Video není dostupné.
Omlouváme se.
Další v pořadí
Automatické přehrávání
What Went Wrong With Germany's Insane Hover Transport?Mustard
zhlédnutí 7M
The last British VSTOL aircraft | Harrier Jump Jet GR9Imperial War Museums
zhlédnutí 978K
Harrier Jump Jet (BBC documentary 1981)michaeldibb
zhlédnutí 4,8K
Chocolate Screwdriver! 🔩 Always have the right tool for the job! #amauryguichon #chocolateAmaury Guichon
zhlédnutí 46M
Který kostým je váš nejoblíbenější? 😭Natyla
zhlédnutí 128K
Kdo je silnější??? 🔥🔥🔥Aleš Lamka - Fitness
zhlédnutí 181K
VAŠE DÁVKA USPOKOJENÍ #74 😍HouseBox
zhlédnutí 395K
The First Ever VTOL Jet - Ryan X-13 Vertijet | Aircraft History#5Rex's Hangar
zhlédnutí 34K
DeHavilland Mosquito - Why The Luftwaffe Was ScaredMilitary Aviation History
zhlédnutí 106K
Why was the Harrier RetiredMilitary TV
zhlédnutí 95K
Unusual Nazi Aircraft And Other Bold Aviation Concepts. The Dornier Do. 335, Blohm & Voss Bv P.163DroneScapes
zhlédnutí 1,4M
Blackburn Buccaneer - Insane Low Level Bomber Americans couldn't shoot down - (Full Story)Aviation Republic
zhlédnutí 609K
Sidewinder - The Weapon That Changed Air CombatCurious Droid
zhlédnutí 2,5M
Crash Landing and Rebuilding a Harrier JetAARP
zhlédnutí 632K
The Insane Engineering of the ThunderscreechReal Engineering
zhlédnutí 3,7M
Který kostým je váš nejoblíbenější? 😭Natyla
zhlédnutí 128K
Eleftherios Petrounias helped by Arthur Zanetti = epic gala moment ❤️Olympics
zhlédnutí 48M
Jak Mluvit Jako SigmaTaky Bige
zhlédnutí 524K
Survival Skills: Steam Distiller for Dirty Water in Extreme Conditions. #survival #campingSergio Outdoors
zhlédnutí 32M
Replacing a valve on a full water tank! 🫣💦 - 🎥 the_ladyplumberUNILAD
zhlédnutí 135M
Hojení bodné rány nožem při carnivor stravě | Očima vojáka speciálních sil | #mscrewpodcast #podcastMichal Šopor
zhlédnutí 168K
My Bed On Different Days #ShortsLuke Davidson
zhlédnutí 17M
Harley Quinn lost the Joker forever！！！#Harley Quinn #jokerHarley Quinn with the Joker
zhlédnutí 26M
In about 1988 I was at an airshow in El Paso Texas standing in a flying suit beside my aircraft.When the USMC Harrier did it's bow at the end of it's show,a woman turned to me and said "Hell,I bet you wish you had those in yer Air Force".
I replied,"Madam we've had them in the Royal Air Force since 1969"
LOL Texas...
God... Americans....
Where would humanity be without the dimwits?
Sadly the isolationist living and assumption all advanced technology must originate in the US gives rise to this opinion from 'some' folk. I would love to have witnessed her response!
waynester71 Similarly with the B-57. When I was very young I remember may Dad and I would always talk planes. I showed him a model of a Canberra that I wanted and we got on that subject. He just kept trying to convince me that it was a British jet to which I would reply, "No it's not, it's made by Martin!" Oh to be older and understand things now! (I do really like the early Canberras with the fishbowl canopies. They were very elegant.) I also think the Kestral was better looking with the lower canopy, but style doesn't count in warfare!
That USAF Test Pilot is simply brilliant! An amazing piece of tentative stabilisation.
5:21 - My Balzac features an enlarged fuselage too.
