The CONTROVERSIAL Production of Civil War (2024)
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 05. 2024
- Head to squarespace.com/framevoyager to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code framevoyager
From the controversial storyline to the unique cameras used for to make this film and more, lets get in to the Controversial production of Civil War!
⭐️EFFECTS WE USE⭐️
FILM CONVERT NITRATE & Halation: bit.ly/3MT9TOp
CINEMATCH www.filmconvert.com/purchase/...
⭐️⭐️⭐️
🖥️Editor: John Owens
✏️Writer: Elwood, John Owens
📚Researcher: John Owens, Elwood
🖼️Thumbnail Squad: newsx3900, Huy, Jeyccie
🤖A.I. Programs Used: Midjourney
⭐️⭐️⭐️
💬FRAME VOYAGER COMMUNITY💬
=============================
💭Join our Discord Channel💬 ► / discord
🐦Twitter ► / frame_voyager
📷Instagram ► / framevoyager
🎵TikTok ► / framevoyager
Join our CZcams channel 📺 ► / @framevoyager
=============================
0:00 The CONTROVERSIAL Production of Civil War (2024)
1:01 Development
2:14 OH NO!
2:58 The Writing Process
6:25 The Controversy
9:48 Production Begins - A24's Most Expensive Film
11:00 Cinematography - DJI Ronin 4D makes an appearance
12:28 Kirstin Dunst learns how to use a camera
13:23 Alex Garland to stop directing?
Disclosure - Some of the links in the description box are affiliate links. At no extra cost to you, if you use those links to purchase an item, I will receive a small commission. I appreciate your support :)
-----
#civilwar #alexgarland #FrameVoyager - Krátké a kreslené filmy
Are you going to see Civil War in theaters?
Can't my Away for holidays 😢
@@neilhannan7525 Same, I've got a film shoot I'm out at and NAB until next week. Super sad I can't see it on Thursday
Hahaha no. Garland has no conservative friends and hates us.
Yes. I am intrigued but not quite excited.
@@mattisimo I'm not sure I'm "excited" for the film, as I think it's going to be more of a "gut-punch" type film
As a Canadian the best part of the movie was when he said 300$ American is worth nothing and 300$ Canadian is worth a lot 😂
Lol that made me chuckle too
@@CrowCreator there was also another guy in the movie theater that was almost hyped about that
@@therealmrsteve Where you from? I'm from Aroland First Nation. I watched it in Thunder Bay, Ontario. I kept thinking while watching the film I wonder if Canada got taken over!?
@@CrowCreatorif Canada got take over how would the Canadian currency even exist anymore and why would the gas station people accept that as payment 😂😂😂😂😂
@@CrowCreator In contrary I believe that the movie makes it clear that Canada isn't touch by the civil war. The Canadian currency is still intact compared to the American one which shows the Canadian economy still works. I'm from Lévis, Quebec
I've been to war 2 tours in Iraq with the Marines. War is failing to get along with others. The veneer of human civilization is damned thin. Don't romanticize war. This movie does a good job of it. No one dies heroically. Death is repulsive and horrific. If we lose that reaction we're doomed.
It was a revolting film in a lot of ways
Thank you for your service.
How does this movie romanticize war?
I’ve been to war and I think it’s great for Americans to see the violence of combat on their own soil. We often only see curated images of conflict in far away places so the idea of being in a warzone is pretty nebulous for the average American.
Agreed.
absolutely, seeing war in your own home, hits different
Trump 2024
@@davidvice3720this is what’s gonna happen if trump wins
Guess you were under a rock on 9-11
People who can't imagine CA and TX uniting against a fellow enemy spends more time on Twitter than in the real world.
It's not about being ideological besties, it's about survival.
And who`s the enemy ? Ronald MacDonalds ?
The director use the union between CA and TX to show that te movie is not taking a party the movie not even let you clear that the journalist and photographer was inside of the moral, the intention of this is to let the people know that the news should never take a party too and the journalism is far more important than the reporter.
I watched the movie on opening weekend. It shook me and I can't stop thinking about it. There are so many underlying meanings in the film. The black and white still shots during the movie envoked tears. It is truly a horrifying spectical that needs to be seen.
So much talk about "journalism", but not about the critical distinction of "good journalism". What passes for journalism in most cases in the modern media space is simply opinion, and it's no wonder people don't trust it.
Okay temple guitars
@@vikupogi Is their name on here supposed to delegitimize their point?... Because yours is both a worse name and you said absolutely nothing. What they said is completely true.
They mean CORPORATE media.
You mention some interesting value judgements and assumptions in your statement here. Good Journalism is not a defined concept - I guarantee you that what you consider good journalism will not necessarily be the same as another person, right down to to the importance of opinion vs fact. I'm gathering from your implied preference that you prefer or value a liberal media system which strives for objectivity (This is the ideal that many people who live in America, Britain , Australia would espouse), but in many nations opinion is counted as important as the facts. You'll see this in many European countries - and its not necessarily a bad thing. In some ways used correctly its more honest since it accepts the basic fundamental fact that humans cannot be objective - but they can make reasoned statements and astute observations.
