Russia is the King of projection and whatboutism to the point where it practically invented those concepts in propaganda and politics. Nothing has changed, they just sought a new audience with their same old propaganda.
@@Dookieman1975 the people, not the government, you cant call a country "victim", because the victims are always the people, the government is the one that makes decisions, and then suffers then concequences
@@Dookieman1975 the citizens are the victims, many citizens want to leave or surrender, Ukrainian leaders are forcing them to fight or die, and Russia tells them to surrender or die.
This is NOT "Anti-Western Propaganda". It's a message against capitalists, weapon manufacturers and nazism/fascism. The Soviets were based producing this clip.
No, it’s propaganda. The message is that Capitalism produces a war machine and fascism, when in reality both Capitalist and Communist countries were capable of warmongering and producing giant military machines. The idea that Capitalism is the only source of war is pure Soviet nonsense.
WEF/globalism/capitalism is what is in the heart of the west today, military, morally, culturally, so it's not wrong. It's indeed anti-western to root against Israel for instance. The west prove again and again that it can only generates more of the same colonialist/capitalist; in short - anti-human pattern, masked as "free choice" and "freedom". Not saying the USSR was not a hypocriticy, but at least it had the guts to end it's own existence when it didn't live up to it's own social standards and promises. Meaning, that in the end - they were more true to the democratic idea than the western hypocrites.
@@unaincreibleroca3427 Its interesting that you read his comment it as understood it as him equating anti-fascism with being anti-westeren. Where I read it as him pointing out other people equate anti-fascism with being anti-westeren.
@@louwritznel3816 ah, perhaps, I'm not sure I just saw that a lot of the comments were heavily left leaning and because I was in a rush I didn't think much of it
More like ironic given Russia's actions in East Germany, Korea, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Africa, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Georgia, and Ukraine while it was pushing this propaganda.
It's even funnier when you consider the USSR was the main exporter of oil and gas to Germany right to the beginning of Operation Barbarossa. And even afterwards, the majority of equipment most third world dictatorships and tyrants use Soviet made weaponry.
@@TheFi0r3 funny how you never learn about the USSR's foreign misadventures/atrocities during the Cold War in school, where its just "Muh Vietnam" and "Muh Operation Condor"
It's like when you explain to people why they aren't getting paid enough and they start agreeing with you, and then if you mention the word 'communism' they start burning you into a stake
@@gtcross4512 I understand like this. The elites of the west feeds it's newborn children (common citizens) with money and lots of propaganda spreading hatred with false information.they also supply their vessels with money and weapon to wage war with various county and nobody is safe. West killed Chinese in the civil war, Japanese in atomic bo"bing, created Taliban, destroyed Yemen Vietnam Lebanon and now Palestine. That's it . Summerization of west activity in one video.
@@Mautiks youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture
It was the different women running with their babies that I realized what the message was supposed to be. Both sides fight, at the same time actually helping each other to create a war machine, a monster that will lay waste to the rest of the world. Meanwhile, there are many calls for peace, but while those birds are numerous, they aren’t anywhere near the strength and size of the monstrous bird. They at best create a nuisance.
This is just a part of the cartoon ..... The message is captalism creats monsters and the world suffers ... only way out is communism ... ... Witch is very hypocritical considering it was the ussr that aided ns germany for the most time ....
If this had been made in the United States back then, there's no way it would have included a black or Asian mother and baby. "Propaganda"? I think the US propaganda is far worse
@@ureyesrbleeding1 so what??? You can say "I like [X] film" and they could respond "That's literally what it was meant for". What is wrong with you people.
From what i know it isnt really that bad as western propaganda says, you werent starving (during tbe 1970s), nor was it the utopia soviet propaganda says it was.
@@stagirit384fr agent orange protected south vietnam america on its way to save south vietnam by entering their country for 20 years, bombing everything and then just leaving forcing them to surrender
So just because the title has "anti-Western" and "Soviet" all of a suddenly people's critical thinking goes out the window and they can't see that it's a very factual and poignant criticism of Western powers and capitalism that should be taken seriously.
@@5678efgh3 America is the most important, superior and prosperous continent. It is the new center, therefore the new benchmark. Henceforth the "West" is Asia and the "East" is Europe. 😤👊💪
It was multiple countries that made up the former Soviet Union and not all of those countries spoke the same language, it's pretty ingenious to have such a message able to go out to each individual Soviet state and no matter the language you'd understand what was being conveyed to you.
No, all Soviet countries spoke Russian. Especially when this cartoon came out it would have been decades upon decades since the standardization of the Russian languages. In fact still most post Soviet countries have a near 40-50% Russian speaking population
Several weeks into this scenario: This just in, an incredibly large eagle with explosive feathers has consumed the USS Gerald R Ford. Scientists speculate that it might be the same species of bird as the one that raided the nuclear storage plant in Albuquerque and ate every last nuclear warhead last week. This bird knows no borders, and is in constant hunger. It is unclear why it only feeds on military supplies, but we advise all personal in any military service to be weary of these behemoths
Уровень Советской пропаганды был очень высоким. Там работали лучшие художники, поэты, режиссеры и другие. Но я сомневаюсь, что этот мультфильм снят в СССР
This is an incredibly fascinating cartoon, I’ve been scouring for more info on it with every search term under the sun to no avail. If anyone has a full version or a name for this, please let me know, I’m dying for more info
@@jorgedeanoperez2997 there were a lot of masterpieces of human creativity and spirit made. After watching this i can only think about this one, it's anti war too. czcams.com/video/4oxP3TyuQx0/video.html
Суть в том, что фашистские организации активно развивались благодаря буржуазии, о том и речь. Фильм против фашистских идей. Поскриптум: паны и панночки, люди и собаки, либералы и социалисты, националисты и буржуазы, не надо устраивать политсрачей пожалуйста. Все люди когда-то ошибаются, даже лидеры стран, НО это не повод для того, чтобы писать гадости и глупости в сторону других людей. Будьте добрее ;)
@@conserva-chan2735 stereotype, and propaganda. Man, learn to identify information, lol. I think you're 2 years old. This is anti-fascist ksta propaganda.
The fact it potrays a few different cultures and people as the innocent woman and child seems quite good in a sense that it can come off as everyone feels the addects of war and we should worry. Just a quick bit i noticed. I cant add more.
those were eastern cultures behind the iron wall. the big black bird represented the rebuild of germany by the US and Britain after the war... russia saw itself as the super power defending the east from that rebuild... they were selling fear... after all they tried to treaty once with Hitler's Germany and due to it they suffered millions of lost lives... after all the decendents of the people who put hitler in power were shown to be vengeful in the past ww1 for reference... So russia to promote their ideology to the masses of the east they had to visually show how the US and Britain were creating a new larger Threat that they might not be able to hold back... in the west we didnt understand this because we never wanted to invade russia... and we were making germany back then an anti war country much the same way Japan became... But in order for russia to motivate its people and justify the sacrifice of giving their lives and hard work to the state to make it strong enough to defend itself from an attack that was to never arrive... but it was all a lie to their people... since russia only wanted to take as much of europe as they could for world power.. and that is where Putin is today in his head... desperately trying to rebuild a weakened Russia to the Strength it had become after ww2... but those satelite states do not want to live under the oppression of Russias ideology anymore because having done so following the war only brought them hardship... plus since 1991 alot of those satelite states got to experience western capitalism and the wealth it brought to them... it hasnt been as great as it could... but it has been better than it was under russian rule. and that is why Ukraine fights so hard now... 30 yrs of freedom has strengthened them and given them reason to fight for true democracy and freedom... which russia despises because it takes money and power away from them and they fear those smaller countries working together because they were treated so poorly during the cold war and fear it will eventually cost them their country...
The stereotypical 'women' and the addition of 'and children' to keep women in a protected strata and pretense of 'she' does no wrong - just pushing on simps instincts.
the original cartoon is called We can do it (Это в наших силах), 1970 and it lasts around 10 minutes. The actual meaning of it is actually opposite - people from all around the world, including Europe, Asia, USSR etc fought together against fascism. So don’t believe everything you see on the Internet 😊
@@ecydysis Here’s some news for ya: Napalm and palm trees were also present in Kenya in the 1950 as the British were bombing the independence movement in civilian villages.
@@x2y3a1j5 The film was presumably made in the 70s while The Vietnam War was still going so it was likely alluding to that conflict than anything else. Nonetheless the British are still regarded as ‘Western’ so my point still stands.
@@ecydysis Yes, you’re right; however I’m intent on spreading awareness about that scarcely known fact about the Brits being the 1st to use napalm against civilians. Both our points stand and I think we understand each other, despite some lack of clarity or manners on my part. Have a good day!
Im interested in how old this is, because the arguments used in it is still used today, so it kinda brings into perspective that the debate doesn't really change that much
@@Leviathan399 theres actually truth in this cartoon, i don't see a defense of communism here, but a critiique of powerful elites and military complex feeding wars. The black bird could be used as an analogy to conflict.
