0:00 TOO LOW TERRAIN! (Plays until first impact) 0:12 Copilot: Do we lower the gear? ATC: Aeroperu 603, Lima. 0:14 Pilot: But, What do we do with the gear? Don’t know that. 0:16 *First impact* 0:18 Copilot to ATC: We are impacting water!!! 0:20 Copilot: Pull it up!!! 0:21 TOO LOW TERRAIN! (Plays until the pilot said We are going to invert) 0:21 ATC: Go up, go up if it indicates pull up. 0:24 Pilot: I have it!!! 0:26 Copilot: Pull it!!! 0:29 Pilot: I have it!!! 0:31 Pilot: We are going to invert! 0:33 WHOOP WHOOP PU- 0:34 *impact*
The fact that he says “we’re going to invert” so calmly is so chilling along with the egpws blaring pull up, terrain, and then just the wooop wooop being cut off by the impact is just the cherry on top
At the time they hit the water on first impact, The engines were on idle. They pulled as hard as they could. Pilots were heavily overwhelmed. To keep your engines on idle in the air for so long whilst knowing your flight instruments are untrustworthy. Its inevitable you will be descending. Tragic collection of unfortunate events. RIP
@abdelkarimouzzine5671 Yes in theory. They were unaware of their position until they first hit the water. After the first hit the plane has bounced and started to invert. They had mere seconds before death. Its hard to pull of Toga in that time while the plane is not level.
@@FranVelvet138 mira en el avión hay unos sensores que le dan toda la información necesaria a los pilotos el punto es que en los sensores había una pieza de cinta que daba mal información a los pilotos lo que generó el choque
Es una pena que seas sarcástico. Si yo digo que era el papá de un amigo mío es cierto, y no tengo que darte ninguna explicación. Si no me crees...es tu problema.
John 3:16 King James Version 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Amen 🙏!!!!
En realidad tuvieron muy poco tiempo para asustarse, ellos volaban a ciegas pero aún nada era seguro, el problema llegó después del primer impacto en el ala y el impacto fatal habrán pasado solounos 8 a 10 segundos.
En un momento un pasajero dice ¡No pueden volar!, La culpa la tuvieron los que cambiaron la pintura por no quitarla, Y como iba a hacer una noche oscura el piloto no la vio pero la de sobre velocidad si funcionaba como la de [To low terrain]
Estamos impactando el agua!!! Dale pa arriba(too low terrain)atc: si le dice que marque para arriba tiene que ir arriba yo la tengo!! (Too lo terrain) too low terrain) (too low terrain)nos vamos a invertir (whoop whoop pull) (impacto en el agua) 🛬🛬🛬
El capitan Shereiber muy lindo me regalo varios cuadernillos para que pinte mi hijo en un vuelo a Venezuela, hace poco vote el autografo de el. Si me dolio mucho cuando murio. Si muy amable se me acerco y me empezo a conversar y ahi le conte que tenia un hijo y me regalo cositas para mi hijo Fritz el no pudo viajar a Venezuela solo fui yo.
@@bishop94z Especially the Ground Proximity, and the Stall Horn/Stick Shaker... If you also hear those 2, your absolutely dead. (Even though you can get out of a stall.)
In all the air accidents I've learned about, I've never seen one instance where the GPWS was wrong or faulty, but I have definitely seen numerous instances where the pilots ignored it. All I can say is that if I am ever in control of an aircraft and "too low terrain" sounds, you best believe I'm gonna push them throttles to full and pull up.
Piloto: pero como es posible que esta cosa vuele a esta velocidad?! Copiloto: estamos a 9700 pies y marca to low terrain!! Torre de control: cual es su altura? Piloto: 9700 pies Torre de control: está seguro??? Copiloto: dice 9700 pies y marca to low terrain Torre de control: verifique bien esa altitud no es posible que sea así Piloto: no se aquí solo es un mar de alarmas!!! Torre de control: que altitud verifican según si punto de vista????? Piloto: no lo sé,no se puede ver nada Piloto: espera,veo algo!! [Impacto con el agua] Copiloto:estamos impactando el agua!!!!!!! Piloto: DALE PARA ARRIBA!!!!!!! Copiloto: YA LO TENGO!!! PILOTO: QUE SUCEDE!! Copiloto: NOS ESTAMOS INVIRTIENDO!!!!!!!!! [PULL UP PULL UP] [CRASH]
They could have used other instruments that were correct such as radar altimeter or ADI (Attitude Direction Indicator) Those instruments were correct all the time ( too Low Terrain alarm for example) but because of poor training that companies provided at the time , they were not able to Control the plane Rip both of them
Why didn't anyone survive the crash? Were they too fast on impact? Were the forces too strong? Or did everyone drown because they didn't get off the plane?
