Tarantino - Give Up, On Giving Up
Vložit
- čas přidán 25. 04. 2024
- With Quentin Tarantino's next movie, The Movie Critic, now cancelled it begs the question - is his infamous ten movie limit hampering his creativity? What is the end goal of this fixation on his legacy and how his films will be remembered? Do directors get worse as they get older?
Follow me on TWITTER: @FullFatVideos -
Follow me on INSTAGRAM: full_fat_videos
/ full_fat_videos
Any donation you make on PATREON helps Full Fat Videos to keep making content. Find out more at: ► / fullfatvideos
Facebook: / fullfatvideo
All footage used in this video is for educational purposes only.
#tarantino #themoviecritic #onceuponatimeinhollywood
If you want early releases, my thoughts on the Deadpool and Wolverine trailer, written essays and video scripts then please join my patreon! www.patreon.com/fullfatvideos
If Steven Spielberg had stopped at 10 movies we never would’ve gotten Jurassic Park, Schindler’s List, or Saving Private Ryan. I’m all for forcing yourself to consider if a story is really worth telling, but yeah acting like 10 is a necessary cutoff is silly at this point.
But that was his whole thing
If Steven Spielberg had only made 10 films he’d have known that and been more choosy with his projects. Not only that but it would be way better.
You can’t just count the first ten movies and say anything past those “would never exist” cuz that’s not how it would work. Other movies that he did make wouldn’t exist
Spielberg doesn’t write his movies. and since the beginning even from Kill Bill, Quentin has begun numbering them. I think it’s cool
Two different style of directors. Not really an argument
@@markdarc0448exactly
So many people think Quentin Tarantino is just going to disappear after his 10th movie when he’s express so so so much that he wants to write novels, a live action theater play of Reservoir Dogs, Hateful Eight, plus new stories, and even wants to write a TV show. Plus he just had a kid and from his recent interview with Kimmel… Quentin is spending A LOT of time with his child which is nice. He’s past 60 and there’s not much time left. 10 movies to me is cool. His filmography is AMAZING. In the opening of Kill Bill it was already numbered as the 4th film by Quentin Tarantino and 10 is a cool aesthetic number. 10 isn’t like 11 or 12. 10 has that ring to it.
Glad this all sounds so hunky dory for you. Personally, I think he should stick to making movies. His books haven't been nearly as entertaining and it would be a shame to not see him using his full talents. And Kill Bill? He's been numbering them since Reservoir Dogs. 10 is an amazing...sorry, AMAZING number, but you know what sounds even better? The 15th film from Quentin Tarantino
I loved his novemization of Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. I'd totally be down to read more of his work whether it be more novelizations or original material.
“He’s past 60 and there’s not much time left” no, he has at least 20 years left to make movies.
I want to see a MUSICAL of “Reservoir Dogs”! And the thugs in the heist would KICK like The Rockettes!!
But at the end of the day 11 good movies is more impressive than 10. And 12 good movies is more impressive than 11.
That doctor joke was actually really clever. 👍
Hollywood needs the old-school auteurs like Tarantino more than ever
There are lots of good moves coming out especially character pieces
Saying he was only doing ten feels like it put immense pressure on him to make something amazing. Should've just stopped at ten if that what he wanted to do and not publicized it so much.
Top 5-kill bill, pulp fiction, inglorious basterds, Django, Jackie brown
Directors, even Tarantino, have to be conscious of making a movie that will sell. Making a big fuss about the 10th movie, the last Tarantino movie, is giving himself the opportunity to do whatever he wants.
Personally, I loved the concept of "The Movie Critic", but he must have a reason for scratch it. Who knows
Honestly, once upon a time in Hollywood, to me, it was the perfect way to go out it felt like an epilog like a good way to wrap it up if you watch all his work it felt like a natural end
I agree
Nah, mate. You want him to keep directing cause YOU want to see more of his films. But you only want to see them because they're of a certain quality. There's a difference between early Bob Dylan and Dylan nowadays, whom no one gives much of a shit about anymore. The decision of making 10 films speaks of an artistic integrity to his work that is rare in Hollywood, and the fact that everyone is freaking out over it just shows how painfully greedy and artistically ignorant we are.