As so many people seem to be misunderstanding what the meaning of this animation is supposed to be here a clarification: The bird is supposed to represent the german eagle, which you can recognize by its pointy feathers as well as the cracks on the egg at the beginning which form a Swastika. The fat man and the man in uniform represent the western capitalists and generals, who invested a lot of money into the german economy after WWII through the marshall plan and stationed missiles and other military equipment there, after inviting them into NATO. This animation basically insinuates that the westerners were helping Germany regain power, thus potentially causing them to get out of control and create a new global conflict, which would be more destructive than ever before. I personally don't think the people who made this wanted to emphasize the importance of world peace. They were rather accusing the west of financing fascists to support them against the USSR. Thus making the Sowjet political system seem supperior and sane when compared to the Western one.
Lmao, nato before Ww2? Man read a book, again, none of your kids know the meaning of this video, you are too stupid and apply your 2000s mentality into this, talking about peace and globalism
Edited: I now know why people warn about the things written in their comment sections, but I genuinely didn't before. If you want to dive deeper, prepare yourself for some nasty little comments under an otherwise so beautiful animation video.
@@timd6303there is a mote of truth to western businesses assisting in the buildup of nazi Germanys forces, many nations officials turned blind eyes to the unusually high steel demands from german "tractor factories" because exports helped ease the pains of the great depression, but it's a huge stretch to say thats a bigger factor than literally signing a pact with them.
Socialism---a community working together for a common cause. Capitalism--making profits at any cost,health care,funerals,housing, war,arms sales,education utilities etc Communism--the state owns and operates everything
Socialism - State takes 50%+ income tax then pays for things for you and gives you access. Hopefully it's trustworthy. Communism - The state owns all businesses. Without a market economy, it inevitably fails to guess profitable prices and goes bankrupt. "Capitalism" - State manages security and uses minimal necessary force to manage domestic businesses (ie regulations and trustbusting). People manage their own money and procure for themselves. This harnesses opportunity maximally since any given citizen has the freedom to fill economic gaps themselves and extra capital to help them do it. Naturally, such societies end up wealthier and more plentiful.
The fundamental philosophical divide here lies in whether or not you believe people are better at living their own lives and improving their local environment than a team of experts is at mandating the best way of life and improving any given home environment. "Capitalism" (Laissez faire) says: empower the locals, they know their own situation best. "Communism" (A version of authoritarianism): The talent at the capital knows better than any local. And socialism is more on the authoritarian side of things.
Also you ascribe monolithic consciousness to capitalistic societies, when in reality it's a situation where every opportunity to make profit is free to be pursued. Individuals go for what they see and want individually. If something is unethical there are often organic repercussions and/or government intervention. The key to the government intervention, ideally, being minimal necessary force and leaving maximal acceptable agency to future citizens to pursue helpful opportunities for both themselves and their community and even that same government itself.
@Евгений СССР especially their Soviet era weapons and ration packs. Not to mention the nonexistence helmets and gear they have to source from home. The great bear we were all afraid of during the cold war has been shown to be nothing but a tattered old teddy bear. Poor Russian people. You've gone from a super power to a super joke. And now P*tin has turned you into a third world country now.
Actually this is pretty accurate Also the fact that the Soviet drew humans from multiple backgrounds in a very respectful way compared to the west which drew them in stereotype style in the same era , it took the west more years to fix thier drawing style lol Edit : Lol I've never thought this dumb comment will cause all the chaos in the replies section chill out guys also thanks for everyone who gave likes
I think that Soviet Union was as racist as west in some causes even worse. I mean destroying cultures and languages and of nations that was ruled by literal Russian Empire (but with different label) and makes everything in Russian language forcing this nations to learn it. Torturing them with made up Hunger-Genocide causing deaths of millions.
One of their best albums “another thing coming” is one of my favs and “Electric eye” I always imagined that bird was supposed to be the “electric eye” surveillance state/war machine bird.
@@StalinaNaVasNet. I understand and agree with you, but the term is loaded in the west to mean "official state narrative of country the US doesn't like
Let's hope the bird is not NATO as well. After all, NATO is only defensive alliance, right guys? NATO members was never involved in Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Iraq and so on. We are 1000% the good guys.
What a good inclusivity example for the time, although a white woman and her baby are the protagonists that sequence in which they replace her with versions of other races/ethnicities puts all those others in the same place and on the same level. And that done only with an animation sequence of a few seconds, and already with that they are transmitting the idea that "all races and cultures are in the same place, they are the same" without having to oversaturate.
@Chunkopops “Few countries as hatful as ours” I can name five off the top of my head and can name more if you give me a minute to think. C’mon, the US isn’t that bad, to say we are the most hateful or worst country is such an ignorant thing to say. The fact you say that leads me to think your from a country with those privileges provided in the US or similar, because only in those places can you have the time to complain and hate on a place that thousands of people would be willing to give away their life savings to live in, because it’s infinitely better then what they currently live with. Count your blessings and don’t take them for granted.
@Chunkopops no offense but you seem incredibly ignorant of the crimes that the soviet union comitted against their own population. I implore you to read up on what the soviets were doing; all in the name of communism but they were basically acting as fascists too.The usa isn't even comparable. For example because of soviet policies millions of kazakhs and ukrainians died in what can almost be counted as a genocide. Not to mention they deported alot of minorities to backwater parts of the country where they were forced to stay. Ethnic minorities in the soviet union had it just as bad if not worse which is why all the republics wanted to split from the soviet union in 1991.
@@hazzmati no offense but you seem extremely ignorant of what this guy was saying. He isn’t offering an excuse for war crimes or a reductive “the USSR was actually good” statement, just the fact that the west’s reductive, regressive view of Eastern Europe are not only untrue, but ironic remnants from Cold War propaganda still being pedaled in the US today
@Chunkopops American racism WAS on another level, racism is still prevalent today, but the media blows it, like most things, out of proportion distorting the people's views. People prey upon America's racist past for "helpful causes" when in reality all they are doing are helping themselves become rich by profiting off of racism. All they do is spread hate, America is not as racist as so many people say it is, but because the news cant bother to show anything but negativity and make everything about race, America is given a bad rap. White people are affected by police brutality as well as black people, but nobody talks about it. It's not about race, it's about abusing power
@@Shiny101 Most of the still-existing German companies don't really want to talk about what they did back then, as capitalism actually fed the Nazis and made them bigger. Fascism was a great way for corruption to make yourself even more money. Propaganda doesn't always state lies, what's being shown here isn't even that inaccurate. Capitalism has enough flaws, stop white knighting it wherever you can, or you will be the one falling for decades-old propaganda..
In 1933 Germany was the poorest country in Europe and could not even feed its own population and you want to say that by 1939 they were already able to finance the largest war in history and the most expensive military projects that could be? Ahaha. Hitler spared the British troops in Dunkirk and let them leave, then asked the West for peace, but Churchill did not agree to peace without conditions, the conditions of peace were the invasion of Russia. Hitler failed to invade Russia and was written off. Anglosaxons did not release many high-ranking Nazis from prison until they died, because they were afraid that the world would find out the truth.
Really makes you question if the American British or other at the time big countries supported the natzis and then tried to turn against it as America supported Taliban in war against Russia and then turned against it. Supported ISIS and then turned against it
The bad guys won WW2. The same cartoon is as valid as it was back in the day. The politicians still get rich with bribes from the war conglomerates. And the constant wars they start make sure there will always be clients. Meanwhile, civilians all over the world are condemned to certain death. Today's black bird is Al Qaeda.
The bird represents nazism and fascism, and the point of the film is that the western warmongers and capitalists “fed” nazism until it got big enough to challenge them and then it got out of hand. The moral of the story is that fascism (and by extension, war and destruction) doesn’t come out of thin air, it is fostered and cultivated by the rich and powerful and the people’s willingness to accept the system that allows fascism to grow.
The bird represents Germany. Germany's symbol is a black eagle and has been since the days of the Holy Roman Empire. So what they're saying is that from naziism a new Germany is born and the west feeds/arms that new Germany until it once again becomes a problem for Europe.
what are you talking about? the usa/capitalism never supported the nazis? the nazis were underdogs who seized control because the people hated communist influence in germany.
It is propaganda to act like the Nazis were funded by the evil West while the Soviets had nothing to do with supporting them. In 1922 the Soviets signed the Treaty of Rapallo with the Nazis, part of which allowed the Nazis to set up factories on Soviet territory to build up their mechanised forced, like tanks and artillery, beyond the limits that had been put on them during the Treaty of Versaille. In other words, the British and French were preventing the Germans from building up their army, but the Soviets gave them a back door to go around these restrictions. Unlike the Soviets, the US and the UK had no such deals which directly helped the Germans build up their military, although there were some loans made to them by financial institutions, these were relatively small in the grand scheme of things. The Dawes Plan involved giving loans to the Germans, but it was signed before the Nazis took power. Most financial aid quickly ended once Hitler rose to power. However, some Some private companies from the UK and US, like IBM, did get up to some unforgiveable stuff which helped the Nazis do terrible things, don't get me wrong. That's why it's nuanced. But on a governmental level, the Soviet government was much more direct in helpnig the Nazis build their war machine. Later, they signed a whole deal with Germany to divide and conquer Europe together, starting by taking different sides of Poland at the same time, triggering World War 2. Yes, you can say quite a bit about some bad decisions made by the capitalist countries, but the Soviets acting like they were not massively complicit is laughable.
