittytrail Space adapted mice MPE (M for mouse, of course 😁) should be mandatory. Totally agree!
@@karlstruhs3530 Can't help you with that, sorry. However, "pan tilt zoom" is literally moving a camera around. I'm not sure you can patent that
Curious if/ when a surface gravity measurement is taken/available? Seems important.
Why do you think so? No such instrument is on board, but what do you think its value would have been?
@@odysseusrex5908 Gravity is based on size and expansion not mass and attraction. The moon’s surface gravity should be @1/4 the earth’s- size based- yet the near side is @1/6th, so to get the 1/4 average the far side surface gravity measurement would be 1/3rd earth ‘s “g”. With variations at all different locations. The Chinese far side lander/craft surface measurement would be very useful/ important. Someone might/ would know: beyond my ability to find out. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics and CAUSE of gravity.
Algorithm...Algorithm...Algorithm... Love what you guys are doing.. Algorithm...
Hi,
Where on the moon it should land?
What is the main goal for this mission?
Several landings were done but not much came out of it.
Try listening...South Pole
joking for water at the bottom of craters.
I love the NSF intro. Congratulations on the touch down…
In 1966 a Surveyor lander did the same thing...What is the progress since 58 years ????? And at that time the computers were very basic....
Where r the pictures of the moon ?
Keep your shirt on, they'll come.
They haven’t created them yet.
@@godswill2260 +1
They have to edit them to remove the aliens.
@@daveanderson4778 lol funny but wouldn’t be surprised. Lots of editing on google earth too! ✝️
I assume that, it is upside down, semi-broken :I but landed.
Crazy gig. You've got insane money and time wrapped into this. Then get the world to watch it live😮
Tammy was yanking on the Hatch when it Landed
At @1:51:57 that yellow circle is just noise, doesn't look any more significant than the rest of the data. There are even higher peaks and deeper valleys outside the circle.
Congratulations my family this time I gone moon ❤❤❤❤❤
So can we see landing with Hubble telescope? Would be nice
Чему вас в школе учили?! Хаббл может рассмотреть на Луне только объекты больше 60 метров (200 футов), да и то в виде отдельной точки!
Hubble's resolution of the moon's surface is about 50m. Anything smaller than that is impossible to see due to the size of the telescope's mirror.
No way to bright for a super scope
@@markheller8646that's not the likely reason as could view during lunar night. Reason is above
would they bring starlink dish
Fallen over? Behind a rock? In a crater?
lol
At 1:23:16 it looks like someone is running towards the lander from top right. What is it? Try playing at .25x .... Only plays for about 3 seconds total and screen goes blank
@@robertamann9066 the shadow?
@@robertamann9066 The computer simulation included a shadow of the lander.
I am thinking pile of rubble.
No video? Apollo had video almost 60 years ago
Put humans back in the loop
In a few years, in a few years.
@@odysseusrex5908it’s been over 50. Stop just stop
@@godswill2260 I just realized i misread the OP. I thought it said, "Put humans back on the Moon." Anyway, what do you mean stop? The next manned landing should be by 2028. Far, far too late, but that is politics for you, and better late than never.
A funny thing happened before landing on the moon.🌖 AT&T
Looks like a supermarket trolley to me!
Not enough bandwidth for live landing ? Still after 50 plus years ? Love the moon video tho great job there. Looks like the death star.
How could there be no touchdown pic if the camera that shot it was seperated camera shot made of the lander. You expressed the fact that there was a separation camera shot of the lander. As it lands
Insufficient bandwidth for streaming from 250,000 miles away. The lander with the cameras wasn't transmitting those pics itself, they were relayed through the lander. The lander, as is now known, hit a rock and tipped over. It's antennas are not in an optimal configuration for data transmission. Transmission is going to be slow. Even if it had landed upright though, it was still not capable of giving instant imagery.
Wait 22 mintues, then wait 22 more.
it's the inflation. thanks to Putin of course. _of course._ 🤡🌝
I love how they simulate everything. Is it so had to slap some go pros all around the thing and watch the full voyage. We know weight isn't a problem now with space x.
