@A Man Then don't fucking watch it? Let me guess, you are one of those people that have no art education, they know jakc shit about art history and in general can draw a stick figure at best? If you don't like it and like the same old thing done for a 1000 years then go ahead and don't watch this.
@Ted Wilson the stereotype of a snobby modern adt fan, or as peoole call it - an artist who has spent 4 years studying art history and knows every reason why modern art exists and why its so good and influential. You arent helping the stereotype of a person who knows nothing about art other than that Mona Lisa is popular
he paints with oil paints so water wouldnt do anything but roll of like water from a ducks back, most likely he is using a turpentine spirit to thin down the oil paint which can have quite the fumes and odor
They could do whatever expression y I did y still since the 60’s😂 btw my kids got it too but more into technical side but they started since small say preK middle y HS y college ( me, stuck to my own natural I got fr my father)
its art. thank god we are not stuck with the need of boring pictorial representation. if I want to see a cow on a wall, I can just take a photo and print it out.
Art - "the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power." Art is decoration you dumbass
they look like a local/british brand, I don't know it. In a different video for the watercolors someone argues he is using da vinci brushes. For this one I think his brushes has animal hair, since synthetic ones do not react very well with so much terpentine after a while.
Ikea has been selling this type of brushstrokes for years, after Richter this guy just pops out calling himself an artist and talking about fragility, please - if you are selling this trash to your circle of rich dumb friends dont post it on social media. Its an offense for other artists that take art to a whole new level! In this industry there are only two types of people, true artist and the charlatan....this type of painting dates back to jackson pollock and way before it is not even consider contemporary anymore if it was achieved during the 90s I would consider a great work of art although this is not the case and it doesn`t show anything new to the public or to the history of contemporary art... Furthermore, contemporary is nowadays a myth even the word itself so dont consider this type of charlatan even a contemporary.
@@mrincognitoman ridiculous is buying a few tubes of paint and rub it on canvas and then sell it at sothebies for 65 million dollars. There`s no thought during or after the process of making. New graduates throughout their studies made this type of experiment multiple times. A ficticious market value!
Today's art sales seem to be at the mercy of how much drugs are in the system of the "highest" bidder. I used to cringe hard at the "art" with sold stickers on them for thousands of dollars. Like imagine the top 3rd of a canvas in solid golden mustard yellow, the bottom 3rd baby blue and three circles made with out of the tube ivory black left to right. To me it was the stupidest POS I've ever seen in my life. Each piece $3000 and all three with sold stickers. I simply couldn't believe my eyes. Today I realise love is in the eye of the beholder and it's as simple as that. And even though it looked like about 30 minutes of work at best, at the core I was jealous lol. So I'm thinking perhaps I should follow suit? Sell myself to the devil? I don't know if I can do it. But my wallet says try it. Barf.....
@@anatoos240 as I stated love is in the eye of the beholder...and as for me not being able to tell what good art is, well perhaps I shoild take a shit on canvas and slap a $20K price tag on it hahaha, it would probably sell!
@@jonathanroberts4615 You would have a more nuanced conception of art if you had. I'm not a fan of Innes' paintings myself, but making a broad, generalized comparison between his work (former Turner Prize nominee) and some cheap abstract you once saw, and summarizing it all as "todays art" shows ignorance at best.
![[The Korean Artist] 이진우 작가 (Lee Jinwoo) - 'calme' / ENG](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/A-QqhLSwe0A/mqdefault.jpg)
I like this. So relaxing and beautiful.
STUNNING!
Wonderful work!
stick a canvas on the wall behind the painting! Those splashes of color on the wall are pretty nice
So beautiful!
Very well drafted👍
found a gig, ran with it .. the art world liked it .. bucks followed .. luck, karma, who knows ..
check out a catalogue of him. you can see his process, how he ended up doing this. its rather interesting.
KARMA. GOD. YOU ARE GOD. YOU TOOK CHARGE. I'M GUESSING YOUR AN INSPIRATION! intended capitals.
Bollox contrived scene bollox even the language is elitist twaddle. But fair play. I'd love a gig like that.
@A Man Then don't fucking watch it? Let me guess, you are one of those people that have no art education, they know jakc shit about art history and in general can draw a stick figure at best? If you don't like it and like the same old thing done for a 1000 years then go ahead and don't watch this.