Which is exactly the opposite of what happened. The Soviet Union was allied with Nazi Germany, while the evil, evil capitalists were fighting the Nazis. The Soviet Union were on the side of the Nazis up until the Nazis turned on them. Then the evil, evil capitalists saved their butts. WW2 is a story of capitalists destrying fascism and communists getting lucky and getting to exploit and tyrannize people for a couple of decades more.
@@redaug4212 Yes, the US intervened in the Russian civil war alongside the better part of the globe, trying to choke the revolution in its cradle, but they failed spectacularly. Not many know of this intervention.
@@ComradeHellas Not only that, but while the US military was deploying troops to the Soviet Union, western corporations like Ford Motor Company, Hercules Gear, and IBM, with the help of federal subsidization, were signing trade deals with Soviet leaders. The best enemy money can buy, as the saying goes.
@@ComradeHellas Not many know? The white army had huge support from the west, and it is well documented. Most high schools in western europe teach that to their students. Where do you get that information ("not many know of this intervention") from ?!
we should push all tax money into creating such bird with genetic engineering, And then feed it with tanks, guns, bombs and taxes to make it big and strong
@@dibershai6009 Chickens (by biology) is an Dinosaur, except very small. They are birbs, who focuses more on quantity vs quality. I have no idea how they think it's alright but ehh whatever
@@luigimrlgaming9484 armenian, lev atamanov. he has lots of masterpieces. hayao miyazaki told in an interview that atamanov's film "snow queen" has been a major influence and his favourite film. (i was personally very scared of that film as a child)
@@ammonite400 oh yeah they were my man but my expect you to know anything because you know internet and all that really hard to like find stuff out notoriously on the internet. Read a history book
1 - wrong or misunderstood title. 2 - Very artistic and smart animation that represents the truth. 3 - the title might be accurate now since NATO and USA are doing exactly that...
When an old soviet propaganda cartoon depicts a more truthful and accurate representation of recent global history and politics than contemporary western news media and commentary
It is propaganda to act like the Nazis were funded by the evil West while the Soviets had nothing to do with supporting them. In 1922 the Soviets signed the Treaty of Rapallo with the Nazis, part of which allowed the Nazis to set up factories on Soviet territory to build up their mechanised forced, like tanks and artillery, beyond the limits that had been put on them during the Treaty of Versaille. In other words, the British and French were preventing the Germans from building up their army, but the Soviets gave them a back door to go around these restrictions. Unlike the Soviets, the US and the UK had no such deals which directly helped the Germans build up their military, although there were some loans made to them by financial institutions, these were relatively small in the grand scheme of things. The Dawes Plan involved giving loans to the Germans, but it was signed before the Nazis took power. Most financial aid quickly ended once Hitler rose to power. However, some Some private companies from the UK and US, like IBM, did get up to some unforgiveable stuff which helped the Nazis do terrible things, don't get me wrong. That's why it's nuanced. But on a governmental level, the Soviet government was much more direct in helpnig the Nazis build their war machine. Later, they signed a whole deal with Germany to divide and conquer Europe together, starting by taking different sides of Poland at the same time, triggering World War 2. Yes, you can say quite a bit about some bad decisions made by the capitalist countries, but the Soviets acting like they were not massively complicit is laughable.
This is about how capitalists funded the nazis in the 40's and it was made in 1970, so I wouldnt say they predicted anything, even if capitalists still fund nazis nowadays lol
@@greyngreyer5 lmaoooo you're a dumbass, ofc WW1 wasn't a black and white affair, the allies are FAR from being saints, same for the average soldier everywhere else, google soldiers in Vietnam.
The Soviet and Allies' plan to destroy Germany worked. Germany is a puppet-state of America (like the rest of NATO), there is no cultural pride, and the Germans will become a minority in their own country.
@@enemyoftheworkingclass7557 Well yes, because at the end of the day they did remain neutral to fascism. It was more beneficial for them to turn a blind eye and let it continue happening. Fascism was targeting those who were critical of the institutional power they held. But I'm assuming that you were already aware of that because of your username.
No, it isn't. It is propaganda to act like the Nazis were funded by the evil West while the Soviets had nothing to do with supporting them. In 1922 the Soviets signed the Treaty of Rapallo with the Nazis, part of which allowed the Nazis to set up factories on Soviet territory to build up their mechanised forced, like tanks and artillery, beyond the limits that had been put on them during the Treaty of Versaille. In other words, the British and French were preventing the Germans from building up their army, but the Soviets gave them a back door to go around these restrictions. Unlike the Soviets, the US and the UK had no such deals which directly helped the Germans build up their military, although there were some loans made to them by financial institutions, these were relatively small in the grand scheme of things. The Dawes Plan involved giving loans to the Germans, but it was signed before the Nazis took power. Most financial aid quickly ended once Hitler rose to power. However, some Some private companies from the UK and US, like IBM, did get up to some unforgiveable stuff which helped the Nazis do terrible things, don't get me wrong. That's why it's nuanced. But on a governmental level, the Soviet government was much more direct in helpnig the Nazis build their war machine. Later, they signed a whole deal with Germany to divide and conquer Europe together, starting by taking different sides of Poland at the same time, triggering World War 2. Yes, you can say quite a bit about some bad decisions made by the capitalist countries, but the Soviets acting like they were not massively complicit is laughable.
Мораль в том, что всегда найдутся люди, которые своими деньгами и оружием для достижения своих алчных целей (желанием завладеть чужими богатством, ресурсами) будут взращивать амбициозных юнцов и управлять ими. Задача всех людей не допускать расцвета нацистских идей в обществе. Все люди равны в своём праве на счастливую жизнь.
@@reneablackheart9563 This is saying we fund fascists, and that's why we must be opposed. The whole "we won The Great Patriotic War all by ourselves against the fascists and their Western allies" shtick is huge in Russia.
@@liesdamnlies3372 You make it sound as if you didn't fund Al-Qaeda. You are the bad guys. You financed wars of brother against brother, and then come to pick up the pieces. You printed torture manuals and spread them on Latinamerica. You are the enemies of the world, not just the russians and the many other cultures that today live under the russian flag.
@@korosuke1788 Ah yes, the "America did bad things therefore Russia is good and cannot do bad things" argument. Look, copypasta from the Kremlin isn't going to get you very far with anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together. Try harder. I'm getting really bored with people like you who are so lazy with their propaganda.
Honestly at this point and how many people in the comments are saying its from another different side of the argument, imma just accept Its anti war, no matter who really made it.
The thing is, both sides, West and Soviet sphere, each made some valid critiques in their propaganda about their opponent. Just because a source is obviously biased doesn'r mean that they don't sometimes tell the truth. Of course, propaganda is both simplified and exaggerated for effect.
The USSR's bogeyman was Nazism. The USA's bogeyman was the USSR. It was easy to criticise the Nazis. They had lost the war, and everyone knew what they had done. The USA's criticism of the USSR was based in projection. Expensive, pointless projects were funded with the sole justification of "the Russians might already have done it." Among the Operation Stargate (attempting to use clairvoyance for espionage) and Project MK Ultra (using torture to create unwitting sleeper agents). It had nothing to do with the actual shortcomings of the USSR, which were actually talked about by actual Communists and Anarchists (Trotsky, Orwell, Goldman, and others) until the House Committee on Un-American Activities made being a Communist or Communist sympathiser illegal in the USA.
@@ottodidakt3069 Ironically, the USSR was accused of and criticised by the USA for crimes the USSR did not even commit, instead of the ones it did. It turns out that the crimes the USA accused the USSR of were ones the USA were guilty of themselves.
1941-1945: "This man is your FRIEND, he fights for FREEDOM", "Red Army together with the armies of our Allies will break the spine of the Fascist beast", "On our side RUSSIA, with us all the way!" 1945-now:
Soviet Scientist Yuri Bezmenov said that all ideologies are simply a mechanism for controlling the masses. The real world operates on power structures, nothing more.
Союзники во время войны называли социализм "альтернативной/левой/органической демократией" в своей пропаганде.В рамках курса на дружбу с СССР и предотвращения Оси"Белин-Москва" также не было никаких претензий из-за Польши,Прибалтики или Финляндии.Они даже продвигали культ личности Сталина в своих СМИ.Лол😆
Somehow the USSR forgot who supplied oil to Nazi Germany, who helped train Nazi soldiers, who shook hands with Nazi Germany when they divided Poland, somehow they also forgot that in 1941 the USSR tried to join the Axis.
@@TheKitMurkit Boring virtue signaling.I don't like any such thing,but it's a fact that US military industrial complex has become even more powerful than senate of USA and is main sponsor of terrorism around the entire globe.UCK, Mujahideen,Talibans,Al Quaida, IS,Azov,Aydar,even Khmer Rouge,,all on it's payroll at certain times in history.
@@JohnJ469 Fair point.But meme is more about USA financing entire plethora of terrorist groups only to later bomb them in some fake sort of solution,also placing their military bases around the globe.