I think choosing war journos is a great choice here because as far as putting your money where your mouth is (Or your life in their case) its hard to think of a group of people who absolutely do this on a regular basis. Its very hard ot level a them that they are only interested in clickbait.
Also your gripe with journalism has more to do with corporatism than actual journos (who despite some incredibly obstacles still to this day manage some excellent reporting). I hope you bother to support your local news outlets - particular independents - because they need you to (and it seems you just might care to).
To be fair, the main characters were not journalists, they were war photographers. One of them even said something to the effect of "it's not our job to judge what we're seeing, but to get pictures out and let other people decide." When people talk about hating journalists, they're usually talking about people who write/regurgitate their hot takes from the comfort of their home. All that said, this movie is BORING. I appreciate that they didn't make it a cliche good vs bad story, but you're left knowing nothing about the war. You have no idea why the war broke out and the only thing you know about the President is that he gave a speech claiming his side was winning when that clearly wasn't true. I don't think anyone should be offended by this film because it's such an empty void of a movie, there's nothing to be offended by.
I'm maybe naively hopeful that the central message in the film, “No reason explains war, no reason explains the human cost of a war” as Moura alludes to, is a reminder to everyone that though we may be on opposite sides of a widening divide, a violent solution will not bridge the gap, but send us all into the chasm below.
most people chose peace and compromise and getting along. its the extremists on both sides that force the issue into violence. all it takes is enough of a push and enough extremists.
@@forsaken841 Oh, totally agree. The hard thing is not getting complacent with allowing those people to gain control.
I think you nailed it. Its is exactly how a topic should be handled. Anyone that wants to pick and chose a side with it likely haven't seen the movie, but after watching this I think I will go see it now I more fully understand the message.
That's a nice and pretty thought but when the state is committing that violence how else should someone react? Especially when peaceful options have been ignored or shut down with violence
@@DragonKeeper69 I think there is a difference between defending yourself and inciting violence. Violence for violence doesn't solve anything and creates more problems. Like I said in the video, we don't live in a utopia and violence is just a reality. But I think it just is up to each individual to decide if they want to participate in something that has a negative generational impact.
Listen,
I'm not American, and I didn't watch the film just yet.
But I'll let every American will know, whether if you're progressives or conservatives, left or right, north or south, east or west,
You're always be Americans. No matter what skin color, religion, sexuality, gender, and where you come from.
God bless y'all,
Greetings from Philippines. 🇺🇲🤝🇵🇭
A Iėftist can’t be American. They decried, denounced and destroyed everything it means to be one. And we see the results.
I agree giving the vote to women and blacks ruined this country, dammed leftists also ruined Jim Crow, and now THEYRE TRYING TO STOP US FROM ENSHRINING OUR CHRISTIAN BELIEFS INTO NATIONAL LAW! Pro choice is murder
People need to understand the truth in what you are saying.
Unfortunately we are talking about America... we disagree vehemently with each other, unfortunately it comes to blows sometimes. Shay's and the Whisky Rebellion, and Ohio v Michigan over Toledo, all happened before the war of 1812. Things get volatile when you have a bunch of wartribes in a trenchcoat, and sometimes we fight each other, a sad reality but reality none the less.
No one wants it, but there are many things no one wants. Those who are sane pray for peace, even though we know it shall not last forever.
"If there must be trouble, let it come in my time, that my children might have peace." -Thomas Paine
Good Luck and Godspeed.
Yeah but there's right and wrong... Good and Evil.
Be quiet Pinoy. You're not American. And you haven't even seen the movie yet. Don't talk nonsense. Pinoys should take your advice and stop hating on other pinoys.
Kind of reminds me of tomorrow when the war began. The author of that book and it’s adapted movie explicitly doesn’t explain who the invading army are but rather uses the conflict as a thought experiment for young Australians of what living in war zone would be like. When you take politics out of the conflict you’re just left with people shooting at each other.
One minor comment-- the Leica lens used is a Summicron 35 ASPH II adapted with a TTartisans mount. There was one shot early on that shows the mount branding clearly, and much later a clear shot down the barrel where you can see "Summicron" clearly, and with that hood, there's only one option. The detail there (I shoot primarily with an adapted Summicron IV on a Leica SL2-S) was spot on for something to be used in that situation
Thanks for the info!
Spoiler Below
****
Great pickup on that! Crazy detail for sure. The only thing that bugged me as a photographer is in the final scene in the White House when they never get Lee’s SD card 😭. I know that they were in a rush to get to the president but also when the whole film is focused on getting the shot and sharing the narrative of what’s going on it seemed like leaving that behind was a miss!
