1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say : The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object ! Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
Question: Isn't it a repulsion force, rather than an attraction force? An attraction force might result in moving to the nearest location, whereas a repulsion force would take it to the further location, it seems to me.
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say : The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object ! Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say : The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object ! Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
The ‘MEIM Motor’ solved the past problems. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released the patent documents on June 6 2019. Your welcome.
you are disinformer?. the flywheel has enough inertia to keep rotating, and lift the actuator bar magnet for a litle while and release it again by ussing a cam, to continue the loop as it began. i made one with disc magnets, and it works perfectly , few rmp, but enough
Diego Martin if your V magnet motor works, i challange you to show it to us, if you do, i will praise you in the commands and treath you with like buttons per video.
The animation is really nice... but you forget something. what if you take a 3phase electric motor as example. the same function (magnetic fields attract the opposite magnet pole), but you have 3 stators. these v-gate design needs in this design only one force who pushes it over the "end". this means it es very energy efficient if you use it with a motor as a power save motor. 80/90% energy is one turn in one direction. then the electric motor give some energy and pushes it. And yes it is not PM.
It doesn't work for you, because you just want to quit trying... Please don't encourage others to also quit! There is a balance half moon that lift the bar magnet at the exact top point. The specific weight of the half moon falling, help the continuous movement of the cylinder when it reach the end, right at the choke point, it help the continuos movement by gravity force. It will also need a small magnet bar in the bottom, that need to be timed when the half moon is at the very bottom, this also aid the continuous movement, if timed properly. There is millions ways for perpetual motion, but most of us as individuals does not have all the skills to produce a perfect machine like it's need it for perpetual motion. You should look at every video of V gate Howard Johnson in CZcams or go to motion magnetic channel and you will be the one that let the world know that this really works... Great video presentation..just inaccurate information.
It doesn't work, because it will create a balance between the first two magnets below with the magnet above. I have neodimeo magnets at home and already did some experiments.
This can work, but not as depicted here. The rotation magnets need be oriented horizontally. Right facing north and left facing south. The magnet length increasing until, they touch in the center while converging in to the center axis. The stator magnet must be much shorter.
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say : The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object ! Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
Sa -ti dau o ideie :Pui magneții pe 2 discuri ,pui un lagar central ,iar discurile lu pui in V cu un sistem mecanic tip cardan !, practic ai 3 lagare !
I am trying to contact the inventor Robert Calloway, but every e-mail address and phone number I find online is a dead end. Has anyone been able to contact him recently?
Have you found any more info on this?. I'm building one and using attracting magnets makes the lifting force for the bar pretty high when it come to the 4 across magnets. Please call me 616 698 6842..Thanks, Jim
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say : The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object ! Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
Anyone knows why it's not working ... I believe we should think out of the box.. if you want to know why it's not working start from beginning.. plz note u cant do with installing south and north magnet .....
For 15 years, I have been working with angular resonance and I am ready to do the electricity generation project together with investors who agree to make an official protocol. Everything will be done openly after the signatures are signed. 98% of the videos published on are wrong and do not work. I know the mistake they all make.
this is a poor explanation of the device . the magnets can pull or push or both . the v track turns freely & by itself for 259 degrees when the gate is lowered & stops at 359 degrees at the gate , where the gate needs to be lifted & lowered before the track can continue .
These sort of machines, made with magnets, are NOT perpetual motion machines. A perpetual motion machine must have no input of energy, and any machine made with a magnet does not fit that qualification. They're definitely cool, and I'm not suggesting that they don't work. But they aren't by definition, perpetual motion machines.
jordi3736 I had a little trouble understand your comments because of the phrasing, but I think we're on the same page. A perpetual motion machine, by definition, cannot exist. That is not to say that you can't make a machine, like the bird toy that dips it's beak into a glass of water, that will work without any noticeable energy source. But without exception, the 'perpetual motion machines' that you see on youtube have a source of energy. In the case of this video, the machine was using magnetic energy as source for motion. In the case of the classic bird toy, it uses the heat (energy) from the air around it. These machines are definitely cool, and they may have practical, real world applications. But they aren't perpetual motion machines because they draw energy from a source, in this case magnetism.
The perpetual motion machines actually have a source of energy, which is gravity. In the above example the machine does not work, because it has to be through repulsion, not attraction.
