Why Canon Remains #1 In Camera Industry
Vložit
- čas přidán 8. 09. 2024
- Canon has been the #1 camera brand since the beginning of time. They were neck and neck with Nikon for awhile, but pulled away. Now Sony is on their heals. This is why people still choose Canon, despite them not always having the best specs.
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a dolphin will carry you to an island where Canon teamed up with Sony to make the R1c. 4k 240p raw 12 bit 4:4:4. Only in Sepia colour though.
Canon EOS R amzn.to/3fI7PL9 or bhpho.to/3qYtdPC or USED bhpho.to/3oxvMGV
Canon 24mm f1.4 L ii (I own the mark i, hard to find) amzn.to/3UmifPi or USED amzn.to/3UhAeXj or bhpho.to/3H2QMiGf or USED bhpho.to/3gMY3bR
Sony A7S III amzn.to/3gkmDzS or USED amzn.to/3TxLuhZ or bhpho.to/3yeUW0q
Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 amzn.to/3inwBS5 or USED SUPER CHEAP amzn.to/3Ui9Zjt
Instagram / vegetablepolice
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com...
Patreon for Monthly Q&A Videos / vegetablepolice
T-shirts and merch! vegetablepolic...
My Monkey Strength ebook payhip.com/b/VyEG
My Music from videos! Entire Discography 15% off vegetablepolic...
Random ass donations to paypal.me/vegetablepolice Thank you!
Q-Link Products changed my life! share.shopqlin...
My Health Channel Vegetable Police / canadianwargod
My Music Channel Stern Beats / @sternbeatsmusic - Komedie
If you buy today's gear through my affiliate links, a dolphin will carry you to an island where Canon teamed up with Sony to make the R1c. 4k 240p raw 12 bit 4:4:4. Only in Sepia colour though.
Canon EOS R amzn.to/3fI7PL9 or bhpho.to/3qYtdPC or USED bhpho.to/3oxvMGV
Canon 24mm f1.4 L ii (I own the mark i, hard to find) amzn.to/3UmifPi or USED amzn.to/3UhAeXj or bhpho.to/3H2QMiGf or USED bhpho.to/3gMY3bR
Sony A7S III amzn.to/3gkmDzS or USED amzn.to/3TxLuhZ or bhpho.to/3yeUW0q
Zeiss Batis 25mm f2 amzn.to/3inwBS5 or USED SUPER CHEAP amzn.to/3Ui9Zjt
Instagram instagram.com/vegetablepolice/
All my gear and recommended products can be found in my affiliate shop, thanks for shopping around! www.amazon.com/shop/vegetablepolice
Just buy Alexa Joel Famularo Lut mate, it fixed the colour. That's the only lut that works. If it isn't for that. I sell Sony and jump back to Canon
Try using a Ninja V on the Canon and 10 bit is yours..glory
McDonalds sells the most hamburgers, doesn't mean they have the best burgers. Having been a former Canon, Fujifilm and Olympus user, I can say that Canon may be the #1 seller, but definitely isn't the best. Not by a long shot.
I don't think Canon is even the best for a specific type of photographer. Sony is the best for indoor, studio and controlled climate photographers. Nikon is the best for outdoor photographers who often shoot in bad weather conditions, those who shoot with long telephoto primes and those who want to save some money (versus Sony or Canon). Fujifilm is the best for APS-C lovers. Leica is the best for rich dentists. Canon is the best at nothing.
@@Anon-zl4ne i think canon is the best at those who wants the best looking stills and videos shot at jpgs and standard , if you want your pics and video straight out of the camera i think canon is the best at doing that
Only camera channel I watch where I smile the whole time. Thanks kemosabe.
I have been out of the photography game for years. But I still watch this stuff for the driest of delivery styles anyone could ever ask for. For that, I thank you Sir!
"Next to me is a broken man, with a broken spirit, he has no goals in life, he made mistakes, he regrets every one of them...." *WHEW* Yup, that's what *SHE* said....
