The Massive and Hardcore Machine Gun System that Pulverized Any Kind of Ship

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 27. 08. 2023
  • Play War Thunder now for free with my link, and get a massive bonus pack including vehicles, boosters and more: playwt.link/darktech_
    In the heart of World War 2, where chaos reigned and the fate of nations hung in the balance, there stood a formidable guardian of the seas: the Oerlikon 20-millimeter Mk 16 autocannon.
    This battle-hardened defender played a pivotal role, aiding Allied ships in their quest for victory.
    But as the tides turned and technology evolved at a rapid pace in the latter half of the century, the call for innovation echoed within the ranks of the United States Navy. In the late 1970s, a relentless pursuit began to find a successor, a weapon that would redefine naval dominance and unleash unprecedented power.
    The selected machinery was the Mark 38 25-millimeter Machine Gun System, a revolutionary shipboard weapon system designed to safeguard warships from an array of surface threats, with a particular focus on agile and swift adversaries.
    Despite being initially designed by the United States over forty years ago in the 1980s, the MK 38 has proven its mettle time and again over its decades of service,
    During its career, this model would serve as an even more imposing weapon than its predecessor.
    In all its variants, the Machine Gun System has showcased unparalleled versatility in adapting to ever-changing warfare scenarios, from small vessels to unmanned aerial vehicles.
  • Věda a technologie

Komentáře • 206

  • @DarkMilitaryTech
    @DarkMilitaryTech  Před 10 měsíci +6

    Play War Thunder now for free with my link, and get a massive bonus pack including vehicles, boosters and more: playwt.link/darktech_

    • @duanepigden1337
      @duanepigden1337 Před 10 měsíci

      How long does the laser need to focus on the target?

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Před 10 měsíci

      @@duanepigden1337 it takes 3-4 seconds to take down a missile... I guess a plastic boat will a fuel tank must be less...

    • @Wooargh
      @Wooargh Před 10 měsíci

      as a professional gamer I have played literally thousands of games but never have I played a game as incredible as War Thunder click the link to play today

    • @duanepigden1337
      @duanepigden1337 Před 10 měsíci

      @@user-McGiver -- thanks. Just thought, would a reflective surface defeat a laser?

    • @aaronbryan2480
      @aaronbryan2480 Před 10 měsíci

      Don't play the game you'll get viruses

  • @RealStuntPanda
    @RealStuntPanda Před 10 měsíci +6

    4:51 "With unparalleled precision..." Um, are we watching the same video? Because I think I saw one hit and a whole lot of splashes that are everywhere but the target.

    • @LeeHarris
      @LeeHarris Před 9 měsíci +2

      yeap, I was thinking the same!

  • @geforce4
    @geforce4 Před 10 měsíci +18

    i worked on one in '94, no remote or automated controls back then. passive laser scope, sure was fun as hell to shoot.

  • @TheBillyBlack
    @TheBillyBlack Před 10 měsíci +5

    Funny that you tie the Cole incident with the need for an upgraded chain gun. The damn CO of the Cole wouldn’t have used it if he had it.

  • @DJNitreBlue
    @DJNitreBlue Před 9 měsíci +4

    And what he forgot to tell you that the damn thing was a maintenance intensive nightmare and the damn things were ALWAYS breaking, Couldn't get though a single pac fire with one of em breaking some internal component. Now the M2...Never had issues with em, ammo yes, guns, no. Super reliable.

  • @Anonymous______________
    @Anonymous______________ Před 10 měsíci +48

    Note: This is not a machine gun, it is a chain gun. There are significant differences between the two.

    • @kevinblackburn3198
      @kevinblackburn3198 Před 10 měsíci +3

      Correct!

    • @makegaminggreatagain3907
      @makegaminggreatagain3907 Před 10 měsíci +7

      Note: It would have been nice if you taken the time to explain the difference rather just critiquing.