El encargado del mantenimiento olvidó quitar la cinta adhesiva que había colocado en los tubos pitot del avión. Eso hizo que cuando comenzó a volar los instrumentos comenzaran a mostrar información completamente errónea y/o contradictoria, razón por la cual los pilotos quedaron confundidos sin saber qué estaba pasando y ni en qué instrumentos confiar. Por eso no se dieron cuenta que estaban descendiendo peligrosamente hasta que ya era tarde.
@@CosmicFoxbat Wow...pero ya murieron ya se fueron de este mundo, buscar razones o culpables ya no sirve de nada, supongo que sabes eso por la caja negra verdad?
@@Jcritics Hay un documental de todo este caso. Por cierto los juicios no resucitan a los muertos, pero sirven para sancionar la negligencia de algunos.
@@Jcritics No se sabe, pero se asume que fue la empresa de mantenimiento que trabajaba para Aeroperu en ese tiempo, encargada de realizar el mantenimiento a todas sus aeronaves, ya que actualmente la compañia de vuelo Aeroperu está quebrada si no me equivoco, dieron el quiebre económico precisamente luego de este accidente en el año 1996
Speedometer, altimeter, all instruments were off. The pilot was panicked by two conflicting alarms: overspeed alarm and stall alarm. However, they were false warnings due to a faulty pitot tube. They cooperated by getting data from air traffic controllers. But since the data was transmitted from the aircraft Even that was wrong. The only exception was the surface approach warning that was correct, which was a radio altimeter. But they were flying over the ocean at night, so they couldn't visually determine altitude. they didn't trust that data. Oh, what was I supposed to do in such a shitty situation? My prayers go out to those who lost their lives. R.I.P.
Pusieron toda la potencia para subir, pero el motor izquierdo se apagó por la ingesta del agua, eso sumado al daño estructural del ala izquierda hizo que toda la fuerza del motor derecho más la sustentación del ala derecha en buen estado invirtieran el avión
Why pilots didn't get to raise the aircraft after the first impact and they ended up inverted? Just a question, because, as ignorant in aviation, i didn't get why they give motors full speed and go up didn't solve the situation. I assume the first impact didn't break the wing... Probably i am wrong.
They were flying with low to no visitabilty and their instruments were faulty because it was covered up by tape. If I remember I think ATC gave them an impression that they were actually above clouds, when they hit water that's when they realized they were not at the attitude they were told but it was too late.
@@gelatinous6915 Physics still exists in the cockpit, the Captain quite literally states that the plane is going inverted right beforehand. You can feel what is up and down dude.
It's very difficult to understand what's going on when you have no visibility and no instruments. It's called spatial desorientation, and It has led many aviation accidents (like the helicopter of Kobe Bryant)
@@CableReadyTechnoSIut when they tried, the left motor stopped working cause the water that went into it when hitting, so when they pulled up, only right motor worked… RIP🙏
F/O: 기어를 낮출까요? Lima Approach: 공항 603, 리마. Capt.:하지만 장비로 무엇을 할까요? 몰라. (퍼스트 임팩트) F/O: 우리는 물에 영향을 미치고 있습니다! 당겨! Lima Approach: 위로 가다. 차를 세우라는 표시가 있으면 위로 가십시오. Capt.: 나는 그것을 가지고있다! F/O: 당겨! Capt.: 나는 그것을 가지고있다! (기내에서 비명을 지르는 승객들) Capt.:우리는 뒤집을 것입니다! (기내에서 비명을 지르는 승객들) (영향)
Aircraft can land on water safely but only if done right. That's why there are many success stories of water landings but also total crashes. In this case, the aircraft was banking and therefore, there was no hope to save the aircraft and land on the water. Some aircraft like the 777 have a cockpit button which considers ditching (water landing). There are many problems with ditchings though. Firstly, it's the high rate of failure. There have been many instances where the pilots could not land the aircraft properly (Ethiopian flight 961 for example). There are many reasons for this but most importantly, waves and winds at sea level can greatly increase the chances that the aircraft comes in at an angle therefore ripping its wings and fuselage on landing. Secondly, an aircraft water landing is the last resort to save the passengers and crew. This is because rescue is unlikely to be available endangering lives and an aircraft will quickly sink within a few minutes after the landing (it will then be a hull loss). Water landings are also very unlikely and you can probably count with your fingers how many water landings have occurred over the last 70 years. Therefore, there is no real reason to add many features designed for a water landing as its unlikely and very unsafe. I hope this answer helps :)
@@goldviationflights the industry is not interested in implementing security features just because the air crashes are rare. Why don't they make planes crash-resistant? The industry is only interested in protecting the black box, but not the entire plane. They run the fuel all over the plane and has the effect to start fire when the plane crash. They should develop something like an airbag for ditching and emergency landing on ground. They should make commercial plane able to do water landing by default like the small planes. They should build the planes with stronger material that can resist a crash.
