Everything Wrong With Harry Potter & The Chamber Of Secrets
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 09. 2013
- Well after many months of making you wait, we finally return to the Harry Potter series for the second installment, running down the list of sins in Harry Potter & The Chamber Of Secrets. Yes, there were many. Yes, it was more than we expected. No, we aren't doing Prisoner Of Azkhaban next week.
Go back and relive the sins of the first film, Harry Potter & The Sorcerer's (Philosopher's) Stone: • Everything Wrong With ...
Tomorrow: A new Conversation video.
Thursday: Another sins video--very much requested of late.
Remember, no movie is without sin. Which movie's sins would you like to see recounted next? Merch: teespring.com/stores/cinemasi... - Krátké a kreslené filmy
Imagine if when voldemort says " Harry Potter. The boy lived, come to die" and I then the magic car comes out and runs down Voldemort.
19 years later
" Ford Anglina Potter, you were named after the bravest car I ever knew"
Aimee Weasley that comment is the best I have come across ages. Made my day😂😂😂
Aimee Weasley oh my god. I would have died laughing.
hahaha
Best thing I've read in years 😂😂
that would actually work.... voldemort cant kill the car and his defenses are for living things presumably
Missed sin: The Weasley clock has dentist on it but in Half Blood Prince several wizards show they don't know what dentists are
but the Weasley family is a family of "muggle-loving traitors'
@@gabriellel1118 In Order of the Phoenix, Ron shows he doesn't understand what doctors are. At best you could say that Arthur included the dentist and the others just humour him.
@@jamescallanan2443 oh yeah, that does make the most sense out of anything you could come up with
@Kefou Kefak yea, which is why I said the other guy's explanation made the most probably sense out of all the theories possible
I love your observation but he doesn't care about the books.
Imagine watching netflix with this dude
Good point there Bro
This Dude won't shut up if u watch Netflix with him
Harrry Potter isn't about the movie, it's about the magic and power of the story being told in the hearts of the public. Diversity, right, wrong, respect, love and friendships.
@@Rainydaz3 Diversity?
Turnip Yes. There were those things in the books
Luke Mills wait weren’t theses movies made before 2010 tho? No hate, just a sincere question.
You forgot when Mister Weasley asked the boys when they got home if the car was working instead of getting angry : "Mom is mad but Dad thinks it's cool" cliché
haha that is right!
I would say that Harry Potter played it a little better than to call it cliche, plus its shown in the books, its the character itself whose like that..
McGonagall's spell turned a bird into a goblet so why can't they use the same spell on voldemort and turn him into a harmless dinner plate or something
XD
Sergeant Johnson because of his horcuxes
Tanvi Mishra but the horcuxes prevent voldemort from dying but they don't prevent him for changing shape because he would still be alive
Alexandra Lee true, but even if u smashed the goblet. He would be alivr
Tanvi Mishra they don't need to smash the goblet,if voldemort would be turned into a goblet he could't do anything.just standing around and...do nothing...
I love how you sin the fact that they teach useless spells as if school in real life doesn’t teach you useless facts
Some stuff school teaches is actually useful
Also in Harry Potter if a spell was useless why would they invent it
Owen Mitchell anime is useless why was that invented
Ben Thatcher it’s a form of entertainment dummy
@@owenmitchell1469 yes, like mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell
1:00 - let's be honest, did you know what your friend's parents did for work?
Nope
I'm not even sure what my parents do for work.
Yes. I did.
I still have no idea
Nope
The worst sin in this movie is that when Harry and Ron find out everything important about the chamber/basilisk, when they could create an avenger level wizard team up of Hogwarts teachers, they dont. Instead they kidnap the most useless person they could find, and he attacks them for it
It would would have been better to have at least told a number of the key ones in the series, but, because of who was waiting, possibly not Snape, to at least get them to lend you something if not come with. And even at that, they could have gotten more of the students involved. Jeremy and the page noted they could have just brought a rooster.
they tried to tell dumbledore but mcgonogall stopped them as he was no longer in office but on his way to the ministry or something. Nobody else would believe him. And this way the get to paint Harry as a hero yet again.
@@tasmayshah5539 you’re thinking of the first film.
Also, did none of the teachers ever try to find out what the creature is or talk to moaning Myrtle?
@@DarthViperious unionized cinema sins. For when sins slip thru the cracks
Maybe Ron couldn’t turn his rat into a cup because it was actually peter
Wait what would have happened if pettigrew turned into a cup🧐
@@nicolemay4964 in the first train ride on Hogwarts ron tries to turn his rat yellow
I'm quite certain that's a school rat, not a students "pet"
Yooo imagine peter hiding as a rat and one day transforms into a half rat half goblet and then panicking and turning into a human
Jackson Sainsbury That would be quite funny actually ahha
Moral of the story: NEVER go into the Chamber of Secrets rooster-less.
No wonder Hermione brought Ron with her in the final book. He was a chicken!
ginny killed the roosters
Cocks out for Harry-bae
What a useful lesson.
Ginny kills Hagrid’s roosters and uses their blood to paint the bloody messages on the walls so there isn’t any roosters on school grounds
"only 6, including a dwarf"
that's dwarfist
Aderinsola Ogunlabi ding
And this asshole filch
@@mamudere67 That's squibist
@@ziqinchen2629 Who cares about a fooking Squib
@Bro That’s racist [Ding]
I've always thought Dumbledore hired Lockhart to publicly expose him.
Yeah, it's explained in Pottermore.
Well then Dumbledore doesn’t care about his students education
@@jaimelannister1797Dumbledore's reasoning was something along the lines of "Bad teachers can still give you a lesson: They teach you not to be like them." But yeah it's debatable whether that's worth enough to sacrifice a whole year of education over.