Then there’s Scorsese
@@samburnscomposer True. Just to clarify, I'm not implying that all artists should retire, just that this collective refusal to accept Tarantino's decision is greedy and entitled.
@@TheXelsky Yeah true, I mean he won’t even stop creating art just feature films. Plus he even mentioned doing short films and tv shows in an interview I read too. I like his films but I’m not bothered if he stops because it’s true many artists don’t tend to keep up with the same quality of work over time. Quality is better than quantity
I love how on his letterboxed it says “Director of 16 films” lmao
there's a pretty good reason why all the "films" that don't count, don't count. so let's go through them all.
My Best Friend's Birthday: it's a short and not a full film, it was also made before he began counting.
Kill Bill: The Origin of O-Ren: again a short, Tarantino said he would only make 10 films, that says nothing about shorts, tv shows or books. so after the 10 he make as many of those as he wants.
Reservoir Dogs (1991): another short film that works as a proof of concept of the movie he would do the following year. do i need to say more? let's move on
Kill Bill: The Whole Bloody Affair: it's just both kill bill films put together, obviously it doesn't count. but funnily enough, this is actually the only kill bill film that counts in Tarantino's eyes. because to him both volumes are one movie. he wrote it as one so that's how he counts it.
Four Rooms: he only directed one out of four stories in this one, which was basically the same length as a short film. So he doesn't count it as one of his films.
Grindhouse: this is just a compilation of Death proof and Planet Terror, sure they were made to be watched together, but only one of them was made by Tarantino and that one is already on the list.
So there you go, an explanation for the missing 7 movies. hope that helps. I might have gone a little over bored but I had fun writing this and that's all that matters to me.
@@Sophie_the_Sapphic You must be a real hoot
@@MMartinVideoI mean tbf it was actually really interesting information lol
@@Sophie_the_Sapphic Not to mention, Tarantino has directed episodes of TV as well.
I can see one of two thing happening with QT
1: he makes his tenth movie, retires, then comes back a few years later to make "just 1 more" the way Hayao Miyazaki keeps doing.
2: he dies before making the 10th movie. And his legacy is forever stamped with the question "what if......"
Unless you’re name is Gene Hackman, I don’t ever believe you’ll retire, especially if you’re a writer/director like Tarantino.
True. I don’t think he’ll last 5 years before making an 11th movie, or at least experiment with a miniseries.
He should give another try with STAR TREK
“My phaser’s the one that says ‘Bad Muthafucka’ on it.”
I want a Tarantino slasher horror movie. Imagine the suspense he could build, the gnarly kills and the comedic relief. It would be a masterpiece. Especially with his affinity for the legacy of Hollywood, horror in film from Psycho to Halloween to Alfred Hitchcock, he could have a blast.
He already did one, it's called Death Proof, check it out
@@Jakeshangout2251Ehhhhhh, that’s not quite the same energy as what I think OP is describing. Kurt Russell is definitely a killer obviously, but it’s still more Grindhouse (as is the name of the Double Feature that Death Proof released as) in general. I definitely think it could be cool if Tarantino made a more classic slasher movie.
Also he loves De Palma, I'd really like to see all the homages to him he would throw into such a movie
They offered Halloween to him at some point, It could have happened
If QT doesn’t want to make this movie, he must have a damn good reason.
I don’t want only one more movie but frankly he must know best.
i bet it was shaping up better as a book pr something.
@@bloodlinefilms does he care about authoring?
@@odiedodieuk he did his own novelization of once upon a time in hollywood. it was longer and more in depth. he has done a few books i think.
I see people say that if he wants to stop directing than he should but my problem is with his reasoning not that he wants to stop.
His reasoning seems to be he doesn't want to stick around so long to the point he's not wanted or respected anymore. He just wants to create something of quality. He's allowed change his mind and say "You know what? 14 movies it is" (or whatever)
I respect him so much, but he has to take risks to some degrees as some of his best movies came from taking risks. Being obsessed with legacy can be harmful to a degree.
10:35 DAMNNNN 😂
As a creator I do kinda get Quentin's stubbornness on his creative work, having a streak of work that you're proud of all the way through has gotta be one of the most satisfying accomplishments you can have. I will say though life is a journey that throws things you can never account for and breaking the rules and making an 11th or 12th movie not only would be less restrictive but it would make for an even more awesome legacy.