Many instruments were failing and they thought the "too low terrain" warning was an error too, didn't know they were that close to water until they hit it
The pilot and copilot of this flight desperately fought to keep this plane going, they did all they could, they fought as hard or even more than you say you will
At the time they hit the water on first impact, The engines were on idle. They pulled as hard as they could. Didn't have TOGA ready in time before second impact.
In high-pressure and emergency situations like aircraft incidents, pilots must make split-second decisions based on their training, experience, and the information available to them. The scenario you've described, of dropping the plane near the ground and then taking off again, might seem like a possible solution, but there are several factors that make it extremely challenging and risky: 1. **Aircraft Performance:** Commercial airplanes are designed to operate within certain limits of speed, altitude, and load. Dropping a plane close to the ground and then attempting to take off again would require significant engine power and control to counteract the force of gravity. It's uncertain whether an airplane could generate enough lift in such a situation to safely regain altitude. 2. **Speed and Distance:** Aircraft need a certain amount of speed to generate lift. If the plane is close to the ground, there may not be enough distance to accelerate to a speed sufficient for takeoff. Attempting to climb too quickly could lead to a stall, where the wings lose lift and the aircraft can plummet. 3. **Terrain and Obstacles:** The decision to drop the plane near the ground and then take off again assumes that there is a clear, obstacle-free area available for the plane to descend and then climb. In many real-world scenarios, this might not be the case, especially in crowded or mountainous environments. 4. **Control and Stability:** Airplanes are designed to be stable in flight. Sudden and extreme maneuvers, like dropping the aircraft close to the ground and then attempting to climb steeply, can put immense stress on the airframe and may lead to loss of control. 5. **Limited Time and Information:** In an emergency, pilots have limited time to assess the situation, make decisions, and execute actions. The idea you've mentioned could require precise calculations and execution, which might not be feasible under the extreme stress of an imminent crash situation. 6. **Passenger Safety:** Rapid changes in altitude and maneuvers could lead to injuries among passengers and crew due to the sudden shifts in gravitational forces. Aviation professionals undergo extensive training to handle emergencies and make critical decisions to maximize the safety of passengers and crew. In many cases, pilots rely on established procedures and protocols developed by aviation authorities and manufacturers. While creative thinking is valuable, attempting complex and untested maneuvers in an emergency could potentially worsen the situation. It's important to remember that aviation safety is a complex and carefully regulated field, and decisions made by pilots are based on a combination of training, experience, and adherence to established safety protocols.
0:00 TOO LOW TERRAIN! (Plays until first impact)
0:12 Copilot: Do we lower the gear? ATC: Aeroperu 603, Lima.
0:14 Pilot: But, What do we do with the gear? Don’t know that.
0:16 *First impact*
0:18 Copilot to ATC: We are impacting water!!!
0:20 Copilot: Pull it up!!!
0:21 TOO LOW TERRAIN! (Plays until the pilot said We are going to invert)
0:21 ATC: Go up, go up if it indicates pull up.
0:24 Pilot: I have it!!!
0:26 Copilot: Pull it!!!
0:29 Pilot: I have it!!!
