You Overlooked The Most Important Aspect of Your Gear
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 08. 2024
- The often overlooked aspects of your camera gear. We battle some wide angle lenses for Sony and answer some photography questions. Zeiss Batis 18mm f2.8 vs Sony 20mm f1.8, Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 and my new baby Voigtlander 21mm f1.4.
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll have wide angles to film flattering portraits of ratboy.
Thanks for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f
Sony A7S III amzn.to/4eUMWqc
Zeiss Batis 18mm f2.8 amzn.to/3XOnkW9
Sony 20mm f1.8 amzn.to/4cuA4FS
Voigtlander 21mm f1.4 amzn.to/45Wf2NG
Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 amzn.to/4crDhWP
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com...
Instagram / vegetablepolice
Topaz Video AI for enhancing and slowing down footage! www.topazlabs....
Remove Mucoid Plaque in 1 DAY to improve digestion! zencleanz.com/...
My Monkey Strength ebook payhip.com/b/VyEG
My Music from videos! Entire Discography 15% off vegetablepolic...
Patreon for Monthly Q&A Videos / vegetablepolice
T-shirts and merch! vegetablepolic...
Random ass donations to paypal.me/vegetablepolice Thank you!
Q-Link Products changed my life! share.shopqlin...
My Health Channel Vegetable Police / @vegetablepolice
My MMA channel UFC Conspiracies / @ufcconspiracies
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, you'll have wide angles to film flattering portraits of ratboy.
Thanks for your Bitcoin donations :) bc1qacvd72s9565hpat4jueeultha3qvrv4kznyl3f
Sony A7S III amzn.to/4eUMWqc
Zeiss Batis 18mm f2.8 amzn.to/3XOnkW9
Sony 20mm f1.8 amzn.to/4cuA4FS
Voigtlander 21mm f1.4 amzn.to/45Wf2NG
Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 amzn.to/4crDhWP
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
12:58 Thats proove that a few invention were inventions itself, others were just thrown in a humankind side.
Zeiss 18 superb
5d mark iii perfect by itself, it even has 1080p all-i or you can even get 1080p 14bit uncompressed raw with a mod called Magiclantern that's easy to use and unloads the data to the CF and SD card. You can also get fancier resolutions and blah blah blah but all you need is the 1080p from Magic lantern because it essentially looks like the c100 mark II but in a 5D mark iii body.
Second thought get a 5d Mark ii anyway, it has a vintage look and color science that you just can't get anymore, but ironically while I was looking, both the 5d mark II and III are the same price used lol
A thousand thanks for the Fuji Answer, much appreciated 🙏👍📸❤️
I've seen a few XT4s in excellent condition go for under a 1000usd on ebay recently
The side of the room with the negative space is the PERFECT composition for one of Kasey’s jump scares 👽 😂
That Voigtlander is indeed special ❤
The lens is everything, wise words.
Just wanted to say thanks for creating content. It 's so much more interesting then just stats and specs being spewed.
The redwing blackbird footage in slow motion was incredible. When I tried it, he pooped on my glasses .
That zeiss wide angle lens looks amazing 👍
ZV-E1 rules. You can get a Amazon EVF thingy you kinda place on the back screen and works in a pinch for outdoors/nailing focus. I like using it more than my a7siii now…esp after the update bricked it 😅 lol
I have a pile of cameras but really love the look my GH6 produces. My Sony is lovely but feels more Docu whereas the GH6 feels Cine.
@@collapsingruins it s currently an absolute bargain but it is also the most unloved M43 camera ever made. If you need solid AF then the G9mkii or the GH7 may be a better option. For taking photos, making videos for you tube or making movies with friends it’s perfect 👌 plus the colours beat all my canons,Olympus,Sony and Dji cameras. In my opinion :) - anything I film, I look back at and smile. I’ll never sell mine.
@@collapsingruins the mkii has the new Panasonic phase detect AF system so you won’t get pulsing etc in the background using AF, it also has a host of features included with the GH6 though I don’t think it has a fan so you can’t record for eternity like you can with the GH6. I think the streaking issue that the GH6 has is also sorted in the G9ii but tbh after what three years or so I’ve never come across it anyway plus 90% of the time I use MF so phase detect makes no odds to me. The G9mkii and the GH7 are both great cameras but apart from real time LUTs not enough to sway me from the GH6 maybe if they do a GH8 with 8K and A7Siii lowlight capability then I’d be grabbed :)
@@collapsingruins 5Dmk2 is one I love 🥰 but as for 8k lol I mean for future. I remember buying my first pentium 75 and ordering a 1GB HDD the guy in the shop said “you will never fill that”! :D one day 4K will be classed as potato and only on $20 Walmart dash cams maybe not just yet though haha.
