Petra Nieminen's disallowed goal in 2019 IIHF Women's Ice Hockey Finals FIN-USA
Vložit
- čas přidán 13. 04. 2019
- Goal at 00:55. Replays at 02:20. After a long deliberation the goal was disallowed (08:55) and Alex Rigsby from team USA received a 2 min penalty for tripping. Sorry for the watermark.
- Sport
This is a travesty.... that was a golden goal!
Travesty. Mockery of any sort of gamesmanship.
If both goalie and player are going after puck, and the goalie is outside their crease, there is no goalie interference call upon contact. Look at it in slow motion, the goalie is clearly outside the crease, plunging for the puck. Both her knees are on the white, her pad is up in air hovering over the crease. That's a good goal.
And the nonsensical tripping call too... Not to take anything away from team USA who played a great tournament, but the refereeing in this situation was subpar.
Goalie wasn't completely out of crease, Fin player didn't make an effort to avoid goalie, goals can be recalled but not penalty on the goalie tripping because it was wrong in light of the interference
@@tekkenfan01 get yourself glasses
@@antonkuosmanen5879 I have contacts
@@tekkenfan01 same here
This is Finland's Gold.
Finland won every single icehockey winals in 2019 👍
Pikku Leijonat; Leijonat but the woman's were robbed
Absolutely disgusting. Good goal!
Shutup you fools, they may have more videos to review than you fools
@@tekkenfan01 bot here defending blackmailing ref's
@@anttikristian4060 troll
@@tekkenfan01 you are the troll and the worst one .....Do still you happy in your stolen gold?
It is very sad day and decision in ice hockey history... simple wrong ref decision cause based on rules is a valid goal
Good goal. Sorry for you!
Nope, sorry for you
@@tekkenfan01 You're such a nimrod. Almost everyone including most Americans who watched the game thought the goal was good. And you write those stupid ass replies to everyone, not for a second thinking, hey, maybe it's not everyone else who's wrong, maybe it's me. Let me just break it down to you in very thoroughly.
Rigsby leaves her goalie crease to try to play the puck. Hiirikoski steers to the left as hard as she can, avoiding the goalie crease but being unable to dodge Rigsby who's out of her crease. The way the ref on ice sees the situation was Rigsby tripping Hiirikoski, and she immediately calls a delayed penalty for Rigsby. That's right, the US goalie is getting a penalty, not any Finnish player. Watch the situation at 1:00 in the video. The ref immediately raises her hand to signal a delayed penalty. She's in the perfect spot to see the situation, too. There's no conceivable penalty for the Finnish team here.
And I know what you're going to say. Some wiseassery about "Oh Rigsby's left foot still barely hovered over the goalie crease". It doesn't matter. She had left the crease, and most importantly the contact happened clearly away from the goalie crease. Hiirikoski did not enter the goalie crease. You can't just keep one body part at the edge of the goalie crease and make everything goalie interference that way. Or do you often see goalies in the NHL dive at the opposing team's players making a screen and getting them penalties? Of course you don't. Don't be an idiot, nimrod. Rigsby left the goalie crease, and the contact happened way clear of the goalie crease, simple as that.
Immediately after that Nieminen scored, and the same ref called goal, by pointing her hand at the goal. That's how hockey refs signal goal. It's not some secret hand signal that says, oh I've changed my mind let's give the other gal a penalty instead. No, it's the actual sign refs make to communicate that a goal has been scored in this net right here. Seeing as you're a nimrod, I feel I have to explain it to you.
In ice hockey there are delayed penalties. The play doesn't stop until the team about to be penalized gets control of the puck. That's why they call it a delayed penalty. So in this situation the play does not stop simply because Rigsby made a foul. The American team first has to get control of the puck, and then they'll get the 2 minute penalty. But they don't get control of the puck, and Nieminen scores. According to the rules of hockey, Finland should have won the game and the world championship right there.
