At this point, many things other than probability can be left to divine providence. Chaos and fluid flow for example. We don’t have an analytical solution to the Navier-Stokes equations.
I saw Dr. Sam Buttrey win on Jeopardy not too long ago. I think he teaches at this school. He was very knowledgeable. It was in the first Professors Tournament.
1-2+1=-2, 1-3-3+1=-4, 1-4-6+4-1=-6.....-2n : trivial zero of Zeta function, at infinite bottom of Pascal triangle correspond with 1st zero of zeta function 14.134725....etc.
What a great work, thank for sharing ^_^
At this point, many things other than probability can be left to divine providence. Chaos and fluid flow for example. We don’t have an analytical solution to the Navier-Stokes equations.
I saw Dr. Sam Buttrey win on Jeopardy not too long ago. I think he teaches at this school. He was very knowledgeable. It was in the first Professors Tournament.
1-2+1=-2, 1-3-3+1=-4, 1-4-6+4-1=-6.....-2n : trivial zero of Zeta function, at infinite bottom of Pascal triangle correspond with 1st zero of zeta function 14.134725....etc.
RISK Is not knowing what you are doing....
This video seems to be a quintessential example of lying with statistics.
Smartmatics?
statistics probability data analysis
Pascal was definitely smart, but I think Pascal's Wager was logically flawed.