You right. Lens is most important element. Lens is thing that creat an image. Sensor is just a photosensitive layer.
I have a6700 and the Tamron 150-500. It's a nice little wildlife set up 😊
I had that setup as well. I sold both. I think IS on that lens is terrible because it is kind of competing with the camera.. Anyway great combo.
He said everything about Fuji correctly. Good advice.
Gear-wise, it's all important. I like to think of it in terms of audio production. You can't regain quality downstream so any down sampling in the pipeline will limit the fidelity of the final output. If any one thing is important, it's the performance/subject. But yeah, microphones and lenses are probably the most important pieces of gear. They need to be comparable to the human senses, and are the start of the capture pipeline. This is all such gray area though.
As a Fuji owner, I wouldn’t touch the XT4, had it and the auto focus was horrible! XT5 all the way!
Why would it be horrible
That's right, Kasey said, X-T4 (26mp) is good for video, and 40mp on X-T5 is not good for video.
The X-T5 is a camera specifically for photography. (as well as X-H2 with a 40mp sensor)
And on the X-T4, the autofocus is quite a good working autofocus.
@@Sky-ne5gn
I was referring to the auto focus in still photography. Unless you have the linear motor lenses, the XT4 👎.
My dinosaur of a photography teacher used to tell us about the three L's that we had to rescind at every morning meetup in class, LIGHT - LENS - LOCATION.
Nothing else mattered, it was all the things we ever needed to remember, get it right there or go home was his moto as he taught us how to use DSLR's way back in the early 2000s.
He absolutely hated those things because it made photography too easy he said, people would take bad photos and try correct them in post, rather than trying to spend more time to take a good picture to begin with. And I start to see he was right all along! Canon 1Dc is waiting for you Kasey, gorgeous 4k 24p image, the sensor in that camera has insane micro contrast by the way, proven by the 3D Pop cult forums which seems to rave about how legendary the camera is even with a plastic kit lens it produces good results.
Did it have live view? How heavy was it
I read that as you had a dinosaur for a photography teacher.
Dyslexia strikes again
@@unbroken1010
Canon 1Dc does have liveview on the backscreen, you can get those LCD viewfinder adapter that were popular in the day and use the LCD back as a viewfinder.
Its over 1kg if I remember for body alone + the lens makes it almost 2kg.
A sensor should facilitatie the lens and maximize light gathering. Therefore a perfect camera should have a square (or round) sensor. Extra advantage would be you could always hold your camera in te samen position. Maybe this 'open gate' thing will lead us there one day?
The answer is always zeiss. Well sometimes it’s voightlander apo, but usually it’s zeiss.
Huawei had 7680fps*. It really does seem like phones have gotten worse but the cost has doubled.
Oh theres so much on phones, not just related to video recording that has been removed. My samsung galaxy note 4 felt like a swiss army knife and now the latest "flagship" doesnt even have the same features. Its just sad. Software and battery is better but otherwise its like we are regressing to simple communication device again.
I think my next purchase will be a z30 with voightlander prime
The Voigtlander and the Sony look very similar, the Zeiss looks completely different, almost like you used different lighting.
Sony is pretty awesome but I’d take a long look at the latest offerings from Panny Boy.
Sony expensive offerings are awesome, Panasonic is arguably only good for S5M2, G9M2 and GH7, which are like 1400 - 2500 euro section, the S5M2 being real cheap for some reasons on used market, Canon is also pretty solid, Canon R6 is a pretty good camera for the current asking price. Just avoid all RF glass.
Relax p Diddy boy 😂
@@unbroken1010 ?
@@MillennialDiligence-sx8re we know how you sagger lovers roll
@@unbroken1010 I'm so confused at what you are referring to.
Bring on the Voitylander!
this whole time you made it seem like you was natty but u has been on Gear the entire time!!!!
Solid info coupled with all sorts of hilarity. Love it. Also, the Canon EF 50 1.2L, and the 200 1.8 are worth a sniff as well.
The Voigty 21 is the winner to my old eyes, though I'm not sure the difference from the 25 justifies losing autofocus.
I applaud your take about the lens being everything, by the way.
PS, got a message for you on the latest episode in my channel.