0:31 Pilot: We are going to invert!
0:33 WHOOP WHOOP PU-
0:34 *impact*
Woooo woooooo *dies*
The fact that he says “we’re going to invert” so calmly is so chilling along with the egpws blaring pull up, terrain, and then just the wooop wooop being cut off by the impact is just the cherry on top
What does that “WHOOP WHOOP” mean? Does it mean an impact is imminent?
@@micahbell4774 The whoop whoop means pull up the full alarm is WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP
@@jimk5840 Oh ok thank you. I just looked up the full alarm but it doesnt sound as unsettling as it did here because of the way it just cut off
All of this caused by an piece of duct tape.. heart breaking
Caused by *a piece of duct tape… get it right
@@buttermaster5621
If you’re going to correct the comment, you should also reply to the comment
@@buttermaster5621 It’s “Caused by,” by the way. Not “Cause by.”
_You_ get it right, since you’re being such a stickler for grammar.
@@buttermaster5621 You got google.
@@buttermaster5621I can tell ur a sad angry man just from that reply
At the time they hit the water on first impact, The engines were on idle. They pulled as hard as they could. Pilots were heavily overwhelmed. To keep your engines on idle in the air for so long whilst knowing your flight instruments are untrustworthy. Its inevitable you will be descending. Tragic collection of unfortunate events. RIP
That’s interesting man I was wondering if there was any way they could’ve avoided inverting it but that pretty much answers my question
Couldn’t they have gone full TOGA and pull up after they hit water?
@abdelkarimouzzine5671 Yes in theory. They were unaware of their position until they first hit the water. After the first hit the plane has bounced and started to invert. They had mere seconds before death. Its hard to pull of Toga in that time while the plane is not level.
@@TinyT1792the impact damaged the wing terribly
you can hear the over speed alarm going off
I'm from Chile... and it hits different when you hear this in your own language... 😢
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yes :,[
Yeah im also hearing this in my own language 😢
@Mikel and Daniel gaming 😍😍😍😍
@Mikel and Daniel gaming 🫡
All this because of a little piece of tape
@@FranVelvet138 mira en el avión hay unos sensores que le dan toda la información necesaria a los pilotos el punto es que en los sensores había una pieza de cinta que daba mal información a los pilotos lo que generó el choque
La única persona que fué a la cárcel fue una persona de mantenimiento que olvidó retirar cinta que cubria los puertos pitot.
La negligencia cayó directamente sobre el por utilizar cinta transparente en vez de el cobertor que llama a la vista
Imagine this is the flight you missed though.....
like the guy who got his ticket for the titanic stolen
@@mastrorick Exactly.
Me personally, I miss every flight for good measure.
@@bigjerm1631 You almost made me choke on my food... 😭😭😭
Funny you say that my grandapa was gonna be on plane too replace the pilot but the plane never arrived
Fue real. El piloto el Capitán Schreiber era el padre de un gran amigo mío. R.I.P.🙏
Mientes
Y mi papá es amigo de Messi
Es una pena que seas sarcástico. Si yo digo que era el papá de un amigo mío es cierto, y no tengo que darte ninguna explicación. Si no me crees...es tu problema.
John 3:16
King James Version
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Amen 🙏!!!!
@@reclusiarchgrimaldus1269 ¡Amén!🙏
first impact+ last impact sounded insane.
Es muy inquetante que los pilotos no esten asustados ni nada por el estilo , solo estan esperando su triste final!
En realidad tuvieron muy poco tiempo para asustarse, ellos volaban a ciegas pero aún nada era seguro, el problema llegó después del primer impacto en el ala y el impacto fatal habrán pasado solounos 8 a 10 segundos.
RIP
To the passengers and crew of Aeroperú Flight 603
This is the most terrifying audio I’ve heard
En un momento un pasajero dice ¡No pueden volar!, La culpa la tuvieron los que cambiaron la pintura por no quitarla, Y como iba a hacer una noche oscura el piloto no la vio pero la de sobre velocidad si funcionaba como la de [To low terrain]
I can’t believe how this accident was caused by a piece of tape
0:17 ¡ESTAMOS IMPACTANDO EL AWA!