@@JohnJ469 because the AK is dirtcheap and state produced, so there wasnt really a incentive to profit involved. I think its mostly when the AKs got outside the graps of the soviets or after the fall of the soviets that it spread in the market. Not because i like or defend communism in anyway.
@@sand8777 yeah, and even your western propagandists say that the subsequent Fulton speech had no meaning and no basis. And you just started a feud with the USSR for no reason. Who's idiot here, u stupid Duck???
The woman and baby changing from one country to another was surprisingly well done
she's white, east asian, middle eastern and african, yeah I just stated the obvious!
Well accurate too?
It's unfortunate they didn't portray the women who willfully sign up for military service in the US.
I'm 14 and this is deep
It’s like less than 1% so a minority and hence excluded
ok but it does seem to have a message that says "profiting off war is a huge mistake with a huge cost, and that cost is life itself"
Things haven't changed since then. Looking at you Ukraine.
Russia is the King of projection and whatboutism to the point where it practically invented those concepts in propaganda and politics. Nothing has changed, they just sought a new audience with their same old propaganda.
@@_blank-_ what did Ukraine do, they’re the victims
@@Dookieman1975 the people, not the government, you cant call a country "victim", because the victims are always the people, the government is the one that makes decisions, and then suffers then concequences
@@Dookieman1975 the citizens are the victims, many citizens want to leave or surrender, Ukrainian leaders are forcing them to fight or die, and Russia tells them to surrender or die.
This is NOT "Anti-Western Propaganda". It's a message against capitalists, weapon manufacturers and nazism/fascism. The Soviets were based producing this clip.
no it's for propaganda purposes
it makes up an evil cartoon enemy bird
No, it’s propaganda. The message is that Capitalism produces a war machine and fascism, when in reality both Capitalist and Communist countries were capable of warmongering and producing giant military machines. The idea that Capitalism is the only source of war is pure Soviet nonsense.
Its propaganda to brainwash brains. But, being against capitalism is actually good.
You are writing your comment thanks to capitalism. In communist USSR cybernetics was recognized as a pseudoscience.
@@harry_j_potterthx for the enlightenment "harry potter"
the fact it's an anti-fascist animation and it's mistaken in the title with "anti-western" is very revealing
WEF/globalism/capitalism is what is in the heart of the west today, military, morally, culturally, so it's not wrong. It's indeed anti-western to root against Israel for instance. The west prove again and again that it can only generates more of the same colonialist/capitalist; in short - anti-human pattern, masked as "free choice" and "freedom". Not saying the USSR was not a hypocriticy, but at least it had the guts to end it's own existence when it didn't live up to it's own social standards and promises. Meaning, that in the end - they were more true to the democratic idea than the western hypocrites.
Sometimes both can be true.
- the guy who was able to type this comment thanks to living in the most free side of the world:
@@unaincreibleroca3427 Its interesting that you read his comment it as understood it as him equating anti-fascism with being anti-westeren. Where I read it as him pointing out other people equate anti-fascism with being anti-westeren.
@@louwritznel3816 ah, perhaps, I'm not sure
I just saw that a lot of the comments were heavily left leaning and because I was in a rush I didn't think much of it
i love how military guy looks worried when bird can't swallow few tanks at the same time, but then goes :D when it manages to do it
I think it’s general Mac auther
@@Noobz4Life11 I think it's just supposed to be a general respresentation of the military industrial complex of the capitalist West, IMO
@@Yet.Another.Rapper.KiG.V2 Oh
@@Noobz4Life11 not sure.He represents america for sure and the other one the tophat is probably UK
@@cenkaliisk7967 Not sure 100% either but my guess was the tophat guy was the capitalist, the business elite ruling class
Despite this been soviet propaganda, this is actually one of the rare cases where the analogy actually does makes sense even today.
Reevaluate
More like ironic given Russia's actions in East Germany, Korea, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Africa, Afghanistan, Chechnya, Georgia, and Ukraine while it was pushing this propaganda.
It's even funnier when you consider the USSR was the main exporter of oil and gas to Germany right to the beginning of Operation Barbarossa.
And even afterwards, the majority of equipment most third world dictatorships and tyrants use Soviet made weaponry.
@@TheFi0r3
And those same tyrants amd dictatorships were installed by the US
@@TheFi0r3 funny how you never learn about the USSR's foreign misadventures/atrocities during the Cold War in school, where its just "Muh Vietnam" and "Muh Operation Condor"
Just because it's written "soviet" in the title, some people's reading comprehension starts to decline
What you mean by that
It's like when you explain to people why they aren't getting paid enough and they start agreeing with you, and then if you mention the word 'communism' they start burning you into a stake
@@abhishekranjan1347 means they start to rage and stop thinking.
But actually i didnt understand the whole story can you explain cause i cant get it yet
@@gtcross4512 I understand like this. The elites of the west feeds it's newborn children (common citizens) with money and lots of propaganda spreading hatred with false information.they also supply their vessels with money and weapon to wage war with various county and nobody is safe. West killed Chinese in the civil war, Japanese in atomic bo"bing, created Taliban, destroyed Yemen Vietnam Lebanon and now Palestine. That's it . Summerization of west activity in one video.
I love the soviet art style, its super nostalgic
1960-1990
Really encompases the old school 1930-40s look
Reported to FBI
youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture
@@Mautiks youtube mary and jesus in the quran and mohmmad in the bible and the Torah and the scientific miracles of the quran and mohmmad in hindu scripture
It was the different women running with their babies that I realized what the message was supposed to be. Both sides fight, at the same time actually helping each other to create a war machine, a monster that will lay waste to the rest of the world. Meanwhile, there are many calls for peace, but while those birds are numerous, they aren’t anywhere near the strength and size of the monstrous bird. They at best create a nuisance.
This is just a part of the cartoon
.....
The message is captalism creats monsters and the world suffers ... only way out is communism
...
...
Witch is very hypocritical considering it was the ussr that aided ns germany for the most time ....
If this had been made in the United States back then, there's no way it would have included a black or Asian mother and baby. "Propaganda"? I think the US propaganda is far worse
I love how you understand it.
the trick with successful propaganda is to start with some deeply insightful truth, then misattribute some or all of the blame
@@bildoswagginz8171 you mean like the United States does
I like seeing both sides of the propaganda war. See how both of them see eachother. Meanwhile the people just want to live in peace.
The US started it, to combat socialism which the people themselves brought
Ahahha no peace. We have 3th ww
@@eeeerfrfrfrfwedwd Peace?
More like, drink beers and forget about peace
we haven’t even had a 3rd world war
@@azariahazariah4493 on this pace, we're inevitably having a one
This is ain't propaganda, this is reality
sure bro
@@Sebaleroma Yes it's bro
Learn english bro@@Kojomogodo009
Propaganda is a persuasion strategy for ideological purposes, with the aim of promoting some idea, principle, doctrine, cause or practice.
No one is born knowing these things
It's anti-capitalist, not anti-western
Right. But the hypocrisy is flagrant.
@@natalyd9674 Which one? The unexisting? You'd learn something about system you're saying something about
Soviet was a country LIKE THIS TOO btw, like a giant evil bird
@@user-lq2hu7zx9o ACTUALLY NO btw
Seeing the mothers run away from the bird while holding onto their babies will always catch my eye
Thats what it was meant for
yeah that was the fuckin point lmao
@@ureyesrbleeding1 so what??? You can say "I like [X] film" and they could respond "That's literally what it was meant for".
What is wrong with you people.
@@nekozombie you aren't allowed to state any opinions on youtube, the fuckwads like the one above make sure that rule is duly enforced
@@nekozombie right? Those two are so mad lmao.
"Wow this beverage is so refreshing 😊 "
"Yeah thats what they're for dipshit"
Very interesting. I was born in USSR in 1974, but I never saw this one.
If I may ask, what was it like?
Oh, you're 48 years old then 🤔
Bro how was life in the ussr
@@algerianmuslim3765 You wipe your ass with a newspaper, and instead of butter you eat margarine. That's all live in USSR
From what i know it isnt really that bad as western propaganda says, you werent starving (during tbe 1970s), nor was it the utopia soviet propaganda says it was.
The eagle did some bad things to Vietnam.
like what? Protected south Vietnam?
@@stagirit384bombings
I'm from Vietnam and it's a civil war despite our government propagandizing 'that it isn't
@@stagirit384fr agent orange protected south vietnam
america on its way to save south vietnam by entering their country for 20 years, bombing everything and then just leaving forcing them to surrender
It wasn't bombed by the Germans though.
So just because the title has "anti-Western" and "Soviet" all of a suddenly people's critical thinking goes out the window and they can't see that it's a very factual and poignant criticism of Western powers and capitalism that should be taken seriously.
"Western", lol. Why are you people obssesed with Eurasian terms? If I go west from America I end up in China.
@@Halcon_Sierreno because it is "west" in the context and location of the Soviet Union, not yours whoever you are.