25 was better IMO
Be real and keep the SEL20F18G. It's the only fully native lens on your A7SIII with autofocus and stabe. It has very good image quality. Nobody is going to complain about the lack of 3D pop. Most people can't see it and your viewers claim it doesn't exist.
It was in this video when he showed the flat rendering that I realised 3D pop is real after being a sceptic for so long.
@@Carl-Camera It's not visible in this video, it's just the power of suggestion.
I concede it could be placebo effect and I do agree keeping the Sony native lens would be wise
The lens system I fell in love with was the Carl Zeiss 16, 21, 28, 35, 45, 90 I bought with a Contax G2 in 1995. I loved the lenses so much I waited and waited for digital rangefinder equivalent cameras came around. My obsession with these lenses saved me from small sensor pain. I adapted them to the Sony A7 and A7Siii. They have a really beautiful quality. Still , not as high resolution as modern Zeiss. The current Zeiss glass is much better. I have the Batis 18mm and Zeiss 55mm 1,8, which truly rock and I would never sell them.
Never sell your Zeiss glass. Only G Masters are perhaps better.
So how will the Sony GM lenses compare to the Zeiss lenses in terms of 3D pop? I haven't seen Kasey review the GM lenses so I'm not sure what to expect.
I just know that the Sony lenses I have work great, so I haven't thought of buying a different brand, but I'm considering it now.
Like should I get the Zeiss 55mm 1.8 or the Sony 50mm 1.4 GM or even the 50mm 1.2 GM? Will the Sony lenses have the 3D pop of the Zeiss?
If you have time for one more question, is there any difference between the Zeiss UK/CAN lens and the US lens? Will the UK/CAN lenses work on my US Sony camera?
I don't know if there's a regional lock or something similar to that for cameras and lenses.
Thank you very much for your help.
@@iamionscat9035 Check out reviews with full size images on a large size high gamut display.
Gotta try the Techart stuff, revolutionary
Hair is on point 👌🏻
Can’t stop watching your videos.. love them so much, provides me with so much entertainment and giggles.. you do something than can only be achieved with such lack of understanding of how technology (and the world for that matter) works.. i always look forward to my daily dose of cluelessness and playfully funny ignorance and I hope you continue for a long time to come.
Oh bro....I have a 1dx mark ii, a 5dsr and a 5d......love the look on all of them. Lol. I'm telling someone that knows...
Yeah man its all about the lenses 1st, and then video quality comes after that. That voightlander 21mm 1.4 has some pop, I could see it in the end, yes there was a dimension opening up behind you and around you. Hard to believe a lens in one brand can best a lens from another brand that are both made in the exact same factory at Cosina.
The Voigtlander 21mm looks pretty good.
You overlooked the most important aspect of your gear: the person behind the camera. 😁👍
I think as a health channel, the Voigtlander 21 is the one you look the most healthy on-screen.
Also, am I alone thinking that apparitions from the dark would be a nice touch?
watching everything in pre-deselected cinderella 720 glass slipper-lense .. and just here for the jokes. he's in an ocean of gear options. khob khun krup
Honestly, I can't see any difference between Voigtlander and whatever you used before it, but damn are these videos entertaining :)
Something rarely touched upon is that so much of the high-tech that was brought forth in the last 70 years was never on the drawing-board anywhere. It was all just announced as 'look what we've invented'. It's as if Bell Labs (amongst others who shall remain nameless) had a direct link to some tech that was either ultradimensional, interdimensional, or extra-terrestrial. Mankind didn't go from steam engines to lasers, nukes and IC's out of their own ingenuity in a timespan shorter than a generation. Anyone who studies civilizational progress through the ages could tell you this, but I guess they never look.
Musk is the current front-man for releasing this tech while putting a human face on it.
I'm just beginning and know I want to start with full frame but I do have a budget. What are your thoughts on Sony A7 iii vs. Canon EOS R8? Thanks for your videos. I want to be able to vlog (mostly talking head, shooting b-roll on my phone) and take some wildlife and landscape. I like the Canon for the video and the Sony for the stabalization.
I had to watch the video a second time because I was mesmerized by the awesome hair of Kasey. Bro this is the best haircut you've had so far, don't change it. Rock it!
I’m ready for the next arc where Casey explores skincare and makeup. Or just gets a Canon camera.
@@rickdg If he puts on lipstick.. I'm OUT!
had many laughs, thanks for that ❤
A7S3 was the first to have 4k 120 or HD 240 with AF and all with 10bit, I immediately got it and never looked back.