@@jaimelannister1797 yeah dumbledore is stupid
@@jaimelannister1797 He's portrayed as a genius but really Dumbledore is the senile old idiot he supposedly only pretends to be. "Oh I'll risk this guy wiping the memories of my students and teachers just to expose him as the fraud he is." Then there's the excuse he uses to keep Snape around which is supposedly to teach the kids that some teachers are just horrible. Nah Dumbledore. It's because you need him as your inside man in the Death Eaters.
Also, even most youtubers don't answer comments on their videos and yet lockheart is answering ALL of his fanmail
That's because youtubers actually have stuff to do
Chara Dreemurr You somehow have 2 subscribers. Why? UNDERTAIL! (To clear the shitstorm, I genuinely like undertale but MOST of the community is shit)
Chara Dreemurr Did the book say that?
Lockheart is the guy who tries to pass an oral exam by taking all his knowledge from Wikipedia. he has time to answer his fan mail.
yup
One thing that was wrong that they didn't point out in this is that on the Weasley's clock, one of the labels around the edges was "dentist" (it was right before the label "home") however in the 6th movie, Hermione tells a room full of wizard's at Professor Slughorn's party that her parents are dentists, and then she has to further explain exactly what dentists are and do, meaning there are no dentists in the wizarding world. So what's that label doing on the clock of a pure-blood, all-their-life wizard family?
I like to imagine that was Arthur's doing. "It appears that there's one spot missing on our board, dear. There's this muggle place that I have heard of known as 'the dentist'. I haven't a bloody clue what that could be, but it seems like the perfect thing to put there" and possibly secretly watching it, because if one of his children's faces happen to land on this one he has full reason to question them about it thoroughly.
Silentgrace11 That is genius. I will never be able to unthink that everytime I watch Chamber of Secrets haha :P
FearlessStar1000 Haha well I'm glad to be of service x3
Remember its Arthur's job to investigate/learn things about muggles so he probably found out what it is and put it on there.
FearlessStar1000 not everyone is good at teeth spells
"How does she know which student it was?" Well, Ginny was in her house, and had numerous classes with her, so she probably noticed Ginny was gone, and figured that was who it was.
Nice catch!!! Now would you like to disprove the other 82 sins??
@@vinodhcashout6711 Thank you, but no lol
@@vinodhcashout6711 I can't do them all, but here's what I have lol
2. Dobby brought the letters AS PART OF his attempt to get Harry not to go back to Hogwarts. He literally explains this.
4. Um, simply, yes. It was completely possible for Harry to hear it. All you need is for him to be a light sleeper.
5. Just senseless. Sinning someone for saying people's names in surprise is dumb.
13, 14, 15. It could be argued that there's a distracter spell on things like this to prevent Muggles from noticing. They notice Harry and Ron crash because the barrier went up so they never passed through the potential distracter spell.
16. Well, yeah, if magic were real, maybe it could. How would you know? Magic isn't real, so we can't determine how it would or would not malfunction, can we?
19. They weren't that much later, actually. Everyone's at the feast, and that's literally where they go directly from the train as soon as it stops.
21. The camera angle you're referring to hardly even displays the ceiling at all. The panel on the far right is above the top of the viewpoint so it's impossible to tell whether it's open or not. As for the left panel with the beanstalk, we can see the SAME beanstalk in the next shot again, and it goes up behind one of the slats holding up the roof, which blocks the second panel from view, so it technically COULD be open, just not visible.
25. Probably because he thought students would be easy to fool into thinking he was legit? Most other career choices would land you around many more adults than those at Hogwarts, and unless you bounced quickly from job to job, such people would unmask you pretty quickly.
31. She's just doing it for the theory. I didn't see you sinning the kids learning how to make feathers float in the first film.
32. Filch is a Squib. You clearly outlined this with the three panel shot earlier. Attacking Mrs. Norris clearly would be meant as a punishment to Filch (it's just an accident of course, but that's still the way her attack should have been perceived).
34. The wand chooses the wizard. It's extremely difficult to just find a spare wand laying around that'll decide, yeah sure, why not let this random stranger who just found me in a broom cupboard become my new master.
39. If Snape was the one who could have stopped the snake from attacking Justin, then why didn't he stop the snake AS it was about to attack Justin? Why'd he wait until Harry startled everyone with Parsletongue first?
43. Seeing as all three glasses contain identical amounts, it could be easily figured that Hermione only needed to measure by pouring a certain number of ladles into each one, like four or five. Maybe the ladle itself is the measurer.
49. See above comment
50. The Defense Against the Dark Arts job is pretty jinxed, isn't it? Lockhart's probably the only one who WANTED to take the job. Dumbledore might have had no choice.
53. He literally explains seconds later that he's taking power from Ginny, and that's why he's more solid. He wants to talk to Harry and find out why he survived the initial attack, and that's why he's waiting.
66. While this does make sense, if you give it some thought you realize that it's probably not possible to teach all the students the same techniques since Hogwarts contains wizards who are as young as eleven years old and just beginning. It's logical that they'd have to start with the basics. When there's a creature or killer going around attacking people, you can't just immediately teach kids the most advanced things to deal with a monster. Plus, they don't know it's a monster, some still suspect a person.
72. What is the sin here exactly? It doesn't address anything except the next part of the plot. There's nothing wrong with it.
79, 80. These are the same sin, just explained in more detail and then re-sinned. It should still just be one.
82. You couldn't figure out that they were just trying to get Lockhart out of their hair for the time being?
I'd assume that McGonagall went straight to the staff room and ordered an evacuation after seeing the message saying "she" had been taken. There's no feasible way for her to know it was Ginny unless she did a head count before she ordered the evacuation (which she didn't) or if she went into the Chamber herself (which she couldn't)
@@Bro-cx2jc he's just padding the sin coun with 79 and 80.
come on, he can't sin the actor that played dumbledor for dying.
I kinda took that sarcastic "I hope.." as he wished it didn't happened tbh
I think it’s more how the different actor portrayed Dumbledore so differently.