I was the assistant propmaster. And you are dead right. We had a few of the lenses that we would switch out depending on what the shot was. A cheaper knock off lens was used in wide shots and the leica was used for close ups.
Real journalists are hated by both political parties. Just look at Julian A.
Because both political parties are after the same thing and serve "American Interests" (making themselves richer and imposing power over the world in the name of "peace," "security," and "morality") which is all a lie. Fake journalists are loved by both parties because they serve the status quo by inciting culture wars, distrust in fellow man, and painting vile politicians as celebrities who care about us.
Both sides don’t hate him. Maybe the politicians on both sides but most people want to know the truth, not cover it up. Unfortunately the criminals are in charge and don’t want us to know what they’re up to.
Julian A didn't pushed for mass immigration, wokeness, to take parental rights, for mutilation of teenagers, etc
maybe the center hates him. But the far left and far right both like him very much from what I have seen
Amen
A movie about the dangers of sectarism being hated for not being sectarian. Interesting.
Exactly. Great point.
As always, this was a pleasure to watch. Your videos are fantastically written and produced, sir. Thank you for putting the time in to ensure your content is of such high-quality. As a fellow creator, I have a great appreciation for all the fine details you strive to include.
Appreciate it!
Your vids are also good. Subbed 👍🏽
@@ElvisDeckard Ah thank you, sir!
Mistrust in journalism isn't PARTLY journalism's fault. It is entirely journalism's fault. They lie to us all the damn time.
Oh yea? ALL journalists lie to you ALL the time? Or just the journalists that you follow?
@@axelotlgaming7921 ENOUGH of them lie ENOUGH of the time to foster mistrust. Like Walter Duranty and the Holodomor. No different today.
@@axelotlgaming7921 Ooh ! That hit a nerve.
@@axelotlgaming7921 enough journalists lie enough of the time to blow trust out of the water.
The 100's of murders with AR 15's has been true. The press has not lied about this!
Guys see Lincoln monument blowing up and they think to themselves, “hell yeah”
@@user-fv3vq4qq7m Those statues were not "Republicans", thats not why. C'mon now.
@@twt000 Lincoln was a Republican silly.
@@twt000 the Republicans weren't always as hateful and bigoted as they are these days. It was originally quite a liberal party.
@@twt000 history book.... you need one
@@I_Am_Warden They were technically Democrat actually, not the Democrats of today.
Still that was not the real reason the statues were removed.
My issue with the film is not that it didn’t pick a side - it’s that it didn’t show any side at all. You don’t have to choose a side to tell the nuanced story of the conflict.
Because they left out the context of the political conflict (literally gave us no history besides a 3 term presidency), the movie fell short for me. I felt it lacked substance.
Are you kidding? The situation by the end was pretty clear. Maybe you just weren't paying enough attention. It just doesn't spoon feed you the story.
@@benjix5500thats what im saying. seems like evryone has the comprehension skills of a 1st grader. The mentions of Antifa and the fact that the Bugaloo boys are in the movie ( the dudes with the hawaiian shirts) indicates that the context of the movie is based off the reality of the issue we have today in America . the fact the president goes for a 3rd term is most likely the reason the war started
Yea I thought the overall point was clear. Wars aren’t started by the people over political ideology. They are started by 1 or multiple leaders. Irl it is the same. Google most oil rich countries. And you will see a list of all the countries who either have proxies fighting wars over oil, or have been invaded over oil, or both. We didn’t invade Iraq over abortion or gun control I’ll tell ya that.
I'm the opposite, I thought it was the smart choice to leave out the "why" the war happened. A voiceover explaining how it all happened, or forced dialogue would have been contrived.
I feel bad for all the people who get hung up on California and Texas teaming up, the explanation for why is not needed for the story.
@fleshvehicle9140 as someone who 100% would wear a hawaiian shirt under my body armor if this happened in real life I loved their inclusion.
Camera clarification:
The Sony in the film is actually from the a7r series not the a7s series. You can tell due to the red “r” versus the blue “s”. Looks to me to be an a7r IV but could be the a7r V. This makes more sense for a photo journalist to be using with its higher megapixel count compared to the 12mp on the a7s III which is optimized for 4K video shooting rather than stills.
I was the assistant propmaster on the film. It was the Sony a7 iv r. We had to buy a second cam when the first one was broken during production. She also used a Sony a7 II as her second camera. The lens was real and Kirsten wore it during the entire final battle scene. With no photo double. When you see the tank drive past her, the tank is that close.
After a 4 days and some reflection as well as hearing some criticism and reviews of Alex Garland's new movie "Civil War," the most interesting part of it, and also, one of the parts that challenged me as a viewer, was that Garland refused to dumb the story down to make it easier to watch and comprehend the atrocity being displayed. THAT is filmmaking. And that is what has intrigued me the most since I watched it. A filmmaker actually refusing to make it easy on the viewer for once and making them think. I like it even more after.
