Quantum Physics Explained | Wondrium Perspectives

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 12. 06. 2024
  • Want to stream more content like this… and 1,000’s of courses, documentaries & more?
    👉 👉 Start Your Free Trial of Wondrium tinyurl.com/bdd346es 👈 👈
    -------------------------------------------
    Light is everywhere-it allows us to interpret the world around us and is a crucial requirement for life on Earth. But what is light? This is a fundamental question of quantum physics, and even Einstein had difficulty wrapping his brain around it.
    In this episode of Perspectives, three scientists discuss the groundbreaking research that led us to our current understanding of the quantum world.
    -------------------------------------------
    Clips in this video are from the following series on Wondrium:
    Understanding the Misconceptions of Science, presented by Don Lincoln
    www.wondrium.com/understandin...
    Understanding the Quantum World, presented by Erica W. Carlson
    www.wondrium.com/understandin...
    What Einstein Got Wrong, presented by Dan Hooper
    www.wondrium.com/what-einstei...
    -------------------------------------------
    Chapter List:
    00:00 The Two-Slit Experiment
    02:28 The Photoelectric Effect
    06:39 Is Light a Particle or a Wave?
    08:29 The Wave-Particle Duality of Electrons
    12:54 The Probabilistic View of Quantum Mechanics
    -------------------------------------------
    Wondrium Perspectives is hosted by Rich Bernett.
    ---------
    Welcome to Wondrium on CZcams.
    Here, you can enjoy a carefully curated selection of the history, science, and math videos you’ve come to know and love from brands like The Great Courses, and more.
    If you’ve ever wanted to travel back in time, wondered about the science of life, wished for a better understanding of math, or dreamt of exploring the stars … then Wondrium will be your new favorite channel on CZcams!
    If you decide you’d like to learn more about what you love, check out the full experience at wondrium.com/CZcams
    There, you’ll find in-depth answers to everything you’ve ever wondered, with mind-blowing surprises along the way.
    Your brain is going to love this place!
    -------------------------------------------
    You can also read thousands of articles from the smartest experts in their fields at The Great Courses Daily: www.wondriumdaily.com
    And, of course, check us out on all of our social channels:
    -Facebook: / wondrium
    -Twitter: / wondrium
    -Instagram: / wondrium
    -------------------------------------------
    [Three hashtags that apply to the video topic]

Komentáře • 197

  • @Roberto-REME
    @Roberto-REME Před rokem +22

    Outstanding and superb production. The narration was easy to follow, well enunciated and engaging. Plus the topics presented were well organized, sequential and smartly presented. This is the most effective new way of teaching others the marvels of the universe. Well done!

    • @TheGreatCourses
      @TheGreatCourses  Před rokem +3

      Thank you so much for your kind feedback, Roberto! We truly pride ourselves on our professors and the depth of our content and are very glad you're enjoying our offerings. Thanks for being a fan!

    • @2killnspray9
      @2killnspray9 Před 8 měsíci

      ​@@TheGreatCoursesThis is only one example of quantum physics. It doesn't represent "quantum physics" just one example. There are many more ecen more crazy examples.

    • @Peepew987
      @Peepew987 Před 2 měsíci

      Gayass response😊

  • @WeeWeeJumbo
    @WeeWeeJumbo Před 2 lety +27

    i will never get tired of this particular subject

    • @syoofmadkhaneh6570
      @syoofmadkhaneh6570 Před 10 měsíci

      Me tooooo its the only subject i search for on youtube.. but still couldnt find an answer to the question: is space-time a matter? Is it made of particles?

    • @alansabin7487
      @alansabin7487 Před 29 dny

      just started to get into this at the age of 67, will continue to do so
      but I am getting a little motion sickness from the waves. I never have
      been able to go deep sea fishing, LOL take care. i would like to see
      the way the partical or wave is produce to shoot the gaps in the walls.

  • @Degenhardt450
    @Degenhardt450 Před 2 měsíci +2

    Thank you for this video, I’m a little closer to get my head around the subject in a way that isn’t going to make my head explode.😂

  • @TheFos88
    @TheFos88 Před 2 lety +2

    Fascinating video and presented well

  • @rebeltz2010
    @rebeltz2010 Před rokem +3

    Wow, you guys knock it out the park, me? its incomprehensible to me to fully get a basic handle on this subject, but you and all, well can I say......thanks so much, truly factual mind-boggling, thinking, cheers. Rien

  • @buti
    @buti Před 3 měsíci +1

    WOW! Amazing content. Subscribed.

  • @mutualink
    @mutualink Před rokem +8

    Very clear explanation for a lay man like me,thank you very much!😀

    • @SAMACAG
      @SAMACAG Před rokem

      Please watch on YoTube: ... EMS Einstein Munchausen Syndrome ...

    • @kandasamym6600
      @kandasamym6600 Před 10 měsíci

      Common must understand science Nature is full of miracles Science is unrawelling the truth.So science is for common man CZcams is giving every thing

  • @pvcmoviestudio8281
    @pvcmoviestudio8281 Před rokem

    astonishing explanation.
    Even a tiny thing your explain with spotless way.

  • @Seekthetruth3000
    @Seekthetruth3000 Před rokem +1

    Confused but, loved it.

  • @donstor1
    @donstor1 Před rokem +22

    I wish Feynman were alive today to make videos for us to watch. I would love to see him do his thing for us non physicists.

    • @eloomile5053
      @eloomile5053 Před rokem +1

      You are very right

    • @turkfiles
      @turkfiles Před rokem

      So true. Love the Feynman diagrams.

