LONDON (Reuters) - Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.
This is actually quite possible. I'm not saying ether it's true or not, just that it is possible. Egypt was conquered by the Greeks in 300b.c. and then the Romans in like 30b.c. so there was likely alot of interracial relationships, maybe even more then in modern times as race/color wasn't as big an issue in the ancient world, especially in the Mediterranean as it connected the bulk of the ancient world
Of course I do. I imagine people always had blue eyes. This video has nothing to do with blue eyes per se. It offers an explanation of why ancient Egyptian tomb sculptures were symbolically given blue eyes when in life the dead person being depicted probably had brown eyes (based on other portraits). You should re-watch the video to pick up more of what I am presenting.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
They could, but it would not matter. The point of the video is to offer an explanation as to why ancient Egyptian tomb portraits (primarily during the Old Kingdom) frequently depicted the deceased with blue eyes when other portraits (e.g. Rahotep) show them with brown eyes. I postulate that because all people's eyes turn blue at death (they really do) that the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the person had moved on into the Afterlife. Thus, blue eyes were used SYMBOLICALLY to represent divinity (for example, the Eye of Horus), and well as Life After Death. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
It really is. I hesitated to put my original research "out there" because I knew some would disagree - and they did. But discussing ideas is always for the best. I am so glad you found this video interesting!
I think there probably was a social class system, but not like the rigid caste system in India. It was more like European feudalism: Nobility and Peasants. But upward (and downward) mobility was definitely possible in ancient Egypt.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
So happy, I have discovered this gem - people are totally out of order, irrational & more obsessed with the KMT/Ancient Egyptian phenotype than with any aspect of this culture
You are correct! The symbolism of the blue eyes is totally lost. THANK YOU for your comment and support, and for watching my programs. I really appreciate it.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
@@susaneuler9462 You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
Not a slippery slope at all. Of course, modern Egyptians have blue eyes, as did ancient Egyptians. This video is about why ancient Egyptian tomb statues had blue eyes when the persons being depicted had brown eyes in life. You might re-watch the video to pick up more of my discussion.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
Yes, many ancient Egyptian portraits do depict people with brown eyes and black kohl eyeliner. Other portraits show them with blue or blue grey rock crystal eyes instead of brown. Ancient Egyptians are also depicted with malachite green eye eyeliner, or lapis lazuli blue eyeliner. So...lots of variety. But the culture lasted for over 3,000 years, so that's to be expected. Thanks for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
Thank you for your comment. This video is not really about DNA or from the many regions the ancient Egyptians really were from. It's about the fact that when people die, their eyes turn a milky blue color. My research shows that this may be the reason why ancient Egyptians sometimes portrayed dead people with blue eyes, even though they may or may not have had blue eyes in life. The blue eyes were used SYMBOLICALLY to indicated that these persons had passed on into the Afterlife, and no longer among the world of the living.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
We will soon be able to find out from dna. They used the Italy project to match the mummies. The original population was Anatolia. Some Neanderthals had the blue grey eyes and red hair. The Mesopotamians also show blue eyes. The blue may have developed in several places at one time.
Thanks for the comment. However, the point of the video was not whether or not ancient Egyptians actually had blue eyes. I expect some did. The point of the video was that when people die their eyes turn a milky blue color. I think that the ancient Egyptians saw this natural occurrence as a sign that the dead person had moved on into the Afterlife. Thus, they gave blue eyes to portrait sculptures placed in tombs to indicate this fact. Later blue eyes were also used for the Eye of Horus for similar symbolic reasons.
The original people are Anatolia!! You literally said everything about us. Stop, because the genetic analyzes of the Egyptians already exist, and those who did them are non-Egyptian scientists. I will not explain to you who we are. Go and search.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
@@agayactornamedmichaeldougl6289 , Northern Europe. Susan mentions in the video that there are people of all races that have blue eyes. While this may be true, it can be misleading to think this happens naturally within each racial population. What actually happens is that the people of all races that have blue eyes have a Northern European ancestor.
Saharan Africans Africans haven’t always lived there Many actually migrated from the east and settled in west Africa . Many migrations and wars pushed them that way.
So true. There have always been mass migrations. The study of human genetic haplogroups shows this. I'm no expert on human genetic migration patterns, so you might want to look it up for yourself. However, the point of my presentation was not to argue about race. What I am saying is that the blue eyes depicted in some ancient Egyptian tomb portraits are not meant to portray that those individuals had blue eyes in life. The blue eyes indicate that the individual being portrayed was now DEAD, and had passed on into the Afterlife. I base my assertion on the medical fact that when people die, their eyes develop a milky film that looks blue or bluish. Thus, I think it is probable that the ancient Egyptians used the blue eye thing as a symbol for the belief that at death, a person's spirit passes from one dimension into another.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
You are wrong ma'am. Blue-eyed people came from ONE common ansestor. Blue-eyed peoples originated from Turkey, some say Italy and if you know anything and the links between both of those countries, you will know why the debate exists. You have to follow genetics, not pictures. All people who die have blue eyes? LOL!!!!!! Ever heard of paint? Or maybe inter-marriage? In order to have blue eyes, both parents must have the mutant gene that is resessive. Back in the day, Egyptians would have to had married someone with the gene, then as time goes on you could get that gene expression in an Egyption. I have Olive skin and blue eyes and none of my ancestors came from the upper regions like Finland, Sweden or Denmark. Mine came from Asia Minor.