You need a Story to begin with in order dumb it down
@ottersirotten4290 lol. Not everyone can handle thinking of course lol.
I felt the film pulled its punches quite a lot, compared to real civil wars. But the film would have probably been accused of being exploitative had it been more realistic. It did enough to be effective.
@@e1orac177 I think the "war" was just a plot movement device anyway. The focus was the journey. To me I mean of course. It is a roadtrip movie not a war movie;.
The movie must be doing something right that Russian/Chinese troll accounts are mass attacking it.
The timing of this film is pretty impactful faced with what is going on in society (globally) today.
Very much so. Hoping there is some impact of the messaging of the film against inciting violence or even a Civil War.
@@FrameVoyager yeah, I was thinking the same. Hopefully, those ones wake up and realize the bigger picture.
Its not an accident that this movie was made
I just doubt it’s going to have much of an impact. The people that already want this aren’t going to be swayed by a random movie.
@@larrygraham4875yeah, I couldn’t imagine stuff like this being made back in the day like 07
Great video! Good amount of depth and research.
Just saw it and can't stop thinking about it. It reminded me of black summer and many other apocalyptic shows but i think some of the scenes were just plain frightening. It focuses on human behavior and what people are capable of
The most funniest of the Civil War plot is that of Texas and Califronia forged an alliance it's like oil and water. 😂😅 Let's hope A24 gives this a trilogy or a sequel. This has the potential to be amazing
Umm that makes a lot of sense if you study history. Don't Forget ALLIES in WW2.
It is pretty hilarious that aspect of it. I think it could make sense if specific events happened, but I like that they throw that in there so it's not pitting certain groups against each other and making the film polarizing.
@@FrameVoyager It would be more plausible if the cartels influenced California and Texas by making their children and allies political figures in the country and then manipulated the system to start a war.
I don't think it's unrealistic at all. I think it's a reference to the fact that we all actually have more in common than we disagree with. A suitably corrupt and oppressive federal government would unite us against them.
Might seem funny on the surface, but I'm thinking Garland's point is that California and Texas forged an 'alliance of convenience', for lack of a better term. The three-term US president of the story is probably despised enough, even by Californians and Texans with otherwise often very different mindsets, that they're willing to unite their war effort just to depose said autocratically minded president. However, I don't think the internal geopolitical plausibility of the story is the main point, at all. The main point is what wars do to people, to society, to how people perceive each other and treat each other, to what sort of divides civil wars (and wars in general) create between people, between whole regions, nations, countries. All real wars leave behind trauma, in civilians and soldiers alike. Including in the people covering the conflict, like the group of journalists in this film, and real war journalists, the world over.
Of course, war is rarely about simple good guy and bad guy narratives, and the film is all about the toll of war on ordinary people and society as a whole. Like it or not, dying for particular politicians and what ideologies they represent is short-sighted. Ordinary people need to always bear in mind that we're living our lives to be good to each other and live fulfilling lives. Not to sacrifice lives for politicians or any other surface-level charismatic personalities.
I remember a famous Czech war journalist, a middle-aged man who's exact name escapes me right now, being interviewed on an afternoon broadcasting block I watched some twenty or so years ago. He spoke very openly, clearly, but humanely about his experiences with covering various conflicts that occured around that time, in several countries. Very grim subject matter and his dead-serious face said it all. His voice occassionally rang with grief when he talked about particularly gruesome things he saw first-hand. Even so, he felt he was doing important work, precisely to snap people out of apathy, and make it clear to them that war takes a very, very deep toll on any human society, regardless of country and culture. Snap people out of apathy about the human toll of those wars he covered, and make them appreciate just how important peace, coexistence, tolerance, democracy and equal rights are in a modern society. They are things we can't and mustn't take for granted.
This latest film by Alex Garland covers a lot of the same message: When we divide ourselves or allow ourselves to be divided, when we take peace, prosperity, democracy and daily coexistence completely for granted, we become more vulnerable to people who like to manipulate with spreading fear, anger, lies, trying to convince us we should hate each other and hurt each other. No individual human society has ever advanced if all it did was fight itself and try to destroy itself. They only truly advanced ahead when they stopped mutually excluding and bullying each other, and realised they need to live together and help each other as human beings. Not through forced compromise, but through mutually voluntary compromise, with an effort to understand each other and find common ground. Even in seemingly small things. Find common ground in the simple, seemingly small things, and then you can keep expanding that common ground to bigger things.
I saw this movie. It's too vague and incoherent to really make the impact that it should have.
A MUCH BETTER movie told from the perspective of journalists is The Killing Fields
It was directed by a documentary film maker and it won the 1984 Oscar for Best Film
Excellent review, as usual, buddy.