21st century time to kick it in full gear.
India did stream a low frame rate video from their landing, so it is certainly doable, but not necessarily inexpensive. US companies that participate in this commercial moon lander program charge their customers in the neighborhood of $1M per kilogram of mass delivered to the Moon. And that is without any real-time data being sent to Earth. So if you want to add your own camera with your own transmitter, antenna and support systems, then with all the required permits and integration work it will cost at least in the multiple millions of dollars. Still worth it, I think, but unfortunately these companies operate on a very tight budget. NASA pays only half of their cost, and they have to get the rest from the investors and other customers.
Weird thing is my friend built one of the cameras on this thing. From what he was told, they were supposed to drop a cube sat (basically although it would land) prior to the lander. The cube sat had cameras on all its sides so it should have captured something. Although maybe they couldn't show it live. Hopefully that did happen and we'll get pics. Although I didn't hear it talked about at all
@@g-urts5518 Is that the Eagle camera they did talk about?
When will the video of the landing on the surface of the moon
Unless the payload comes out,I doubt it's possible. The lander is tilted. That is almost 70% problematic.
My question is, was it manned......No, why not. Thought we'd have built a base there, by now. Like in Space 1999.
Get some
Our grandparents landed multiple crews of humans on the Moon, yet this generation cannot even land a garbage can lander upright.
I recall that the western media bashed ISRO for the lack of information being relayed to people after chandrayaan 3 landing..
Parkes is not one of the dish.. its THE DISH!! Show some respect !! Lol
It has a native name now, Murriyang
It's the Parkes Radio telescope in my book. Aborigines had nothing to do with it.
@@aldunlop4622 Always have been, the new csiro administration is following the line of putting native lables on landmarks.
More Woke bullshit@@bils6434
@@aldunlop4622 Yeah, but I love the scene in *The Right Stuff* where the Aborigines are sitting around their campfire outside the dish while John Glenn flies overhead.
Yeah, cos that's how we talked to people on the Moon, using secret mumbo jumbo.@@odysseusrex5908
I still don’t understand how come, we don’t see a live streaming from the moon. All the technology has become available for this why don’t we have a live stream looking back from the moon to the Earth I don’t believe anything anymore anyway.
Because it's a total NASA scam
How come there’s no live feed from the moon
I think the technology was better in the sixties
This is not a NASA mission but a private company.
Did this thing land on the moon or not?
We had a phone call to moon from NIXON TO ASTRONAUTs we should be able to get a few good pictures and videos by Now Am I correct in assuming this ?
Well Artemis 1 streamed the whole mission...
Where you land in terms of being visible to earth and your position on the landing site make a difference to how your antennas work, and an uncrewed lander has fewer onboard troubleshooting options than when some can poke at things in person.
No
No, you do not understand the limited budget this project is operating on. Aside from the fact tat there was some kind of comm interruption just after landing, apparently fixed now, this lander has very low bandwidth.
@@odysseusrex590850 years later and we have cheaper and more unreliable tech. I smell bs
re: Moon upside down ...Oh yeah I couldn't work out why it looked different, it's upside down! (Also in Australia)
Could not they reorient the Hubble telescope to look at the Moon landing site.
If it's intuitive, maybe it feels like resting for a while.
I likk them freench friied pataters, uh, hm.
Another lander on the moon cant land within 500miles it will make dust that cuts into craft & suits
try to get sunlite landing area's not the darkside alot calculations goes into a landing
It was like watching paint dry. A total anti-climax. They didn't even show metrics, just a table with some people sitting around it.
"What's Next To The Moon" ?
It is easier to land on Uranus. Moon, Mars It is all programming. The engineering was done a long time ago. But good job.
Bet the moon feels like we are just throwing our space junk at it.
400,000 meters its suposed to be 300 ,000 miles
How many astronauts landed on the moon?
10.
12 men in total. No women yet. Maybe one day soon. The first was 1969, the last was in 1972.
