Vladimir Putin surprised at no ‘tough questions’ from Tucker Carlson
Vložit
- čas přidán 14. 02. 2024
- Russian president Vladimir Putin has said he is grateful to the rightwing US television host Tucker Carlson for his interview last week, but was surprised by a lack of 'tough questions'.
Subscribe to Guardian News on CZcams ► bit.ly/guardianwiressub
Putin told the Russian TV presenter Pavel Zarubin on Wednesday that he had wanted Carlson to behave more aggressively, which would have given him the right to reply just as pointedly.
The former Fox News star released a two-hour interview with Putin in Moscow on Thursday last week which made headlines around the world.
Putin says he prefers Biden to Trump and mocks Tucker Carlson’s questions ► www.theguardian.com/world/202...
The Guardian publishes independent journalism, made possible by supporters. Contribute to The Guardian today ► bit.ly/3uhA7zg
Sign up to the Guardian's free new daily newsletter, First Edition ► theguardian.com/first-edition
Website ► www.theguardian.com
Facebook ► / theguardian
Twitter ► / guardian
Instagram ► / guardian
The Guardian on CZcams:
The Guardian ► bit.ly/guardiannewssubs
Guardian Australia ► bit.ly/guardianaussubs
Guardian Football ► bit.ly/gdnfootballsubs
Guardian Sport ► bit.ly/gdnsportsubs
Guardian Live ► bit.ly/guardianlivesubs
#VladimirPutin #Russia #Ukraine #TruckerCarlson #News #Media
Tucker had ro keep it simple for the American people to understand
Or the carlson's audience, which is simple by self selection.
Simple questions for simple people 😅
@@tentringer4065 well maybe, but definetly no more than voters of Biden ;) hey from Europe.
Absolutely
@@tentringer4065 He said americans, why you double down? Or it was not simple enough for you?
"A dangerous person" in Russian - is a person who is smart first of all. Determined, competent. It's a compliment to Tucker, there is no negative connotation in these words.
Ok i will tell him. Thank you for your analysis.
Now I get all the Soviet history.
Putin looks relieved not having to debate.
@@ragas2845you don't know any famous person so
cope is hard😂
Who expected the Guardian to actually translate the words of a President correctly? 😂
Just image how Russians watched this interview. Putin says in Russian, then it is translated to English and after that it translated from to English to Russian again. Hopefully he said about Russian or Ukrainian history (which are the same) for about 30 minutes and so it is not need to listening this school knowledge.
@@dmitry6135 Yeah, it was distracting sometimes, your brain switches between languages, you understand nothing and have to rewind, lol. Wish there were a bilingual fully untranslated version
@@dmitry6135there are russian versions with no English dub and with (awful) Carson dub.
I am Romanian in my ancestry Mr. Dmitry. I know the centuries old truth, about you, Ukrainians, English, Germans, and others. Trust me, I know way more than you think!
Не перевели остаток где он говорит про байдена😂 там есть что послушать.
He's simply saying Tucker was too honest for an American.
no lol
I thought exactly what Putin remarks when watching the interview. In fact, it was more like a chat.
I've watched almost all the interviews with Putin over the years. He doesn't do lightweight, nor does he respect it... lol. He prefers tough journalism and is well able to fight his corner. I think Tucker played right into the hands of the politicians and the corporate media's criticism of the way he conducted the interview.
@@WhimsiWonders watch full version, but with correct translation
@@VelesZzz Could you please provide the link to this interview
Avoiding asking difficult questions is being honest?
Misleading headlines such as this gets you cheap applause from within your bubble, but continues to erode public trust in your publication and profession.
Which perfectly encapsulated Tucker's antipodes approach to Putin: keep it simple and attempt to get straight answers. I understand what Putin was anticipating, but Tucker wanted people to have a clear view of the situation instead of the interview being bogged down in obfuscation, which is what has been happening regarding Russia for the last two years. Being straightforward and simple was the best approach Tucker could have taken.