If you look up what eyes look like shortly after death you will see that they have turned a milky blue. You can even see photos, if you do not believe me. But that's not the point. Some ancient Egyptians had blue eyes, as I say in the video. What I am discussing is not genetics, but how blue eyes were used SYMBOLICALLY to indicate that a person had passed on into the Afterlife. And the concept of blue eyes linked with eternal life and divinity continued symbolically with the Eye of Horus, and the Turkish nazar. Unfortunately some people argue that because some ancient Egyptians are depicted with blue eyes that means that they must have been Nordic caucasians. They most probably were not, as you yourself point out. You have olive skin and blue eyes and are not Nordic. Please watch the video again. You will see that the point is symbolism, not a discussion of genetics at all. Thanks for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
Yes macidonians were in egypt with alexander, this does not mean were egyptians with ethnicity, because greecs -macidonians were in alexandria as invaders
Egypt was always a very international country with people living there who came from many parts of the Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, and African world. But...the point of the video was to discuss my research that suggests that the reason some Old Kingdom tomb sculptures were portrayed with blue eyes is because they were DEAD. When people die, their eyes turn a milky blue no matter what the original color. I think the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the dead had passed into the Afterlife. Thus, the blue eyes are a way of symbolically showing this.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
So....? The point of the video is not whether people in ancient times had blue eyes. Of course, they did. The point is to offer and explanation of why Old Kingdom Egyptian tomb portraits frequently depict the dead person with blue eyes, when other portraits of that person (e.g. Rahotep) show them having brown eyes. I suggest that because all people's eyes turn a milky blue at death (they really do) that the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the deceased had moved on from this world into the Afterlife. Thus, blue eyes came to be used SYMBOLICALLY to represent religious concepts associated divinity and eternal life. For example, the Eye of Horus is often shown as blue or with blue eye liner. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
@@susaneuler9462 i never thought from that perspective...might be...i was more positive,thinking that people those times,sumerians and other neighboring communities or clans might must have had blue eyes,which was probably rare,and maybe it was portrayed because of that...in turkish,the blue eyed nazar is seen as bringing luck,a shamanistic belief,also blue is the sky father of the göktürks maybe it had a common or similiar belief in ancient egypt...🙏
@@nukhetyavuz Yes! The Nazar is a more modern interpretation of the Eye of Horus. Exactly correct. People have always had blue eyes, even in ancient Egypt, although brown eyes were far more common just as they are today in that country. Personally, I do not think associating blue eyes with Life After Death is a negative idea. Sounds comforting to me because it would be a sign that your loved one was not "gone" but only existing in a different state of being. And you are right about the Sumerians. They also portrayed beings with blue eyes in their religious art and votive statues. All this certainly has to do with the sky, as I explain in the video. Please watch it again, and tell me what new things you learn!! Thanks.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
Ramses II had read hair as did other Egyptian pharaohs. Many mummies found throughout cemeteries also had blond or red hair. The Smithsonian conducted a large-scale DNA test Barry's Egyptian citizens Pharaoh's from the past. They are lighter-skinned than the people residing in today's Egypt. They closely resemble Italian, Greek and other Mediterranean peoples. Mediterranean peoples. Mediterranean peoples. The reason the statues have blue eyes is because the people had blue eyes. Not all of them but anyone that has blue eyes as Caucasian or white ancestry. Caucasian is the race of Europeans, Middle easterners and North Africans. As well as Central Europeans like those from Dagestan, Georgia so on. This is all revisionist, politically correct, woke history. Most professors and so-called experts today are afraid to tell the truth
Those three Egyptian mummies werent so white per se, they were rather somewhat white, but a litlle bit darker, due to the sun and other things. And also I have a question, could you send me an article about Smithsonian? Beacuse I know about the article on nature communications by Johannes Krause that states that ancient Egyptians had less subsaharan DNA, but I havent heard of the article you are talking about. I am very courious and would like to read it :)
Thank you for your comments. However, this video is not about ethnicity. It is about the medical fact that when people die, their eyes turn a milky blue. My research suggests that this is the reason some ancient Egyptian tomb portraits were given blue eyes, even though they may or may not have had blue eyes in life. The blue eyes were to symbolize that the persons being represented were DEAD, and had passed on into the Afterlife. Later, blue eyes became symbolic of the Afterlife and the realm of the gods. No wokeness involved here.
No European males aren’t. Go look at Seti I his father which wore a black wig and is painted Reddish brown like a Hamitic Ethiopians of the eastern desert.
When the gods left that was it anything else is false the people and all the real children of Egypt is marked buy the gods and goddess by hand and feet these are the true Egyptian gods and goddess in fact it's a few of us here right now but have been reincarnated born back into this world with the mark of Egypt and the celestial world soon the world will see and know the truth
The coloured people with blue eyes are mixed people. You see it everytime on the faces. Look in opposite to this photos ancient paintings and statues of black nations like the nubians.
Yes, the people of color with blue eyes are mixed people. The ancient Egyptians were also mixed people. But...the point of the video is that the blue eyed SCULPTURES done primarily in the Old Kingdom were not realistic portraits of how the subject looked in life. I seriously doubt that Rahotep and Nofret had blue eyes in life. But...they are shown as they looked after death when their eyes had turned the milky blueish color that biologically happens to all dead people - Black, White, Asian, Mixed. My theory is that the ancient Egyptians saw this physical change as a sign that the dead person had moved on and entered the Afterlife. So...the blue eyes are being used SYMBOLICALLY, not as an indication of race or living physical appearance. Yes, the ancient Egyptian paintings done of Nubians show them looking like Nubians. However, I contend that if we had an Old Kingdom tomb sculpture of a Nubian person, and that person was depicted with blue eyes, then that was to indicate that the person was dead and had passed into the Afterlife. Really...THANK YOU for your comment. I LOVE a good academic discussion!!! Keep watching my channel.