😂😂😂
🤧
The cripple hammers cameo was spot on 👌🏼😅
I definitely enjoy shooting FHD/480fps on my vintage Canon EF SLRs -- the tough part is getting the correct film....
Lets see that GH6 vs the Canon. I am loving the GH6 skin tones straight out of camera.
I shoot on BGH1 and agree. Panasonic image on my BGH1 has more film character than my A7IV. But A7IV has better autofocus and colors are great.
@@noxtrom GH6 stepped the colors up a notch over my other Panasonics. BGH1 is still awsome!
Your difficulty grading C-Log is actually a good reason to try one of the new models that have C-Log 3. Once you have 3, you'll always feel free.
I almost switched to Sony when I contemplated going mirrorless. At the time I had a 5D Mark IV. When I compared the R to the A7 III, the R had lesser specs for $400 USD more (it's way cheaper now, of course). But it felt nice in my hand. The Sony felt like a dinky, boxy toy. They're fixated on keeping the camera small. Canon has always understood ergonomics and usability. So I waited for Canon to put out a better mirrorless body. When they did, I pounced without regret.
I have both an R5 and R6 now. I don't need the R6 II because of the R5. Now, if the R5 Mark II rumor comes true, I might consider trading in the R6.
Another thing about the Sonys: the media. The CF Express A cards are slower, limited in capacity, and much more expensive than the Type B. The Sony body and lenses may be less expensive, but buy a couple of CFE-A cards and that difference is gone.
Fair. Sony's do feel like cheap plastic toys. I have large hands and they feel horrible. I understand what Sony was trying to do with the CF Express type As, but give us some better priced cards please!!
I still think as a straight "youtubers" camera the A7s3 or Fx3 are the easiest to get a great image out of. And they have the most complete mirrorless lenses selections. If only Panasonic would give me phase detect or lidar, I would be complete. Last night I rolled the dice and left my S5 on CAF with a 50mm at 1.8. Looks like it worked great. But I was sweating bullets and I don't need that anymore.
For my needs, 1080p/30 does a fine job in MP4. Not perfect but pretty dang good.
@@FlatWaterFilms Its all about your needs. I have to punch in a lot, so the higher the resolution the better. But if your just shooting a face with a shallow depth of field the way bitrates work you can get by with 720p looking decent.
John shoots a lot of wide landscapes. I bet 4k looks a lot better than 1080 in that case as well.
@@jessecumberledge4530 yes, 4K looks way better on a 4K monitor or 4K TV. Viewers on a phone, which is the majority, are unlikely to notice the difference unless they're extremely nearsighted and can see the screen without glasses from 6 inches away. Actually, that's me. 😉😂
@@jessecumberledge4530 there's no denying the Sony video IQ, and the FX-30 should definitely please video-centric Sony users. And yes, DFDAF remains Panasonic's Achilles heel; they're great otherwise from everything I've seen.
I've been at the same point as you, comparing my EOS R to Sony Cameras and always preferred the Canon image over Sony. However, this was with EF glass only. As soon as I bought into RF glass I was so disappointed that I sold the Canon system. RF glass produces imho a shift in colour towards orange. The look was also way more digital as with EF glass. I could even see the shift with some CZcamsrs like Potatoe Jet or Matti when they started to use RF glass. Would be interesting to put your EF 24 1.4 on your A7SIII with a MC-11 adapter (no continuous AF though).
Sony colors are worse.
LOL
Cowboy Smoker LUT😄. Ironically this is the best Sony has ever looked in one of your videos.
I’m pretty happy with my R6, files aren’t too big the auto focus never fails me. the 16-35 L and 24-105 L live on my cameras. Study Gama Curves of learn to grade log better.
Very pleased that you have a decent lens for the EOS R now - hopefully we will start seeing the potential of the Canon in your hands. It would be interesting to see how Topaz goes upscaling the 1080p 60 p to 4K 120p now that you have a lens that can autofocus.
