Does This Tasmanian Tiger Evidence Change Everything?
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- A clip from the Animal Anomalies podcast in which we discuss the best evidence to support the Tasmanian Tigers continued existence past 1936 and even to the present
Adamsfield Thylacine Detailed Article
www.wherelightm...
Get Wildlife With Cookie Merch
wildlifewithco...
Support The Channel
/ cookie6994
Follow Wildlife With Cookie
/ wildlifewithcookie
/ cookiewildlife
/ wildlifewithcookie
/ wildlifewithcookie
/ discord
All copyright free music by
www.epidemicso...
I did a bad job telling this story but it’s one that I believe is the most likely since 1936. Please view the whole story here: www.wherelightmeetsdark.com.au/examining-the-evidence/tasmanian-tiger-(thylacine)/adamsfield-thylacine/adamsfield-thylacine-further-evidence/
You should probably make another video specifically showing the photos, since it seems a lot of people can't find this pinned comment
Rusty Morley is my grandad, sadly passed away last year
Can you tell us what changed your mind as you have a previous video saying you think there definitely gone! I promise they are always close to the very big cat type creatures!❤
You’ve sold yourself short. I understood every word.👍
I can relate to this story
As my sighting is also mentioned on Light meets dark website, the Grampians sighting on January 12th 2012.
However years later once My IT friend uploaded the Thylacine photographs into windows photo viewer. The time and date stamps said it was the 10th of January 2012 not the 12th but anyhow apart from that discrepancy everything else about my sighting is accurate.
Only a few photos were sent to Parks Vic and DSE and all my photos were photos taken of photos.
That way the the owner of the photographs being me preserves the highest resolution pixels and as found out later and the original data stamp associated with the photos.
Any shared photos with people are photos of photos.
This story seems believable.
Bit if a shame someone who shoots one doesn’t have the balls to come forwards as a dead specimen is hard evidence and at least if shot on the mainland would break the government’s misinformation model of Red Mangey Fox.
A dead thylacine would certainly prove their lies wrong.
As I’ve always said it’s not the sightings that count it’s he who counts the sighting’s. And when you have Grampians Ark funded by government money to 1080 bait 230,000 Hectares that money probably has special interests attached to it.
Any reports of thylacines need be misidentified as a red fox and squashed so the professor of biology from Deakin university can keep validating himself that he is doing the right thing for the environment by killing feral predators.
If you choose to identify a thylacine as a fox then you can keep up the killing and keep the money coming in.
I guess if my photos were acknowledged to be true and correct then the professor along with DSE and Parks Vic would perhaps try cover up the evidence as they may fear ridicule for the death sentence they imposed on the Grampians Thylacine.
Same way the shooter of this story wants to cover up a thylacine death.
Government officials are worse and I say that first hand from experience.
Pack of cowards who lie through their teeth with false claims that the stripes of my thylacine were of a mangy fox that lost its fur from mange in what appears to be stripes but are not actually stripes.
This is the nonsense performed from he who counts the sightings.
Yet there is no evidence or photographs of any fox world wide losing its fur in stripes yet their lack of evidence of a fox doing that is reason enough to say my thylacine photos with stripes are not a thylacine with stripes it’s a fox with stripes.
So no evidence of stripes on mangy foxes is evidence of stripes on Mangey fixed yet my evidence of thylacines photos with stripes are not evidence of a thylacine with stripes.
My guess is perhaps they own shares in the 1080 bait program as stripes are apparently not stripes.
This is the Australian Government
Who ordered its extinction in Tasmania then built the dingo fence on the mainland and baited and continues to bait everything across the eastern seaboard.
Just Deny and lie and continue to enjoy the 1080 bait money.
Grampians Ark is a death penalty on the thylacine and the professor of biology is the leading factor in the death sentence imposed.
In July 89 I saw, close-up, an adult Tas Tiger on a hilltop north of Murrurundi, NSW. Large yawn (180*) and it eased away into the tall grass. No one was interested. 30' away. Fearsome.
