Cheque bounce trial|Supreme Court latest judgement|S.139 NI Act

Cheque bounce trial|Supreme Court latest judgement|S.139 NI Act ‪@rahulsadv‬
#138niact
#chequebounce
#supremecourt
#chequedishonour
#chequebouncecase
Case details: Tittle ‘ John P Jose vs Santosh’ SLP(crl) 5241/2016, date of decision 10-11-2022
links of other useful videos on the Cheque Bounce case:
• Supreme Court Judgemen...
• How to Negotiate with ...
• Cheque bounce offence ...
• when cheque amount mor...
• Blank cheque| one cann...
For more information or legal advice, you may contact [e-mail].
Disclaimer: The video is for sharing information and must not be construed as legal advice.
______________________________________________________________________________
Queries
Can 138 notice be sent after 30 days?
What is legally enforceable debt under 138 N.I. Act?
Is 143A N.I. Act mandatory?
What is the notice period in 138 N.I. Act?
What is presumption under section 139 of NI Act?
What is statutory presumption of negotiable instrument?
Is Section 143A of NI Act mandatory?
What is presumption consideration?

[@SachinSharma-ou8hj]

Excellent

[@aspakkhana1402]

सर मेरा 10 साल से चेक बानस का केश चल रहा था वो केश मे हार गया हारने की वजह ये रही की बेंक ने जो चेक के सात मेमो दिया उस मै बैंक की सील तो लगी है पर उसमे बैंक कार्मचारी के सीघ्नेच नही तो Cort ने मेरा केश खारिज कर दिया इसमे मेरी तो कोई गलती नही है ना ये तो Bank की गलती हुई ना तो क्या मे एेसे मै क्या Bank के खिलाफ कानुनी करवाई कर सकता हु Bank की इस गलती की वजह से मै 10 सालो तक कोर्ट के चकर कटता रहा मानसिक अौर शारीरक रूप से पीडित हुआ पैसो की बार्बादी हुई

[@virendrakumar8095]

Good information

[@ajaymalviya6846]

Respected Sir, I am being implicated in a false check bounce case by a person. I received the legal notice he sent me on 1 February 2023. But he filed the case in the court on 23 March 2023. After about 50 days. So in this case limitation period has been violated or not? Please tell whether I will be able to get the benefit of this?

[@rajkumarjanglani3009]

I want to know about security cheque.

[@rahulsadv]

Supreme Court Judgement on security cheque bounce|138 NI act
czcams.com/video/G4tQxg1lV5I/video.html

[@mehukon9667]

Sir complainant...cash diye he and cheque mile he iske upar koi judgement..cash ka koi proof nahi ..bharose pe diya tha

[@rahulsadv]

That’s tricky, First presumption is in complaints favour and accused can shift burden by proving that complaint doesn’t have the financial capacity and has also needs to explain the cheques given to complainant.

[@rahulsadv]

I’ll soon make a video on this.

[@mehukon9667]

@@rahulsadv sir complainant have capacity.. financial able but accuse deny that not received cash etc etc

[@rahulsadv]

@@mehukon9667 if he does not received cash then why he gave cheque

[@mehukon9667]

@@rahulsadv true sir but if accuse advocate ask questions about cash arrangements.. showed in itr etc than

[@basuh7526]

Presumption is only a assumption it's complainant who has to produce documentary evidence

[@amarsinghbayas5589]

Sai mera bhi 1 case hai 2 lakh ka
Samne wale ko notice bhej di hai.
Aur aaj 15 din ho chuke hai koi jawab nahi diya.
Call par kaha bad me bat karte hai.
Kya notice ka jawab na aane se mere case me muze fayda hoga ?

[@rahulsadv]

Yes of course

[@deviyanibenshah9996]

@@rahulsadv Kya fayda ho sakta Hai sir?

[@pardeepduggal3431]

Koi khas fayda nahi hota, bus bola jata hai ki aap ne notice ka jawab nahi diya, aap ki soch achi nahi thi, or sub case ek type me hi chalte hai, notice le ya na

[@rahulsadv]

@@deviyanibenshah9996 not replying to notice will adduces the presumption in complainant’s favour that accused has liability towards complainant thats why he didn’t reply.

[@mehukon9667]

Sir supreme court ke judgement ki link dijiye na

[@user-qg1dh4qn8h]

श्रीमान केस नंबर और तारीख नहीं बताया आपने

[@rahulsadv]

Tittle ‘ John P Jose vs Santosh’ SLP(crl) 5241/2016, date of decision 10-11-2022

[@RaviKumar-xz4oq]

Aapka mobile number milega mujhe 138 NI act ke bareme puchna tha Mai cheque bounce ka complainant hoon