    • @baldingeagle8404
      @baldingeagle8404 Před rokem

      You should listen to his inside los alamos lecture it’s on CZcams

    • @donstor1
      @donstor1 Před rokem

      @@baldingeagle8404 I have, thank you.

    • @shrinivasp2
      @shrinivasp2 Před 10 měsíci

      😮😮it is difficult to understand lady

  • @dr.satishsharma1362
    @dr.satishsharma1362 Před 8 měsíci

    Excellent.... thanks.

  • @davidadamson6970
    @davidadamson6970 Před 2 lety +2

    well done, explained the impossibility of quantum mechanics

  • @marvinegreen
    @marvinegreen Před 2 lety

    The error is assuming that peaks and valleys of the wave form are the same. Consider that peaks are observed and valleys are observing. By observation one cancels one half of the wave form which results in particle. Without observation one is left with the full wave form interference pattern.

  • @tiemiahu9947
    @tiemiahu9947 Před 2 lety +7

    Wow!! Awesome videos Wondrium, good information, good diagrams well explained and I like the use of the collaboration of scientists, well done. So the question is; 'What is light'? A wave or a particle? Acting on a field or moving through space? Or could it be all of the above? Einstein's theory of relativity, as I understand it, presents space as a field that matter, energy, substance and force relate to, act on and function within, (please correct me if I'm wrong)....
    What if that space field was made up of particles, such as neutrinos, that reacted in a wave like function to any force, matter, substance or energy that was applied to it or relative to its influence? Such as gravity, pressure, motion, heat, light, gaseous substances, material mass, and maybe even time, as such space particles could probably relate independently and collectively, internally and therefore externally with each other, and probably by which maybe even act with distant particles, possibly even universally,,,,,
    Or am I missing something??...

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 2 lety +1

      Light is the excitation of a quantum field, which is neither. Whenever somebody is talking about the "wave-particle duality", you already know that they don't understand the subject.

    • @tiemiahu9947
      @tiemiahu9947 Před 2 lety +1

      @@schmetterling4477 Thanks for your correction, but what do you mean by 'Light is the excitation of a quantum field', that doesn't explain anything to me at all. I understand the subject, i.e. what is light? I just don't understand the answers that are given, let alone the fancy word jargon used to explain it, do the fancy words make you feel like you know what you're talking about? that's the impression I get from quantum theorists, huh more fancy words!!....

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 2 lety +1

      @@tiemiahu9947 Quantum field theory is simply the theory that describes all of currently known microscopic physics correctly. It tells you how the electromagnetic, weak and color force behave. That makes up 100% of all ordinary matter and measured radiation. The fundamental "object" that the theory describes is called a quantum field. That's all there is to it.
      In case of electromagnetism, the em-QFT has an effective classical mean field theory that is being described by Maxwell's equations. No such behavior exists for the weak and the color force.
      Can I explain QFT to you here in detail? No. That takes 1000 page textbooks. The math is, whether we like it or not, pretty horrible.

    • @tiemiahu9947
      @tiemiahu9947 Před 2 lety +1

      @@schmetterling4477 Hello, thank you for your explanation of quantum field theory, but that didn't help either, I watched the video again regarding whether light is a particle or a wave, and I'm still under the impression that there's still more work to be done before quantum theory is complete. I believe it's on the right track, some of the things quantum physics is discovering and creating is truly amazing. And so it should with the amount of money and technology being thrown at it
      I read The Urantia Book, it's online, It's about God and creation and aligns with the Maori cultural viewpoint of my forefathers, which I've been trained through traditional Maori art during the early 1980s.. I've been studying this book for more then 35 years, it's a big book and very comprehensive,
      It portrays the make up and organization of creation, and gives really good models and descriptions about various aspects of creation which I think quantum mechanics could prove, that's what caught my attention. But it would appear most people become scientists to disprove God exists at all, funny thing is he's the one thing science will never be able to prove does exist!!
      And I still go with the idea of an all pervading particle field that reacts as a wave function relative to energy, force, substance, mass, matter and motion.
      Thanks for the interaction...

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 2 lety +1

      @@tiemiahu9947 You are clearly reading the wrong books. Nothing beats a physics education. :-)

  • @robertzali3340
    @robertzali3340 Před 2 lety +3

    It had to be interpreted from the discoveries of Heinrich Hertz and Maxwell, not from what Max Plank suggested to the philosopher Einstein.

  • @sumitraghani
    @sumitraghani Před rokem

    Best sequential understanding of lights wave particle duality

  • @ikaeksen
    @ikaeksen Před 2 lety

    10:41 if you look at them carefully, you will notice if you turned one of "all them dots" so its upside down compared to what it was and turn it also arround it self a half turn, you end up with a pattern which is the same on both sides...it took me under 5 seconds to see that it was the same pattern just turned arround in certain ways.

    • @blueonblue9066
      @blueonblue9066 Před rokem

      That's because the artist used the same picture (of some dots) for both clusters, rotating one 180 degrees relative to the other.

  • @josiahtiburcio7036
    @josiahtiburcio7036 Před rokem

    Can electron emissions be interpreted with emission/absorption line spectrum, where electron emissions jumps from one energy level to infinity? Light would not need to be a particle then.
    Is there any effect if the slit used for electron changed conductivity or density or thickness? Just thinking about the panel acting as capacitor. Or maybe if the path is filled with different densities of noble gas at various psi.
    Coz if it doesn't, the electrons won't mind if we fit a loop of wire between the slits and passively detect where the electron went through induction.