I live in Tasmania and I believe that the Tasmania tiger still exists, if I took a photo of one I would never publish it as there are too many wierdos out there who would want to catch it or kill it. Love the show 💜
Maybe people have taken picture of one u know a full view of one but never told anyone cause they were scared someone would kill it or put it behind bares like they did to poor Benjamin
True. Even the government with they protected laws for animals can be more dangerous.
Scientific consensus: We havn't had any confirmed sightings of the Thylacine since the 1930's. No photos, no videos, nothing.
Hunter: Its still around! I shot a thylacine and took some photos!
Scientists: Can we see those photos?
Hunter: ....No.
Right let us see the photos. Defo a stripped stray dog or something lol
@@xxitactical_8723striped*
Because-
🤠🦘 "Hey ya bastard bogan! You just shot an extinct animal cobber! "
Plus THE rule in hunting is to identify your target. He clearly proved he didn't. So, IF true, perhaps he wants the 'glory' without the legal/cultural implications?
If anyone accidentally shoots a thylacine. They have to hide it and keep quiet as it's $1000 fine for having a knife in a vehicle. Shooting one would be at least 20 yrs jail minimum. Nobody is that silly.
@@rickh3714 Nope... It would be perfectly valid to say "I identified it as a brindled feral dog", since the thylacine is officially extinct. Just in the same way you wouldn't have to confirm that the roo you have in the cross-hairs isn't a long-gone Miocene species...
3 words, papua. new. guinea.
Two words: Irian Jaya...haha. Already been there to check things out...not an ez assignment, trust me.
Ha Ha, yeah right - two words (actually one, hyphenated): Mokélé-mbembé
3 words: Why is Gamora?
@@yamahakid450fnice reference
4 words: West Papua New Guinea
Oh man if they have pictures why not release them?
I think there scared if they release the photos people will come and hunt them (Tasmanian tiger)down to either kill them,tranquilize them to do science stuff on them or put them inna zoo so it maybe a good thing they didn't put out the photos
Check the pinned comment
I've commented this on multiple other thylacine videos so I'll share it again. My farther in law has told me this story that back in the early/mid 2000s a couple of hunters accidentally shot one. They then took it back to the tunnack pub and it was put into the deep freezer. He seen it the night it was shot. Now he's unsure of what happened to it after that but he had been told that the university of Tas came and took it and also paid the hunters and owner of the pub to keep quiet about the incident. I personally do believe they are still out there and think there is evidence that proves it but it has not been released to the public for the same reason as why the story I was told was never mentioned because idiots with half a brain would go out track one and kill one just to make a name for themselves.
I appreciate your input. Was that is the Fingal area? I had heard rumors. By the way, I've interviewed locals near Fingal who had an extremely strong sighting but it was around 1979.
@@davida.4933 No mate it was shot out Bothwell way and taken back to tunnack near Oatlands. I'm from st Mary's myself and heard stories of sightings around that area in the 60s and 70s.
@@joshwilliams7360 Thanks for your reply. I did a video tape interview of couple from St. Mary's area whose 1979 sighting I mentioned above. They watched two thylacines in the short grass just off the road to Fingal for several minutes at less than 20 yds. Very strong sighting esp. because of the the length of time, close distance, not running but slowly walking about, stripes and other key identifiers; plus they were not seeking publicity. I presently am sponsoring a significant effort in Tasmania, but I'm certainly not the only one working on this in Tasmania. Neil Water's is also a making a significant effort and despite the huge levels of criticisms, I respect his efforts. I'm based at the George Town airfield. Neil is based at Mt. Cameron. Andrew Orchard also continues to work in the NE. And there are others with a few cameras; perhaps others making serious efforts. I also have strong sighting interviews in SE central Tassie near the highlands. IMO, thylacines may still hold on precariously on the east side, but I retain my own doubts primarily because the devil facial disease study which employed MANY cameras never resulted in any thylacine pics...Despite my involvement, I remain somewhat neutral, but leaning towards continued survival somewhere...