@@5678efgh3 Oh, so the Soviet Union is the center therefore it is the important one. 🤔
@@Halcon_Sierreno LOL do you seriously not know what "context" means? Go play outside and read a map... you're embarrassing yourself 🤣
@@5678efgh3 America is the most important, superior and prosperous continent. It is the new center, therefore the new benchmark. Henceforth the "West" is Asia and the "East" is Europe. 😤👊💪
It was multiple countries that made up the former Soviet Union and not all of those countries spoke the same language, it's pretty ingenious to have such a message able to go out to each individual Soviet state and no matter the language you'd understand what was being conveyed to you.
a lot of soviet-era films were silent for this very reason - to cross all language barriers and get through to everyone
No, all Soviet countries spoke Russian. Especially when this cartoon came out it would have been decades upon decades since the standardization of the Russian languages.
In fact still most post Soviet countries have a near 40-50% Russian speaking population
Socialist imperialism.
Really the Soviet Union was kinda an imperialist ngl
Kazakhstan left. Never came back.
All I can think of is what would happen if we had a few thousand of this birds, flying around and eating every weapon they could find.
Better lace the weapons with anti-diarrhea medicine :P
Imagine a world leader gathering a whole nuclear armory for years and then a soldier forgets about the scarecrow and lose it all to pigeons
Several weeks into this scenario:
This just in, an incredibly large eagle with explosive feathers has consumed the USS Gerald R Ford. Scientists speculate that it might be the same species of bird as the one that raided the nuclear storage plant in Albuquerque and ate every last nuclear warhead last week. This bird knows no borders, and is in constant hunger. It is unclear why it only feeds on military supplies, but we advise all personal in any military service to be weary of these behemoths
@@thebakersbaker4724 Albuquerque? Are you sure Walter White didn't feed it weird meth to eat weapons?
@@chemplay866 there is in fact a nuclear storage facility beneath Albuquerque with a couple thousand warheads. Look it up if you want
This is art. To communicate without words. Images and sounds.
It's called propaganda when we don't like it. And yet the message was true and it's still as valid today.
this is so well made, it's so anxiety inducing, they really managed to get their point across
@Lill Frigg bit of a harsh take there bud
@Lill Frigg when emotions exist
@Lill Frigg Get you're mental health fixed then come back to society bud
@Lill Frigg anxiety is a real word buddy, surprised you're hearing this for the first time. open a dictionary somtime?
Уровень Советской пропаганды был очень высоким. Там работали лучшие художники, поэты, режиссеры и другие. Но я сомневаюсь, что этот мультфильм снят в СССР
This is an incredibly fascinating cartoon, I’ve been scouring for more info on it with every search term under the sun to no avail. If anyone has a full version or a name for this, please let me know, I’m dying for more info
It’s called sqweeklefArt
It’s called '' We can do it '' (1970)
this cartoon is called "Это в наших силах" (1970)
czcams.com/video/smCCBeO2kPM/video.html
@@vitalychannel9532 holy fuck, that had me in tears by the end
@@jorgedeanoperez2997 there were a lot of masterpieces of human creativity and spirit made. After watching this i can only think about this one, it's anti war too.
czcams.com/video/4oxP3TyuQx0/video.html
Man old animations were so well done
Суть в том, что фашистские организации активно развивались благодаря буржуазии, о том и речь. Фильм против фашистских идей.
Поскриптум: паны и панночки, люди и собаки, либералы и социалисты, националисты и буржуазы, не надо устраивать политсрачей пожалуйста. Все люди когда-то ошибаются, даже лидеры стран, НО это не повод для того, чтобы писать гадости и глупости в сторону других людей.
Будьте добрее ;)
благодаря мировому сионизму
fascism will fall. the eagle will fall.
Which is historically accurate. This is not propaganda but an educational video condemning the evil deeds of the bourgeoisie.
@@ivansnob2360с кукухой явно не всё в норме. А про то как Сталин виноват зачем умалчиваем?
Perfect
Say what you will, but the aesthetic is so awesme.
It is tho
@@eadweard2214 absolutely. It's a shame Russia is such an atrocious place, because the artistic/literary talent of the Russians is staggering.
@@conserva-chan2735 stereotype, and propaganda. Man, learn to identify information, lol. I think you're 2 years old. This is anti-fascist ksta propaganda.
@@buddy7874 of course it technically is commies see anything that isn't communism as fascism.
@Lorenzo Maria Martini don’t know where you got that but ok
The fact it potrays a few different cultures and people as the innocent woman and child seems quite good in a sense that it can come off as everyone feels the addects of war and we should worry.
Just a quick bit i noticed. I cant add more.
those were eastern cultures behind the iron wall. the big black bird represented the rebuild of germany by the US and Britain after the war... russia saw itself as the super power defending the east from that rebuild... they were selling fear... after all they tried to treaty once with Hitler's Germany and due to it they suffered millions of lost lives... after all the decendents of the people who put hitler in power were shown to be vengeful in the past ww1 for reference... So russia to promote their ideology to the masses of the east they had to visually show how the US and Britain were creating a new larger Threat that they might not be able to hold back... in the west we didnt understand this because we never wanted to invade russia... and we were making germany back then an anti war country much the same way Japan became... But in order for russia to motivate its people and justify the sacrifice of giving their lives and hard work to the state to make it strong enough to defend itself from an attack that was to never arrive... but it was all a lie to their people... since russia only wanted to take as much of europe as they could for world power.. and that is where Putin is today in his head... desperately trying to rebuild a weakened Russia to the Strength it had become after ww2... but those satelite states do not want to live under the oppression of Russias ideology anymore because having done so following the war only brought them hardship... plus since 1991 alot of those satelite states got to experience western capitalism and the wealth it brought to them... it hasnt been as great as it could... but it has been better than it was under russian rule. and that is why Ukraine fights so hard now... 30 yrs of freedom has strengthened them and given them reason to fight for true democracy and freedom... which russia despises because it takes money and power away from them and they fear those smaller countries working together because they were treated so poorly during the cold war and fear it will eventually cost them their country...
I think it represents the many cultures US imperialism and the war industry affected, as they are all the victim of the weapon guzzling bird.
The stereotypical 'women' and the addition of 'and children' to keep women in a protected strata and pretense of 'she' does no wrong - just pushing on simps instincts.
@Евгений СССР nyet, Baby!
@@memespeech nice try, incel
it’s not propaganda if it’s true.
No, propaganda can be true. Any political messaging is propaganda.
This is not propaganda. This is a documentary
the original cartoon is called We can do it (Это в наших силах), 1970 and it lasts around 10 minutes. The actual meaning of it is actually opposite - people from all around the world, including Europe, Asia, USSR etc fought together against fascism. So don’t believe everything you see on the Internet 😊
It’s not 100% wrong, they make pretty clear references to the US in Vietnam with the Palm trees and explosions.
@@ecydysis Here’s some news for ya: Napalm and palm trees were also present in Kenya in the 1950 as the British were bombing the independence movement in civilian villages.
@@x2y3a1j5 an organisation that was armed, funded by and indoctrinated by the Soviets
@@x2y3a1j5 The film was presumably made in the 70s while The Vietnam War was still going so it was likely alluding to that conflict than anything else. Nonetheless the British are still regarded as ‘Western’ so my point still stands.
@@ecydysis Yes, you’re right; however I’m intent on spreading awareness about that scarcely known fact about the Brits being the 1st to use napalm against civilians. Both our points stand and I think we understand each other, despite some lack of clarity or manners on my part. Have a good day!
I know the animation is cool and all but the music is also well produced
💯💯💯💯💯
Russian art really is crackin.
@@sameaston9587 Yeah, I'm an American and I think Russian music slaps
Land of Tchaikovsky after all…
@@sameaston9587 Soviet*
Well it’s more like educational cartoon, than a state propaganda
IDK what's propaganda in here
Exactly! It’s a valid criticism of fascism and its destructiveness. This is especially evident in the full length animation, watch it for yourself
0:05 🤦♂️ Pretty much the whole video from this point
Im interested in how old this is, because the arguments used in it is still used today, so it kinda brings into perspective that the debate doesn't really change that much
i mean, in truth even right now the cold war is still happpening in someway lol
Not debats didn't changed but politic of the west-countries
I think the beginning is a criticism to the US bourgeoisie of having sponsored the "you-know-who" party.
Nope. Commies will commie
@@Leviathan399 theres actually truth in this cartoon, i don't see a defense of communism here, but a critiique of powerful elites and military complex feeding wars.
The black bird could be used as an analogy to conflict.
As so many people seem to be misunderstanding what the meaning of this animation is supposed to be here a clarification:
The bird is supposed to represent the german eagle, which you can recognize by its pointy feathers as well as the cracks on the egg at the beginning which form a Swastika. The fat man and the man in uniform represent the western capitalists and generals, who invested a lot of money into the german economy after WWII through the marshall plan and stationed missiles and other military equipment there, after inviting them into NATO.
This animation basically insinuates that the westerners were helping Germany regain power, thus potentially causing them to get out of control and create a new global conflict, which would be more destructive than ever before.
I personally don't think the people who made this wanted to emphasize the importance of world peace. They were rather accusing the west of financing fascists to support them against the USSR. Thus making the Sowjet political system seem supperior and sane when compared to the Western one.