@@nevermore7285 Agreed. The original Dumbledore seemed more mysterious and Merlin-like to me. The new Dumbledore seems to have more of a powerful sense to him.
Agreed. He should not.
Yes he can and that's what makes this channel great
I love the casual note saying "The Books Do Not Matter"
True
same lol
in film they don't, a film needs to stand on its own merits because a large portion will not have read the books.
Only movies that come to mind that have stood on their own without the books are The Lord of the Rings
M. Fi
"make sure to speak very clearly!"
harry: dida;gnd alhgeuoay
How Harry would've said it in philosopher's stone:
Daicjiaijdjiigon airudjjsjxhjloalpey
Raven889 im cryinf
200 like!!
Raven889 in the book he actually gets ash caught in his throat.
Diagonally
"Hogwarts is no longer safe". Oh, just like it was right from the start?
facts
LATER, THE INTRODUCTION OF AURORS CREATES A MASSIVE HUGE SUPER-BIG HYPER-PLOT-HOLE!!
There is totally a profession specialized in this. There are literally Armys that you can call when you have a Basilisk Problem or any Problem with Dark Magic at all.
WOW!
The same thing I was thinking when Sirius said that in “Goblet of Fire”
Least a basilisk wasn’t released just a psycho teacher and a TROLL IN THE DUNGEON
wait wait wait... if the restricted section of the library was really locked and restricted... would voldemort learn about the horcruxes at all? like how is that smart
I luv how it says "The Books Do Not Matter" so true to the creators of the movie
The Percy Jackson movies: Im about to end this whole mans career
@@ananyavallurupalli673 movies? There are no movies, Idk about movies all I know it's that we have a Disney+ series
@Leviathan lol I think he's joking
@@burhanuddinmaskawala187 I heard that too.
@@ananyavallurupalli673Imagine if Peter Jackson directed the Percy Jackson films?
I am Lord Voldemort
*And You’re Watching Disney Channel*
omg hi master its wormtail :D
Bruhhh
Huh
*does that mickey mouse thing in the air with his wand*
Best comment ever
You missed one: When they're flying in the car, "Oh, the invisibility booster is broken, let's dip below the clouds to lose that cover and MAKE SURE we're seen!"
The biggest plot hole is that in 50 years nobody asked Myrtle how she died. They were looking for the chamber and have a victim available for questioning. Also, she's a ghost and can fly through walls, yet in 50 years not once did she think: "hmm, I wonder why I died, let's hover through this floor/wall and check it out". Also, the basilisk uses pipes to move around the school, but the only way into those pipes big enough for that beast is the entrance itself. Then it still had to exit and enter again there and myrtle would have seen it open a bunch of times. She lives there xD
I thought about that too. The only possibile handwave would be to give Myrtle a valid reason to stay quiet about the matter, but I can't think of any
Dumbledore hired Lockhart because no one else would take the job, because of the curse Voldemort placed on the job after he didn't get it years earlier
So it is like the Percy Jackson oracle thing? I call rip-off
+Mihir Beeharry The Harry Potter books were out way before Percy Jackson.
+Mihir Beeharry you do realize that Percy Jackson copied Harry Potter
+Mihir Beeharry well Harry Potter came out before percy jackson so I call rip off 🙂
Conner Tobey That is what I meant .-., the percy jackson ripped it off HP
I just realized something sin-worthy, at 0:52 the Weasley clock CLEARLY shows there's a dentist option, BUT, in the Half-Blood Prince we hear Slughorn and all the other magical people ask Hermione what dentists are and what they do. So what I'm trying to say is that THERE IS A MASSIVE PLOT HOLE IN HARRY POTTER
Sean Wei holy f*ckin sh*t
You deserve a lot more attention for saying this.
You had the same question as this guy: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/60829/why-does-the-weasleys-clock-have-a-dentist-setting
Well shit
In the movie yeah... but not in the books
I dont know if it was only shown in the extended version, but there is a scene where Hagrid is getting rid of dead roosters, because Ginny killed them. So thats why they went roosterless: all roosters were dead.
the videa was showing the extended version
"Why is Hermione the only alert, responsible person in the whole school?"
I asked the same about myself in high school.
Check the post recently?
How the fuck do you know a teacher job at Hogwarts is low payed? Ding
But over here at Ilvermorny School of Witchcraft and Wizardry we have a high payed since we have casinos on the land.
adam erixon Teacher jobs in general are low paying
u know because of the thing in half blood prince
I think he just assumed it was an American school. IDK, maybe teachers in the UK get shit pay or something?
Hogwarts is a premium school though, almost like a university.
you should've added a sin like: "Oh, look, there's a twelve-year-old driving a car."
when ron was drving the magic car
well, yeah, but later, when they missed the train
+DBZCOURT Well, Fred and George were fourteen back then, so it doesn't really change anything (when it comes to that specific scene).
+DBZCOURT ah! to young to be driving under muggle law!
*****
come to think of it i've just remembered that the wizarding world has no cars, the only reason rons dad has one is because of his connection with muggles due to his role in the ministry of magic, and since the wizarding world has no cars they have no car laws which means anyone can drive a car in the wizarding world.
6:53 I think a teacher would probably notice if a student doesn’t attend any classes nor show up at meals and assume that there are missing. Just my opinion.
I also love how harry exponentially becomes more and more paranoid on each movie, becoming a sort of conspiracy theorist
There are fan theories about Harry being in St Mungos after the trauma of his parents's deaths. That all of it is just a lunatic fantasy. Some debunk this but whose to say what a rating mind imagines? And it gets more complex as he tries to hold it together.
3:27 Wait, i just realised WormTail was a goblet at one point
Human transfiguration is actually very difficult so I’m relatively impressed.
Explain!?