It was that revolutionary for the time and for a Sony mirrorless that was sticking to 8bit for a long time
"the lens is *everything* ", that's why I bought a D780. I think that you should try one.
I do aviation videos with a Sony RX10IV, considering upgrading to a Lumix GH7 or a Nikon Z6III. Sensor size doesn't matter to me, I'm after stabilization and decent dynamic range since I shoot during the day mostly at airshows. Which would you recommend based on your experience?
Hey Kasey, I want an XT5 with 70-300 for wildlife/birds and plane spotting, and the 23mm t1.4 for everything else. What you say or my proposed setup?
I saw the recorded version of the question, which asked about 16-80mm and 70-300mm lenses. I've got both, and an X-S20 body. I love the focal length versatility of 16-80mm, and its constant aperture. Bokeh quality is quite pleasing (for a zoom). The 70-300mm is a nice lens, but I have trouble with focusing / tracking, this could be very much a user's error, or that I am trying to shoot (photos of) Western house martin birds, which are among the fastest ones in my country.
(this is another comment attempt, looks like the first one got auto-deleted, because it contained a link a gallery)
Casey,would you like to have a Nikon Z6III?….I have two and only need one to go along with my 2 Z-9’s
Let me know.
I'm listening lol. vegetablepolice@gmail.com
Not fast enough,it’s gone.
"....we killed Fred..." LOL! "Once you find something, yes, there it is"........until G.A.S. happens! 🙂 I've been patiently searching for a wider vintage lens to use on my X-T3. I have a Canon FD28mm T2.8 but want something wider that doesn't cost a fortune. Thanks for the morning laughs, have a rockin' weekend!
A used fujinon 14mm 2.8 if you want the 21mm FF equivalent. Goes for around 350. It's one of their first lenses so that's kinda close to vintage. I think it's a waste to use a fuji camera and not have a fuji lens on it. Same as using a Canon and not using EF glass.
I hear you on the G9ii vs A7S iii. But we cant forget that the Sony is 2X the price of the Lumix.
Join me in my quest for ef glass acquisition. Currently broke from lens hunting so 5diii with magic lantern open gate is all i can afford.
Question: I have usm50mm T1.4 and usm28mm T1.8 and i am looking for something that is 1. EF 2. Wide 3. Fast 4. Lacks LD glass for the tonehhs
Ty
i represent that fact i bring home pineapple pizza crumbs, if my wife is lucky
The Sony A7Siii is a technological masterpiece. 😀
I want to buy Nikon Z6 III because viewfinder, also that slim pro adapter and the Zeiss Batis 85mm to shoot portraits of my beautiful family. I'm I stupid and why? Should I go adapting Canon EF instead?
Why don't you just get a Techart Pro Autofocus Adapter for your manual lenses? Then you could go 3-D pop microcontrast crazy with M-mount Voigtlanders!
Yo I saw you had a second channel and I don't remember what it's called please share it. I seen it months ago about a microphone and I lost the page
When did you get so badly sunburned? 😂
@cameraconspiracies Where do you field the question you answer in these segments?
morons send them in to him so he can insult them with his limited knowledge
How’s that 600pf treating you? I’m debating on getting it.
If you can handle the crop 7DII and the 90D might offer you some interesting options for wild life, the original 7D was a bit of an upgrade from the 5DII for frame rates, I can't remember what the magic lantern firmware offered to 5D II shooters. 7D had fantastic colours but no autofocus just like the 5D in video, 7DII, 70D, and 90D all offer autofocus in video, the 80D does as well but I hate recommending 80D to people, just saying 80D make me feel distracted and makes it hard to focus. of course if you got that camera making the announcement that you now officially have 80D might earn you "special consideration" from the rest of us over thinking perfectionists with obsessive technical hobbies and massive over consideration for anything remotely interesting until .....SQUIRREL!
70D has the nice touch to focus capability on the screen which for a videographer was a godsend of a dream feature
@@silbay Yeah I like this on the 5DIV as well but the data rate in 4k is bonkers I think you get about 30 minutes on a 128GB card at 500 Mb/sec shooting Motion Jpeg.
Philip Bloom was so disappointed when it was released I don't think he even considered shooting it to review, it was just that disappointing, colours are beautiful and I know lots of people get gorgeous footage with it but I just don't have the kind of storage I would need if I was shooting what interested me daily.
Not first.