    • @JohnnyTromboner
      @JohnnyTromboner Před 10 měsíci +1

      ​@@makegaminggreatagain3907it's all about the external motor used to drive the action (usually connected to it by a chain or belt) instead of using propellant gas or other internal mechanism

    • @gazbags9136
      @gazbags9136 Před 10 měsíci +4

      ​​@@makegaminggreatagain3907you make a video explaining it, if you know so much instead of critiquing

    • @dgthe3
      @dgthe3 Před 9 měsíci +1

      @@gazbags9136 How about you tell everyone how to turn a simple pair of basic definitions: "The cycling of a machine gun is powered by the propellant gasses. The cycling of a chain gun is powered by an external motor.", into a video. Ya know, instead of critiquing.

  • @4catsnow
    @4catsnow Před 10 měsíci +20

    They should tailor the Phalanx with an optical gunsight if they're serious about close encounters. That makes this thing look like a semi-auto pellet gun.

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Před 10 měsíci +3

      BRRRRRRRRRRRRRAT..... !

    • @abikeanditsboy3449
      @abikeanditsboy3449 Před 10 měsíci +2

      So you're thinking an optical sight would help them shoot down UFOs?

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Před 10 měsíci +3

      @@abikeanditsboy3449 so you're on drugs too!... that makes sense!...

    • @videoviewer2008
      @videoviewer2008 Před 10 měsíci +2

      Do you mean the PHALANX TRACKING PEDESTAL offered by L3 Harris? "The Phalanx Tracking Pedestal combines rugged, high-precision electro-optical instrumentation with the flexibility to serve on a variety of vessels and weapon platforms. It offers superior close-in fire control performance in a small, reliable, lightweight, easy-to-maintain system"

    • @dgthe3
      @dgthe3 Před 9 měsíci +1

      @@videoviewer2008 No, the 20mm CWIS gatling gun.

  • @georgedreisch2662
    @georgedreisch2662 Před 9 měsíci +4

    Add programable fused ammunition to this, and they’d up the hit probability a bunch, for air burst capability on soft targets, plus reduce the probability of cross fire incidents, like in confined areas like ports.

  • @MRptwrench
    @MRptwrench Před 7 měsíci +1

    My words cannot express the wonder I feel to be alive during the time where weapons grade lasers are utilized, nor the pride I feel that it is my beloved United States that has made this a reality, along with an appreciation that my Marine Corps' favorite water taxi, the USN that helped develop the system.

  • @DeliciousDeBlair
    @DeliciousDeBlair Před 10 měsíci +3

    They should just put the GAU-8 Avenger out in its place, seeing as the USAF is purported to be shutting down the A-10

    • @dgthe3
      @dgthe3 Před 9 měsíci

      Why? That gun isn't particularly accurate & the targets aren't armoured so a bigger round doesn't really add anything. Its lower muzzle velocity so its going to be trickier to get an accurate shot at long distances. If they want to send more rounds down range there are plenty of 20mm Phalanx guns that can be used. Plus, that gun is gigantic making it difficult to mount & even harder to track on a moving target.
      So no, they probably shouldn't use the GAU-8.

  • @Ungood-jl5ep
    @Ungood-jl5ep Před 10 měsíci +41

    Of course the Navy would call a chain driven auto cannon a "machine gun."

    • @mikesiver1950
      @mikesiver1950 Před 10 měsíci +13

      Well, technically, it IS a machine.

    • @Neeboopsh
      @Neeboopsh Před 10 měsíci +3

      @@mikesiver1950 ;) i lolled. such a dad joke

    • @shootlootscoot510
      @shootlootscoot510 Před 10 měsíci +3

      ​@@mikesiver1950 well damn, can't really argue with that logic 😂

    • @captain1334
      @captain1334 Před 10 měsíci

      @@mikesiver1950 Technically, my penis is a machine.

    • @WolfeSaber9933
      @WolfeSaber9933 Před 10 měsíci +1

      Probably because the gun can be manned compared to the weapon being on an automatic turret for other systems like the Apache.