Unlimited Stone9 I think they mean 4:27
Crazed oh ok, that's false anyways
Otaku Obsession wormtail is an animagus, he's not using transfiguration
to be fair, j.k. rowling has said that dumbledore hired lockhart because he thought it would be funny
Because a good laugh is more important than the education of hundreds of young wizards... Imagine being a 5th or 7th year and needing to take your OWL's or NEWT's with that kind of teacher.
camaka that makes sense
Classic Dumbledore
camaka Actually it was because Dumbledore suspected Lockhart to be a con artist but with no proof to back it up, and that putting him in a school environment would lead him being exposed. Not caring about student welfare the whole way.
That's actually worse
Imagine Harry facing the Basilisk, grabbing the wizard hat and pulling out a rooster instead of the Sword.
Lockhart accepted the job (Dumbledore wanted to expose him for fraud) because he's like "me, Gilderoy Lockhart, the Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher, teaching the famous Harry Potter. Yes. He learned all of his skills from me."
I think there would’ve been a better way to expose a man for fraud than have him as a teacher when you know he’s subpar, like as a headmaster at a school that’s kind of a dick move
question, how...the...fuck does Ginny get enough blood to write all that stuff on the walls
+knbISlife testuya she killed all of Hagrid's roosters
+seichiro772 then how has the blood not dried.....
+knbISlife testuya It was paint. I just read the book again, she killed the roosters by strangling them. Didn't use any blood.
+A Dark Shade of Green I'm sure she just thought it was paint. And at 11 years old you'd probably make that mistake...
She finally became a woman during this movie.
I died laughing when he said "Nope, No one Could have stopped the snake from attacking Justin, nope No one" *Shows pictures of Severus Snape* 😂
Snape, Snape, Severus Snape.
@@devinandcarrietotaldrama505 DUMBLEDORE
@@nicolefrances8744 Snape, Snape, Severus Snape, Ron, Ron, Ron Weasley
Harry pottaH hArrY poTtah 😂
@@kohaneluvvvv Hermione, Hermione
don’t forget that there is a moment in the dueling club scene where you can see the camera man 🤦🏼♀️
Really? What time mark in the movie is that?
6:39 I need to unsin and resin this sin.
Tom has killed all roosters within vicinity of the school, so there is no “roosters” here, but again and again, if there is a spell that transform animals into water goblets and creates snakes, why isn’t there a spell that makes roosters?
If there is such a spell, these kids aren't gonna know it.
You're asking why 2 year students who just learned about transfiguring animate objects into inanimate objects wouldn't do the opposite ? Really ?
@@theonewayroad3867 They only learned to turn animals into goblets. And bringing life into an object that was never alive before, has got to be a whole 'nother ball park. Transfiguration is harder than it looks.
@@ethanpetersen810 I keep forgetting than sarcasm doesn't translate well in text form. Next time I'll just write it.
@@theonewayroad3867 Lol
My reaction to the video
"Yeah but.... magic"
Dillon 812 no yeah.. but the books
iamasquid 5 throughout the entire video there was a text that said “the books do not matter” because you shouldn’t assume someone has seen the source material when the adapted version
Ultracombo I know exactly that’s why I said it to be funny
those kind of jokes don't work well with text
Ultracombo can’t you take a joke
Hemione: Mandrague or Mandragora-
CinemaSins: *_NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRD_*
Now imagine if lucius had a glock and instead of taking 5 hours to say the death spell, he just popped a cap in Harry's head
I wheezed-
Sounds about American
@@idk-uv7mt Yep, and the Malfoys are British so they wouldn't think of that.
Isn't there an edit of Philosopher's Stone but all the wands are guns?
Sin must be removed. They can't have an extra wand for Ron because witches and wizards can only PROPERLY use wands that decide they want to be used by said witch or wizard (example: draco can use his mom's wand but it's harder to use and doesn't feel right. Also, the elder wand just straight up starts breaking for voldemort because it doesn't belong to him).
But he can't properly use the one he does have, and it IS broken.
Not to mention Neville suddenly turned much more competent once his father's wand got broken and he got his own.
@@moriseyusa Yeah but why would I replace one broken wand with another. Either way it's not gonna work too well
Harry pickpocketed someone else's wand and used it in one of the films if I remember correctly, so that's null and void.
@@titanictnt7476 No, the wands might or might not work. It's not a unanimous yes or no. Sometimes they work but not very well, sometimes they go all Elder Wand like it did to Voldy, etc.
2:47- I think the bigger sin in this scene is that they have earmuffs on to protect them from the Mandrake's cries, but after Neville faints Professor Sprout says "Longbottom's been neglecting his earmuffs" without raising her voice in the slightest, yet Seamus is able to hear her and answer.... Shouldn't he also be able to hear the Mandrake's cries and also have fainted? Are the earmuffs only designed to block out the Mandrakes but allow human voices to still be heard?
Magically modified earmuffs I guess?
I thought a mandrake's wails killed you, not made you faint? I guess J.K is making shit up again.
Apparently if they're young enough it only knocks you out, not kill you.
***** Yeah, that's what it says in the book. Young Mandrakes' screams won't kill you, as they aren't very developed.
Yeah... Someone mentioned that in the above comments. It's cool.
I always assumed that the Slytherin house is portrayed so negatively is because the movie is from Harry's perspective, and Harry would have biases against Slyterin considering he has met Malfoy, Ron and Voldemort
Fraser Souris J.K. Rowling has said she hates slytherin herself like really hates slytherin because she made them to be portrayed as villains and menaces. Although she doesn't hate them in a way of regretting making them just that she doesn't like them because they are supposed to be portrayed as minor villains.
I think Slytherin is portrayed negatively because mostly all dark wizards were in Slytherin.
Dynamo HD But that is in appearance and prejudice
The series is supposed to be about choice, the whole "we choose to be monster" thing. Harry even tells his kid "he was named after a Slytherin" suggesting Harry has grown past his biases, and talks with Dumbeldore told Harry that he and Riddle were in equal positions, yet Harry chose to help people instead of gaining power (which he still could have) while Riddle did the opposite)
Fraser Souris I know not all slyithern are bad like me ummm alright mabu that was not the best example but you get my point
Ron isn't slytherin
6:57 they probably did some sort of roll call and everyone was there except Ginny
1:26 If I remember right, the book says some of the powder flew into Harry's face and caused him to mispronounce the name. Why they didn't do that for the movie is beyond me.