There is only one thing could make phone good for video - a dedicated record button with zero delay. That's fun
Hey Kasey. Curious here, for your vlogging use case, do you see a case for using 32-bit float audio?
32 bit?
I would think YES. Rough neighborhoods with the usual gunfire can drive that audio needle into the RED frequently. 32bit audio gives you the headroom to deal with them unruly dBs. Tell'em Casey👈
If you’re recording jets and still wanna hear people talking maybe. Other than that, its nothing setting your gain on 24bit wouldn’t solve.
@@JojoJoget says how much you really know about audio recording Skippy. Only 8 bits difference, LOL. 32 bit 192K is pretty much standard in the audio world anymore and has been for over a decade, cameras have a hell of a way to catch up.
I was on the street corner, out on the street corner,
Not like I care to know the time and
Not like I'm looking for that silence
Self diagnosing 'til I'm borderline
I tried out 2 switch monitor docks and I ended up out here on the street Olympics.
I never said it, but I know that I
Can't picture anything past 25
In the small pucker row I'll do whatever helps to sleep at night
Until I'm feeling like an island
Until I'm strong enough to hide it
What was I thinking looking for a sign? Out on the street corner
As if I've ever seen the stars align
Somebody take over the drive and
Somebody notice how I'm trying
Got a 13.3 1080p oled for me
Crazy glue the dock and nunchuck charger with an aluminum bar,
Out Here On The Street _Tonight_
Got muh mod chip,
When I'm toeing that line all of the time
Calling it fine, calling it fine
Toeing that line all of the time
Calling it fine, calling it fine
How do you call it when you're in your head?
Like when you really keep inside of it?
I only talk into the mirror
I'm only scared of getting bigger
*_Out here in the Light_*
In the middle somewhere (The middle way 🙏is the only way)
Hilarious…..the hair on fire joke channel!!
Actually, what is the correct plural form of Zeiss Batis? ™
❤❤❤
Can recommend a 6D with Magiclantern for (nearly) 1080p lineskipped raw. Much better for photos though; Nice colours, despite frustrating auto exposure (but I want cameras to clip shadows and only overexpose specular highlights, don’t kniw about newer cameras, but this era of Canons shoot to keep everything in the middle at the expense of all else)
What about the 5D4? Its got the best middle ground of older sensor and digic tech, but enough modern conveniences like AF in video and all-I. My 5D3 lacks continuous AF in video, which is a bummer for that EF glass.
your right bicep looks fatter than your head in the voigtlander around 12:56
Yeah the 25 was much better because voigtyboy had strange perspective proportion weirdness - thanks for helping me realise why I preferred the 25
Don't sell your gear Kasey, give it away. You're gonna be just like Matti Hapojaboy making a buck when you're already a multi-millionaire.
Is this guy still making videos?! Not sure why he stopped appearing in my recommendations or I might of blocked him two years ago 😂
It is his decision.
If he buys new and sells used, he loses already. If he both buys and sells used, he may get back most of the investment.
Don't be that greedy.
@@ralfjansen9118 He can do whatever he wants, but he did criticize Matti Hapojaboy in the past for selling his used gear and stated that he should be giving it away. Now he's in a similar position where he is receiving gear for free and profiting off of it. Also if you've been watching his channel long enough, you would know that he almost never buys gear brand new.
@@ralfjansen9118you stand corrected
The annoying thing about that guy was he was selling it for more than the sticker price. Like people should pay just to use something he blessed with his touch.
Does FE mean full frame e-mount? Or does it mean Flat Earth?
Flat Earth of course you scrub (in a nice way of course :)
Flat earth is 🌈
Your wallet will be Fully Empty
Why is it so dark in your house? Are you filming in a dungeon? The dungeon of photography losers?
The somber mood is to make photographers reconsider their wayward course and to seek the path of enlightenment.
Relax p Diddy
@@unbroken1010 👀💀
I love the idea of you getting a canon 5D to use with your lenses
@@christinasmith9032 I’ve owned a 5D mki, ii, and a iii, as well as a 6D. I only have the 6D now. It’s the most versatile and lightweight one of those tank like bodies. 6D mkii is a bit more versatile but also more weight.
Oh how I miss yesteryear's and the world of 120 film.
Samsung S22 ULTRA is a great phone if you need that upgrade.
I think the relevance of the A7S III can not be denied by anyone who knows, the fact it hasn't come down in price even used is pretty evident it still has some serious value and utility.
That said I have some interest I have not yet dug deeper into in Lumix offerings, I especially like the idea of anamorphic desqueese in camera.
