Woman dismissed from jury pool describes moment she saw Trump in court
Vložit
- čas přidán 18. 06. 2024
- Kara McGee was dismissed from jury duty on the second day of jury selection in former President Donald Trump’s criminal hush money trial in New York City.
#CNN #News
The fact that so many folks are commenting on how smart she seems reveals how stupid most of us are - she is speaking coherently, that's all.
It's all bots, how have people not realized this yet
@@April-ij4xv You a robot? That's cool, I guess...
what can you expect from people who think a sentence is too long and communicate in emojis
I thought she sounded like a middle school girl.
These people are not the sharpest tools in the shed ... the bar is low ... very , very low 😶🌫️
Not shocking that an intelligent woman was removed from the jury pool.
She said she would not be impartial.....mos tare not this forthright.
No way she was smart, she’s a demonrat
Only on CNN for their narrative
Did you listen to the clip? She literally said as soon as she said it would be hard for her to be there every day at the time needed, the judge dismissed her.
Run on answers, verbose, doesn’t address the questions. This is your typical overeducated, pretentious snowflake
My grandfather served jury duty 35 times in 45 years. How he came to do it that many times is a real mystery. He did however take jury duty very seriously and tried to be as fair and impartial as possible. He would say he aimed to be the type of juror he would want if he ever found himself in the position of a defendant. That is an admirable trait as you only need to look at the comments section in social media to see how biased and hateful some people can be even on the most trivial subjects.
That's a lie. You can't be called more than every 2 years. www.nysd.uscourts.gov/jurors/jury-duty-faqs#:~:text=Under%20Federal%20law%2C%20a%20person,every%20two%20(2)%20years.
They would not want him on this jury then..... They are looking for libtards
If this person dislikes Trump, she definitely does not need to be a juror on this case. Impartiality is key to a fair trial. By the way CNN should be impartial in news coverage, the reporters are biased IMO. To be that way is no different than spreading propaganda, same thing with FOX. We the people deserve better.
@@Willow-fs8dq You can dislike him and stay impartial. Most people dislike Trump, you're not finding 12 people in New York easily if that's your criteria.
@@Andy-gp4zv Most people in cultish blue cities hate him, but the rest of the country knows what a terrific human being he is.
i love hearing the birds singing their hearts out. they have to be louder than the traffic
They are loud wow louder than people and traffic . That's awesome
I will probably be roasted for asking but those are not real bird noises correct? They are so loud it can't be. I did not notice the first time I watched the video. I live in ny.
@@lauretteparrella9597 I read something a while back that mentioned birds have to sing louder now to be able to be heard by other birds in cityscapes in places where it's loud So yes They are struggling to find each other In the concrete jungle They sound very beautiful Though in their struggle
It’s Spring, lol breeding season and trying to attract the mate
They're basically yelling to each other "Will you f me?" 😂
A pity that this articulate and intelligent young woman will not be on the jury.
I thought the same.
12 of her and Trumpsim ends
I doubt the defence will want any women on the jury
So true!
@@markphc99 Because of Batson, you can't strike a juror with one of your 10 peremptories (no cause necessary) if it's for an identitarian reason (race, religion, gender, etc.).
@@markphc99 I think that could be a double-edged sword. There are a lot of men who are feeling victimized by society because of the way women's issues are now coming under scrutiny. An extreme example is that nut in Sydney who knifed women in a mall because he couldn't get a girlfriend.
I hope that the chosen jurors are as articulate and thoughtful as this young woman is.
Yea, and the Rump would be GONE !
They won't be. Lawyers want jurors they can con - er - persuade. Their worst enemy is a juror who can THINK.
We Stand With President Trump 😘🇺🇸
@@donnwzad7980 You got a mouse in your pocket !
Doesn't matter. The jury will be 100% lib Dems. They might as well skip the trial and the judge just declare the verdict as it has already been decided anyway and save everyone's time and money.
Anyone associated with jury duty should be off limits to the media.
She is dismissed. Irrelevant.
She was incredibly articulate when interviewed and asked why she thought she could be unbiased. Her response was to state the reasons she did not like Trump and wanted to hold him to account.
She's not on the jury. She's a private citizen who has every right to say what she pleases about her own experience.
@@MickeyDC-om3pv when did she state she didn’t like Trump?
