Vývoj českého masivu

Proč dnes máme v Česku zrovna takové horniny? Kdy, kde a jak vznikly? Toto video vás (velmi stručně) seznámí s geologickým vývojem českého masivu.
Reference:
Edel, J.B., Schulmann, K., Lexa, O. and Lardeaux, J.M., 2018. Late Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic and tectonic constraints for amalgamation of Pangea supercontinent in the European Variscan belt. Earth-science reviews, 177, pp.589-612.
Kachlík, V. (2003): Geologický vývoj České republiky. SURAO Praha (v el. verzi PDF na adrese: www.natur.cuni.cz/ugp/main/sta...)
Linnemann, Ulf, et al. "The Cadomian Orogen: Neoproterozoic to Early Cambrian crustal growth and orogenic zoning along the periphery of the West African Craton-Constraints from U-Pb zircon ages and Hf isotopes (Schwarzburg Antiform, Germany)." Precambrian Research 244 (2014): 236-278.
Meschede, M. and Warr, L.N., 2019. Late Paleozoic of Germany. In The Geology of Germany (pp. 63-114). Springer, Cham.
Murphy, J. Brendan, et al. "Comparative evolution of the Iapetus and Rheic Oceans: a North America perspective." Gondwana Research 17.2-3 (2010): 482-499.
Murphy, J.B., Waldron, J.W., Schofield, D.I., Barry, T.L. and Band, A.R., 2014. Highly depleted isotopic compositions evident in Iapetus and Rheic Ocean basalts: implications for crustal generation and preservation. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 103(5), pp.1219-1232.
Schulmann, K., Lexa, O., Janoušek, V., Lardeaux, J.M. and Edel, J.B., 2014. Anatomy of a diffuse cryptic suture zone: An example from the Bohemian Massif, European Variscides. Geology, 42(4), pp.275-278.
Foto:
parkgeo.cz
openpress.usask.ca

[@ExpandingEarthResearch]

:)

[@ExpandingEarthResearch]

czcams.com/video/sDUotmpcDUA/video.html - start using the globe and try to create all reconstructions on it

[@vaclavsantolik5530]

Yes, paleoreconstructions on a 3D sphere are much more acurate. I was using just some maps published in scientific articles, I was not creating these recostructions by myself :)

[@ExpandingEarthResearch]

​@@vaclavsantolik5530 There exist no 'accurate' paleoreconstructions of plate tectonics on a 3D sphere. The most accurate is the expanding Earth model, based on GPS monitoring as well - plates do not move as proposed by plate tectonics.

[@ExpandingEarthResearch]

​@@vaclavsantolik5530 Stop thinking about the tiny Bohemian Massif with a little planetary significance and start thinking about the planet, the whole planet and how the whole planet could work. This could help you a lot. If you really believe in plate tectonics, start with your own full 3D sphere reconstructions.

[@vaclavsantolik5530]

@@ExpandingEarthResearch Hi, I´m sorry, I didn´t really understand the comment at first. Now I see what you mean. The expanding Earth model was a popular model for the explanation of the continental drift, before the plate-tectonic model has proved it wrong. Some key arguments like measurements of plate movement, subducting plates in mantle tomography, or paleomagnetism are summarized for example on wikipedia. Naturally, I am very interested in understanding the planet as a whole, that is why plate tectonics make sense to me. I am certainly not stuck on a single theory, I apreciate the spectrum of hypothesies, however, in science, your conclusions must be based on a complex set of arguments. Plate tectonics fit the arguments collected of the hundreds of years of research, while the expanding Earth theory picks just some and ignore other. That is typical for a conspirational theory, which the expanding Earth theory has become.