  • @venkybabu8140
    @venkybabu8140 Před 9 měsíci

    Circle is an inversion point from random to coherent. Essentially magnetic field can be created only by that from hyperbolic to parabolic. When you say delta E equals delta B plus delta I. That's why you see fan coil winding so complex.

  • @someoneontheinternet3090
    @someoneontheinternet3090 Před 2 lety +4

    8:31 - I've heard of the slit experiment many times over but this is the first time that I heard that they used light to measure it. Like she said, my initial thought was that the light they were using to measure was interfering in some way. Clearly it was if there was a flash. Then you turn the light down and you get your interference pattern back. Which seems to me like it should be more evidence that it's the measurement light causing the problem. I just don't get how you can be confident in anything if your method of measuring requires interfering with it in anyway at all before it hits the wall. It's always been presented to me as if just by looking at it we change it, but this sounds a lot more like massively interfering with it.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 2 lety +1

      Actually, the first time you heard about this was probably in high school, you just didn't listen at the time. You had far more important things to do than to learn science as a teenager. :-)

    • @The_Trojan
      @The_Trojan Před 2 lety

      The really amazing this is that if you only monitor one slit (as you only need to monitor one slit to know which slit the electron goes through) the interference pattern disappears for the electrons going through both slits.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 2 lety

      @@The_Trojan What is amazing about energy disappearing when we absorb energy from the system? It's like cutting down a tree and then wondering why the tree disappeared.

    • @The_Trojan
      @The_Trojan Před 2 lety

      @@schmetterling4477 Sorry, what does this have to do with Energy? Where is Energy disappearing exactly?

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 2 lety

      @@The_Trojan Quanta are energy. When we are measuring "a quantum", we are absorbing that amount of energy.

  • @josephpeebles2246
    @josephpeebles2246 Před 11 měsíci +3

    The debate between light wave and its' actual formation was interesting. After incubating my thoughts on this matter, I have to interject a questionable principle. Could it be possible that because space ( or dark matter ) has no atmosphere, is it possible that light travels in a straight line trajectory because there is nothing to interfere with the directional flow of light and its' energy? Hence, once light has entered into the Earth's orbit and travels toward Earth's surface, it could be possible that the Earth's many layers of atmospheres have interfered with the straight-line trajectory of the incoming light. Therefore, creating a wave-like pattern. Therefore, it seems perfectly logical to me that light can travel in both a straight-line and a wave pattern. Again, it seems perfectly logical to me.

    • @mkuehn5450
      @mkuehn5450 Před 5 měsíci

      old comment, but i needed a spot to post.
      The glaring defect in this is the inability to measure without changing the results. Schrodinger + Heisenberg.
      i'll also stop them right there when they are comparing amplitude to frequency, it's a bad analogy.
      "Amplitude governs energy" is a lie. think about horsepower, or work done over time.
      likewise 'predictive' mathematical models IF the baseline premise are wrong?
      my 5th or more "quantum explained" yet all resort to "if you think you understand anything..."
      but it's too easy to stand back and throw stones.

  • @urieowrjdf
    @urieowrjdf Před 2 lety

    Great video! Thank you.

  • @shadowoffire4307
    @shadowoffire4307 Před 2 lety

    I clicked on this chanels video's thumbnail and started the watch this video then after 2:26 minutes got surprised when fermilab guy came.

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime Před 3 měsíci

    010 I.S. QM Information System, and/or Infinity Squared .

  • @davidwalker5054
    @davidwalker5054 Před rokem +1

    I once asked a professor of quantum theory. if a tree falls in a forest and there is nobody around. Does it make a sound. He said yes it makes a sound but we can,t be exactly sure where the tree was

  • @oO-_-_-_-Oo
    @oO-_-_-_-Oo Před 2 lety

    spooky action at a distance indeed

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime Před 2 měsíci

    Q.M.Telepathy I.S. Information System - 010 GPS - Gravitational Propulsion System.

  • @SC-jh9qp
    @SC-jh9qp Před 2 lety

    Trivial point, but I found it quite distracting the way the speakers kept turning from camera to camera.

  • @adriangheorghe2327
    @adriangheorghe2327 Před 2 lety

    Efectul fotoelectric este produs prin aparitia unui impuls electric de inductie, ce apare in urma amortizarii bruste (in urma spargerii) undei stationare de mare amplitudine, nascuta din interferenta constructiva a tuturor undelor componente ale fotonului incident in stratul superficial al metalului, dupa contractia proportionala cu indicele de refractie al metalului si refractia lor la 360 de grade. Numai asa se poate asigura conservarea simultana si a impulsului si a energiei cinetice ale fotonului incident in metal. Un foton nu poate interactiona, nu poate ciocni direct un electron fiindca are sectiunea mult mai mare decat dimensiunea electronului.
    The photoelectric effect is produced by the appearance of an induction electric impulse, which appears after the sudden damping (after breaking) of the high amplitude standing wave, born from the constructive interference of all the component waves of the incident photon in the surface layer of the metal. the refractive index of the metal and their refraction at 360 degrees. This is the only way to ensure the simultaneous preservation of the momentum and kinetic energy of the incident photon in the metal. A photon cannot interact, it cannot directly collide with an electron because it has a section much larger than the size of the electron.
    .

