2022 Toyota Tundra TRD Pro - MPG Test | Real-world Highway Fuel Economy [Hybrid iForce Max]
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 12. 2022
- Two turbos and an electric motor help the all-new Toyota Tundra iForce Max achieve impressive power numbers. Unfortunately, it still takes a lot of fuel to move this big truck down the road, and mpg figures aren't as great as you might hope.
Become a DM Member and get access to special content including custom sound tests and vehicle requests!
/ @dailymotor
Speeding ticket? Use Off the Record to get your ticket dropped! Code "Daily Motor" to support the channel! off-the-record.sjv.io/c/28901...
More Tundra: www.youtube.com/@DailyMotor/s...
Check out DM Sound for audio reviews: / @dailymotorsound
Check out our website for written reviews and content: thedailymotor.com
Music and graphics by Skyler Benn.
This video was filmed with in-ear, binaural microphones, so if you listen with headphones, it will sound like you're sitting in the driver's seat!
#tundra #mpg #toyota #cars #hybrid - Auta a dopravní prostředky
Thanks for the vid
Charlie, With this drivetrain, the boys and girls at Toyota Motor Corporation have proven they can add a heck of a lot of power to the Tundra. I would like to see them come back with another drivetrain option that adds a heck of a lot of fuel efficiency for owners who can survive without 400+ horsepower. Are you running this test on winter blend gas?
its probably winter blend, if its 40degrees already im sure gas stations already have winter blend
EPA is also done at 50 to 55 (hwy speeds) would love to see interstate speed (70-80) instead as that is what a maof people see
Thanks @Matthew… Toyota says the hybrid is for more power. A pickup is not a Prius. All the major brands seem to get about the same mpg.
I am guessing the truck has very low miles on it. The truck is not broken in yet. There are a couple videos out with higher mileage tundra getting into the low 20’s.
My 2022 Sequoia TRD Pro 5.7L V8 with 34 inch A/T tires and in fulltime 4Hi (which this truck doesn't have) has averaged 13.5L/100km (17.4mpg) over 5000miles of highway driving spread over Feb 22 til now including Canadian winter driving at temps down to -35C.
No you didnt lol.
@@jakemiller1868 you're funny
@@jakemiller1868I have a 2018 tundra getting 17-18 mpg.
@@sebastiansaxon that's a point that I can't understand....what for they changed engine to "smaller" so they have to add turbo ? At the end we have engine that will last much shorter ,mostly because of turbo and SAME fuel efficiency with v8 that can last forever 😂
I have a 2022 Toyota Tundra Crewmax Limited Hybrid.
When the truck is running, the left side of the dash gives you an Average L/100KM.
When I shut the truck off, I see a Fuel Economy reading.
The best I've seen was
8L/100KM. Yes 8 Litres per 100km.
I noticed this when the truck had approximately 3/4 of a tank.
I decided to top it off with 92 octane just because. I drove it home (city driving) 10 minute drive. I shut the truck off and got a reading of 8L/100KM.
Doesn't make sense to me either.
That was your best during that stretch of driving probably coasting downhill, not your average, most new vehicles have this option.
17.5m/gal I would take that day in day out. I have a tacoma right now and Im averaging just about that or probably a little bit lower than that.
What’s disappointing about a truck that’s not even broken in yet getting 18mpg. I’ve seen other reviews also and they gotten close to 20 mpg or more. I have a 2021 ram limited night edition with 5.7 etorque and the most I’ve gotten was 18 mpg and that was a drive from Nebraska to Texas not a 100 mile drive. Also the ram has way less power and less torque. Ram 395hp and 410 lb-ft of torque this new tundra has 437hp and 583lb-ft of torque. But I still love my ram, but I’m also thinking of buying this new tundra while keeping my ram also. I also had a 2018 Chevy with the 5.3 ended up trade it for the ram cause it was having problems with only less then 30,000 miles on it. I don’t even consider the new f-150 cause every time I look at it from the front it looks like a freaking Asian carp.
The biggest difference is the Tundra has more HP and torque at the same MPG, not to mention long term value and dependability.
It begs the question how much is like 5MPG worth to you as our chevy suburbans' with v8s both built around 2003 get solidly 15MPG.
well to answer that question, how much HP and torque does your Chevy Suburban put out? ehhh not even close so I would take that 5mpg difference with a higher HP and torque
I don't know why people think a block going through the air supposed to get good MPG I don't care if it's a hybrid or not it's shaped like two blocks of cheese 🧀 😂🤷🏾♂️ as is most pickup trucks so it's just not going to get good gas mileage you know the EPA is coming down hard so they had to get rid of the V8 for the twin turbo V6 that's the only reason it's in there....
But I like the video keep doing the mpg test it gives people idea of what they future vehicle might get as far as mileage go
But it has active air dam and 2 different wings and side wings in tail lights and mirrors to help they spent a lot of money and time hundreds of hours in the wind tunnel
I have heard from several owners and through friends of owners and they all say they are disappointed with the gas mileage from the new turbo tundra.