I've heard the autofocus with adapted Canon EF glass is really good too.
The Nikon 85 1.2 still has more 3D pop than any lens you’ve shown lol
So would you get the Sony Zeiss 55mm 1.8 over the more recent Sony 50mm 1.4 GM or the Sony 50mm 1.2 GM?
Also is there any difference inside the lens between the UK/CAN Zeiss 55mm and the US versions? Are they the same? I've got my eye on one of these but I don't know if they are region locked like DVD players or blu-ray or something.
Thank you for your help.
Kasey ignore all GM on pupose I think. They are very costly, razor sharp, lightweight, small, etc. I only have lucky chance to get 24F14 GM and despite a bit of spherechromatic and focus breathing it is something out of this world, almost Zeiss but lighter and all modern Sony features supported.
@@AABB-px8lc Thank you! I really appreciate the reply. I was wondering if it had the 3D pop that he covets or it would be wiped out by how sharp it was.
So if I could afford the GM lenses should I get them or I should get the less expensive Zeiss lenses. That's what I'm trying to figure out.
Thank you again for your reply.
@@AABB-px8lc I'm still very new to this thing (photography) and I'm just dipping my toes into vlogging so I'm still in the "doing my research" phase. So I really appreciate your help.
@@iamionscat9035 3d pop in terms of Zeiss is combination of lens property, that make zone near focus very smooth in transition and keep razor sharp in focus plane across frame same time. It hard to achieve from engineering point of view. very few teams make it, like Zeiss and Leica. In addition, image very far from focus is Gaussian smooth, no "donuts" like circles with darker center. All GM lenses are very different, some have very strong "3d pop" like 50F12, some less. Lens that I have 24F14 definitely have that property, some tell main design idea was exactly very nice far blur, a.k a "bokeh" but area near camera before focus is not that great, so it have "offset" to prefer main character and background scenes that it perfect. Other lenses have different tuning, prefer close area like macro but not good background, some very expensive have both same (cinema Zeiss $20000, not for us mortals). You better grab one and see before spend money.
In my inexperienced, barely informed camera world, I suspect the continuing situation you notice in mfgs pulling back on camera features is all due to overheating. Overheating became such a huge profit killer for mfgs that they quit the intense features rather than suffer the purchase returns and bad press. At first they thought they could sell the market a "little" overheating and get by- it cost them a lot to learn that lesson. As miniaturization and weight reduction squeeze all the air (that helped cooling) out of devices, and fans contribute to size, noise, and battery drain, their only solution is to drop the features that cause heat. And those features are the very ones your filming style demands/desires. Am I right or wrong?
You've really upped your studio game with the lights. You don't look like trash any more. 😀
zeiss
You look skinny on Voigtländer.
Using old canon glass from an AE-1 50mm 1.2 with a manual adapter on my Sony 6400 and A74 and the colors are just amazing. Razor thin focus is a btch 😂
NAW, AM GOOD
WITH SONY
and KEEPING NIKON
and CANON
THEY ALL HAVE THEIR PURPOSE 🎓
Relax p Diddy
3D Pop Explaned:
czcams.com/video/lCbieyC0TAw/video.html
for those who haven´t seen it ...
Oh goodness
Almost all full frame hybrid bodies suck for video, like 4k60 with a 1.5 crop shouldn't even count, that's misleading customers, how do they even dare to mention it. Put a t1.4 23mm on a 6700 and you have a FF equivalent of 35mm t2 in 4k60, but the full frame bodies turn your equally as compact 35mm t1.8 into an ugly 53mm t2.7. So a7IV, a7c2, Nikon Zf, Z6ii, hell even a7cR can't do proper 4k60, they need to step up their game, APSC kings like a6700 and X-S20 beat them and come it at under €1.5k lmfao
Photographers are like ants....they can carry ten times their bodyweight in gear 😊😋
First
🌈 Relax p Diddy
So the rumours are true about the Sony A7S4?
Trouble with
Camera Companies
If it ain’t Broke
They Fix it anyway
Removing Features
Great to Have
And adding Useless
ones that aren’t really
Giving More.
All While Charging more to keep photographers Miserable 🤪
The A6700 is the best camera ever made. Yes the A7SIII is better, but it doesn't have all the AI autofocus capabilities the A6700 has.
LOL
Ai sack topping
Don’t need ‘AI AF’ if its not be able to AF because there’s not enough light
@@JojoJoget Why would there not be enough light if you're taking pictures of birds?