Chapter 4.2: Wilhelm Dilthey, the importance of hermeneutics
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 02. 2018
- This video is part of the series: The Philosophy of the Humanities which you can find here: • Philosophy of the Huma...
For more videos on Philosophy by Victor Gijsbers go to:
czcams.com/channels/xdW.html...
Don't ever stop, Victor! I love these short explanations!
A really beautifully done and inspiring lecture! I think I should read some Dilthey from now on!
Well done. Dilthey reminds us that the natural sciences only answer some questions. The Humanities
address the vast landscape of life which is human experience.
Thank you so much Victor. For the first time in my life I have a clear picture of the values of the humanities and a clearer sense of its different to the natural sciences. And of course why I personally find pleasure in it. Thank you
What an amazing teaching lesson. Thank you so much for sharing!
Great work. Your channel saved my life the night before my exam. It is not so easy understanding these ideas and philosophies and you did a laudable job making them intelligible for amateurs like me
Wonderful insight in humanities. Now I will try to put my self in author's place to understand his perspective and to see what he could have experienced.
Great talk .
Fantastic overview of Dilthey, hermeneutics, verstehen, and ideas around historicity. I love learning about 19th century German philosophy.
So well explained and interesting. I'm now going to read Dilthey. Thank you.
as a highschooler and philosophy taker who misses many classes because of chronic illness, this guy really saves my grades 💪
Dilthey makes the humanities feel important!
Yes he does, because it should be!
Dilthey makes playing computer games feel important :)
I cant say forsure that by reading history we can re-live the experience but i am sure it broadens our narrow perception of religion or politics or something else.
brilliant video! absolutely fascinating theory and explained so clearly and easy to understand. This video has been so useful for my coursework.
Outstanding work. Mucho appreciated
Bravissimo! Excellent! Incredibly clear! Brilliant!
Many thanks for such good explanation, great work!
Very good teacher. Thank you!
Appreciate these videos
Very helpful! Thank you!
Excellent video.
Mooie lezing. Goed gearticuleerd uitgesproken, rustig gebracht. Super ! En zo kan een lastig onderwerp toch begrijpelijk worden.
Perfect explanation..
thank you so much! I have to take a mandatory philosophy course for my master's in uni, and there are SO many texts, it can get a bit overwhelming. watching these videos before/after reading helps make everything so much clearer, so again, THANK YOU SO MUCH.
Very good, thank you
great job, TY!!!
How similar is Quines Holism to the Hermeneutic Circle?
Brilliant
"Innner-Directed" was a VALS/Lifestyle category identified by SRI ... interesting.
could you please share your resources on this topic ?
Can you explain what is hermeneutics and the founder
what he discribes can be translated into understanding - the meaning of the german word 'Nachvollziehen' would suit his discription more directly. considering that german is a very precise language.
yes, but he is using the word verstehen as is used by Dilthey
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verstehen
Bravo! You speak very well. And i can understand also i don' t speak a good engludh
Nice....👍👍👍
I am from India
7:53
As a STEM lord, I find this as a bold claim
#Robot
This guy has a voice right out of an 80s TV announcement
Computers can be technicians but not scientists. Regardless of the subject matter or methodology, a scientist must come up with ideas from her material, just like humanists. The same leap of creativity is required for both scientists and humanists.
Nobody can get the same experience as others, simply it is impossible. The mental state I experience when drinking my favourite drink feels not the same as you drink it.
How can you know it's not the same?
1:00 Wilhelm Dilthey
1:30 What humanities study? Erlebnis.
😶
Applause
Informative, educating and with an order. Very good video.
4:19 I have to agree with Dilthey and disagree with Collingwood. Based on what the narrator says about what Collinwood said, I think it is incredibly stupid; trying to study pieces of works only by trying to replicate thoughts of the author does not give you understanding of the whole picture; you need all the aspects of the author including the emotional side, his desires, his physical state during that time of him writing the work etc.
Thank you!
3.29- a study of the expression of an experience
Collingwood- 're-enactment'
Natural Sciences can be studied through
Humanities require 'life-experiences'
'Verstehen'
a medieval Moongk
was läuft was läuft was läuft
skrr skrr
Ik wist dat hij een Nederlander was! Haha
Literary critics? COme on now, he NEVER employs that terminology...and the humanities back in 1880s did not include all the political detritus of this era, and was therefore a wholly different context--an aspect of which is also part of Dilthey's methodological propositions... IOW, you are NOT appreciation the historicity of when those arguments were made and to whom he was addressing the so called "HUMAN SCIENCES," which did NOT include Literary Critics in the way in which we understand them today...
BTW, forgot to say that I otherwise enjoyed your lecture and want to say thank you!