Pretty sure the EPA didn't test the Pro model, also Toyota themselves said the hybrid system isn't for fuel economy, but more for power.
fueleconomy.gov/feg/Find.do?action=sbs&id=45215
Getting 21.2 over 3600 miles in my 2020 3.5 f150
At 2:53 there’s a red warning just below the mph readout. Wonder what it was?
It said "Brake" and the automatic emergency braking kicked in.
@@DailyMotor ah, it must’ve sensed the traffic and restricted the throttle.
I'm pretty sure that was the PCA ( Pre collision assistance system). There have been many report from owners who experience near death situations where the system has something else in mind. This should be a recall.
You can turn it off with the push of a button but if you’re going to leave it on, you probably shouldn’t drive like a dick and jump out in front of big rigs 🥴
Easy the anti collision system of the Toyota safety sense
The tundra 2022 today is. Still has wind noise
18.4 at 70 mph wow thats actually pretty good so at like 60mph it should get like 20mpg
Except that's around what a chevy/Ford V8 built in the last 20 years would get you.
@@GreenBlueWalkthrough Except those vehicles produce more hydrocarbons which contribute to smog. It's not just MPG.
@@jagaro oh god another snowflake he’s comparing mpgs you softy
@@motexas9092 I own a '23 PRO...folks don't understand this engine.
@@jagaro the amount of smog vehicles produce barely makes a difference. So worse gas mileage with less smog is a wash
how do you know its toyotas speed wrong and not the phone gps? I tested my phone gps for speed in different brand vehicles and its never what the speedometer on cars shows. so its not just toyota, every manufacturer.
My 2014 Ram 1500 5.7 riding on black rhino rims (quite heavy) and an aggressive snow rated all terrain tire gets 18/19. I know the hybrid isn't for fuel economy but id still expect a brand new generation truck to be beating my Ram by at least 2mpg.
well your ram has 395hp at 410lb-ft torque vs. Tundra's 437hp at 537lb-ft torque and at the same MPG that's a big difference, ohhh not big it's HUGEEE
Lies my ram rebel 2017 5.7 only gives me 13.5 at best
@@janusecornelius so what's your point? It has more power than a 10 year old truck with an NA engine and has the same mpg but to get more power it needs turbos, a hybrid system with a battery. Power that 99% of people don't need with ALOT of expensive engine tech; that isn't impressive.
@@janusecornelius those numbers dont mean much when they are both rated about the same in every category "truck thing" that matters...
~18 mpg is actually pretty good
I got 13 mpg on my trd pro 2023 not happy
Damn that as bad as my 2011 trd pro v8
Did you use premium gas?
How many miles do you have on the truck
@@jeimmyhernandez962 late reply used both
@viperviper5 at the time of Comment posts which was 8 months ago under 500miles now 4000miles I got 16 mpg now.
My Nisan titan XD only get 14.5 averages if I go easy and use high test ! I’m disappointed my old ram 3500 dually got way better even hauling
Same highway fuel economy as a chevy 3500 dually Duramax.
My 22 trd pro does 13.4 mpg on the computer regardless of eco or sport, mixed town and highway driving. It’s definitely no better than my 2013 tundra v8.
My wife in her rx450h hybrid gets 24 mpg combined. Me driving i get 28 mpg. Something tells me its about how you drive too
My 2018 GMC 2500 HD Duramax Diesel gets 23 +mpg at 70 mph. Has way more power and towing numbers. Have had zero issues with the GMC in the past four years
There is an MPG test on this channel with the GMC Sierra 2500 HD Duramax and it did 18.8mpg...the test was done in 2WD mode, and it doesn't have "way more power".
And you can find on this channel an MPG test with the Sierra 1500 3.0 Duramax. He got only 23.4 mpg in 2WD mode... very poor fuel economy for a diesel in both cases!
@@Eugen-E Let’s hook up 15K pound trailers up to both trucks and pull up a steep long grade. No way will that Tundra outperform a Duramax/Allison 6.6
@@tycotoys There are such tests on TFLTruck Channel and it is called Ike Gauntlet. You can watch all of those videos and you can see that even on uphill towing diesel trucks with the same engine power are NOT always better than gasoline at fuel economy !
@@Eugen-E I still like Toyota vehicles, I also have a 2020 4R TRD ORP, but I went away from half ton trucks because they are not anywhere near as heavy duty as a 2500/250/3500. Wish Toyota would build a 3/4 ton truck, I had no choice but to make the switch to a domestic truck. The GMC 2500 has been 100% reliable after four years of ownership.
I have plenty of friends with gas powered Trucks and the diesel always beats the gas in MPG and power when we tow.
@@tycotoys I've seen on TFLTruck towing uphill with a Durango SRT (6.4L V8 with almost 500hp) and it had the same fuel consumption on that uphill section as a Titan XD 5.0 V8 diesel (towing the same weight) which has like 150hp less 🙂 The most fuel efficient half ton trucks are 3.0-liter diesels but they are economical just because they are also very underpowered...
