People want to avoid jury duty and often it’s easier then you think. Many lawyers hate when jurors understand they are the defendants last stand. As such just say you believe in he jurors right to nullification
This is why the jury system does not work. Trials should be based on facts and logic not on this man on the street shit who don't know or even have to follow the law.
@AliciaMarchant i dont think i could ever be a good juror because i dont agree with a lot of the laws in the usa. Were supposed to be free so if they are trying to prosecute someone and there is not a victim , im saying innocent every time.
Alright- not only does this not really talk about any sort of "look at jury selection." I don't even know what the heck this guy even does. Whoever put this story together should be fired.
You dont need a jury whisperer you need to make people who are on state assistance or unemployment do jury duty. They have been payed by the state this the way you pay back the state through civil duty.
If you're someone who took a sentence that you deem unfair, would you feel better or worse if 10 people all agreed that you are guilty instead of a single judge?
@@SA_Rocket I know what you meant. I just thought it would better if that 10 people have some credibility/qualifications about laws or certain subjects.. that would help make better decisions instead of choosing random people on the street
People want to avoid jury duty and often it’s easier then you think. Many lawyers hate when jurors understand they are the defendants last stand. As such just say you believe in he jurors right to nullification
If you look good it will probably be not guilty. If you don't it will probably be guilty. America is obsessed with appearance.
This is why the jury system does not work. Trials should be based on facts and logic not on this man on the street shit who don't know or even have to follow the law.
That's mean white judges black victims, prisons will be filled of blacks, executions rooms would work 24/7
Jurors are suppose to follow what the law says, so if there’s no evidence or not enough to prove it they’re suppose to find them not guilty.
@AliciaMarchant i dont think i could ever be a good juror because i dont agree with a lot of the laws in the usa. Were supposed to be free so if they are trying to prosecute someone and there is not a victim , im saying innocent every time.
Alright- not only does this not really talk about any sort of "look at jury selection." I don't even know what the heck this guy even does. Whoever put this story together should be fired.
right? What do people hire him to do? Either way, sounds fishy to me.
If you don't like the way they look, GUILTY! Don't even look at the evidence, just GUILTY
Not All Juries Are The Same
I want to be a juror or state attorney
He told us absolutely nothing
You dont need a jury whisperer you need to make people who are on state assistance or unemployment do jury duty. They have been payed by the state this the way you pay back the state through civil duty.
that would lead to an extremely biased jury
@@kelseybarton Jurys already are
Stupid system. They're just normal people dont even know the laws, let lone smart, competent enough to make a decision 🙄
Let’s just hope the jury in Johnny & Ambers trial aren’t Amber heard Stan’s…
it's better than a single judge deciding your faith.
If you're someone who took a sentence that you deem unfair, would you feel better or worse if 10 people all agreed that you are guilty instead of a single judge?
@@SA_Rocket I know what you meant. I just thought it would better if that 10 people have some credibility/qualifications about laws or certain subjects.. that would help make better decisions instead of choosing random people on the street
It's not their job to "know the laws", that's the lawyers and judges job