Raymond James needs a canopy and some end zone bunker suites. Their scoreboards, sound system, and upgrades to suites/club area are still top notch. The only other thing they need is an entertainment district. That’ll keep it in the Super Bowl rotation for the next 20 years.
I cant believe there is some ground swell for having roofs on football stadiums. There's definitely a reason every single northeast team has open stadiums. I think a dome is just awful for the game. It needs to be played outdoors, and needs to have weather. This is an unbelievable talking point imo.
Hard Rock was a great renovation. Leave it alone! Football is an outdoor sport and let the visiting team bake. If anyone remembers the Orange Bowl when it had Poly Turf, that was hotter than anything anyone has ever experienced at Hard Rock!
*He thinks any stadium with no roof is a bad stadium. In 100 years time they will have floating stadiums that float in the sky. He will then think any stadium that doesn't float in the sky is a bad stadium even if the stadium has a roof.*
Big question I ponder about Jacksonville's "possible" new roof. Will it be a sweat factory inside for fans since it will not be fully enclosed with an air conditioning system? Florida's high humidity in the late summer is almost unbearable. I hope the stadium engineers figured that out.
Not every team can have a winning record, that is mathematically impossible. However, they can control the atmosphere and environment in which the games are played, hence what they’re currently doing.
Any renovation to MetLife Stadium wouldn't begin until 2027 at the earliest. You will not construct a roof of any kind in 2 years ahead of a 2026 World Cup Final match.
0:46-2:32-5:58-8:56-11:39- 12:03-13:14 Tampa Bay Bandits at-Raymond James Stadium San Francisco Demons-49ers Stadium New Jersey Generals-MetLife Stadium Philadelphia Stars-Eagles Field Kansas City Rage-Arrowhead Arena Chicago Enforcers-New Bears Stadium Miami Maniax-Dolphins Stadium Jacksonville Black Bulls-New Jaguars Stadium
I think the consensus among engineers and architects is that adding a full roof to an older stadium is not possible, or at least would cost so much you'd be better off starting from scratch.
@@sirchi8731 A Threat To Move To St. Louis Would Really Make Jackson County Dance 💃!!! I Think If Kansas Offered Them About/Around $1.5•$2.5 *Billion* They Are Moving 15 Miles To The State Of The Jayhawks, Kansas.
As long as their are some tax subsidies then in reality it can happen. Also California would have to give funds to SF Muni and or BART for transportation infrastructure.
0:30 While I get it that it's only a computer-generated render, why does it look like a Nuke went off behind the point of view shown? In other words, what's up with the bright haze?
Canopys are more likely to be installed, instead of the "CLOSED ROOF" option that you are so obsessed with. It's not a plug n play kind of thing... jus saying
What if the NFL tells the Jaguars to play one year all in London (while Jacksonville stadium rebuild) to see how the logistics work having an overseas team?
The 🦅 Should -Not- Add A Roof To The _Linc_ !!!! The Stadium Opened In 2003 @ 🇺🇸 $512 Million (🇺🇸$848 Million With Inflation In 2023), Renovated _&_ Expanded Between 2013•14. A 🆕 Roof, If Feasible, Would _Easily_ Cost 🇺🇸 $500 Million • 🇺🇸$1.3 *Billion* , Which Is Too Much To Invest In A Facility That’s Already 21 Years Old. For 🇺🇸 $1.3 *Billion* , Lurie Should Match & Build A 🇺🇸 *$2.6 Billion* Super Stadium Like The 76ers ($1.3 *Billion* In 2031 With Apartments). Best Plan For 🦅 Is Wait 10 Years Max, Build A Retractable Roof Super Stadium With A Stadium/Arena District That Would Be On Par With SoFi Stadium. Moving Forward, Philly Would Host Super Bowls, *NCAA* 🏈 Playoffs & Championships (Army Navy Game As Well), *NCAA* Regionals & Final Fours, Mega Concerts & Anything Else Sports/Political/Entertainment Related.
If they could do the European model and just give the outside a facelift and a canopy, I think it looks way better. Something like Tottenham Hotspur’s stadium.
I feel like that is what every team that has a stadium is too new to be replaced should do this(ie the NYC teams, the Panthers, 49ers and a bunch of others).
@@great-one0389 what happened to having forever home that you just keep investing money into because that’s where your team is based. It builds a culture and tradition not destroys it.
@@ethanmnufc to me every NFL and mlb team should just keep their stadium for 40 years, and then blow it up and build a new one. The exceptions for this is if it's younger than that and is totally decrepit(FedEx field, Oakland coliseum), and if it's 40 years old or older but a very historically iconic stadium I'm fine with teams getting a modern look but only if the stadium is very old and needs to be replaced. For the NBA the whole criteria is the same but only a 35 year time.
