We Go Inside the Airbus Corporate Jets ACJ TwoTwenty A220-Based VIP Business Jet - BJT

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 16. 06. 2024
  • Up to 19 people can ride in comfort on the Airbus ACJ TwoTwenty aircraft, which is a VIP version of the latest member of the manufacturer’s airliner family, the A220. The aircraft can comfortably operate out of 5,000-foot-long runways at maximum takeoff weight and still carry you nonstop from L.A. to London or Beijing to Melbourne.
    The cabin is split into six zones to offer different environments for passengers, and also a rest area for the crew. When it comes to rest for the passengers, eleven people can comfortably sleep in real beds rather than just reclining seats.
    While the cruising speed is slightly slower compared to other long-range business jets at Mach .82, the TwoTwenty’s palatial VIP interior and twenty five percent less fuel burn are a considerable upside.
    ________________________________________________________________________
    Visit www.ainonline.com for all the latest on the aviation industry, and AIN sister site bjtonline.com for the most comprehensive resource available for anyone using-or interested in trying-private flight. Visit FutureFlight.aero for all the news on developing aviation technology.
    Subscribe to the daily AIN Alerts newsletter: www.ainonline.com/ain-alerts-...
    Subscribe to the FutureFlight newsletter: connect.ainonline.com/futuref...
    Subscribe to BJT Waypoints: www.bjtonline.com/subscribe
    Follow AIN on Instagram: / ain_online
    Like AIN on Facebook: / ainpublications
    Follow AIN on Twitter: / ainonline
    Follow AIN on LinkedIn: / aviationinternationalnews
    Follow FutureFlight on Instagram: / futureflightain
    Like FutureFlight on Facebook: / futureflightain
    Follow FutureFlight on Twitter: / futureflightain
    Follow FutureFlight on LinkedIn: / futureflight
    Follow BJT on Instagram: / bjtonline
    Like BJT on Facebook: / business.jet.traveler
    Follow BJT on Twitter: / bjtonline
    Follow BJT on Linkedin: / business-jet-traveler
    Aviation International News: www.ainonline.com
    Business Jet Traveler: www.bjtonline.com
    FutureFlight: futureflight.aero
    #aviation #luxury #travel

Komentáře • 90

  • @IAmTraceBeats
    @IAmTraceBeats Před 6 měsíci +69

    This is just right there, in my top 3 best private aircrafts.

    • @logic_bot3753
      @logic_bot3753 Před 6 měsíci +2

      What are the other two?

    • @IAmTraceBeats
      @IAmTraceBeats Před 6 měsíci

      @@logic_bot3753 Bombardier Global 7500 and the upcoming Dassault 10X.

    • @denziiey
      @denziiey Před 6 měsíci +3

      ​@logic_bot3753 probably the Gulfstream 750 and Global 7500

    • @ARTDEVGRU247
      @ARTDEVGRU247 Před 6 měsíci +1

      ​@@denziieyg700 you mean.

    • @denziiey
      @denziiey Před 6 měsíci +1

      @@ARTDEVGRU247 correct

  • @desertmodern7638
    @desertmodern7638 Před 6 měsíci +10

    By far the best ACJ TwoTwenty video I have seen.

  • @LMays-cu2hp
    @LMays-cu2hp Před 5 měsíci +6

    Thank you for sharing this beautiful aircraft.😊😊

  • @bradleynoble46
    @bradleynoble46 Před 6 měsíci +5

    What a great video, thank you

  • @stevensims8922
    @stevensims8922 Před 4 měsíci +8

    What I find particularly AMAZING is that the real deal looks exactly like the CGI mockups I've been looking at in the "configurator" for these past 2 years. I will say that it can look a little "IKEA", but I'm assuming their are leather options and other custom wood options in the design center at Comlux.

  • @michellabbe8517
    @michellabbe8517 Před 6 měsíci +47

    It all depends on what your missions are... Personally, I'll take a Global 8000 over this "airliner" and here's why... Although they claim a Mach 0.82 cruise speed, that is just marketing talking because that is its MMO and no one cruises an aircraft at MMO... I'd be very surprised if its "normal" cruise speed is even Mach 0.80, probably more like Mach 0.78 and then you need to know at which speed it achieves it so called maximum range of 5650 nautical miles, probably at Mach 0.76 or even less... A Global 8000 cruises at Mach 0.85 (typically) which is also the speed at which it gets its maximum range from or if you want to go faster, at Mach 0.90 (high speed cruise) or even at Mach 0.92 (super high speed cruise) and up to Mach 0.94 (its MMO). Typically owners will cruise at Mach 0.90 which is significantly faster than the A-220... The Global 8000's range of 8000 nautical miles a whopping 2350 nautical miles more than the A-220 and achieved at a much higher speed. Then there is the pressurization system... Although the A-220's cabin differential is higher than most other airliners, it is still not as high as the Global's differential which means the Global has a lower cabin altitude making long trips a lot more comfortable. Then there is the cruise altitude... The A-220 is certified to 41,000 feet where as the Global is certified to 51,000. This can make a huge difference when travelling westbound and the aircraft can climb above the winds, saving you time and money. Then there is accessibility to a kinds of smaller airports which generally a "real" business jet will have access to and not airliners that are modified into corporate versions because of weight and overall size.