LAFF!!!!
@@twasbrillig33 and the slithy toves
did gyre and gimble in the wabe.
@@elhombremo7404 all mimsy were the borogoves and the mome raths outgrabe
Bragger....
I had a flight in a Harrier T4 in 1993 when I was in the cadets. an absolutely amazing plane and an experience I will carry to my grave.
feels really weird coming in to a hover from forward flight and the pilot is balancing us on 2 columns of air like balancing a saucer on a pair of chopsticks.
So envious!
Swine!. (colour me blood vessel bursting envious!).
Awesome aeroplane! ... we have a GR3 Harrier in a NZ museum...also HMS Invincible visited NZ in 1983 there was an an airshow and a Sea Harrier did a bow!...and a friend of mine was Tactical Radar Operator on HMS Invincible during the Falklands War.. He did not know if he was going to live or die!.. Thanks from NZ 👍🇳🇿
As you see at 5:00 Thats the Most Kerbal Design VTOL Jet ive seen.
german quality. so the ospreys are just a clone
@@shellbomberify yes but actually no
Love the Harrier.
All day, every day.
Azureneedle pnmchurchv8vtolitiron897. hi peterselwynpnmbristol AEROPLANE'S holyspiritmonufacture.
I am currently working on a website for the team and I have been working on the project management role at a company and I have been working with my client for over a month year to ensure that they they are working on working with us
And twice on a Sunday!
U dead😢
I used to watch the Kestrel from our house in Sussex as a kid in the 60's, watching is come to a standstill over the field opposite was pretty thrilling although we had no idea just how important it was. And to those here who say ugly useless etc: do you think it would have remained in service for long if it was useless? Thank god for prats, they make the rest of us look that bit more intelligent.
Agree with all you said. Your last sentence brought back many of my memories of the SE Asian conflict (Vietnam): "The USAF made a huge mistake using the same flight path..." Lost some friends in the BUFFS that were directed to do the same, and never came back.
33 persons just noticed that the VTOL fighter aircraft were NOT invented by McDonnell Douglas.
The video stops abruptly! Where can I find the full version?
This is like 11 years old no one knows
czcams.com/video/5KIiE_7jt2c/video.html
I was born in Hucknall ( Nottingham-England) and as a lad, circa 1953 i watched the Flying Bedstead being tested at the Rolls Royce airfield there
One small exception. The United States is part of NATO and there are 13,513 serviceable airports in the United States. In addition the Interstate roads have straight sections designed every couple of hundreds miles. They were designed to function as airstrips. It would be almost impossible to knock out 13,513 airports and the many straight sections of 6.5 million miles of roadway. So the opening statement is sort of true, but not 100% correct. I would say that it is true for Europe and leave it at that.
Wade French and just how many would be available for the use of aircraft capable of influence WW3 if the Cold War had turned hot? Airbases are amongst the first target of any invading power. The Harrier allows you to disperse your aircraft into places where, for example, an F-16 can't go. Dispersal to civilian airfields could do this, but the vast majority won't have the facilities or infrastructure to support military aircraft, plus these locations are known worldwide and would be vunerable to enemy attacks (just look at WW1 the German subs knew which ships had left New York bound for England because the sailings were published as were the insurance details which identified the cargo being carried allowing the Germans to know where to be to intercept these ships). In the Cold War the RAF's V-Bomber fleet would be dispersed to regional airports within the UK to escape Russian attacks, but this made these airports targets, so the Bombers were not going to be much safer than at their home base, the Harrier could go hide in a wood and then pop up to surprise the enemy.
@Dmitri Kozlowsky you are so wrong...The USSR had just lost 1 in 8 people in a major conflict...they had neither the manpower nor the intention to pour anything through the Fulda Gap. Don't rehash old cold war propaganda...
@Dmitri Kozlowsky I wouldn't call those events a full blown invasion of Western Europe...I'm no friend of dictatorial regimes but please stay focused and reasonable. Don't let fear get the best of you...
