The Early Church & Pre-Tribulation Rapture? | Dr. Michael Vlach and Jon Benzinger | End Times Q&A

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 09. 2024

Komentáře • 5

  • @jaymelawson9080
    @jaymelawson9080 Před rokem

    I've been digging and studying this, and I'd the conclusion i came to, so when I saw this video I immediately clicked on it, and its helped me tremendously. Thank you.

    • @SpotterVideo
      @SpotterVideo Před 8 měsíci

      What does an understanding of the New Covenant do to the Pretrib Rapture doctrine?
      Since the New Covenant is “everlasting” in Hebrews 13:20, how is the New Covenant Church age going to end seven years before the Second Coming of Christ? Why would anyone think God is going back to the Old Covenant system now made “obsolete” by the New Covenant in Hebrews 8:13? We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24.
      Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
      The Capitol "C" Church, as we use the word today, is not found in the entire Book of Revelation. Individual church bodies in ancient Asia Minor are found. In Revelation 12:11 we find those under the blood of the Lamb. A person cannot be under the blood of the Lamb and not be a part of the New Covenant Church of Jesus Christ. Verse 12 of this passage proves at least part of the tribulation period is the wrath of Satan upon the people of God.
      Rev 12:11 And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death.
      Rev 12:12 Therefore rejoice, ye heavens, and ye that dwell in them. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.
      "It may come as a surprise to most pre-Trib prophecy students that the post-Trib position (in its primitive form) is the oldest point of view."
      (The quotation above is from the book "Will You Escape The Tribulation? RAPTURE [Under Attack]", by Tim LaHaye, copyright 1998, Page 197.) Tim LaHaye was co-author of the “Left Behind” books and movies which have convinced millions of modern Christians that the Church age ends seven years before the Second Coming of Christ. Recently, Pastor Matt Furse of Mountain View Baptist Church in Custer, S.D. has written a book titled “Which One Is Right?’, which reveals the recent history of the pretrib rapture doctrine, and the fact it does not agree with what is written in the King James Bible.
      The gathering of the Church is described at the end of 1 Thess. Chapter 4, and the timing of the event is found in chapter 5. The word “But” in the first verse of chapter 5 connects the two chapters, and the words “we” and “sleep” in verse 10 of chapter 5 prove the two chapters are connected.
      The Greek words for “wrath” and “tribulation” are not the same word, as proven by the verse below.
      Rev 1:9 I John, who also am your brother, and companion in tribulation, and in the kingdom and patience of Jesus Christ, was in the isle that is called Patmos, for the word of God, and for the testimony of Jesus Christ.
      Watch the CZcams video “Pretribulation Paradox” by former pretrib believer skydiver626.

    • @a-sheepof-christ9027
      @a-sheepof-christ9027 Před 5 měsíci

      @@SpotterVideo Nothing you mentioned proves a paradox. Hebrews 13:20 says the new covenant is everlasting. So too is the Priesthood of Aaron in the OT;
      yet Christ brought a "better sacrifice" and "new testament" while being entered into a "superior priesthood". One does not exclude the other. 1st point refuted.
      Ontop of that mostl native Hebrew speakers can affirm that according to Daniel 9 the only way to read it is midtrib; since "Christ is cut off" in verse 26 by a sacrifice that is commited in the MIDDLE OF THE WEEK in verse 27.
      You have to be blind or a dullard to not see this. the hebrews states: Yi'kareth maschiach we'en low.
      Nothing you wrote will change anyones opinion but instead prove us right. Accoding to Daniel 9:26-27 the rapture is midweek; but the eschatology remains the same as in pretrib: Church goes up to Christ who is by then "cut off"; and the Antichrist is then allowed to rise (2 thessalonains 2.3-4).
      You need to learn scripture.