Now let's forget about all that and think what if. What if somehow Hiirikoski made a foul. What if it was goalie interference (which it wasn't as we can see from the video, but again we're talking what if right now). Then she should get a penalty, not Rigsby. In a situation like this where a goal is called into question, there are exactly two options. Either the goal is good or the scoring team has committed a foul just before scoring and hence they will get a penalty and the goal will not count. In this situation either it's a goal or Hiirikoski gets a penalty. Try to get that through your nimrod head. There are no other options. But when the play continued, team USA got a penalty, and the goal didn't count. What? That makes absolutely no sense. According to the rules of hockey, this situation cannot exist. If team USA committed the foul just prior to the goal, then the goal counts. The referees made a mistake so grave they created a situation that cannot exist in hockey. The goal was not counted and the team scored upon was the one to commit a foul. Absolutely mad.
I know what you're going to say. "Oh but the video ref can't cancel a penalty, only a goal." Exactly. That's the one single thing you're right about. It's too bad you don't understand the implications of the one single thing you're right about, though. Because if they can't modify penalties, then obviously it's not their intended purpose to comment on penalties the on ice refs issued. Yet that's exactly what she tried to do. She said, hey, that thing you saw as tripping, I think it should have been goalie interference instead, and that's why this goal doesn't count. She didn't check whether the puck was inside the goal or if there was a foul the on ice ref missed. She didn't do her job. She exceeded her powers and took a situation that the on ice referee did see and call (again, from a perfect angle, by the way), and said she has a different opinion on it and she's canceling the goal on those grounds. Maybe she had bet a million dollars on team USA or maybe she was just a huge douchebag, but what a goddamn circus.
In conclusion Hiirikoski steered clear of the goalie crease, couldn't avoid contact with Rigsby, and the ref who was right next to the situation thought it was so clearly Rigsby's fault that it warrants a tripping call for Rigsby. Nieminen scored the winning goal, and then a complete robbery happened, when the video ref started playing god. Finland won fair and square, and they were robbed.
I even have a couple of extra highlights to demonstrate just how big of a farce the refereeing in the game was. After the call was made, Mustonen the Finnish team's coach rushed onto the ice to protest. He should have immediately been ejected from the game according to the rules. He wasn't. Instead he was allowed to challenge the ruling, and the coach can't challenge rulings if the team's timeout has already been taken, which it was.
So there you go. Comprehensive explanation to why you're objectively wrong and an idiot. It's up to you if you'll keep being a nimrod or not. If I were you I'd go, hey, maybe the fact that everyone disagrees with me, they have actual arguments to support their position and a clearly superior understanding of the sport and the situation, is enough to make me reconsider, or at least delete my brainless zero value comments like "Nope, sorry for you".
@@martinschultz5596 wrong stupid, didn’t bother to read passed the first line, if you had been more cordial then maybe I would have
USA Goalie called for tripping penalty on the play. How does that goal not count? Finland Goal Finland Gold.
Never seen this until now. Terrible call!
Ja nytkö Jenkit hyvällä omallatunnolla mestareita 2019? heh!
Alright so as a referee in Finland in Mestis (the second highest hockey in FInland) and U20 National league, I can say that what they were looking for was contact with the goalie (was it deliberate or avoidable) and whether they felt like possession had changed away from Hiirikoski. Whether the call was right or not is always up for debate. I personally feel like these calls are really really tough to make even for us when using video review. So even though I do not (looking at these angles) agree on the decision they must have had conclusive evidence and better angles that aren't shown here. Sad that this happened because Finland would have deserved this SO much, but these things happen...
You're not at a top league like SM though and even top league referrees make mistakes. The rules are quite clear, and the goalie leaped in front of the player outside the crease, so avoiding action was taken but not possible. The referree hiding her mouth so that people would not know what they're talking about is complete bs, and so is IIHF's behaviour in quite many events, allowing countries to pressure refs to change results. I like hockey especially, but sports are kind of more ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ to me nowadays because of the corruption and politics that happen all the time.
The biggest scandal in national hockey.
