Deal or No Deal Update on Iran’s Nuclear Program
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- Our panelists discussed the Biden administration’s ongoing negotiations to rejoin the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) following the Trump administration’s 2018 withdrawal, and the role of other actors in the negotiation process, including Russia and Israel.
Subscribe to our channel: goo.gl/WCYsH7
The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher.
Visit the CFR website: www.cfr.org
Follow CFR on Twitter: / cfr_org
Follow CFR on Facebook: / councilonforeignrelations
A war with Iran would cost thousands of American lives and Israel is ready and willing to make that sacrifice.
Israel doesn't want a war. Iran does.
@@toby9999 I haven't seen any Iranians in America lobbying for us to attack Israel.
Ha ha ha hilarious !!!
@@toby9999 I haven't seen any Iranians in Congress lobbying for the US to attack Israel.
Hey Corey, I'm iranian and I can easily say that iran won't last 1 week of war against any country let alone U.S!!! Iran has no military and has no air force since 1979
what wrong propaganda question 7:11 it's so funny you call it a violation by Iran! Iran never Violated the Deal
CAN'T BELIEVE THEY OPEN THE COMMENT SECTION
How can you talk for 45 minutes about Iran nuclear programme without a mention of Israeli nuclear weapons.
Because the topic isn't Israel man. Apples and oranges. Israel doesn't go around threatening all of it's neighbors and even questioning it's neighbor's right to even exist. If your neighbor threatened to kill you, would you want them to buy a bazooka? I am really surprised that someone who flashes a peace sign and dove (I'm also a hippie but a realist as well) would want to defend a repressive, homophobic, violent, theocratic, misogynistic, anti-drug/cognitive freedom, anti-human rights, anti-democratic state that supports terror not only against Israel and the US but against many of it's fellow Arab nations. Do even realize why Israel believes that they need nuclear weapons? Because they have been threatened and attacked so many times over the years. Jews came to Israel seeking a homeland after long never having one and after suffering age-old repression simply because they were always in the minority because they didn't evangelize and embrace colonialism like the Christians and Muslims did. They create Israel after the Holocaust and you want to question their right to defend themselves against an aggressor that states that they have no right to exist? Come on man, you are making hippies look dumb.
The issue is not that straight forward that these folks been talking about. Tell us what we already don’t know!
Iranians don't respond well to threats , use more carrots less sticks and these differences will be ironed out in no time.
smart comment
The best course of action is for Iran to leave the NPT now since it is getting hit by Israel anyways and if the US asks her to rejoin the talks, the price will be pretty clear: 1-reissue the sanctions' waivers to Iran's main oil buyers like China, India and Japan and South Korea. 2-Ask Israel to consider joining the NPT.
How about few minutes on Israel nuke program
This delusional conversation explain alot of why america has lost support from ordinary people around the world, so sad to see it continue.
Why should ordinary people around the world support the USA? What's in it for them? More importantly, what's your definition of 'the world'?
@@paulheydarian1281 It is not that people have to support america. It is the scale in which america has lost that support since say 911 and this discuss in the video is so far away from what people can clearly determine from the facts which adds to the loss. It seems like talking points from 20 years ago without any consideration that things have changed or that the internet exist.
This conversation has been entirely unimaginitive! How thoroughly limited in creative thinking and consideration of new approaches? If there's one thing I learned as a psychiatrist working with my patients is that I should never, ever say 'I am not going to allow you to x, y or z'. This is effectively what we are saying to the Iranians. They will do what they want. The best way is to find approaches that permit cooperation.
I don't believe Iran is interested in cooperation. You said it yourself... "They will do what they want".
@@robby3467 The start of any conversation that can ever be considered legitimate starts by the sides recognizing each other as having the right and one might even say the responsibility of acting in ways each side sees best.
@@robby3467 and yet they did cooperate in a deal before, which then was kicked into the gonats by the US under Trump, while making allies into liers
It is not about only doing what they want though, but doing inspite of what they are told. Especially when it comes from the US with its history of interference in Iran and also lately of breaking a treaty. If only hardliners in the US have their say, then naturally opponents will rise to the challange.
As an aspiring physician with a very perfuse passion for IR/Foreign Policy, this comment is so awesome to read! Thank you for your work Doctor!