  • @BSPIVEY100
    @BSPIVEY100 Před 9 měsíci +1

    If you sink a boat full of pirates, why rescue them. Let the sharks have them.

  • @DrugzRailz
    @DrugzRailz Před 9 měsíci +1

    This former..20mm Vulcan gunner says " I LIKE IT" !!...Dam things got a f@#$% lazer ! ...hell ya !!!!

  • @mountainjeff
    @mountainjeff Před 10 měsíci +4

    That's pretty cool. "5 megawatts by mid-May."
    I wonder if it passes the "common use" clause of the 2A.

    • @Legitpenguins99
      @Legitpenguins99 Před 10 měsíci

      Regardless the government restricts the intensity of all civilian lasers

  • @nicholasmazzarella2720
    @nicholasmazzarella2720 Před 10 měsíci +1

    Dark
    Great video as always. Thanks for giving me something to listen to when I am working.

  • @Revile2nr
    @Revile2nr Před 9 měsíci

    love how it poops the empty shell casings out the front

  • @synkraut9633
    @synkraut9633 Před 9 měsíci +1

    So the early version had a range of 7400 yards and the mod3 had a range of 8400 feet? I think the US should adopt the metric system if they think this is an improvement…

  • @bobuncle8704
    @bobuncle8704 Před 10 měsíci +5

    Any chance they make a mount for the bed of an F250? I wants me one of them 😂

  • @joelrunyan1608
    @joelrunyan1608 Před 10 měsíci +1

    Frickin love this channel

  • @davidrobertson5700
    @davidrobertson5700 Před 9 měsíci +1

    Enemy swimmers ? It is used in executions too ? Or are they really fast swimmers that can catch a ship ?

  • @zeusandathena4094
    @zeusandathena4094 Před 10 měsíci +5

    ALL your channels never cease to amaze the viewers. Well done 👍👍

    • @kevinblackburn3198
      @kevinblackburn3198 Před 10 měsíci +3

      With their inaccuracies

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Před 10 měsíci +1

      @@kevinblackburn3198 Here's the trick.... he's doing it on purpose so we jump in and correct him... Algo Rules All...! lol

  • @MZ-bl6wg
    @MZ-bl6wg Před 10 měsíci +5

    As we continue developing AI defensive programs like the one the Phalynx CIWS uses it’s only going to get better letting AI use its 26.5 BILLION tasks PER SECOND ability to calculate offsets , ship roll and movement etc it’s going to continue to make our ships and everything safer and safer

    • @ryanw724
      @ryanw724 Před 10 měsíci +3

      Until they turn on us...😂

  • @fjb4932
    @fjb4932 Před 10 měsíci +1

    "Pirates tried in Norfolk "
    How many millions did we give them before sending them home ?
    I never saw even one swinging from a yardarm !

  • @bipolarspock6145
    @bipolarspock6145 Před 8 měsíci

    When it comes to war thunder I marvel at the amount of classified information that is leaked because of that game

  • @lancerudy9934
    @lancerudy9934 Před 9 měsíci

    Great video thanks 😊

  • @smith5312
    @smith5312 Před 10 měsíci +2

    Did anyone else notice that we never actually heard the weapon in question fired once? We know everything about except what it sounds like 🤷🏻‍♂️

    • @therealboofighter
      @therealboofighter Před 10 měsíci +1

      Bang bang and pew pew.

    • @smith5312
      @smith5312 Před 10 měsíci +1

      @@therealboofighter ah, so it sounds like Star Wars. 🤣.

  • @WDMtea
    @WDMtea Před 9 měsíci +1

    Wonder if those lasers can cause wild fires?

  • @geoffdickey3761
    @geoffdickey3761 Před 9 měsíci +1

    The video is about a “machine gun” but you show a picture of a Rail Gun on the add.

  • @torchofkckch.2928
    @torchofkckch.2928 Před 9 měsíci

    Hmmm......
    Makes me wonder exactly how
    much brass that the navy dumps
    overboard per year, not just in
    combat situations, but also in
    training as well ?