    • @adriangheorghe2327
      @adriangheorghe2327 Před 2 lety

      Am omis sa spun ca unda de mare amplitudine a fotonului incident si refractat in stratul superficial al metalului, este bipolara, este compusa doar din doua semiunde diametral opuse si se comporta exact ca un curent electric produs de o singura sarcina electrica elementara (de un singur electron) printro spira. La spargerea spirei, din cauza interactiunii cu ionii din reteaua cristalina a metalului, apare impulsul electric de mare amplitudine, care accelereaza electronul din imediata vecinatate. Sensul impulsului electric de inductie poate fi inspre exteriorul metalului si evem efect fotoelectric extern, sau inspre interiorul metalului si atunci avem efect fotoelectric intern. Un efect sau altul este favorizat de tipul jonctiunilor din structura dispozitivului (celulei sau panoului) fotoelectric.
      I failed to say that the high amplitude wave of the incident photon and refracted in the surface layer of the metal, is bipolar, is composed of only two diametrically opposed half-waves and behaves exactly like an electric current produced by a single elementary electric charge (single electron) through a coil. When the coil breaks, due to the interaction with the ions in the crystal lattice of the metal, a large amplitude electrical impulse appears, which accelerates the electron in the immediate vicinity. The direction of the induction electric impulse can be towards the outside of the metal and we have an external photoelectric effect, or towards the inside of the metal and then we have an internal photoelectric effect. One effect or another is favored by the type of junctions in the structure of the photoelectric device (cell or panel).

  • @TheMoonchild1969
    @TheMoonchild1969 Před rokem

    So electron emits photons when changing orbital levels?

  • @rohissangroula3088
    @rohissangroula3088 Před 2 lety +2

    Einstein, the one who conquered the Universe and even has made huge contributions in quantum mechanics, he does have every right to question "God! " Btw Great content selections though!

  • @adriangheorghe2327
    @adriangheorghe2327 Před 2 lety

    Particulele elementare sunt structuri dinamice similare rotorului electric foarte multipolar, sunt sisteme de unde stationare de foarte mare putere, care prin rotatia lor foarte rapida, genereaza fluxul eteric de aspiratie al substantei. Flux care este componenta principala a tensorului gravitational si care genereaza atractia gravifica intre masele de substanta neutra electric.
    The elementary particles are dynamic structures similar to the very multipolar electric rotor, they are very powerful standing wave systems, which through their very fast rotation, generate the etheric aspiration flow of the substance. Flow which is the main component of the gravitational tensor and which generates the gravitational attraction between the masses of electrically neutral substance.

  • @zakirhussain-js9ku
    @zakirhussain-js9ku Před 8 měsíci

    Moving object creates waves in fabric of space like gravitational waves. This wave travels at light speed. Uncertainty in locating particle during its motion is due to wave associated with the particle since it affects its path & location. Particle is always at one location at one time & never at 2 locations or all over the place. Space wave associated with the particle is of temporary nature which dissipates back into space as soon as particle stops its motion. Electron never passes through both slits, interferes with itself or is present at two paths at the same time. It is the space wave which passes through both slits, divides & interferes & guides electron into making interference pattern. The wave associated with electron must be allowed to pass through both slits to produce interference pattern. Detector either stops the electron in which case wave associated with electron dissipates & if electron is detected during its motion the wave associated with photon scaters the wave associated with electron. This is what is called wavefunction collapse.

  • @adriangheorghe2327
    @adriangheorghe2327 Před 2 lety

    Efectul dublei fante se produce datorita interactiunii campului electromagnetic al luminii cu campul de densitate al materialului fantei, care are frecventa apropiata de a luminii si atunci seproduce interferenta campurilor. Radiatiile de energie foarte mare, ale fotonilor grei, ics si gama, nu sufera difractie, reflexie sau refractie si nu produc figuri de interferenta.

    • @adriangheorghe2327
      @adriangheorghe2327 Před 2 lety

      The effect of the double slit occurs due to the interaction of the electromagnetic field of light with the density field of the slit material, which has a frequency close to light and then interference of the fields occurs. Very high energy radiation, of heavy photons, ics and gamma, does not suffer from diffraction, reflection or refraction and does not produce interference figures.