The EF 24m 1.4 I looks really pleasing indeed. would love to see that on an R5 or R3
Sheet it's nice to see you've come around to the R. I also own the A7S3, GH5 and the New OM1 but keep coming back to the R for familiarity and better menu system. I always know where everything is on my Canon R and since IMO nothing after the R from Canon has impressed me or even made me want to upgrade. I've chosen to invest in better Glass until Canon stops making Cameras with overheating issues.
Wow that's a great lens the Canon 24mm 1.4 L!
If you buy the R5, R6 of R6II the autofocus is also beyond perfect!
I gotta admit, I like when the cripple hammer hits you all up beside your head @ 5:34. Sub’ed for more cripple hammer, we need more damned CRIPPLE HAMMER!
This is one of your best and realistic vlogs...photography is not about auto focus...it's about the outcome. Having Sony, Canon, Fuji and Olympus/Panosonic kits...I always prefer the Canon outcomes. Toneh ha ha!
Your CLOG is probably orange because in Canon Log Settings your Color Matrix is probably set to Cinema EOS Original. Choose Neutral it’s better
4:59
I like how the Cripple Hammer's entry always reminds me of the Skyfall soundtrack. A movie I love for many personal reasons other than being a cinephile.
That movie is sick.
I still own and use an EOS 650. It's a great camera :)
Kasey, you are right. The Canon Eos R looks much better than the Sony. I prefer 1080p over 4K. I don’t need to be seeing anybody’s pores. It’s distracting. Keep up the great work Kasey.
Sony Zv1- auto mode with medium facial smoothing = even acne ridden turtle face turns into a korean model out if camera.
Trust- i have the camera and the bad skin.
That Toneh shirt is pretty amazing to be honest. Bravo, sir.
We LOVE our Canon Eos R. Its a superb camera!!!
I don’t care about sharpness, but extra DR on my Canon would be nice as would a S35 mode. Honestly ARRI just need to make a simple photo/video came that’s cheap with basic AF and i’d just buy that lol
I`d take a cheap one even without AF :D
another brilliant video, this guy cracks me up!
12:56 expose to the right. In the meeter go over one notch or two C-Log works better when over exposed by one 1.5 stops
5:37 I literally LOL’d. Nice tonehature from the 24 1.4.
I was contemplating gifting you one of my Z9 bodies until you voiced your animosity toward Nikon,as such I am now uncontemplating my generosity, hows that Sony Boy.!!!!!!!!!
I also Loved my EOS 650 and 620!
clog 3 on the r5 is very easy to edit, shoot it in ipb too and you shouldnt have any editing speed issues either.
I liked when you switched to 4k because eyes were finally sharp, and its much more pleasing to look at.
Your skin is fine!
I’m a hobbyist landscape, street-life and wildlife photographer and committed DSLR user. I’ve seen Nikon cameras as well. They are good. Sony is the worst in all possible ways.
To me Canon in the best due to its realistic colors, easy operability, great lens options and processing software support. Last but not least important; the pro bodies are extremely durable and reliable. I procured used 5D, 5DII, 5DIII, 1DIV and 7D with tons of shutter life remaining. I expect all of them last many years more. Use native lenses, have nine of those.
So, why should I think about gears of other brands? My time is far better spent developing new ideas, compositions etc. for my future images. I’m purely a still photographer.
Thank you for the video.
I agree about Canon color. I have only used a Canon camcorder, not a camera, but the feeling the color gave me was special and emotionally pleasing. I know Sony works better for autofocus, but I like my fujifilm now.
I think the main issue why some people are having a hard time getting an accurate color from sony is that sony tend to hide the profile/color space that gives the most accurate color. The standard picture profile sony provides is good but not accurate enough and for some people who are new to sony, it might be their default settings. The most accurate picture profile/color space for sony comes from (picture profile off with neutral creative look) or from (Slog3 with Sgamut3.cine). I agree it should be more accessible straight out of the box and not be hidden like a secret setting but I think it might beat canon's color accuracy if you set it on those specifc sony color space/picture profile.
Nice magenta/purple tint ! Canon colors.
I picked Nikon over Canon in 1986 and I'm not changing now. Back then Canons had weird menus. I had an FM2 and loved it.