He's really fixated on the number ten...and possibly wanting the weight off his shoulders that comes with the high expectations for each film. But at the end of the day 11 quality movies is better than 10. And 12 is better than 11. Guys like Spielberg and Scorsese should always be ranked higher if Tarantino only does 1 more.
I think Tarantino has a good point though. A lot of directors look incredibly detached from reality at the end, I think of Fellini trying to portray the new disco era failing miserably. Fellini grew up in rural Italy and he didn't have a clue about cultural trends in society anymore. Tarantino always quotes Rio Lobo as an example of older directors losing their talent, especially in those years (the new Hollywood era) it was pretty common watching the old guard failing to understand new themes and styles coming from a younger generation of directors (Scorsese, De Palma, Cimino, Coppola, etc).
You *NEED* to see "Four Rooms"! I'll admit. It starts off weak with a segment involving witches, but that's as bad as it gets. You'll probably find Robert Rodriguez's short the funniest because those kids are fantastic (I personally love the one with Richie Apriele with a gun and his wife), but the punchline in QT's is completely worth the wait! It's the perfect ending for the whole movie!
I don’t get why Tarantino’s only doing a specific amount of movies. I’m gonna make as many movies I want till I either lose interest with movies, run out of ideas, make a movie that’s so bad I give up, or die.
Plus he already did his 10th movie...Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. He may not like it but Kill Bill was released as two films...several months apart. The studio won and split it in two. Pretending otherwise is revisionist history. If he's focused on only doing one more film he will probably drive himself crazy trying to end his career on a high note. I wouldn't be surprised if he writes another script...realizes it's not as good as The Movie Critic...and then winds up making The Movie Critic a few years from now.
I feel 13 is the magic number for Tarantino
Truth is there is no magical number.
It's like if Scorsese stopped after Goodfellas. We wouldn't have gotten Cape Fear, Casino, Gangs of New York, The Aviator, The Departed, Shutter Island, The Wolf of Wall Street, The Irishman, Killers of the Flower Moon, etc.
Really great video, thanks.
Some of the word drags in this episode were PEAK Full Fat
I loved Four Rooms. It's definitely worth a watch.
I know he's talked about doing 2 books. And one of them was the "Once Upon a Time in Hollywood". I would love to see The Film Critic get turned into the other one.
If it’s the only way we’re ever gonna get it then I will be satisfied
Its simple, if he's written it then I want to see it. Its a tragedy to waste a good screenplay but especially a Tarantino screenplay.
If he's focused on only doing one more film he will probably drive himself crazy trying to end his career on a high note. I wouldn't be surprised if he writes another script...realizes it's not as good as The Movie Critic...and then winds up making The Movie Critic a few years from now. Plus he already did his 10th movie...Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. He may not like it but Kill Bill was released as two films...several months apart. The studio won and split it in two. Pretending otherwise is revisionist history.
@@GrantPearson Agreed, Kill Bill is two films whether he likes it or not because at the end of the day people paid to see two movies. I just think this obsessive idea of having what he considers to be “10 perfect movies” and calling it a day feels is somewhat understandable if the idea of filmmaking is not longer appealing to but I think it’s kind of silly, sure take a break for a few years and see how you feel in a decade but to say your stopping for good feels like burning your bridge. He also uses the metaphor of directors being like boxers because they “have their time” meaning they have a peak and then a decline, sure that goes for most of us in our life we don’t stay spring chickens forever but that theory just isn’t accurate in the world of artists since Scorsese, Akira Kurasawa as well as many other directors have proved that theory absolutely wrong.
@@artofsam In addition to having a fixation on the number ten I think he also wants the weight off his shoulders. There's high expectations with every movie he does so he probably wants relief from that. However, the most based thing he could do is to keep making great films for a few more decades...show us how brilliant he is by defying the odds and NOT going into a decline. It seems he doesn't have the cojones to keep at it the way Scorsese does. I hope I'm wrong though and he makes several more.
@@GrantPearson I certainly hope so, cinema as an art form needs people like him now more than ever, we need more directors that challenge the status quo and this mass sterilisation of art that is wreaking havoc everywhere.
Ok you got a chuckle out of me with that Harvey Orc bit.
AND HOW HAVE YOU NOT SEEN 4 ROOMS???