Just to add, I also spoke to a farmer from St. Mary's who cast doubts on continued survival on the east side, as he had never seen a thylacine in 25 yrs. of night shooting (game control)...but then told me his wife believes they still hold on because she saw one near their farm house about 20 years ago...I didn't record the interview so my dates might be off a bit.
you do realise if there still out there and I did say if..if some moron tried to make a name for himself and kill a tyhacine it's a criminal offence sentence to 10 to 15 years in prison
not to mention he will be someone bitch in there.
no the real reason is their extinct, prove me wrong theres a 2 million dollar reward rif you can capture one alive
I hunt and the first rule that every hunter knows is not to shoot if you're not sure what it is, so that person shouldn't have a gun or the shot was intentional
It would be perfectly valid to state you confirmed the identity as a brindled feral-dog, since TC is an extinct species...
@@Me-by2dj Whether it was extinct or not, he shot something he didn't fully identify, he shouldn't have a gun.
Four people I know including me seen one tasmanian tiger 25 years ago in the Colquhoun Regional Park in Victoria 100 metres away and it stopped in its tracks for 30 seconds looked at us and run away we were in shock seen it .1995 no sh*t 👀. One of the people who seen the Tasmanian tiger out of the four people was a farmer he was a four generation farmer .
You say thay they took photos but you don't have them? Why bring it up when you don't have anything in the way of evidence?
I wonder if there's just a small remnant population hanging on --let's say no more than 30 animals. If that's the case, and they're also nocturnal, they could go a long time without being "discovered".
If you had a photo of a tiger why why would you not show it?????
Check the pinned comment
I`m just surprised that anything needs to be hunted in Tasmania - what`s wrong with people ?
Not everyone wants to be 100% dependent on the supermarket. Rural Tasmanians often have their own garden and supplement that with wild game not to mention hunting fish, lobster, etc. Hunting is a big subject and I certainly don't agree with all types of hunting, but the one thing it has going for it is the fact that's it's the virtual opposite of agriculture which arguably was the basic reason thylacine numbers were decimated not to mention all of the other numerous negatives to wildlife and crucial ecosystems.
@@davida.4933 Fair comment. My point about hunting was aimed towards those who do it for the fun or sake of it. Wildlife needs supporting at every opportunity !
@@veronikaquick6738 Not long ago, some one remarked, you claim to be a biologist and wildlife photographer yet you hunt/fish, how can that be? Good grief, the level of misunderstanding is mind boggling...anyway, my personal opinion is only a very small percent of wildlife species (incl. certain gamefish) should be hunted. But again, the real culprit almost no one focuses on is agriculture, esp. commercial agriculture. Still, here we are almost universally outside the circle of Nature, essentially entirely dependent upon stores (for our food) and the very thing that is killing the world's wildlife and ecostystems...agriculture.
@@davida.4933 Unfortunately, across the world, too many creatures are hunted for the most ridiculous of reasons, the worst probably being for supposed medicinal properties, trophy hunters and entertainment - the list goes on.
Commercial agriculture is also a major issue granted as is commercial trawling.
Somehow, the world needs to replenish / give back, instead of eating itself.
As a supposed intelligent people ( which is becoming more and more arguable ) we should be Guardians of everything on this planet - not its destructors.
There are people and companies doing brilliant work out there but there`s plenty of room for more.
@@veronikaquick6738 I agree with several of your points, but it's a mistake to paint hunting and hunters with a broad stroke. I will address your point regarding fun/entertainment. Of course I don't agree with, for example all types of such hunting. On the other hand, hunting and by extension fishing (which is also hunting) can be "fun". It's a paleolithic vacation of sorts and puts man back in the circle of Nature as opposed to be outside that circle as most people find themselves today. Even picking and eating wild berries can be fun compared to just paying for blackberries or whatever at your local market. Regarding the thylacine, it wasn't Aboriginal hunters or even Tasmanian hunters which brought the species to the point of extinction. It was primarily agriculturalists because they were the impetus for the bounties. Agriculture started the world wide population growth beginning roughly 12,000 ybp primarily via three crops: wheat, corn, and rice. On the positive side, we have the world today with all it's benefits. On the negative side we are causing the 6th mass extinction epoch because of population growth and all the life killing aspects commercial agriculture entails. By the way, yes I'm a biologist, working in Tasmania and Borneo. In Tassie I'm actively hunting Mr. Stripey (with cameras)...I'm not interested in a reward, I'm interested in conservation biology.