How is it misleading?
publication and profession? There are no such words in western media´s vocabulary!
I love this comment. But what headline would you recommend?
surely that horse bolted long ago ? 😂
The translation is incorrect - Putin meant sneaky questions like other reporters that take interview only to show themselves. And Putin said he was ready to fight those questions like he had in the past, when people ask questions but didn't care about the answer.
Dangerous to misinterpret.
Sharp mind for his age.
Tucker tongue 😛 tied to his brain 🧠 😂😂
Putin was acctually disappointed and you can see that he thinks that interview wasn't the best.
I don't think that Carson is able to do better but he had a chance.
@@A.Je00 I promise you - Putin is experience politic and he will never show what he really think or feel, he will tell you what he wanna convey.
When Tucker pushed him on the jailed WSJ journalist, I’m surprised Putin didn’t bring up Assange.
whataboutism and double standards is what western medias are professional at
Потому что Ассанж, получая информацию, не делал это конспиративно)) А это очень большая разница в этих двух делах)
@@vladimirvladimirov8313 Ja lige præcist! Når nogen snakker Engelsk, så skal du altid være sikker på du svarer i et sprog der er totalt anderledes, så får du den anden person til at spilde tid med at oversætte det hvis de ikke bruger CZcams app'en som alle de andre zombier! :)
Man thats true, and Assange reminds me that 1984 is correct.
Путин УПАМЯНУЛ ОСАНЖА!!!
He still has to fly out after everything is said and done.
Yup.
Tucker had a 20th floor hotel room, with a window that simply just refused to shut!
True, plane accidents are prone to happen...
Remember Prigozhin
Nah I don’t think he was worried about that. I just think he was smart enough not to play into Putin’s hand. Putin was ready for confrontation, and as he’s proven with many other American journalists he handles the heat extremely well. However the respectful but direct approach? It’s harder for him to hide behind outrage and avoid those kinds of questions.
I like how the same media that keep hardballing Zelensky with impossible questions such as food preferences keep calling Tucker on not making tough questions . You have to appreciate the irony!
Who is calling tucker to ask more difficult questions? Tucker was the one who advertised it as hard questions with putin then did none of that
@@patrickbateman1660 tucker advertised this exactly like it was. An interview about the Ukraine war and about giving someone else the chance to talk instead of the same narrative that western media gives.
As to who calls him softballing. Literally every western media that's mainstream.
@@GothPaokiDoesn't really matter what most western media are saying or not. Tucker was softballing, period. Mostly because he (and by extention his followers) lacks intelectual capacity to recognize all the historical lies that Putin repeated.
one is a mass murderer the other is not.
@@irinaspalko7846So by your logic journalists shouldn't have conducted any interview with the American mass murderers like Bush, Nixon, Obama and Biden.
Difficult when Putin was giving a history lesson and then kept telling Tucker to not interrupt him
Get Biden to have an unscripted interview with a Russian then.
he counts history from the point he decides
Yet Americans lack the knowledge. There was a reason he gave us a background.
Americans count the the west from the point they decide. Currently its at the Russian border.@@helloworld77771
Putin is lying as he is used to. Tucker had every reason to be afraid to ask tough question. This is a facade.
I think the translation and Guardian is getting "sharp" (which in English is associated with intelligent) mixed up with rude and blunt which is what Putin is referring to.
I think he doesn't mean rude and blunt questions, rather those which are provocative and very hard to answer
no, best way to translate sharp and "острая" in this context is very offencive, very tough with applying pressure.
острые вопросы = sharp questions = inconvinient questions. In no way offencive, especially in this scenario @@lembergevgenii298
Rude?
As a native speaker - Putin was talking about the english varient of Sharp, he in a way respected what Tucker was known for and thus came armed mentally for the interview. I think it threw Putin off when Tucker was so passive during it.
More of the same from British news, twist it so it fits your own narrative. Bravo!