  • @staffonwilkinson7439
    @staffonwilkinson7439 Před 11 měsíci

    A Reflective car headlight is a perfect example

  • @sujeetkumarsanu770
    @sujeetkumarsanu770 Před rokem

    effect of gravitation on light

  • @timothy8426
    @timothy8426 Před 2 lety +3

    Gravitational fields of force holding mass together have different frequencies. Shorter waves have stronger force. Gravitational fields of force are measured in weight. Shorter waves are rebounding faster. Gravitational fields of force produce more weight on photons. Heat is added to the waves of heat, creating stronger Gravitational fields of force holding the pattern together as a particle wave. A photon is heat in resistance. The heat from a lightning strike burns the Atmospheres in resistance creating light instantly giving a thunderous wave of sound dissolving the atmosphere into sound. Released frequencies in resistance to atmosphere. Heavy elements have more force than lighter elements, because of Shorter wave lengths. The outward pressure is weight, held in by gravitational fields of forced motion in resistance. When you lift a bar of lead, you are lifting pressure held within. The leads energy. When external frequencies bounce off mass they rebound outward. Heat gets absorbed in mass. With enough heat the gravitational field of force holding mass together becomes weakened and slumps into fluidity of motion spreading outward pressure into equalization. Motion retains its value in and out of entanglement. In space the lead bar would weaken, but hold its shape, because the outer pressure remains constant in every direction. There is no Atmospheric pressure pushing down on it. Magnetic fields of force are weaker Gravitational fields of force. The Magnetic fields of force hold in earths Atmospheres. If our Magnetic field of force was stronger it would produce more pressure pushing and crushing our atmospherein on us. We are the gravitational field of force that keeps us grounded, our wave lengths vibrate with more force the atmosphere pushing in on us. The atmosphere needs more force to overcome our vibrations. The force around us is greater than the force under us. The force of massive mass has greater force than the atmosphere. We are held together by gravitational fields of forced motion. The vibrating atoms inside our bodies keep us grounded. The outward pressure held in a hot air balloon has more force in it than the atmosphere. So as it vibrates through the atmosphere it pushes through and the Atmospheric pressure under lifts it up. Gravitational fields inside mass are positive, outside negative. Equalization of frequencies interlocking creating Gravitational fields of forced motion. The negative pushing negative away, hence lift. Gravity is the second strongest force. Motion is the strongest. Gravitational fields of force hold fluidity into illusionary solidity. Gravity is your vibrating force of mass repelling outward pressure of mass. Magnetic fields of force are easier to push through. Earths gravitational fields of force, repel outward pressure and hold inward pressure. Negative is the outside of gravitational fields of force, positive the inside. We are being repelled by the earth. The force of energy of gravitational fields of force are barriers on the outside. Weight is frequencies. Hydrogen has less frequencies entangled than helium. Heat is the catalyst that holds mass together. Too much heat creates motion fluidity. Heat creates mass and separates it, depending quantities. Light is heat in resistance. Sparks from passing. When heat is absorbed in mass, ight is the byproduct of resistance flashing as a spark.light isn't absorbed, heat is. All mass absorbs heat. Hydrogen absorbs heat and becomes helium. Heat dissolves or welds mass together. Hydrogen welds to helium, and so forth. This is my theory. Hurricanes in space, is heat swirling in a forced monstrous heat waves from a star collapsing its weak Gravitational fields of force known as a magnetic field and the heat released is overwhelming and heat attracts. When you see light dispersing from the middle of these space hurricanes it is heat escaping the swirling vortex. Crazy right. Heat is the motion transference. Heat is the current frequencies transference of motion. Overwhelming heat powers everything. It has to overcome the negative cold stationary exterior of atoms. Solar winds, warm breezes. The nucleus of atoms surrounded by cold space. A bubble of cold space. The bubble thickens as the atom absorbs heat. What temperature is coldest? There isn't absolute zero. Motion has a constant value of the positive speed of heat. The question is, are we passing through a field of negative space. Heat is motion so we are traveling through space at the speed of heat. Heat forcing galaxies to move through space towards less pressure on the outside of the universe? Just thinking out loud. Trying to use common physics to explain gravitational fields of forced motion flow. I thought space might be in motion. But, now I believe it is stationary. And heat is the force of transference of matter. That would make heat the one and only force of energy. Heat versus space. Two sides of the same coin. That would mean space has more area of containment because mass not only passes through it, it is a point in time where space is constantly moving through all mass as we transfer from one point to the next. Heat passes through space while space in mass is renewable because we move through exchanging points of space in us. Space doesn't bend. Heat does. Cold is immobile space? I hope that my ranting hasn't offended anybody. My intelligence is limited to my experiences. Life is shirt. If we are points in space, and we're moving through it, and it doesn't move. That would explain our deterioration. Space transference by forced motion of heat. Heat, your hand in motion. Space, stationary sandpaper. Your hand rubbing across sand paper. Just to much fun trying to figure out basic laws of physics. I would have liked to have been in physics classes. It is a wonderfully challenging field. Gravitational fields of forced motion in a stationary space. We are being forced to the outer limits. We can't go faster than the speed of heat. We are lightning through the resistance of space. Leaving light in our passing. Space vibrates from resistance in waves short and long frequencies.

    • @noisyspaghetti7997
      @noisyspaghetti7997 Před 2 lety

      the difference of pressure allows motion, the difference in temperature allows the transfer of heat. Space allows where, time allows when. all matter is merely energy compressed to a slow vibration. Life is Shirt!

    • @jayy2y128
      @jayy2y128 Před rokem

      This may sound stupid but if I’m interpreting your theory in which heat is the motion that “moves” the entire universe we could be no more than atoms that make up a state of matter in a singular object such as a drop of water or tree bark.. if the universe matters are only moving because of heat or resistance to it then this existence is all just a bunch of atoms( in general terms) making up something. We could be the atomic structure of something a googolplex larger than what we imagine

  • @cpasa798
    @cpasa798 Před rokem

    What if nothing is moving? There is on and off of different particles in space like a giant lake’s surface. Even we are part of it. The universe could be just the exitation of different fields. The perceived “movement” are just waves in the matter’s field.

  • @user-ii1gv1cv2m
    @user-ii1gv1cv2m Před 3 měsíci

    The main cause of the dilemma on how we are to understand or interpret the universe is that our grounding or present or prior knowledge and understanding shackles us to elevate our understanding as we try to progress unto higher and deeper reality of the behavior of things around us.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 10 dny

      Why are you telling us that you failed in high school science class? :-)