I can say the same about passenger cars. Nowadays gas-powered cars have almost the same fuel consumption as a diesel with the same HP. Considering the fact that diesel costs more, it makes no sense in a lot of countries in the world. Not to mention the fact that they are more expansive to maintain.
You going almost 80 it's raining and it's a brick best mpg is at around 65 to 70 I have a tacoma and I get the 23 to 24 mpg on the highway
Hahaha, I get that (18 mpg) with my 2019 TRD PRO 5.7 V8. And, the sound from my exhaust is REAL.
This hybrid makes nearly 200lb ft more torque. And gets better mpg
I HAVE THE V6 TURBO MPG SUCKS 13.2 CITY
Underwhelming. Raptor ecoboost can get the same if not better mpg without a hybrid. Not sure what’s up with Toyota Lexus hybrids lately, but they all seem to be producing lower than expected mpg results…
I mean if you can afford either one gas prices shouldn't be an issue nor MPG...
@@jermainec2462 just seems like a waste of a hybrid. Sure you get more power/torque, but it’s offset by the weight of the batteries. At least with Ford’s Hybrid system, you get notably better mpg than the standard 3.5EB and the pro-power onboard system is genuinely useful.
@@jakes5530 well you know it's more than one way to skin a cat... Slapping a hybrid in a vehicle doesn't always equate to better fuel economy that's just what we're used to when we hear hybrid setup.... And like I say you can't be worried about fuel economy you just spent 60k LOL... And then I want you to take this into account all of these vehicles are new so the engines haven't been broken in yet I want to see what the fuel economy is later on down the road at 50 and 60,000 MI on the Ford and Toyota
@@jermainec2462 youre not wrong, hybrids dont always equate to more efficiency, they can be used for more power too... however, you end up paying more for the hybrid by about $3000 in the Tundra. The difference in real world performance b/w the Hybrid Tundra and non-hybrid twin turbo is negligible. Tow ratings, payload, 0-60, etc. are all essentially the same as the non-hybrid. Like I said, most of the performance gains are offset by the extra 500-700 lbs of batteries.
So in this case, if performance is about the same, and efficiency is about the same, the hybrid seems kind of pointless.
You also state that people who can afford 70k vehicles shouldnt care about mpg, but remember, most people who got wealthy did so by making smart financial decisions not by throwing money away. Also the difference between a $50k vehicle and a $70k vehicle is only a few hundred bucks more per month when financed. You'd be surprised what salaries can technically "afford" a $70k vehicle according to the bank.
So the fact that the Hybrid is the only engine choice in the TRD pro, which we know is a $3000 upcharge in non-TRD pro Tundras, and the fact that the upcharge doesnt equate to any real advantages in MPG nor performance, seems to me like pissing away money.
@@jakes5530 LOL you piss your money away when you bought a $70,000 pickup truck 😂😂😂😂😂...
Complaining about poor gas mileage on a truck is silly. Manufacturers make trucks to serve a work, towing, off-road or hauling purpose. The intent of this hybrid system is to produce additional torque; which it does pretty well from what I see. My 5.7l has 381hp/401tq and gets 13-15mpg. I haul ladders, tools and other equipment. A tundra with 437hp/583tq that gets any mpg increase is a good thing. Plus, I just watched it take a 3.5l raptor in the 1/4 mile 😜.
First
That’s pretty bad. Considering a v8 Chevy and Ram getting 22 highway. Ford beats them with mpg tho.
This tundra has been disappointing
do you know about tundras? this hybrid was NOT mean for fuel economy but for power. you want to spend 70k in a truck but want to save few cents in gas? I guess you cant afford the truck then...........
@@majerrahim the tundra is a let down
Chevy and Rams are using outdated pushrod engine systems. Tundra outlast all other brands proven to reach million miles at least two Tundra's. After 200k miles most of these trucks ended up in the junk yard or start to have all kinds of mechanical issues. Nice try but reality shows otherwise. When towing, they all do about the same mpg if not close against Tundras. People should get electric trucks to really save on gas.
@@joseorozco7069 the tundra was also using a pushrod v8… now it’s a v6
@@inforthewin3231 Pushrod engines systems (DOHC) for Toyota Tundra meaning not having pushrods at all just to clarify.
Thanks for the reply.
If u drove the truck at 55,60 it would’ve made the 20 mpg. Very poor review!
Do you drive 60 on the highway?
No one drives 60mph on a highway. Heck out here in AZ no one drives under 80mph.
They butchered this new tundra! I’ve been driving my crewmax since I bought in new in 2008. I was hyped for this new truck to come out for a new one…. I will not even consider buying one now after poor quality, shitty fuel mileage, bad looking appearance and I can’t stand the interior.
I have a 2023 Tundra it gets 14 mpg at best. Why so much B.S. out there.
This is a hybrid, seems like a waste of a hybrid system
the hybrid in the tundras was
NOT meant for fuel economy but for more power
@@majerrahimExactly toyota said themselves.
Until you drive it. It’s all about that instant torque. Toyota wasn’t aiming for economy.