  • @thomassicard3733
    @thomassicard3733 Před 9 měsíci

    "... maintaining peace, aboard the vessels of the... "
    LOL!!!
    Maintaining KICK YOUR FRIKKIN' ASS-ETS.

  • @stevebailey325
    @stevebailey325 Před 9 měsíci

    0:14 the guy is casually chewing gum while shooting down zeros. 2 bad.

  • @The38alt
    @The38alt Před měsícem

    Man imagine if they captured those bullet shells they could recycle them into new bullet shells. But no they gotta drop to the ocean.

  • @shanevernon-do5jk
    @shanevernon-do5jk Před 10 měsíci +5

    Is it possible to estimate the wastage of brass in millions of tons, by the US military?

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Před 10 měsíci +1

      well, some other ''ding-dongs'' prefer to wear their brass on their chests...

    • @maryannfalcione2194
      @maryannfalcione2194 Před 9 měsíci

      It's policed up and recycled, at least when I worked on the range at Stone Bay that's what happened. Shooters policed it up, it was then brought on carts to a place where it was sorted, and recycled.

  • @carguybikeguy
    @carguybikeguy Před 10 měsíci +1

    That thing is terrifying! Now the Mk V will feature full ai. Then, they strike. Hahaha!

  • @hackmedia7755
    @hackmedia7755 Před 9 měsíci

    does the sailor get a "I smoked a pirate" patch?

  • @marlixholdings3318
    @marlixholdings3318 Před 10 měsíci +4

    I’m not sure if the video depicted is the actual shots fired during testing but it sure seems to me the gun is missing the target. I see splashes all over the place for such an ‘accurate’ gun. There even was a video edit switching from the boat to the scene of the boat on fire.

    • @galatians-2.20
      @galatians-2.20 Před 10 měsíci +2

      I understand why you think that. They walk the rounds up onto target. Also some rounds pierce through while some deflect and strike the water near boat. I've watched a lot of footage that looks like Misses but actually ended up being dead on. I'm not sure if it's just camera angle or what

    • @arieldahl
      @arieldahl Před 10 měsíci +6

      you are misunderstanding the terms being used.
      using weapons on Board is inherently complicated due to the changing movement speed and direction of both the attacking vessel and the target, the rocking of the ship on the waves and the rising and falling of the ship with the swell of the waves.
      as a result of the motion mentioned, in many cases an operator may use a "strafing" technique that runs through the target guaranteeing the hits.
      a good way to tel the difference between an accurate vs inaccurate gun is if the rounds land in a clean grouping or a straight "stitching" pattern or if the rounds are spreading out randomly.
      this can be verified if you took an oerlikon gun to a standard shooting range, the rounds will spread out over a radius from the target.
      a remotely controlled bushmaster mk.38, on the same range, could easily hit all its rounds within a 4' by 4' target at 3000 yards.
      additionally, when remote controlled, the rounds may land not on the digital crosshairs of the electronic scope - so the user can input milliradian corrections that would correct the alignment with the following rounds landing on target.

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 Před 10 měsíci +1

      Accurate it is not! Or the gunner needs more training. So what is it?
      I understand they are at sea with both moving in three dimensions yet that hit pattern is ten times larger than the target. Some of those rounds are way off.
      I can't tell how far they are shooting though or if the footage is showing the enhanced version.
      Just wow... Can't believe people are saying they are walking the target when they clearly are on target since rounds are going way above, below, and almost hitting before going off again.

    • @arieldahl
      @arieldahl Před 10 měsíci +1

      @@dianapennepacker6854
      It’s mixed footage so it’s hard to tell the difference between the manually operated guns and the electronically stabilized remote controlled guns.
      My experience is with firing the typhoon RCWS system (which is built around the bushmaster m242 gun)

    • @matchrocket1702
      @matchrocket1702 Před 10 měsíci

      If you look at all test firings from all those types of guns from different navies, you'll see the same pattern. It's not just that weapon.

  • @davec5153
    @davec5153 Před 9 měsíci

    I thought they were changing to the DS30M MKIV The newer mark to the one the Royal navy uses.