I picked Nikon because everyone around me was shooting Canon, and I wanted to be different in a sense. I also love Nikon menu system and ergonomics, as well as naming lens choice.
Now my goal is to upgrade to D850 for photos and one of the Z cameras for video. Nikon is getting it right in terms of AF with the Z lineup, so future is looking bright for us that use Nikon.
@@astanisystems as I remember it (but it was a long time ago) Nikons back in those days had rotary dials to select things, whereas the Canons had buttons and you had to look at the LCD screen on top to see what they were doing. At the time I think I had a Praktica so Nikon felt a bit more familiar.
@@PJ-om2wq Yeah, but Nikon is still superior in terms of design and ergonomics compared to other brands. Nikon cameras have a distinctive look, unlike Canon with a blank black theme. Not that anything's wrong with them, it's just that Canon cameras look simple and dull compared to Nikon's.
Also, older generation always praises Nikon, so whenever I was doing a shoot that included elderly people, they would always praise my for using Nikon and were generally saying good things about my system choice. This goes to say that Nikon is the OG in camera world, where Canon is mid, and Sony is the new kid on the block. Leica, Hasselblad, Fuji, Lumix, and Pentax, I don't know about those, they might all be grouped together with Canon.
My gravy, do you ever know words! Bro, you're the most fun I have on CZcams, most days. Thanks. Also; maybe that EOS R5 at the pawn shop wasn't a bad look... Who knew?
I think I may have entered and alt-universe where I have sometimes over the course of this video realized I prefer the sony image on your face :D
R6ii looks like it has absolute bonkers AF, especially for wildlife.
I know it sounds basic, but I import my Sony footage into Apple's photo app and use the auto-correct. It actually does a pretty good job. Simple, but works! Takes away the pale complexion and makes me look a bit tan like I'm a living person outside of the Adams Family.
Tonéh shirt. Thats the massive improvement for every CZcamsr
In my Sony A6600 I just put it in Auto 🐠 and it will correct my white balance for indoor shots that have artifish light and natural.
That's just total BS, Kasey!
1.) You know that "lived in cowboy look" offered by Sony, suits you better.
2.) The lens to make you look younger has not been designed yet.
3.) Sony auto focus nails those zits instantaneously. Canon is still playing catch up hours later. Doesn't know which zit to pick.
4.) Your vocab improves when you talk Sony.
I'm off to Polin's channel. At least he has nice hair.
Learning how to get what you want from your existing gear is far more skilful that buying your way to click and done.
Minolta built some seriously good film cameras back in the day. They were my intro to photography. Smooth crisp lenses, beautifully built bodies, great photos as farvas film could. Mum had a Canon around the same time and it was horrible in comparison, much MUCH worse, lens was junk, cripple hammer at it even way back then on some models at least. RIP Minolta.
I just got the R6 mark 2
I'll let you know how it is
Excellent colors!!
Slog3 to Canon colour look best .
The main reason Sony footage is unflattering is that I believe they sharpen the mid tones on the A7SIII and FX3- try using the midtone detail slider in Resolve to soften them. It could help without making the image look like mush.
My clients want Sony, so this is the main reason I bought the FX6 alongside the VND and I/O- it doesn’t have that issue despite using the same sensor. I wonder if external recordings from the A7SIII with a Ninja V would solve this problem.
The Canon makes it look like you've got sunburn in November! I'm sticking with Sony, thanks!
Expose to the right on C-log or one stop brighter for less noise. Because metering mode is wide, you can't rely on Histogram 100% as you would rely on zebras. I just checked on my EOS R and it doesn't have zebras on either photo or video mode which is disappointing. It force you to use an external monitor to expose perfectly. You're welcome. Thanks for sharing!
Also you definitely need to up the level of your light. ISO 400 supposed to give you the cleaner image but not when underexpose.