Coppola is another good example of this as well. Will he be remembered for Jack and Twixt, OR will he ALWAYS be remembered for film masterpieces like Godfather Part I and II, Apocalypse Now, Rumble Fish, The Conversation, Bram Stoker's Dracula? And even all his lesser ones, you can simply respect it as him constantly taking artistic risks, like One From the Heart. Hell, the new one that's he's been trying to getting it out, Megalopolis, it may be a disaster, but knowing him as an artist, you can't help but f**k with the passion that he has for this decades old long awaited project.
Tarantino has always come across to me as someone who cares massively what other people think, the kind or artist who can look past 99 good reviews and get hung up on the negative one. Thats just who he is.
Great video ❤
Love the way this guy bookends his sentences...😆 0:40 0:54 1:08 1:13 1:22 1:43
I really hope he makes that tenth film still, and still utilizes Tom Cruise... That'd be incredible.
Top five would have to be:
Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Pulp Fiction
Inglorious Basterds
Django
Reservoir Dogs
Tom's my favourite actor so I'd love to see that.
I think what we need more than anything IS for Tarantino to quit and stop at 10 (even if it is dumb that kill bill is technically 2)
I love certain aspects of franchises a lot but you cannot deny that Hollywood is doing it far too much when it’s not appropriate. What Tarantino quitting would do would shake up the industry and tell the world “maybe we don’t need to milk everything” and that’s, in my opinion what we need more then good filmmakers. We need the industry to be shaken up so that good filmmakers actually shine through.
And Tarantino wants to do it anyway. So let him.
In my opinion all this does is reinforce the “milking” that Hollywood is training us for. I love it, I need it, give me more, keep the system going, give me more and more and more. It’s greed. And we need to respect the filmmakers and artists who say “No, I’m done”
I'll always remember his very memorable small role on Alias.
Actually you could tarnish your cinematic legacy with a giant stinker. I did temporarily lose faith in Scorsese when I saw The Irishman, but luckily Killers of The Flower Moon was a quick return to form.
I think Tarantino is mostly worried about ending up like Francis Ford Coppola, who really did lose the plot in the 90s and did make nothing but trash, his Dracula being his last good movie.
If it was 10 or 15y ago, I have no doubt in my mind that this film would have happened. Now w this ten movie limit his putting a absurd amount of pressure on himself, cause now it has to be on par w the best ideas he ever put on a screen or its not worth making it
I agree!
Four Rooms is awesome, especially Tarantino's segment.
he also directed a couple of episodes of ER, IIRC
Besides the arbitrary "10 films" to retire by "age 60," let us all remind ourselves that George Miller is still making Mad Max films at age 80. QT may like to remember that.
Ive been a QT fan since 97. My friend played Reservoir Dogs in our tv production class and I was hooked. My top 5 favorite from him is Kill Bill1+2, Reservoir Dogs, Django, Pulp Fiction and Once Upon a Time. However, I love all his films...even Deathproof 😂 I totally get what hes about... literary schema in a Cinema aesthetic. His novels are going to be awesome too. He's a name brand director with decades of success and influence, he can go for as long as he wants too. Ive never heard anyone say he lost his edge or he was falling off, he's always gotten better. Personally, I wouldn't mind a return to the LA gangster world...but told in a multigenerational Godfather style.
The first half of Death Proof is almost unwatchable due to its execrable dialog. Overall, still better than Kill Bill 1+2, though.
I'm a big Tarantino fan but I could have done without some of his stuff such as Death Proof, The Hateful Eight and the Kill Bill stuff.
Spot on,he's more interested in legacy,than love for filmmaking,plus I really didn't like OUTIH,I thought it was overrated and self-indulgent,so he already made as far as I'm concerned a movie that sucks(although everyone keeps praising it,for some odd reason)shame,to learn this,I was waiting for "The Critic"to wash away the disappointment of OUTIH,let's hope he changes his mind or that this is just a rumor.
Nice of you to refer to him as a cutie all video
Top 5 Tarantino movies:
1. Inglorious Basters
2. Django
3. Pulp Fiction
4. Reservoir Dogs
5. Hateful Eight
The only other one I've seen is OUATIH and that was only once, so I didn't think I could rank it with the others i've seen multiple times.
Kill Bill is one movie.
