We are listening just to 128 kbps compressed youtube audio so it is impossible to compare any of them since both sounds through digital compressed streaming.
@TheWutangclan1995 no, this guy doesn't know what he's talking about. Records still have valleys and groves to vibrate the needle to make music, not to mention they are mixed different from digital copies, they usually sounds warmer, more mellow compared to a cd or mp3 or hifi file
@@ODST_Republic Yep, technically, the sound from your turntable is produced through an analog mechanism, but what we hear is a "fake analog" because it comes from a digital recording. The case is the same as when you copy an mp3/hi-res file to a cassette tape, then play it. There is only sound colorizing. I think it's a wasteful to copy a digital music onto vinyl as to copy it to cassette tape. Try looking for vinyl produced from under the 70s (where there was no pcm encoder/digital recording yet), you will know the difference.
Analog playback even on a digital recording is going to be different and in my opinion better. Because a stylus and cartridge is more like a natural instrument with internal vibrations all lending to a more natural sound. Think of a guitar string vibrating in 3 dimensions instead of 2.
What I love when I play records is the output potency, sounds powerful even on a lower volume but digital sounds a little muffed like and weak so I always turn the volume much higher
We are listening just to 128 kbps compressed youtube audio so it is impossible to compare any of them since both sounds through digital compressed streaming.
1. CZcams compression will ruin the comparison regardless. To really compare this, you'd have to record it directly into your computer's line in jack and provide WAV files in the description. 2. Your ATLP60X is playing too fast. Re-adjust the 33 1/3 RPM speed and then compare again. 3. Modern music is made from a DAW, so the audio quality is only gonna be as good as the master audio file outputted by that DAW. Still, I wouldn't doubt that a record would sound miles better than Spotify's free streaming or even CZcams. Trust me, I've been into music and audio since I was 10, I know what I'm talking about.
I'd say it's brighter and more shallow, not really soft nor gentle. Listening through an anker soundcore2, i know it's not much but it's honest work (and better than any phone speaker)
you do know that this is the worst comparison ever since its recorded through your phone mic, and most vinyl records have been digital since the early 80s.
Analog playback even on a digital recording is going to be different and in my opinion better. Because a stylus and cartridge is my like a natural instrument with internal vibrations frequency all lend to a more natural sound. Think of a guitar string vibrating in 3 dimensions instead of 2.
I mean you're comparing it to a 192kps compressed rip on CZcams. Should have compared it to the highest quality available Although finding lossless audio is difficult, it would be a closer reference
@@philipsfanboy6423Man people ruin the fun of music. Just listen to it. That turn table is literally a 3rd the price of a used car and is an audio technica. Has 4.6 stars with 50000 purchases on amazon not including their site. It is a perfectly fine turntable. Please stop being gatekeeping. GGatekeepers ruin vinyl.
Good start, but really what you are trying to say is, that the highly compressed, youtube version of that record sounds like rubbish compared to the vinyl version you have. Get the vinyl master on to a CD and it will sound identical if not better.
@@PM-wt3ye Ultimately yes. Totally get he vinyl listening experience and I have way too many records to pretend I don't love it, but I am also quick to admit the CD is a vastly superior technology than vinyl.
@joelfrombethlehem - either a MC or MM is capable of being quieter. In some cases, the needle is shaped in a way that can go deeper into the vinyl groove, thus further down past the “surface noise” where a lot of pops and crackling happens. Going deeper in the groove also retrieves more sonic information.
if you are limited by space then you will not be able to hear soundstage with your current set up. Speaker too close to each other, and it is flushed to the wall. The sound is 2 dimensional. Put the speakers 2 meters apart, and half a meter from the backwall, and you'll hear the difference. It's a huge upgrade and it's free.
No it won't lol. CD = DAC. I have a bad ass DAC and sorry vinyl beats 192khz 24bit all day. So CDs just can't hang and why I see them in the biggest trouble. Vinyl sounds different and better so there is a reason to buy. CDs just stream and save money........ lol
Only costs more if you buy the absolute cheapest low end record player you can find 🙏 But a nice turntable will cost a whole lot more 💵 And doesn't come with built in speakers and amplifier
Hands Down with the proper sound system the vinyl WILL always prevail... Vinyl is true sound on a true system. You have not heard the vinyls true sound?
you tested it on youtube though which is very low quality audio should test with high bit rate file or CD but also the record probably sounded worse because- i didnt see a receiver which means ur probably using powered speakers which dont have the best amp for vinyl records- so in the end- i couldnt hear the difference on my phone and even if it was in person id still find something to complain about i guess
I’m not going to get into while this whole thing won’t work. Just a few tips get your speaker’s farther apart so they can try and generate a stereo field. Try and place them near ear level to where you will be when listening to them. Finally get them pulled out away from the wall and play with toeing them in to various angles to find what sounds best in your space.