It’s strange to hear him say that this was a love letter to journalism, because I got the polar opposite of that while watching the film. I got lots of “Nightcrawler” vibes, and there were sequences in the film that made me feel extremely unsympathetic towards the journalists, very strange.
I have mixed feeling about Alex Garland, on one hand I like where his ideas come from, on the other hand I don't really like where they go, they just don't feel fully thought out. On one hand he was a writer first and apparently his great writing ability is what got him the directing opportunity, on the other hand his characters and dialogue aren't very interesting, having characters say "fuck" frequently that are supposed to be intelligent adults just to express that they are frustrated is kind of embarrassing to watch from someone that's supposed to be a good writer.
How does saying the fuck word have to do with the intelligence of the characters?
as an intelligent adult who often just says "fuck" to express frustration, I tend to disagree.
@@phoenixfunny4517 It's more the lack of intelligence of the writing wearing off on the characters. There's nothing wrong with having characters say the word fuck now and then, like in Goodfellas that's clearly the culture in which they speak, but I just finished his mini series Devs which is about an eccentric tech company and when I heard the mild mannered main character first say fuck I thought it was a little out of character because she didn't even have to vocalize her frustration in that scene, but then I noticed that any time a character reached a certain level of stress or frustration they would vocalize it and only by saying fuck and after a while it's just seems like Garland has to tell us a character is frustrated rather than just showing us and that he only knows one way to do it. It reminds me of how college kids seem like they have to use that word every chance they get
Cancel
Reply
@@K.C-2049 its fine once or twice in a script but when it feels like the only way he knows how to express frustration across a broad spectrum of characters it just seems dumb
Fascinating concept of an alternate American society, similar to the "man in the castle" series. An alternate universe of America's future.
Maybe if journalism wasnt bought out, we would trust them more! But right now…. Cant!!
It depends on what you consider journalism to be. It's still there, but there are a lot of "false journalists" who are just showmen. But you can still find real journalism today if you look for it. Problem is, most people don't want real journalism because it makes them uncomfortable
@@FrameVoyager Careful of that "True Scotsmen" purity. Just because they're bad or corrupt journalists doesn't mean they're not also journalists. To say otherwise risks burying the institutional problems of which they are a product or ignores the social role they occupy, just as cops who abuse their power are still regarded as cops, or bigoted/abusive professors aren't still tenured faculty.
Alex Garland rules. I am hyped for this film. Those I respect and opinions that hold weight to me are the ones calling it a potential masterpiece.
I'm amazed they were able to make this film for $50m
This is a great video. But I didn’t see anything that suggests controversy. It doesn’t appear to have been a controversial shoot despite your title. Thanks for the video though. Keep up the good work.
Appreciate it! When we say "production" we mean the entire process of it. If you read other comments on this video you'll see what I mean by "controversial" 😅
All I care about is the monitor hood on the Ronin 4D and where they sourced it - I can't find one online to buy!?!
How long has the war been going on at the beginning of the movie?
On thing you got wrong, is the camera Lee uses in this Film is definetley a A7R, because on the right side is a red R, that stands for Resolution. Being nerdy sorry not sorry;)
Oh I know it does 😅 I have those Sony cameras myself, I just wrote it wrong in the script and didn't catch it when I was editing.
Remember lads,there's 3d printed SAM missiles that could down an apache
Yes its gudied and yes they are dirt cheap
THIS (imo) is a cautionary tale...that despite which side (or where) you find yourself politically, we DON'T want this to happen here! We need to ALL come together and work at fixing the many issues that are dividing and hurting people in today's America. We need to find a way forward together! Here and abroad! Cheers! 😎👍
great video really planning on watching this
Alex Garland is not "quitting directing", he said in a recent interview that he is busy writing a couple of films for other directors so he won't have time to direct anything himself "for the foreseeable future".
This film was amazingly well done.
What I came away with most is human beings tend to live in rather isolated
boxes where others are either in or out. Our technology has ironically made us more
and more tribal as we can increasingly control when, where and how we interact with our
world and to escape eye contact and conversation with outsiders as we just go around
members considered outside our tribe.
What are we waiting for? We are well stocked and surround the cities. Let’s do this!
Well done!
Appreciate it!
I have so many problems with this movie, mainly given how contrary it is. Garland, being a non-American, not understand the country enough to tell an authentic story, as well as pretending like it's not bias when it's very clearly biased, while also lacking any bite had it simply been more open about its bias.
"Bad story telling preaches to the choir........"
Briliiant remark.
We have seen a lot of bad story telling within some of the biggest movie franchises in the last 10 years. That bad story telling has indeed been preaching to the Choir of Woke.....are in the minority of our population.