When you have a device that has output . . higher than the input . . you have perpetual motion. So if there is an input power of any sort and the machine has to have an output greater than . . then it can self-supply with a net gain in power output. This design is clumsy and could perhaps work but I do not see balance to achieve higher speeds and doubtful if potential output is worth the effort. The magnets on the discharge side will work against the magnets on the receiving side greatly reducing power output of the actual theory. The point of recycle with the magnets on the armature (where it jumps across back to start) will create an imbalance due to the increased forces at that point, there would have to be a change in spacing at that point to help balance, I just visualize surging. Bottom line . . if it actually works it would be very low actual output of power. There is an easy way to direct the forces more effectively on the armature, by simply using magnets at a slight angle, with a tapered edge.
With the stubbornness of a maniac, you want a small (mass) magnet to move a larger wheel with a greater mass. Do the opposite, don't imitate - move the small magnet, leave the wheel still (◠‿◕)
Nice waste of time, not enough force? okay so magnet with a good 120 KG of pulling power isn't powerful in your opinion i guess? It can be done its all about timing and balancing weights plus low friction as possible. Its not that it can't be achieved its the fact we don't get enough surplus energy to be some thing tangible.
+James Smith Yes all these projects only fail because they need more wood and more magnets. More magnets! MORE MAGNETS! OMG SO CLOSE NEED MORE MAGNETS! Just a few more magnets and it will work! MORE MORE MORE MAGNETS!
James Smith - I am not a scientific guy by a long shot. I was wondering why such a motor could not function as a windmill does. Is it the case that the magnets don't have enough force to spin a device quickly/forcefully enough to generate any meaningful energy output?
+mammothfilms when the megents are spinning they come into contact with eachother either attracting, which will pull themselves together. Will help on approach although whist leaving each other it becomes a problem. Another problem is is reserve you want them to push away whist leaving but attracting on approach. Thia creates friction, which will slow it down. Can't overcome it with more powerful megnets as it make the matters worse. Providing they're pushing and pulling at the right time it will maintain their momentum. Potential speed will still be reduced by the friction. Overall momentum may be enough to keep it going however may not have enough to be used for anything else or much else.
lol. spent so much effort to make a video to explain why it doesn't work. the original V-gate has a mechanism that PUSH the main magnet up when the cycle ended. czcams.com/video/FLek_3Hpwus/video.html
First of all, your design isn't even balanced. You have too many magnets in one row which means your device will get stuck heavy end down. Then, you need to build an asymmetrical arm that is symmetrical in weight despite being asymmetrical in shape. This arm will be used to push the suspended magnet attractor so that is temporarily distanced from the magnets. You will want to use gravity to bring this back as gears result in friction which results in loss. The angle of the arm and the distance pushed away must be as gradual/minimal as possible else you will lose momentum due to forces or friction. The idea isn't to get an infinite cycle as that is impossible. Think more along the lines of the difference in quality between a bicycle wheel made in China compared to a racing bicycle wheel made in Italy. The difference is enormous and as a result you can perpetuate the spin a lot longer. You will never get 'free' energy however you can perpetuate the spin a long time and use other things like Wind, Solar, Water current etc to help trigger the device so you can use it to make beautiful things like Kinetic Art. The idea in any thing should be optimization and any optimization is a good thing because it affects other things. For example, using better wheel bearing allows a rider to travel further with a reduced energy cost. Likewise, Kinetic art can spin a little longer until the wind comes back to get the momentum really going again.
Again that stupid thing. Spiral nor angle magnet positionning will never make a difference, will you understand that. Many hobbyists before you have tried. Do not draw the magnets but only the magnetic fields as spheres. And draw the vectors between center of magnetic fields. And you will understand you have to forgot the visual illusion.
Great vid. Im expecting to see hundreds of Homemade V gate Pitching machine videos uploaded soon.
nice graphics thx.
thanks for the helpful information.
I have a drawing of this same idea 20 years ago. But it is designed different. My innovative idea.
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say :
The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object !
Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
Can I leave a video source and use it for non-commercial purposes?
Question: Isn't it a repulsion force, rather than an attraction force? An attraction force might result in moving to the nearest location, whereas a repulsion force would take it to the further location, it seems to me.
What program do you use?
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say :
The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object !
Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
Move the above magnet away before it reaches the middle and quickly put it closer... This is to prevent the motor from stopping at the middle.
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say :
The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object !
Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
@@FloTelip what is the point of pasting the same comment multiple times first? Tho yes ppl make mistakes
PiotrK This is the perpetual motion comment ! 😉😆
Seriously I thought this was very important and I thought sad not to hear this detail in the video !
@@FloTelip Voyager dude lmao. Idk if u understood the sentence people make mistakes
The ‘MEIM Motor’ solved the past problems. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) released the patent documents on June 6 2019. Your welcome.
you are disinformer?. the flywheel has enough inertia to keep rotating, and lift the actuator bar magnet for a litle while and release it again by ussing a cam, to continue the loop as it began. i made one with disc magnets, and it works perfectly , few rmp, but enough
lol yeah, it doesn't work but his hopes up.