    • @yaarn303
      @yaarn303 Před 5 měsíci +4

      I agree. This jet seems to be primarily marketed for the “look-at-me” factor vs functionality. Reasonably, a jet owner would need a second smaller jet for general use.

    • @DMSparky
      @DMSparky Před 5 měsíci +3

      Cool, guess what? None of us could afford either and anyone who could afford one could buy both if they wanted.

    • @stevensims8922
      @stevensims8922 Před 4 měsíci +1

      That must be why if you ordered today you wouldn't get it for 4 or more years, because they are already significantly back ordered by people that actually have the scratch to buy one. Sure it might take an extra half hour to get from NY to London, but let's be honest, a Global with 18 people onboard would feel like sardines in a can. (tight fit) where 18 px on a 220 is spread out. The ACJ is a Biz Jet meant for higher PAX capacity. If you just need to flit about with a couple of friends for a golf outing in Palm Springs, get a Citation. To each his own, both aircraft have their place. BTW I'd go for Dassault's new 10X or even the 6X before I messed around with Bombardier.

    • @hc8714
      @hc8714 Před 4 měsíci

      small entourage gets small plane.

    • @galactictomato1434
      @galactictomato1434 Před 3 měsíci

      ​@@stevensims8922Bombardier designed the A220 😂

  • @commandertopgun
    @commandertopgun Před 3 měsíci +1

    WOW FANTASTIC ENTERTAINING, & TRULY INFORMATIVE, I WILL BE CONSIDERING IT, THANKS FOR POSTING/SHARING AWESOME VIDEO REVIEW.

  • @naturallyherb
    @naturallyherb Před 6 měsíci +1

    Amazing!

  • @jesuslivesforeverthelordof5023
    @jesuslivesforeverthelordof5023 Před 5 měsíci +1

    This is amazing

  • @gunvaldsandhaland7757
    @gunvaldsandhaland7757 Před 6 měsíci

    Wow Great Air Craft

  • @danielhabte7847
    @danielhabte7847 Před 2 měsíci +2

    That is a beautiful bombardier c series

  • @LoveO-uk2qv
    @LoveO-uk2qv Před měsícem

    Beautiful ❤

  • @NaumRusomarov
    @NaumRusomarov Před 5 měsíci +2

    excellent. i'll take two.

  • @lawrence.centinales
    @lawrence.centinales Před 28 dny

    very nice

  • @williamdrijver4141
    @williamdrijver4141 Před 6 měsíci +9

    So much better than the small and cramped Bombardier / Gulfstream / Dassault products. And excellent value for money. Looks great too, way better than a BBJ.

    • @ARTDEVGRU247
      @ARTDEVGRU247 Před 6 měsíci +1

      Yea much slower too. People want speed

    • @sholky
      @sholky Před 6 měsíci +1

      How so? This is around Mach 0.82 cruising, a Gulfstream is usually Mach 0.85 to 0.9
      Not that big of a difference...

    • @singel09
      @singel09 Před 6 měsíci +1

      @@sholkyMMO …

    • @pistonburner6448
      @pistonburner6448 Před 3 měsíci

      Small and cramped? You can't fit to sit comfortably in a Bombardier / Dassault?

    • @galactictomato1434
      @galactictomato1434 Před 3 měsíci

      Funny because this is effectively a Bombardier

  • @michalbac2304
    @michalbac2304 Před 6 měsíci +6

    How about cabin pressurization. One important factor in private aviation is to have lower cabin altitude. The lower the better for passengers. Gulfstream has 3000ft cabin altitude in g700. how about this one ? I found unconfirmed info that this is below 6000ft which is significant higher than competition. Please can you comment on that ?