Funny thing is that vinyl record has been recorded digitally then has been Put on to the vinyl so it’s not a true analog vinyl sound a true analog vinyl sound can only be found from When vinyls were first made to about the late 1990s Mid90s So all these new vinyls from 2000 and up aren’t true analog sound it’s all been copied from a digital sound and copied to a vinyl
@GrahmDahleSelfMade - You’re misinformed. There are record companies like Analog Productions who are using master tapes or good tape sources to press vinyl without digital steps. From thier website: Analogue Productions audio mastering for its reissued albums is done using only the original analogue master tapes, hence the name of the label. Analogue Productions LP reissues feature thicker grade vinyl pressed at 180 grams weight or better, making for superior audiophile reproduction.
@@cirenosnor5768 ya but where in the hell are people gonna get that shit If they do that they need to make all of them like that Instead of someone goin to Walmart and finding a vinyl and it sounds like ass because it’s been remastered and they take all they dynamics out of the song and make it all equally loud
I collect high speed tape and LPs. Yes LP is crisper and clearer.. they admit Cds took a hit on the sound clarity to get fast sales and get it out faster..
@globaldeception7414 - I don’t think “crisper and clearer” are major virtues of vinyl compared to digital. If anything, the turntables most are using is *less* crisp and a has a softer sound. As some have mentioned here. I think better vinyl and turntables do however have more ambiance and a bigger soundstage. Nobody ever seems to talk about those things
I have a Celine Dion vinyl that I bought 10 years ago haha and I barely played it because i didnt own a record player, I can probably count the times played with my fingers yet still it has a lot of stuttering and has very pronounced jumps, I dont get it, not the best for preservation 😢
I ran this test same via Bjork, Pink Floyd, Hooverphonic and Hendrix…. My Formats= ITunes, modern vinyl, vintage vinyl, and CD. (Hendrix is what I knew in my bones) So I hyper focused on that being that I’ve even heard Band of Gypsy’s on reel-to-reel. My conclusion = Vintage vinyl much to my shock actually sounds better than Mod…. But the BS that comes with it is NOT worth the tiny difference unless you are obsessive AF and have more money than brains. Mod vinyl sounds better than CD….. But again, unless you just enjoy the ritual… not really worth it. I’m not sure what’s happening with the world today, perhaps life is so complicated we are reverting back to simpler times “VHS, Laser Disk, vintage video games… all coming back again !?!” vinyl is a great option for not only ritualistic endeavors, but also a great outlet for inner-self-expression. However, at the end of the day unless you are talking about ultra-complex sounds (No offense, Eminem would be a super shitty example compared to say…Frédéric Chopin, or even Rush) It is from a logical stand point a huge waste of time and money in regards to “sounds better” unless you are into nostalgia for nostalgias sake I’d suggest playing it safe and getting your music in the least-pain-in-the-ass-way as possible. In these trying times…. Nothing really sounds better than saving money where you can.
Problem is current "modern" Vynils are made from Digital Master recordings, so, traditional Vynil Quality was never there... "Old" Vynils sounded better because they were made using Tape-Master recordings (an analog to analog conversion, avoiding sound frequency losses due to compression / encription)
You have digital recording since 1970, and it has been better than analog forever. So many Vinyl is either from digital master or even digital overall, but this doesnt made it bad at all. If you're over 30 you maby not even be able to hear 16kHz, but you're complaining about cut-off at 20kHz? There also is something called lossless compression but you, of course, can hear this too, on a 1000k$ HiFi system, can't you?! xD
Thats what i want so say - you can hear those differneces EVEN on a hifi system that costs as little as 1000k$...I was sarcastic about your golden hearing. WHEN do i start hear thoese miniscule differences, 10k, 20k, 50k?? How many people who are listening to music even have a 1000$ System, 5%? How many do have a 3k system, 1%? 10k 0,01%... Maybe 50 years age you had to buy expensive stuff, today you can hear really music very nicely on a 1k$ system with 50$ worth of cables. @@radiux_sv
@radiux_sv - At least learn to spell vinyl - lol. For the record, there’s no such word as “vinyls” - this word has been used so much by a younger generation that people think it is in fact a word. It isn’t There *are* new vinyl pressings…not new vinyls….that *are* using analog tape as the source. Visit Analog Productions
Digital music is compressed for saving server space and or making smaller files before streaming was popular. Vinyl is a full rich uncompressed sound. I used to dj when i was 15 in the 90s. I am 41 now. I have heard music on most mediums old and new.