  • @janklaas6885
    @janklaas6885 Před 10 měsíci

    📍12:54

  • @adriangheorghe2327
    @adriangheorghe2327 Před 2 lety

    Mecanica cuantica are la baza cuanta (constanta de actiune) notata cu h. La descifrarea semnificatiei fizice a cuantei de actiune (a lui h) rezulta ca este data de produsul dintre energia continuta intro singura unda a fotonului oarecare si durata (lungimea temporara a) fotonului, data de numarul de unde corespunzand la numarul de perioade cuprinse in trenul de unde al unui foton. h=Wlu.Nlu.Tf. unde Wlu este energia continuta intro singura lungime de unda. Wlu=Ufv.If.Tf. ; Nlu este numarul de lungimi de unda continute in trenul de unde al fotonului.; Tf este perioada fotonului.; Ufv este tensiunea de semiunda a fotonului in vid Ufv=Qe/Re=5,686.10^-5 V, pentru oricare foton.; If este curentul eteric al fotonului, curent fara de sarcina electrica, fiind desprins de sarcina elementara care l-a generat, fiind suflat de forta electromagnetica, dar pastrand aceeasi parametri si este dat de relatia If=Qe/Tf. Unde Qe este sarcina electrica elementara.
    Quantum mechanics is based on the quantum (action constant) denoted by h. Deciphering the physical significance of the quantum of action (of h) shows that it is given by the product of the energy contained in a single wave of any photon and the duration (temporary length a) of the photon, given by the wave number corresponding to the number of periods contained in the wave train of a photon. h = Wlu.Nlu.Tf. where Wlu is the energy contained in a single wavelength. Wlu = Ufv.If.Tf. ; Nlu is the number of wavelengths contained in the photon wave train; Tf is the period of the photon .; Ufv is the half-wave voltage of the vacuum photon Ufv = Qe / Re = 5,686.10 ^ -5 V, for any photon .; If is the etheric current of the photon, current without electric charge, being detached from the elementary charge that generated it, being blown by the electromagnetic force, but keeping the same parameters and is given by the relation;
    If = Qe / Tf. Where Qe is the elementary electric charge.

  • @laurendoe168
    @laurendoe168 Před 2 lety +7

    Tsunamis are a strange comparison to light when talking about the frequency's power. A tsunami is much more powerful than the average sea wave, but its wavelength is much longer; probably a couple orders of magnitude longer.

    • @joelw5996
      @joelw5996 Před 2 lety

      But if water was deep enough wouldn’t it propagate the same just more of the wave is below sea level? Would it just be one big wave ?

    • @WeeWeeJumbo
      @WeeWeeJumbo Před 2 lety

      The context was amplitude though, not wavelength

    • @laurendoe168
      @laurendoe168 Před 2 lety

      @@WeeWeeJumbo The context was that shorter wavelengths have more energy.

    • @nihlify
      @nihlify Před 2 lety

      @@laurendoe168 no that wasn't the context....

  • @shivank8368
    @shivank8368 Před 2 lety +6

    It needs more explanation and visualisation, it still look little difficult to understand.. it should adopt new technologies and editing.... But the channel is really awesome...

    • @starcapture3040
      @starcapture3040 Před 2 lety +1

      this is not first episode but taken from the middle

    • @TheGreatCourses
      @TheGreatCourses  Před 2 lety +2

      Thanks, Shivank! This video is part of the "A History of Eastern Europe" lectures. Check them out: www.wondrium.com/a-history-of-eastern-europe

    • @bitkurd
      @bitkurd Před 2 lety

      You don’t have to understand it. You do your heart and other internal organs without understanding them. Knowledge and thinking are disorder but perception only without judgement is order. Language is not something that can explain the nature of the universe, you can not figure out God or Nature or the Universe with only language, you need a deeper understanding by going within but again, you will have a hard time explaining it to other people what is within you 😂 enjoy the dance my friend ☮️ ❤️

    • @BlvdRoad
      @BlvdRoad Před 2 lety

      The problem with grasping fundamental QM is that you need to work out the maths. No video or explanation would be of help without maths

    • @shivank8368
      @shivank8368 Před 2 lety

      @@BlvdRoad i think math is also an imaginary, without numbers it is possible, If one able to imagine it... I can calculate math but i am not able to imagine how it works, i don't know.
      Can you suggest something how to understand it?🤔🤔

  • @deionjumah7099
    @deionjumah7099 Před rokem

    It’s like we’re being toyed with!

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 10 měsíci

      Nah, you are just not smart enough to understand. ;-)

  • @Presidentofstate
    @Presidentofstate Před 2 lety

    Should be a quick and easy video

    • @yecto1332
      @yecto1332 Před 2 lety +1

      U want the most fundamental thing in the universe to be understood quick and easy
      Never happening bro

  • @shashidharshettar3846

    Now I understand better

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 Před 3 měsíci

    Particle or Wave--- or both.?

  • @seabeepirate
    @seabeepirate Před rokem

    Until the missing link is discovered to fill the gap between quantum and classical I don’t see why people feel the need to leave classical physics behind. There’s obviously something important yet to be discovered there.

  • @leonmedenilla6095
    @leonmedenilla6095 Před rokem

    Particles in a speed of light creates waved...

  • @user-km3qw8cc2x
    @user-km3qw8cc2x Před 10 měsíci

    👍

  • @kasulefrancis23
    @kasulefrancis23 Před rokem

    I think the physics world has to call for a debate on the "observe paradox" It's wrong to say that an observer can only be a human as a system is kept in equilibrium by some kind of observation by other elements of that system there fore an observer can be let's say as an example constants in a system or other mathematical relationship between the different parts of that system.Thus the electromagnetic wave can be a particle or a wave irrespective of if we observer it or another particle or wave attempts to achieve equilibrium. This universe has infinite observers observing infinite events. So we need a serious debate on what is an observer?.

  • @Tentonmullet
    @Tentonmullet Před 2 lety

    Did they ever think that the light they used to measure it/ the method they used to measure it interfered with the results?

    • @someoneontheinternet3090
      @someoneontheinternet3090 Před 2 lety +1

      She mentions that, but then says that they reduce the light to the point they get the interference pattern back and it no longer serves it's function of notifying which slit the electron went through. Which just sounds to me like that means it's definitely a good candidate for being the problem.

