Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.

Quantitative Chemistry (Moles) - Chemistry GCSE (old version)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 18. 08. 2024

Komentáře • 152

  • @lilygarnett5073
    @lilygarnett5073 Před 5 lety +44

    Really helpful. Couldn't understand moles at all but now I can happily battle through them. Great light hearted video and love the layout too.

  • @exooppa769
    @exooppa769 Před 6 lety +119

    THANK YOU SO MUCH LIKE YOU'VE SAVED MY LIFE FOR TOMORROW

  • @MariadzLopez
    @MariadzLopez Před 5 lety +42

    Why haven’t I discovered this video sooner! God bless youuuuu I literally understood everything 😂

  • @laibakhan3843
    @laibakhan3843 Před 5 lety +35

    I FINALLY UNDERSTAND!!!
    THANK YOU!!!

  • @louisehunt3789
    @louisehunt3789 Před 5 lety +12

    oh my gosh where has this been my whole life?!

  • @FloralhattieX
    @FloralhattieX Před 5 lety +24

    Revision=done for my chemistry GcSE tommorow- never understood this In class thank you ❤️❤️

  • @lichh64
    @lichh64 Před 6 lety +29

    I wish you were my teacher!

  • @SuperMarine-uk2wp
    @SuperMarine-uk2wp Před rokem +2

    got my gcse chem mock tomorrow, this explained it better in 12 minutes than many hours of lessons dedicated to moles. thanks!

  • @Jak-ub3ds
    @Jak-ub3ds Před 5 lety +6

    Surprised this only has 10k views, very helpful

  • @sx4fa
    @sx4fa Před 2 lety +2

    i'm going to cry. thank you so much. i've never understood this even though ive gotten all my teachers to explain it - but you've just helped me so much. you're amazing. thank you!!!!

    • @jawatu6326
      @jawatu6326 Před 2 lety

      Good luck for tommorow

    • @sx4fa
      @sx4fa Před 2 lety

      @@jawatu6326 thank you! you too. :)

    • @jawatu6326
      @jawatu6326 Před 2 lety

      @@sx4fa are you ready?

  • @katiemcmanus5842
    @katiemcmanus5842 Před 5 lety +16

    Best science videos ever !
    Free science lessons has nothing on this

  • @Yurmum55
    @Yurmum55 Před rokem +3

    Got the exam tomorrow., thank you !!

  • @ionamacmillan2347
    @ionamacmillan2347 Před 5 lety +5

    After being taught for years and not understanding one 12min video has got me sorted. Life saver for my exam!!!

  • @nevermind4278
    @nevermind4278 Před 5 lety +9

    OMG thanx u saved my life for my chemistry test tomorrow. 😊😊😊

  • @allisony.8718
    @allisony.8718 Před 2 lety +3

    Brilliant video for me, as a self study student. Although the guys is like story telling and his presentation isn't like textbook, this video just helps me remember by understanding and I don't have to just cram the calculation methods into my head

  • @whoskiloo
    @whoskiloo Před 5 lety +3

    Better Than CZcamsr primrose kitten by far

  • @secretcoffeeaddict9437
    @secretcoffeeaddict9437 Před 5 lety +2

    this video made this topic so much easier to understand!!

  • @aurignyfrench9780
    @aurignyfrench9780 Před 2 lety +1

    This video is amazing! Now I feel much more confident going into my test tomorrow!!! Would reccomend to anyone struggling with moles and mass etc!

  • @murugesusivakumar2506
    @murugesusivakumar2506 Před 4 lety +4

    Thank you so much, this was so helpful for my revision. I will definitely remember the formula for moles because of the grams rams thing.

  • @woosy4766
    @woosy4766 Před 5 lety +3

    Im doing my double award chemistry gcse tomorrow and Im absolutely sh*tting myself and Im so thankful for your videos!

  • @nikazain6498
    @nikazain6498 Před 5 lety +7

    Thank you sooo much🙏❤️

  • @upasnakarthik5778
    @upasnakarthik5778 Před 5 lety +3

    Thank you sooooo much for this video. A real LIFE SAVER.. sending love 💕💕

  • @happypants6150
    @happypants6150 Před 5 lety +2

    Thank you!!!! you are so much better than my teacher!