@Ted Wilson the stereotype of a snobby modern adt fan, or as peoole call it - an artist who has spent 4 years studying art history and knows every reason why modern art exists and why its so good and influential. You arent helping the stereotype of a person who knows nothing about art other than that Mona Lisa is popular
You can't describe abstract art. You shouldn't. Its a relaxation for spectator's brain
You can't descrive art.
Beautiful! I wonder what he's using to strip the paint off the canvas like that. I noticed he's wearing a mask, so I assume it's not just water 🤔
he paints with oil paints so water wouldnt do anything but roll of like water from a ducks back, most likely he is using a turpentine spirit to thin down the oil paint which can have quite the fumes and odor
terpentine, a common oil paint thinner
@@sekritdokumint9326 white spirit ?
at 0:52 you can see big jugs of probably turpentine
Very beautiful
Beautiful
Amazing
I dont know. Playing with color? But with a accurate Tecnic. But i have my Problem when i dont see painting.
Sir get a big rollere and a robot to roll it. simple
They could do whatever expression y I did y still since the 60’s😂 btw my kids got it too but more into technical side but they started since small say preK middle y HS y college ( me, stuck to my own natural I got fr my father)
👌👌👌👌
window cleaning
#hamparte (?)
Wall peint, distemper and emulation making video sent
You are a Genius, no You don't , just kidding 😂
Human fragility??? Not buying it. Asymmetry just looks nice.
Good decoration work.
Let's not confuse with art
Such a pretentious comment. 🙄
Of course it's art.
its art. thank god we are not stuck with the need of boring pictorial representation. if I want to see a cow on a wall, I can just take a photo and print it out.
A Man you're old don't speak anymore, you'll never change perspectives just shut it you geyser
@@iliveinarichgirlsdream human fragility JAJAJAJAJAJAJ , this kind of "artist" are distroying the art
Art - "the expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power."
Art is decoration you dumbass
wait it done?
Leonardo is alive!
What brush is that
A paint brush
they look like a local/british brand, I don't know it. In a different video for the watercolors someone argues he is using da vinci brushes.
For this one I think his brushes has animal hair, since synthetic ones do not react very well with so much terpentine after a while.
Omega , Lascaux , Davi Ci
Ikea has been selling this type of brushstrokes for years, after Richter this guy just pops out calling himself an artist and talking about fragility, please - if you are selling this trash to your circle of rich dumb friends dont post it on social media. Its an offense for other artists that take art to a whole new level! In this industry there are only two types of people, true artist and the charlatan....this type of painting dates back to jackson pollock and way before it is not even consider contemporary anymore if it was achieved during the 90s I would consider a great work of art although this is not the case and it doesn`t show anything new to the public or to the history of contemporary art... Furthermore, contemporary is nowadays a myth even the word itself so dont consider this type of charlatan even a contemporary.
this is a ridiculous response.
@@mrincognitoman ridiculous is buying a few tubes of paint and rub it on canvas and then sell it at sothebies for 65 million dollars. There`s no thought during or after the process of making. New graduates throughout their studies made this type of experiment multiple times. A ficticious market value!
Today's art sales seem to be at the mercy of how much drugs are in the system of the "highest" bidder.
I used to cringe hard at the "art" with sold stickers on them for thousands of dollars. Like imagine the top 3rd of a canvas in solid golden mustard yellow, the bottom 3rd baby blue and three circles made with out of the tube ivory black left to right. To me it was the stupidest POS I've ever seen in my life. Each piece $3000 and all three with sold stickers. I simply couldn't believe my eyes. Today I realise love is in the eye of the beholder and it's as simple as that. And even though it looked like about 30 minutes of work at best, at the core I was jealous lol.
So I'm thinking perhaps I should follow suit? Sell myself to the devil? I don't know if I can do it. But my wallet says try it. Barf.....
Yeah no you're not gonna sell shit. Your inability to tell wheter a contemporary painting is good or not is not an argument against it...
@@anatoos240 as I stated love is in the eye of the beholder...and as for me not being able to tell what good art is, well perhaps I shoild take a shit on canvas and slap a $20K price tag on it hahaha, it would probably sell!
@@jonathanroberts4615 tell yourself that, when you haven't opened an art history book in your entire life.
@@anatoos240 gosh, you know me so well.
@@jonathanroberts4615 You would have a more nuanced conception of art if you had.
I'm not a fan of Innes' paintings myself, but making a broad, generalized comparison between his work (former Turner Prize nominee) and some cheap abstract you once saw, and summarizing it all as "todays art" shows ignorance at best.
You are confusing décor with actual art painting master technique - even a house painter can do better HAHA