@Dmitri Kozlowsky I am old enough to remember. Stop patronizing me.
NATO would have gone nuclear if the Soviet turds ever crossed "the line". Drunken Soviet leaders realized this fact, and never tried it.
Hey I was watching that!
Vote up if you made a model harrier as a kid - of any kind (mine was Airfix; given out to all the boys in my class by an RAF recruitment Officer! [a deal with Airfix?] Only 2 of us got round to completing it).
Good vid.
It's late, I'm tired, and I'm watching random videos on CZcams. Maybe now's a good time to engage in a pedantic debate about plane specification...
I've always liked this plane. I like the capabilities.Plus, it has pleasing lines when walking around it. I can't say the same for some much more focused jet fighters.
is a good video. Well done Europe
For all its perceived faults, still an amazing piece of engineering
Wowww....Amazing.
Now i know why GTA Sanandreas used "JUMP JET" as cheat code.
You'd be surprised how many of those details in video games stem from the developers really researching the material and knowing their stuff.
If Rolls-Royce weren't such a bunch of gangsters, Britain would have at least 2 major aviation powerplant manufacturers.
I like this jet engine most; because it's the powerplant of my most favourite Harrier jump jet.
This is my favourite aircraft from childhood. Despite being sentimental for it the aircraft is now obsolete. Despite many attempts to develop the pegasus engine, Rolls Royce never managed to make it capable of supersonic flight. As time went on it has been outclassed in speed and manoeuvrability so is a liability in combat. The F-35 is a good replacement even if it doesn't capture the mind like the harrier. What is bonkers is that we currently have neither aircraft in active duty.
I'm surprised there hasn't been any other tilt jet designs besides the single German example the EWR VJ 101. I bet we will see tilt jet designs in the future when more countries care about being able to take off and land vertically
Oh that voice!! The fella that was in all those anime dubs in the nineties. Champion
It's never been either. As a multi-role aircraft the harrier's strength was always it's flexibility. It's a fighter, it's a bomber, it can take off and land without an airfield. No contemporary aircraft could match that combination. You can however find better fighters, supersonic flight existed before the harrier was even developed. If if wasn't for the tricks you could pull by vectoring thrust in flight it wouldn't have been as good as it was. It's the only plane I know that can fly backwards.
The German Dornier Do 31 VTOL prototype cargo jet used a couple of these engines.
the marines purchased decommissioned RAF Harriers for spare parts, not to fly them. The F-35B is the only active STOVL aircraft currently in use in the US arsenal.
Superb....
Nice flying!
love how the model harrier has a wire attached to the top. i know it was for a remote control but can you imagine telling NATO you have this revolutionary design for a VTOL aircraft and showing them that video
They more than likely did.... That's how nato got sold on the idea...
Hello, good evening thank you for being beautiful thank you for being wonderful I hope you have a great day. The greatness in you is beautiful. Goodnight.
Nice video. Thanks for posting it.
I love the harrier and everything about it
Matt Imgz same
Never heard of the VAC 191B. And I thuoght that the Yak-36 was an origional aircraft. But as can be seen when you look it up, the VAC was 10 years before the Yak.
smart fighter video....fine landing.
The Harrier had a very good and successful life !!!
Brilliant video.
Was at Farnborough air show and saw no less than five hovering less than 100 yards away :-)
Hello
3:06 I am a Brit and I'm sure the guy flying that at 360 is Merican ..he had balls the size of my house RESPECT !
I have some nostalgia for an era when fighter planes (and other aerospace vehicles) did not take two decades to develop.
Great, .most versatile design, ever, where is the rest of the video ???
Great video. Good job.
Tuyệt Vòi lắm
The cool thing is, the US already had people working on flying wing designs, more advanced than the horten brother's designs.