Yes! And what is this supposed to accomplish
I was a reporter at the jury selection for Jeffery Dahmer in Milwaukee in 1992. It was a closed door session in the judge's chambers with just the attorneys, the judge, three reporters, and Dahmer himself, sitting in a corner of the small room. The dismissed jurors described it as creepy AF.
Trump never ate anyone to my knowledge.
@@Sears111 Don’t give the Dems any more ideas. They’ll cook up a cannibalism case against Trump. Claim the protester who set themself on fire outside the courthouse was Trump’s fault.
Oh, but he will once elected again.😋 Isn't that *really* what this insane circus is all about? If he's such a threat... why not trust *democracy* to do its thing? Weird, huh!?? @@Sears111
@@Sears111 maybe dancer was one of the cannibals who ate Joes uncle?
@@Sears111but he did rape someone so!!!!!
Thank you for letting her stumble and think and give us her real, unrehearsed, honest answers to your questions. That was real and appreciated.
The BEST interview CNN has done in many years
TAKE your horse paste
@@MrBdman72Yeah, agreed. A really fascinating and enlightening interview. Very well spoken member of the public - gives me faith in the jury.
Yes, they let her speak. Also, it sounds as if she were trying to answer in a way that conforms to whatever instructions she was given during the jury screening process.
At what point did she "stumble?"
the man who cheated on wife #1 with #2(who got pregnant while he was still married to #1) cheated on #2 with #3; and cheated on #3 with an adult star and a playboy model, enjoys the full support of the party of "family values"
And one got quickly buried under his golf course after a "fall" at home.
You mean the crime and chaos party .
Trump said he's the most honest guy you've ever met.
It is definitely a head scratcher. When do you think the Democrat party will pause and answer the why? What has the Democrat party become that Americans in support of family values turn to Trump?
*Friendly reminder of the day: No amount of banana republic kangaroo courtism, nor State Department-directed Fake News, will **_EVER_** prevent the rightful occupant of the Oval Office (since 2016) from returning thereto in 2024!*
*TRUMP 2024 - REPEAL THE STEAL!!!*
CNN should have done this interview in a location with more background noise.
"Needs more Cowbell"
LoL…..🤪😂🤣 That was my thought as well!!!💀
and at a Lovin' Spoonful concert.
seems dangerous for them sitting out in the open like that.
This has to be the most pointless interview ever filmed in human history. Great job CNN
Joe Rogan exists
Pointless is a step up the ladder for CNN, at least it's not the usual barrage of lies and ignorance :))
That was an incredibly honest and informative interview. I’ve been listening to politicians and pundits for so long that I had almost forgotten what honesty sounded like on TV. Love this woman!!
Don’t take much to entertain a demonRat
I know, the sun really does shine out of her backside and that view of mine has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that she is politically biased against the former president. Honestly, she's just so informative and honest and courageous. I have never seen somebody more grounded and articulate. We need more fantastic individuals like her
You sure she's politically biased? Could she simply dislike Trump as a human being? Just like the many human beings we run into in our lives whom we dislike but who are not politicians.
@@nucleus14reticularis He thinks observational skill is "political bias".
@@sirmrwuenterpriseinc.ltdso6232 anyone with normal observational ability should be repulsed by trump. anyone not repulsed by trump are the ones with "bias".
just a dude ... as every defendant should be considered.
No way can Mr. Trump be in the same league as ‘The Dude’, from Big Lebowski. Obviously this wasn’t what the young lady meant, but that movie is the first thing I thought of, when she said ‘… just a dude’.
this is Election interference just Remember that , Beijing Biden for Nursing Home 🤡
President Trump is being persecuted by Beijing Biden Administration on fake charges…🤦🏻♂️
Then there is the real world.
@@chrismcdowell7138guy wrote a whole paragraph.
first impression is that she would have made a good and thoughtful juror.
All you snowflakes are the same lol
My first impression…she hates Trump
@@sjp4u338 yeh. shes a woman and the glasses combined already make it an 80% chance.
i mean she is cute, but she gave these long answers with a lot of hmmmms that were going nowhere and still managed to make less sense than one expected all along. if that is articulate to you, you better learn yourself:D
and partisan. She’s obviously a product of contemporary urban academia and we all know what that means.
I'm surprised they can find 9 people in NY that don't foam at the mouth at the mention of his name 😵💫
Welcome to CZcams! What took you so long?
