The Chances Of SURVIVING A 200 KM/H CRASH (PART 1)
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- This time we are crashing into lots of stuff to see how different the results of 200 km/h crash can be...
Leave a like if you enjoyed the video and subscribe for more simulations!!
The physics of some models may have been modified to replicate real-life performance as close as possible.
#Crash #Test #BeamNG
![Police Chase and Car Crashes #02 [BeamNG.Drive]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/oWPTCOrijmc/mqdefault.jpg)
Something to consider is that this is a modern rally car, they are really tough. You wouldn't be so lucky in a road car 💀
Yes, they probably used the rally car because of the roll cage so they only need to consider the danger of differents amounts of g forces. In a normal without a roll cage the driver does not only need to survive the g forces but also the compression of the car which is often fatal at 200kmh
the G forces are survivable in a rally car because of hans device etc.
Except for on pure concrete. 350G is certain death.
Also gotta consider the use of racing harnesses, helmets, hans device, etc.
Yeah I used a rally car to give it a better chance as it is kinda prepared to crash at this speeds. You don´t wanna see an 80s hatchback crashing at 200 km/h...
4:32 Robert Kubica was one of that 20% who survived crash like that 😳
And got back to Formula 1 almost a decade later. He is Superman.
proud to be of the same nationality as him 🇵🇱
He truly is Giga Kubica
@@carnonPL same
But Tóth Zsolt (Hungarian co-driver) no was in the 20% 😔🖤
1:04 poor thing is traumatized
4:32 It's very similar to the accident at Robert Kubica 2011
I know the tyre wall is supposed to say Grip All, but one says RIP ALL.
Was that deliberate? Cos if so, that's hilariously on point.
It is official content. BeamNG has the best devs in the world so I´m sure it was deliberate. Their attention to detail is mind-blowing
I thing the more deadly thing about a guardrail is the thing behind the rail. Trees, Cliffs, Rivers etc.
I hit a tire wall in front of a concrete wall at 186kmh, a few broken bones but evidently survivable 😊
Wow... Glad you survived.
The car did not, a 458 Challenge Ferrari at the end of the straight in Fuji under the Audi sign. Brake pedal broke!
Without a HANS device, I'd hate to be in any accident
Shoutout to the 100 drivers who crashed and died for the experiment
Imagine all those F1 crashes...
The only reason why F1 drivers don't break their necks while having 50G crashes is probably due to their heads being strapped to the car
@@davidtsiangwy And even then internal injuries are entirely possible.
@@davidtsiangwy and because of the neck muscles training
f1 fanboy 🤓
@@chaos..... fine then,
Imagine all those NASCAR crashes.
Or, WRC crashes,
Or your mom crashes.
4:32 Guard Rail (The Robert Kubica way)
I think you're being optimistic with the 20% on the last one mate, given the guardrail ended inside the driver lmao
Where did you get the g force to chance of survival data btw?
With calculations :)
I would say 20% is actually accurate
It puts it in “unlikely to survive” category, and not “near impossible”
Since we have a real life example of a person suffering a very similar accident(Robert Kubica, 2011 Ronde di Andorra rally), I’d say 20% is about right
I feel that guard rail one could be higher if it was one with those end terminals that shoots the rail to the side
They make a huge difference. We will be testing those in part 2 ;)
The 5th one should be: “Guardrail (Kubica way)”
How is 150gs 50% survival chance. More like 25% or less.
And the 1st one is right out death
2 tyre walls: 50% survival chance (with racing equipment 75%)
3 tyre walls: survival chance 65% (racing equipment 85%)
SAFER barrier: 40% survival chance (60% with racing equipment)
Concrete barrier: dead (25% w/ racing equipment)
Guardrail: 70% survival chance (95% w/ racing equipment.
Just my opinion dont kill me
150G is survivable if it´s not a side impact. Hunter-Reay at Pocono (138G), Danica Patrick at Homestead (150G), David Purley at Siverstone (179G), Jos Vertsppen at Spa (180G) all survived. A 50% is very reasonable.
@@THEWINDTUNNEL those are extremely safe single seater open wheel race cars. Do you think a WRC class can handle a 100+ G impact? Nah
@@THEWINDTUNNEL now i want you to take a look about all fatalities with 100+Gs and u will realise how wrong you were. Anyway great editing and simulation. You just got those stuff wrong
@@MaximoSirianidelCarril Purley's 180G crash was in the 70s! I would rather have a 150G crash in a modern WRC car. Thanks for the kind words man :)
@@THEWINDTUNNEL But as I said. Its a low survival chance still.