@@susaneuler9462 I saw many sculptures and busts in the Pergamon-museum in Berlin in 2020. The first dynasties were without doubt pure western people. We find no non-european faces in the first 4-8 dynasties. For this reason Im sure that from the royal familes down to the middle-class were had all people typically blue, grey and green eyes. Rahotep is from the 4th dynasty and Nefertiti lived while the 18. dynasty. This is a big difference. But its possible that she had blue eyes because their facial features which are clearly european. (Afrocentrists are such idiots, unbelievable!). If you look after people with blue eyes in India, Iran and North Africa, you´ll find enough. So, why Nefertiti should not have had blue eyes? Even in the 18th dynasty lived surely rests of the pure founders and as we know Tutanchamum had western DNA. So, sometimes blues eyes were used as a symbol of divine origin. But in the case of Egypt (Kemet), I dont believe this, because nobody from their gods had or has blue eyes. So blue eyes were surely in Egypt no sign of a higher origin.
@@reneguenon7824 Well...you make valid points, and I do not dispute them. It all points to what I did say in the video, quoting the author Elizabeth Peters. The ancient Egyptians were a different group of humans. They did not fit into a category of what we think of today as "Black" or "White." More research clearly has to be done, using DNA or whatever. BUT...although some have argued that blue eyes were used ONLY as a symbol of divine origin, I did not. I think that the blue eyes of specific sculptures (e.g. Rahotep and Nofret) were symbolizing that they had gone on into the Afterlife. Because - and this is true, you can look it up - when people die, their eyes turn a milky blue. And I think that the ancient Egyptians saw this as an important indication that since we change physically when we die, then (maybe) we move into a different state of being. And...centuries later, blue eyes did became associated with the Eye of Horus etc. So divine origin is part of the story, for sure. But it's not the whole story. THANK YOU for continuing this discussion. Always a pleasure.
@@reneguenon7824 Oh, and another thing. I did not discuss Nefertiti in the video. She is a mine field of controversy. She does look Caucasian. And why shouldn't she have been? Egypt was a very cosmopolitan society. But as for her brown eyes...well, I am Caucasian, and I have brown eyes. But I assume that her eyes turned a milky blue when she died, and mine will too. That's biology, not a belief system or a racial thing at all. THANKS AGAIN.
@@susaneuler9462 This is a mistake. Race is very important, but the elites today make us believe that race doesnt exist at all and that race dont matters for culture and the quality and strenght of a society. You should read Kevin B. MacDonalds "Culture of Critique" to learn more about the reasons whats going on today in the sciences and politics. And then you should buy and read Edward Duttons "Making Sense of Race" (of course I own a copy in german language with another title). I can´t explain and discuss here all things. Its a good advice to you, no more. We all grew up brainwashed and we as german are more brainwashed and stupid than anybody other nation in the world, believe me. Anyway, we have all reason to be proud of our race and racial family. The truth is simply, some (not all) of the biggest and most important ancient cultures were founded by indoeuropan and/or caucasian tribes and people. Its also not correct that for instance the vedic culture is a result of the mix between Ariyas (in english: Aryans) and Dravidians. Correct is that they built a cast-system and they used surely dravidians in the first centuries or perhaps over thousands of years (in every case a long long time) for simply servant-works. But the culture and religion as whole was created by indoeuropean people and later corrupted by mixed people with Shudra-minds.This you can see for instance on the fact that Indra in the Bhagavadgita (which I know very good; I started to study Hinduism as I was 19/20 years old and I using also orientalist studies about this subject) changed to Krishna, a kind of black, dravidian Messias or Saviour. The biggest problem today is that we western people own deep complexes and thats why you should read or study MacDonalds work. I read also books about Afrocentrism. This is no game. Some forces trying to destroy our mind, our soul, our race, our history. They steal our culture, our inventions and creations all over the world. The biggest problem is maybe the fact that to much r-selected people with no in-group mentality living amongst us. They are traitor, enemies and worthless for our cultures and societies. If you go deeper in this subject with enough researches (and the material exists, some of this stuff since a long time) you will see the things in the same way if you are not an leftist generally. By he way: Euler is maybe a pseudonym, but a german name. Im sure you know that. Back to the topic: I had doubts against some presentations from authors like Arthur Kemp ("Children of Ra" and "March of the Titans") before I traveled to Berlin and see this old relicts with own eyes. But its true. There is no difference between the look of the original greeks, romans, persians and egyptians. Should be mentioned in passing H.P.Blavatsky wrote the old vedic people and the egyptians came from the same stock. Some years ago I believed firstly she was mad. (But in fact she was no eurocentric, no ethnocentric, no racist and not even a racialist). Brown eyes are no proof for a mixed blood or genes. Some branches of the caucasian race own darker eyes. (We find in Ireland for instance many people with brown eyes, also in Scotland and some parts of Scandinavia. We know also that some Viking-heroes and leader had dark hair and brown eyes.) Race is a compendium. All the best!
@@susaneuler9462 my father is gaelic and my mother is mayan, not mexican mayan, but real mayans from the captivity, who were housed in cape verde for 400 years. 1600s -1900s .my aunties and grandmother were actually relocated from Connecticut bay , they were the remnant of the mystic massacre. I have a very coincidental life to like i was born under that supernova and my right hand is filled with the stones of the seven sisters. When a nord has kids with a yotan…. I went to a gifted and talented school called hancock for 1-6. Can you read stones?