@ethanmnufc many of the current or new stadiums were built without the new features or were multi purpose stadiums that aren't good for any sport. The only multipurpose stadiums rebuilt were hard rock and Torontos. Both cost a ton of money are still not in the top 10 or so in rankings. These current super stadiums will probably last many decades now due to their cost
@@brabblemaster401 There's only one multipurpose stadium left in the NFL or mlb and that's the Oakland coliseum. And yeah a ton of the current stadiums don't have the newer features but I don't think it's worth it to get those features until the current ones are old. As a Steelers fan i'd love to see us get a dome, but Acrisure is fine and still young. It's not spectacular but it gets the job done and it's our stadium. As the newer stadiums like Sofi, and allegiant lasting longer I'll believe it when I see it.
Just build cantilever roofs over just the seating like everyone else does in the world UK ,Europe Aus pretty much everywhere Hard rock stadium for example or what they did in Seattle
Having a roof isn't a matter of keeping the fans and players out of the elements, although this could be the case in Florida, but more like getting year-round use of the stadiums to draw in more and bigger events.
yeah but if everyone gets a roof you're only gonna be getting big event bids every 10 or so years. i dont think it'll make sense financially if everyone tries to do it. using my home field as an example, empower field claims to have 300 events per year as an outdoor stadium (i think thats a stretch) but regardless there is always something going on in the offseason there without many issues. is it worth getting a dome there if the superbowl/final four/etc is going to come to town every 10ish years?
*Why do you think stadiums look better with roofs? Stadiums look better without roofs. They stand out more. They look amazing without roofs. You see all the stands and fans clearly. No shadow is covering the stands. They look more intimidating, amazing and eye catching. They are true stadiums. Stadiums are supposed to be roofless.* *Roofed stadiums don't look special. They make the stadium look generic, like any other building/stadium. They are not iconic, memorable or eye catching.* *Why do you want all stadiums to become halls? When you play football you want to be playing outside in the fresh air, not inside a hall. It's an outdoor sport.* *You want all stadiums to be turned into houses. What's this stupid trend of adding roofs to stadiums. They are ruining the look and feel of stadiums and the sports played in them.*
@@BlazeOfGlory742 Well they could not get an expansion team but if everything falls apart for Jax they could very well move to Orlando and build something new there instead which is really what they should do IMO.
@@scotttild I don't think the NFL would allow two teams to be that geographically close together in FL. If the Jags stadium deal falls through, they're going to Toronto.
Adding a roof to an existing stadium is kinda nuts. The existing stadium wasn't designed for the added weight, so you have to build an entire structure around the existing stadium to hold the roof up.
Raymond James needs a canopy and some end zone bunker suites. Their scoreboards, sound system, and upgrades to suites/club area are still top notch. The only other thing they need is an entertainment district. That’ll keep it in the Super Bowl rotation for the next 20 years.
And push for CFP games again
I cant believe there is some ground swell for having roofs on football stadiums. There's definitely a reason every single northeast team has open stadiums. I think a dome is just awful for the game. It needs to be played outdoors, and needs to have weather. This is an unbelievable talking point imo.
Metlife needs grass first.
Hard Rock was a great renovation. Leave it alone! Football is an outdoor sport and let the visiting team bake. If anyone remembers the Orange Bowl when it had Poly Turf, that was hotter than anything anyone has ever experienced at Hard Rock!
Man this guy loves roofs 😂
*He thinks any stadium with no roof is a bad stadium. In 100 years time they will have floating stadiums that float in the sky. He will then think any stadium that doesn't float in the sky is a bad stadium even if the stadium has a roof.*
@@bushgreen260Seriously, thank you (though Nissan Stadium is trash)
Not any roofs. Translucent roofs that allow a lot of natural light.
And he loves renovations.
Big question I ponder about Jacksonville's "possible" new roof. Will it be a sweat factory inside for fans since it will not be fully enclosed with an air conditioning system? Florida's high humidity in the late summer is almost unbearable. I hope the stadium engineers figured that out.
So the way the roof is designed, it'll act as natural air conditioning.
Same way Sofi's stadium works
These teams need to worry about spending money to have a winning team that’s relevant almost every year.
You mean the Bucs who have won their division the last three seasons and have been setting home attendance records lately?
Not every team can have a winning record, that is mathematically impossible. However, they can control the atmosphere and environment in which the games are played, hence what they’re currently doing.
You meant the New Jersey Giants and New Jersey Jets, playing in the Borough of East Rutherford, Bergen County, New Jersey. LOL. 😁😂🤪🤣😆😄😊👌
Sorry bro but Jets and Giants aren’t the team that represents for New Jersey, The Devils did, both team just using their land for the stadium
Baseball was invented in New Jersey, but New York steals the credit for that, too.