?????? Post a clear in context clip. Use qhat putin said i title and that is misleading? How
Oh shut it everybody does it
Copium
I think you’ll find it’s Russian media and government that twists everything to fit their own narrative.
The Kremlin did the translation 😂
great misleading title guys. keep it up.
Ps: there's this thing called the internet, where people can find full versions of stuff. might wanna look it into, it's gonna catch on
you do realise your comment helps the algorithm and makes short videos more popular?
@@tentringer4065
you are also contributing.
but you just want to 'spread the word'
turns out... the OP does, too.
Guardian kinda forgot how to be journalists.
@@yourstrulytk12 the difference is, I'm not complaining about the content. I don't mind short videos as an introduction to a news story.
Но он (Путин) действительно сказал, что был удивлен что Такер так себя вел, он одидал что интервью будет по другому идти
The proper translation in this context would be “formidable”, not “dangerous”
He got a point, the more tough and complex questions are, the better the opportunity to sell yourself and show your ability of thinking and responding in a matter that will leave the public to appreciate and respect you.
Dude evaded all “though” questions with his history lesson
Yeah. You didn't watch the interview, did you?
I watched it. He was prepared for nasty interview that's why he thought let's cover history first so that everything becomes relevant and tied up but to putins displeasure tucker didn't ask nasty questions, that's why the history lesson felt odd. Had tucker asked questions that mr Putin thought he would everything would have been relevant.😂
Tucker pushed on a couple of points for clarity and let's not forget he did ask directly for a prisoner release and suggested the official spy narrative was incorrect, that's pretty bold considering who he's addressing!
Except that other Western journalists have asked Putin questions like why his political opponents end up dead or in jail.
@@pallhebut we know the answer to that. He doesn’t want opposition because it’s a threat to his power, that has been clear for decades. Tucker just wanted to know precisely why Putin started this war, and how it could be stopped. And Putin gave valuable insights.
Cope! Cope more!
@@dan-d1732We already knew this information before. All Putin was doing, was just repeating the same talking points that he’s had ever since he started the war.
@@dan-d1732 The person who started the war gave valuable insight on how it could be stopped? Is this some joke that I'm not getting?
I still don’t know which Ice Cream Putin eats?
48 kopeek
No, he wasn't surprised.
Putin is simply having another dig at Carlson. He knew full well he would get no tough questions. He didn't want that, he wanted a 'party political broadcast' opportunity to talk to his supporters and rally his sympathetic US politicians. It didn't matter who was sat across from him, anyone from the west would do.
No, Chris Wallace actually confronted Putin in several topics. But you're right in part, Putin never accepted requests from other Western journalists.
I'm talking about the Carlson interview. @@ZombieTomato
"I wasn't prepared for it. I wanted it"
G
He acctually said that he was prepared and wanted it
He sayed "I was not JUST prepared for it (like "I was not only prepared for it") but I wanted it", It's literally translated that way cmon! xDD
The Guardian & the rest of DYING legacy media can interview Putin and ask the tough questions instead of keep ranting.
No they can't, because Putin won't allow it. Many western media outlets tried to interview Putin, but Kremlin won't allow it, because unlike Tucker, they might actually ask relevant questions. Not to mention that all independent media are banned in Putin's Russia
😂 You’ve got em there.
Almost like both CNN and BBC interviewers have asked to interview him but Putin declined. But keep telling the main stream media to interview him!! You really got em there!!
The Kremlin said Putin declined, when correcting Tucker for saying only he requested an interview...
They keep denying every interview request but ironically Tucker got one?
I think Tucker right by letting Putin talking more than ask questions in order to attack Putin .
that the reason why people like this interview.
We want to know what Putin thinks about The West and Ukraine war , from there we can draw our own conclusion .
Putin himself wanted tough questions. But, sure, keep on pushing your narrative that Tucker is a great journalist.
But sometimes you just need to let people talk @@ZombieTomato
@@CursedImagesEverydayBut again: Putin himself wanted to be asked tough questions, not sit there in a boring interview. Putin said he didn't enjoy the interview.