Even the frickin video game did it correctly too, but nope, it's cooler if we have Harry say "diagonally" and LITERALLY end up one fireplace diagonal to the one he's trying to get to XD
because they did not care to do the movie right, to consult the book when in doubt. somehow Chamber of Secrets is still very good compared to the Goblet of Fire or Half-Blood Prince where they completely f*** it up
But the old Dumbledore DIED. He can't help it.
R.I.P Richard Harris
Demon Rantz R.I.P Real Dumbledore.
We know, Jeremy was just being a prick.
+Liam Powell lot of that going around
i liike turtle
2 more sins
1: Myrtle makes a splash when she enters the toilet she's a GHOST
2: Of course pick the 2nd year who has a broken wand so he humiliate himself in front of the whole class
if myrtle wears glasses, how come she didn't just get petrified by the monster instead of getting killed? idk if that's how it works but it only makes sense
Justin though? He saw it through Nick
YES THATS THE POIMT
Missed One: It is shown that people can only die when seeing the serpent directly but how does Myrtel die whilst wearing glasses?
That's... a good question.
Well, she said she was in the bathroom crying because Olive Hornby was teasing her about her glasses. Maybe she took them off while crying, to wipe her eyes?
So you're telling me that Harry was completely safe all the time?
@@timoheinz2879 It's certainly possible.
@@timoheinz2879 He probably would've been paralysed like Hermonie
........ 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐧𝐨 𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐤 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐧𝐨𝐰??? 𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐠𝐨𝐨𝐝 𝐩𝐨𝐢𝐧𝐭
The way he said "Goobye Dumbledore, hope you don't sound or look different."
Kinda messed up
Biggest sin:
The basilisk should be dead. That thing hadn't being fed probably since Tom Riddle graduated from Hogwarts. Obviously it won't manage to survive till the 90's. Even in the wizard world you can die of hunger
Tom Riddle left Hogwarts in the 1945, it was there 1945-1993, that's forty years However, it was owned by Salazar Slytherin Who put it into a thousand year sleep until it was needed again and After Tom riddle left it ate rats.
It was there WAY before Riddle. The legend says that Slytherin left a monster in the chamber. What, is the Basilisk in a family of his own, not a single monster?
When Harry, Ron, and Lockhart fall into the Chamber, there are rat bones all over the ground. Draw the conclusion.
The only way this thing is getting enough food is "magic." Which is fine! But seriously. Snakes eat stuff way bigger than their entire bodies. No way the basilisk found literal TONS of rats down there lol
Tim Chaos I take it you're not familiar with the speed with which rats breed. 2 rats can become 2,000 in a year. and given the age of the castle, yeah it found tons of rats.
The rooster one bothers me a lot, even in the book version. I know Ginny killed all the roosters at school, but how difficult must it be to get a rooster from outside?
I know or at least turn a pet into a rooster!
alex mane Transfiguration is one of the most useful classes of magic that also gets completely shafted most of the story. :P
9Kualalumpur Dude...Ginny is a member of a family that raises chickens, catches garden gnomes, and knows magic. I don't think it's going to be hard for Ginny to catch a rooster.
Mr4theLulz1 Yeah, but Ginny was busy being almost dead at the time, I don't think it would have been a problem.
9Kualalumpur if Malfoy can summon a snake why can't Harry summon a gosh darn chicken
Fun fact: Lucius trying to use the Killing Curse on Harry was actually an improvised moment, never happened in the book.
The actor was just told to use whatever spell came up in his mind to use for the scene, so he went for the Killing Curse (unfortunately conflicting with what the book would later state, that he's actually to spineless to actually kill people.
Presumingly he was mostly just part of the Death Eaters due to his bloodline and wealth.
And cowardice to stand against
4:00
Ah, I see that even fictional magical schools teach useless s**t you'll never need to know during everyday life
For the mandrake thing the one that Proffeser sprout was holding a full grown mandrake and the one that the students where holding baby mandrake
The Lazy Vlogger And Gamer yeah but they only say that in the book, and Cinamasins only judges movies (and songs)
Plush Video Studios I don't think the first one was full-grown, since it wouldn't make sense to plant one Mandrake before the others. Plus, if that one was full-grown, they would've unpetrified one person at least
Maisy Williams That and I'm pretty sure a full grown mandrake's scream is supposed to be able to kill you without ear protection that seems a bit risky
magic.... potions.... herbology.... always show the final example before expecting people to deal with a subject so they have an idea of where your going with something
Was this an extended cut or something? I never remember seeing Filch’s Kwikspell letter, or the questions Lockhart gave out 🤔
Yes. The first two movies got extended editions.
@@Killer4fun damn. Guess I have to add to my bucket list
Its in the books.
@@mr.halfbloodprince394 lol
YEAH...
So, about the “spare wand” thing- and this isn’t just the books, it’s mentioned in the movies as well- the WAND chooses the WIZARD. Your magic works best when using a wand that chose you
@Gracie Johnson Yeah, he gets a new one. Arthur won a contest at the Ministry where he works and they used it to get Ron a new wand and take a family trip to Egypt to visit Bill
@Gracie Johnson They went to Ollivander’s like normal. It really isn’t explained much in the movies, but we do know about the trip and that he has a new wand. Technically Ron never even went to Ollivander’s his first year, his wand was a hand me down
His wand was Charlie’s, he was already using a wand that didn’t chose him
@@Skyebright1 Which apparently means Charlie's shit out of luck without a wand.
@@steelinghades9655 hm maybe Charlie’s was also a hand-me down?
5:49
Did you notice that the flying car is right there.
Oh wow I didn't notice that though I have watched this like a million times.