Also, The horten bros designs were all unpowered gliders untill the air force got interested. the US had powered flying wing designs stemming from the mid 1920s :3
Honestly, what I don't get in these arguments is when people say that we "stole" the technology and get butthurt about it. Its called the "spoils of war" for a reason. The Allies defeated Germany, therefore the Allies took the tech. It's harsh, but that's just how war goes.
Mantapp
3:47 "Well, I guess I'm leaving..."
"Aight, imma head out"
5:22 my new favorite plane is the bawlsach
I wouldn't be surprised if the french came up with a wetmoew.
Awesome piloting skills
Generally accepted as the world's first assault rifle,the StG44's effect on post-war arms design was wide-ranging, as evidenced by Mikhail Kalashnikov's AK-47, and later in the.US M16 and its variants.The Soviet Union was quick to adopt the assault rifle concept. The AK-47 used a similar-sized intermediate round and followed the design concept, but was mechanically very different He did copy the gas operating system of the StG44/MP-44, and used it in the design of the AK-47that he can not deny,
What`s the music at the beginning and the end?
I see your point, but what I get annoyed at is when they accuse us of stealing and acting like that's a big crime. I completely understand that the concept of stealth originally came from Germany. A lot of modern war tech was originated from WWII German tech.
muito bom gostei muito
F-35: Im going to end this mans whole career
British ingenuity !
I'm getting more and more sceptic about the F-35,considering it's protracted development,enormous cost overrun,enormous spec revision. It's just doesnt make sense for UK to continue with the program,it would be more feasible to develop the old P1154 by adding stealth capability to the design
Was outraged when a friend told me this after watching a prog on telly. Then I saw the prog and became a believer. Ive seen umpteen discrediting shows since, not ONE answers the questions posed in that show.
To be fair, the Harrier wasn't a compromise plane that had to share a platform with a (reinforced and thus very heavy) carrier-based CATOBAR variant. And the 35B's requirements compromise the other versions as well due to weight reduction for the B. The Joint Strike Fighter is a stupid idea and should have just been the A model to replace the F-16.
Thanks for contributing to the comments, Elliott. Posting spelling corrections is surely worth the effort of reading through a massive argument that occurred in times of yore.
How hardcore are that couple having a picnic right next to a hovering "prototype" vtol aircraft! "O,H and S be dammed!, nothing comes between me and my sammiches!".
a flying wing is naturally more stealthy than a normal plane. the mosquito was stealth cuz it was made of wood and not metal.
The Harrier: a real proven and versatile combat aircraft: legacy of vectored exaust thrusters without complex lifting system as F-35, the disavantage: not supersonic or stealthly but more easy mantein and more simple vstol enginiering.
What about the Lochkeed Hummingbird . One crashed
In Marietta Ga in the early 1960s
Which of the Harrier stories was it that the German ?General cut the throttle too early and crashed the Harrier got out of the plane and announced that was 332? Allied aircraft destroyed. He was also the one who said that they got regular updates on the Canadian Arrow as it was being designed and built.
great video!!
Monster: borh combat aircrafts are supersonic: F-35 and Yak-141, in F-35 enginiering the front fan unit help the vstol performance without using the 100% engine thrust power and in Yak-141 have two separate engines to vstol performance, only Harrier use total engine thrust to lift and propulsion.
The Soviet (Warsaw Pact) military machine (mobile capacity) was then simply frightening! Literally thousands of state of the art, tried and tested T-'ranged' battle tanks lined-up and set to accelerate into and over the NATO nations all the way to the North Sea! Tends to focus the defensive' mind. Hence the UK's and Europe's genuine urgency is designing the VTOL system.
Good
Russia did the first SVTOL jet in 60. It was YAK-36. Yak-36 first fly in 63, Harrier first fly in 67
Anyway i really like harrier. :D
Wrong,the Hawker P1127,which was the prototype of the Harrier (they just hadn't named it yet),first flew in tether in 1960.And it was not STOVL it was VTOL!!!!