Lmao, nato before Ww2? Man read a book, again, none of your kids know the meaning of this video, you are too stupid and apply your 2000s mentality into this, talking about peace and globalism
Edited: I now know why people warn about the things written in their comment sections, but I genuinely didn't before. If you want to dive deeper, prepare yourself for some nasty little comments under an otherwise so beautiful animation video.
That didn’t seem to bug uncle Joe when he was carving up Poland with von Ribbentrop
Exactly that.
More closure, this animation should be very old one
That's not propaganda, that's reality. Especially today.
Amen
Pretty far from the reality of WWII, the Soviet Union helped the Nazis build-up despite the Treaty of Versailles - not the US or UK.
@@timd6303there is a mote of truth to western businesses assisting in the buildup of nazi Germanys forces, many nations officials turned blind eyes to the unusually high steel demands from german "tractor factories" because exports helped ease the pains of the great depression, but it's a huge stretch to say thats a bigger factor than literally signing a pact with them.
@@timd6303poor Soviet Union, wanted to help and received a invasion
@@timd6303for that?
Socialism---a community working together for a common cause.
Capitalism--making profits at any cost,health care,funerals,housing, war,arms sales,education utilities etc
Communism--the state owns and operates everything
Blud thinks he cooked
Socialism - State takes 50%+ income tax then pays for things for you and gives you access. Hopefully it's trustworthy.
Communism - The state owns all businesses. Without a market economy, it inevitably fails to guess profitable prices and goes bankrupt.
"Capitalism" - State manages security and uses minimal necessary force to manage domestic businesses (ie regulations and trustbusting). People manage their own money and procure for themselves. This harnesses opportunity maximally since any given citizen has the freedom to fill economic gaps themselves and extra capital to help them do it. Naturally, such societies end up wealthier and more plentiful.
The fundamental philosophical divide here lies in whether or not you believe people are better at living their own lives and improving their local environment than a team of experts is at mandating the best way of life and improving any given home environment.
"Capitalism" (Laissez faire) says: empower the locals, they know their own situation best. "Communism" (A version of authoritarianism): The talent at the capital knows better than any local. And socialism is more on the authoritarian side of things.
Also you ascribe monolithic consciousness to capitalistic societies, when in reality it's a situation where every opportunity to make profit is free to be pursued. Individuals go for what they see and want individually. If something is unethical there are often organic repercussions and/or government intervention. The key to the government intervention, ideally, being minimal necessary force and leaving maximal acceptable agency to future citizens to pursue helpful opportunities for both themselves and their community and even that same government itself.
Socialism can only work in the ideal world. The world is far from ideal
regardless on your political beliefs, the animation in this is gorgeous
& true!
@Евгений СССР especially their Soviet era weapons and ration packs. Not to mention the nonexistence helmets and gear they have to source from home. The great bear we were all afraid of during the cold war has been shown to be nothing but a tattered old teddy bear. Poor Russian people. You've gone from a super power to a super joke. And now P*tin has turned you into a third world country now.
this is anti-war animation
@@affable.pebble he got the same as everyone else because... communism XDD
@@Raquel-qc8cq that's not how it works
Actually this is pretty accurate
Also the fact that the Soviet drew humans from multiple backgrounds in a very respectful way compared to the west which drew them in stereotype style in the same era , it took the west more years to fix thier drawing style lol
Edit : Lol I've never thought this dumb comment will cause all the chaos in the replies section chill out guys also thanks for everyone who gave likes
I can agree with this, but not with the actions of those times. I guess the west was always racist
I think that Soviet Union was as racist as west in some causes even worse.
I mean destroying cultures and languages and of nations that was ruled by literal Russian Empire (but with different label) and makes everything in Russian language forcing this nations to learn it.
Torturing them with made up Hunger-Genocide causing deaths of millions.
Yeah
You sound just like a Westerner.
Except its not at all lol, the West didnt fund the German war effort at all, they literally did the opposite and funded the Soviets.
It's not propaganda but the truth.
It ain't propoganda
It's an accurate depiction of Military Industrial complex, the Western leaders so dearly upholds
y'know when it starts becoming goofy when ur bird becomes the cover art for Judas Priest's 1982 album Screaming for Vengeance
I'm talking about the moment at 2:21 if some1 was wondering
One of their best albums “another thing coming” is one of my favs and “Electric eye” I always imagined that bird was supposed to be the “electric eye” surveillance state/war machine bird.
You are absolutely right. I love that album!
The Hellion!
Ok but why did they have to make the nazi bird so cute.
they love nazists, and hate them... It's complicated.
... because it's a cartoon?
@@ghostblues2691 cartoons aren't always cute
@@R0DBS2 So what
@@ghostblues2691 So why did they have to make the nazi bord so cute?
Bro where's the propaganda? This is a fair historical summary
Пропаганда не равно ложь.Пропагандировать можно что угодно, как и негатив, так и позитив, как и вредное, так и полезное, как ложь, так и правду.
Just google "Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact" and educate yourself
@@StalinaNaVasNet. yes, propaganda is a neutral term. People seem to always automatically assume it has negative connotations.
Literally the 1st scene 0:05. Go learn history
@@StalinaNaVasNet.
I understand and agree with you, but the term is loaded in the west to mean "official state narrative of country the US doesn't like
Still true to this day. The bird is Ukraine
And Israel
Let's hope the bird is not NATO as well. After all, NATO is only defensive alliance, right guys? NATO members was never involved in Afghanistan, Syria, Libya, Iraq and so on. We are 1000% the good guys.
@@kotan2k217 it is a coat of arms of the city of Vladivostok, lmao
What a good inclusivity example for the time, although a white woman and her baby are the protagonists that sequence in which they replace her with versions of other races/ethnicities puts all those others in the same place and on the same level. And that done only with an animation sequence of a few seconds, and already with that they are transmitting the idea that "all races and cultures are in the same place, they are the same" without having to oversaturate.
@Chunkopops
“Few countries as hatful as ours” I can name five off the top of my head and can name more if you give me a minute to think. C’mon, the US isn’t that bad, to say we are the most hateful or worst country is such an ignorant thing to say. The fact you say that leads me to think your from a country with those privileges provided in the US or similar, because only in those places can you have the time to complain and hate on a place that thousands of people would be willing to give away their life savings to live in, because it’s infinitely better then what they currently live with. Count your blessings and don’t take them for granted.
@Chunkopops ''less racist'' haha funny joke now go tell that to any lithuanian, estonian, latvian, tatar, ukrainian, polish or kazakh person.
@Chunkopops no offense but you seem incredibly ignorant of the crimes that the soviet union comitted against their own population. I implore you to read up on what the soviets were doing; all in the name of communism but they were basically acting as fascists too.The usa isn't even comparable. For example because of soviet policies millions of kazakhs and ukrainians died in what can almost be counted as a genocide. Not to mention they deported alot of minorities to backwater parts of the country where they were forced to stay. Ethnic minorities in the soviet union had it just as bad if not worse which is why all the republics wanted to split from the soviet union in 1991.
@@hazzmati no offense but you seem extremely ignorant of what this guy was saying. He isn’t offering an excuse for war crimes or a reductive “the USSR was actually good” statement, just the fact that the west’s reductive, regressive view of Eastern Europe are not only untrue, but ironic remnants from Cold War propaganda still being pedaled in the US today
@Chunkopops American racism WAS on another level, racism is still prevalent today, but the media blows it, like most things, out of proportion distorting the people's views. People prey upon America's racist past for "helpful causes" when in reality all they are doing are helping themselves become rich by profiting off of racism. All they do is spread hate, America is not as racist as so many people say it is, but because the news cant bother to show anything but negativity and make everything about race, America is given a bad rap. White people are affected by police brutality as well as black people, but nobody talks about it. It's not about race, it's about abusing power
The most historically accurate documentary about Munich Agreement and interwar Germany economy.
I'm glad to see old Soviet propaganda works on you. You must be a real genius.
@@Shiny101 I'm glad to see that sarcasm is still a superiour form of humour capable of discriminating intellectual elite from retards.
@@Shiny101american capitalists funded nazis and fascists this is a fact
@@Shiny101
Most of the still-existing German companies don't really want to talk about what they did back then, as capitalism actually fed the Nazis and made them bigger.
Fascism was a great way for corruption to make yourself even more money.
Propaganda doesn't always state lies, what's being shown here isn't even that inaccurate.
Capitalism has enough flaws, stop white knighting it wherever you can, or you will be the one falling for decades-old propaganda..
In 1933 Germany was the poorest country in Europe and could not even feed its own population and you want to say that by 1939 they were already able to finance the largest war in history and the most expensive military projects that could be? Ahaha. Hitler spared the British troops in Dunkirk and let them leave, then asked the West for peace, but Churchill did not agree to peace without conditions, the conditions of peace were the invasion of Russia. Hitler failed to invade Russia and was written off. Anglosaxons did not release many high-ranking Nazis from prison until they died, because they were afraid that the world would find out the truth.
Really makes you question if the American British or other at the time big countries supported the natzis and then tried to turn against it as America supported Taliban in war against Russia and then turned against it. Supported ISIS and then turned against it
the mother and baby sequence was very well done!❤
0:15 just realised what the crack looks like
I mean, this is how the military industrial complex became so mighty
The bad guys won WW2. The same cartoon is as valid as it was back in the day. The politicians still get rich with bribes from the war conglomerates. And the constant wars they start make sure there will always be clients. Meanwhile, civilians all over the world are condemned to certain death. Today's black bird is Al Qaeda.