    • @peterjackson5539
      @peterjackson5539 Před rokem

      en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_eraser_experiment

  • @arthurlevin
    @arthurlevin Před 2 lety

    The photoelectric effect where photons strike a metal like copper and cause photoelectrons to be rejected from the metal can be greatly increased by the inducement of the threshold frequency of copper placed onto it, which will provide a very low resistance to the release and the flow of photoelectrons.

  • @sujeetkumarsanu770
    @sujeetkumarsanu770 Před rokem

    What is photon

  • @BeLovedOfYahusha
    @BeLovedOfYahusha Před 5 měsíci

    Matter changes accordung to who us kooking at it

  • @Tater_killa
    @Tater_killa Před 10 dny

    Lets just say i was born yesterday Lol. I am 30 trying to learn, but what if the slits where made of different materials say, solid black vs. a Reflective surface such as a mirror?

  • @blacked2987
    @blacked2987 Před 2 lety +1

    Wave
    14 52
    17 26

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 Před 3 měsíci

    Quantum Particles--- both particle and wave.!!!

  • @jeffxanders3990
    @jeffxanders3990 Před 2 lety

    Tesla said light can be no more than sound upon the ether.
    Later, Einstein said it's a matter of how He plays dice.

  • @sujeetkumarsanu770
    @sujeetkumarsanu770 Před rokem

    Light has nature like mass

  • @professionalhuman2722
    @professionalhuman2722 Před 10 měsíci

    So the waves are just shy?

  • @TheThomas129
    @TheThomas129 Před 3 měsíci

    Boiler Up

  • @heidiengellenner9651
    @heidiengellenner9651 Před 2 lety

    Kanye- IN FER I OR. Jeididiya- his proposal to lucifer, god the apostles was to prevent my crucifixion this life on earth. All of us watched everything before we came down. We all wondered what Jedidiya was doing? He could not answer.

  • @alfymo
    @alfymo Před 9 měsíci

    As a person who believes that Jesus is who the Bible says He is, and therefore of course, believes in God, I can appreciate this no nonsense, honest approach to this subject. I often hear things explained in a way that seems bias. This acknowledged Einstein’s real perspective which we don’t always see. This to me also indicates that believing in God can actually make you do better science, because I think I have to agree with Einstein, God doesn’t play dice. Much respect to the physicists and whoever else works on this stuff. I believe they are always unlocking more incredible things, including the pursuit of quantum computing right now. I think the more important question is, what will we do with it which becomes a moral question. The implications of such powerful computers is scary. Countries having nuclear bomb power is scary enough and now add this to the mix. “ Fear of the Lord, is the beginning of wisdom.” If people who want to play God control this stuff, we are doomed. There is only one true God. The one who sent Jesus. Sorry to get preachy, again love the video. Easy to understand.

  • @sadovniksocratus1375
    @sadovniksocratus1375 Před rokem

    Cause and effect is omnipresent in our everyday lives, as well as in quantum mechanics.
    And if in modern philosophy this concept (cause and effect) causes controversy,
    then this is due to a misunderstanding of the essence of quantum mechanics.
    ----
    ''If you are not completely confused by quantum mechanics, you do not understand it''
    / John Wheeler /
    ''Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense'' /Roger Penrose/
    "Nobody understands quantum mechanics and that's a problem". /Sean Carroll/

  • @WellOilBeefHooked
    @WellOilBeefHooked Před 2 lety

    What did he say?

  • @adriangheorghe2327
    @adriangheorghe2327 Před 2 lety

    Toata mecanica cuantica a fost edificata pe baza cuantei deactiune h a lui Planck. Dar niciun savant nu a explicat ce este constanta de actiune, ce reflecta ea. Eu am dedus, cand am descifrat sensul fizic al constantei de actiune, ca este data de produsul dintre energia continuta intro singura unda a fotonului oarecare si durata (lungimea temporara) a fotonului, de la prima si pana la ultima unda componenta afotonului.
    All quantum mechanics was built on Planck's h quantum. But no scientist has explained what the constant of action is, what it reflects. I deduced, when I deciphered the physical meaning of the constant of action, that it is given by the product between the energy contained in a single wave of any photon and the duration (temporary length) of the photon, from the first to the last wave of the photon component.

  • @user-eb3kk4hj3x
    @user-eb3kk4hj3x Před 8 měsíci

    Quantum mechanics
    QM describes behavior of particles & waves at quantum level where classical laws no longer apply
    QED describes how electron & photon interact with each other
    QED underpins technologies such as GPS system, lasers, semiconductors
    "Quantum mechanics makes absolutely no sense" /Penrose/

  • @KartikPatel-nt4ff
    @KartikPatel-nt4ff Před měsícem

    😅😮😅😅😮😅😮😅😅😅😅😅😅well information good show you can 😅😅😅

  • @charlesdrury9712
    @charlesdrury9712 Před 2 lety +1

    Sorry I think what he is saying it’s just an analogy we’re going about the intensity of the Waveland order versus particle it’s just an analogy to help you to understand I do not mean to insult you I have no degrees

    • @charlesdrury9712
      @charlesdrury9712 Před 2 lety +2

      Sorry a lot of typos that shows you I’m not too smart it is a analogy regardless of the energy just to show you and help you understand

    • @charlesdrury9712
      @charlesdrury9712 Před 2 lety

      😍

  • @81giorikas
    @81giorikas Před 2 lety

    One photon at a time lol.
    But light has no time to lose, going so fast...

