Kill Team Battle Report | Hive Fleet Vs Phobos Strike Team | Critical Ops
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 07. 2024
- Dice cam is LIVE!
I pilot a Phobos Strike Team against the Hive Fleet.
Tokens I use► www.etsy.com/listing/12388989...
Discord ► / discord
Twitter ► / kimerexprojekt
Twitch ► / kimerexprojekt
00:00 - Start
2:26 - Setup
4:39 - Turn 1
9:02 - Turn 1 Breakdown
9:33 - Turn 2
14:17 - Turn 2 Breakdown
15:05 - Turn 3
17:30 - Turn 3 Breakdown
18:19 - Final Score
#warhammer40k #gamesworkshop #battlereport - Hry
![PHOBOS MARINES vs. KROOT FARSTALKERS on BHETA-DECIMA [Kill Team Battle Report]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/lexE7voEuCc/mqdefault.jpg)
In my opinion your format for kill team battle reports is the best so far. Quick videos with an entire view of the board and all rolls that go into each decision made. Very nice.
Totally agree with the OP
So nice seeing Phobos being played! Great content:)
I would really enjoy a deep dive into the phobos faction from you guys. In this video alone you put into concept some moves I didn't consider that really elevated the team performance. Rievers are definitely going to be in my mind for more matches, plus the non reciprocal shooting plays with the marksman.
quickly becoming one of my favorite Battle report channel. I love the format and accuracy in displaying rules and explaining them quickly.
Just found your channel. Great work on the batrep format and I really enjoyed your style of reviewing the Archon team too. Thanks!
Just come across this channel. I like the concise format you've gone for. Got yourselves a new sub.
This is just great! Love the style of battle report, and I have a place in my heart for the Phobos.
Great voice over work, Evan.
I'm really enjoying your battle reports. Thank you!
Thank you for watching them.
Can't wait for the next bat rep. great show
Great job with the Phobos win! Reivers are definitely key to Makita the team work.
Nice to see the Phobos doing well!
great work, excited for more in the future. Let's see some Krieg!
Ok how did your friend paint that terinid. I need to know how he got that sparkling effect
Fantastic battle report!
Where does those lovely objective markers come from?
Over on Amazon
-Jucoci Objective Point Markers 6PCS Set Objective Marker Compatible with WH40k Wargame (Miniature Not Included) a.co/d/0k2EzcH
Awesome report! Is there achance we will see phobos team again soon? :)
Always. Holidays are shaping up to record a bunch of games we release over time.
@@KimerexProjekt thats perfect thank you very much. I need to learn them and main them :) Btw do you know when we should get balance notes for Kill Team? Is it regular or more random?
@@DodgethisCZ no set schedule, but usually 4 times a year. Should still have one left this year, but i don't know.
Where did you guys get that awesome terrain from?
It's Games Workshop terrain. I painted it.
Phobos Sergeant (any) must be more than 3" from any enemy operative - not sure if your's was in TP2
Also - a stealth assault charge cost 3AP (Guerilla Warfare to change into Engage, Charge, Fight) in total, unabling you to capture a point after.
The trick is with the wording between core rules for activation and the wording for stealth assault.
In core, it reads like after the unit is activated you choose the order to change to.
And Stealth is triggered when the activation happens.
It makes it sound like if the unit was in conceal as activation begins, the ability can be used before the order is determined.
The Designer Notes for the ability may lean it the other way.
Feels like a GW grey writing issue, but your way is probably right, since there is little reason to bring up the "charge from conceal" idea in the designer notes.
@@KimerexProjekt Even more so when you consider Spec Ops upgrades - one of them lets you Guerilla for 0AP and other Charge from conceal.
But yeah, GW and their legaleze rulewriting :/
Lol is that Marksman looking extremely nearsighted? Poor guy didn't see a charge attack coming.
Knew it was coming. Just assumed a point blank attack against a bug would be fine. The emperor's grace was not with him that day. lel.