4:52 Right in the baby maker
Bro has a roll cage 💀
I recommend every mini van owner should install roll cage 😆
Yeah, just let me sell my house to buy a rally car which is purposely built to withstand such impact forces in exchange of my Hyundai Elantra.
I did 96kmh, or 60mph, head on with a full size truck. My CTS4 didn't fair well. But I'm alive.
Wow... Glad you glad you made it out OK.
@@THEWINDTUNNEL, thank you. Came to in the ambulance, who knows how long after the crash.
The wall is clearly Andrew Tate, cause it's top G
First comment that didn’t get to see this video early
No one did. They just commented before the premiere :)
@@THEWINDTUNNEL ahhh that makes sense lol
For those of you who don’t know the metric system, 200 k/h is about 120 M/h. You’re welcome,
polish pain
Can you make a video where you will race Group C cars, 1998-1999 GT1 cars and ´05-´11 GT1 cars?
I have something similar on the list...
Theres no survival chance on these kind of crashes, what's under the hood would just get jammed inside together with the passengers, past the airbags, and what's not hitting the airbag would just stomp the carpet or pedals so hard it ended up on the tyres.
This a WRC car. Some of the safest cars in the world. They crash into walls, trees fall off cliffs... No deaths in the last 20 seasons.
@JUST SIMRACING rally cars are designed to be safe within rally environments. They would serve worse to the occupants in a 200-0 km impact. Stronger cars only transfer greater g load to the occupants. Vehicle deformation is inherent to survivability.
@Badly_Dubbed not necessarily, while yes vehicle deformation absorbs the energy of the system by a large amount, having the cabin colapse will kill the occupant just the same as getting ping-ponged around the cabin when your belt snaps, for instance a front end crash with a front engine and engine crash ramp and adequate crumble areas has the potential to be very survivable if certain things are designed well, the crumple beams crumple absorbing the impact to their capacity, the engine is pushed back against the engine crash ramp and is then deflected down to the bottom of the car and this action absorbs a significant portion of the energy the vehicle has as the engine has alot of mass, the A pillers and roll cage must prevent collapse as if it does the occupant can be speared or pinched between bars or folds of the cars body. More or less to make a vehicle survivable at the speeds they go in motor sport takes a multitude of different ideas, concepts, and implementations or these in order to remove hazards to the driver once a crash has begun, 4 point harness, roll cage adjustemts to make the staps of the harness perpendicular to the occupants shoulders, pie cutting cage gussets to make them funtionally thicker and lighter, helmets with top of the line materials and designs, neck restriction pillows, helmet to seat straps, body moulded seats, wiplash seat ears/vision restrictors, auto fire suppressors, quick exit windows, correct crash training, vehicle handling training, and probably a lot more im missing.
@unclemcpeanut Road cars and race cars have very different priorities when it comes to protecting its occupants. For a start race cars gave the driver lower, further back and central which isn't possible for a road car. You'll never ever make car that can save its passengers in a 200km head on impact regardless. Rally cars for insurance will protect you while you bounce of trees, however you hit a tree down the cars centre line and come to a sudden stop, your dead. Road cars need to function and absorb crash impact at normal everyday road speed and they do a very good job these days.
@@badly_dubbed2401 i think youre talking about rear engine mounted cars, with carbon kevlar body kits, and a roll bar..?. judging from experience
i still think its kinda unfair to test them in a frontal collision because guard rail and concrete barriers are basically made to absorb and deflect a car and not just be ripped in the middle.
That's the point of this video, to see the difference between hitting different objects even if they are not designed to do that.
great video ,please do it again with other car and other speed
Yeetery, nice!! 😁😅
That is super cool, but not enough Crush.. would be nothing left but the back bumper. Its as though the deformation model ends at the passenger cell. Just watch crash tests with 1/100th that energy. The guardrail one is especially off.
I think its because he is using a rally car. They're pretty tough plus the rollcage
vilebrequin approved
Considering blunt force trauma exist almost all of these scenarios you would get a concussion or Brian damage or internal bleeding explosion of the lungs they are accurate but some of them aren’t
Häkkinen, Van der Drift and Bräck survived 200G+ impacts
@@THEWINDTUNNEL did he get a concussion ofc
It is very satisfactory beamng drive
"Welcome to facts or cap-"
Racecar without belts, Hans, helmet...
A rally car has the roll cage protection made out of 7-tonne tubular steel?
Pre-8 hour gang here
what mod did you use for the road barrier?
It's base content
Excelente lo que mostras hermano y es más o menos un pantallazo a las probabilidades de sobrevivir
And always wear a seatbelt
Rally cars are no safer than road cars in regards to frontal impacts, and their stronger construction only transfers more energy to the occupants.