Farcical comes to mind,and Ridiculous 😅
lol
he lives in so many people's heads rent free im suprised he has not been changed with squatting yet
Haha. 12 people plus extras. What makes you think that "foaming at the mention of his name" isn't exactly what they are looking for in a show trial?
She seems smart. It's too bad she won't be on the jury.
@mask: That is exactly the kind of person tRump DOES NOT want on the jury. 🤡
It’s fine. They just have to get 12 people who aren’t complete Trump cultists. The case is pretty straightforward apparently.
@@irenafarmI mean.. she would be a Trump supporter if she was smart, but ok..
@@BugattiFlowif she “were” smart. Ironic, given the point you are laughably trying to make .
good for her!! like you said she smart not wanting to do it, its f%#King boring
To Kara Magee's Mom:
You did a good job...be proud
What about Kara Magee's father? Did he do a good job as well?
@@kennygismo6315
Yeah....what about her uncles & aunts...they maybe raised her too? Do we have any informations about her family & who exactly raised her? (I'm just joking...i'm a goof...🤣🤣🤣)
And her name btw is McGee...like in NCIS......not Magee....😉😉😂😂
It's so odd to see a young person without tattoos and face jewelry, it's almost an enigma
@@marie_84 I grew up in the same town. All along I was ring to send out good vibes, in case she everwas gonna be on the trump jury
@@carmenhogan3334damn relax stay on topic
What a well spoken and perceptive woman!
Feelings of a citizen who telegraphed to the court that it would be inconvenient to do their duty.
So brave.
I'm so impressed with the young lady being interviewed. Calm, articulate, thoughtful in her responses ... It gives me hope.
She may be the only one like this who ends up on the jury though.
@@georgehenderson7783 But she didn't end up on the jury, as she explains.
@@240dc Right. What I'm saying is there may not be any calm, articulate thoughtful people who end up being selected for the jury.
@@georgehenderson7783 Ah, I see. Indeed, we'll have to see how it plays out.
The fact that a young woman , who is given completely standard answers to questions, is being so praised as articulate and intelligent, is scary. I have zero idea if she is intelligent or not , but from this clip , you can not tell. I suspect, that people who watch CNN must be so used to hearing imbeciles, that when they hear a woman give standard answers , they are completely wowed and impressed. Cause you can not tell if this woman is smart or not from this. You can tell she is not dumb , but there is no evidence to show that she is intelligent from this clip
Real talk: I find this woman to be a better commentator than many of the older anchors on this network.
We boomers can share the airwaves, unlike some orange people
Shes not a boomer though @@evank8459
😳😳😳😳
And some young anchors....
Real Talk, why is it that age is the only Demo that people like you feel free to slight?
how can a jury be Impartial when fox names them all out
This interview was done by CNN.
🤦♂️ 🙄
Why on earth would you stage an interview with so much vehicle noise in the background? It made it difficult for me to hear Ms. McGee's comments.
Plus they are breathing in sh…. Stuff.
I hear just fine.
You need hearing aids if you can’t hear this interview. Because it’s even with the background noice very clear, CNN has some great mics
There was one vehicle making noise at the beginning and it was some jerk unnecessarily revving his motorcycle. Why these guys (because it’s guys that do it) feel so inadequate that they have to make all that noise to attract attention is beyond me.
@@durkhubel2650 - His bike is his peen extension.
This young lady has an obvious level of comprehensive intelligence. 11 more like her and you've got yourself a jury worth having. Too bad she's not going to be one of the twelve.
But shouldn't juries be representative of the whole population so there should be at least 5 maga people on that jury?
Not how jury works
Yeah, she's brilliant. I like how she told the judge she could be neutral and then proceeded to rage against Trump because ... feelings. 🤪
@@papawheelie5576 she literally reeeeeeeeeee
Trump is making a complete fool out of himself.
She would have been a great juror.
*would have
@@Karlthegreat84 ...that's funny that you commented this...I am actually back to correct that very issue myself. Lol...I did pay attention in grammar class. However, I do thank you though...seriously. ♥
oh please
No she was familiar with the case and biased so no she would have been terrible
Point of info; All these wars are being Manufactured to usher in the new world order and re-setting the united states and all other countries to accept it as the rule of law! It'll take a 3rd ww3. to complete it! And is suppose to be the head of it! Hello?
CNN was just waiting for her to attack Trump ...but she looks like a wise young woman. Im sure they felt they wasted their time interviewing her 😂
Trump's trial is reminiscent of the Italian courts that tried mafia leaders.