MegaWeebles Wrong. Cause Yak 36 did the first flight in 60 but only in 63 using full VTOL capacity. Same shit for p1127 that made first flight in 60 but only in 64 full VTOL flight. Anyway p1127 were only prototypes as yak 36. only 4 prototipes and all of them crashed. They are just similar to harrier but had a lot of differences. :D
And an another thing. Call SVTOL all aircrafts that can make a normal and vertical take off and landing. There are also an aicrafts that can take off or land only in vertical position so....
The British had the Short SC.1 in 1958, which is even earlier then the first Russian VTOL aircraft.
Who in their primordial mind actually came to view this and dislike it?
Would've been good to present the ENTIRE episode, yes?
1:08 all these later the tables have turned, now the press is a joke.
The Harrier is in many respects a flying marvel, but because of the nature of the aircraft it has inherent and quirky behavior especially during takeoff and landing vertically.
A lot of good pilots died trying to make that thing operational, and keeping it that way, I won't say it wasn't worth it, but I can't say it was.
Funny how the french one is called the ballzack xD
Also whether you like it or not, the harrier was invented by the British & so was the original craft & main concept.
ritchie19no2 Bloody Well Right, Mate !!
5:20 . . . . the "Ballsack" . . . . .
The Kestrel was a beautiful bird.
The aircraft that was retired was a complete redesign that came in to service in the mid 1990s.
my favorite airplane
Look at the Dornier 31. That's where the idea behind the tilting nozzles on the Harrier come from.
A desert "filled" with a vacuum and the sun shining from a black sky...
1941, the Army Air Corps signed the development contract for an XB-35 but it the first flight was in 1946 after ww2 to actaually
"The Northrop N-1M, also known by the nickname "Jeep", was an American experimental aircraft, used in the development of the flying wing concept by Northrop Aircraft during the 1940s."
That was the U.S's first main attempt at a stealth aircraft, google it :)
0:23 - NATO left with no land-base aircraft except for Harriers...
Yeah, they'd already already lost if that was the case.
WW3 was a lose-lose contest.
Those airfields were gone because they'd been nuked.
Why would they do so? The Yak was used in Afghanistan and turned out to be a complete failure. The Americans would never buy tech from a plane which was an operational disaster.
actually the 40s 1944 to be exact, and it never had any stealth properties, just because it was a flying wing didnt mean it was stealth
The harrier was made before the yak 141
Research YAK36
He said "worked on" not designed and built... and he was apparently in the RAF.
Don't get your knickers in a knot!
I read others saying it was a choice of the tornado or the harrier, that was the crux decision, top brass liked the tornado, so the better plane went- Mods to the tornado have been going on for years , and once airborn the tornado is fantastic. but it still does not have the versitility of the harrier, In desert storm, Harriers delivered over 90 ton of ordinance, from the sea 2/3 of the earth surface , they are superior, and early battle front line weopon,- from anywhere operational.
it was the germans who first tried to make a vertical takeoff plane, britian just poineered the idea
The Harrier has one engine and is nothing like the french plane.
But the Mirage was sold to france by uk which was the fairey delta 2.
the pegasus engine was a great idea. we need an updated pegasus for modern combat.
nice
VMA-211 AVENGERS
MARINE ATTACK SQUADRON
RAH!!!
And YOU do a search for the Fairey Rotodyne.
The Rotodyne did what the Osprey is doing now.
Another example of British MPs doing Americans work for them
(Search for "Blue Streak" too - American NASA used the info for Space exploration )
And the Dornier has NOTHING to do with the Harrier.
The Harrier was a simple solution for a complicated problem...For comparision the Mirage III V was supersonic, but use 8 (...) small jet engines for vertical sustentation: complicated and expansive, go never over the prototype...
Balzac?.... give a whole new meaning to cockpit
The Frogs VTOL aircraft didn't work too well but it had the best name "Le Ballsac" Awesome.
3:45 nice idea