The Mysterious Nature of Time: Unexplained Phenomena and Theories

Explore the enigmatic world of time in this fascinating video that delves into the mysterious nature of time. From unexplained phenomena to mind-bending theories, discover the captivating secrets surrounding this fundamental concept. Join us on a journey through the complexities of time and unravel the mysteries that continue to puzzle scientists, philosophers, and enthusiasts of metaphysics, cosmology, and quantum mechanics alike. We'll dive into the realms of time travel, perception, and reality, exploring dimensions and the strangeness of existence.
What are your thoughts on time-related experiences or theories? Share them in the comments below! Don't forget to subscribe for more intriguing content on the mysteries of our universe.
🔔 Subscribe for more videos: / @luminousinsights
#Metaphysics #Space #Philosophy #Enigma #Nature #Science #Physics #Universe #TimeTravel #Time #Perception #Reality #QuantumMechanics #Cosmology #Mysterious #Theories #Dimensions #UnexplainedPhenomena #Strangeness #Existence #Astrophysics #Relativity #Multiverse #ParallelUniverses #TemporalAnomalies #DeepThought #ScientificMysteries #ExistentialQuestions #CosmicWonder #InfinitePossibilities

[@Music_Creativity_Science]

Concerning the twin paradox at 2:25 , only accelerated motion phases create time dilation
It is a mathematical fact in the Lorentz factor, used in the Special Relativity (SR) time dilation equation, that the squared velocity variable there is equal to: 2 • acceleration • distance. Which is an equation originally derived by Torricelli (v squared = 2 • acceleration • distance, assuming initial velocity = 0), later incorporated among Newtons equations of motion.
What that means is that the SR time dilation equation is not valid (can not be used) for calculating time dilation for time intervals where acceleration does not take place. Which means that the so called Clock hypothesis is false, which assumes that acceleration as such has no effect on time dilation. Instead, it is ONLY accelerated motion (but not gravitational acceleration with free fall) which creates physical time dilation.
So:
- The Clock hypothesis can be debunked in this simple way above.
- Equations in Special relativity, containing the v^2 variable can not be used for inertial (non-accelerated) motions, they are only mathematically valid for accelerated motions. This seems to be a very common mistake by many physicists (on university level as well) in calculation examples.
- The twin "paradox" can then be fully explained/understood, intuitively, logically, mathematically and physically. Physical processes in atoms slow down when a rocket is accelerated. Only one twin is accelerated and it does not matter how far he/she travels back and forth with a non-accelerated coasting motion, the physical time dilation will be the same. The so called distance proof, that velocity as such, in inertial or non-inertial motion, is the source of time dilation is false. It is an invalid use (interpretation) of the time dilation equation, which produces different time dilations for different travelled total distances for the travelling twin.

[@donbaxley5530]

If time could flow backwards that would mean time had an end.

[@Luminousinsights]

Perhaps 🤔, it’s a complex idea, I would love to believe that time flowing either way would be infinite considering the magnitude of our universe. But i like that thought🤓

[@vidajugg]

There is no concept more fundamental than nothingness!
Khalid Masood

[@Luminousinsights]

Perhaps :P

[@kevinhaynes9091]

I don't know about you, but I can time travel. I time travel into the future at a rate of one second per second...

[@Luminousinsights]

Awesome and I do a minute every minute :)