Thats BS and you probably know it. Many songs (after 1970) that exist on vinyl are recorded digitally, or at least mastered digitally, before pressed on vinly. You know what you hear on vinyl? Distortion, cracks, clicks and so on but of course this sounds great
@PM-wt3ye - Also can hear a better sense of ambiance, bigger soundstage, etc with the level of vinyl playback most have never heard and seem a waste of money… nobody talks about that and they probably can’t. I don’t know what recordings you speak of but in the 70’s, seems most rock/pop/R&B recordings were still analog.
Look... There's NO justice with your system.... The sounds system sucks? Itty bitty speakers.....What an embarrassment. You are definitely NOT getting the full sound of the vinyl. You obviously don't know much about music.. That's free info at no charge. ENOUGH SAID!!!
Ish get a better record player and someone that can do a pro calibration of the cartridge Add a separate phono stage and it will blow away the Digital Comparing apples to lemons is not a good comparison kid!
We are listening just to 128 kbps compressed youtube audio so it is impossible to compare any of them since both sounds through digital compressed streaming.
@agustinmireles5817 - Vinyl is not for hip hop? That seems debatable since hip hop was originally played by DJ’s who used turntables? Thus production and mastering for hip hop took that into consideration even after CD’s became more prominent?
No, we can't tell the difference over your phone.🙄
We are listening just to 128 kbps compressed youtube audio so it is impossible to compare any of them since both sounds through digital compressed streaming.
well i can,somehow..
😅
@@philosophiaentis5612 lol. i love that you had to explain that.
I agree! Waste of time if levels aren't matched!
You should have make comparison against Compact Disc and test them on a true HiFi/Stereo system.
Both is digital. Vinyl on this day is just a fcking fake analog because it have record on a digital medium first, then copy to your vinyl😅
It was recorded digitally, but that's not how that works 😂
So basically people are just buying a jumbo cd.
@TheWutangclan1995 no, this guy doesn't know what he's talking about. Records still have valleys and groves to vibrate the needle to make music, not to mention they are mixed different from digital copies, they usually sounds warmer, more mellow compared to a cd or mp3 or hifi file
@@ODST_Republic Yep, technically, the sound from your turntable is produced through an analog mechanism, but what we hear is a "fake analog" because it comes from a digital recording. The case is the same as when you copy an mp3/hi-res file to a cassette tape, then play it. There is only sound colorizing.
I think it's a wasteful to copy a digital music onto vinyl as to copy it to cassette tape.
Try looking for vinyl produced from under the 70s (where there was no pcm encoder/digital recording yet), you will know the difference.
Analog playback even on a digital recording is going to be different and in my opinion better. Because a stylus and cartridge is more like a natural instrument with internal vibrations all lending to a more natural sound. Think of a guitar string vibrating in 3 dimensions instead of 2.
I can’t tell the difference on my phone but it seems like the Vinyl sounds better
What I love when I play records is the output potency, sounds powerful even on a lower volume but digital sounds a little muffed like and weak so I always turn the volume much higher
I have noticed this as well
I can tell the difference between them and its huge.
😂😂 Poser
Smoother, clearer and a little louder with vinyl. The bass doesn’t sound as rough and sounds like it has less treble
We are listening just to 128 kbps compressed youtube audio so it is impossible to compare any of them since both sounds through digital compressed streaming.
I mean they're equally compressed, you can still tell a difference
Huge difference in clarity. The digital version is so muddy.
1. CZcams compression will ruin the comparison regardless. To really compare this, you'd have to record it directly into your computer's line in jack and provide WAV files in the description.
2. Your ATLP60X is playing too fast. Re-adjust the 33 1/3 RPM speed and then compare again.
3. Modern music is made from a DAW, so the audio quality is only gonna be as good as the master audio file outputted by that DAW. Still, I wouldn't doubt that a record would sound miles better than Spotify's free streaming or even CZcams.
Trust me, I've been into music and audio since I was 10, I know what I'm talking about.
What do you mean with "a record"? Everything is "a record". But you know what you're talking about?! XD
mastering can be different between vinyl and digital
More soft, gentle sound on vynil!
I'd say it's brighter and more shallow, not really soft nor gentle.