😂 Casey saw the light! 😂 never seeing so many contradictions in 16 minutes
Canon has been around forever. They have had a leg up on the field forever. Like Nokia's demise, I forsee Canon being usurped by Sony in the next 15 years. Canon, like Nokia, is way too cocky. I have a Sony a 7s 3. But my first choice, at the time was, the R5. Canon blew it. The overheating, the codecs, the file sizes - it was a mess. A lot of my friends got Sony cameras at that time too. Now, we see how good the auto focus is, the broad lens selection, the articulating screen and other amenities. Color science is not even an issue for the most part. There is a lut for everything. Besides that, for me at least, I don't even use s log. I tweak film color straight out of the camera in the basic profile. So "for me" the fact that there is so much already built into Sony camera's right out of the box - and they work. No recalls or waiting on firmware updates to be able to use my $4,500 dream camera that over heats and loses me gigs. (The cripple hammer is reaaaaaal). Canon is still riding high "now" but new consumers are having Sony as their first camera now and Sony will become their chosen ecosystem going forward. Not even giving Canon a shot at their business.
After 2 Canon cameras and 3 lenses failing, I would consider Canon as#1in disappointment. I still have my original Olympus Digital and film cameras and 2 Panasonic point and shoots that have lasted past the point of obsolescence. I bought the Canon cameras because of the name and they let me down hard. The best camera I will ever own will be the Panasonic GH-10
The final image of Canon vs Fuji, who would win?
Could you test the Phantom Luts for Sony? I would realy like your opinion. - Btw. I prefer HLG (I think it's picture profile 10) for my rosacea tortured face.
OMG the mk ii is so much sharper and focuses much faster.
It lacks character.
@@cameraconspiracies For someone who has just discovered the magic of Canon colour, you sure know a lot about the 24 L II! I"ll be sure to sell it and get the Mark I.
7:52-8:30 genius at work. 🤣
What monitor do you have for your PC? I think it's really affecting your view on Sony's and everyone else' color science.
Even without a calibrated monitor you can tell the Sony colors look bad
Hah thanks for mentioning the 650. I just picked one up 😂
I recently bought a Canon R5 C. It's great; I'm really happy with the purchase. You'd probably like it if you had some time to play around with one. Need to use it with stabilized lenses, though. No IBIS, battery life is shit (meant to be rigged up), and I had to refinance my house to buy it. LOL
I made a bunch of videos with it.
Thank you for going over all the reasons I do not shoot canon.
😂 this ^^^ 100% truth.
At this point the only cannon camera casey has was gifted to him.
that's the best shirt
You are making wise choices.... now you need a Canon vlogging lens, and if you're going outside you'll need a Telephoto lens as well... and bin for the Sony
Which lens is and camera are best for shooting wildlife on cannon?
I am waiting for the Toneh 1 on 1 interview. In an awkward isolated cavern.
Canon just flatters you and your skin tones. Sony tells you the truth. LoL Sort of like Kodak film used to do in the bad old days what with their over-saturated reds to make people look "healthier".
Best t-shirt ever! Was it a Toneh 0.95?
Had Canon in the 90's Always wanted Nikon because it was perceived as quality, Canon for Sport, Nikon for art, well that was my take anyway :) Only just got into digital..funny taking thousands of pictures with no worries, it's a different thing now. The Nikon Z range is pretty cool. Sony I'll leave for the gamers.... for now :) They all give us great technology.
Any modern day camera can get the job done. But I'm switching to Sony because I refuse to pay thousands more for canon lenses because canon will not allow any other company to make lenses for their RF cameras.
Where can I download the Cowboy Smoker LUT? 😆
Canon remains no 1 because they were always no 1(top market share before Sony even arrived). Close to half of the Canon sale is still dslr's.
M series. M50 has been telling the highest numbers ....
@@The_Idea_of_Dream_Vision yeah, that's the segment that everyone misses.
7:58 ughh I felt that.
You have all of these cameras, why don’t yup shoot a comedy movie. You’re crazy man😂😂😂
Have you considered getting a spray tan to make your skin tones more favorable
Someone send him an m2 MacBook Pro with Final Cut.
Canon bodies are also better than Sony bodies. Better ergonomics, better quality feel, and better weather sealing. I'm struggling on whether to buy the Sony A7RV or wait for the Canon R5 Mark II
Have you heard of the sony a1?
