The musical examples give completely the wrong impression of what his music was like so what was the point on including it. The text was very interesting though.
Your take on CPE Bach is rather odd. Yes, his music was quite popular in it's day. But it's popularity faded over the years, to the point that his major works are rarely performed today. Even his popularity among other musicians of his era was as much him being the son of JSB, as it was his music.
Notice the way he repeats that C.P.E. Bach was Johan Sebastian Bach son 1:22: "...his father Johan Sebastian Bach", 4:07 "his father Johan Sebastian Bach", etc because I stopped watching. This constant unnecessary repeating of statements is typical of AI generated texts, each part created with a different prompt. It always looks like a text written by 20 different people stitched together. But to be fair if is a biography of him is natural to highlight his qualities.
For a while I went OK, OK, there are all kinds of ways of speakig English. "barok? OK. "Rorr power?" Mnuh. But there's a limit. The guy's name is "Bach," not Bakk. Maybe ask a friend. Or listen to a competent CZcams... And "Georg" is pronounced jorje, or george, exactly like the English version of the name, George. Amazing! (In fact the robot does get both "baroque" and "Bach" correct -- from time to time. Damn thing is random.)
Sometimes he speaks BaCH sometimes BaK. Baroque is on British pronunciation, for me it is Ok, Oh the constant repeating of phrases like "his father Johan Sebastian Bach" is typical of AI generated text each part generated with a different prompt. It always seems like a text written by 20 people stitched together: has no unity, no chaining of ideas, a lot of unrelated statements randomly vomited.
@@agranero6 It's not even that AI videos are bad. You just gotta make sure you at least review the video and correct it before releasing it. This video is so unbelievably half assed it's nauseating
@@Seenall AI generated things are the last refugee of lazy people to do low effort videos and make a buck. Do you really think those people will or are even capable of review anything. LLMs are based in predict the next token the semantics is only low level low range, based in Euclidean spaces. Their semantics are not based on an internal model of the world that is based in interaction. So for LLMs truth and falsehood are indistinghishable so the hallucinations. All that is influenced by the cancer that are Chomsky views of language that stated that gramatic comes from genes despite a huge amount of cases that don't fit this view and ignores semantics altogether. Intelligence predates language by millions of years. Equating language to intelligence is a huge mistake. Fortunately the investors in LLM based AI realized that they overpromisse and underdeliver, that they exhausted data to train them (as Mila Muratti admitted) even stealing IP to do that (as Altman admitted). While investors expected exponential growth the only thing they saw were costs to raise exponentially with little quality boost. And yeah, AI generated texts suck, as anyone that can read more complex things things that Millie Moo can immediately recognize it is AI. We all saw through that immediately.
Music composers in Chronological Order (Complete Playlist)
czcams.com/play/PLi1GhOyelpzYV6KKuSXs6u-xHipEO-pn9.html
interesting, but it´s a pity that the background music and images are most of the time completely off topic
Quite.
Why not choose, say, CPE Bach music as background music
@@pinkfloydhomer because its an AI generated video????
@Seenall YES After some seconds I stopped, this kind of video is a scandal!
👎
@@Seenall You can still force your music of choice on it
The musical examples give completely the wrong impression of what his music was like so what was the point on including it. The text was very interesting though.
Wait, is this completely AI created?
Se nota
I'm going to have to dust off my keyboard exercises written by CPE Bach.
Your take on CPE Bach is rather odd. Yes, his music was quite popular in it's day. But it's popularity faded over the years, to the point that his major works are rarely performed today. Even his popularity among other musicians of his era was as much him being the son of JSB, as it was his music.
Notice the way he repeats that C.P.E. Bach was Johan Sebastian Bach son 1:22: "...his father Johan Sebastian Bach", 4:07 "his father Johan Sebastian Bach", etc because I stopped watching. This constant unnecessary repeating of statements is typical of AI generated texts, each part created with a different prompt. It always looks like a text written by 20 different people stitched together.
But to be fair if is a biography of him is natural to highlight his qualities.
For a while I went OK, OK, there are all kinds of ways of speakig English. "barok? OK. "Rorr power?" Mnuh.
But there's a limit. The guy's name is "Bach," not Bakk. Maybe ask a friend. Or listen to a competent CZcams...
And "Georg" is pronounced jorje, or george, exactly like the English version of the name, George. Amazing!
(In fact the robot does get both "baroque" and "Bach" correct -- from time to time. Damn thing is random.)
Use your brain, this is an AI generated video
They use the correct German pronounciation of "Georg."
Sometimes he speaks BaCH sometimes BaK. Baroque is on British pronunciation, for me it is Ok,
Oh the constant repeating of phrases like "his father Johan Sebastian Bach" is typical of AI generated text each part generated with a different prompt. It always seems like a text written by 20 people stitched together: has no unity, no chaining of ideas, a lot of unrelated statements randomly vomited.
@@agranero6 It's not even that AI videos are bad. You just gotta make sure you at least review the video and correct it before releasing it. This video is so unbelievably half assed it's nauseating
@@Seenall AI generated things are the last refugee of lazy people to do low effort videos and make a buck.
Do you really think those people will or are even capable of review anything.
LLMs are based in predict the next token the semantics is only low level low range, based in Euclidean spaces.
Their semantics are not based on an internal model of the world that is based in interaction. So for LLMs truth and falsehood are indistinghishable so the hallucinations.
All that is influenced by the cancer that are Chomsky views of language that stated that gramatic comes from genes despite a huge amount of cases that don't fit this view and ignores semantics altogether.
Intelligence predates language by millions of years.
Equating language to intelligence is a huge mistake.
Fortunately the investors in LLM based AI realized that they overpromisse and underdeliver, that they exhausted data to train them (as Mila Muratti admitted) even stealing IP to do that (as Altman admitted). While investors expected exponential growth the only thing they saw were costs to raise exponentially with little quality boost.
And yeah, AI generated texts suck, as anyone that can read more complex things things that Millie Moo can immediately recognize it is AI. We all saw through that immediately.