@@korosuke1788 wellll the axis powers were objectively worse with their rapes and genocides
Ya are they wrong?
@@jgordon7719 the axis powers?
Than where was Stalin's Hand in the feeding, he was there longer than the allies.
This aged so well.
Dude this art style is definitely the best I've ever seen. Soviets has really got it going with better looks.
The bird represents nazism and fascism, and the point of the film is that the western warmongers and capitalists “fed” nazism until it got big enough to challenge them and then it got out of hand. The moral of the story is that fascism (and by extension, war and destruction) doesn’t come out of thin air, it is fostered and cultivated by the rich and powerful and the people’s willingness to accept the system that allows fascism to grow.
The bird represents Germany. Germany's symbol is a black eagle and has been since the days of the Holy Roman Empire. So what they're saying is that from naziism a new Germany is born and the west feeds/arms that new Germany until it once again becomes a problem for Europe.
what are you talking about? the usa/capitalism never supported the nazis? the nazis were underdogs who seized control because the people hated communist influence in germany.
It is propaganda to act like the Nazis were funded by the evil West while the Soviets had nothing to do with supporting them. In 1922 the Soviets signed the Treaty of Rapallo with the Nazis, part of which allowed the Nazis to set up factories on Soviet territory to build up their mechanised forced, like tanks and artillery, beyond the limits that had been put on them during the Treaty of Versaille. In other words, the British and French were preventing the Germans from building up their army, but the Soviets gave them a back door to go around these restrictions. Unlike the Soviets, the US and the UK had no such deals which directly helped the Germans build up their military, although there were some loans made to them by financial institutions, these were relatively small in the grand scheme of things. The Dawes Plan involved giving loans to the Germans, but it was signed before the Nazis took power. Most financial aid quickly ended once Hitler rose to power. However, some Some private companies from the UK and US, like IBM, did get up to some unforgiveable stuff which helped the Nazis do terrible things, don't get me wrong. That's why it's nuanced. But on a governmental level, the Soviet government was much more direct in helpnig the Nazis build their war machine. Later, they signed a whole deal with Germany to divide and conquer Europe together, starting by taking different sides of Poland at the same time, triggering World War 2. Yes, you can say quite a bit about some bad decisions made by the capitalist countries, but the Soviets acting like they were not massively complicit is laughable.
Which is exactly the opposite of what happened. The Soviet Union was allied with Nazi Germany, while the evil, evil capitalists were fighting the Nazis. The Soviet Union were on the side of the Nazis up until the Nazis turned on them. Then the evil, evil capitalists saved their butts. WW2 is a story of capitalists destrying fascism and communists getting lucky and getting to exploit and tyrannize people for a couple of decades more.
The mothers in this video with their babies are so beautiful!
Your mom's probably fat and covered with tattoos.
Agreed
Ikr, brings a tear in my eyes
Fr the best part
@@leeldiorr I know right!!
These are facts. Not propaganda.
So your saying the propaganda works on you
That the Nazis were funded by the the rest of the west? No. They were sanctioned. And the soviet union split up Poland with them.
Than where was Stalin's Hand in the feeding, he was there longer than the allies.
holodomor?
Oh, wow, who knew the Soviets made a cartoon out of Eisenhower's military/industrial complex warning speech?
Which is ironic considering the Soviet Union was one of the earliest products of the military-industrial complex.
@@redaug4212 military/industrial/banking complex.
@@redaug4212 Yes, the US intervened in the Russian civil war alongside the better part of the globe, trying to choke the revolution in its cradle, but they failed spectacularly. Not many know of this intervention.
@@ComradeHellas Not only that, but while the US military was deploying troops to the Soviet Union, western corporations like Ford Motor Company, Hercules Gear, and IBM, with the help of federal subsidization, were signing trade deals with Soviet leaders. The best enemy money can buy, as the saying goes.
@@ComradeHellas Not many know? The white army had huge support from the west, and it is well documented. Most high schools in western europe teach that to their students. Where do you get that information ("not many know of this intervention") from ?!
I'd say this is more Anti-Nazi propaganda then anti-western.
Western is fascist
Russians think all westerners are the same
well, i would say NATO is basically the third reich.
It's trying to say that the West was funding fascist regimes.
it shows a fat guy with a monocle and a tophat (commonly used to symbolize capitalism) feeding money to it.
Soviets portraying it as America feeding tanks and other equipment to Germany seems quite ironic
This fit zionism more than germany.
Zionism is the idea of a Jewish state
@Tod_x dumb ignorant 😒
Go check the word meaning before saying nonsense. GO CHECK
Idk but I like the way mothers are drawn here. I have always loved the stylization of women in Soviet cartoons to be honest..
Better than today's anime.
Seeing the different mothers running with their babies was the truest depiction of war mongering I have seen.
The sound and instrumentals is what gets me. It’s truly nightmare fuel in some way for me…
The baby's cries was quite an effective touch to jolt emotions.
Damn, I wish we actually had a giant black terror bird with bomb feathers, seems like a cool... wait a minute.
This is just bird bazelgeuse.
we should push all tax money into creating such bird with genetic engineering, And then feed it with tanks, guns, bombs and taxes to make it big and strong
Based and bazelpilled
@@piotrwisniewski70 We should create the Chickenosaurus first.
@@dibershai6009 Chickens (by biology) is an Dinosaur, except very small. They are birbs, who focuses more on quantity vs quality. I have no idea how they think it's alright but ehh whatever
@@piotrwisniewski70 why else do you think the U.S has such a huge defense budget?
Very smooth animation i like it.
Thank the Russian who made it 50 years ago
@@luigimrlgaming9484 armenian, lev atamanov. he has lots of masterpieces. hayao miyazaki told in an interview that atamanov's film "snow queen" has been a major influence and his favourite film. (i was personally very scared of that film as a child)
@@gadam4254
>atamanov
do you mean *_atamanovian_* ?
@@drdnout он либо лев ***атаманов*** либо левон ***атамян***. никакого "атамановяна" не существует.
@@gadam4254 перечитай свой предыдущий коммент.
It's not a propoganda, it's a harsh reality!!!
How is it reality?
Looks like the Soviet propaganda wasn't quite propaganda but fact!
Reminds me of "goodbye blue sky" by pink floyd
me too
me three
me four. the most haunting piece of music i’ve ever heard.
I mean it is Roger writing after all
1:24 That running here is actually terrifying. Just imagine a giant killer bird running towards you like this.
I've actually dreamed of that once
No need to imagine I have chickens in my backyard
Some backrooms shit tbh
it was to represent racism in white people in europe and usa
Have you ever been to caelid?
This video has been cut from the original, you need to see the full version 'we can do it'
It might be Soviet. And it might be propaganda. But it's very true.
I like that they represented the mothers from different ethnic backgrounds in a way that wasn't racist at all.
The point is that bird (nazi germany) hunts for "different" people
Yeah Soviet propaganda made a point of portraying themselves as the inclusive alternative to racist America. (They were no better.)
the ussr was so woke
@@digitaldeficiency4893 man, back in the Union you could get 5 years in jail for homosexualism... is is kinda based
@@ammonite400 oh yeah they were my man but my expect you to know anything because you know internet and all that really hard to like find stuff out notoriously on the internet. Read a history book
Bro became a dinosaur 💀💀
I meannnn
Birds come from dinosaurs
Don't send your stupid meaningless comments.
1 - wrong or misunderstood title.
2 - Very artistic and smart animation that represents the truth.
3 - the title might be accurate now since NATO and USA are doing exactly that...
When an old soviet propaganda cartoon depicts a more truthful and accurate representation of recent global history and politics than contemporary western news media and commentary
It is propaganda to act like the Nazis were funded by the evil West while the Soviets had nothing to do with supporting them. In 1922 the Soviets signed the Treaty of Rapallo with the Nazis, part of which allowed the Nazis to set up factories on Soviet territory to build up their mechanised forced, like tanks and artillery, beyond the limits that had been put on them during the Treaty of Versaille. In other words, the British and French were preventing the Germans from building up their army, but the Soviets gave them a back door to go around these restrictions. Unlike the Soviets, the US and the UK had no such deals which directly helped the Germans build up their military, although there were some loans made to them by financial institutions, these were relatively small in the grand scheme of things. The Dawes Plan involved giving loans to the Germans, but it was signed before the Nazis took power. Most financial aid quickly ended once Hitler rose to power. However, some Some private companies from the UK and US, like IBM, did get up to some unforgiveable stuff which helped the Nazis do terrible things, don't get me wrong. That's why it's nuanced. But on a governmental level, the Soviet government was much more direct in helpnig the Nazis build their war machine. Later, they signed a whole deal with Germany to divide and conquer Europe together, starting by taking different sides of Poland at the same time, triggering World War 2. Yes, you can say quite a bit about some bad decisions made by the capitalist countries, but the Soviets acting like they were not massively complicit is laughable.