  • @clarkdavis5333
    @clarkdavis5333 Před 9 měsíci +1

    All I see, is all these guys missing everything.

    • @Se7nDust
      @Se7nDust Před 9 měsíci

      Storm Trooper Academy

  • @PanioloBee
    @PanioloBee Před 10 měsíci +1

    Wonder if AI would improve accuracy and response?

  • @FrankTheTank417
    @FrankTheTank417 Před 10 měsíci

    Matt Damon?! 😮 9:54

  • @jamesstepp1925
    @jamesstepp1925 Před 10 měsíci +1

    All it needs is an AI interface to fire it. Humans identify the target and authorize force, every round will be through bullseye instantly.

    • @jamesstepp1925
      @jamesstepp1925 Před 9 měsíci

      18yrs of an IT career and four years of military, 19D Cav Scout, but current no direct experience with AI. That being said if we have CIWS shooting down supersonic missiles autonomously then I fail to see how the same kind of target acquisition systems could not handle far slower targets with the same accuracy. It also begs the question, what is your practical experience with AI and target acquisition systems?

  • @JustReed
    @JustReed Před 10 měsíci

    40 rounds!

  • @adr1uno638
    @adr1uno638 Před 10 měsíci

    0:58 the gun is ejecting unfired cartrigies 🤔

  • @TheBruces56
    @TheBruces56 Před 10 měsíci

    It would be more appropriately referred to as an "Auto Cannon" than a machinegun.

  • @keithd5181
    @keithd5181 Před 9 měsíci

    pulverised.

  • @ondrejhumplik69
    @ondrejhumplik69 Před 9 měsíci

    I have only minor notes. It's a video about a weapon system and not a weapon per se.
    And as for the weapon, it is not a machine gun, but a small caliber automatic cannon.
    According to the international definition, machine guns are fully automatic weapons up to 20 mm, realistically today the maximum calibers are 12.7 mm / .50" and 14.5 mm / .57". A machine gun is definitely not a 25 mm / .984" caliber weapon.

    • @ondrejhumplik69
      @ondrejhumplik69 Před 9 měsíci

      @@retiredbore378 Maybe marking practices differ from country to country, I thought it was standardized.

    • @ondrejhumplik69
      @ondrejhumplik69 Před 9 měsíci

      @@retiredbore378 It's not our fault, but rather an American simplification. Because even in the past, European armories still distinguished rapid-fire cannons and machine guns.

  • @themenace4017
    @themenace4017 Před 10 měsíci +4

    Unfortunately I am under the belief that the Naval Assets of the USA are woefully inadequate of attacks from Chinese and others whose plans of massive MISSLE launches at our ships that cannot be properly defended against at this time, maybe to a smaller degree but not after the 2nd, 3rd or more attacks especially if the ship sustained any damage

    • @SB-qm5wg
      @SB-qm5wg Před 10 měsíci

      I agree

    • @vimmentors6747
      @vimmentors6747 Před 10 měsíci

      ​@@SB-qm5wgThe flaw in your thinking is that the weapons the US acknowledges are usually about 20 years behind what they actually have. Combine that with an unwarranted belief in CCP propaganda, and it's pretty clear that China ends a few hours after any attack on Taiwan.

  • @robert2375
    @robert2375 Před 9 měsíci

    how much does each of those mark 3 shells/bullets cost?

  • @staggerinstanton56
    @staggerinstanton56 Před 9 měsíci

    Why does this sound like the dod, trying to make the rest of the world more confident?

  • @SuperBenzN
    @SuperBenzN Před 9 měsíci

    How is this and it's predecessors a "primary" naval weapon?

  • @martinblank1484
    @martinblank1484 Před 9 měsíci

    Wouldn't this be classified as an autocannon?

  • @RonValdes
    @RonValdes Před 9 měsíci

    Yep 10 million on a Honda Civic we are going to run out of money

  • @user-kq4hf8se5b
    @user-kq4hf8se5b Před 9 měsíci

    According to US whistleblowers, aliens and America teamed up to build weapons.