This is so interesting. I want to know more and I think we got the right man on the job. I'm starting to believe Cookie is a "can do" kind of guy when he takes on a question such as this. I love his passion on the subject of the Thylacine's exsistance and on top of all this I think he is a very smart guy looking at all angles and asking the right questions and has just the right amount of skepticism to get to the truth. Keep up the fine work Cook!
I hope its still out there it took decade upon decade of dedicated looking to find the night parrot so its possible and the night parrot had just 2 sightings the tasi tiger has loads of sightings.Fingers crossed 🤞
There's the rub, eh? The small, elusive bird like night parrot would be far, far more difficult to track down and photograph than a large, top-tier predator, yet they found it, with far fewer people and effort that's been directed at 'rediscovering' the thylacine...
Anyone really can say they took pics but yet we see none, hhmmm
Yeah he should've shown the ones that are publicly known, although the link in the pinned comment shows them
I took some photos but you cant see them 🤔
Check the pinned comment
Before l would even consider the foot photo as evidence of the Adamfield event, l would have to know whether that photo was of a dead thylacine not just a photo of one of the living thylacines reclining in its cage, kept at the zoo. Secondly, if it is a thylacine foot (looks like it), how can we verify the photo is a photo of the Adamfield thylacine that was shot? There are also plenty of photographs around of dead thylacines which could be copied and skins of thylacines in the museums as well as taxidermied examples.
Love it! It's not easy to find this information as government cover it up. You can't report a sighting to a shire or council cause they don't care biosecurity same! Can only report to your idol at Tagoa, ambiguous or where lite meets dark. Before them u couldn't really report to anyone.
Oh dear, the tinfoil-hat brigade always wheel this one out... Why would there be any conspiracy, it makes zero sense.
If they had a corpse why not take samples rather than just photos? This is BS!
What's interesting is that if they declared that the thylacine wasn't extinct at that time it would have meant any mining operations would have to stop. Probably why the Australian government who are known for their greed suppressed this
So still no evidence then 🤔
What do you define as evidence
@Chris Gaming anything credible no more of this clickbait bullshit
@@poolie-mag8282 That's an incredibly vague definition
About as vague as the headlines and clickbait titles
Lots of hearsay but no evidence . A modern-recent photo of one would be worth a small fortune to the owner ,where are that guys copies who else has seen them , even one would do . The guys that were supposed to have shot one and taken photos could easily pass one to a friend who " just found it " and collect the payout for them to share . At one stage there was a $100 k reward for any recent photo after 1936 and yet nothing turned up . There are lots of stuffed ones all around the world , nothing is stopping someone taking a photo of a foot from one of them then using that for comparison . All those stories are no more legit than all the others because there is no solid evidence .
Alrightttt!! Lets get this new thylacine video!!!
Before this No Evidence Only hunters tails I thought Wildlife with cookie was on facts Not fantasy
Please learn some proper spelling and grammar.
PNG 2025. Saving up for trail cameras right now.
Very difficult situation, trust me. Better odds in mainlaind AU, in my opinion.
I definitely think there is a chance that there are still a few surviving.
I really admire your work but in my humble opinion this doesn't mark as a evidence at all. Yep, modern biology might went wrong saying thylacine went bye bye forever in the 30s or 40s or 50s ( a lot of search parties with 0 results ) for sure. I would put my money he was still alive in the 70s and the 80s. It would be really brave and crazy ( God I wish for ! ) to say that animal still was around in the 90s ! It's 2023. and technology ( hi-res cams, all types of drones, a lot of field researches with good ground and air vehicles, mobile phones that have both cameras and software as a small Tv station, professional labs that fit in your suitcase, more than a dozen serious bounty offers that could make you rich and famous for eternity ) and the way of life and research is 8x faster and better than it was in the 60s, for example. And still, for years and years now - nothing.
