Canon RF 100-400 vs Canon RF 100-500, Compared

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
  • I have owned the Canon RF 100-500 F/4.5-7.1L lens for two years, and I absolutely love it. So, why did I buy the RF 100-400 F/5.6-8? It's shorter, slower, and not an L-class lens. What's it good for? Will it stay in my bag? I took both lenses out for a little bird photography to compare them. Watch and see the results!
    Be sure to check my equipment list and affiliate links. If you log onto Amazon using my links and make a qualifying purchase, I get a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thanks for your support!
    My kit:
    Canon R5: amzn.to/3EAZWRy
    Canon R6: amzn.to/3xQPa5H
    Canon RF 16mm F/2.8: amzn.to/3xQPa5H
    Canon RF 14-35 F/4L: amzn.to/3Sr61p8
    Canon RF 24-105mm F/4L: amzn.to/3SpqURP
    Canon RF 35mm F/1.8: amzn.to/3m81RX9
    Canon RF 100mm F/2.8L Macro: amzn.to/3knTpmc
    Canon RF 100-500mm F/4.5-7.1L: amzn.to/3Z10h8j
    FLM CP30-L4 II tripod
    RRS BH-40 ball head: amzn.to/3YVk88K
    Induro CLT203 tripod: amzn.to/3IRAQAl
    Manfrotto XPRO ball head
    NiSi V5 filter holder & circular polarizer
    NiSi 100mm 3-stop, 6-stop, and 10-stop ND filters
    Lee 100mm 15-stop ND filter
    Lee 100mm x 150mm 3-stop medium grad ND filter
    GoPro Hero12: amzn.to/3XXpHlW
    GoPro Media Mod
    Ulanzi MT71 Vlog Handle: amzn.to/45v7M9G
    Rode VideoMicro shotgun mic: amzn.to/3lSL6PF
    Rode Wireless Go II mic & receiver: amzn.to/3IwWnN8
    Rode Lavalier Go mic: amzn.to/3YXDdaw
    Editing software:
    DaVinci Resolve Studio 18 (www.blackmagic... hicts/davinciresolve/)
    Camtasia: www.techsmith....
    Music:
    Epidemic Sound (www.epidemicso...​); CZcams Studio
    Vegetable Police (vegetablepolic...)
    Other Social Media:
    Instagram: / johndrummondphoto
    X: X.com/PhotoDru...
    Flickr: www.flickr.com...
    Website: jdrummondphoto...

Komentáře • 22

  • @ddki9094
    @ddki9094 Před 4 měsíci +4

    For the flowery image, I really liked the shot with the split between the flowers in the foreground and the reflection in the midground.

  • @zephalu
    @zephalu Před 4 měsíci +1

    Great comparison video. Even though the birds were not agreeable, you got some amazing landscape shots. We thought the doves were too close to call on sharpness.

    • @JohnDrummondPhoto
      @JohnDrummondPhoto  Před 4 měsíci +1

      Thanks for watching! Yeah, it's pretty close between them in sharpness. Pixel peeping is overrated.

  • @chosenbydesign9007
    @chosenbydesign9007 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Yes!! gear head in me is loving this subject. thank you.

  • @stefanusrheeder4162
    @stefanusrheeder4162 Před 4 měsíci +1

    thanks John. Just shows.....you can enjoy the cheaper lenses just as much as the expensive ones. \I prefered the f16 flower tree water landscape pics

  • @withvinayak
    @withvinayak Před 2 měsíci

    I think the landscape photos are just amazing given that you did not use tripod or anything but they came out really well! Kudos 🎉

  • @davidch8618
    @davidch8618 Před 6 dny

    Hi, great video. I was thinking it would be more worth it. I have a Canon R10 and I want a telephoto lens for animals.
    I automatically thought of the RF 100-400mm. Native and with high focusing speed in addition to the low price (in my case 600 euros).
    On the other hand, there is the option of the sigma 150-600 contemporary, with a higher price (800 euros) + adapter (70-100 euros). What do you think is more worth it, losing those important mm in bird photography or the focusing speed in addition to perhaps other problems you have for not being Native?

  • @jameskurzynski2386
    @jameskurzynski2386 Před měsícem

    Great job John! You've inspired me to switch to Canon... Which is where I started by journey. trading for an R8.

    • @JohnDrummondPhoto
      @JohnDrummondPhoto  Před měsícem +1

      @@jameskurzynski2386 that's a great camera, especially for the money.

  • @capturingnaturewithsandip
    @capturingnaturewithsandip Před 4 měsíci +1

    Nice video. Thanks for sharing & big like

  • @randallbrander8157
    @randallbrander8157 Před 3 měsíci +1

    At my age when I bend down and lean forward I usally throw my back out if I stay in this position for awhile. Cheers!

  • @mobelue
    @mobelue Před 4 měsíci +1

    Nice video John. Where were you?

    • @JohnDrummondPhoto
      @JohnDrummondPhoto  Před 4 měsíci +1

      Alley Pond Park & Alley Pond Environmental Center, both in Queens.

  • @freddieslaughter1107
    @freddieslaughter1107 Před 4 měsíci +1

    What is the price difference? Which Canon camera do you use?

    • @JohnDrummondPhoto
      @JohnDrummondPhoto  Před 4 měsíci +2

      The 100-400 is $649. The 100-500 is $2699 (current discount at B&H). I use both the R5 and R6. The 100-500 is a little sharper, a 1/2 stop faster, obviously longer, and it's better weather sealed. But it's hard to justify that price.

    • @David_Quinn_Photography
      @David_Quinn_Photography Před 4 měsíci +2

      ​@@JohnDrummondPhoto wow $700 for the 100-400 that almost nullifies the justification for the 100-500

    • @JohnDrummondPhoto
      @JohnDrummondPhoto  Před 4 měsíci +1

      @@David_Quinn_Photography Yes. I love the image sharpness of the 100-500. But if the 100-400 were available two years ago, I might have bought it. Except it's slow, and slower still with the extender you need to shoot birds with. It'd be a hard decision.

    • @fotoinstruct6971
      @fotoinstruct6971 Před 4 měsíci +4

      @@JohnDrummondPhoto The RF100-400 has become my go to lens for everything since it arrived. Unless I plan on making serious prints, or shooting in heavy rain, my "L's" will be staying home from now on. I've been waiting for over 4 months for B&H to ship my RF200-800 and now wonder if I actually need it. Note- Since the RF200-800 introduction there are real deals now for 100-500's used.