Edward Witten, ICM Lectures
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 06. 2020
- 3:00 String theory and Geometry (1986)
55:31 Gauge Theories and the Jones Polynomial (August 25, 1990)
1:52:44 On the work of Witten by Faddeev
Source: www.math.stonybrook.edu/Video...
The proceedings can be found here: www.mathunion.org/icm/proceed...
Pure genus at work.
This guy must have had a very unique childhood.
Thanks
Always wondered who that guy was using all-caps on the internets. Well, now we know.
What an absolute genius.
Thankyou
Both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature. (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. An artificial Christmas tree can hold the ornaments in place, but it is not a real tree.
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What did some of the old clockmakers use to store the energy to power the clock? Was it a string or was it a spring?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Fixing the Standard Model with more particles is like trying to mend a torn fishing net with small rubber balls, instead of a piece of twisted twine.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with some aspects of the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose, and the work of Eric Weinstein on “Geometric Unity”, and the work of Dr. Lisa Randall on the possibility of one extra spatial dimension? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if Quark/Gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks where the tubes are entangled? (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Charge" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Gluons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
=====================
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The production of the torus may help explain the “Symmetry Violation” in Beta Decay, because one end of the broken tube section is connected to the other end of the tube produced, like a snake eating its tail. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process, which is also found in DNA molecules. Could the production of multiple writhe cycles help explain the three generations of quarks and neutrinos? If the twist cycles increase, the writhe cycles would also have a tendency to increase.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. ( Mass=1/Length )
The “Electric Charge” of electrons or positrons would be the result of one twist cycle being displayed at the 3D-4D surface interface of the particle. The physical entanglement of twisted tubes in quarks within protons and neutrons and mesons displays an overall external surface charge of an integer number. Because the neutrinos do not have open tube ends, (They are a twisted torus.) they have no overall electric charge.
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms.
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist producing a twisted 3D/4D membrane. This topological Soliton model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
Awesome
his powerpoint skills are amazing!
That's MY AVATAR! I edited it out of the original painting by Fernando Botero years ago. It's not mine but I am largely responsible for it being an avatar. lmaoooo
What was the "elegant" lecture/paper by "Manim" (sp?) Witten alluded to around @41:50 and the paper presented by "Singer"(sp?) ... FOUND IT: it was Manin, Yu, "Quantum strings and algebraic curves" p.1286 of the Proceedings.
chatGPT
3! = 6 there, I just proved my genius, no need for any silly projectors
In which year this video has been recorded
1986
As it says at the end, 1990.
@@keithdow8327 thx.
The situation during 20th century theoretical physics, that we are all facing but not many realize or agree to accept, is that "theoretical physics cannot been done with only maths although maths have to be invoved ". That's why i describe 20th century as a lost century concerning theoretical physics...a huge lost of time, personally i put the blame to the 3 world wars and the bureaucratic organisation of research globally.
Unfortunately the same silly think is still on going...i will never lose not even one sec of my life studying string theory... but every now and then i watch some lectures just to get ungry...a very helpful emotion that boosts my research :-)
if it cannot be done with just maths, what’s the missing piece of theoretical physics?
@kashu
Whenever the origin is the experimental empirical data usually we (infer) end up with a silly phenomenology (like quantum mechanics). Otherwise we can start from an ad hoc mathematical structure make the calculations and (deduct) produce a nice fitting! (Standard model). As far as i know there is no other way. (A new way has to be invented).
Maths are unavoidable..thats the language....but the question is, what is physics about ?...if its for a living...i would rather be a fisherman :-).
you should still study string theory in order to understand why or how it is wrong, in the same way you should study eugenics for the same reason
" 20th century as a lost century concerning theoretical physics"
So, SR, GR, QM; no good to you?
Video in the stone age
Video quality yes but the minds of these men including witten are way beyond ours
The spark of any man’s mind that is not a madman is the electric of existence
Looks changed over the years... but the voice and tone did not haha.
I feel blessed to have the chance to hear these lectures. So 🍀 lucky, but how old are they? Do you know?
@@brendawilliams8062 this one dates back to abou the late 80s i think
@@Daniel-ih4zh I wish I could have known that much in the 80’s. Amazing
Greatest mind after Einstein
Einstein was a poor mind. The math for GR was developed by others not him.
@@Burevestnik9M730 Einstein single handedly invented all physics since 1905. Who gives a shit if he wasn't a mathematician.
@@mamourizd science is never an individual’s endeavor
@@Cosmalano yeah but using the argument of the group to dismiss the contributions of an individual and call them a "poor mind" is peak dishonesty.
@@Burevestnik9M730 nice of u that u managed to talk to such a genius
Anybody who thinks that Mickelson and Morley proved that Light Velocity is invariable should not be taken seriously.... and if they dedicated their career to String Theory then they should not even be mentioned.
String theory is a mathematical conjecture not a physics theory.
He's more of a mathematician than a physicist.
Anyone else here from Joe Rogan?
Nope.
Heck no!
Nope
No
No lol