  • @Nicoleoliver294
    @Nicoleoliver294 Před 5 měsíci +2

    I'm interested in the ACJ. Some pointers are fly by wire joysticks, new styling with nice woods, also generally newer looking. Some things I would look at over BBJ737

    • @winwhitmire2387
      @winwhitmire2387 Před 5 měsíci +2

      As a A220 flight instructor, 1st...PLEASE don't refer to them as "joysticks". They are "side sticks"! At my company, we stress..."this ain't a toy plane". The physical size of the cabin is what makes this jet unique. The fuel burn, at an airline cruise speed (and you're correct...we don't cruise at MMO... BUT WE COULD!) is about 2800 lbs/hr which is phenomenal. That's why we can fly our jets from coast to coast with only 109/130 passengers (-100 or -300) and still make money. It's great for long haul/low density routes or off season. It's also very quiet. Unlike the BBJ, its weight footprint is much less and thus allows more runway availability and ramps. Of all the jets I've taught over 25 years, this little bugger is my all time favorite "flying girlfriend". For what it's worth, someone noted "cramped Bombardier". This aircraft is a clean sheet design originally called the Bombardier C-Series before Airbus bought the division.

  • @kmcc2355
    @kmcc2355 Před 6 měsíci +16

    Much better than a G7 or 7500

    • @brandonadams7837
      @brandonadams7837 Před 6 měsíci +5

      Larger yes. Better? Not in any relevant aircraft performance categories.

    • @briansoan9694
      @briansoan9694 Před 6 měsíci +1

      But cruising speed slower than G7, 7500 & 10x.

    • @TChalla007
      @TChalla007 Před 22 dny +1

      @@briansoan9694 SFO to Europe is doable. SFO to Singapore need a stop in Tokyo. First world problem of the top 1%

  • @sikukudotke
    @sikukudotke Před 4 měsíci +1

    Top 1

  • @nibarutaismail8737
    @nibarutaismail8737 Před 4 měsíci +2

    sorry for BBJ, this is really amazing n the price is better compare to BBJ or Golfstream

  • @rufuspipemos
    @rufuspipemos Před 5 měsíci +3

    This looks FAR better than the renderings. But for $70-90M, the max altitude is very poor (41,000ft), the cruising speed of mach .70 to .75 is slow, and the cabin altitude is higher than new $20M private jets. Not to mention you have to land at large airports and small ones are out of the question.

    • @stevensims8922
      @stevensims8922 Před 4 měsíci

      You assertion RE airports is incorrect. Further, let me see you put 18 people on your Phenom. Good luck with that.

    • @Majahanak
      @Majahanak Před 3 měsíci

      ​​@@stevensims8922 So can I land this plane at airports where only jets land?

    • @stevensims8922
      @stevensims8922 Před 3 měsíci

      the ACJ 220 needs 5000 ft to take of at MTOW sea level@@Majahanak

  • @saidbenomar2577
    @saidbenomar2577 Před 5 měsíci +2

    ❤❤

  • @saidbenomar2577
    @saidbenomar2577 Před 5 měsíci +1

    😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍

  • @AgataKaminska84
    @AgataKaminska84 Před 2 měsíci

    What is the range. I want to buy

  • @stradivarioushardhiantz5179
    @stradivarioushardhiantz5179 Před 6 měsíci +2

    1400m takeoff distance

  • @malicksangare7860
    @malicksangare7860 Před 5 měsíci

    I think this one is competing with the embraer lineage 1000e

  • @ourfarmhouseinspain
    @ourfarmhouseinspain Před měsícem

    Another poke in the eye for an increasingly aimless Boeing, isnt it ? This aircraft will do well, deservedly so.

  • @916medic
    @916medic Před 4 měsíci

    Ill take 3 please. You can just leave them on my porch. Thank you. I like how we are like hmm i would rather have a 737 bbj. Like any of us can afford to fly in one of these. I am working hard to one day be able to fly in one.

  • @Unuthryear
    @Unuthryear Před 4 měsíci

    I'd add 2nd guest lav

  • @flopidrone8824
    @flopidrone8824 Před 2 měsíci +1

    les gars reprenez les vidéos sil vous plait

  • @KyIieMinogue
    @KyIieMinogue Před 5 měsíci +1

    There’s a reason there is this specific gap in the private jet market. There is a reason why for decades private business jets have remained relatively small…

    • @galactictomato1434
      @galactictomato1434 Před 3 měsíci

      Private business jets have been getting bigger and bigger. What are you talking about.

  • @Burbs1976
    @Burbs1976 Před 2 měsíci

    Imagine having the cash for this!

  • @khangoats9576
    @khangoats9576 Před 4 měsíci

    Duniya ki jannat

  • @freedomforever6718
    @freedomforever6718 Před 6 měsíci +3

    For the rich guy on a budget.

  • @ruffnutz71
    @ruffnutz71 Před 6 měsíci +2

    It would be a hard sell over the 10X or Gulfstream considering the purchase prices are so similar ....It has less range , slower cruise speed , lower flight level and less cabin pressure All in exchange for more room and slightly lower running costs. So you can arrive later and less refreshed if you buy the 220 , not much of a sales pitch.