Everyone agrees getting back on the JCPOA is good but no one believes we should take the tiniest measure to capitulate to Iran to make that happen.
Not only that, there was an agreement in place already that Trump pulled back just because he didn’t have his name on it and now Biden is dragging his feet. He could issues an executive order when he came to office and that would be that, restore some credibility to American foreign policy!
'Capitulate to Iran?' 😜🤪🤣 Sorry...Eye-ran. Just imagine how this idea is going to go down in the U.S. Senate...!!!
@@paulheydarian1281 you sound like a butthurt with that weird name!
Now what guys?
Elliot Abrams sounds the smartest but is in fact the one who is full of contradictions. He talks about how the deal should have been a treaty and such and when the lady tells him hey bro we pulled out of treaties too, he brings up Obama turning down Bush's promise to Israel because it was not a treaty. In other words it should only be a treaty when it suits his political agenda but not when it doesn't. How convenient? Also he keeps bringing up the IRGC wanting to kill Pompeo and Pence to argue for their terrorist designation while completely forgetting that this is a new development that resulted directly from the fact that Trump put them on the terrorist list prior to killing Soleimani. In other words, they don't have much to lose since they're damned either way. He sounds a lot smarter than he is and is the most emotional. Bob Einhorn seems the one who is best informed about all this, not that I agree with any one of them. Their hypocrisy towards Israel's nukes and the fact that America doesn't even ask them to consider joining the NPT speaks volumes as to who they really are.
Israeli Illegal Nuclear Weapons???
For the Iranians, it is a win-win situation whatever the outcome will be.
Iran wants nuclear weapons and Iran will have nuclear weapons. It's just a case of when.
@@toby9999 If the world wants peace in the Middle East then Iran must become a nuclear state, otherwise, the US and the Israelis will do to the Middle East population what they did to the native Americans.
@@toby9999 you are absolutely wrong. Nuclear weapon doesn’t guarantee deterrence anymore as long as you can protect yourself and retaliate against any attacks by other means. Iran has that capability and proved that on so many occasions. What Iran wants is to be a member global market. This could pour billions of dollars into iranian economy and help the regime in advancing their regional ambitions. This is the main reason Israel and other regional rivals are so against Jcpoa. If it was the nuke they should have been supportive since the agreement could monitor Iran’s nuclear activity.
@@mr.b5583 dud America just doesn't worth the effort anymore there is just two thing Iran can get out of this it's money or the nuke. There is not going to be investment or anything good so I personally prefer the nuke . We can just change the world in our good and remake the global economy whiteout our enemies anoying us
How so?
look how much the Iranians are playing with the Americans
I love how you guys keep ignoring the fact the early on they stated they are going to use nukes to destroy the little Satan and the big Satan
Does anyone else get notifications for this channel even though they never subscribed? It says I am but no one else uses this acct and I know I didn't subscribe
What guarantee can you give to iran,as long US is liable partner, another President can come and cancel every agreement like Trump did,the best thing Iran can do join the BRICS have their own swift that's all, Russia is winning with the rubles Iran can too
DEVILS IN THE DETAILS 🎱🇺🇲🐍
Наші хлопці ЗСУ НАЙКРУТІШІ✊ В СВІТІ. РФ. ПРОГРАЛА ВІДЕО czcams.com/video/XYptFwrHQWc/video.html 💞ВІРЕМО В ПЕРЕМОГУ СЛАВА УКРАЇНІ! ГЕРОЯМ СЛАВА💙💛
Military intervention is the only way to stop the nuclear problem. Sounds harsh but it's the only way I see right now. Nuclear is not a weapon that everyone should have. Look at Russia, a big problem.
I think a solution could be no one country should have nuclear weapons, nuclear should exist but the only entity that should have nuclear is the U.N.
So all countries should submit all of their nuclear weapons to the U.N. any country that refuses would have extremely extreme sanctions laid against it.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
If *you* only see one solution, its not because there aren't any other solutions.
Iran is unstoppable even the military option wont succeed
Yes Israel should go on and invade Iran, they have enough soldiers to risk. America is not obligated or needed
@@kinngrimm true, do you see any other?