  • @kaydincathey
    @kaydincathey Před 3 lety +1

    Very helpful, sir! And your accent is awesome!👍😄

  • @NM14825
    @NM14825 Před 3 lety +1

    thankyou reall
    y helped with my understanding of this i watched other videos but they were really complicated :)

  • @ronthebear6656
    @ronthebear6656 Před 5 lety +3

    Thanks for a clear explanation. Finally I get this

  • @sasasasa-
    @sasasasa- Před 3 lety +1

    THANK YOUUU MY TEACHER TAUGHT IT TOO FAST AND I GOT CONFUSED WATCHING THIS MADE IT CLEARER

  • @softandsticky8438
    @softandsticky8438 Před rokem

    i have my chemistry gcse in 2 hours and your videos have helped me so much the last few days, thank you so much

  • @radiyahhh
    @radiyahhh Před 5 lety +3

    THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH explained it so so so well!!

  • @muzammilshiraazi5363
    @muzammilshiraazi5363 Před 4 lety +1

    Thank you so much for helping me out

  • @user-rx6kg3yl9v
    @user-rx6kg3yl9v Před rokem

    Thank you so much, I have a mock tomorrow and this has really helped me out!

  • @orlawatson6916
    @orlawatson6916 Před 5 lety +6

    This was great thank you sooo much!

  • @YES-nn1rg
    @YES-nn1rg Před 2 lety +1

    Truly YOU are the besttttttttt❤❤❤❤❤

  • @nesrinahmed2069
    @nesrinahmed2069 Před 4 lety +3

    Wowwww better than my teacher
    Can you cover igcse grade 9 chemistry

  • @aldanyiu4352
    @aldanyiu4352 Před 5 lety +2

    Thank you.... really bad at doing moles before

  • @AmayaW3
    @AmayaW3 Před 6 lety +6

    Very helpful!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @azkieran3030
    @azkieran3030 Před 6 lety +16

    this is hard bur you expladed it well

  • @fishmcfish3850
    @fishmcfish3850 Před 5 lety +2

    Thank Jeebus someone can explain it in English. My chemistry teacher has been off for 4 months and supply teachers aren't very good at teaching.

  • @transgrl
    @transgrl Před 5 lety +3

    Thanks! I understand it now, actually feels easy aswell now!

  • @iamthebystander1937
    @iamthebystander1937 Před rokem

    Thanks a lot for this,got a test tomorrow and I forgot how to do quantitative chemistry

  • @ayethirah
    @ayethirah Před 5 lety +2

    your videos are so helpful❤️

  • @JD-nl7mf
    @JD-nl7mf Před 3 lety +1

    3:18 I thought relative formula mass was for ionic compounds?

  • @rudythorns8411
    @rudythorns8411 Před 5 lety +2

    i was really thankful for ths vid thanks ! :)

  • @coolfred9083
    @coolfred9083 Před 5 lety +3

    #protons

  • @archiehickling7311
    @archiehickling7311 Před 5 lety +2

    This really helped, thank you so much

  • @vanila6923
    @vanila6923 Před 2 lety

    im so glad i found your youtube channel because you have helped me out so much!!! thank you!!

  • @maxwellman7192
    @maxwellman7192 Před 2 lety

    really good video, helped me understand moles and the whole idea pretty clearly

  • @HeisenburgJehangiri
    @HeisenburgJehangiri Před rokem

    Helped me a lot. Thanks!!!

  • @tiarnanmckeever7945
    @tiarnanmckeever7945 Před 4 lety +1

    thank you man i didn’t understand this

  • @Ebonyrose1401
    @Ebonyrose1401 Před rokem

    Thank you so much this was so helpful!!!

  • @datonebro613
    @datonebro613 Před 2 lety +1

    Thanks

  • @hardyultra32
    @hardyultra32 Před 3 lety +1

    You are simply amazing!!!

  • @orlawatson6916
    @orlawatson6916 Před 5 lety +3

    Please can you do
    Titration calc
    Neutralisation calc
    Gases and solutions calc
    Atom economy % yield

  • @anthoniamills
    @anthoniamills Před 4 lety +2

    New subscribers honestly I didn’t understand it and I hv Test Tomo but now I do thanks so much 💞🎉

  • @amandanorman324
    @amandanorman324 Před 4 lety +7

    This really made sense to me thank you and a great way to remember the calculations. I used the method for an AQA GCSE practice question but it seems they didn't use the balanced equation given in the question but the unbalanced equation. I'm confused now.....is it different for different courses?

    • @noelle4145
      @noelle4145 Před 3 lety

      I think you need to balance the equation yourself, in some situations they won’t give it to you balanced.