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
@@MAW51187 Annunaki were the first one's who had blue eyes and rare blood types like the RH Null factor or "Golden Blood" and have higher psychic abilities and can use magic to a higher degree due to their blood having a higher content of Arcane elements due to a alchemical transfiguration, starfire, and incantations which also helped them to shapeshift into their God forms, Demon forms and into other God forms for trickery and deciet. Shapeshifting is a commen practice in ancient egypt and throughout history, even Jesus was known to shapeshift and take on different froms and in the Stromata it is said he did not have a normal human body but a Divine one made of light. After the Council of Nicea, they removed the information from declared it heretical and works from the devil (Invented character) modeled after Set the Annunaki god in egypt. Modern religion is degenerate trash that has lost all truths of the REAL mythical christ. Church father Clement of Alexandria wrote the following around the year 200, in which he claimed that Jesus’ body was unlike that of an ordinary person: The text read: “Pilate, then, looked at Jesus and, behold, he became incorporeal: He did not see him for a long time,” - (Stromata 6.9) "After six days Jesus took Peter, James and John with him and led them up a high mountain, where they were all alone. There he was transfigured before them." - (Mark 9:2 ) “There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light. Just then there appeared before them Moses and Elijah, talking with Jesus” ( Matthew 17:2-3 ). Pseudo-Cyril of Jerusalem On the Life and the Passion of Christ: A Coptic Apocryphon says this about Jesus on page (160-161): "Then the Jews said to Judas: ‘How shall we arrest him, for he does not have a single shape but his appearance changes.90 Sometimes he is ruddy, sometimes he is white, sometimes he is red, sometimes he is wheat-coloured, sometimes he is pallid like ascetics, sometimes he is a youth, sometimes an old man, sometimes his hair is straight and black, sometimes it is curled, sometimes he is tall, sometimes he is short. In one word, we have never seen him in one and the same appearance." The Stromata - Clement Of Alexandria - P. 421 states this in regards to Jesus Shapeshifting into a phantasmal form: "The Gnostic is such, that he is subject only to the affections that exist for the maintenance of the body, such as hunger, thirst, and the like. But in the case of the Saviour, it were ludicrous [to suppose] that the body, as a body, demanded the necessary aids in order to its duration. For He ate, not for the sake of the body, which was kept together by a holy energy, but in order that it might not enter into the minds of those who were with Him to entertain a different opinion of Him; in like manner as certainly some afterwards supposed that He appeared in a phantasmal shape (δοκήσει). But He was entirely impassible (ἀπαθής); inaccessible to any movement of feeling-either pleasure or pain. While the apostles, having most gnostically mastered, through the Lord's teaching, anger and fear, and lust, were not liable even to such of the movements of feeling, as seem good, courage, zeal, joy, desire, through a steady condition of mind, not changing a whit; but ever continuing unvarying in a state of training after the resurrection of the Lord." Jesus / Yeshua is probably Annunaki or a different alien race that came to teach humans the Law of One more or less.
I am Egyptian..and your talk about us being a multi-ethnic people is wrong. You can search and you will see that Arabs are only 17 percent of Egyptians and European and Asian genes are very few..and the rest are purebred Egyptians and not as they claim that the ancient Egyptians were black-skinned because this is wrong, and we will not allow them to be taken Our history from us !!
Thank you for your comments. However, this video is not about multi-ethnicity or ethnicity at all. It is about the medical fact that at death, a person's eyes turn a milky blue. My research suggests that the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the dead person had passed on into the Afterlife. Thus, some portrait tomb sculptures were portrayed with blue eyes to indicate that the person was DEAD and no longer among the living. Later, blue eyes became associated with the Afterlife and the Gods. I am not taking away your history. I am arguing that the blue eyes of some portrait sculptures may not be an indication of ethnicity at all, but a symbolic representation of death and religious beliefs.
@@susaneuler9462 im already wached the video.. I think you are talking about colored eyes and colored hair that we did not inherit from our ancestors..but their mummy exists and some of them have yellow and red hair, so you should not argue about something very clear.. so sorry, but this is not true. There is a video on my page about what we looked like and what the ancient Egyptians looked like, and you will see an Egyptian person who looks like an ancient Egyptian in everything, even in eye color
@@asmaasayed192 I am not talking about colored eyes or colored hair. Not at all. Here is my point: when people die their eyes turn a milky blue color no matter what the original color was.The ancient Egyptians may have seen this as a sign that the person had passed into the Afterlife., The blue eyes were SYMBOLIC of the fact that the dead person had passed into another realm of existence. Nothing to do with ethnicity AT ALL.
@@asmaasayed192 It's perfectly all right! I understand. Things are very difficult right now. I really appreciate your support, and I hope you will keep watching my videos.
LONDON (Reuters) - Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.
ha ha ha
🤣🤣 they have the same haplotype R1B if you actually read the study, and R1B is wildly present in Africa as well.
I question this.
Correct.
This is actually quite possible. I'm not saying ether it's true or not, just that it is possible. Egypt was conquered by the Greeks in 300b.c. and then the Romans in like 30b.c. so there was likely alot of interracial relationships, maybe even more then in modern times as race/color wasn't as big an issue in the ancient world, especially in the Mediterranean as it connected the bulk of the ancient world
The eye of Horus is blue
Yes, it is often symbolically represented that way. I believe I cover this subject in the video.
That statue of the seated scribe is fake.
Not a single other statue of a scribe from the Middle Kingdom or New Kingdom looks like that.
Rahotep and Nofret are also fakes.
you do know that blue eyes have been around longer than the pyramids?
Of course I do. I imagine people always had blue eyes. This video has nothing to do with blue eyes per se. It offers an explanation of why ancient Egyptian tomb sculptures were symbolically given blue eyes when in life the dead person being depicted probably had brown eyes (based on other portraits). You should re-watch the video to pick up more of what I am presenting.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
They can do genetic testing on a large number of mummies to determine
They could, but it would not matter. The point of the video is to offer an explanation as to why ancient Egyptian tomb portraits (primarily during the Old Kingdom) frequently depicted the deceased with blue eyes when other portraits (e.g. Rahotep) show them with brown eyes. I postulate that because all people's eyes turn blue at death (they really do) that the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the person had moved on into the Afterlife. Thus, blue eyes were used SYMBOLICALLY to represent divinity (for example, the Eye of Horus), and well as Life After Death. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
@@susaneuler9462you have proof the statues are of dead people? Because no you don't.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
they did, doesn’t look good for the ideas presented here
Great video
Thank you so much. This is my original theory, and enjoyed sharing it!