Glad you like that remark. But I will say, I'm not really talking about inclusion with that statement. I'd agree on the fact that studios have used minorities to make money off of them over the years, but the inclusion of other people, genders, and perspectives is essential in art. "Preaching to the choir" doesn't necessarily mean that the choir is on the wrong side, but if you want to effectively convey an idea, there needs to be more nuance to it. No one changes their mind hearing talking points they've heard a million times, change happens on a more nuanced and gradual level.
But in chalking individuals up to “the choir of the woke,” you end up increasing polarization which leads to radicalism.
I believe we as individuals have to recognize each other as individuals and not the enemy of the other side of the debate.
@Lucasmtyler Radicalism is the language of the people who want to take power. Then the next generation uses the same language to describe the those who took power from the radicals.
Rinse and Repeat.
I laughed so hard the first time I saw the title and trailer for this movie. I was like "This is the most centrist thing ever created that it can summon a black hole in the movie theatre"
Just saw it and "liked" it. I was anxious the entire time. It has a residual impact on me which is what I hope for from a movie. I don't nitpick intentions, I prefer to impose my own.
There’s been like 5 civil wars since 1700s that includes the movie. The movie is just a movie. A movie people say it’s not what I expect? The pres dies in the end. What do u mean? It has a beginning and an end. It’s exactly what I wanted.
"Don't look up" was a very polarized movie which was more or less preaching to the converted. The movie was big fun, but most likely you can count it as nice entertainment. With depolarized attitudes there is at at least a chance to reach people and make some change.
The problem is media and art literacy is an issue.You really do have to simplify concepts for general audiences
Oh, Mr Voyager, keep going. 💖
The hard part about journalism is just like anything else, once trust is broken it’s very hard to believe anything again. With the spring up of social media also being a platform to receive instant news (fake or not) it makes it very hard to receive truthful information unless you have objective journalists giving objective stories and not taking a side. This is the major problem and weak point of American journalism. So it’s mainly left up to yourself to do the research and hope you can put the pieces together. I’m sure this has been a problem since the dawn of time but it’s been completely shown more than ever in the last say 5-6 years or maybe earlier
Lee uses an A7 R camera, the R branch of the Sony A cameras, optimized for stills, brilliant camera for photos, superhigh resolution. The A7Siii is a hybrid mirrorless optimized for video, brilliant camera for video, amazing low light capabilities, stills are trash tho. Two very different Sony A7 cameras.
We all interpret it as big and small, all aspects. Not red and blue but purple going at it everywhere and thats what this movie portrays. CHAOS BABY!!!
Yo Voyager, I believe the Timing for a flic like this is really poor for now, so I won't be seeing this in a theater. Perhaps as a Philosophical Exercise I'll catch the disk, but the level of division that is occurring has taken Decades to reach this pitch and it's so disingenuous to lob an Indie movie at it and think you'll get much more than adding fuel to someone's fire afterword. Thanks for the Post, ~Mark~
I do like the passing of the baton from the older Journalist to the new Generation… implying that journalists must evolve and pass the so important mission of informing the people to the new journalists.
I’d like to use this film as a great example of something even more controversial than politics… the Full-Frame look is real… and you can easily see it on display here.
Full frame isn't real.
@@benjamindover4337 Like 24x36 sensors don’t exist?
I’ve seen movies like The 5 Day War and “
A Private War” that are based on real war journalist that when I saw this movie I have to admit that I wasn’t impressed and it was kind of predictable. The setting in a USA scenario didn’t throw me off what was evidently the outcome. The rest is the nonsense and stupidity of war and how useless and non productive it can be to any society. It reminds me of a Statement “In war, truth is the first casualty. “ Aeschylus
This film reminds me a lot of the bang bang club one of the best film about war photographers
I can see this film doing better internationally
Hope it does better than Beau is Afraid
The camera Lee used was the R line not the S line
It's pretty clear who Offerman is playing.
gotta say I really agree. This was good story telling. I really liked it! Taking a side just would have turn ppl off and been preaching to the choir as stated.
This video has good production value. Pretty slick.
I don't agree with the points of Civil War herein having a controversial production. Maybe i heard most of the points on other film analysis videos. Maybe these well worn points strikes me as another facet of advertising culture.