    • @musicchannel3525
      @musicchannel3525 Před 3 lety +1

      @@noelle4145 thank you

    • @pantherplayz8390
      @pantherplayz8390 Před 2 lety

      I know

  • @oliviak8081
    @oliviak8081 Před 5 lety +2

    i think you rounded moles of iron (iii) oxide form 1.875 to 1.88 and that changed the result because i didn't and in the end i got 210 tonnes not 211

  • @Lyricfact0ry2.0
    @Lyricfact0ry2.0 Před 2 lety

    My exam i tmmrw and u hv saved me

  • @aoifesalamone9302
    @aoifesalamone9302 Před 2 lety +2

    i love this BUT HE WROTE IN BLACK SHARPIE ON A WHITEBOARD??? THAT DOESNT RUB OFF apart from that very helpful

  • @shariksh229
    @shariksh229 Před 3 lety

    You are a Great teacher

  • @oyehoyesyaapa
    @oyehoyesyaapa Před 5 lety +1

    Thank you, thank you ever so much

  • @Hypermuseic-vr3zk
    @Hypermuseic-vr3zk Před 2 lety

    Thanks you for this!!

  • @ShadowX_491
    @ShadowX_491 Před 3 lety +1

    I unfortunately didn’t understand the last bit
    Like the 2nd worked ex after the part where you got moles of the reactant
    Could you somehow make the explanation a bit simpler

  • @ashfaqunnaharnila4845
    @ashfaqunnaharnila4845 Před 3 lety

    THANK YOU!

  • @Bumbleboobeee
    @Bumbleboobeee Před rokem

    life savior ong

  • @avarose7556
    @avarose7556 Před rokem

    I learnt more from this than my actual chemistry lessons in school

  • @advaybandaram4027
    @advaybandaram4027 Před 2 lety

    bro ur the best

  • @jc-1554
    @jc-1554 Před 3 lety +1

    GRAMS OVER RAMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @oliviahyde476
    @oliviahyde476 Před 5 lety +1

    more examples of moles at the end plz

  • @niliniri1835
    @niliniri1835 Před 5 lety +2

    but seriously,thank you

  • @na_148
    @na_148 Před rokem

    Thanks❤️

  • @_._790
    @_._790 Před 2 lety +2

    Hello, can you explain the non-directional of ionic bonds and directional of covalent bonds please? I don't understand this logic, thanks a lot!

  • @haileighcurtis7913
    @haileighcurtis7913 Před 5 lety

    very clarifying

  • @iconichisoka7642
    @iconichisoka7642 Před 3 lety

    this tutorial ate 👁

  • @ayethirah
    @ayethirah Před 5 lety +2

    THANK YOU i hope this will help me pass my chem exam tmr

  • @jensonstretch971
    @jensonstretch971 Před rokem

    S tier content

  • @frogtears
    @frogtears Před 2 lety

    watching on the bus on the way to my chemistry gcse 😭😭

  • @yxuzii5288
    @yxuzii5288 Před 4 lety

    ty professor

  • @sforstunner
    @sforstunner Před 4 lety +1

    this was great!

  • @tanishka7470
    @tanishka7470 Před 3 lety +1

    hey, can you plsssss make a video on stoichiometry as soon as you can since my exams are near and i dont know anything

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  Před 3 lety +1

      Stoichiometry is just the ratio of one reactant/product to another 😊

    • @tanishka7470
      @tanishka7470 Před 3 lety

      @@ScienceShorts oohhh. Thanks

  • @johnmccabe5761
    @johnmccabe5761 Před 5 lety +1

    I thought 2Fe and Fe2 both mean that there are 2 atoms of iron present? If so, your ‘ratio’ step wasn’t necessary.

  • @kirollosromany8422
    @kirollosromany8422 Před rokem

    thanks man

  • @sansamman4619
    @sansamman4619 Před 6 lety +4

    10:58 , we had ( Fe2 ) in the reactant then, we had ( 2Fe ) in the product, doesn't that make a difference? { I didn't even know what computational chemistry was, this is my introduction to it. So, forgive me if this is a silly question... )

    • @sourmango4760
      @sourmango4760 Před 5 lety +5

      in the case of balancing equations it does not make a difference as the no. of Fe going in is the same as the number of Fe going out. Also dont ever ask for an apology if you want to know something everyone had to start somewhere

    • @itsalex1010
      @itsalex1010 Před 5 lety +1

      @@sourmango4760 u seem like a nice guy

    • @Unknown-wi8yv
      @Unknown-wi8yv Před 5 lety

      San Samman there is no such thing as a stupid question

  • @logandowie2129
    @logandowie2129 Před 3 lety

    Very good vid mate c

  • @bushra.a665
    @bushra.a665 Před 3 lety +2

    8:56 why don't we need to know the carbon?

    • @danielmuzani7466
      @danielmuzani7466 Před 2 lety

      do u already know the reason?i want to know too :(

    • @enochcore
      @enochcore Před 4 měsíci

      @@danielmuzani7466 late reply but its because the question does not involve carbon in it so its pointless

    • @danielmuzani1235
      @danielmuzani1235 Před 4 měsíci

      @@enochcoreblud im in college now

  • @arfanrahman8040
    @arfanrahman8040 Před 3 lety

    Great!