🗿
AWA=water in a whole different language 😂
Dale "PA" arriba
Estamos impactando el agua!!! Dale pa arriba(too low terrain)atc: si le dice que marque para arriba tiene que ir arriba yo la tengo!! (Too lo terrain) too low terrain) (too low terrain)nos vamos a invertir (whoop whoop pull) (impacto en el agua) 🛬🛬🛬
Wow, that would be a stressful end.
2 de octubre 1996 , frente a la costa de chancay - Perú a pocos minutos del aeropuerto .
El capitan Shereiber muy lindo me regalo varios cuadernillos para que pinte mi hijo en un vuelo a Venezuela, hace poco vote el autografo de el. Si me dolio mucho cuando murio. Si muy amable se me acerco y me empezo a conversar y ahi le conte que tenia un hijo y me regalo cositas para mi hijo Fritz el no pudo viajar a Venezuela solo fui yo.
Porque boto el autografo?
I find this TAWS creepier than the others
The Scary Alert IS The TO LOW TERAIN! Alert
0:11
Especially the end, it sends me extreme chills down my spine...
It's just the:
**Radio Altimeter** "Whoop, Whoop, Pull-" **Impact**
For me.
Indeed. It's so hectic.
Personally, I fear the bank angle warning more.
@@bishop94z Especially the Ground Proximity, and the Stall Horn/Stick Shaker... If you also hear those 2, your absolutely dead. (Even though you can get out of a stall.)
That sound Woop Woop pull up is so scary sound for pilots
Imagine looking out your window to see the wingtip skimming the water 😳
☠️
Thanks for the jumpscare at the end
It wasn’t a jumpscare br
But its white screen
me gusto mucho el video! like!
Q horrible morir así😩😩sólo Dios sabe. Ojalá estén en un mejor lugar descansando en paz.🙏🙏
Good thing they arrested the person who made the plane crash
@@artyjaycayairlines It didnt maked it. It was an error.
WHOOP WHOOP PULL *impacto*😢
In all the air accidents I've learned about, I've never seen one instance where the GPWS was wrong or faulty, but I have definitely seen numerous instances where the pilots ignored it. All I can say is that if I am ever in control of an aircraft and "too low terrain" sounds, you best believe I'm gonna push them throttles to full and pull up.
Piloto: pero como es posible que esta cosa vuele a esta velocidad?!
Copiloto: estamos a 9700 pies y marca to low terrain!!
Torre de control: cual es su altura?
Piloto: 9700 pies
Torre de control: está seguro???
Copiloto: dice 9700 pies y marca to low terrain
Torre de control: verifique bien esa altitud no es posible que sea así
Piloto: no se aquí solo es un mar de alarmas!!!
Torre de control: que altitud verifican según si punto de vista?????
Piloto: no lo sé,no se puede ver nada
Piloto: espera,veo algo!!
[Impacto con el agua]
Copiloto:estamos impactando el agua!!!!!!!
Piloto: DALE PARA ARRIBA!!!!!!!
Copiloto: YA LO TENGO!!!
PILOTO: QUE SUCEDE!!
Copiloto: NOS ESTAMOS INVIRTIENDO!!!!!!!!!
[PULL UP PULL UP] [CRASH]
Estamos impactando en agua
Nos vamos a invertir
eso es lo correcto
me da una pena..... 😔
@@Nebulousss un caso muy triste
@@Avation_worldNo.
Mano Do Ceu, Tava Muito Alto Esse WHOOP WHOOP PULL UP!
What's this documentary? Given the 9Now logo it seems to have aired first in Australia.
Sad
Hola, qué simulador usaste?
I got u to 1k
If only they pulled up.....
Why did he got inverted before the impact?
0:32
0:32
that very lOuD alarm gave me a heart attack
0:33
They were “blind flying”
Yes, poor people
They could have used other instruments that were correct such as radar altimeter or ADI (Attitude Direction Indicator)
Those instruments were correct all the time ( too Low Terrain alarm for example) but because of poor training that companies provided at the time , they were not able to Control the plane
Rip both of them
@@martim7605
They don’t know if they should trust the basic air data, or the warnings
...
mhhh
@@artyjaycayairlines If you pull up you will not explode.
At least the victims didn't know until it happened 😢
"Whoop whoop pull-"
0:33 most quiet Master alert
Last alarm: WHOOP WHOOP, PUL-
Xq se quizo invertir estando cerca del terreno?