Any renovation to MetLife Stadium wouldn't begin until 2027 at the earliest. You will not construct a roof of any kind in 2 years ahead of a 2026 World Cup Final match.
0:46-2:32-5:58-8:56-11:39- 12:03-13:14
Tampa Bay Bandits at-Raymond James Stadium
San Francisco Demons-49ers Stadium
New Jersey Generals-MetLife Stadium
Philadelphia Stars-Eagles Field
Kansas City Rage-Arrowhead Arena
Chicago Enforcers-New Bears Stadium
Miami Maniax-Dolphins Stadium
Jacksonville Black Bulls-New Jaguars Stadium
The Packers did seriously considered adding an inflatable roof to Lambeau Field back in the 80s.
I think the consensus among engineers and architects is that adding a full roof to an older stadium is not possible, or at least would cost so much you'd be better off starting from scratch.
Have you seen the rendering of Jaguars stadium that is going to be a new stadium.
NLF going indoors for "fan" experience :. I like the snow games.
Some of these teams not getting indoor stadiums
Rain/mud games too
Why are you obsessed with having a roof NFL stadium? You need to just stick to Basketball.
He thinks NBA courts are the same size as NHL rinks, he's clueless with all sports
The Chiefs _WiLL_ Take The State Of Kansas 💵 _&_ Build A 🆕 Stadium In Kansas. The Chief’s Ownership Would Have To Invest Little.
It's possible...but if u really want to make Jackson County dance. Threaten to move to Oakland San Diego or St Louis
@@sirchi8731 A Threat To Move To St. Louis Would Really Make Jackson County Dance 💃!!! I Think If Kansas Offered Them About/Around $1.5•$2.5 *Billion* They Are Moving 15 Miles To The State Of The Jayhawks, Kansas.
49ers need a new stadium in San Francisco. Candlestick is still available to build another stadium.
As long as their are some tax subsidies then in reality it can happen. Also California would have to give funds to SF Muni and or BART for transportation infrastructure.
0:30 While I get it that it's only a computer-generated render, why does it look like a Nuke went off behind the point of view shown? In other words, what's up with the bright haze?
Canopys are more likely to be installed, instead of the "CLOSED ROOF" option that you are so obsessed with.
It's not a plug n play kind of thing... jus saying
Is Metlife even able to build a roof being so close to Newark Airport?
Has it ever been done?
Looks like alot of construction jobs will be here soon!!!!!!
What if the NFL tells the Jaguars to play one year all in London (while Jacksonville stadium rebuild) to see how the logistics work having an overseas team?
Not happening
The 🦅 Should -Not- Add A Roof To The _Linc_ !!!! The Stadium Opened In 2003 @ 🇺🇸 $512 Million (🇺🇸$848 Million With Inflation In 2023), Renovated _&_ Expanded Between 2013•14.
A 🆕 Roof, If Feasible, Would _Easily_ Cost 🇺🇸 $500 Million • 🇺🇸$1.3 *Billion* , Which Is Too Much To Invest In A Facility That’s Already 21 Years Old. For 🇺🇸 $1.3 *Billion* , Lurie Should Match & Build A 🇺🇸 *$2.6 Billion* Super Stadium Like The 76ers ($1.3 *Billion* In 2031 With Apartments).
Best Plan For 🦅 Is Wait 10 Years Max, Build A Retractable Roof Super Stadium With A Stadium/Arena District That Would Be On Par With SoFi Stadium. Moving Forward, Philly Would Host Super Bowls, *NCAA* 🏈 Playoffs & Championships (Army Navy Game As Well), *NCAA* Regionals & Final Fours, Mega Concerts & Anything Else Sports/Political/Entertainment Related.
If they could do the European model and just give the outside a facelift and a canopy, I think it looks way better. Something like Tottenham Hotspur’s stadium.
I feel like that is what every team that has a stadium is too new to be replaced should do this(ie the NYC teams, the Panthers, 49ers and a bunch of others).
@@great-one0389 what happened to having forever home that you just keep investing money into because that’s where your team is based. It builds a culture and tradition not destroys it.
@@ethanmnufc to me every NFL and mlb team should just keep their stadium for 40 years, and then blow it up and build a new one. The exceptions for this is if it's younger than that and is totally decrepit(FedEx field, Oakland coliseum), and if it's 40 years old or older but a very historically iconic stadium I'm fine with teams getting a modern look but only if the stadium is very old and needs to be replaced. For the NBA the whole criteria is the same but only a 35 year time.
@ethanmnufc many of the current or new stadiums were built without the new features or were multi purpose stadiums that aren't good for any sport. The only multipurpose stadiums rebuilt were hard rock and Torontos. Both cost a ton of money are still not in the top 10 or so in rankings.