Listening through an anker soundcore2, i know it's not much but it's honest work (and better than any phone speaker)
Buddy don’t use CZcams 🤣
So many factors here. My vinyl rig would shit on any digital source
@budsmoker4201120 - What’s your vinyl rig?
Doubt it.
RT85 with a 2m Bronze running through an IFI phonostage in to an R-N1000A
With that vinyl sounds alot better than digital. I can stream digital all day long and it is fine, but nothing beats vinyl playback to my ears.
Even with the built phonostage on the reciever sounds better
you do know that this is the worst comparison ever since its recorded through your phone mic, and most vinyl records have been digital since the early 80s.
Vinyl sounds smoother
Is the question really if youtube has worse quality than vinyl, cd, hi res streaming...? :D
the best vinyl detail
I can totally hear the difference
Analog playback even on a digital recording is going to be different and in my opinion better. Because a stylus and cartridge is my like a natural instrument with internal vibrations frequency all lend to a more natural sound. Think of a guitar string vibrating in 3 dimensions instead of 2.
There is a big difference (for a phone) but youtube quality is actually terrible
I mean you're comparing it to a 192kps compressed rip on CZcams.
Should have compared it to the highest quality available
Although finding lossless audio is difficult, it would be a closer reference
It’s no unfair comparison as he’s using a cheap turntable with a cheap cartridge.
@@philipsfanboy6423Man people ruin the fun of music. Just listen to it. That turn table is literally a 3rd the price of a used car and is an audio technica. Has 4.6 stars with 50000 purchases on amazon not including their site. It is a perfectly fine turntable. Please stop being gatekeeping. GGatekeepers ruin vinyl.
Apple Music has it free
Getting lossless music is not hard lol
@@Haydosqobuz deezer hifi, amazon music, apple music and tidal are lossless
Good start, but really what you are trying to say is, that the highly compressed, youtube version of that record sounds like rubbish compared to the vinyl version you have. Get the vinyl master on to a CD and it will sound identical if not better.
Or only get the master, wich is (even on vinyl) digital nevertheless, same as on cd, it probably is all the same.
@@PM-wt3ye Ultimately yes. Totally get he vinyl listening experience and I have way too many records to pretend I don't love it, but I am also quick to admit the CD is a vastly superior technology than vinyl.
@pmuppuehtemulov - Vastly superior? What turntables have you heard? Both formats have thier advantages
@@cirenosnor5768 as far as the quality of audio absolutely. well let me clarify, the potential to be. depending on the original source material.
The vinyl is cut from the digital file
Your spending hundreds of dollars for the music BUT it's the system that's hurting for the upgrade... Rookie!!!!!
Is the cartridge Moving Magnet (MM) or Moving Coil (MC) or ceramic (CER)?
@joelfrombethlehem - either a MC or MM is capable of being quieter. In some cases, the needle is shaped in a way that can go deeper into the vinyl groove, thus further down past the “surface noise” where a lot of pops and crackling happens. Going deeper in the groove also retrieves more sonic information.
Well it sounds sharper but that can be settings
I want to know how nobody seems to have pop and crackles but every vinyl I buy new or used has a lot of surface noise.
@arabidbuffalo2872 - Some of the pops and crackles could be due to the quality of your cartridge.
Actually we can hear the difference. But, if you play CD as opposed to vinyl, the sound would be even better.
Yet these vinyl freaks want do that.
if you are limited by space then you will not be able to hear soundstage with your current set up. Speaker too close to each other, and it is flushed to the wall. The sound is 2 dimensional. Put the speakers 2 meters apart, and half a meter from the backwall, and you'll hear the difference. It's a huge upgrade and it's free.
No it won't lol. CD = DAC. I have a bad ass DAC and sorry vinyl beats 192khz 24bit all day. So CDs just can't hang and why I see them in the biggest trouble. Vinyl sounds different and better so there is a reason to buy. CDs just stream and save money........ lol
@@wiebl5266 yep
@@budsmoker4201120 saying it won't doesn't mean it is true. Name me the time and the place, and I'll show up.
I think sound quality isn't key to some people. they like the physical and tangible factor of vinyl
vinyl sound louder but man I can't be paying $55 for each vinyl. They cost more than the vinyl players
If you want louder, just crank up the volume.
Only costs more if you buy the absolute cheapest low end record player you can find 🙏 But a nice turntable will cost a whole lot more 💵 And doesn't come with built in speakers and amplifier
The Vinyl sounds real and loud,
Hands Down with the proper sound system the vinyl WILL always prevail... Vinyl is true sound on a true system. You have not heard the vinyls true sound?