@@CursedImagesEveryday if you were really interested, you would find hundreds of interviews with Putin in which he gives the same answers. For russians there was nothing new in an interview with Tucker because we have been listening to the same narrative for the last 10 years. It is only your problem that you need a whole 2 hours long interview for that. Us (I'm a Russian oppositionist against Putin) and Putin himself aren't happy with the interview because it's silly and boring, nothing new as I have already said. And Tucker had a chance to ask a difficult question but he never did.
@@oanshee2462can you have the work to tell us examples of those interviews with English translations please? I'm interested on what he says to his people about all of this.
Suddenly Putin making sense to all 😅while the west leaders sounds like straight from kindergarten 😂
Sounded like he was trying too be very respectful towards him. This is the kind of interviews i like !
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Cope!
A better translation would be "cutting questions"...
The phrase in English is thorny questions.
🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸🇷🇺🇺🇸 Love my Russian brothers!
from Russia with love❤
❤❤❤
Maybe you didn't know, but the people who support Putin, they hate America.
❤береги себя
Be strong, friend 👍
He overprepared for the boss fight 😂
If you sprinkle some grated chives on your cheese on toast, it adds a surprisingly delightful rustic twist to this tradition dish 🧀 🥪
Would like to see Boris interviewing Putin
Carlson made the discussion with Putin so simple that Biden can barely understand it.
😆
Discussion?
. Biden has more intellect than carlson any day. carlson doesn’t even realize how much Putin is making a fool out of him. please look at the Meidas Touch information on this “interview”
It wasn't a discussion or interview, it was Putin's story hour.
Where is this full interview?
Better no sharp questions than no questions at all. Where is the interview from “The Guardian”? Oh, right… they don’t have the balls to do it.
No, no questions is better than no hard questions.
Errr... many Western journalists have requested interviews, Putin has declined every single time... Source: Kremlin.
What is the point if the interview does not provide the deep analysis and reasoning. Tucker made it easy for Putin to be deceptive through stories
Putin doesnt want to speak to Guardian because he got no balls to do it.
tucker interviewing putin is just one piece of the plan to destroy US-EU relations and for russia to start more wars in Europe.
Wow! Great journalism here. Instead of asking Putin those "hard" questions, the Guardian just asks him to gossip about Tucker, like 2 teenage girls...give me a break!
You have some learning to do. The Kremlin itself said many Western journalists have requested interviews and were denied, except for Tucker... delete your comment, you're looking like a fool.
I found the full interview fascinating some sharper questions may have helped and it could have gone much deeper, this is far too important to be left to a journalist like Carlson, none the less I thought it was in valuable and a game changer.
What did you learn from this interview ????????
@@antoinedebiran3000 i meant the 2 hour interview from Carlson.. actually not much, as i had been looking into it already.. more like a reinforncement of what i had already deduced.
First, Tucker isn't a journalist, he's an entertainer. Second, everything Putin said was in his 2021 article published in the Kremlin website. Anyone curious about the war in Ukraine had already read it.
@@ZombieTomato yes, i agree with all of that.. i guess the 'entertainer' has bought those realities into the attention of those who were not paying attention
@@antoinedebiran3000 As the average joe who doesn't consume much traditional / mainstream "news" i learned a few things from the Tucker / Putin interview.
1. The US gov't blew up nord stream and tried to blame it on Russia.
2. It's clear to me Putin does not want a pro-longed war & wants a resolution in Ukraine.
3. For reasons unclear to me, our current gov't (mostly democrats) insists on war with Russia.
4. Why tf do we keep isolating Russia? All that's doing is making China stronger!
Watch the interview in full. There's a lot of interesting stuff about Blinken in that book. It was yesterday. Putin's interview with Pavel Zarubin
Did he go off about mongol history again?
can't find it anywhere
It can't be found in full
Is Pavel Zarubin a western journalist? Why does he club him with Tucker?
@IPATIY.A: please do you have a link for it ?