Try and find The Whole Bloody Affair, the right vision a tad below 4h. The one without the Pai Mei flashback, that obviously wasn't shot by QT and wasn't part of the movie.
There are good 1080p fan edits of what Kill Bill was supposed to be.
After watching it, come back and tell us again these are two separate movies.
Also, maybe I missed you mentioning it, QT disavows Natural Born Killers. Although I love this movie, it has nothing Tanrantino in it. Just some ideas from his original script like the names of the characters carried on into the final project.
Last thing, he's saying he'd stop after 10 movies, it doesn't mean he can't go into other medium like books or TV shows.
Anyways, these are just my thoughts.
Cheers from France! 🍻
I would hope he gets into making shows.
Apparently he wrote something like a whole episode of Bounty Law during Once Upon A Time In Hollywood, and I would love to see that get produced. Or really any of the fake movies from his career I’d love to see, The Fourteen Fists of McCluskey probably being the top.
@@samuelbarber6177 Same.
2:38 That quote sounds more to me like a hope to go out on a high note, not so much leaving room to keep going if his tenth isn't a success. Like, he's stopping at 10 and hopes that last one is good, securing his legacy.
..."Start to SUFFFAHH" 😂
The 10 Movie limit is so strange. Why limit your creativity?
He might want the weight off his shoulders that comes from the high expectations everyone has.
The lego batman sets in the background look fire 🔥
Thanks!!!
Hey now. Cosmopolis was pretty awesome. Very faithful to the book.
I did not enjoy the movie!
The 12th film from Quentin Tarantino sure does have a nice ring to it.
top 5 :
5. Reservoir Dogs
4. Inglorious Bastards
3. Django Unchained
2. Once Upon A Time In Hollywood
1. Kill Bill vol. 1&2
Great vid and i agree on near enough every point. I got no issue wid him wanting to retire tho the reason his given i take issue with, 10 is a pretty silly number for someone who's legacy is already secured in cinema history and for someone who may stop directing but will defo still work in film to some degree. And like u said full fat losing him in these times with cinema being at an all time low would be such a shame. He could inject a much needed boost. Only thing i disagree on would be him going to to TV. Would i be disappointed if he left cinema and moved to TV? Yh. But would i be gassed to still get his works in some form? Definitely.
10:36 *Im so sorry mate.* 😢😢😢😢😢
Why am I getting the feeling that Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is going to be his last movie?
My answers to your questions #1. No QT shouldn't stop at ten movies. He should keep making films whenever he feels the need whether it's 10 films or 13 or whatever.#2. Yes. I definitely wanted to see The Movie Critic. It sounded really interesting. Now as to my top 5 QT films #1. Pulp Fiction #2. Kill Bill (1&2) #3. Inglorious Basterds #4. Once Upon A Time In Hollywood #5. Resevoir Dogs 👍😎
I think movie critic would’ve been a great film, limiting himself to 10 movies probably will deny us of some fantastic movies
I do agree that directors get worse as they get older, I mean can you name a director that consistently maintained their quality as they went on? Even Spielberg, while he still makes great films, they’re nowhere near the majesty of his output in 70s & 80s. Getting worse as you get older is a natural thing, but it doesn’t inherently make you bad at this.
how about scorsese? Isn't the 2010s the most reflective and dare I say best era of his filmography? Man is in his 80 and still able to direct Wolf of Wall Street, killers of the flower moon, silcence, the irishman - that's incredible range right there and all comment on his previous movies, even develop on them.
@@newwave26
I’ll be honest, I have not enjoyed Scorsese’s stuff over the past decade+, most of it I just find ponderous & incredibly boring.
@@SmashBrosAssemble I respect your opinion. However, I still think Scorsese can make decent films despite his age. They might be overlong and "boring", yes, but you can't deny that they're competence piece of filmmaking, and that they are progression of a career. Tarantino giving up in his 50 or so is, thus, irresponsible.
Clint Eastwood did Million Dollar Baby at 74, and Gran Torino a few years after that. Kurosawa did Ran at 75. George Miller did Fury Road at 70.
It can and has been done.
