Professor John Searle's 50 Years at UC Berkeley - A Celebration

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 7. 04. 2009
  • A celebration of John Searle's 50 years of distinguished service to the UC Berkeley campus, with reflections by Tom Nagel, Barry Stroud, Robert Cole, Alex Pines, Peter Hanks, and Maya Kronfeld.
    Recorded February 23, 2009
    socrates.berkeley.edu/~jsearle/
    philosophy.berkeley.edu/jrsevent
    Sponsors: UC Berkeley; Philosophy Department philosophy.berkeley.edu

Komentáře • 14

  • @FB1801
    @FB1801 Před 14 lety +1

    One of the greatest thinkers of our time.

  • @MrPatrickDayKennedy
    @MrPatrickDayKennedy Před 8 lety

    There is a lot of love in this room, and wisdom :) Thank you for posting this!

  • @degenkek
    @degenkek Před 9 lety +5

    I came here for Barry Stroud. #barrystroud
    Oh yeah, Searle is pretty cool too.

  • @dandiacal
    @dandiacal Před 15 lety

    Thank you very much manwaring!

  • @countmagnus08
    @countmagnus08 Před 12 lety

    1:37:50, very funny and well-observed.

  • @dandiacal
    @dandiacal Před 15 lety +1

    John Searle is so underrated. While everyone is falling for Dennett's reductionism, he keeps everyone honest. The Chines Room argument is a knock-down, drag-out argument.

    • @science212
      @science212 Před rokem

      Dennett is a great thinker.
      Leonard Peikoff is good too.

  • @manwaring
    @manwaring Před 15 lety

    Why the hell are people marking this comment down? There are genuine arguments against Dennett's reductionism, in no way is Searle an idiot for rejecting it.

    • @science212
      @science212 Před rokem

      Dennett is a great philosopher. Human brain is just a computer. Reductionism is right.

  • @ArcadianGenesis
    @ArcadianGenesis Před 14 lety

    @dianep123 If anything, your comment fits Searle's accusation that the only people who tend to disagree with his philosophy (biological naturalism) are those who dogmatically adhere to old, traditional philosophical terminology and categories. The only reason why you think the homunculus is ridiculous is that you keep calling it the homunculus. This is an ancient term which has no relevance to Searle's philosophy. He simply claims that consciousness is ontologically irreducible.

  • @science212
    @science212 Před rokem

    Maya is beautiful.

  • @science212
    @science212 Před rokem

    Searle is wrong. The brain is a computer.

    • @PCH12r
      @PCH12r Před rokem

      oh here we goo :D