Very articulate young woman. It's a shame she can't serve on the jury.
That's why she was rejected!!
Um ... she's boring.
@@nutmeg208
Whereas you are......??
It's why she's not serving on the jury.
Degree in SJW is likely a plant.
Someone with a vocabulary. Too bad she was dismissed.
Probably why she was.
She never used the word “bigly”. That would be an instant DQ despite her hardship explanation.
@@wyskass861you've never been accused of having a command of the English language.
THE TRUST真相：USA FAKED THE MOON LANDING美国登月造假，MANKIND HAS NEVER LANDED ON THE MOON人类从来没有登陆过月球，THE EARTH IS FLAT地球是平的，100%🚺☝️✝️♾️.。
I’m a bit confused why she was dismissed. She stated that it would be difficult to be a part of this jury because of her job. If every jury consideration was made on the potential juror’s career, most would not serve on a jury. I don’t believe that was the reason she was dismissed. I do believe it was due to her command of the English language and the understanding of the gravity of the moment.
So to sum it up she got dismissed because she said she might not have time to be a jury for that trial and could conflict with her work schedule. “SHOCKING”
Nice change to hear a bright and articulate person being interviewed. Unfortunately, not surprisingly, they dismissed her...
This woman has her shit together. Rock on, sister
she probably has several roommates and she can't do crap outside of her little job. Give us a break.
@@jackremington3397 show us on the doll where she hurt you
@@robertbrown380 I can tell you she was obviously hurt in the upper lip arera.
you know that from a 5 minute interview?
Wow. Yea guess so cause DemonRats think Biden is good ROFLMAO
Thank you to CNN for letting Kara speak; others might have cut her off, trying to drive the convo. But she was worth hearing. Valuable interview.
They still should have hidden her face. MAGA is just crazy enough to to go after her just because she's smart and tells the truth about Orange Jebus.
“So you say you made eye contact with the criminal, would you describe that eye contact as racist, and also why was it so racist?” -CNNBC
Due to all the media hype for more than a year, it will be IMPOSSIBLE to find impartial people for the jury. But, that is why the media hyped it in the first place.
In a city of 8 million people, it should be relatively easy.
@@OMGWTFLOLSMH You couldn't find an impartial jury in the entire Western world of ~ 1 Billion people.
Everyone knows about Trump and has "opinions" about him.
Impartial would be that someone doesn't know about him. Also he is a political figure so voting comes into play and what party you support.
um, and who has complained the most about this? over and over? the master hyper himself. I don't think we get to blame the media for something this man has done almost all of his grown life, which has been to cheat people, lie, etc. etc. He's been proud of it!
You think the media are hyping it to make an impartial trial?? Dude- Trump is one of the most wel known figures in the world, and was one of the most well known New Yorkers for years. His alleged crimes are infamous and famous and very newsworthy. It would be incredibly negligent of media to not report a former president’s alleged crimes when he is the first president to be accused of so many felonies and crimes.
I've always wanted to do jury duty because I would be the perfect juror. I'm an independent, a libertarian, a moderate, and frankly I really don't care what anybody has to say other than the facts and I can see many things that most people can't. However they never call me promptly because of that reason
Congratulations on being too intelligent and aware of the world around you to be chosen for the jury.
Congratulations on not having the guts to serve in the military. Who went in your place?
She wasn’t chosen because of work
@@putnamcountycrimeanalysiswandrsame guy that went in trumps place.
@@putnamcountycrimeanalysiswandr Use your brain, man. God gave it to you to make use of it.
She herself stated it was due to her job. How did you twist it so?
Can't blame her at all , but how can ppl take off 6 wks? That's a problem.
Some people have jobs that pay you for jury duty and hold your position until you return.
@@daltonwilliams2962 Considering the overall expense of a trial, covering juror wages while on duty is conceivable, and when spread out over an entire State budget, inconsequential.
There are laws requiring companies allow you time off for jury duty if at all possible. (If you run your own company or can’t be replaced by anyone then you get out of it…)
Other folks have jobs that will allow them to work hours outside the normal workday.
Like, if I got called for a super long case, I’d be fine because I could take weekends and evenings at the clinic.
Wouldn’t it be cool if Trump had to pay the jurors wages from his fundraising donations - I could get behind that.
"You see Trump sitting there and he is just a guy, just a dude."
