Federalist 69 The President is Not a King

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 9. 03. 2020
  • This video examines Alexander Hamilton's arguments in Federalist Paper 69 concerning the powers of the president. He finds that there are adequate checks on the executive's power which will prevent the president from becoming a king.

Komentáře • 13

  • @gabrieldgallegos
    @gabrieldgallegos Před měsícem +3

    Alexander Hamilton: The President is Not a King
    SCOTUS: hold my beer

  • @Ohdear.ana_
    @Ohdear.ana_ Před 5 měsíci

    Thank you so much for posting an explanation about this. I was having trouble understanding and it was difficult to find a video explaining❤

  • @madisonsiciliano4439
    @madisonsiciliano4439 Před 3 lety +1

    Hi professor! Thank you so much for posting this content to the public and making education accessible to all. I am watching your lectures to prepare for my own course at AU, and I noticed you're an Alum. I have studied Con Law for years and these are extremely helpful overviews.

  • @dayzsaclark7543
    @dayzsaclark7543 Před 3 lety

    Great video, Dr. Leckrone!

  • @hopedrugs7876
    @hopedrugs7876 Před 3 lety

    Thank you Sir

  • @jakelong6860
    @jakelong6860 Před 17 dny

    Kevin Roberts said he gets ultimate power.

  • @calebcash6778
    @calebcash6778 Před 3 lety +1

    Nice.

  • @LatinListingKings
    @LatinListingKings Před 3 lety +1

    What did Hamilton say about having a group of people as the executive branch versus a single person? Or Why do you think we need a single leader today versus a groupe of people leading our country? I got asked this question and couldn't answer except for we wouldn't get anything done and that as a society from history until today we have needed a leader to look up to for leadership. Please help if you can. Thanks

    • @Fortunatus144
      @Fortunatus144 Před 3 dny

      He pointed out that with a collegial executive there is a risk of division, of indecision (which can be very bad in times of crisis), but also a lot of doubt on who is really responsible for a bad decision, since any member of the executive can claim that it’s the others’ fault.