Great topic!
It really is. I hesitated to put my original research "out there" because I knew some would disagree - and they did. But discussing ideas is always for the best. I am so glad you found this video interesting!
Was there a cast system based off origins or a more preferred type of peoples for different jobs? Like India?
I think there probably was a social class system, but not like the rigid caste system in India. It was more like European feudalism: Nobility and Peasants. But upward (and downward) mobility was definitely possible in ancient Egypt.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
So happy, I have discovered this gem - people are totally out of order, irrational & more obsessed with the KMT/Ancient Egyptian phenotype than with any aspect of this culture
You are correct! The symbolism of the blue eyes is totally lost. THANK YOU for your comment and support, and for watching my programs. I really appreciate it.
Kemet = Egypt lol, meaning black fertile land, and the black color was the symbol of fertility for my ancestors lol, im fed up w afro wallah
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
@@susaneuler9462 You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
Some modern Egyptians have blue eyes
Not a slippery slope at all. Of course, modern Egyptians have blue eyes, as did ancient Egyptians. This video is about why ancient Egyptian tomb statues had blue eyes when the persons being depicted had brown eyes in life. You might re-watch the video to pick up more of my discussion.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
They eyes are brown with a black out line around the outer layer of the eyes
Yes, many ancient Egyptian portraits do depict people with brown eyes and black kohl eyeliner. Other portraits show them with blue or blue grey rock crystal eyes instead of brown. Ancient Egyptians are also depicted with malachite green eye eyeliner, or lapis lazuli blue eyeliner. So...lots of variety. But the culture lasted for over 3,000 years, so that's to be expected. Thanks for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
The druids where priests in Al-Khemet.
No they weren't.
9500 years ago they came frm the Black Sea region as DNA analises show.
King Tut and his relatives did, but not all Egyptians
Thank you for your comment. This video is not really about DNA or from the many regions the ancient Egyptians really were from. It's about the fact that when people die, their eyes turn a milky blue color. My research shows that this may be the reason why ancient Egyptians sometimes portrayed dead people with blue eyes, even though they may or may not have had blue eyes in life. The blue eyes were used SYMBOLICALLY to indicated that these persons had passed on into the Afterlife, and no longer among the world of the living.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
We will soon be able to find out from dna. They used the Italy project to match the mummies. The original population was Anatolia. Some Neanderthals had the blue grey eyes and red hair. The Mesopotamians also show blue eyes. The blue may have developed in several places at one time.
Thanks for the comment. However, the point of the video was not whether or not ancient Egyptians actually had blue eyes. I expect some did. The point of the video was that when people die their eyes turn a milky blue color. I think that the ancient Egyptians saw this natural occurrence as a sign that the dead person had moved on into the Afterlife. Thus, they gave blue eyes to portrait sculptures placed in tombs to indicate this fact. Later blue eyes were also used for the Eye of Horus for similar symbolic reasons.
The original people are Anatolia!! You literally said everything about us. Stop, because the genetic analyzes of the Egyptians already exist, and those who did them are non-Egyptian scientists. I will not explain to you who we are. Go and search.
No, blue eyes had a single origin.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
@@agayactornamedmichaeldougl6289 , Northern Europe.
Susan mentions in the video that there are people of all races that have blue eyes. While this may be true, it can be misleading to think this happens naturally within each racial population. What actually happens is that the people of all races that have blue eyes have a Northern European ancestor.
Saharan Africans Africans haven’t always lived there
Many actually migrated from the east and settled in west Africa . Many migrations and wars pushed them that way.
So true. There have always been mass migrations. The study of human genetic haplogroups shows this. I'm no expert on human genetic migration patterns, so you might want to look it up for yourself. However, the point of my presentation was not to argue about race. What I am saying is that the blue eyes depicted in some ancient Egyptian tomb portraits are not meant to portray that those individuals had blue eyes in life. The blue eyes indicate that the individual being portrayed was now DEAD, and had passed on into the Afterlife. I base my assertion on the medical fact that when people die, their eyes develop a milky film that looks blue or bluish. Thus, I think it is probable that the ancient Egyptians used the blue eye thing as a symbol for the belief that at death, a person's spirit passes from one dimension into another.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
You are wrong ma'am. Blue-eyed people came from ONE common ansestor. Blue-eyed peoples originated from Turkey, some say Italy and if you know anything and the links between both of those countries, you will know why the debate exists. You have to follow genetics, not pictures. All people who die have blue eyes? LOL!!!!!!
Ever heard of paint? Or maybe inter-marriage? In order to have blue eyes, both parents must have the mutant gene that is resessive. Back in the day, Egyptians would have to had married someone with the gene, then as time goes on you could get that gene expression in an Egyption. I have Olive skin and blue eyes and none of my ancestors came from the upper regions like Finland, Sweden or Denmark. Mine came from Asia Minor.
If you look up what eyes look like shortly after death you will see that they have turned a milky blue. You can even see photos, if you do not believe me. But that's not the point. Some ancient Egyptians had blue eyes, as I say in the video. What I am discussing is not genetics, but how blue eyes were used SYMBOLICALLY to indicate that a person had passed on into the Afterlife. And the concept of blue eyes linked with eternal life and divinity continued symbolically with the Eye of Horus, and the Turkish nazar.