These current super stadiums will probably last many decades now due to their cost
@@brabblemaster401 There's only one multipurpose stadium left in the NFL or mlb and that's the Oakland coliseum. And yeah a ton of the current stadiums don't have the newer features but I don't think it's worth it to get those features until the current ones are old. As a Steelers fan i'd love to see us get a dome, but Acrisure is fine and still young. It's not spectacular but it gets the job done and it's our stadium. As the newer stadiums like Sofi, and allegiant lasting longer I'll believe it when I see it.
Just build cantilever roofs over just the seating like everyone else does in the world UK ,Europe Aus pretty much everywhere
Hard rock stadium for example or what they did in Seattle
Having a roof isn't a matter of keeping the fans and players out of the elements, although this could be the case in Florida, but more like getting year-round use of the stadiums to draw in more and bigger events.
yeah but if everyone gets a roof you're only gonna be getting big event bids every 10 or so years. i dont think it'll make sense financially if everyone tries to do it. using my home field as an example, empower field claims to have 300 events per year as an outdoor stadium (i think thats a stretch) but regardless there is always something going on in the offseason there without many issues. is it worth getting a dome there if the superbowl/final four/etc is going to come to town every 10ish years?
Surprisingly you didn't include Lumen Field in Seattle.
Seattle got 2 stadiums done right. Both Seahawks and Mariners have stadiums that will last 40 years or longer
Roof there it is
Glazers don't give a crap about the stadium hence go look at old Trafford the stadium roof is falling apart and they won't do shit
What’s the purpose of a roof ?
Hey Ginger,
UFL playing at Rice Stadium today! GOD AWFUL 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Houston GOD AWFUL! Especially in the Summer months 🥵.
100F with 100% humidity
Do you honestly do anything besides conjuring up ideas to bring more dome stadiums? Football was meant to be played outside in the elements.
NFL should make all new stadiums all domes.
No
stay home then
Lmao hell nah
metlife DESPERATELY NEEDS a roof in their stadium would turn it from a 2/10 to a 7/10
MetLife needs it
@@metsandjetsfan5174 Who cares about the Jets. I want them to leave so the Giants can finally have it all outright or decide to do something else.
U don't have to pay that much for a "roof" look up Bayer leverkusen stadium
Bills fans say why not?
MetLife hasnt aged well would be a total waste to add a roof.
*Why do you think stadiums look better with roofs? Stadiums look better without roofs. They stand out more. They look amazing without roofs. You see all the stands and fans clearly. No shadow is covering the stands. They look more intimidating, amazing and eye catching. They are true stadiums. Stadiums are supposed to be roofless.*
*Roofed stadiums don't look special. They make the stadium look generic, like any other building/stadium. They are not iconic, memorable or eye catching.*
*Why do you want all stadiums to become halls? When you play football you want to be playing outside in the fresh air, not inside a hall. It's an outdoor sport.*
*You want all stadiums to be turned into houses. What's this stupid trend of adding roofs to stadiums. They are ruining the look and feel of stadiums and the sports played in them.*
Jags should go to Orlando
Agree so should the Rays. Orlando is a much more vacation spot then Jacksonville. I would bet that Orlando would get multiple SB bids.
Everyone talking up Orlando has only been to the theme parks and thinks that’s whole town. Orlando sucks.
Orlando is not a pro football city sorry be grateful Stern gave them the Magic
@@BlazeOfGlory742 Well they could not get an expansion team but if everything falls apart for Jax they could very well move to Orlando and build something new there instead which is really what they should do IMO.
@@scotttild I don't think the NFL would allow two teams to be that geographically close together in FL. If the Jags stadium deal falls through, they're going to Toronto.
Why would Jacksonville and Tampa Bay need a roof....... hmm ?
Because it's HOT AF in September and Octorber games lol
To the point where people pass out from head strokes lol
Bank of America stadium isn’t that bad. I think it’s a good stadium with good views
I agree. You can see the Downtown Charlotte skyline
Not a bad seat in the house even in the upper deck.
Seahawks’ stadium already has roof trusses that were originally designed to accommodate a lid retrofit.
Adding a roof to an existing stadium is kinda nuts. The existing stadium wasn't designed for the added weight, so you have to build an entire structure around the existing stadium to hold the roof up.
Your moms house
Yes
It’s Mother’s Day
The roof will need a lot of natural light.
Wow are you rude
Why do we live in a world where a person can't have a opinion
Still waiting on the video of what if the twin towers had a roof?
NFL going to be Flag Football in 10 years now ppl want to be roofs on every stadium ppl soft theses days
Why would anybody watch that shit?
@@brandon9621I agree. I think that defense players could really have a chance to strike and make sure they have the right to play..well defense
@@sirchi8731If they get rid of the illegal contact rule maybe defenses can actually have a chance.