Karl Richter Goldberg Variations, BWV 988

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 31. 01. 2020
  • Karl Richter Goldberg Variations Live in Tokyo in 19 Feb 1979

Komentáře • 21

  • @taka-zq8jb
    @taka-zq8jb Před 4 lety +19

    0:00 Aria
    4:40 Variatio 1
    7:10 Variatio 2
    8:59 Variatio 3
    11:42 Variatio 4
    13:02 Variatio 5
    14:52 Variatio 6
    16:18 Variatio 7
    18:17 Variatio 8
    20:38 Variatio 9
    22:32 Variatio 10
    24:15 Variatio 11
    26:31 Variatio 12
    29:23 Variatio 13
    32:42 Variatio 14
    35:04 Variatio 15
    39:36 Variatio 16 (Ouverture) - 41:25
    42:30 Variatio 17
    45:00 Variatio 18
    46:31 Variatio 19
    48:02 Variatio 20
    50:20 Variatio 21
    53:05 Variatio 22
    54:30 Variatio 23
    56:48 Variatio 24
    59:44 Variatio 25
    1:04:58 Variatio 26
    1:07:22 Variatio 27
    1:09:15 Variatio 28
    1:11:46 Variatio 29
    1:14:02 Variatio 30 (Quodlibet)
    1:15:45 Aria da Capo

  • @marinomarinelli1398
    @marinomarinelli1398 Před 10 měsíci +4

    Che meraviglia, grazie! Nessuno come il sommo e ineguagliabile Richter ha saputo far scaturire così mirabilmente dallo strumento quelle "cascate" vorticose e berniniane che bisogna saper scatenare se ci si vuol misurare con Sebastian Bach.

  • @pietrogiuliano2154
    @pietrogiuliano2154 Před 3 lety +9

    Richter grandioso. Grande maestro e musicista.

  • @AlbertoRoland1
    @AlbertoRoland1 Před 2 lety +3

    Una versione semplicemente fantastica !

  • @CarmenReyes-em9np
    @CarmenReyes-em9np Před 2 lety +2

    Dedicada a su alumno favorito Gldberg. .

  • @pilizorrilla13
    @pilizorrilla13 Před 4 lety +2

    GRACIAS MIL!!

  • @brotherjedi4373
    @brotherjedi4373 Před 2 lety +8

    Karl Richter makes so many mistakes in this live record, but it's still a precious recording! Thanks for uploading!

  • @charlesopels9676
    @charlesopels9676 Před 3 lety +7

    And now I am going to try to go to sleep, just s Count Goldberg did (supposedly).

  • @charlesopels9676
    @charlesopels9676 Před 3 lety +8

    I am NO aficionado, but I find his playing without compare, but that is just me!

  • @carmencasanova443
    @carmencasanova443 Před 3 lety +2

    El,el grande

  • @CarmenReyes-em9np
    @CarmenReyes-em9np Před 2 lety +4

    Dices bien 👍 NO es para aficionados.

  • @franciscoaraya6420
    @franciscoaraya6420 Před rokem +1

    funny 01:37

  • @PointyTailofSatan
    @PointyTailofSatan Před 3 měsíci +1

    His timing is very odd. Almost lurching.

  • @simontaylor2319
    @simontaylor2319 Před rokem +1

    This sounds muddled and unclear on the harpsichord compared to Glenn Gould's piano rendition

    • @EwicoCylinder
      @EwicoCylinder Před rokem +6

      Well the harsichord has a diffrent sound production compared to the piano. And it was never written by Bach for the piano. Because the piano didn't exist in Bachs time.

    • @annamcancarini6953
      @annamcancarini6953 Před 10 měsíci

      Gould's performance in 1955 was pure commercial propaganda! 39 minutes for a work of at least 80!! Moreover in my opinion 80 minutes of G major are really boring. Bach composed wonderful music, but this is almost a technical exercize.

    • @nightshadegatito
      @nightshadegatito Před 8 měsíci

      @@annamcancarini6953 lending an element of noise, of non-music to it, almost a mathematical aspect. Same goes with the Well Tempered Clavier works; there is never a natural reason of only artistic expression to order pieces by rising semitones, etc. To a listener who only knows “I want to enjoy some music for this little while” it will seem boring and unintelligible. They are like puzzles or as you say exercises, when a casual listener isn’t listening for puzzles or riddles. This actually makes it even more beautiful and amazing in my opinion, very unique works and Bach was probably aware of these things I’m saying though on that point I’ll admit I don’t have enough musical understanding and experience to truly say I know it.