Unfortunately some people argue that because some ancient Egyptians are depicted with blue eyes that means that they must have been Nordic caucasians. They most probably were not, as you yourself point out. You have olive skin and blue eyes and are not Nordic. Please watch the video again. You will see that the point is symbolism, not a discussion of genetics at all. Thanks for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
Yes macidonians were in egypt with alexander, this does not mean were egyptians with ethnicity, because greecs -macidonians were in alexandria as invaders
Egypt was always a very international country with people living there who came from many parts of the Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, and African world. But...the point of the video was to discuss my research that suggests that the reason some Old Kingdom tomb sculptures were portrayed with blue eyes is because they were DEAD. When people die, their eyes turn a milky blue no matter what the original color. I think the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the dead had passed into the Afterlife. Thus, the blue eyes are a way of symbolically showing this.
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
johannes krause states that 8000 years ago ancient anatolians went to europe,having brown skin and blue eyes...so?...
So....? The point of the video is not whether people in ancient times had blue eyes. Of course, they did. The point is to offer and explanation of why Old Kingdom Egyptian tomb portraits frequently depict the dead person with blue eyes, when other portraits of that person (e.g. Rahotep) show them having brown eyes. I suggest that because all people's eyes turn a milky blue at death (they really do) that the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the deceased had moved on from this world into the Afterlife. Thus, blue eyes came to be used SYMBOLICALLY to represent religious concepts associated divinity and eternal life. For example, the Eye of Horus is often shown as blue or with blue eye liner. Thank you for your comment. I appreciate hearing from you.
@@susaneuler9462 i never thought from that perspective...might be...i was more positive,thinking that people those times,sumerians and other neighboring communities or clans might must have had blue eyes,which was probably rare,and maybe it was portrayed because of that...in turkish,the blue eyed nazar is seen as bringing luck,a shamanistic belief,also blue is the sky father of the göktürks maybe it had a common or similiar belief in ancient egypt...🙏
@@nukhetyavuz Yes! The Nazar is a more modern interpretation of the Eye of Horus. Exactly correct. People have always had blue eyes, even in ancient Egypt, although brown eyes were far more common just as they are today in that country. Personally, I do not think associating blue eyes with Life After Death is a negative idea. Sounds comforting to me because it would be a sign that your loved one was not "gone" but only existing in a different state of being. And you are right about the Sumerians. They also portrayed beings with blue eyes in their religious art and votive statues. All this certainly has to do with the sky, as I explain in the video. Please watch it again, and tell me what new things you learn!! Thanks.
Supposedly that's thw region red hair comes from as well
I am Black-American mixed with White and North African Sahidic Egyptian-Moroccan. Thank you so much for teaching about Egyptian history!
I love Egyptian history. It's so complex and multi-faceted - always has been. I am so glad you liked my presentation. Thank you!
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
Ramses II had read hair as did other Egyptian pharaohs. Many mummies found throughout cemeteries also had blond or red hair. The Smithsonian conducted a large-scale DNA test Barry's Egyptian citizens Pharaoh's from the past. They are lighter-skinned than the people residing in today's Egypt. They closely resemble Italian, Greek and other Mediterranean peoples. Mediterranean peoples. Mediterranean peoples. The reason the statues have blue eyes is because the people had blue eyes. Not all of them but anyone that has blue eyes as Caucasian or white ancestry. Caucasian is the race of Europeans, Middle easterners and North Africans. As well as Central Europeans like those from Dagestan, Georgia so on. This is all revisionist, politically correct, woke history. Most professors and so-called experts today are afraid to tell the truth
Those three Egyptian mummies werent so white per se, they were rather somewhat white, but a litlle bit darker, due to the sun and other things. And also I have a question, could you send me an article about Smithsonian? Beacuse I know about the article on nature communications by Johannes Krause that states that ancient Egyptians had less subsaharan DNA, but I havent heard of the article you are talking about. I am very courious and would like to read it :)
Thank you for your comments. However, this video is not about ethnicity. It is about the medical fact that when people die, their eyes turn a milky blue. My research suggests that this is the reason some ancient Egyptian tomb portraits were given blue eyes, even though they may or may not have had blue eyes in life. The blue eyes were to symbolize that the persons being represented were DEAD, and had passed on into the Afterlife. Later, blue eyes became symbolic of the Afterlife and the realm of the gods. No wokeness involved here.
@@DominikKowalski-ue3hoyou know that over half of European males are descended from Ramses Ii right?
No European males aren’t. Go look at Seti I his father which wore a black wig and is painted Reddish brown like a Hamitic Ethiopians of the eastern desert.
💙💙💙💙
Thank you so much! I really appreciate your interest and support.
@@susaneuler9462 You are welcome! God Bless you 🇺🇸✝️🙂
When the gods left that was it anything else is false the people and all the real children of Egypt is marked buy the gods and goddess by hand and feet these are the true Egyptian gods and goddess in fact it's a few of us here right now but have been reincarnated born back into this world with the mark of Egypt and the celestial world soon the world will see and know the truth
The coloured people with blue eyes are mixed people. You see it everytime on the faces. Look in opposite to this photos ancient paintings and statues of black nations like the nubians.
Yes, the people of color with blue eyes are mixed people. The ancient Egyptians were also mixed people. But...the point of the video is that the blue eyed SCULPTURES done primarily in the Old Kingdom were not realistic portraits of how the subject looked in life. I seriously doubt that Rahotep and Nofret had blue eyes in life. But...they are shown as they looked after death when their eyes had turned the milky blueish color that biologically happens to all dead people - Black, White, Asian, Mixed. My theory is that the ancient Egyptians saw this physical change as a sign that the dead person had moved on and entered the Afterlife. So...the blue eyes are being used SYMBOLICALLY, not as an indication of race or living physical appearance. Yes, the ancient Egyptian paintings done of Nubians show them looking like Nubians. However, I contend that if we had an Old Kingdom tomb sculpture of a Nubian person, and that person was depicted with blue eyes, then that was to indicate that the person was dead and had passed into the Afterlife.
Really...THANK YOU for your comment. I LOVE a good academic discussion!!! Keep watching my channel.