Eric Lenz created a Sony LUT called EOS Alpha. It will rock your world. Film in SLOG3, custom WB 300K below what Sony thinks is correct for gray card. Then in Davinci, pull back the LUT intensity to about 70% and add a touch of grain. Welcome to the cinema my friend. You’re welcome. 😊
You're welcome? You mean this LUT? czcams.com/video/KTDtS3l-qZE/video.html One of the worst LUTS I've ever tried lol. Completely ruined my footage.
@@cameraconspiracies 🤣Mine looks nothing like that. But at least u tried it.
As an owner of 4 Canon EF L lenses (In love with all of them) I sometimes wonder if switching to mirrorless with an ef/RF adapter is a wise choice. My 7d M2 has a main dial problem and I hope Canon can get it fixed
am still rocking my 7d mark1 til this day and that camera can still produce some nice output til this day
I'm wondering why you haven't used the ESO R for wildlife, that sensor for photos is fantastic, I used the RP for a year and it was amazing, so much detail, the R is better in that regard, plus the 4k crop it has could be advantageous for a longer better reach, get the RF 100-400mm and enjoy, the 24-240mm is also a great option, kind of miss it to be honest.
His a7 iii is just better for wildlife tbh, in pretty much every way. Plus the RF100-400 is good but definitely not up to par with his 200-600. A true upgrade to the a7 iii would be the R6ii
@@simonthibodeau7082 he doesn’t have the A7III anymore and it is not an upgrade in every way, the R has more Megapixels and you basically can’t compare the price, size and weight of the RF 100-400mm to the Sony 200-600mm it’s just not on the same category, he keeps mentioning how huge and heavy the 200-600mm is, I’m saying this because he has a solid photography camera for 1080p recording in his living room and hasn’t even bother considering the potential for wildlife with it, I’ve used it, it’s fantastic, I’ve used the A7SIII too, I had it for a year and I kept wanting more megapixels, that’s where I missed my 26MP Canon RP and the 30MP EOS R.
@@AndyLSB sorry I meant the a7s iii, not the a7 iii. I mean all he does is video, so the mp is irrelevant for him. I'm not debating which is better in general, just that for wildlife video there's no question that his current setup is just much much better, that's why he doesn't bother with the R
@@simonthibodeau7082 I get your point and I’m not disagreeing with you, but he has multiple systems regardless if they’re inferior to the Sony setup, just because, so why not put it to the test ? Why waist a good photography camera for 1080p video for CZcams ? That’s my point, maybe he is surprised by the results, heck, I was when I had them, and he does have a photography account too, on IG, it’s pretty good.
@@AndyLSB Yeah, I guess for review purposes there'd be no harm. The RF100-400 is a fantastic lens, I love it with my R7 for both photo and video. I'm sure it pairs pretty well with the R! Guess he's just spoiled by 4k60 and HD120 and maybe HD60 is just not that worth it for him.
I really wanna see him try the R6ii though, animal eye AF would be game changing for him I feel! Pretty much all of the current RF telephotos are great for wildlife video.
What's is IG? I didn't know he had one!
I have a nightmare grading Clog3. Just when I think I've found the right settings, my next video looks like garbage with the same settings. It seems exposure, lighting, white balance seem to affect it in huge ways which mean spending hours fiddling with colour curves. The LUTs are total garbage. I'm actually considering just not using CLOG3 at all, and use HDR instead.
Same thing with iPhone vs. Android. I think the Pixel 7 is trying to do something with skin softening to compete (see Gerald Undone review of the Sony ZV-1F).
How are you converting slog3? I feel like you're comparing apples to oranges. If you're comparing straight out of camera shouldn't you be on s.cinetone?
I have to admit the Canon makes it easier to look at your face. 😀
Cowboy Smoker! HAH. Love that shit.