I saw that part of the video at 5:49 PM Central Standard Time.
Coincidence, I THINK NOT!
Not till I saw this
Harry Potter and the Rock
Harry Potter and the scary snake
Harry Potter and the escaped murderer
Harry Potter and You know who returns
Harry Potter and Everybody has a haircut
Harry Potter and Dumbledore dies
Harry Potter and the horcruxe hunters 1,2
Basically, all the honest descriptions for the movies/books
Lol
3rd one is actually "Innocent prisoner"
Razor Blade he still killed
@@paperman8583
No, only when needed. Never killed innocent people.
Also, you don't need to write "You know who" in the title. "Voldemort returns" works nicely.
Hedwig is female
THANK YOU
THIS IS WHAT YOU SHOULD LEARN IN SCHOOL. THESE ARE THE USEFUL THINGS
and liek who cares I mean
@@hithere4289 like*
@@rosag2277 not really I only corrected the spelling r/whoosh is used most when a joke is mis understood
And at the end of the day, even with all the mistakes is still better than any other new kids movie😂
6:42: Yes.
Yes, this is a giant, laughably big Plot Hole.
This is really something impressive.
What they meant by every student will be accompanied by a teacher was that the teacher would bring the class to their next class.
Tom Riddle waits a few weeks between victims for several reasons:
1.-Dumbledore is still around the school.
2.-If he makes attacks daily he takes a greater risk of someone seeing him controlling Ginny and the basilisk, (His ressurected form is too weak at this point so he does not want to be discovered.)
3.-He can´t take the risk of controlling Ginny way too often because Ginny would get suspicious of the diary or someone could suspect she is behind the attacks.
4.-He does not know all the students who are muggle borns. Only the ones that Ginny knows:
Colin Creevey because he is in the same classes as her.
Hermione because she is a close friend of her brother.
Justin because he was revealed to be a muggle born after the duel where Harry speaks parseltongue.
Mrs Norris because she was actually going after Filch who everyone suspects is a a squib.
Why does Harry go into the Chamber of Secrets completely rooster-less?
Because something they failed to explain in this movie is that Tom Riddle forced Ginny to kill all of the school's roosters. They do show Hagrid carrying a dead rooster in one scene, but anyone who had not read the book wouldn't make the connection.
I was just quoting the You-Tube video... but you're right, Hagrid does frantically wave that rooster at Dumbledore.
Fair enough. "Rooster-less" is a pretty funny non-word. haha
So is "Cockless", and the connection made thereof . haha
No way, I simply cannot imagine a cockless Harry. haha
What's funny is that in the movie, the actor playing Lucius Malfoy had just started reading the books and when he turned back to yell out a curse, the only spell that came to his mind was the killing curse, and the producers liked that scene so they made Dobby CGI blast Lucius. lol
Harry potter movies: were going to add in something obvious for future preference, but won't care about anything else the author put in.
Book and pottermore: answer everyone's questions.
2:05 - yes, magic is unpredictable and can break out or wear off, it depends on the experience of the caster, and to be honest, Arthur Weasley is not precisely a master of charming objects.
2:49 - they most likely did that out of reflex, once they knew how reliable the earmuffs were, the screams didn't bother anyone.
3:07 - The roof of the great hall have several small windows that are most likely kept open for the owls to come and go (or magicaly open and close by themselves)
3:09 - Neither the movies or the books MENTIONS the payment of a teacher (ok, in the sixth, Slughorn demands a raise), and the position of a teacher in Hogwarts is quite prestigious in their world, so for Lockhart, it boosts his ego.
4:08 - I believe since transfiguration is one of the most complex magics, you need to do it in babysteps, like changing matchsticks into needles so in the end you can transform YOURSELF in a chair like Slughorn did for disguise or sprout wings to fly.
4:30 - the first and second movie alone can already make it VERY explicit how wands are like extensions of a wizard's self, such as the first movie's scene of harry picking his wand, and how Ron looked desperated when his wand split in the second movie, scenes earlier. So to get a new wand, only with the specialist. Just like you need a medical specialist to get a prothetic if you lose a limb.
6:07 - or how a proper cinemasins video would call it, "magic car ex machina". At least in the PC videogame adaptation it just arrived to give us a lift, we had to duel the bigass spider. (took me 3 tries to realize I could walk sideways to avoid the lunge).
6:46 - yea, the movie cut off a scene where Hagrid comes to Dumbledore's office complaining that all his roosters had been killed, considering how we have 2:30 hour-long movies, that 20 seconds scene shouldn't have been cut off. (although its still on the DVD extras)
7:24 - oh come on, he said he was getting stronger, more alive. That includes SOLID!
*****
the same way you enchant a car to fly, stairs to move, portraits to have LIFE AND SENTIENCE, the whole ceiling to show the sky, you know...MAGIC!
MrKlausbaudelaire Actually, if I remember correctly Ron's broken wand wasn't even his in the first place, it was Charlie's (or maybe Bill's) old wand, because the Weasley's couldn't afford to buy him his own. So if the school let him borrow a wand it really wouldn't have been all that different from before. It's also clear in Deathly Hallows that just because a wand isn't yours/didn't choose you doesn't mean you can't use it, like that time Harry broke his wand and then Ron gave him one he got off a snatcher, and it seemed to work just fine for him (however he might have said something about it not "feeling the same" or something, but that didn't stop him from being able to use it.
Srbuckley
Actualy, I believe its easier to use a wand from someone you know such as close friends and family, because you know this person as you know his wand, I mean, they hammered in the 7th book how wads have a strong mind on their own, so maybe thats how they behave.Also, the wand from the snatchers also didn't work very well, the movie even had a brief scene where he tests the wand and..well, it was quite hilarious xD But I believe, in the wizarding world, only wand professinal can handle wand distribution.