That’s just, like, your opinion, man
Instead of paying out another 800 million in fines Murdoch should be put in prison for a couple of years ,
It's obvious from the way she talks that she is somewhat educated; Trump and his team do not want that.
She also had good dental care and hygiene
I’d say more than somewhat educated.
@@Sandra-dt4ec Sarcasm?
She’s definitely college educated
@@keneisner3445 I doubt it. Look at her teeth, they are perfectly straight
I was once called for jury duty in a medical malpractice case. When they found out that I had a PhD in Biology and had taught college-level anatomy and physiology, neither side was interested in me and I was excused. That is the peculiar thing about our system of jurisprudence. It is not interested in coming to a just conclusion. It is only interested in winning and losing. If I had been the MD on trail, I would have wanted a PhD in Biology on the jury. But lawyers want a jury that will believe what the lawyers say without having the knowledge or judgement to assess their words independently. Lawyers want a jury of moldable clay.
That is really sad!
Aren't you supposed to rule based on the evidence presented at trial and not your own knowledge?
Knowledge is beneficial for understanding/evaluating the evidence. That's just common sense.
Yeah anyone with a modicum of knowledge of a crime like this place is unlikely to be picked. Both sides want knowledgeless jurors so they can influence them. That's why say anything tech related, like an Apple vs Samsung case, they basically want jurors to still have Nokia 8610's.
That's what my college professor said, they don't want people with brains, they want people who they can sway with emotional appeals.
I have a Master's degree, so I only got to be an alternate juror. A lot of times when both sides' lawyers walked in front of me and were looking at me, they quickly looked away. I think I scared both sides' lawyers. LOL
Nobody can miss THAT much Work, if paid Hourly......
Could you read more BS into someone glancing at you?
She rocks! Perfect juror for either side.
Perfect juror for justice. I'm sure most 'perfect juror's' are dismissed before they can put their intelligence to work for the justice our system want's, needs and deserves. Hopefully, there will be 18 others just as qualified.
If Biden was on trial, would you want someone lying for the sake of jamming up the process?
I admit, she tried hard to make it seem that way.
Obviously she gave a reason why she was dismissed but, intelligent, confident young woman would have been a hard no from the Mango Mussolini team.
gfy
Mussolini. You mean the demented geriatric who was forcing jabs until Supreme Court stepped in?
Sure, but don't they have to be able to give a stronger reason than that?
@@JohnMoseley Well they could ask her how she feels about being grabbed you know where by a lecherous old goat
Proof the DemonRats are ignorant and stupid
Its not surprising that they picked biased jurors and this lady wouldn’t have played their game Sham administration needs a shame jury
I’ve been called for jury duty and they told us that work is not a valid excuse for dismissal. My guess is it was something else or something very specific about her job that excused her.
Like if she worked at CNN
Very articulate. This is the kind of journalism I prefer to know about.
You think this is journalism. Can’t you see it’s is propaganda. Obviously not. The people commenting on how articulate this woman is are fools. It’s as if articulate people are rare in the US. Oh wait they are a rarity.
Standards have dropped so low that if someone can put together their thoughts for two minutes, people say “WOW! So articulate!”
Yes. Riveting I say.
“I saw trump and knew it was the trump trial.”
CNN really got the scoop with this Mensa member.
She did the interview really well
She would have been a good juror but unfortunately she needs her job. It is understandable why she is not on the jury. If she was in a high paying job or unemployed or self employed, then she could have been a juror.
YEA IF YOU DO NOT LOVE ADOLF TRUMP YOU WONT BE ON ON THE JURY!!!
She looks like Taylor swift
Commie
News
Network
"You can definitely see people looking around" ..what a genius.
Perfect for CNN
The audio engineer must’ve been doing a major cringe waiting for that motorcycle to get out of range. 🥴
Very impressive. She would have been a very respectful, well-spoken and intelligent juror.
Pity she missed out. Can't have someone on the jury with a degree of intelligence can we?
@@jimbo43ohara51 crying always helps to get out of jury duty , hope she don't start no fires..
Well-spoken young woman.
gfy
Yea like Karmala Harris. ROFLMAO
If she is on CNN she was checked out to make sure only negative comments about Trump would come out of her.
Did you even watch the interview? Probably said the least negative things concerning Trump. Very diplomatic.
@@user-eo9cz2gj6q Then CNN had a unusual Trump video.