My top five Tarantino films are:
1. Django Unchained
2. Once Upon A Time in Hollywood
3. Pulp Fiction
4. Inglourious Basterds
5. Reservoir Dogs
What he should do is make all the movies he never made into one movie called The Auteur, which could be a semi autobiografical parody of trying to make the perfect film in lieu of criticism and praise from his previous work, and trying to achieve the impossible task of creating one final film to be remembered as the greatest filmmaker who ever lived. Make it very tongue in cheek, maybe even have the director kill himself after creating that final movie, thinking it's the greatest thing in the world or so that he's not tempted to make anything more, but the movie is a failure upon release, or perhaps someone even kills him before he can ever make that final movie, either way, there's no way to win because of the metaphor of the metacommentary. I don't know, I'm not a Tarantino expert, I've only seen each of his films once, but if he's having such a hard time coming up with a final movie, maybe he should make the final movie about trying to make that final movie. He only has himself to blame in the pressure he's putting upon himself, but unless it just comes off as a big wank fest over how great he thinks he is, then it might just work.
I hadn't been previously aware that THE CRITIC was going to be within the same world as OUATIH, very interesting. Ultimately, a filmmaker (or any artist, really) should only ever be accountable to themselves, but as you imply, that doesn't really seem to be what Tarantino's doing here. He obviously has the right to make or not make anything he wants, but he seems to be paralyzed almost at this idea of what the audience will think of him. This all alludes to the somewhat pretentious side of him that's always been the thing that's most turned me off about him.
Personally I think an artist needs to make some duds to get truly great movies, novels ect and be ok with that. We’re only human
Good video, side note: House of Gucci is great and is one of the most misunderstood movies of the 2020s
I did enjoy it! But he won’t be remembered for it
I wish he gave his scripts to other directors and he sort of produces them .
Four Rooms is okay. The first room is the weakest, the second is okay, but it partially sets up the third and fourth, the third and fourth are pretty good.
Overall, 2.5/5.
Fully agree with what you’re saying here, what is QT doing?
Look at Hayao Miyazaki as an example, the guy's "retired" so many times during the last 30 years, yet he always chooses to come back because he has an idea for a great film that he wants to make. And the results speak for themselves, even with his latest film The Boy and the Heron, he's clearly still capable of making amazing works of art. Can you imagine coming up with a story as brilliant and spellbinding as Spirited Away, and then choosing not to make it simply because of an arbitrary limit you've set yourself?
If Tarantino wants to retire from filmmaking because he wants to spend more time with his family, or because he feels like he's exhausted himself creatively, then more power to him. But I can't stop thinking that this whole 10-film limit is kind of silly, and is really restricting his creative capabilities rather than enhancing them
man you gotta see 4 rooms
it's got some hilarious parts in it
Had a lot of recommendations for it based off this video! I must do it
I don’t think anyone cares if he makes a couple bad films or not. He has nothing to prove. I doubt he’d make anything “bad” anyway. Really sucks we won’t get this film
I don’t think he should force himself to give up filmmaking if he’s still passionate about making more stuff, but by the same token I definitely like what Jerry Seinfeld said about leaving people wanting more too.
The trouble I am now having with Tarantino is I feel like he is now becoming a major cliche and parody of himself. What I would want from his final film is something so radically different as a you think this is all I could do here’s this. So I am talking Romantic Comedy or kids fantasy adventure movie or some other fantasy movie. Something that feels really different however while I’m sure he could do it i sometimes feel wonder if he wants to make something his fans like rather than something he has the ability to do
Nobody will be mad at him if he changes his mind and decides to do 15… or 18… or 20.
It’d be great if he developed the Star Trek idea into a mini series for TV. Maybe several of these other ideas could be developed for television…
I think he should simply stop when he feels like he has nothing more to say as an artist, it would be a shame for any creative person to let the flame in them die after making some arbitrary amount of projects. If he has a good idea for a movie he should go for it. With that being said I understand him not wanting to weaken his filmography by putting out something that doesn’t live up to the rest. Which is difficult as he’s made some of the greatest movies of all time. That’s a lot of pressure.
Eastwood arguably made his best films in his 70s and yes 80s. C'mon QT
10:30 well that explained a lot
😳
His part of four rooms is the best plus what about the Party or whatever it was called or maybe that was unreleased
Totally agreed… until you got to Scott, I do think he has revealed himself to be a right time, right place and the man to take on BR and Aliens, some could argue the merits of Gladiator (however I’d argue that was more script and actors), but as time has gone on he has ruined the idea that he is an all time great, the title wave on mediocre and frankly pop films has displaced his legacy and he should just step aside for other talent to emerge (had he done so we would have got Bloomkamps Aliens film.