  • @jimcoldham105
    @jimcoldham105 Před 9 měsíci

    I can't understand that most of the time the spent casings are falling overboard, not very cost effective as these can be reused.

  • @GauntletKI
    @GauntletKI Před 10 měsíci

    Put the A-10 gun in there 30mm

  • @anza77
    @anza77 Před 10 měsíci

    Why isn't those brasses collected..... Brass is pretty expensive metal....

  • @peterweller8583
    @peterweller8583 Před 10 měsíci

    Snuff said

  • @TrevorNet
    @TrevorNet Před 10 měsíci

    Talking about fishing with dynamite…

  • @andrewhayes7055
    @andrewhayes7055 Před 10 měsíci

    Not going to worry an Iranian swarm attack!

  • @bloodybritbastard
    @bloodybritbastard Před 9 měsíci

    "Equipped with an eye safe rangefinder". Of course. We would not want to hurt our target before we deep fry it with a 60kW laser then fill it full of 25mm high explosive rounds!

  • @buffalosoldier7360
    @buffalosoldier7360 Před 9 měsíci

    Where’s the rail gun shown on your page?

  • @BeingFireRetardant
    @BeingFireRetardant Před 10 měsíci +2

    Pew, pew, pew... ssszzzZZZAAAPPP

  • @auro1986
    @auro1986 Před 10 měsíci

    now you have that phalanx and you have this manual gun?

    • @Ungood-jl5ep
      @Ungood-jl5ep Před 10 měsíci

      CIWS is mainly for an anti air role.

  • @petekirwin2420
    @petekirwin2420 Před 9 měsíci

    Great gun but can’t believe they just dispel the spent cartridges into the sea. Recycle

  • @jamestotten3536
    @jamestotten3536 Před 10 měsíci

    Give me a bushmaster that can shoot 75mm projectiles and I’ll change the world…

    • @jantschierschky3461
      @jantschierschky3461 Před 10 měsíci

      There are plenty of 76mm naval guns, with excellent capabilities.

  • @trumanhw
    @trumanhw Před 10 měsíci

    impressively hits water that's kinda close to targets. Not ONE ROUND impacted a target during this video (except on land).
    If it can't hit targets over 95% in PRACTICE, it SUCKS! 99% should be the minimum for computer controlled chain gun. wtf.

  • @gorethegreat
    @gorethegreat Před 10 měsíci +1

    I love this channel

  • @josephvanwie6706
    @josephvanwie6706 Před 9 měsíci

    The ship has to stay afloat to fire and the Russians will sink it before they can put their lipstick on and get ready for company!

  • @gren509
    @gren509 Před 10 měsíci

    Gets about 1 hit in 500 rounds - something is wrong with this design !

  • @1911Earthling
    @1911Earthling Před 9 měsíci

    Can I by one for the back of my ford F150?

  • @brianholland2916
    @brianholland2916 Před 9 měsíci

    Yet drug boats make their destination in high effect???😮

  • @hughgrection3052
    @hughgrection3052 Před 10 měsíci +1

    Anyone know how well these newer C-wiz style turrets hold up to actual enemy fire?
    While I know they work great, but I wonder how resilient to something that actually shoots back for once lol.
    It's not like guns in the past that had large armor shields. They kinda look pretty exposed. Maybe it's been so long since any shot back in a substantial manner that they just quit doing shields?
    But yeah seems like one round to the optic head would render it null and void?
    But I guess they have other weapons that are armored on board for it that happens. I hope lol

    • @Whateverpoopiepants
      @Whateverpoopiepants Před 10 měsíci

      You make it sound like shooting this accurately would be easy.
      The enemy would have to get through a fair few perimeters first.