MrKlausbaudelaire
'the movie cut off a scene where Hagrid comes to Dumbledore's office complaining that all his roosters had been killed, considering how we have 2:30 hour-long movies, that 20 seconds scene shouldn't have been cut off. '
that would make sense if the world population of roosters happened to live at the school.
' they most likely did that out of reflex, once they knew how reliable the earmuffs were, the screams didn't bother anyone.'
okay.....no if you look at their facial expressions it looks like the earmuffs ar doingshit all
' the position of a teacher in Hogwarts is quite prestigious in their world, so for Lockhart, it boosts his ego.'
I doubt he needs an ego boost
'oh come on, he said he was getting stronger, more alive. That includes SOLID!'
doesn't really answer the sin
4 out of 83
slowpoke slowells
I don't know about the earmuffs, it still looks like reflex. besides, notice they can still hear the teacher's voice, so those earmuffs must be enchanted to filter sounds.
Also, we are talking about Lockhart, there is no such thing as "not needing an ego boost" xD
8:31: Dude... he died! Not much either he or the movie producers could do about that one. How is that a sin?
Exactly what I was thinking
+SirCraigius well they could have casted someone better as a replacement
It would have still been a different person. Would still have looked and sounded different.
+SirCraigius obviously. but this new Dumbledore always annoys me, he doesn't feel like a Dumbledore to me.
+Marianna Anagno "casted someone better"? Michael Gambon is amazing. I don't think there is one person that could beat him in the role. Great actor. And, it's not like they could hire a guy that sounds and looks exactly like the old Dumbledore.
Funfact: House elves are actually quite powerful so I won’t be very surprised if Dobby could easily get out of the Malfoy Manor
He can, and he could easily leave and never come back. It's in their blood to stay though as they are brought up to be servants.
If there were a class for the magic of narcissism then Lockhart definitely would have been the professor of that class 😆
6:40 idk if this happened in the film but in the book Tom riddle made ginny kill all the roosters at Hogwarts
in a deleted scene hagrid goes to dumbledore's office to talk him about his dead chickens.
On the top, it says "the books does not matter" :')
@@pifi3764 Not just the books. There is an actual deleted scene (kept in some movies) which shows Hagrid taking roosters to Dumbledore's office. This means that they couldn't use roosters to kill the basilisk.
Daniel Bickley Gorman yeah it happens in the film
ya and the blood was rooster blood
I think Dumbledore hired Lockhart because he was handsome
***** He seems to like having shitheads for his Defense Against the Dark Arts teachers. Its really no wonder why Snape gets so pissed every time he gets passed up.
Marcel Chagnon I mean, to be fair, with the position cursed it is extremely difficult to find anyone to teach that class. Dumbledore actually explains this to Harry in book 6. Obviously not in the movie, so that's a moot point in the context of CinemaSins, but basically Lockhart was hired only because no one else would take the position at the time.
+Blue Sparx "Books Do Not Matter"
Cody Parks Why don't you read my whole comment? "obviously not in the movie, so that's a moot point in the context of CinemaSins" *I addressed that already.*
I thought he was fucking ugly. Am I the only one?
I know the books don’t matter but in the books Hagrid finds all the chickens dead early on. You can see him hold a dead chicken when he barges into Dumbledors office
Cinemasins: **sins the movie**
Movie: ugh do whatever u want I'm just copying the book anyway
Look at the top of the screen
Okay, to be fair. You talk about the probably entirely useless ability to turn animals into water goblets.
But 90% of stuff I learn in maths in my A2 year is gonna be useless in later life :"D
WHEN AM I GOING TO NEED TO KNOW ADVANCED TRIGONOMETRY.
I doubt you will! I graduated HS in 2011 and I couldn't tell you what trigonometry is if my life depended on it.
Not everybody wants to be an engineer, though.
Nobody ever said anything about it being "all about you". You really need to get off your high horse.
His comment isn't particularly stupid simply because engineering is a vocational subject; not a core (foundational) one. The sort of subject you elect to pick in later years at school. I'd hazard a guess less than 1 in 20 school-leavers ever cared about or used trigonometry ever again in their lives.
Say you wanna be in the FBI. Is the FBI supposed to care when the Declaration of Independence was signed?
„Open the chamber of secrets und unleash the horrors within.“
Literally me everytime i go to the shitter after eating spicy foods.
Rafi 666 I laughed so hard reading this
And I choked on my spicy food after reading this twice
What a mood
i dont care how long ago you commented this, you need to know how much this made me laugh. like i snorted lmao
Thx
I just realized. On the Weasley’s location clock there’s dentist as a location, but in the half blood prince slughorn was asking Hermione all about what a dentist does
4:29 That was a long twelve years for Wormtail.
Dunno what “Parcel Tongue” is. I do know what Parseltongue is, however.
It means you can speak package.
@Rainbow the Dragon Cat :0
Ding!
Sinning Cinema Sins LMFAO
@@ophie71 Check out their video 'everything wrong with cinemasins'
LATER, THE INTRODUCTION OF AURORS CREATES A MASSIVE HUGE SUPER-BIG HYPER-PLOT-HOLE!!
There is totally a profession specialized in this. There are literally Armys that you can call when you have a Basilisk Problem or any Problem with Dark Magic at all.
WOW!
10 sins to CinemaSins for giving a sin to the fact that in the next movie there is a different Dumbledore. I mean...the guy died. I think that deserves waiving the sin.
Vi S I agree.
Cinemasins: Assholes who don't care!
YEH I WAS SOO MAD WHEN I HEARD THAT
True, it's rude to mention it or at least that way.
We can blame the producers for making the new Dumbledore look so much different.
But the sins are not all complains. And they only remove sins when there is something great about a movie. Its not great that someone dies and it would be wierd if they didnt mention it
The thing that annoys me the most about the basilisk is it's just a large serpent. There are these others of it being a large lizard, a snake, but only 12 fingers long, etc. on the serpents thing, but the eldest I know is also called a cocatrice, which, I would have liked more to see the toad egg hatching a cock/serpent hybrid.