Was planed before that monolog 😂😂😂
As if all questions weren't pre-approved before the sit-down...
womp womp
@@gigafordrive Important such as?
Of course they weren't
@@gigafordrive Excusing a lying Tucker is always a bad move. Fox found out the hard way to the tune of $700 and some change millions.
It has been said the main theme of the interview would be the war discussion. And Tucker was rarely looking at his notes. Watch and listen carefully.
And where are The Guardian's tough questions for Boris Johnson
Tucker is not a toughie. He is a fly with the wind type of guy.
It is difficult to put a 'sharp' question to someone smart like Putin. Tucker did throw a few difficult ones at him like the jailed journalist
are you serious? he 100% avoided hard topics. No questions about war crimes, repressions, opposition, Duntsova or Nadezhdin. It's just ridiculous. He literally bought Carlson and now he's 'surprised' there were no sharp questions? jeez
@@sdust_88 he has a family to go back to
hey, the jailed journalist is a meme question tbh. The dude's a spy, he doesn't suppose to get freed in near decade. So there's a tougher offence on him, not just marijuana or whatnot. But in the West narrative it's somewhat noble cause. ) well, just some documents and the dude is young too, please? That's not how boarders work, srry. But again, don't forget it's a show for the west. There had to be a noble martyr somewhere, as Zel is no longer the case😊
@@rukson8773then why even go in the first place if he didnt plan on actaully asling questions?
@@patrickbateman1660 to get insight on the current world events which is the ukraine war .
Spero che tutti sentissero l'intervista solo così potranno rispettare la Russia
*sentano
Respect Russia for its being controlled by a demon?
@@elllie mi scuso per l' errore ma nella fretta di dire la mia non mi son accorta dell' errore
I love how this comment section is full of pro-Putin users who think this translation is misleading. острые means "sharp" in Russian. It can also mean pointed or critical. It's how Russians describe everything from knives to tongues. острый нож means sharp knife. The Guardian's translation is perfect.
The title is misleading.
The one Guardian lover 😂
@@darcyasher2716 are you blind this was filmed by kremlin.
I would replace word sharp with spicy. Sharp usually refered as smart.
"A dangerous person" can also mean "incredible person" since very similar word is used in my language Tamil - "bayangara"..
Putin also Said he prefers Biden. He knows Bidens every move.
It's just a deflection, trump undermines nato, he wants trump.
If this is true it is because he know Trump is stronger.
Remember trump is unpredictable because he is unstable
@Natt_Uggla10 trump is dangerous to Russia China and North Korea, but also the world the civilised world.
@@Natt_Uggla10 putin is deflecting, he wants trump because trump undermines nato.
If they can twist history while we are present , what about the history they tought us? Which happened when we weren't there??? Makes me question everything
SERIOUSLY
It's time to break out of the matrix.
They both knew what questions are going to be asked. 💩
The rest of the world wasn’t surprised!
Tucker like most American people don't know the subject enough to ask sharp questions. Emotion is privileged in American mainstream media over knowledge and truth
Funny Putin said about Blinkin. That he is Russian )) his grandfather moved in 1904 to America from Kiev. And Blinkin did said his family had to leave Russia. So he admitted that Kiev was russian state 😂
You misspelt Kyiv
@@markrobert16 kiev
😂 I’ll help you Kyiv
@@markrobert16 it is spelled kiev as in chicken kiev
No one denies it was part of the Russian Empire in 1904. That’s not a “gotcha”. Any more than people recognising Ireland was governed by Britain back then.
“I didn’t have to use my
Novichok, so that was nice”
If Putin wanted a tough interview, then why did he stonewall for 30 minutes with an obscure history lesson that could've been summarized in 5 minutes?
Кто нибудь скажите....ЗАЧЕМ Я ЧИТАЮ СУБТИТРЫ 😅
Да, за этими специалистами проверять нужно.
Was it accurate? Although I suppose if there was you would +edit[of->have] said something already.