Exactly hahah
WTF is the big deal? Here I thought there was a punchline as to why she was dismissed, what a waste of my time.
TRUE STORY. I was dismissed as a juror for a murder trial. The defense attorney asked me if the fact that his client had "chosen the gang banger lifestyle" would influence my judgement. I said OH HELL YES and was shown the door.
Well good thing you were not a juror lol
@@prettyblackgirl The accused admitted to being a criminal before the trial.
@@jsmcguireIII I understand. But to be a juror you have to be able to put that aside and focus on the trial and the evidence etc. You cannot be influence by anything not even the fact that the person is a criminal. I'm not saying you are in the wrong I simply saying that you were not fit to be a juror at that trial.
@@prettyblackgirl Oh, you're such a dreamer. If only that was how jury selection actually worked. The fact is, lawyers choose jurors who they believe will support their side. Failing that, they choose those whom they think are easily manipulated. I was dismissed from JD by a prosecutor whose question I answered with, "It depends."
Similar thing here. The lawyer asked if I had a problem sentencing a "fellow human" to be put to death. I replied, rather quickly, "None at all." I was back home in half an hour.
Of course they got rid of the intelligent, articulate, thoughtful, and genuine jury candidate from serving in that capacity.
Which side dismissed her? I'm guessing the prosecution.
@@bonnierobb9211 the judge did, after she said I cannot judge this trial fairly. I’m thinking after she was chosen, her family said are you crazy don’t be on that controversial jury. So she bailed out.
@@MalibuBarbie-kk5gcdid you watch the video?
He's entitled to a jury of his peers. An intelligent, articulate, and thoughtful person is the furthest thing from his peer. More like incoherent, entitled, and superficial.
I don't want to hear about your race or gender, or "equity", or Alphabet people. What i do want to hear about is affordable healthcare, safe borders, more police funding, harsher prison sentences for violent crime, Universal Basic Dividend, federal jobs guarantee, raising taxes on large corporations and breaking up monopolies in tech and pharma. Once I start hearing about that maybe I'll consider voting for you. If however you make it about left cultural issues, I will vote against you.
Thank goodness 🎉 people are saying intelligent? It took her like 10 minutes to explain what it was like to see TRUMP in person.... NEXT!!!!
The jurors will need to be very protected
Why
She is pretty darned good speaking to the camera, good vocabulary too. Not overwhelmed at all.
She lives in Manhattan. There are plenty of young people like her there.
@@Greg-jw2gb I've been in Manhattan in the Financial District, I was not impressed. My boss who was with me on the trip commented that the people "live like hamsters." I remember the scaffolding everywhere, the cranes, narrow streets where you don't stand on the corner because you might get hit by cab, and the traffic backups and the insane number of people on the sidewalks. Oh, and the smelly beggar going through a packed subway car of people asking for money.
Why would she be Overwhelmed Jury duty is jury duty it doesn’t matter who it is it’s the case that has to be proven
yeah not everyone is trumpfart LOL. no hillillies in ny
@@irmapugh6497 Not sure what part of this you missed. 1) she never got to hear any evidence because she was dismissed and 2) I was talking about being in front of a live news camera, on air; that is not a job everyone can do, and some people are overwhelmed.
A defendant has the right to a jury of one's peers, does that mean that the jury has to be crooks, assaulters, liars, etc?
That’s just a hangover from English law, where there are still, nominally two classes of “His Majesty’s Loyal Subjects”. Nobility (lords, earls, dukes etc.) and commoners (Sirs, Dames, Mr, Mrs etc). Nobility are tried in the House of Lords by the other “Peers”, while commoners get a jury of commoners.
In the USA, you did away with that class split so every adult is the peer of everyone else. In Britain, today, it makes virtually no difference, in practice, though being, say, an Earl might get you listened to, a bit like being a Kennedy, or a Bush would do in the US.
Cmon man really?
@@q.e.d.9112… no class system in the U.S.? Have you not been following Trump’s ongoing delay tactics, not to mention ignoring legal gag orders with zero punishment?
@@jerryeberts There is no formal class system in the US or any modern western country but human nature being what it is, it's no wonder the ones with the dough and the rizz are getting more traction in court.
@@jerryeberts
I didn’t say there was no class system in the US, just that it wasn’t formalised as it is in Britain, where members of the Peerage cannot be tried in a normal court. They still get put on trial. In fact, I’d argue that they’re more likely to be held to account, than the super rich in the US, because the Lords, as a body, tend to take a dim view of one of their own getting caught out.