I can't believe a tape caused the plane to crash
Yes. But the tape was not to blame, it was maintenance who was responsible for the tape.
My cousin died on this flight, he was only 21
Rest in pace
@@enzolunardelli8701 Much appreciated
@@Sinkatze My condolences. 😢💔
@@StephenLuke Thank you
Did they flip over cuz they stalled? I know the problem. It was caused by a piece of tape on one of the planes most important centres
They flip over because they don't know their position
Dale pa arriba
Why didn't anyone survive the crash? Were they too fast on impact? Were the forces too strong? Or did everyone drown because they didn't get off the plane?
Maybe the speed of the impact
@@enzolunardelli8701
yep, you can hear the overspeed warning in the background
Even if they did somehow survive they would’ve been seriously injured and would’ve most likely drowned.
This is a terrifying way to go.
Actually investigations said most of passagers died of drowning
RIP
Sobrevivientes en total:0
Fallecidos en total:70
Soy de Perú🇵🇪
Aeroperu Flight 603 - Fjord International Airport, Ransanus Airport
❤
aeroperu 603 declaramos emergencia
0:34 OH OH OH OH OH OH . . . OH OH OH OH OH! OH. . . OH OH OH OH OH OH . . . OH OH OH OH OH! OH we are in haven
Seriously. 😭
yes for real@@itzl2124
Would this have been significantly easier for the pilots if it was daylight?
Yeah
If only they recovered after the first water impact…
It quite impossible
Their wing was fucked after that.
que impotencia habran sentido los pilotos al no poder elevar el avion
😔
(Se estrellaron por controles dañados o que fue?)
El encargado del mantenimiento olvidó quitar la cinta adhesiva que había colocado en los tubos pitot del avión. Eso hizo que cuando comenzó a volar los instrumentos comenzaran a mostrar información completamente errónea y/o contradictoria, razón por la cual los pilotos quedaron confundidos sin saber qué estaba pasando y ni en qué instrumentos confiar. Por eso no se dieron cuenta que estaban descendiendo peligrosamente hasta que ya era tarde.
@@CosmicFoxbat
Wow...pero ya murieron ya se fueron de este mundo, buscar razones o culpables ya no sirve de nada, supongo que sabes eso por la caja negra verdad?
@@Jcritics Hay un documental de todo este caso.
Por cierto los juicios no resucitan a los muertos, pero sirven para sancionar la negligencia de algunos.
@@CosmicFoxbat
Y sabes quien fue el irresponsable?
O fue como tal un descuido?
@@Jcritics No se sabe, pero se asume que fue la empresa de mantenimiento que trabajaba para Aeroperu en ese tiempo, encargada de realizar el mantenimiento a todas sus aeronaves, ya que actualmente la compañia de vuelo Aeroperu está quebrada si no me equivoco, dieron el quiebre económico precisamente luego de este accidente en el año 1996
BOOM
WHOOP! WHOOP!!! PULL-
Speedometer, altimeter, all instruments were off.
The pilot was panicked by two conflicting alarms: overspeed alarm and stall alarm.
However, they were false warnings due to a faulty pitot tube.
They cooperated by getting data from air traffic controllers.
But since the data was transmitted from the aircraft
Even that was wrong.
The only exception was the surface approach warning that was correct, which was a radio altimeter.
But they were flying over the ocean at night, so they couldn't visually determine altitude.
they didn't trust that data.
Oh, what was I supposed to do in such a shitty situation?
My prayers go out to those who lost their lives.
R.I.P.
Rip My airline cause I from Lima Peru
Fuerza bro
Hola enzoo
0:33 WHOOP WHOOP PU-
0:34 *IMPACT*
Nightmare fuel
Subtitles for video beobeobeo to low terrain 2x pilot says to low terain beobeo x2 atc says pilot says brep brep brep whoo whoo pull up
0:16
Whoop Whoop Puuu-
The worst thing is that the passengers died by drowning
How /why did the aircraft invert?
the wing hit the water and broke, causing the plane to flip
What was wrong with their engines and flight surfaces?
Instrument failure
Que fuerte :/
0.00 TOWW LOW TREEAIN
Too low terr-ain Too low terr-ain
0:33
I not afraid too low terrain😨
esto es monetizable?