    • @stevensims8922
      @stevensims8922 Před 4 měsíci

      The 10X won't be available for a few more years, but you are right it's a sportier option for up to 8 pax. Once you start getting North of 10 pax though, the ACJ is going to have it's charms.

    • @ruffnutz71
      @ruffnutz71 Před 4 měsíci

      True , the 10X is a ways off but the major down side of the 220 is it gives up the "marketable" benefits of the smaller Gulfstream size jets ( speed , distance , altitude , cabin pressure) AND it also gives up some internal volume on the BBj's and ACJ's , its just a big compromise with no practical advantage unless the buyers want to lose time and volume.
      @@stevensims8922

  • @David73694
    @David73694 Před 4 měsíci +1

    Nice aircraft but the nautical miles doesn’t make sense. Its too low. Should’ve been 7500 atleast so you can travel the world nonstop

  • @brent2438
    @brent2438 Před 4 měsíci +1

    2000 nm less range then the G700

  • @gamaeriawan
    @gamaeriawan Před 2 měsíci

    ACJ 220 match the demand of private jet by Airbus Corp.

  • @grahamhall3165
    @grahamhall3165 Před 6 měsíci

    If this aircraft is meant to operate out of smaller airfeilds why no airstair ???

    • @denziiey
      @denziiey Před 6 měsíci

      A220 doesn't have that design. Considering the structural changes it probably wouldn't be feasible to see this reach market by 2025 which is when this one intended

    • @stevensims8922
      @stevensims8922 Před 4 měsíci +2

      The ACJ does have the option for airstairs, no worries.

  • @Oakley2097
    @Oakley2097 Před 6 měsíci +1

    A Nespresso ? Really, cash for a decent plane but ick for coffee. Airbus can't really have that as an option

    • @stevensims8922
      @stevensims8922 Před 4 měsíci +2

      Coffee maker supplied by owner not Airbus. You can bring what ever machine you'd like onboard and you don't even have to get it FAA certified at the cost of $500k. (see how that works)

  • @alexmaclean1
    @alexmaclean1 Před 5 měsíci +2

    I'm just glad that the carbon tax I'm paying on the 400 liters of fuel I need per year will protect the planet from a few of these things lol

  • @lmc333
    @lmc333 Před 5 měsíci +1

    He or She

  • @robertdeyoung293
    @robertdeyoung293 Před 4 měsíci +1

    My Filipina and I are looking to sell for Global 7500 I'm trying to find a Boeing 787 ER and have my Filipina build it the way she wants Gulfstream end Bombardier 7500 I am just sick and tired going into Kodiak are refueling in Japan you can never go Direct touchdown refuel immigration you will always piss away 45 minutes to an hour and 20 minutes to wait to read text so I'm hoping to find a 787 hopefully the next month or two

  • @ght33
    @ght33 Před 6 měsíci +6

    Selling a jet worth Millions and he refers to the boss as a man. Not living up to the Airbus Standard.

    • @jeffh3384
      @jeffh3384 Před 5 měsíci

      There you are. Only took time to find you busy body, touch grass.

  • @user-ue6zx2do2f
    @user-ue6zx2do2f Před 6 měsíci +3

    Peek Capitalism.
    Anyone, who rides this should be taken to court for emitting to much Co2.
    Fly first class if you really need to.

    • @conorcorrigan765
      @conorcorrigan765 Před 6 měsíci

      lol sorry but the elite have already decided that it’s the peasants flying easyjet and Ryanair who are the real climate criminals. Have you ever seen what the airport looks like anytime there’s a climate summit? Private jets parked nose to tail as far as the eye can see.

    • @tobiasmackenzie4332
      @tobiasmackenzie4332 Před 6 měsíci +8

      You realise people who own private jets carbon offset x10 for everything they do. So not only do they have a better carbon output than you do. But they also contribute more positively to the environment :)

    • @conorcorrigan765
      @conorcorrigan765 Před 6 měsíci +1

      @@tobiasmackenzie4332 I didn't realize that, actually. Probably because it's not true.
      But the fact that you've actually been convinced that people who own Superyachts and Gulfstreams actually emit less carbon than the average middle class family who drive a Toyota and go on vacation to Mexico every five years really just does go to show people will believe literally anything.

    • @87solarsky
      @87solarsky Před 6 měsíci

      CO2 is plant food. End of the B.S.

    • @brynleytalbot778
      @brynleytalbot778 Před 6 měsíci +2

      So fly an outdated fuel guzzler owned by the airlines, who are pushing it to the maximum, or this efficient one. Sour grapes indicate what we all see as progressive, that airlines are losing first class to private charter, and those seats subsidise cheap ones, so the days of cheap holidays and weekend getaways may be nearing their end, meaning less airlines, less polluting old fleets, and an environmental win.