That's on a 60 km/h crash. Now if you crash at 150 km/h... I would rather be on the rally car.
@@THEWINDTUNNEL road cars aren't designed to protect you at that speed and neither should they be.
How do you view the crashes from so many angles?
Recording it on BeamNG and using the freecam
I didn't watch the video basically you don't have any changes to survive if you crash directly straight wall. Even can be seen no impact in the cabin, you'll still die in few hour because of internal bleeding. Even if you crash with 100 km straight stopped vehicle or wall, seatbelt will hold you and you organs will start bleeding because of the momentum of hitting. Don't speed and even if you're speeding, just die alone, don't take other innocent people with you.
That's not true. There's dozens of head-on crashes in motorsport every year and drivers survive.
@@THEWINDTUNNEL as you said "in motorsports" but I was talking about real life and who is speeding on Autobahn so they're totally different thing. If you crash a normal car to wall with 100km, there is no chance you'll survive
@@enessolhan This is clearly a racing car, it's safer than a road car, it would be complete different story in a road car but again, this isn't a road car so I don´t know what's wrong
@@THEWINDTUNNEL I don't see that you clearly wrote it in the title?? So it doesn't matter and just wanted to give advice people
Oh damn
how you count the chance of survival (sorry for my Eng)?
I'm not a car crash expert but it's something I've been interested since I was a kid and I know quite a lot about it. Asked a couple of medicine and physics guys too
what rims were used on this car? thanks
I didn´t change them, stock ones. This is the Cherrier Vivace tarmac rally car.
@@THEWINDTUNNEL thank you, they are very similar to the 2022 NASCAR Next Gen rims so i thought it was a mod. thanks again
@@Jeb4100 They are very similar... no loose tyres here though :)
@@THEWINDTUNNEL haha right
@@THEWINDTUNNEL are you sure? im in BeamNG right now and the rims are different for me
Why is the name on the doors M. Mouton?
I think it’s a reference to Michèle mouton, who was a group B rally driver in the 1980s
👆🏻
Kubica s way....
A great eay to have 100% chances survive: never go 220km/h go slowet
a 200 all'ora contro un muro sei morto anche con l'abitacolo integro
Be a lot cooler if it was real
With $10M I can make it happen. Should I start a crowdfund?😂
This reminds me of Ott Tanak crash at 185km/h
czcams.com/video/qfgtins1HC8/video.html
The thing is that it’s impossible to get more then about 60g in a 200-0 km/h incident, I tested with maths to see if BeamNG drive’s g force system was realistic and it was. Maybe just get the real info for next time. Anyways, greatly edited video and fun to watch.
I don't know which maths you did but that's wrong. You can get way more than 60G in a 200 km/h crash. You want a real-life example? Kyle Busch, Daytona 2015. He hit a concrete wall at 130 km/h almost head on, yet It could've been a worse angle. It was 97G impact czcams.com/video/2ZBLnKkWgQw/video.html Even more interesting: Fifth Gear crashed a road car into a solid barrier at 193 km/h, almost the same crash you saw here. 400 G impact. czcams.com/video/R7dG9UlzeFM/video.html . The amount of Gs you can get in a crash is almost unlimited, basically the sooner you stop, the higher the figure will be. A car will alway crumple and that's gonna help a lot by making that stop less sudden reducing the Gs of the impact. But imagine you go head first into a concrete wall at 200 km/h if you could somehow achieve that speed running... The Gs of that impact would probably in be in the 4-digits... If you are into maths there's lots of very interesting calculators and tools to calculate the force of car crashes on the Internet. Really appreciate your words!
so 80% chance of surviving over 80g 😂😂😂
In motorsport in the last 10 years at least 80% of the 80G impacts have been survivable. Thiago Monteiro, Charlie Kimball, Kyle Busch, James Winslow, Sergio Pérez, Mark Webber, Sean Rayhall to name a few survived 80G-100G impacts without important internal injuries
@@THEWINDTUNNEL survivable aint 80%
@@chaos..... I have a personal archive with hundreds of G-Force data recordings from accidents across every era of motorsport. There are 52 crashes over 80G, only 7 are fatal. That´s 13.5%. I try to use as much real data and statistics as posible to do this videos.
Just see the real test on the @vilebrequin french channel, a real RangeRover at 130km/h on a wall 😮 this is not the same
czcams.com/video/3VtLh-IABuk/video.html
Your right it’s not the same. This video is showing a wrc car while your talking about a Range Rover