C Wave Technology Explained by Mark Levinson
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 03. 2024
- Original Video
• Video
Lone Crow Audio Hours:
Tuesday - Friday - 12:00 - 8:00
Saturday - 10:00 - 6:00
Sunday - Monday - Closed
4918 Sonoma Hwy. Santa Rosa, Ca. 95409
707-791-3237
LoneCrowAudio.com
LoneCrowAudioStore@gmail.com
#audiophile #hifi #hifiaudio #homeaudio #subwoofers #speakers #amplifiers #danielhertz #marklevinson #solidsteel #cardascable #primus #audioporn #music #musicporn #amplifier #highend #tubeamp #vynlcomunity #vynladdict #vynlrecord #vynl #vynllove #records
Lone Crow Audio LLC. Located in beautiful Sonoma County NorCal.
They used a very small sample size. Is it published and where, peer reviewed, confirmed by independent labs, etc,?
There are many people who just love music and to that end they just listen to the music ... they are SO happy to just be entertained... they don't care or understand all the psycho acoustic nuances lol 😊
Especially when one asserts that it is possible to hear two samples that are 1/44,100th of a second apart as does Mark here.
How do you stand with Class D audio amplifiers then ?
Sir M. Fremer has shown us User many times why analog sounds way better/ different as any digital audio ,even Jay’s Audiolab has shown not long ago , how different analog is from digital. For me it is clear, for what Sir Levinson and his team got the patent
Very interesting solution to the signal loss issue Mark..(but now we are creating material that was not originally recorded ...i suspect that too may have negative aspects)...seems you are figuratively are beating around a bush so to speak...for a true 'loss less' digital recording format ..if anybody can come up with that,
..you're that guy
your right 65db dynamic range would sound very diferent ! 3% or more distortion verses .05 would sound very diferen,in deed !
Isn't the answer a programmable high end DAC that can be programmed to suit the listener's taste and sensitivities ...
sounds like a" pyle " of shit to me. soo what your sayin' is when you record since or square waves through PCM it comes out distorted,right ? music is sound. who want's to get lost in it anymore ? speakers are the key,most modern,expecialy,and including older ones, have the box Q to low.but you tought,back then that high Q box designs sound muddy because your recordings were moddy. thanks let me know.what happened to the old planner/electrostatic units,no dymanic range/like aalog recordings/right? you got it all figured out ounce again !?! i can see elecronic crossovers work better than pasize and time delay is "kinda" a problem.but ohh well 1
Can you provide more details on the test procedure and the name of the 13k device you used. Also how did you measure liver and kidney function in real time. Also did you do the tests with „pure analog“ signals as well to compare. The CMP in the graph leads me to believe you did a blood Comprehensive metabolic panel, is that correct?
Also the renal cortex in the graph did you take tissue samples of the kidney? Also how many participants did the study have? Is there a paper about the topic released in peer reviewed papers. And can you name of the doctors and scientists you mentioned in the video?
His test sample was only 4 people lol
I hope this is available as an add on.
I like my system. I have recently been playing digital music and the louder it gets the more irritating it is.
I don’t know what affordable is defined as these days but, I won’t be buying another amp or whatever just to get this. I just can’t.
I have to say listening to my music does not stress me, my sound is not harsh or brittle, I'm not saying that digital music can be cold and clunky and I agree the warmness that albums I bought in the 70's had that but DVDA DSD and Blue ray all of those analog qualities, streaming is the worst culprit I find it appalling, so I agree with you halfway, the other problem is cost it always comes down to money how much that unit shown what is the price of that or can software be developed like say Audirvana, that takes the digital signal and turns it into C wave.
A subject I have been discussing since digital first came out. Had an interesting discussion with some Sony and JVC engineers at a Nashville AES meeting on Digital before the CD came out. I was showing them about a frequency linear time shift distortion caused by the sampling and reconstruction and how it would cause this. They laughed and said with input and output filters being as bad as they are, no one would notice it! I've brought up the extra stress to the brain caused by digital over analog. Like a worn out VHS compared to a distressed DVD. With the VHS the picture just gets fuzzier in spots. With the DVD, it's sharp until it isn't. It's gone, It's a block or a locked screen.