Todavia no
Nos vamos a Invertir....😢😢😢😢😢😢
0:18 I like when the pilot said “WE ARE IMPACTING THE WATER” But in Spanish lol But rip plane and people…
A
A?
Rip
cuz they're from spanish
@@dariootero5579What? No.
Why did the plane invert? They weren’t stalling and had the speed to climb
Be cause the wing hit the water and got important damages
Their instrument malfunction
They were stalling you can't hear it but if you searched up the longer version you can here they were stalling
@@Peanutbutterlover12 They didnt.
@@randoom1539 they did
02/10/1996
MY EYE AT 0:35
👺
Alguien sabe porque se invirtieron ? fue una mala maniobra debido a la velocidad que iban ?
Hicieron una maniobra brusca al intentar subir el morro del avión causando que se inviertan
Pusieron toda la potencia para subir, pero el motor izquierdo se apagó por la ingesta del agua, eso sumado al daño estructural del ala izquierda hizo que toda la fuerza del motor derecho más la sustentación del ala derecha en buen estado invirtieran el avión
What error there’s in that plane
a piece of tape on a little hole that it’s crucial to know the altitude and speed of the airplane
Why pilots didn't get to raise the aircraft after the first impact and they ended up inverted? Just a question, because, as ignorant in aviation, i didn't get why they give motors full speed and go up didn't solve the situation. I assume the first impact didn't break the wing... Probably i am wrong.
They were flying with low to no visitabilty and their instruments were faulty because it was covered up by tape. If I remember I think ATC gave them an impression that they were actually above clouds, when they hit water that's when they realized they were not at the attitude they were told but it was too late.
@@declaringpond2276 also it damaged the flaps so there is a chance it can be a uncontrollable bank depending with wing you striked
To low terrain to low terrain to low terrain to low terrain to low terrain to low terrain to low terrain to low terrain woop woop pull
The end
Soy R
Why not just pull up? Afraid to hit the ceiling?
They had zero working instruments, and it was pitch dark. They didnt know which way was up.
@@gelatinous6915 Physics still exists in the cockpit, the Captain quite literally states that the plane is going inverted right beforehand. You can feel what is up and down dude.
It's very difficult to understand what's going on when you have no visibility and no instruments. It's called spatial desorientation, and It has led many aviation accidents (like the helicopter of Kobe Bryant)
@@CableReadyTechnoSIut when they tried, the left motor stopped working cause the water that went into it when hitting, so when they pulled up, only right motor worked… RIP🙏
@@ruggiofficialWhy they didnt pull up before?
F/O: 기어를 낮출까요?
Lima Approach: 공항 603, 리마.
Capt.:하지만 장비로 무엇을 할까요? 몰라.
(퍼스트 임팩트)
F/O: 우리는 물에 영향을 미치고 있습니다! 당겨!
Lima Approach: 위로 가다. 차를 세우라는 표시가 있으면 위로 가십시오.
Capt.: 나는 그것을 가지고있다!
F/O: 당겨!
Capt.: 나는 그것을 가지고있다!
(기내에서 비명을 지르는 승객들)
Capt.:우리는 뒤집을 것입니다!
(기내에서 비명을 지르는 승객들)
(영향)
Why in Korean???
yeah
Thank u for the translation!
Alguien de Perú que recuerde eso?
0:33 WHOOP WHOOP PUL- putaz0*
Why airplanes are not designed to swim or at least to land on water ?
Aircraft can land on water safely but only if done right. That's why there are many success stories of water landings but also total crashes. In this case, the aircraft was banking and therefore, there was no hope to save the aircraft and land on the water. Some aircraft like the 777 have a cockpit button which considers ditching (water landing).
There are many problems with ditchings though. Firstly, it's the high rate of failure. There have been many instances where the pilots could not land the aircraft properly (Ethiopian flight 961 for example). There are many reasons for this but most importantly, waves and winds at sea level can greatly increase the chances that the aircraft comes in at an angle therefore ripping its wings and fuselage on landing. Secondly, an aircraft water landing is the last resort to save the passengers and crew. This is because rescue is unlikely to be available endangering lives and an aircraft will quickly sink within a few minutes after the landing (it will then be a hull loss). Water landings are also very unlikely and you can probably count with your fingers how many water landings have occurred over the last 70 years. Therefore, there is no real reason to add many features designed for a water landing as its unlikely and very unsafe.