Diego Martin monopolar magnets don't exist
Diego Martin if your V magnet motor works, i challange you to show it to us, if you do, i will praise you in the commands and treath you with like buttons per video.
@@johneygd czcams.com/video/zqG-TL0WnjE/video.html
The animation is really nice... but you forget something. what if you take a 3phase electric motor as example. the same function (magnetic fields attract the opposite magnet pole), but you have 3 stators. these v-gate design needs in this design only one force who pushes it over the "end". this means it es very energy efficient if you use it with a motor as a power save motor. 80/90% energy is one turn in one direction. then the electric motor give some energy and pushes it. And yes it is not PM.
It doesn't work for you, because you just want to quit trying... Please don't encourage others to also quit! There is a balance half moon that lift the bar magnet at the exact top point. The specific weight of the half moon falling, help the continuous movement of the cylinder when it reach the end, right at the choke point, it help the continuos movement by gravity force. It will also need a small magnet bar in the bottom, that need to be timed when the half moon is at the very bottom, this also aid the continuous movement, if timed properly. There is millions ways for perpetual motion, but most of us as individuals does not have all the skills to produce a perfect machine like it's need it for perpetual motion. You should look at every video of V gate Howard Johnson in CZcams or go to motion magnetic channel and you will be the one that let the world know that this really works... Great video presentation..just inaccurate information.
I have a simple solution that will make this work. Do you have the ability to test a design?
how to create this 3d animation??
More your free energy video
if excluding the 2 inner magnets at start point and let kinetic force do the job...
There is a simple solution for this and wish I had the ability to make it
Principle is through
It doesn't work, because it will create a balance between the first two magnets below with the magnet above.
I have neodimeo magnets at home and already did some experiments.
Cost of neodymium magnet ?
This can work, but not as depicted here. The rotation magnets need be oriented horizontally. Right facing north and left facing south. The magnet length increasing until, they touch in the center while converging in to the center axis. The stator magnet must be much shorter.
Did you build a machine exactly like this one
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say :
The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object !
Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
Can I explain my ideas to you and see what you think because I think this can work and not violate any laws and thermodynamics
Sa -ti dau o ideie :Pui magneții pe 2 discuri ,pui un lagar central ,iar discurile lu pui in V cu un sistem mecanic tip cardan !, practic ai 3 lagare !
Этот дизайн противоречет простым системам которые нормально работаю .Если изменить дизайн то тогда все будет работать .
I am trying to contact the inventor Robert Calloway, but every e-mail address and phone number I find online is a dead end. Has anyone been able to contact him recently?
Have you found any more info on this?. I'm building one and using attracting magnets makes the lifting force for the bar pretty high when it come to the 4 across magnets. Please call me 616 698 6842..Thanks, Jim
it work tho
1:50 OK ! *But you forgot a physical law* that say :
The force you needed to accelerate a mass to a speed *must be* the same to stop completely this object !
Sum of F = m * a (Newton law)
Anyone knows why it's not working ... I believe we should think out of the box.. if you want to know why it's not working start from beginning.. plz note u cant do with installing south and north magnet .....
Copernicus was berned for truth
For 15 years, I have been working with angular resonance and I am ready to do the electricity generation project together with investors who agree to make an official protocol. Everything will be done openly after the signatures are signed. 98% of the videos published on are wrong and do not work. I know the mistake they all make.
This is not perpetual motion. it's just running until magnets lose their energy...so it's a very long time duration motor, but not perpetual!!!!
this is a poor explanation of the device . the magnets can pull or push or both . the v track turns freely & by itself for 259 degrees when the gate is lowered & stops at 359 degrees at the gate , where the gate needs to be lifted & lowered before the track can continue .
This would work in theory except monopolar magnets don't exist.
Their is a mathematical equation showing that is can exit
These sort of machines, made with magnets, are NOT perpetual motion machines. A perpetual motion machine must have no input of energy, and any machine made with a magnet does not fit that qualification. They're definitely cool, and I'm not suggesting that they don't work. But they aren't by definition, perpetual motion machines.
The magnets are inside the system , does aren`t input energy from outside. The perpetual motion machine don't exist.
jordi3736 I had a little trouble understand your comments because of the phrasing, but I think we're on the same page. A perpetual motion machine, by definition, cannot exist. That is not to say that you can't make a machine, like the bird toy that dips it's beak into a glass of water, that will work without any noticeable energy source. But without exception, the 'perpetual motion machines' that you see on youtube have a source of energy. In the case of this video, the machine was using magnetic energy as source for motion. In the case of the classic bird toy, it uses the heat (energy) from the air around it.