Don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying there’s no corruption in the UK nor, that having high powered lawyers, won’t affect the outcome you can expect, but the judiciary in Britain would have squashed Trumps behaviour long ago. Any attempt at witness intimidation would have been jumped on and he’d be awaiting trial in one of His Majesty’s Prisons, by now.
CNN needed to give this Lady a job at the news station..
She articulated so clearly...
If you think she should be a CNN contributor that alone is sufficient reason for her to not be on the jury. CNN is incapable of being fair to anyone not on the far left.
She did a good job in this interview. At the end one still could not tell if she had personal bias one way or another.
There are ZERO non-biased jurors for this case.
By design. A kangaroo court cannot operate with unbiased jurors.
Sounds like she would’ve made a good juror.
you too???
So would you, based on the fact you correctly wrote would’ve and not would of.
What ever she won’t be andddddd
DemonRats have never been accused of being smart
If Biden was on trial, would you want someone lying for the sake of jamming up the process?
An articulate intelligent lady who gives the impression she has media experience, strong eye contact with the camera, easy manner and confidence. She could almost be a TV presenter
She spoke English and used hand gestures. So impressive!
I love this chick: especially how she described Trump: "He is just a dude!" LOL!
Chicks and dudes. How very American!
In the end, we are all just mortal people. It's seen as unrealistic among some I encounter for some odd reason, but my parents and grand parents always taught me and my siblings and cousins that no one is superior to any of us. I say it's odd because some say that mindset is defensive, but I think it is reality. Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, etc. all will also die one day, that Apple Computer guy DID die.
@@thomasmaughan4798Dude where's my car? 🚗
I am amazed that CNN gave her the time for her thoughtful and intelligent response.
barf
ROFLMAO
Whatever, Ivan
“I saw trump and knew it was the trump trial”
Brilliant. 🤦♂️
In other breaking CNN news, 1+1=2 and water makes you wet.
Its nice seeing a fairly normal person talking on the news. Not some enraged lunatic shouting all the time.
So exactly *what* did we learn by listening to this "news"?
Nothing much
A very articulate and intelligent woman. Trump’s lawyers don’t want people like her on the jury.
Neither do Dems!
@@michaelnoviello6302 Move to Russia, traitor.
I mean she said why she was removed. She has job responsibilities and cant be available for 6 weeks.
@@michaelnoviello6302 I agree with you. Trump should have a jury of 12 intelligent and articulate men and women. I’m sure that’s what Trump’s hoping for.
@@Struieboy If Trump wants intelligent jurors, that would eliminate the MAGA crowd. But let’s be real, MAGA people aren’t getting past the prosecutors during jury selection.
She had me at “gravitas”😅
😂😂😂😂 Yep! " gravitas" ,good one !!!😅
Great film company!
With a little training, this former potential juror would make a great reporter herself!
white privilege does that
Amen.
They will never put anyone with integrity and intelligence on that jury…. The trial simply shouldn’t be happening.
The witches in Salem had a better chance of getting a fair trial than Trump will in NY
The difference being the "witches" were being tried for something imaginary. Trump is being tried for crimes he's confessed to.
oh dear god do not compare those innocent souls to this monster, rapist, and pedo
I was in the jury waiting pool for a couple of days, and almost every person seated around me was bitching and complaining about having to do jury duty, and what a burden it was. Then we were all marched into a courtroom, and questioned. The first question was "would you be pleased to be on this jury"?. For some reason (fear of authority?) every other person enthused wildly about how they were happy to be given such an opportunity. When it was my turn to answer, I said 'well no, I'd rather be at work." I was dismissed immediately. I thought that was kind've ironic, the process basically screened out the only person in the room who wasn't lying.
I was on a jury pool for a pain and suffering civil suit. When asked how I felt about it by the plaintiff attorney I responded, "People cause me pain and suffering everyday, I don't sue them." Dismissed.
Out of all these comments, yours is definitely the most real and honest. The others seem like trolls trying to bolster this pathetic situation for what waa once the greatest justice system we could have faith in; to be impartial and fair. No more.
There is no justice in any sanctuary city court room!! The law is using to protect criminals. When I was in a LA criminal court jurors pool, judge ask us to talk about our bad experience with police. Everyone tried so hard to pleased the judge and lie about how they were mistreated by police. I am the only one dare to say I have great experience with the police. The evil judge kicked me out of her court room right away!
