Time-lapse Recording of the Archaeological Dig at the Richard III Burial Site

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 8. 03. 2015
  • In the summer of 2013 University of Leicester Archaeological Services returned to the Greyfriars site where they found the remains of Richard III. A second dig at the site was necessary because Leicester City Council were about to start work on the King Richard III Visitor Centre, part of which would cover the archaeological site.
    This is a complete recording of the whole four week dig and includes narration by archaeologist Mathew Morris.
    This film was produced by External Relations, University of Leicester.
    Filmed & Edited by Carl Vivian

Komentáře • 20

  • @annazaman9657
    @annazaman9657 Před rokem +3

    This was so much fun. Love the constant interest by the public on viewing platform through out the entirety of the dig

  • @georgewhitehead8185
    @georgewhitehead8185 Před rokem +5

    In this video, at about (0:08) you will see the first trench, with the little "box like step out" and that is the exact place where Philippa Langley found the skeleton of King Richard III. It was Philippa Langley who was down in that first trench, on the first day, and within the first four hours, when she found the left leg bone, and then the right leg bone of King Richard III. Philippa Langley was the FIRST person with the vision and drive to try and find the king, and because of her efforts the world now has this history shaping event. Without Philippa Langley and her efforts, there would have been NO discovery of King Richard III, or even a need for a King Richard III Visitor Centre. The University of Leicester owes a life long debit of gratitude and recognition to Philippa Langley. Doctor George Whitehead

  • @happycommuter3523
    @happycommuter3523 Před rokem

    This is so fascinating! History right under your feet.

  • @tomisthehebitch
    @tomisthehebitch Před rokem +7

    I’ve literally skateboarded over a dead king. Several times
    🤯

  • @LindaJB2
    @LindaJB2 Před 7 lety +2

    Very fascinating. Thank you for sharing this information.

  • @tdsportscards
    @tdsportscards Před 2 lety +1

    Very intriguing insight on the excavation...it just boggles my mind that over the centuries in England, nobody ever created a royal cemetery to honor the past...yes, I know families were battling over power and land but it's crazy to think they were all buried within the church and not an individual building

  • @questionmark9819
    @questionmark9819 Před rokem

    Thank you to Phillipa Langley for making this happen.

  • @nutmegger1957
    @nutmegger1957 Před 9 lety +3

    P.S.: Who ELSE was buried there, other than Richard III? Did anyone ever find out who the others found, were?

    • @annazaman9657
      @annazaman9657 Před rokem

      The body in the stone coffin was a lady of high status but they weren't able to positively say who she was. They have narrowed it down to one woman but can't prove it is her as she had no descendants

  • @williammatthews4491
    @williammatthews4491 Před rokem

    fascinating.

  • @nutmegger1957
    @nutmegger1957 Před 9 lety +4

    A couple of thoughts strike me as I watch this, and recall this whole reveal occurring at the time: 1. Why was the body of a King so recklessly uncared for in the first place? 2. What role, if any, did the sensitivity to the Royal Family play, in the archeological aspects of this site, given the assumed familial nature of this find, have? In other words........given the bad reputation of this particular King, historical figure or not, was it compelling to unearth and relocate him, due to Royal ties alone? (i.e.: had Hitler's body not been cremated, but unceremoniously buried in what is now a parking area, where the bunker was; would it have been unearthed and reburied with the same sense of urgency or interest?)

    • @terilefevers6189
      @terilefevers6189 Před 6 lety

      nutmegger1957 I have wondered the same thing.

    • @michaeltaylor1864
      @michaeltaylor1864 Před rokem

      @@terilefevers6189 don’t be fooled by the University, they had nothing to do with the find or dig, the person who found the King was Philippa Langley, the University stole this find along with the guy who helped her with the dig, the Uni had previously sacked him, only to rehire him once Philippa found the King, and together, they conned everyone……..they are disgusting.

    • @roberthudson1959
      @roberthudson1959 Před rokem +3

      Remember that Richard was buried by the same people who killed him, so he was lucky to be buried at all. A tomb was eventually built, but it was not open to the public and was destroyed when the friary was dissolved. Finding Richard was such a long shot that HM didn't worry about it. Once his remains were identified, the ruckus started. The issue was actually discussed in Parliament.

    • @lawrence_lg4992
      @lawrence_lg4992 Před rokem

      @@roberthudson1959 thanks for the info, didn't follow the story at the time but am fascinated by this kind of stuff so am looking into it now

    • @annazaman9657
      @annazaman9657 Před rokem +1

      He was buried in a hurry and probably in secret. That's why no one knew where his grave was and Thus all the subsequent myths of him being thrown in the river etc

  • @OregonCrow
    @OregonCrow Před rokem

    Who is king richard the III?

  • @ronniefalcao8921
    @ronniefalcao8921 Před 10 měsíci

    It is intellectually dishonest that every presentation from the University of Leicester on the subject of finding Richard III does not start with an acknowledgment that this would never have happened without the driving force of Philippa Langley and the Richard III Society. I understand that the University wishes to burnish its reputation at every opportunity. I think you do not realize that this glaring omission tremendously reduces the reputation of the University. Shame!