@@susaneuler9462 I saw many sculptures and busts in the Pergamon-museum in Berlin in 2020. The first dynasties were without doubt pure western people. We find no non-european faces in the first 4-8 dynasties. For this reason Im sure that from the royal familes down to the middle-class were had all people typically blue, grey and green eyes. Rahotep is from the 4th dynasty and Nefertiti lived while the 18. dynasty. This is a big difference. But its possible that she had blue eyes because their facial features which are clearly european. (Afrocentrists are such idiots, unbelievable!). If you look after people with blue eyes in India, Iran and North Africa, you´ll find enough. So, why Nefertiti should not have had blue eyes? Even in the 18th dynasty lived surely rests of the pure founders and as we know Tutanchamum had western DNA. So, sometimes blues eyes were used as a symbol of divine origin. But in the case of Egypt (Kemet), I dont believe this, because nobody from their gods had or has blue eyes. So blue eyes were surely in Egypt no sign of a higher origin.
@@reneguenon7824 Well...you make valid points, and I do not dispute them. It all points to what I did say in the video, quoting the author Elizabeth Peters. The ancient Egyptians were a different group of humans. They did not fit into a category of what we think of today as "Black" or "White." More research clearly has to be done, using DNA or whatever. BUT...although some have argued that blue eyes were used ONLY as a symbol of divine origin, I did not. I think that the blue eyes of specific sculptures (e.g. Rahotep and Nofret) were symbolizing that they had gone on into the Afterlife. Because - and this is true, you can look it up - when people die, their eyes turn a milky blue. And I think that the ancient Egyptians saw this as an important indication that since we change physically when we die, then (maybe) we move into a different state of being. And...centuries later, blue eyes did became associated with the Eye of Horus etc. So divine origin is part of the story, for sure. But it's not the whole story.
THANK YOU for continuing this discussion. Always a pleasure.
@@reneguenon7824 Oh, and another thing. I did not discuss Nefertiti in the video. She is a mine field of controversy. She does look Caucasian. And why shouldn't she have been? Egypt was a very cosmopolitan society. But as for her brown eyes...well, I am Caucasian, and I have brown eyes. But I assume that her eyes turned a milky blue when she died, and mine will too. That's biology, not a belief system or a racial thing at all. THANKS AGAIN.
@@susaneuler9462 This is a mistake. Race is very important, but the elites today make us believe that race doesnt exist at all and that race dont matters for culture and the quality and strenght of a society. You should read Kevin B. MacDonalds "Culture of Critique" to learn more about the reasons whats going on today in the sciences and politics. And then you should buy and read Edward Duttons "Making Sense of Race" (of course I own a copy in german language with another title). I can´t explain and discuss here all things. Its a good advice to you, no more. We all grew up brainwashed and we as german are more brainwashed and stupid than anybody other nation in the world, believe me.
Anyway, we have all reason to be proud of our race and racial family. The truth is simply, some (not all) of the biggest and most important ancient cultures were founded by indoeuropan and/or caucasian tribes and people. Its also not correct that for instance the vedic culture is a result of the mix between Ariyas (in english: Aryans) and Dravidians. Correct is that they built a cast-system and they used surely dravidians in the first centuries or perhaps over thousands of years (in every case a long long time) for simply servant-works. But the culture and religion as whole was created by indoeuropean people and later corrupted by mixed people with Shudra-minds.This you can see for instance on the fact that Indra in the Bhagavadgita (which I know very good; I started to study Hinduism as I was 19/20 years old and I using also orientalist studies about this subject) changed to Krishna, a kind of black, dravidian Messias or Saviour. The biggest problem today is that we western people own deep complexes and thats why you should read or study MacDonalds work. I read also books about Afrocentrism. This is no game. Some forces trying to destroy our mind, our soul, our race, our history. They steal our culture, our inventions and creations all over the world. The biggest problem is maybe the fact that to much r-selected people with no in-group mentality living amongst us. They are traitor, enemies and worthless for our cultures and societies. If you go deeper in this subject with enough researches (and the material exists, some of this stuff since a long time) you will see the things in the same way if you are not an leftist generally. By he way: Euler is maybe a pseudonym, but a german name. Im sure you know that.
Back to the topic: I had doubts against some presentations from authors like Arthur Kemp ("Children of Ra" and "March of the Titans") before I traveled to Berlin and see this old relicts with own eyes. But its true. There is no difference between the look of the original greeks, romans, persians and egyptians. Should be mentioned in passing H.P.Blavatsky wrote the old vedic people and the egyptians came from the same stock. Some years ago I believed firstly she was mad. (But in fact she was no eurocentric, no ethnocentric, no racist and not even a racialist). Brown eyes are no proof for a mixed blood or genes. Some branches of the caucasian race own darker eyes. (We find in Ireland for instance many people with brown eyes, also in Scotland and some parts of Scandinavia. We know also that some Viking-heroes and leader had dark hair and brown eyes.) Race is a compendium.
All the best!
Ægypt was definitely gaelic
It probably had some gaelic influence. We are everywhere!
@@susaneuler9462 the gaelics are actually the ones who wrote the New Testament
@@susaneuler9462 my father is gaelic and my mother is mayan, not mexican mayan, but real mayans from the captivity, who were housed in cape verde for 400 years. 1600s -1900s .my aunties and grandmother were actually relocated from Connecticut bay , they were the remnant of the mystic massacre. I have a very coincidental life to like i was born under that supernova and my right hand is filled with the stones of the seven sisters. When a nord has kids with a yotan…. I went to a gifted and talented school called hancock for 1-6. Can you read stones?