Yes they typically seem to prefer liars -- those who will say other things On the Record.
She should be part of the CNN team. She is more articulate then some anchors.
Wow. You were called for jury duty, found out it was the trial concering Trump and then you were dismissed from jury duty.
How is this news?
What an intelligent, well-spoken person. A shame she’s not on the jury.
She was dismissed because she is clearly intelligent. Trump doesn't want smart people on his jury.
She clearly said she didn't have enough time.....
Obama hasnt wanted anyone smart as President either
"I got hairy legs that turn blonde in the sun.
The kids used to come up and reach in the pool & rub my leg down so it was straight & watch the hair come back up again.
So I learned about roaches, I learned about kids jumping on my lap...I love kids jumping on my lap"
Didn’t have time to be a juror because of her job. But plenty of time to do interviews. Must want the publicity.
@@avgejoeschmoe2027what the heck are you talking about?
He also doesn't want anybody working for a living and having something called work ethics on the jury. And no women - I doubt a woman would be willing to consider Trump whoring around right after his wife gave birth a minor mistake - even if that isn't on trial.
"He's just a guy"....she wasn't star struck. I wish there'll be more of her on the jury.
This is ridiculous.
no it isnt
Stop 🛑 bothering the jury
The super genuineness and the fact that this person is talking about the experience is oddly very comforting! I can’t imagine if I were called, and yeah, it’s fascinating to hear a first hand account of that experience.
It sounds like this young lady would have made a great juror! Shes very well-spoken and seems very smart.
I'd of risked it all to BS my way into being a juror to this just so I can say 'guilty' .
Typical Democrat. The truth doesn't matter, just the outcome.
Typical left. Truth is irrelevant to you.
"Oh, they HAD to get rid of her because she's intelligent"....I bet they all are intelligent, and you are insulting the ones who are not let go.
There is a reason they dismissed her. Cmon, man
Based on this question we can expect the jury to be a group of unemployed people?
It’s refreshing to hear comments from an intelligent, thoughtful person about their experience.
"of course they dismissed this smart articulate woman" duh she literally said shes not a fan of trump on camera. its basically impossible to find an unbiased American for this case I dunno what the plan was supposed to be here
Why wouldn’t she be more upset that Trump is being persecuted like the opposition leader in a third world Banana Republic? I would have already been protesting.
The only people that are gonna find for a jury are retired or unemployed.. who can take six weeks off of work to be on a jury??
Not true. My job pays for any jury duty. Just depends on the job.
They legally have to let you off if you can be replaced without undue hardship.
And live under a rock not knowing anything about this!!??
Retired now. But my company would of allowed me to serve and paid my salary too. But that is rare.
Not true here in the UK you get called and you are not allowed to refuse. You can go to prison and people do if you don't have a legit reason. Having a job is NOT good reason. One woman on my jury said she had to financial year end and the judge said utter nonsense, it's your civic duty and he refused her to stand down.
Cool thing to experience. She is extremely well spoken. I appreciated the inside “look.”
What’s her job title,Facebook fact checker?
Shes talking like a normal person
Remember FOUR grand juries already viewed the evidence and all four handed down record numbers of indictments.
I was on a grand jury last year.
Five indictments is a lot of crimes!!
remember this case was investigated 7 years and NO WRONG DOING WAS FOUND and alvin bragg said their was no case
So you are party to lawfare against Donald Trump, that will not go well for you.
You can indict a ham sandwich in NYC
@@reelrocknrolla4251 that is very true and they just busted a juror for his hatred of trump on facebook today and he claimed he could be impartial ,what a joke
@@reelrocknrolla4251 NO, you can't! Try it and you'll see.
Just a dude is SO well said.
This is how people should think of him.
Reporters, whether CNN or otherwise, should keep their mouths shut about anything that might lead to the identification of jurors. I'm a lifelong journalist and I will say that there is not an iota of proof that consumers of news need to know who will be serving on the Trump jury. All identifying them will do is put them at risk for their personal safely from those who already have voiced a willingness to bring harm to those people charged with making a judgment.
This trial is about election interference . I wish the media would explain about this and drop the ' hush money ' title.
He's being tried for a lot of things he allegedly did wrong, this one is not the one your thinking of.