  • @nbsgamer6917
    @nbsgamer6917 Před 5 lety +1

    isn't there a simpler way. I just did iron relative mass times 2 and divided it by the relative atomic mass of the Iron oxide and times it by 300 and I got 210 g

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  Před 5 lety +1

      Congrats - you found the speedrun strat. Not everybody can deal.

  • @nessysamp2094
    @nessysamp2094 Před 5 lety +1

    Legend I

  • @ExertGames
    @ExertGames Před 6 lety +3

    Can u do medical physics a2 aqa?

    • @ScienceShorts
      @ScienceShorts  Před 6 lety +1

      I'm sorry mate, not until at least next year.

  • @najmzmohamed668
    @najmzmohamed668 Před 4 lety

    thanks

  • @tanishka7470
    @tanishka7470 Před 3 lety

    also i want to share your vids withEVERYONE I KNOW

  • @niliniri1835
    @niliniri1835 Před 5 lety

    Thank you,next

  • @miam.g
    @miam.g Před 4 lety +1

    8:09

  • @slix5953
    @slix5953 Před rokem

    at 3:39, why did you do oxygen twice? isn't it diatomic or is that not related to it?

  • @jamesthejoker7415
    @jamesthejoker7415 Před 2 lety

    Just a small query, for the last bit when we calculate the mass of Iron using the mole ratio, would the RAM not be 112 instead of 56 because on the formula it says “2Fe” so would you not multiply 56 by 2?

    • @hellobroskiwhatsgood
      @hellobroskiwhatsgood Před rokem +1

      sorry this is so late BUT noooo! as basically you would only multiply by 2 if it is the subscript (e.g Fe2) hope that helps :) the reasoning is that some elements are di-atomic meaning they come in pairs of two for (as the prefix 'di' suggests) for example O2, and this is their original form as they do not have a full outer shell by nature and therefore form covalent bonds with another atom of themselves to get to one - oxygen is in group 6 meaning 6 outer shell electrons which makes sense as they would form one covalent bond meaning they share a pair of electrons, this in turn gives them 8. However other elements may not be di-atomic by nature so you are changing their properties by multiplying them by 2. You can however use the multiple in front to determine how many moles you have of each substance for instance if you have the equation 2Fe + 3O you would have a molar ratio of 2:3 you can use this to later discover the limiting reactant, so the one that is consumed first in the reaction, and limits the reaction when it is consumed. Once again hope this helped! sorry it is so long and late!!

  • @PianoScenesMoviesandSeries

    1:15 Why did you use a dot for the first multiplication but an X for the second? Shouldn't it always be a dot in chemistry and physics?

    • @randomguy4488
      @randomguy4488 Před 5 lety +2

      its a decimal place, dots are never used as a multiplication symbol in the UK

  • @maryamsiddiqui5974
    @maryamsiddiqui5974 Před 2 lety

    PLS DO A LEVEL CHEM VIDS 😭

  • @preludeduetdennisanna7678

    i am speed

  • @lichh64
    @lichh64 Před 6 lety +2

    To be honest I don't have a problem studying this topic, but thank you because lots of my friends are struggling with it!.

    • @ZhDKarma
      @ZhDKarma Před 5 lety +6

      hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    • @lollos3468
      @lollos3468 Před rokem

      @@ZhDKarma his search history would say otherwise

    • @josh3476
      @josh3476 Před rokem

      @@lollos3468 it’s been 4 years bro

    • @lollos3468
      @lollos3468 Před rokem

      @@josh3476 ik lmfao just thought it wld be funny

  • @Ben.A-Mella
    @Ben.A-Mella Před 5 lety +1

    How is sodium 23?? And oxygen 16???

    • @chaosbeam6031
      @chaosbeam6031 Před 5 lety +1

      What do you mean? If you go to any periodic table of elements you can find that oxygen ( "O" in group 7) has an atomic mass of 16 and sodium ("Na" in group 1) has an atomic mass of 23!

    • @nefiyaroy8512
      @nefiyaroy8512 Před 5 lety +1

      Atomic mass

    • @Ben.A-Mella
      @Ben.A-Mella Před 5 lety +2

      @@chaosbeam6031 ohhh okay thank youuu

    • @itsalex1010
      @itsalex1010 Před 5 lety +1

      @@Ben.A-Mella loool comeon mate, pattern up

  • @jelinsalin815
    @jelinsalin815 Před 4 lety +1

    2020 students where u at??