I don't get how he thinks he's dangerous, because Carlson let him talk lol? 😂
I think Putin was being rather sarcastic about Tucker being dangerous.
Anyway, in Putin's explanation of why he thinks Tucker is a dangerous person, he described how Tucker is unpredictable.
It a way of saying he is intelligent...The dangerous part os taken out of context..Its more of a compliment
In russian on may call a person "dangerous" jokingly. It s better to take as a compliments to once intelligence and may be cunningness.
He doesn't think he's dangerous. At least not to Putin. He wants to give credibility to Tucker.
This is the first time ive heard Putin speak.
Putin should let Piers Morgan interview him next
He expected not-so-sharp vice news journalists
Instead he got not so sharp fox news journalists
Hola 👋
Tucker did it different and better than any other journalist could have.
He just wanted to make it back home 😂
Hilarious! Why? Because this interviewer also doesn't get the chance to ask any question! (And by his scared looks he also wouldn't dare...)
Putin surpised at the easy questions which he preaproved before the interview. Lol.
nothing was pre-approved in this interview
@@wjhdtyqbc324 Sure sure random belarusian guy.
@@Gabson9😂 yeah, it's funny how they all have the same kind of channel: 2 years of life, no contents. 😮
true it was an underwhelming interview
Because nothing new was learned.
@@thatlittlevoice6354A Lot of things are learned
He didn't dare ask he most probably told he must stick to the scrip
Another reporter should interview with the “sharp questions” i would like to see how it plays out
i am surprised he said Tucker's plan of interview was unexpected and not comfortable.
He didn't say not comfortable, he said he didn't get full pleasure of of it
He didn't say not comfortable
The thing is that Tucker ignored many things and that made the discussion difficult for Putin.
@@tayikolla6205Because he wasn't there for that -- he went with clear intent, asking Putin about things that more or less have directly impacted American taxpayers and getting Putin's perspective on it. Remember what Tucker said in a post-interview, that he loves America but hates how a lot of taxpayer's money is being used to fund a war that has nothing to do with America. When you look at the interview from this lens, the questioning makes perfect sense.
@@Billy-bc8pk Don't regard to these words of Putin (that Carlson is a dangerous man) too seriously. I think that words of Putin that he wants to Biden win elections are also should to understand with a share of humour.
The past few years media were speculating that this man had terminal health problems. Never believe about their hearsay. That one, unless he is a clone, is in better health than anyone else.😁
Biden is healthier than him and Trump
The rimmer Tucker gave him before the interview helped to make him appear more robust.
A little botox and makeup work wonders
@@tayletubby5138 ботакс и макияж, ни как не влияют на физическое состояние и умственные способности человека, это Вам к сведению, по этому если нет мозгов, то ботакс и макияж не помогут, пример Байден.
He is ill
I’m sure he must have realised how loaded some of the question were and how suited to the journalist trick of asking an isolated question then having other journalists treat the reply as a spontaneous statement
hard to get a tough question when u know what is going to be asked beforehand XDDD
Putin offended him at a first glance of serious question. So he's not being honest here.
If anything, his stupidity offended him.
Putin was offended by Tucker interrupt him, not his question
Bravo to you, Tucker, you put Vladimir Putin on his heels in this interview in the best way possible. You opened the door for diplomacy and a relationship. If Vladimir Putin knows that there are other Americans that are like Tucker in belief, and thought, there is a chance for a relationship, not a war.
i think that main intention of that interview was, to change mind of americans population, bcs most of US senators atc. have no interest to stop this war and military support.
in interview V.P. said - that is prepared for dialogue - negotiation and i think, that this intention must understand ordinary citizens and pressure the senators from bellow
russia will never be a better ally to the US than what the EU is. Never.
tucker interviewing putin is just one piece of the plan to destroy US-EU relations and for russia to start more wars in Europe.
I was so confused with the translations that i choose for the CC of CZcams and then i got it.
It was an interview, not an interrogation.