If I would guess, we all should thanks to few greedy men in the 60s and 70s for final extinction of Tasmanian Tiger. Bastards shot a dozen of those, in 4 incidents, and put a final blow. From there and in next 10 years, or so, only a dozen were left to roam across the wild. With no chance for healthy reproduction.
Good sightings post 90's...both mainland AU and Tassie. The level of field work has just intensified in recent years, but I believe we will need at least another decade before we will have a good idea about thylacine status in Australia.
You seem to operate in a vacuum when it comes to the Thylacine topic. Did you know that two of the most prominent thylacine researchers are based in England? It might be worth creating a working relationship 👍
Who are these people? I’ve reached out to almost everyone regarding Thylacines and those willing to talk about it appear on the channel, others say no or simply don’t respond to requests
@@WildlifeWithCookie He might be referring to some of the scientists involved in the CFZ's Tasmania expeditions, such as Richard Freeman. He could be referring to someone else though.
@@WildlifeWithCookie If you go to the scientific literature in recent years, one of the frequent authors is English. How much the "scientists" really know about the current status is debatable, but I will agree they have contributed to historical knowledge and some of the research in that regard is quite good.
Doesn’t really change anything for me, still no good evidence, just some possibly credible accounts. Even if you’d shot one by accident, the remains would have value and probably made the hunters turn them in?
I would imagine the last human interaction with thylacines were unlikely to be the last of the species, just statistically speaking, and there are extremely credible sitings later on, but whether there were individuals in the 80s, 90s, 00s or even today, it seems unlikely they’re anything other than dead clade walking as the population probably has the gene pool with the depth of a muddy puddle. I hope I’m wrong, I truly do.
Getting a bit tin foil hat here, but the Aussie government keeping quiet could be as much that they recognise there’s little hope and it’s not in their interest to keep out companies exploiting Tasmania’s natural resources. If the thylacine was proven to persist, they’d have to act to preserve it, face international scrutiny and still may have little chance of saving the poor things. Possibly. Maybe. I dunno.
The most credible accounts on recent times are PNG for a stable population, but although there’s talk of photos, where are they?
Best chance of seeing one on Tasmania is still the likes of your old mate Neil and his trail cams, which should a decent photo turn up, would speak for itself without any spin or interpretation, and a bit of scientific rigour…
Low levels of genetic homozygosity are not necessarily a fatal circumstance for species...cheetahs and California elephant seals are just two examples. As well, it's likely Tasmanian thylacines had low levels of homozygosity even before Tasmania was settled.
@@davida.4933 But there were several other factors that indicated the species was almost at the end of a genetic dead-end...
There's no photos! How do we know this? Photos would be worth a huge amount of money. Enuff said.
Are you interested in the Great White shark? Go looking off Britain's coast. I'd love to see you do that
So, how do you explain the photos in the pinned comment?
Adamsfield - A Town Called Bastard.
Screeeeew you no pictures.
Really guys. You're going to just talk about how convincing these photos are. Why not show us so that we can judge for ourselves.
Get a couple of hounds on the trail, just baying hounds, they will track them if they are still there, the bloodhound has the best nose
What are you going to use for a scent if they're all dead?... you'll just hope he picks out the right scent out of billions of other scents? Cause a stuffed Thylacine won't work after one's been taxidermied.. Old hides won't work for the same reason due to what they go through to cure and preserve them to prevent the hides from shrinking and their hair from falling out..If done wrong, you'll have to restretch the hide overtime, aswell as having the hair fall out if its hair wasn't set correctly, locking the hair in place...Those chemicals and things used in taxidermy and curing hides will strip the original scent, hell, so will time on its own... bones in a museum won't work to use as a scent either due to their age, as well as the preservation process to prevent the bone from one day disintegrating because of their age.... So, if you used anything like that, which are the only things left that exists as far as we're aware, your dog will lead you to another museum lmao.
Plus, after 100 years, bones left undiscovered will have dissolved into nothing... leaving behind a void in the ground in the shape of the bone that once laid there. if left undisturbed in the correct conditions for a very very long time, the void could be filled in with certain types of minerals being leached in and forming in the exact shape of the bone that left that void....which would be called, a fossil.