I've never got a vinyl record stuck in a record player.😅
you tested it on youtube though which is very low quality audio should test with high bit rate file or CD but also the record probably sounded worse because- i didnt see a receiver which means ur probably using powered speakers which dont have the best amp for vinyl records- so in the end- i couldnt hear the difference on my phone and even if it was in person id still find something to complain about i guess
I’m not going to get into while this whole thing won’t work. Just a few tips get your speaker’s farther apart so they can try and generate a stereo field. Try and place them near ear level to where you will be when listening to them. Finally get them pulled out away from the wall and play with toeing them in to various angles to find what sounds best in your space.
@jeffreyallison771 - Speaker stands might also help…and a real turntable
To hear him say My Record Player. Sounds like a fruit cake... Um......Turntable!!!!
Funny thing is that vinyl record has been recorded digitally then has been Put on to the vinyl so it’s not a true analog vinyl sound
a true analog vinyl sound can only be found from When vinyls were first made to about the late 1990s Mid90s
So all these new vinyls from 2000 and up aren’t true analog sound it’s all been copied from a digital sound and copied to a vinyl
@GrahmDahleSelfMade - You’re misinformed. There are record companies like Analog Productions who are using master tapes or good tape sources to press vinyl without digital steps.
From thier website: Analogue Productions audio mastering for its reissued albums is done using only the original analogue master tapes, hence the name of the label. Analogue Productions LP reissues feature thicker grade vinyl pressed at 180 grams weight or better, making for superior audiophile reproduction.
@@cirenosnor5768 ya but where in the hell are people gonna get that shit
If they do that they need to make all of them like that
Instead of someone goin to Walmart and finding a vinyl and it sounds like ass because it’s been remastered and they take all they dynamics out of the song and make it all equally loud
can't wait for this whole vinyl madness to stop
Vinyl is wayyyyyy clearer and detailed
Vinyl is digital
Vinyl is analogue😂😭
I definitely heard some high frequency excitement out of the vinyl there.
Vinyl for the win
I don't like it, too bright imo. both through phone speakers, Anker soundcore2 speakers it sounded less bad on my Samson sr850's tho
I collect high speed tape and LPs. Yes LP is crisper and clearer.. they admit Cds took a hit on the sound clarity to get fast sales and get it out faster..
@globaldeception7414 - I don’t think “crisper and clearer” are major virtues of vinyl compared to digital. If anything, the turntables most are using is *less* crisp and a has a softer sound. As some have mentioned here. I think better vinyl and turntables do however have more ambiance and a bigger soundstage. Nobody ever seems to talk about those things
@@cirenosnor5768 not true. High speed tape and LP win over Cds anyday
Through CZcams? It has terrible audio. What a strange comparison.
Vinyl plays faster yet crispier but I guess that's just the mix...
@Nocind - Vinyl plays faster??? Is shouldn’t. If it does, something’s wrong.
I have a Celine Dion vinyl that I bought 10 years ago haha and I barely played it because i didnt own a record player, I can probably count the times played with my fingers yet still it has a lot of stuttering and has very pronounced jumps, I dont get it, not the best for preservation 😢
If I had to make a guess, I'd say it's probably your equipment and not the record 🤔
I ran this test same via Bjork, Pink Floyd, Hooverphonic and Hendrix….
My Formats= ITunes, modern vinyl, vintage vinyl, and CD.
(Hendrix is what I knew in my bones)
So I hyper focused on that being that I’ve even heard Band of Gypsy’s on reel-to-reel.
My conclusion =
Vintage vinyl much to my shock actually sounds better than Mod….
But the BS that comes with it is NOT worth the tiny difference unless you are obsessive AF and have more money than brains.
Mod vinyl sounds better than CD…..
But again, unless you just enjoy the ritual… not really worth it.
I’m not sure what’s happening with the world today, perhaps life is so complicated we are reverting back to simpler times “VHS, Laser Disk, vintage video games… all coming back again !?!”
vinyl is a great option for not only ritualistic endeavors, but also a great outlet for inner-self-expression.
However, at the end of the day unless you are talking about ultra-complex sounds (No offense, Eminem would be a super shitty example compared to say…Frédéric Chopin, or even Rush)
It is from a logical stand point a huge waste of time and money in regards to “sounds better”
unless you are into nostalgia for nostalgias sake I’d suggest playing it safe and getting your music in the least-pain-in-the-ass-way as possible.
In these trying times…. Nothing really sounds better than saving money where you can.