I hope this answer helps :)
@@goldviationflights Thank you , i understand .
@@goldviationflights Awesome explanation, thanks.
@@Fall_Bondler :)
@@goldviationflights the industry is not interested in implementing security features just because the air crashes are rare.
Why don't they make planes crash-resistant? The industry is only interested in protecting the black box, but not the entire plane. They run the fuel all over the plane and has the effect to start fire when the plane crash.
They should develop something like an airbag for ditching and emergency landing on ground. They should make commercial plane able to do water landing by default like the small planes. They should build the planes with stronger material that can resist a crash.
was this a canon event?
Yes 🚬🗿
@@enzolunardelli8701 💀
@@Gregory_ferrandis🚬😽💨
Why didn't the pilot make a water landing?
the wing hit the water and broke, causing the plane to flip
@@enzolunardelli8701 Could be pilot failure
@@YEETEER probably
Many instruments were failing and they thought the "too low terrain" warning was an error too, didn't know they were that close to water until they hit it
NOOOOOO
Si
Yes
:(
Por que all personas de estados unidos pero el avion es de peru
If I was the captain of that plane I would be fighting that plane so hard that the entire yoke I would have took off
The pilot and copilot of this flight desperately fought to keep this plane going, they did all they could, they fought as hard or even more than you say you will
u cant skip death weak human
Dawg they didn’t know where they were. They had no way to they needed to pull up. They didn’t know which instruments to trust.
At the time they hit the water on first impact, The engines were on idle. They pulled as hard as they could. Didn't have TOGA ready in time before second impact.
look, if you don't know better don't comment 😒
Context?
The aircraft crash due to duct tape covering the pitot tube
@@iliashamid8765 bruh sad
@@kirbydr.argentina8135 all because of piece of duct tape
Que buenooooo :DDDD
الله
Como que bueno?
lol
👎
Ho no arupoerto de peru
🇵🇪
1200 IQ people: why captain doesnt drop the plane after plane is almost crash then take off again, it will save all passengers and captain
In high-pressure and emergency situations like aircraft incidents, pilots must make split-second decisions based on their training, experience, and the information available to them. The scenario you've described, of dropping the plane near the ground and then taking off again, might seem like a possible solution, but there are several factors that make it extremely challenging and risky:
1. **Aircraft Performance:** Commercial airplanes are designed to operate within certain limits of speed, altitude, and load. Dropping a plane close to the ground and then attempting to take off again would require significant engine power and control to counteract the force of gravity. It's uncertain whether an airplane could generate enough lift in such a situation to safely regain altitude.
2. **Speed and Distance:** Aircraft need a certain amount of speed to generate lift. If the plane is close to the ground, there may not be enough distance to accelerate to a speed sufficient for takeoff. Attempting to climb too quickly could lead to a stall, where the wings lose lift and the aircraft can plummet.
3. **Terrain and Obstacles:** The decision to drop the plane near the ground and then take off again assumes that there is a clear, obstacle-free area available for the plane to descend and then climb. In many real-world scenarios, this might not be the case, especially in crowded or mountainous environments.
4. **Control and Stability:** Airplanes are designed to be stable in flight. Sudden and extreme maneuvers, like dropping the aircraft close to the ground and then attempting to climb steeply, can put immense stress on the airframe and may lead to loss of control.
5. **Limited Time and Information:** In an emergency, pilots have limited time to assess the situation, make decisions, and execute actions. The idea you've mentioned could require precise calculations and execution, which might not be feasible under the extreme stress of an imminent crash situation.
6. **Passenger Safety:** Rapid changes in altitude and maneuvers could lead to injuries among passengers and crew due to the sudden shifts in gravitational forces.
Aviation professionals undergo extensive training to handle emergencies and make critical decisions to maximize the safety of passengers and crew. In many cases, pilots rely on established procedures and protocols developed by aviation authorities and manufacturers. While creative thinking is valuable, attempting complex and untested maneuvers in an emergency could potentially worsen the situation.
It's important to remember that aviation safety is a complex and carefully regulated field, and decisions made by pilots are based on a combination of training, experience, and adherence to established safety protocols.