So, yeah, unless you have something fresh for them to smell, and you're 100% sure it's/came from a thylacine, they either won't know what to track at all, or they'll track the wrong thing entirely because what you gave them to smell wasn't thylacine....
How do you think tracking works? Do you think you just give the dog a name or show them a picture of the animal like it's a mob hit, then off they go, tracking an animal they've never smelled before? No, you have to give them a scent...if it's a person you're tracking, you let the dog smell the persons clothing or something, then they try picking up the trail and following it. How is a dog supposed to pick up a scent trail with no reference for it to go on? Lmao.
Sometimes we need to take a minute and think a little bit before we post....
Did you hear about DNA evidence of a big cat in the UK?
No were ?
I seen it in the news. No doubt about it at all.
I did, I personally don’t buy in to it
It was reported as "a 99% match".
This could equally have been reported as "does not match".
Those canny newspapers eh?
@@WildlifeWithCookie it’s worth though discussing because it is in fact a Animal Anomaly
Where can we listen to the whole podcast?!
that looks like the Thylacine
I was speaking to someone from Thailand recently who told me they've seen these where he lives!
There ya go - people are convinced they see things that simply aren't what they claim it to be. You cannot trust ANY supposed 'eye-witness' account - full-stop...
@@TasHikingAdventures because someone on the internet told me they've seen these. Your saying I'm on d*ugs?
I think you should reconsider what you think a sense of humor is. I was merely sharing something I was told. I never said I'd seen them personally. I have never been to Thailand so as farfetched as it sounds I couldn't say. But I do doubt it myself too.
For the record you can't have a decent full English breakfast without mushrooms so I shall continue to eat them :)
@@casual_bill8749 well atleast put lol or a 😂 then we would understand.....don't get butt hurt it's all good have a nice day😜
@@TasHikingAdventures No... Because I prefer to consider things respectfully. I'm not butt hurt I have more important things in life to worry about in life than some immature bafoon on the internet. Don't tell people they should type a certain way or react the same way you do and you won't have an issue.
@@casual_bill8749 atleast I don't upload videos to CZcams about toys as a mid 30 so called man...whatever cupcake I'm not here for a keyboard war ya Muppet goodbye
Good one Cookie, from Oz 🇦🇺👍🦘
Ill save u guys time...the photos are only of the padding on the paws/feet...no body of the animal
I wish that you guys would make a drive to the less traveled area's where YOU BELIEVE theres some Thylacines...
AND PUT UP SEVERAL GOOD QUALITY TRAIL CAMERAS.... *PLEASE*!!
THANK YOU MATES!!!
This channel has gone from debunking big cat videos to conspiracy theories based on 'eye witness' accounts of Thylacine and click bait video titles.
This channel is run by a twit, for twits...🐦🐦🐦
Love the vid
Where did you get the thumbnail from?
Yeah why does that actually look so real
@@billiam6071 I assume it’s photoshopped, but the story about Thylacine photos from the 90s paired with this almost indirectly communicates that this may be one of those photos
Guess just the Search for this Animal makes it interesting.If it should be found the Interest about it will dissapear soon.
Well, where is this photo then? C'mon then , let's see this photographic proof ? Is it just me or have we heard of all this rubbish before? I want to see 100% evidence not just stories?
It should !! But cloning is too lucrative perhaps!
3 more words ,,leave it alone,,
Actually the best chance for conservation is proof of existence. It would for starters, be a limitation for forestry practices many of which are toxic.
We've got wild wallabies around wisbech area in fenland too...
Feral...
I saw an excerpt of a video where Forest Galante was claiming that Nick Mooney had told him that he (Nick) had seen one. There were no other details and I have not seen any reference anywhere else to this claimed sighting. Maybe you can interview Nick Mooney about Forest's claim and get further detail. Forest said he thought it was about 25 years ago.
This makes both credible Biologists seem like lying discredited fools! No matter which way you look it. MAJOR FUCKUP YOU 2!
Show me a finer example of professionals promoting to discredit themselves personally not to mention doing to other professionals.
Yes, very interesting claim...Cookie could perhaps sort this out with a telephone interview...hot topic for sure.