  • @melissahelsel4728
    @melissahelsel4728 Před 7 měsíci

    *brain explodes*

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 Před 9 dny

    Photons

  • @yecto1332
    @yecto1332 Před 2 lety +1

    Just one simple question why is there no image or photo in internet of which way experiment where the interference pattern changes into only two image of photon
    Why is so hard for scientists to give us the evidence for their claim

    • @imkuntox
      @imkuntox Před 2 lety

      You are meant to be bamboozled with complex theories, and just trust scientists understand everything, and you are just a simpleton that can never understand unless the theory is condescendingly shown with computer graphics, and not the "evidence" which is ultimately, just a mathematical equation. There is no real demonstrable evidence to show.Just trust and believe the scientism

  • @W2LTA
    @W2LTA Před rokem

    Shouldn't an explanation start at the very start. Planck time, particle types etc. Anyhow still good watching now to look for the basics (so they can be explained)

  • @rgc121044
    @rgc121044 Před rokem

    Beautifully explained. But Particle Duality doesn't exist. Lets look at photons first: when an EM wave hits matter, matter absorbs a quantum of energy, it extracts it from the wave but it is not that a photon with that energy is traveling instead of the EM wave. Afraid of being redundant, it is the energy configuration of matter that works on the wave. Photons don't exist. Now lets take on electrons: when an airplane flies under the speed of sound a sound wave precedes it and announces the plane is coming. Electrons cannot reach the speed of light so an EM wave precedes its flight ... and don't forget that the front of the EM wave is "relativistic matter" that bends space so a gravitational wave also accompanies it. It is all waves, particle wave duality doesn't exist.

  • @aku7598
    @aku7598 Před 9 měsíci

    Will the universe we live in today exist if quantum particles are deterministic?

  • @benquinneyiii7941
    @benquinneyiii7941 Před 9 dny

    The ancient wisdom

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla8711 Před 3 měsíci

    'Physics is everything' guy is right, QM is incomplete, according to Einstein, as QM isn't a theory, it is a set of principles. 100 years later Maldacena conjectured that error correcting QC function is the complete theory. The algorithm of 'error correction' is what is holding us from a complete knowledge how the universe simulate life and consciousness.

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 10 dny

      And why are you telling us that you weren't paying attention in school? :-)

  • @sujeetkumarsanu770
    @sujeetkumarsanu770 Před rokem

    quantum computer work on quantum mekanism

  • @riddlescom
    @riddlescom Před 2 lety

    I have a quantum computer.
    Everytime I look at it .
    It breaks.
    When use it . I have to close my eyes.

  • @manjunathhegde7737
    @manjunathhegde7737 Před rokem

    what happens when you have only 1 slit and shoot single photons through them. Is the resulting pattern wave or particle?

  • @Jezee213
    @Jezee213 Před 2 lety

    This video knocked me on my keister.

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 Před 3 měsíci

    Electrons behave like PARTICLE/WAVE.--- both???

  • @rockjerry3398
    @rockjerry3398 Před 2 lety +2

    It looks like early 90’s tv show…hard for students to learn

  • @jimmythompson9677
    @jimmythompson9677 Před rokem

    why the hell they switch speakers mid lecture. that was annoying.

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 Před 3 měsíci

    Shocked by QUANTUM THEORY!!

  • @dnshfzi
    @dnshfzi Před rokem

    came here because this thing got into the high school silibus.

  • @Tentonmullet
    @Tentonmullet Před 2 lety +1

    I think it's a wave but the light that you are using to measure it is altering the result not some spooky meta physical thing

  • @Sharperthanu1
    @Sharperthanu1 Před 10 měsíci

    I have news for you.If you sat or lied down in a room with absolutely no light in it and no other consciousnesses in it the wave function of your entire body and everything around you would still collapse because you could still function.

  • @theyshouldhavenevergivenme5439

    the excellent scientific explanation is in stark contrast with the ..uhm production design of this thing. some of these backdrops are super tacky and not well thought out it boggles the mind (@08:29 what is that? Anyone ;)). it makes it all feel quaint like watching some late 80s VHS of a science programme. I know, I know it's not really important. just weird.

    • @TheGreatCourses
      @TheGreatCourses  Před rokem

      Thank you for bringing this to our attention, your feedback is invaluable to us! We are always looking for ways to improve our services and will share your feedback internally.

  • @mosharrafkhan6072
    @mosharrafkhan6072 Před rokem

    MHKhan
    The Deliberation is not about Quantum physics explained its all about what is not explained / Watch out for Explanation

  • @tonymessinajr
    @tonymessinajr Před 2 lety

    Why can't waves actually be made of photons, yes what if waves are photons

    • @schmetterling4477
      @schmetterling4477 Před 2 lety

      Waves are made of photons. It simply takes many photons to make a wave.

  • @atiqrahman7289
    @atiqrahman7289 Před 3 měsíci

    Quantum PHYSICS, QUANTUM MECHANICS.

  • @user-ii1gv1cv2m
    @user-ii1gv1cv2m Před 3 měsíci

    "He does not play dice" but He has only the master design of the totally of the universe. Having it discovered by any human being is million times impossible or will negate the main character of God, that He is the only God of the universe.

  • @RagingGeekazoid
    @RagingGeekazoid Před 2 lety

    Except "electrons" and "photons" never act like particles except when they interact with other things. So they may still be waves, and it may be the interactions between them that are quantized. 😉

  • @belowasmelashgebremariam

    Keney ke

  • @zishananjum6125
    @zishananjum6125 Před 2 lety

    Excellent, atleast they both agreed on God. Science will continue to uncover new theories

  • @RONJAE212003
    @RONJAE212003 Před 11 měsíci

    Light isn’t everywhere. Deep space is black

  • @monstertruck652
    @monstertruck652 Před 2 lety

    The greedy airbus problematically haunt because improvement mathematically intend failing a daily gold. superficial, plastic gasoline