On Modal Collapse and the Traditional Thomists (clip)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 17. 09. 2023
  • Thank you for supporting Scholastic Answers
    On Modal Collapse and the Traditional Thomists
    Watch the full stream here: • Saturday Morning Show ...
    Click the join button above to get all your livestream questions answered.
    NEW AQUINAS ACADEMY
    Link: www.christianbwagner.com/newa...
    Discord: aquinas.cc/la/en/~DePrinNat.C1
    Donate: / newaquinasacademy
    FURTHER RESOURCES
    To get Tutoring: www.christianbwagner.com/book...
    Annotated Thomist: www.christianbwagner.com/anno...
    Scholastic Courses: www.christianbwagner.com/courses
    SPONSOR
    Use the code “Militant” for 20% off to learn Greek here: fluentgreeknt.com/
    MUSIC
    • Song of Kings - Clamav...
    • Solemn Mass in Thanksg...
    SUPPORT
    Subscribe: / @militantthomist
    Become a Patron: / militantthomist
    Donate: www.paypal.com/donate/?busine...
    SusbscribeStar: www.subscribestar.com/militan...
    FOLLOW
    Website: www.christianbwagner.com/
    Facebook: / militantthomist
    Facebook Group: / 543689120339579
    Twitter: / militantthomist
    Instagram: / militantthomist
    WATCH
    / @militantthomist
    LISTEN
    Podcast: www.christianbwagner.com/podcast
    Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/0exZN1v...
    Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Anchor: anchor.fm/militantthomist
    SHOP
    Book Store: www.christianbwagner.com/shop
    Merch: www.christianbwagner.com/merch
  • Zábava

Komentáře • 4

  • @InternetCrusader-rb7ls
    @InternetCrusader-rb7ls Před 10 měsíci +3

    Great video that really helped me.

  • @catholicusmaan
    @catholicusmaan Před 9 měsíci +4

    1) Necessarily (if S knows that p, then p)
    it does not follow that
    2) If S knows that p, then necessarily p.
    To think otherwise is to commit the modal fallacy of confusing the necessity of the consequence, no?

    • @dubbelkastrull
      @dubbelkastrull Před 5 měsíci +3

      This is the argument:
      P1: God's will is unchanging and necessary (since it is identical to His unchanging necessary essence).
      P2: What God wills is determined by the way God's will *is.*
      P3: Creation exists because God wills it to exist, and it cannot exist unless God wills it.
      P4: By virtue of the will being unchanging and eternally the same, God has unchangeingly willed that creation should exist from all eternity.
      P5: Whatever God unchangeingly wills from all eternity is necessarily going to occur (i.e. it is unavoidable).
      Conclusion: Creation was necessarily going to occur unavoidably because God has unchangeingly willed it from all eternity to do so.

    • @gabrielteo3636
      @gabrielteo3636 Před 3 měsíci

      @@dubbelkastrull C2 This universe is necessary the way it is. Everything in this universe is necessary and could not have been another way. Run the exact same argument for everything in this universe and you will get everything is necessary and could not have been another way.