@@ChristLink-Channeland yet no other country has gone despite major advancements. I call bs
why they show moon landing from Apollo
We have perfect communication with the Perseverance rover on Mars (closest distance to earth @ 35 million miles).. got live feed with obvious delay when landed...
Oddesseus @ 250,000 miles, no livefeed, no communication...
Hmmmmmmm
Nonsense, it is literally impossible to get Live feed from Mars.
Oh man I was so excited for today but def a let down with the lack of transparency from the lander team
Its going to be a shame if it selected a landing spot in radio shadow from the earth.
Where are all the flat earthers LOL.....
Mission is not a success in the truest sense, if no data is returned. They don’t even seem to have a clue how it landed.
When is man going to land on the moon do you think
1969.
At a guess, I'd say 1969.
You mean "again", of course. currently scheduled for 2026, but 2028 will not surprise me.
Never because it never happened. If we did in 1969 2024 should be a cakewalk. It’s all a lie
God the live chat was full of buffoons. Someone saying they had live feed of the moon landing in 1969 so where are the videos here? Um, the Apollo 11 FILM was processed months later, after it was returned to Earth.
Umm.. they did have live TV feed from the Apollo moon landing. I watched it, libe on TV when I was a kid. Not months later: live. Also, Apollo 1 never went to the moon: it never even left Earth! It burned on the launch pad, killing three astronauts.
Apollo 1 was a typo. Wrong, they did NOT have live feed of the landing. They deployed the television camera AFTER landing and sent live feed of Armstrong walking down the ladder. The landing footage was on film and processed back on Earth.@@ChristLink-Channel
@@ChristLink-Channelyou watched a show on tv. Proves nothing other than you believed it happened. And yet 50 years later , advanced tech and nobody has repeated it. C’mon man. People are so gullible
You seem to be missing the point. The original claim here was that there was no live transmission, only film that was processed and shown months latet. That is not correct, as I pointed out. The live transmission did, in fact, happen, in real time, not months later. The film cameras used by the astronauts were not movie cameras either: they were only still cameras. The film was brought back and the still images were widely published at the time, but the cameras theselves were left on the moon, to save weight.
No, you're missing the point. My comment was about people saying "we had live feed of the Apollo 11 landing in real time, so why not now", and as I have said repeatedly, there was no live feed of the landing. There WAS live feed of Armstrong coming down the LEM, after the landing, when the tv camera was deployed. There are images most us have seen of the landing, dust coming up etc, but that was NOT live, it was filmed and developed after the crew returned to Earth. Dunno why that's so hard to understand.@@ChristLink-Channel
It crashed on the Moon. But they are getting a signal. Lol
No, it didn't crash. Nobody said that. they had some comm problems. those have now been resolved,
@@odysseusrex5908 I called it. It tipped over. Meaning it crashed. Lol
@@robertmarlow7332 Seems to me if it's operating, it didn't crash. they are going to get most of the data out of it. I took your OP to mean it had crashed so the signals had to be fake.
Awesome!!! To be honest, with technology available it’s hard to understand how some kind of continuous photos have not been available! Is something wrong? Very poor narration of events. Really not much of anything…… come on guys even simulation is kind of old at this time, Let us see something. Seems very unprepared all together….so much more could have and should have happened during this decent not to mention during entire voyage. This is such an important happening …. So disappointing I think everyone expected so much more …. I hope it really worked.."my God😮
Who doesnt put a camera on something like this? Doesnt even need to be high res, just a 480p camera would be better than nothing. What year is it?
@moosemeus there is no internet in space, so a device could capture video (I'm betting they do have one). BUT they can't live stream back to earth! Who would be paying the broadband connection fee and month subscription for that? The antenna/dishes to send, transfer signal (possibly something like Starlink) from moon to earth, and then another huge dish to receive on Earth (though we do have these it's hard to get a big enough dish to point at a particular point)
Ok sorry about long long post.
Ad Astra 🚀
Ask a martian to check on it
Your first supposed stream of a new fuel and supposed privateer moon lander. Congrats I.M.