You made a mistake. The research that said that Ramesses III was of African origin has been proven wrong. Other scientists retested his DNA and found that it was similar to the DNA of Middle Eastern and Central European peoples. The incorrect research supervisor repeated the process again and discovered that he was wrong and that Ramesses II carried the genes of the peoples of the Middle East and Central Europe. Secondly, why did you not mention the red and long hair color of Ramses II? Why did you say that the blue color of the eyes is evidence of death and that the drawings have nothing to do with the person's appearance? The truth is that you did not say anything like this about red skin color. Why did you not mention that the red color of the skin is an indication of strength, and that a person may have white skin, but the Egyptians painted it red, just as they used to paint the eyes blue? You are not objective.Historians did not know the origin of Narmer. They did not know his origin. Historians even debate whether Upper Egypt was white or brown, but what scholars agree on and what has been recorded is that Narmer carried out a massacre of the inhabitants of northern Sudan (Nubians). He killed many of them, but he unified Egypt and equalized Among the Egyptians, whoever did this will make the donkey understand that he was white, or in other words, he had no relationship with the Nubians, as he hated them, so he is Caucasian.
@@MAW51187
Annunaki were the first one's who had blue eyes and rare blood types like the RH Null factor or "Golden Blood" and have higher psychic abilities and can use magic to a higher degree due to their blood having a higher content of Arcane elements due to a alchemical transfiguration, starfire, and incantations which also helped them to shapeshift into their God forms, Demon forms and into other God forms for trickery and deciet.
Shapeshifting is a commen practice in ancient egypt and throughout history, even Jesus was known to shapeshift and take on different froms and in the Stromata it is said he did not have a normal human body but a Divine one made of light.
After the Council of Nicea, they removed the information from declared it heretical and works from the devil (Invented character) modeled after Set the Annunaki god in egypt. Modern religion is degenerate trash that has lost all truths of the REAL mythical christ.
Church father Clement of Alexandria wrote the following around the year 200, in which he claimed that Jesus’ body was unlike that of an ordinary person:
The text read: “Pilate, then, looked at Jesus and, behold, he became incorporeal: He did not see him for a long time,” - (Stromata 6.9)
"After six days Jesus took Peter, James and John with him and led them up a high mountain, where they were all alone. There he was transfigured before them." - (Mark 9:2 )
“There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light. Just then there appeared before them Moses and Elijah, talking with Jesus” ( Matthew 17:2-3 ).
Pseudo-Cyril of Jerusalem On the Life and the Passion of Christ: A Coptic Apocryphon says this about Jesus on page (160-161):
"Then the Jews said to Judas: ‘How shall we arrest him, for he does not have a single shape but his appearance changes.90 Sometimes he is ruddy, sometimes he is white, sometimes he is red, sometimes he is wheat-coloured, sometimes he is pallid like ascetics, sometimes he is a youth, sometimes an old man, sometimes his hair is straight and black, sometimes it is curled, sometimes he is tall, sometimes he is short. In one word, we have never seen him in one and the same appearance."
The Stromata - Clement Of Alexandria - P. 421 states this in regards to Jesus Shapeshifting into a phantasmal form:
"The Gnostic is such, that he is subject only to the affections that exist
for the maintenance of the body, such as hunger, thirst, and the like.
But in the case of the Saviour, it were ludicrous [to suppose] that the
body, as a body, demanded the necessary aids in order to its
duration. For He ate, not for the sake of the body, which was kept
together by a holy energy, but in order that it might not enter into the
minds of those who were with Him to entertain a different opinion of
Him; in like manner as certainly some afterwards supposed that He
appeared in a phantasmal shape (δοκήσει). But He was entirely
impassible (ἀπαθής); inaccessible to any movement of feeling-either
pleasure or pain. While the apostles, having most gnostically
mastered, through the Lord's teaching, anger and fear, and lust, were
not liable even to such of the movements of feeling, as seem good,
courage, zeal, joy, desire, through a steady condition of mind, not
changing a whit; but ever continuing unvarying in a state of training
after the resurrection of the Lord."
Jesus / Yeshua is probably Annunaki or a different alien race that came to teach humans the Law of One more or less.
I am Egyptian..and your talk about us being a multi-ethnic people is wrong. You can search and you will see that Arabs are only 17 percent of Egyptians and European and Asian genes are very few..and the rest are purebred Egyptians and not as they claim that the ancient Egyptians were black-skinned because this is wrong, and we will not allow them to be taken Our history from us !!
Thank you for your comments. However, this video is not about multi-ethnicity or ethnicity at all. It is about the medical fact that at death, a person's eyes turn a milky blue. My research suggests that the ancient Egyptians saw this as a sign that the dead person had passed on into the Afterlife. Thus, some portrait tomb sculptures were portrayed with blue eyes to indicate that the person was DEAD and no longer among the living. Later, blue eyes became associated with the Afterlife and the Gods. I am not taking away your history. I am arguing that the blue eyes of some portrait sculptures may not be an indication of ethnicity at all, but a symbolic representation of death and religious beliefs.
@@susaneuler9462 im already wached the video.. I think you are talking about colored eyes and colored hair that we did not inherit from our ancestors..but their mummy exists and some of them have yellow and red hair, so you should not argue about something very clear.. so sorry, but this is not true. There is a video on my page about what we looked like and what the ancient Egyptians looked like, and you will see an Egyptian person who looks like an ancient Egyptian in everything, even in eye color
@@asmaasayed192 I am not talking about colored eyes or colored hair. Not at all. Here is my point: when people die their eyes turn a milky blue color no matter what the original color was.The ancient Egyptians may have seen this as a sign that the person had passed into the Afterlife., The blue eyes were SYMBOLIC of the fact that the dead person had passed into another realm of existence. Nothing to do with ethnicity AT ALL.
@@susaneuler9462 excuse me lady I got u wrong I'm just going through a difficult phase because of what's going on
@@asmaasayed192 It's perfectly all right! I understand. Things are very difficult right now. I really appreciate your support, and I hope you will keep watching my videos.