I totally agree that Tarentino has got in his own head with this 10 number, and as much as I wanted the Res dogs/pulp fiction prequel The Vega Bros or a Trek film…. These are precisely the type of films that would have been what he wanted to avoid.
I do think only having one left in the chamber is the reason we didn’t get the movie critic and he is inorganically block himself… wouldn’t be surprised to see it turned into a limited series, and that is a shame, because it would feel like he would be part of the final nail in the coffin of cinema.
12 is a good alternative, it's a dozen. 13 als has a certain appeal, especially in relation to him.
To be fairr, Four Rooms is directed by 4 different people with 4 different parts. Rodriguez and Tarantinos parts were the most fun
Tarantino Movies Ranking IMO:
1. Pulp Fiction
2. Inglorious Basterds
3. Reservoir Dogs
4. Jackie Brown
5. Kill Bill Full Experience
6. Django Unchained
7. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
8. Hateful Eight
9. Death Proof
1. Inglorious
2. Kill Bill Vol 1
3. Pulp Fiction
4. Hateful Eight
5. Reservoir Dogs
6. Django
7. Kill Bill Vol 2
8. Death Proof
9. Once Upon A Time
10. Jackie Brown
I predict he will make exactly 11 movies.
Well check back in ten years
Im just interested in seeing the Movie Critic now bc I know I’m never gonna see it 🤷♂️
You must see Four Rooms
Tbf the Kill Bill movies should only have been one tbh, the dropoff in Vol.2 was very noticeable
Couldn’t he just direct TV shows instead? That way it doesn’t affect his film count.
Actually recommend Four Rooms lol
Putting the last duel in the same category as covenant is a sin. Covenant sucks.
Would wonder if he would work with Roger Avary again
We love telling our favorite artists to not stop making work because we love them… until the world forgets they have classic work, or their legacy is tainted because they put out so many misses after years of great work. I understand him wanting to stop. Do I think only 10 is silly? Yes. But he’s being safe, and I don’t blame him. It’s like how plenty of artists should’ve stopped making music years ago, still are, and are laughed at cause everything they do isn’t good anymore and they refuse to accept it. Don’t want that for Tarantino.
Plus... he already made a Stinker in Deathproof
He was promised STAR TREK 5. Not 4; five.
Multiple versions of 4 were being developed at once
Honestly, the 10 film thing that Tarantino has come up with is ridiculous.
His take that filmmakers get worse after they hit 60 is so strange, especially as he is now over 60... You never know, The Hateful Eight was cancelled when it leaked, but then he pushed through and made it. It's one of my least favourite of his films.
1. Pulp Fiction
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. Django Unchained
4. Jackie Brown
5. Once Upon A Time In Hollywood
Kill Bill is great but I think it falls apart with the Superman speech at the end of Vol. 2.
The Hateful Eight - very hard to re-watch due to the whole film being based around the mystery aspect is hard to invest in, once you know what happens. I also hated the QT voiceover in the middle as he talks directly to the audience, it adds nothing, The 70mm film looks great on the big screen, but at home it's awkwardly letterboxed on home releases. The r*** sequence goes on for way too long and serves very little purpose over the shock.
The best two things are the cinematography and the Ennio Morrocone score.
Reservoir Dogs is great, but it has aged, being his first film there are a few issues (not many).
Death Proof is overly long, could have made a banging 90min film. And all the girls just talk like Tarantino.
I don't want it to happen but im starting to feel QT is gonna die before his "tenth" film comes out
If he stopped directing. Then he would write books, write screenplays, why are yall so fixated on one thing?
okay, mr. "i'm retired at 60"!
I don't really have comments, but I want to boost engagement.
Four Rooms is just a short film that takes place alongside other short films which share the same setting and one character. It's not a feature, it absolutely doesn't count toward the 10.
It is a feature film. It’s an anthology
@@FullFatVideos An anthology that he only directed one aspect of. Anthologies are a collection of short films. Four Rooms is not a Tarantino film. It is a feature film that includes a short film he wrote and directed as part of it.