Was a great interview. I love history and particularly enjoyed his argument on the claim to Kiev on historical ties to the Rus Kingdom. Most people have no historical context and I thought it made sense for Putin to explain.
The capital of the Rus kingdom was in Kyiv when Moscow was a village. So by that logic Kyiv should a claim on Moscow, not the other way about.
@@DickFrancis-dt3tl By that logic London has clam to US.
Who cares about historical context? I couldn't care less which people came from whom and who was there first.
@@ZombieTomato Putin cares!
Revisionist history
Its called respect, and more so-called journalists should take note.
Putin said, tucker “followed the plan”. Did he mean, tucker was advised to only ask certain questions?
That's what i felt too
Like being granted a wish then wishing for something very small
Thank you very much for the truth about Russia. I always thought that everything was bad there...
The “truth” according to Putin. 😂
How many sharp questions have you asked Zelensky. Or for that matter Israel?
‘tough questions’ never mentioned...
bruh he spoke about history for an 1 and a half
thats why there was no sharp questions cus you ignored him.
Putin just called Tucker 'Badass' in nice words, that's a very big complement coming from Putin himself
So funny seeing all these 'journalists' that won't do interviews in Russia, complaining that the only person to go to Russia and do an interview was 'too soft'. Maybe go yourself then if you have some better questions to ask?
Maybe he intended to be aggressive, but had second thoughts when he learned that Navalny's cell was going to get empty.
Why was it clipped at 38 seconds
It ended too early and I think they both wanted to continue for another hour. Tucker was probably too shy to ask Putin if he could get another hour of his time which is understandable. It easily had 4 hour interview potential.
Yes another 2 hours of Putin's ramblings about the 13th century and irrelevent history would've really kept you on edge 🤣🤣🤣
tucker has said they spoke in private after the interview
I'm sure Putin could have talked about very interesting topics for another 2 hours. Only it would no longer be of interest to the general public. And of course they talked in private.
Oh Guardian´s selective editing how nice again! Do you dare to put also other talks of Putin or should Carlson again go to Russia to ask questions? XD
How many of the recent US are that humble?!
Loves the sound of his own voice
Well, at least he admitted Tucker went in merely to give Putin a rimmer...
Keep coping in your WWE fantasies
I bet you are the type that can't say what a woman is, am I right?
Putin gave a nice history lesson lol
Lets see the BBCs interview with Putin....
The BBC is banned in Russia... So that's on Putin.
Putin is too scared of the BBC to agree to an interview. He picked Tucker to get an easy ride.
Take a look at bbc interviewing Ilham Aliev from Azerbaijan: you'll learn how to f..k the bbc. I believe bbc is still"under impression" to repeat the story with Putin
How is he going to make sharp questions if Tucker is borderline pro Russia
You guys in the comments are so desperate to defend Tucker, it's both funny and pathetic at the same time. Tough questions, sharp questions, it doesn't matter. If you had basic reading comprehension, you'd know that they are similar. At one point, Tucker asked him "will Russia be satisfied with the land already conquered if peace comes?" Putin _ignored_ the question outright and backtracked the previous question, and Tucker never pushed him to answer the original, so the question may as well never been asked.
A very interesting interview! It lasts for half an hour.They hide it from the Western viewer, as usual. I recommend finding and watching the full Russian version with translation!
that's because tucker was reading from a script written by Putin. Tucker didn't like tbe idea of falling out of a window for pointing out Putins lies and barbarity
Why else do you think carlson moved into a wood cabin? No high windows.
Nice fantasy.
You interview him and ask him “the tough questions” yourself then. 😉👍 No? Didn’t think so.
It's Google translate?????😂😂😂😂
Привет британской прессе!
Putin said "so-called sharp questions" that are actually just aggressive interrupting matches.
Nice try, Guardian.
You should watch the whole version of this interview. Be sure you’ve never heard so much bullsht at one time.
Голосуй за Байдена. Спасибо.
I LOVE how y’all edited the part where Putin was about to reveal Carlson’s plan.