Problem is current "modern" Vynils are made from Digital Master recordings, so, traditional Vynil Quality was never there... "Old" Vynils sounded better because they were made using Tape-Master recordings (an analog to analog conversion, avoiding sound frequency losses due to compression / encription)
thank u that what I just said in my comment people are to stupid to realize this
You have digital recording since 1970, and it has been better than analog forever. So many Vinyl is either from digital master or even digital overall, but this doesnt made it bad at all. If you're over 30 you maby not even be able to hear 16kHz, but you're complaining about cut-off at 20kHz? There also is something called lossless compression but you, of course, can hear this too, on a 1000k$ HiFi system, can't you?! xD
@@PM-wt3ye So, in your opinion, a $1k audio system is expensive? Let me guess, you're under 30 right?
Thats what i want so say - you can hear those differneces EVEN on a hifi system that costs as little as 1000k$...I was sarcastic about your golden hearing. WHEN do i start hear thoese miniscule differences, 10k, 20k, 50k?? How many people who are listening to music even have a 1000$ System, 5%? How many do have a 3k system, 1%? 10k 0,01%... Maybe 50 years age you had to buy expensive stuff, today you can hear really music very nicely on a 1k$ system with 50$ worth of cables. @@radiux_sv
@radiux_sv - At least learn to spell vinyl - lol. For the record, there’s no such word as “vinyls” - this word has been used so much by a younger generation that people think it is in fact a word. It isn’t
There *are* new vinyl pressings…not new vinyls….that *are* using analog tape as the source. Visit Analog Productions
Obviously, the vinyl is better
Not really but alr
Vinyls are better digtal cds We're just designed for computer or gaming consoles
Small difference
Digital music is compressed for saving server space and or making smaller files before streaming was popular. Vinyl is a full rich uncompressed sound. I used to dj when i was 15 in the 90s. I am 41 now. I have heard music on most mediums old and new.
Could you please add more details? I think it’s important to see your experience
Thats BS and you probably know it. Many songs (after 1970) that exist on vinyl are recorded digitally, or at least mastered digitally, before pressed on vinly. You know what you hear on vinyl? Distortion, cracks, clicks and so on but of course this sounds great
@PM-wt3ye - Also can hear a better sense of ambiance, bigger soundstage, etc with the level of vinyl playback most have never heard and seem a waste of money… nobody talks about that and they probably can’t.
I don’t know what recordings you speak of but in the 70’s, seems most rock/pop/R&B recordings were still analog.
When a biased vinyl lover does a comparison. Vinyl running too fast.
Eminems the goat 🐐
you could've used a proper mixing desk and ATLEAST A FLAC
Whats better than FLAC? Doesnt get better than that
Most modern pressings of albums sound like 💩 you wanna compare vinyl to digital used first pressings from the 70s/80s.
Look... There's NO justice with your system.... The sounds system sucks? Itty bitty speakers.....What an embarrassment. You are definitely NOT getting the full sound of the vinyl. You obviously don't know much about music.. That's free info at no charge. ENOUGH SAID!!!
Ish get a better record player and someone that can do a pro calibration of the cartridge
Add a separate phono stage and it will blow away the Digital
Comparing apples to lemons is not a good comparison kid!
Better on vinil
Oh naw 😂 that's cool fair comparison, are volume levels equal? Using CZcams is not even considered digital audio it's on a video format.
Team vinyle 👇
You look like the next Jeffrey dahmer…
The room does not sound well, so both does not sound good.
Vinyl oke
Nothing can be compared with vinyl output, even lossless digital.❤❤
We are listening just to 128 kbps compressed youtube audio so it is impossible to compare any of them since both sounds through digital compressed streaming.
Thats true, because it has cracks, clicks and so one which you never find on CD. But the vinyl still is digital probably
What turntable do you use?
its the audio technica lp60x 🫡
1:10:10
record player!!!
Vinyl is not for hip hop. Wrong format to listen to rap
Actually vinyl was embraced by rap DJs back in the late 80s.
@agustinmireles5817 - Vinyl is not for hip hop? That seems debatable since hip hop was originally played by DJ’s who used turntables? Thus production and mastering for hip hop took that into consideration even after CD’s became more prominent?
Vinil is bad digital master... Now!
😂
You have a cheap turntable no shit it won’t sound any special
Why your nails are black?
because they look nice
does it have anything to do with you?
@@blackbat908 why would it? I don't even know the guy, it would be a crazy coincidence if so
Both sound like shi+, not because of the format.