Forrest was confused with Col Bailey, a self declared tiger expert who said he saw one in 1995 in Tasmania, only mentioning it more than a decade later when he was releasing his own book...
Nick Mooney saying he saw one on the other hand would if course be highly significant
I get off the internet for one month and now this, what the heck? I still gotta watch it, but that title sounds promising :D
Very interesting I just gotta search for it on my own, I wont accept its extinction until I searched myself at least one time, I mean finding something is unlikely, but I think I couldnt live with myself if I didnt search at least once.
SAME. i’d love to go to tasmania and look for it
While you're at it, can you show me a genuine live Loch Ness Monster? 🦕🗻 😁
Can’t believe there are big cats in England
My auntie has one - it's a big Maine coon and answers to "Tiddles"...
Is there anyone doing something to find thylacines in Papua? it doesn´t seem so, when someone finally decides to go there maybe it will be to late due to a disease or they have been killed.
anywhere off the beaten track in Papua is extremely dangerous to explore.
Nice one cookie 🍪
They just won’t stop shooting the poor thing. What chance does it have?
Arguably only a few were shot if any after the official extinction date. The big problem is habitat destruction (largely because of AGRICULTURE) and toxic forestry practices as well as the rather extensive use of 1080 poison.
@@davida.4933 I think you make an important point. For anyone like myself who doesn't live in Tas/Aus we probably don't understand how aggressive the land management/exploitation has been. Certainly not 1080 poison. -I've never heard of it or of how it's used.
@@davidp4456 Thanks for your objectivity! 1080 is still in widespread use in Tasmania and mainland Australia. Just do a youtube search for 1080 poison. In Tasmania it was widely used in an effort to kill foxes via baits being laced with it (by the thousands despite questionable evidence of foxes). Wow many remaining thylacines might have been poisoned?1080 is also widely used in New Zealand and a very contentious practice. Tasmania forestry also uses many toxic chemcials that are typically bomb dropped from helicopters and of course while wood is necessary the impact on Tasmania's ecoystem's is likely very harmful to many species...
Did you hear about the video the researchers took of the Ivory Billed Woodpecker recently? Seems interesting to me. Although the bird in the video is hard to tell since the video was took from a distance and is very grainy
type in
bree white Thylacine in my yard
These photos are tbh rubbish, & why Is this so so hard to understand, its a bit cloak & Daggers , thanks for ur imput Cookie!
That was cheering to hear. Hope the sighting was legitimate.
Very intriguing. Thank you for this video 😊
I think you are grasping for straws...
Not really, no
More and more seems to indicate that they are indeed out there.
Less & Less you mean? The sightings come and go in phases, usually driven by media reports. Once one clown makes a claim, suddenly a dozen others pop-up out of nowhere...
Cambia todo Senor!
Give it up and stop promoting false hope , tourist dollars come on people.
Watch ‘Thylacine footage, NE Tasmania 2023.’ 2:30-5:12
Bloody hell cookie your starting to sound like Neil lol ,you never know mate an expedition with neil waters and forrest gallante could be in the near future.
You'll find it one day can see the headlines now cookie discovers ozzy tigers alive an well haha
I've seen a couple of the photo's and I know who the researcher was
sure mate and I have bigfoot in my backyard mowing my lawn
Actually there was 2 researchers involved as well as a mainland journo that has seen all the 10 polaroids taken of the dead thylacine and a mainlsnd researcher also had some copies. I presume the researcher you are referring to is no longer among us ?
Bullshit. need solid evidence ,not bullshit talk.
Waffle
Big cats uk
I need subtitles to understand this pillock.
My father-in-law's brother's sister's husband knows a guy who has a picture of a foot of a supposably extinct animal, it must be true😅
It's probably because they're not true😂 you just want them to be 😢 it's sad that they were wiped out but they are gone.
Asserting that they're extinct won't make them extinct
@@chrisgaming9567 But facts and evidence speaks for themselves. They've gone, get over it...
@@Me-by2dj Asserting that facts and evidence are on your side doesn't make that true either.
"congratulations everyone, we've done it." 🫡