Nice goal!!!
RestlessJack 00 didn't count
@@tekkenfan01 fu
Just a truly awful decision and it would have been so good for women's hockey if they had won.
That's why you're not a ref cuz you suck
ihan selvä maalihan se oli!
päivänselvä maali oli
Finland are women hockey world champion.
Not this year, or any year so far
Michel Lauzon Finland are awesome:)
Absolutely they are, loves them I do:)
Fins second to USA, at least they beat Canada
True, very true, fair and square, they did indeed.
This is a travesty,Finland got screwed over,😮
I’m disgusted she’s out of the crease she barely gets hit that’s a good goal on all counts
3:31 stunningly beautiful Finnish women😳
It's good goal even if they inference goalie?
WTF this goal
Most egregious miscarriage of hockey refereeing since Russia got completely refereed into a win vs Finnish men in 2014. Actually this is likely worse. Underdogs be getting swindled.
Jenkki mokella kyllä toinen jalka sinisellä, jos ollaan rehellisiä. Sitä ei tiedä jeesuskaan, miksi sitten veskari sai boksia kampituksesta.
Nii ku sehä tossa just on. Se on niin ihmeellinen, ku jos ois maali hylätty ja jäähy Suomelle, ni ok. Mut ku se pistää mokelle 2min JA hylkää maalin. Mit vit.
Ei riitä, että on boksissa. Kontakti tapahtuu reilusti alueen ulkopuolella ja maalivahti estää omalla sivuttaisliikkeellään pelaajan liikettä.
@@Furcapper Sääntökirjan mukaan tuo oli maali. Hiirikoski luistelee kulmaa kohti pelatakseen kiekkoa, maalivahti estää turhalla sivuttaisliikkeella luistelun ja kampittaa Hiirikosken. Pykälät 185 ja 183 mukaisesti kontakti oli tahaton ja maali olisi pitänyt hyväksyä.
@@Peketiivari jep
Rigsbyhän tuskin teki sitä tahallaan kampitusmielessä. Kiekkoahan yritti jotenkin tavoittaa. Ajoitus oli vaan niin kohtalokkaan tarkka, ettei Hiirikoskella ollut enää mitään tehtävissä.
Ja loppu onkin sitten... no, historiaa.
У,девчат,промеж,ног,проверить,надо,что,там,нахолича.
Onpas vaarallisen rehellinen maa mennään jopa omia vastaan
2021 games are played in North America. I'm guessing that gold doesn't leave the continent. If all fails referees will guarantee
That's really not fair.
The USA has a strong track record of cheating in international events, but Canada does not. Canada just happens to have a lot of good hockey players.
@@MultiCappie as an American, true
See Kendall Coyne's reaction at 9:00 !! What a goof clown she is. That was clearly a goal, everyone knows it, so you shouldn't be acting like you just won the Stanley Cup.
Ymmärrän kyl miks ei hyväksytty
Miten sama tilanne voi olla yhtä aikaa maalivahdin häirintä ja kampitus toisin päin??? Niin se selitettiin...
@@mikeymcmikeface5599 tässä nähdään harvinaisen paskaa tuomaripeliä!
Sääntöjen 185 ja 183 mukaisesti kontakti on tahaton ja maalivahti estää Hiirikosken liikkumisen kiekkoa kohti kulmaan. Selvä maali...
I would have been ok with Finland winning but the end result is correct, read the rules, the refs got it right, no goal, USA won fair in shootout. I’m USA btw
Lockon Stratos Yes, I'm thinking it wasn't the fact of Rigsby being out of her crease but the referee had her arm up, calling the tripping Penalty, I'm speculating on this one.
David Butler ok
They penalty call was against the US Goalie. As a delayed penalty. the play should continue until a US player touched the puck. None did. Goal scored. No GT interference. The penalty was called on the US player. Good goal.Outrageus call.
@@sgtcrab1 nope, the Fin player made no efforts to avoid the goalie, no goal
@@tekkenfan01 Wrong.