Canon have always had remarkable entry level models. Most cameras are still entry level with kit lenses, and lenses per body is lower than 1.8. This is the only reason Sony is not a monopoly. Canon started slr video early, when sony and panasonic were still focusing on camcorders. Nikon could have been a contender, but they released multiple upgrades that offered nearly no improvements in the most important market segment, the 3000 and 5000 series. Nikon users switched because or inferior features compared to the competition. Fujifilm users will switch because or high cost compared to the competition. Panasonic will survive, but they are a niche really, in the general market it does not have a chance against full frame. Fujifilm, Nikon and Panasonic still have no serious proposition for a digital cinema camera, another niche that is not very important. Sony and Canon have a very complete professional video line.
"Remarkable" in what sense? Canon's entry level bodies were indeed OK or even sometimes pretty good, but their "consumer" lenses sucked big time. And they still do. And then there's a gap the size of the Grand Canyon between the "entry level" and the shiny happy world of the "real Canon" - all those R5s, R3s, 70-200/2.8 and 50 1.2.
@@alexandervapnyar1030 They are amazing value and very good quality. Consumers that drive the market do not need more. The kit lenses are OK for 1080p video and 1080p still delivery in phones, which is the typical delivery today, and most people do not buy extras lenses, just one or two kit zooms. Professionals that use a single camera probably go to Canon C70 and higher or Sony FX. The cost difference from cheaper models is not important compared to the cost of lenses. Those who need 4 or 5 cameras go for mid range models. In 2021 Canon M50 I and II, Sony A6400, Fujifilm X-A5 etc is what people actually bought in large numbers in Japan and other countries.
Is the Canon R1 going to be the perfect camera?
Please make a Canon Cripple Hammer compilation. I would click like.
EOS R is an ancient camera. So last season! You need an R5 or R3 for a man of your celebrity good looks! Possibly a R6 Mk II if you must. They all have a few cripple hammers in these too but all new generation them.
I feel (not backed by any math based measurements) that Sony XAVC codec cheating a bit with slight sharpening at "medium spatial frequency" levels of detail, even if profile detail setings -7, so maybe it it worth to try external recorder to avoid any posseble "Sony compression secret souce".
I love the EOS R adopting a Canon EF 4 - 16-35 Zoom. It is not soft and the crop is not an issue. I have over 100 CZcams videos with this setup sitting at my desk all in 4K.. I don't understand why you would by a 24mm lens to record videos for CZcams in your house. It doesn't make sense. You are sabotaging yourself.
In terms of sales, Canon dominates the competition. Canon used to dominate the fast glass market, but new competitors have emerged. For as long as there have been DSLR cameras, Canon has been able to charge exorbitant prices for their goods because they are the only company in the world that possesses super-fast glass with focusing capabilities. Due to their monopoly on fast glass, Canon was able to charge exorbitant prices for almost all of their products in the past. When Nikon finally launches their fast 85mm 1.2 and 35mm 1.2 lenses, it will certainly end Canon's dominion as the king of fast lenses, but sadly, many Canon consumers are unaware that Sony and Nikon offer better lenses with greater build quality.
No, no no. Kasey, I need you to get a BM Pocket 4K, so you can convince me to buy it or not. The Canon is easy mode. I want to see you in the cinema with the Pocket 4K.
I think I'm a reptilian and no one told me... In these side by sides, I liked sony colors more. Does anyone know how to get back to the mothership?
Go for black and white.
Cowboy lut 👌
Canon VIXIA rules, all else Drools!
Yes..lunchbreak..thanks..My girl says hard in bed is better..but don't know what she means..?!
Don’t the higher end rf cameras outclass Sony in terms of specs?
Zeiss 3d pop is more like cutboard/green screen look. I prefer Canon as it has more natural transition
Interesting. I have the quite opposite feeling. I only own Zeiss EF and Canon EF L primes though, which latter are somewhat outdated designs by now. Some say that the RF primes are close to and some exceeding Zeiss primes in sharpness and look. I just don't want to buy native RF lenses because those can't be adapted to any other system. I also don't care about AF as I'm usually not in a hurry.
Canon fucked up colors in the R6 and R7. I hope they fixed skin tones on the R6 II