Alex Garland's heartfelt entreaty in this video about journalists and doctors will get standing ovations. Not from me. Doctors are not pure. Like cops there is a mainstream assumption that the people in these positions are good guys....and therefore it entices bad actors wearing a mask of respectability. The current age of doctors are fouled up with corporations corrupting health work into a for-profit thing. For example doctors getting extra money for prescribing people medication they don't need (that will harm them later). Doctors pushing for surgery on people who don't need it. People being denied health care for being poor. The practice of health care can be good but the universal saint hood assumed to doctors is as flimsy as it is for most politicians (either in the movie or in our reality)
I find fault in this discussion on the current age of journalism because it overlooks how information gathering and sharing is also largely profit driven. The bigger news agencies are owned by rich people. What we read is their truth. What most people call "news" is from people who learned the way to control and manipulate information. I believe more people ("media consumers") see this, feels this --and it contributes to a growing dislike of journalists. This is largely a misplaced scrutiny. To hyper focus a debate about journalists misses the other players behind the scenes deciding what is news worthy. The editors, the publishers and the advertisers have the most influence on what you are debating about over dinner. It's a sad reality that we inherited (and pass on) where if anything this video should champion....what Alex Garland should champion is free speech. Free Speech includes me as well as the fat cats. Civil War isn't controversial. The movie does not threaten/critique this world we live in--organizing this reality on a system of profit. A system of profit that rewards destruction of resources and life for the benefit of a few people. It does not threaten capitalism
its not a controversy. The film Civil War is a puzzle or game you play with when you're not working (for someone else)
You Upload About The Production Of The Fall Guy (2024)
As a Hongkonger i feel deeply sad for being misunderstand we as China and....🔥🔥😅😅😅
Politically yes....but😅😅😅you know..🤐
Nothing happened in tianaman square
@@thedarkdot2977Are you being serious?
@@Flamtion no
@@thedarkdot2977 yes
@@Flamtion bruh what
Maybe instead of trying to make a circle jerk pice that reporters are somehow the “good guys” maybe the director should have asked what the reporters have done in recent history to gain that reputation because as it stands right now for the last ten years juniors have been the direct enemy of a free thrinking nation.
One of the most visceral movies I’ve ever seen. Dunst’s best performance IMO. Jesse Plemons killed it…😂😂😂😂😂
It shoul of been Ohio, Texas and Florida. Not California and Texas?
*should have been
But then it would've been clear that it was Republican vs Democrat and there's no way Alex Garland was gonna let a Republican militia come in and take out a Democratic tyrant president.
Who would have thought subordinating truth to profit may have consequences.
Ikr ? Crazy ?
I love movies about stuff that'll almost happen in the next eight years.
lol highly unlikely. its a pipe dream for some small group that think a small group of disinfranchised people can stand up to the swat team even.
Then you might want to watch if you have not: New Order (2021) | Dir. Michel Franco
It baffles me that there is controversy about this film existing
You think Civil War is controversial? Pleasantville and the episode "The Weaker Sex" (Sliders) would be super controversial today thanks to the fact both lean into present day social politics.
I don't think it's controversial, but a it's being panned as controversial by a lot of people.
This movie was very sobering and honestly left me feeling very marked. Might be a new favorite for sure.
The best part about this movie is that it doesn’t pick sides.
Wagner Moura was amazing
I get why they did it but unfortunately, by avoiding real world politics, the film is basically science fiction and about as relevant as "Red Dawn". Texas and California allied so we're avoiding the notion of Red v Blue, the fascist president's party undisclosed so that people are going to insert the party they oppose into the role, etc. This was a chance for the filmmaker to really say something relevant and, while I admit I haven't seen it yet, it looks as though he surrendered that chance in order to not acknowledge the "bad guy" and alienate members of the audience.
You are exactly right. I walked out of the film and some good old boys with 2nd amendment shirts on were really jazzed about this "ant-war" film, truly irresponsible to play the both sides card and give a movie to glorify militias and killing the president who they can easily see represents Biden or Trump depending on your viewpoint. Alex Garland needs the safety of Sci Fi or "dream like" to cover up his really dumb ideas.
its a bad movie anyways, saw bits of it and said not gonna bother watching the rest
@@giovanni-ed7zq “saw bits of it and decided” wow you must be living a very fun life if you close yourself off that quickly lol
@@reedraeburn its a shit movie, if you dont see that, you been watching too many D movies. Its called having a brain and being objective if something is a waste of your time or not.
@@reedraeburn its not even Red Dawn quality.
The scary truth is that one could break out any day right now. Especially as the election guarantees at the least unrest.
Nah. If the next insurrection is armed it will be taken out very very quickly by the national guard
@@indigowendigo8464the national guard is on the side of the jan 6 insurgents
@@thedarkdot2977 lol yeah right. Stay in your basement trust me
@@indigowendigo8464 lol yeah right. You don`t sound too well informed. Stay in your attic trust me
@@paulcarfantan6688 I'm sure your ar15 will do great against the US military lol freak
Hope is not like Athena, beautifully filmed, but not much substance just vibes and aesthetic
Ok but there is a huge problem. How many people are going to take away the intended message? Isn't this just the perfect canvas for any dumbass to project their own conclusion onto?
The fact that he sees journalists as equivalent to doctors is a deal-breaker for me.
He doesn't, that wasn't his point dude. He used doctors as an example of a profession, pointing out that it's weird to say you hate EVERYONE with this specific job. In another interview he said the same but with, if i remember correctly, taxi drivers
It's called an analogy
@@kyleparker5564
Negative.