In a deleted scene, Hagrid tells Harry that all the roosters have been getting killed (because Riddle made Ginny do it so the basilisk could hunt safely). Also Dumbledore hired Lockhart to show he was a fraud (because Dumbledore is a total savage)
One of the biggest plot from the book and they leave it out of the movie. Smh
Lol, it's so funny how nearly all of the classes in this movie are completely useless. Students r literately getting killed one by one and they r still learning how to pull a weird carrot monster from a pot and how to turn a bird into a goblet.
Except....those "weird carrot monsters" are mandrakes, which they explicitly state are used to make a potion that cures the people who had been petrified by the basilisk.
+Topher1286 lol, I posted this comment just so I can get a hermione explanation of the carrot monster. Thanks man.
+Doctor KoolK You're quite welcome. I can be a bit of a "NEEERRRRRRD" like Hermione. haha
+Topher1286 don't get me wrong, hermione is cool, there's nothing wrong with that.
+Doctor KoolK Nah, no worries, friend. :)
That animal-to-goblet spell would be totally useful;
Harry: I could really use some plain water right now, but all the goblets are broken.
**pigeon flies in**
Harry: (getting out wand) Sorry pigeon, it was you or Hedwig.
Ditto 73 but u also might have to do 4n-1 so yea
Oh shaddap, I'm not in the mood for algebra.
Ditto 73 neither 😁
I am very sorry to ruin the like count of 69, but I must like thus comment. Please forgive me. 🙏
Adriana Is Me dats ok
CinemaSins at 10:13 - "including a dwarf"
CinemaSins literally three parts later when Dolores Umbridge measures Flitwick's height- ThAT's RaCISt
they forgot the one when harry broke his arm and just rolled over on it on all his weight after the match and lockheart was about to come over
I sin you for misspelling Parseltongue....
DAMN!!💖😂
“Parcel tongue” Is that the language of mail?
I can speak parseltongue.
So?
@@jassyanimations8947 criminal
It's pretty likely that Lockheart was hired for the job, because with it's rather ominous reputation as "cursed" only he could be stupid enough to accept the offer. Lockheart got the job because _nobody else wanted it_.
Ze Rubenator Doesn't Snape want the job though?
barbaro267 he does, but Dumbledore clearly doesn't want to give Snape the job (you know, with the whole having been a death eater thing). Someone else also pointed out that Dumbledore wanted to expose Lockheart as a fraud, and he saw the opportunity he had if he hired him.
Also don't forget Voldemort cursed the position back when he wanted the job. So now all of the defense against the dark arts teachers will only last a year.
comment removed by user
nyphix4321 In the movie Percy states that Snape's wanted Quirrel's job for years, suggesting that the "curse" only lasted while Harry was at Hogwarts. Everything bad happens around Harry, he's always a really bad omen.
The reason he went roosterless is because there were no more roosters because Ginny killed them all, the blood on the walls being rooster blood 😳
Using that Homer Simpson bit on Hermione is probably this channels finest moment.
My father will hear about this.
Skitty Unfortunately he's currently in Azkaban, where his "powerful friends" in the Ministry cannot help him and the Dementors suck every last bit of good cheer out of his day.
P.S: Nice Draco reference, though.
YESSSSSSS HE WILLLL
no siriusly [lol] i hate this vid
Yes. Yes he will.
this is why I read the books.
Reading ding
Arnold Rivas its good for the mind and soul. And for knowing what happens in the movies.
Spoop I know it is. I've read the books too. But I long accepted that not everything will be explained, mentioned or make a cameo in the films long ago. But the films are good, very good compared to other YA adaptations, there are other exceptions however.
Arnold Rivas yes I will give the movies that, but still.
Spoop I know. I know. What is the worst YA adaptation you've seen?
OK, but sinning the death of an actor isn’t cool dude.
Yeah,that guy is really rude😡
@efun milum about dumbledore cast change 8:31
also don’t play it for laughs holy sh*t!
@@mr.halfbloodprince394 yeah ikr.. its fucked up he trolled dumbledore death..
Everyone in this comment thread obviously isn't used to Cinema Sins, it's not a really big deal ya f*cking snowflakes
Hagrid did not think the spiders would attack them because he doesn't get attacked by the spiders n assumed (like he often does in the books) that the spiders will treat them like they treat Hagrid once they know they're friends of Hagrid
Umm, Ginny killed all the roosters.
Thank you.
Accio Rooster? no? ok..
That wasn't in the movie
The books don't matter when it comes to cinema sins, he is only judging the movie
Actually, in the movie you see Hagrid holding dead roosters in his hands.
Like...made the species extinct... cause I'm pretty sure an 5 hour round trip to the muggel world for a rooster would be worthwhile... also... why don't the hogwarts teachers ever do the minimal research on these historically insane monsters (Basilics info: 1 page total of info).
Also, why couldn't Lockhart use one of those quills that Rita Skeeter has to answer his mail? He definitely could have afforded it. It would have made answering his fan mail easier.
YellowStarCTC Because he have a huge ego.If he used the quill to answer his fan mails,it won't mean anything to him.All the fan mails are just food for his ego.
YellowStarCTC He would've wanted to use Harry for this task so later he could boast how Harry Potter served him by answering his fan mail.
It wouldn't have that personal touch?
Missed sin: During the duel club scene, there is a brief moment where you can see one of the cameramen in the picture.
8:31 Okay, that was uncalled for, the dude _died_
Agreed
You know how Harry fights the basilisk for literally hours? I really think he could have just used that animal-to-water-goblet spell to turn it into a water goblet, it would be way easier.
Art 4 Suckers I think that it is only plausible with small animals.
How does he fight it for "literally hours"
Alexandru Calciu dammit 😂
Tobias 'Big Mo' Logan it just a thought jeez
Art 4 Suckers ... no way he could have turned something that big into a ‘water goblet or something’.