These machines are definitely cool, and they may have practical, real world applications. But they aren't perpetual motion machines because they draw energy from a source, in this case magnetism.
I'm agree !
The perpetual motion machines actually have a source of energy, which is gravity. In the above example the machine does not work, because it has to be through repulsion, not attraction.
When you have a device that has output . . higher than the input . . you have perpetual motion. So if there is an input power of any sort and the machine has to have an output greater than . . then it can self-supply with a net gain in power output. This design is clumsy and could perhaps work but I do not see balance to achieve higher speeds and doubtful if potential output is worth the effort. The magnets on the discharge side will work against the magnets on the receiving side greatly reducing power output of the actual theory. The point of recycle with the magnets on the armature (where it jumps across back to start) will create an imbalance due to the increased forces at that point, there would have to be a change in spacing at that point to help balance, I just visualize surging. Bottom line . . if it actually works it would be very low actual output of power. There is an easy way to direct the forces more effectively on the armature, by simply using magnets at a slight angle, with a tapered edge.
With the stubbornness of a maniac, you want a small (mass) magnet to move a larger wheel with a greater mass. Do the opposite, don't imitate - move the small magnet, leave the wheel still (◠‿◕)
Good draw in 3D. But it dont work
How do you know it does not work?
@@SINLEADSTOHELL even this work it's good to see ur self for ur happiness.. we cant use such a maching for useful thing .... sir ...
Nice waste of time, not enough force? okay so magnet with a good 120 KG of pulling power isn't powerful in your opinion i guess? It can be done its all about timing and balancing weights plus low friction as possible. Its not that it can't be achieved its the fact we don't get enough surplus energy to be some thing tangible.
+James Smith Yes all these projects only fail because they need more wood and more magnets. More magnets! MORE MAGNETS! OMG SO CLOSE NEED MORE MAGNETS! Just a few more magnets and it will work! MORE MORE MORE MAGNETS!
Lol
James Smith - I am not a scientific guy by a long shot. I was wondering why such a motor could not function as a windmill does. Is it the case that the magnets don't have enough force to spin a device quickly/forcefully enough to generate any meaningful energy output?
+mammothfilms when the megents are spinning they come into contact with eachother either attracting, which will pull themselves together. Will help on approach although whist leaving each other it becomes a problem. Another problem is is reserve you want them to push away whist leaving but attracting on approach.
Thia creates friction, which will slow it down. Can't overcome it with more powerful megnets as it make the matters worse. Providing they're pushing and pulling at the right time it will maintain their momentum. Potential speed will still be reduced by the friction.
Overall momentum may be enough to keep it going however may not have enough to be used for anything else or much else.
James Smith thank you!
lol. spent so much effort to make a video to explain why it doesn't work. the original V-gate has a mechanism that PUSH the main magnet up when the cycle ended. czcams.com/video/FLek_3Hpwus/video.html
To push the main magnet you need a force and this stop the movement.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️
First of all, your design isn't even balanced. You have too many magnets in one row which means your device will get stuck heavy end down. Then, you need to build an asymmetrical arm that is symmetrical in weight despite being asymmetrical in shape. This arm will be used to push the suspended magnet attractor so that is temporarily distanced from the magnets. You will want to use gravity to bring this back as gears result in friction which results in loss. The angle of the arm and the distance pushed away must be as gradual/minimal as possible else you will lose momentum due to forces or friction. The idea isn't to get an infinite cycle as that is impossible. Think more along the lines of the difference in quality between a bicycle wheel made in China compared to a racing bicycle wheel made in Italy. The difference is enormous and as a result you can perpetuate the spin a lot longer. You will never get 'free' energy however you can perpetuate the spin a long time and use other things like Wind, Solar, Water current etc to help trigger the device so you can use it to make beautiful things like Kinetic Art. The idea in any thing should be optimization and any optimization is a good thing because it affects other things. For example, using better wheel bearing allows a rider to travel further with a reduced energy cost. Likewise, Kinetic art can spin a little longer until the wind comes back to get the momentum really going again.
Absurd - wrong konstruction.
Bello l'impegno ma è errato il disegno meccanico.
Again that stupid thing. Spiral nor angle magnet positionning will never make a difference, will you understand that. Many hobbyists before you have tried. Do not draw the magnets but only the magnetic fields as spheres. And draw the vectors between center of magnetic fields. And you will understand you have to forgot the visual illusion.
Watched for 5 seconds, enough to hear the stupid music and left.