He clearly sees journalists as equals to doctors in terms of importance.
Do you have brain worms or something? That’s the takeaway you got from his quote?
It was a sony a7 IV r.
That's what I meant 😅 I just wrote it down wrong and didn't catch it
The controversial clickbait title of this video
I loved this movie as a warning where things are going.
I agree that by taking out politics and philosophy you are making a nothing film. There are plenty of better movies about war is terrible and should not happen (see the amazing “Come and See”). The reality is there are political, and especially economic reasons for every war. If we don’t understand it, we can’t change it.
I think this film doesn't take "everything" out, but Garland trusts the audience enough to understand some of it without having to spell it out to you. I think the difference between this and other war films is this is showing visuals of things many people in the country, 40% as a year ago, think will happen. I think it's a weird line to balance for sure, will be interesting to see how he walks that line in the film.
I only know the background of the director's ideas for the film from this video, but there are a few issues that I agree would make this movie not as impactful as he thinks it should be. First, people don't trust journalists because news is no longer news. "News" shows are opinion shows made for entertainment and the people on screen are not journalists. Most newspapers are geared towards an audience because that's what makes the most money, so the business people are the ones making the decisions on what gets published. There are very few journalists that are covering stories that are unbiased by profit motives that people get to hear about.
Second, there can be a side that is objectively bad in politics. The actual US Civil War was fought between one side that wanted to own other humans and one side that rightfully believed that was wrong. We're not going to have another civil war because one side thinks the healthcare industry should be regulated at the state level and the other the federal level. It will happen because one side wants to take away important rights from the other that they would rather fight and die to protect rather than give up.
I'll see the movie to see if it has any good substance, but if this is the basis for the movie, it really doesn't apply to our current situation.
@@jasons5916exactly. well put. haven't seen it yet but sure hope these issues are handled properly!
The film is a masterpiece with a very clear message. All of the choices made are for smart reasons IMO.
@@jasons5916 Exactly. Well said. "Let`s see California and Texas form an alliance because........they both have hot and dry weather. Okay, what else ? That`s it. That`s it ? Wtf ?
But the director doesn`t want you to know why they formed an alliance, he wants you to guess, he thinks he`s Stanley Kubrick.
But he`s not".
This movie sounds like a dud.
She used a a7r with a leica lens ☺️
I preferred DEVs that was some what relatable
The movie made me feel sad.
This movie was freaking brilliant and the final act is god tier.
By “Controversial” you mean “Predictive Programming”
I loved it
Everyone is ignoring that the tyrannical President is played by the same guy who played uber-libertarian Ron Swanson.
this movie is absolutely amazing it’s already one of the best movies of the year in my opinion
The box office is tanking, this is in its core a movie that has an extremly low appeal to the rest of the world. Its a movie about the usa and for the usa and only works there.
I highly disagree. It works at the very least for every western country with at least one powerful (as in could actually win elections) authoritarian party.
Plus, journalists and photographers are present in every country.
Trump and Biden memes going to be wild with that film 😮
Controlling the public here we go with this bs movie
i really enoyed the movie.. but that terribly filmed ending!! Ugh- i'm all for killing off Dunst's character, but fuck did they do a terrible job of filming her death scene.
i'm gonna copy and past the exact same comment about Duns'ts charachters death i posted on another vidoe.
"Lee's death was objectivley badly filmed. It leaves the viewer with one of two ways to see it: 1) Lee commited suicide 2) it was a bad attempt at using "film time/space" as Dunst's blocking and the mise en scene made it seem like Lee was either inexerpieced or chose to commit suicide by choosing to stay standing up in the middle of fire. Even amateurs/low iq individuals know to tackle someone out of the way of a moving target."
Marvel movies have the emotionally intelligence of a 5-year-old I am so sick of anybody referencing those movies as if they have anything interesting to offer.
Also, I loved this breakdown
" Unless Those Days Were Cut Short No Flesh Would Be Saved, But For The Sake Of The CHOSEN ONES (ELECT Rev 7: 9 & 13,14) Those Days Will End" Matt.24: 22: See >> Matthew 24: 12-14 & 21, Eph 6: 12 , 2 Tim 3: 1-5 ., 1 Cor. 15: 24,25; WHAT WE SEE HAPPENING HAS TO HAPPEN - 1ST Prophecy Gen. 3: 15 - This 7TH DAY ( Gen CH 2) will end soon > THE RESET > Rev 21: 1-4; PEACE Brothers & Sisters.
"Violence, extremism and revolution is...LE BAD, complacency, journalism and centrism is...LE GOOD"
Actual meme message kek. Movie glows hard
This comment is cringe as hell, even for me
@@overlordbrandon No one gives a shit what you think
Go outside bro
Go outside man. How embarrassing and disappointing it must be to be you. How hard is it to understand a civil war is bad ?