    • @hughgrection3052
      @hughgrection3052 Před 10 měsíci +2

      @Whateverpoopiepants As in what exactly?
      I'm asking because in actual battles vs other ships like it, or land based ports etc... they shoot back.
      Accuracy? Well, bombs and missiles have a radius that's pretty darn big. Accuracy isn't as hard as many think. Volume of fire alone can make any weapon system "accurate" enough. Lastly, many larger systems have proximity fuses. So any time it senses it's close to a target it will air burst. Thus making it very, very accurate. It's how we won vs Japan in the pacific basically when we invented the proximity fuse.
      So with all that being said, that's why I simply asked. I'm not saying the ship is defenseless at all. As I said they have armor plated conventional guns that will surely take a beating.
      I'm just wondering how long one like this actually can tho. I know it's not considered a primary system. But yeah just seems a little frail yet still. That's all. Then simply asking if anyone has seen how much damage they actually can withstand if needed. So I know it's fine for 99% of what we need done these days. But some areas seem to use this style system on land based turrets as a primary defense system. It just seems to me it would be rendered useless pretty easy if someone actually attacked it. If all that makes any sense lol

    • @thatfeeble-mindedboy
      @thatfeeble-mindedboy Před 10 měsíci +1

      @@hughgrection3052->> … I think the whole thing was partially driven by taking the actual gunner and removing them from exposure; operating the weapon from within the ship itself. It’s hard to imagine how sensors such as those could possibly be armored to any great extent without rendering them blind. It may be that they routinely carry spares of any part of the weapon that kind of sticks out; or is in a vulnerable position in general, so it might be a simple matter of disconnecting a couple of cable connectors, and removing some bolts to have the gun back in operation. When it comes down to it, anything that endangers a piece of hardware, even an expensive one, instead of endangering a sailor’s life is something we should do. Americans are kind of funny that way, right?

    • @nomercyinc6783
      @nomercyinc6783 Před 10 měsíci +1

      the ciws and the land version arent designed for combat where the enemy equipment fires back. its a defensive weapon. not an offensive one.

    • @Whateverpoopiepants
      @Whateverpoopiepants Před 10 měsíci

      @@hughgrection3052
      Never mind, you seam to know it all !

  • @duanepigden1337
    @duanepigden1337 Před 10 měsíci +1

    Doesn’t seem to be very accurate.

  • @ericsonhazeltine5064
    @ericsonhazeltine5064 Před 10 měsíci

    What happened to the guys tried for piracy?

  • @mikeg4163
    @mikeg4163 Před 9 měsíci

    Looks like turds pushing out ..spent shells…. Come on ..we were all thinking it..

  • @josephwheeler1
    @josephwheeler1 Před 9 měsíci

    I love seeing this kind of stuff but lose the clickbait.

  • @nurullulu2819
    @nurullulu2819 Před 10 měsíci

    Bambum bambum bambum bambum . Why not rrrttttt rrrrtttttt rtttttttttttt tanng tang tang tang tang

  • @chillindave1357
    @chillindave1357 Před 10 měsíci

    👍 Here's to maintaining peace... our d@mn way! 🙂

  • @DavidJohnson-cv3uh
    @DavidJohnson-cv3uh Před 10 měsíci

    Biggest question I have is. If it can be controlled remotely from the safe interior of the ship, why were the operators wearing all the gear as if being outside? Is it because they might have to go outside to service the weapon?

    • @danieloloughlin408
      @danieloloughlin408 Před 9 měsíci

      Looked to be a training session for the operators of the gun, so you would dress as if the ship was on a war footing.

  • @BSPIVEY100
    @BSPIVEY100 Před 9 měsíci

    So where was the gun in the thumbnail.

  • @jantschierschky3461
    @jantschierschky3461 Před 10 měsíci

    Well, it's not a machine gun. It is a freaking cannon. 20mm and above is a cannon. Get it right.

    • @marcwilliams9824
      @marcwilliams9824 Před 10 měsíci

      It's not a machine gun but it's not because of the caliber.