Shows that you're a Commie Ruzzki who doesnt know anything about what ur talking about
1:40 the war no have color
Funny how this pretty much all turned out to be true
This is about how capitalists funded the nazis in the 40's and it was made in 1970, so I wouldnt say they predicted anything, even if capitalists still fund nazis nowadays lol
Not funny how Soviets and Allies committed mass rape in Germany. Now they play moralist. They play moralist with the animation too.
@@greyngreyer5 lmaoooo you're a dumbass, ofc WW1 wasn't a black and white affair, the allies are FAR from being saints, same for the average soldier everywhere else, google soldiers in Vietnam.
Yup, spot on basically.
The Soviet and Allies' plan to destroy Germany worked. Germany is a puppet-state of America (like the rest of NATO), there is no cultural pride, and the Germans will become a minority in their own country.
It's literally how it went with Ukraine in the last 10 years.
1:46. Rights restored.
I like this cartoon whatsoever it's propaganda or not. It's simply story that
this is anti fascist propaganda
@@enemyoftheworkingclass7557 Well yes, because at the end of the day they did remain neutral to fascism. It was more beneficial for them to turn a blind eye and let it continue happening. Fascism was targeting those who were critical of the institutional power they held. But I'm assuming that you were already aware of that because of your username.
@@enemyoftheworkingclass7557 Feeding that bird isn't exactly neutral.
@@davidwuhrer6704 Yeah that's what makes this propaganda piece even more ridiculous.
@@enemyoftheworkingclass7557 It is actually accurate to history.
Fun fact: That propaganda video is accurate
No, it isn't. It is propaganda to act like the Nazis were funded by the evil West while the Soviets had nothing to do with supporting them. In 1922 the Soviets signed the Treaty of Rapallo with the Nazis, part of which allowed the Nazis to set up factories on Soviet territory to build up their mechanised forced, like tanks and artillery, beyond the limits that had been put on them during the Treaty of Versaille. In other words, the British and French were preventing the Germans from building up their army, but the Soviets gave them a back door to go around these restrictions. Unlike the Soviets, the US and the UK had no such deals which directly helped the Germans build up their military, although there were some loans made to them by financial institutions, these were relatively small in the grand scheme of things. The Dawes Plan involved giving loans to the Germans, but it was signed before the Nazis took power. Most financial aid quickly ended once Hitler rose to power. However, some Some private companies from the UK and US, like IBM, did get up to some unforgiveable stuff which helped the Nazis do terrible things, don't get me wrong. That's why it's nuanced. But on a governmental level, the Soviet government was much more direct in helpnig the Nazis build their war machine. Later, they signed a whole deal with Germany to divide and conquer Europe together, starting by taking different sides of Poland at the same time, triggering World War 2. Yes, you can say quite a bit about some bad decisions made by the capitalist countries, but the Soviets acting like they were not massively complicit is laughable.
Honestly, this is INSANELY accurate
Moral of the story: Don't feed birds tanks and military equipment.
Thank you I was about to feed an Eagle 20 nuclear bombs you're a hero
Мораль в том, что всегда найдутся люди, которые своими деньгами и оружием для достижения своих алчных целей (желанием завладеть чужими богатством, ресурсами) будут взращивать амбициозных юнцов и управлять ими. Задача всех людей не допускать расцвета нацистских идей в обществе. Все люди равны в своём праве на счастливую жизнь.
It's more anti-war than anti-western tbh
It’s anti-western, if you actually understand it from the Russian/Soviet perspective and not your own.
@@liesdamnlies3372 can you explain please cause im too lazy to do research on it right now lmao
@@reneablackheart9563 This is saying we fund fascists, and that's why we must be opposed. The whole "we won The Great Patriotic War all by ourselves against the fascists and their Western allies" shtick is huge in Russia.
@@liesdamnlies3372 You make it sound as if you didn't fund Al-Qaeda. You are the bad guys. You financed wars of brother against brother, and then come to pick up the pieces. You printed torture manuals and spread them on Latinamerica. You are the enemies of the world, not just the russians and the many other cultures that today live under the russian flag.
@@korosuke1788 Ah yes, the "America did bad things therefore Russia is good and cannot do bad things" argument.
Look, copypasta from the Kremlin isn't going to get you very far with anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together. Try harder. I'm getting really bored with people like you who are so lazy with their propaganda.
Pretty accurate for what is happening in todays news..
Honestly at this point and how many people in the comments are saying its from another different side of the argument, imma just accept Its anti war, no matter who really made it.
it's not anti-war, it's anti-capitalism. It's saying that capitalism leads to fascism and imperialism.
When its against them they call it propaganda.
Than where was Stalin's Hand in the feeding, he was there longer than the allies.
@@panzer4801 You are stupid by 11 points on a scale of 10
The thing is, both sides, West and Soviet sphere, each made some valid critiques in their propaganda about their opponent. Just because a source is obviously biased doesn'r mean that they don't sometimes tell the truth. Of course, propaganda is both simplified and exaggerated for effect.
The USSR's bogeyman was Nazism.
The USA's bogeyman was the USSR.
It was easy to criticise the Nazis. They had lost the war, and everyone knew what they had done.
The USA's criticism of the USSR was based in projection. Expensive, pointless projects were funded with the sole justification of "the Russians might already have done it." Among the Operation Stargate (attempting to use clairvoyance for espionage) and Project MK Ultra (using torture to create unwitting sleeper agents). It had nothing to do with the actual shortcomings of the USSR, which were actually talked about by actual Communists and Anarchists (Trotsky, Orwell, Goldman, and others) until the House Committee on Un-American Activities made being a Communist or Communist sympathiser illegal in the USA.
@@davidwuhrer6704 True, but criticising the USSR was made a whole lot easier by all the crimes they did actually commit, it was an easy sell !
@@ottodidakt3069 Ironically, the USSR was accused of and criticised by the USA for crimes the USSR did not even commit, instead of the ones it did.
It turns out that the crimes the USA accused the USSR of were ones the USA were guilty of themselves.
@@davidwuhrer6704 i am scared of project MK ultra.
It might still be in effect even today.
@@ottodidakt3069 as if the USA was an angel bruh
.. it is not propaganda it's the absolute truth described through the art of a cartoonist
Shalom
It's true until you realise that the Soviets were bad too
It's literally the opposite of what happened. Maybe get a basic grasp on history, so you don't fall for shit like this.
@@MrCmon113 how bout you get touch with a brain for a change, history is easy
@@omphya6229 you are right
1941-1945: "This man is your FRIEND, he fights for FREEDOM", "Red Army together with the armies of our Allies will break the spine of the Fascist beast", "On our side RUSSIA, with us all the way!"
1945-now:
Soviet Scientist Yuri Bezmenov said that all ideologies are simply a mechanism for controlling the masses. The real world operates on power structures, nothing more.
Союзники во время войны называли социализм "альтернативной/левой/органической демократией" в своей пропаганде.В рамках курса на дружбу с СССР и предотвращения Оси"Белин-Москва" также не было никаких претензий из-за Польши,Прибалтики или Финляндии.Они даже продвигали культ личности Сталина в своих СМИ.Лол😆
@@Gaming_Burnout Don't any personal, just business.
I have seen their posters too
@@Gaming_Burnout Berlin never would have sided with the USSR though.
Wow this bird looks like a Ukraine 😲
Who noticed on egg a Nazi symbol?
Somehow the USSR forgot who supplied oil to Nazi Germany, who helped train Nazi soldiers, who shook hands with Nazi Germany when they divided Poland, somehow they also forgot that in 1941 the USSR tried to join the Axis.
Jesus, probably the darkest propaganda cartoon ive ever seen. Usually they are funny but this one is hell
The shifting of mother and child was pretty smooth
分かりやすい良い作品だなあ。イラストも綺麗。
何を言っているんですか、ソ連だぞ
A lot of people in the comment section think Karl Marx should give you a warm, fuzzy feeling.
What year is this clip from ? Anyone noticed swastika on the egg ? Thanks
1970
US military industrial complex be like:
Yeah, you like muscovy military complex, right srbin?
@@TheKitMurkit Boring virtue signaling.I don't like any such thing,but it's a fact that US military industrial complex has become even more powerful than senate of USA and is main sponsor of terrorism around the entire globe.UCK, Mujahideen,Talibans,Al Quaida, IS,Azov,Aydar,even Khmer Rouge,,all on it's payroll at certain times in history.
Funny how everyone talks about the American military industrial complex but never mention the Soviet AK 47 is the most popular weapon in history.
@@JohnJ469 Fair point.But meme is more about USA financing entire plethora of terrorist groups only to later bomb them in some fake sort of solution,also placing their military bases around the globe.
@@JohnJ469 because the AK is dirtcheap and state produced, so there wasnt really a incentive to profit involved. I think its mostly when the AKs got outside the graps of the soviets or after the fall of the soviets that it spread in the market. Not because i like or defend communism in anyway.
This was scarier than many horror films.
Lol it's not propaganda. It's absolute truth.
@@sand8777 yeah, and even your western propagandists say that the subsequent Fulton speech had no meaning and no basis. And you just started a feud with the USSR for no reason. Who's idiot here, u stupid Duck???