    • @jantschierschky3461
      @jantschierschky3461 Před 10 měsíci

      @@marcwilliams9824 well military terms are clear, but in a sense you right is a chain gun. But also a cannon

  • @robinraphael
    @robinraphael Před 10 měsíci

    😂 mechwarrior would be proud... still waiting on those to happen😮 wheres the giant robots at damit 😂 Elon is probably on it

  • @m_b4
    @m_b4 Před 10 měsíci

    @11:37 "Ukraine" how much are they paying you?

  • @Freakcent
    @Freakcent Před 10 měsíci +1

    I really like your channel and watch all your videos, but could you please also add the metric measurements in your videos?
    For all the people living outside of the United States, Liberia or Myanmar...

  • @user-iw1zs5ug6y
    @user-iw1zs5ug6y Před 10 měsíci

    I don't play games. Not condemning any gamers; just not for me.

  • @rkirschner7175
    @rkirschner7175 Před 10 měsíci

    FAFO. 🤔🙀😈🦅

  • @timothyparker9810
    @timothyparker9810 Před 9 měsíci

    Until you get a milliwatt laser you're never going to have a chance to shoot down any UFOs or you a piece or whatever you call them now you have to surround the laser beam with a dual magnetic fields spinning in opposite directions you need a very good computer to run it cuz the fields have to spend very very fast almost the speed of light you know there's no moving parts that this switches on and off at the speed of light I can show you how to build one if you don't know how but I will not contact you you could find me if you're serious

  • @hsiewert1312
    @hsiewert1312 Před 9 měsíci

    Like the content, not so much the narration.

  • @jons4917
    @jons4917 Před 9 měsíci

    absolute clickbait image, showing an experimental railgun. SMH

  • @brianholland2916
    @brianholland2916 Před 9 měsíci

    Tax payers WHO????😊

  • @leaningr
    @leaningr Před 9 měsíci +1

    Clickbait, the rail gun shown in the thumbnail was not included. Disliked.

  • @sammykhuri1885
    @sammykhuri1885 Před 10 měsíci

    The problem with your videos that you talk very fast

    • @ryanw724
      @ryanw724 Před 10 měsíci +1

      The problem is you

  • @britishpatriot7386
    @britishpatriot7386 Před 4 měsíci

    More incorrect information.

  • @rogerpartner2648
    @rogerpartner2648 Před 9 měsíci

    I gota say. It NOT ACCURATE. The vid shows a speed boat at 750 yrds. The rounds are all over the ocean. Not one hits the red Speed boat. . Give me a 50cal any day.

  • @ianpatterson3061
    @ianpatterson3061 Před 9 měsíci

    Nice photoshopping on the video thumbnail

  • @mashfenko1983
    @mashfenko1983 Před 10 měsíci

    Who's fighting the USA !

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Před 10 měsíci +1

      WHO?....Worlds Health Organizarion?...

  • @mikeypiros6647
    @mikeypiros6647 Před 9 měsíci

    Alot of BS on this one...

  • @thebigone9781
    @thebigone9781 Před 10 měsíci

    Coping russian, haha ukraine dont want nato and American military equipment because it fragile compared to soviet or russian, everything from sams to howitzer to tanks, nato tanks on varm day and colder night electronics dosent work. Zelenski said in Norway to all nato countries please digg for soviet era military equipment because that I wrote above

    • @onionhead5780
      @onionhead5780 Před 10 měsíci +4

      👌 NATO weapon systems are too fragile yet they’re still decimating Russian equipment. 🤦‍♂️ The only thing Russian equipment is good for is scrap metal. 🤣 You’re funny.

    • @mountainjeff
      @mountainjeff Před 10 měsíci

      Yeah. We'll just send cash. Wink, wink.

    • @user-McGiver
      @user-McGiver Před 10 měsíci +1

      there's a beautiful show of ruZZo-Zoviet equipment in Kyiv... you should go and watch it before the Ukis turn that scrap metal into the new tank the Rheinmetall factory in Ukraine is making to replace the updated Leopard 2....

    • @jantschierschky3461
      @jantschierschky3461 Před 10 měsíci +1

      Nice try bot