I love this. An elected political leader actually standing up to bigotry rather than pandering to it. Playing to facts, not prejudice. And a talkback radio presenter actually presenting a fair & balanced, unsensationalist, fact-based view of things. I miss Keating.
Pay attention kids, in the olden days it was possible for a politician to string more than three words together in a sentence. Not only that a conservative talkback host could on occasion actually use facts to inform their audience.
@@TheNakedWombat Historically Labor was far more conservative than the Liberal Party (hence the latter's name.) 26 years of Liberal government ironed that right out of them.
@@TheNakedWombat Maybe because Labor had been around a long time, and introduced the White Australia policy, as well as the other protectionist/nationalization policies they espoused. There was no early push for any sort of liberal policy in the early days. Labor wanted men working, Australians white, and women at home. Australia was protectionist under the Commonwealth model, and communism also came along and hamstrung the Labor party because they would not ban the far left (whether Labor was too far to the left was irrelevant, people believed they were sympathizers), which resulted in the infamous DLP split. Labor was considered to be the "conservatives" in this era because we were already protectionist, whereas the "Free-traders" became the "Liberals", although this was primarily in relation to economics. This was probably the party that Laws associated with in the 50s (this old idea that Australia should be looking after themselves first.) This didn't resolve until Whitlam reconciled the two groups (and compromised by ridding themselves of nationalization, to an extent), but adding social liberalism, which had became prevalent in both "city" parties since the 60s. It was not until Hawke and Keating that economic liberalism was taken seriously, although it will always would be a centrist approach. The left believe that social liberty has become aligned to their philosophy, but this was not always the case. The left has changed substantially since the 60s, and this has influenced what policies are promoted. A similar sort of story also occurred in the United States; the Democrats were the conservatives until the 1960s, but once women's rights took off, the religious and social conservatives realized they did not have a home, and did a deal with economic liberals and migrated to the Republicans in the 1980s. The coalition in Australia has the same weird group of social conservative and economic liberals, but they don't always agree or get along.
@@redundantideas Both political parties were to the left of where they now stand. The Liberal Party was also into white nationalist beliefs and Robert Menzies idolised Hitler as a wonderful but his heart and dick throbbed for a young Queen. All of them evolved while in some ways remaining the same. Today the LNP and ALP are so similar that they're barely indistinguishable. The difference though is that today's LNP are Classical Liberals while the ALP are cowards. Much of Menzies' rhetoric would show that the LNP would consider him as a leftist ideologue. Conservatism though. Labor was socially conservative but not economically due to the sheer number of Catholics running the party who have now shifted to the Liberals, hence their wacky mouth points on religion and their inability to care about child abuse.
Keating really was a visionary; he had a vision for how he wanted Australia to be. He was trying to educate Australians about our history and our future;
11:24 Caller: "I'm not racist but every person I talk to..." Keating: "Well that's what they all say don't they?... They alway say, 'I'm not racist but...'" Great to see a politician with some fire. Would be nice to see another one in 2014.
Time is kind to Keating. He seems a decent man...You have to look past his appearance of arrogance and bluster. He seemed a divisive figure in his day but in reflection he was deep down a man of principles and regardless of how the electorate viewed him, he was not going to compromise. Fiscally, socially, politically, culturally, he was ahead of his time. Btw, he never had a vote from me.
Gone are the days when a sitting prime minister has the balls to call racism for what it is. This is perspective in action. And you realize at the end of it that gosh... we've really sunk
He was the most progressive PM we'd ever had, rightfully calling out racists on live-radio, and Australia answered him by electing John Howard for three terms. This country's a backwater.
Socially and intellectually he was incredibly progressive and gifted, economically he was a disaster (and I’m being kind). Australia (and much of the rest of the west these days, apart from perhaps Germany) seems to reel between too much one or the other with its leadership, Keating included. This in turn just triggers and sets up those on the extremes of both paradigms to scream louder and the cycle continues.
sjb2471 we could do with a strong Labor Government presently in Australia to steer us out of the recession with minimum social damage and to avoid a depression .
"the whites have been held back, I am not arguing on a racial side of this business" The caller literally said those 2 sentences back to back, just hilarious and such an insight into people like thats mindset
Apart from the brilliant performance of Keating, that was par for the course, it must be noted that John Laws was the premier conservative talk show host of this day. He was as conservative and reactionary as they come, yet he was able to have a sensible dialogue and did not just pander to the ignorance of his audience. John Laws here was genuinely trying to raise the level of debate, something that the likes of Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Neil Mitchell, and the Sky News clown brigade do not attempt to do today.
Yeah, that's true. If any Labor leader of today did this (not just Albanese), they would immediately get shouted down by the host if it was this sort of program. They wouldn't be allowed to finish their points. And this isn't to give Albanese or the Labor party an excuse for everything. But, as you say, certain things must be noted.
The attitudes of theses callers is still alive and well in Australia today. People think dispossession was a single event in 1788. The view of the callers is basically, buy the land we stole from you even though there is no freehold\lease hold on the land and you still live on it.
It is great to hear this interview 30 years on and see PK as PM defend and explain the Mabo decision and actually try to educate people who hold contentious or racist views towards indigenous people. He smashed them 🤣❤
@@he.5865 Must be based off the fact that he was handed one of the fastest growing economies in the world, during a mining boom, during a surplus, and still managed to place our OECD economic rating from third to tenth and funnel 3/4 of the wealth created by the mining boom to multinational mining corporations. Way to go Johnny boy.
If John Howard was PM that day, he would have agreed with all the callers, and then added that the government had information that indigenous throw their children overboard 😂 Thank goodness we had Keating!
The resemblance from this interview to the current voice debate is astounding. Just like Mabo the only argument against the voice it is exactly as Keating said it’s nothing but prejudice
if only there were more politicians today who would not think twice about putting stupid and bigoted people in their place, like Keating would do, rather than obsessively follow the focus group lines, then things would be a bit better.
To be fair, the cultural climate has changed significantly since 1992. If a leader responded to callback this way today they'd be crucified in the media. Part of the problem is that everyone has an opinion and many become outraged if theirs is ever challenged or torn apart.
It was a disastrous turn this country took when John Howard defeated Keating. He was a fantastic PM and even as a young adult I was compelled to be an audience to his great Leadership and policies that changed Australia at the time. Fast forward today and every successive leader since have had nothing to offer and have lead our country to its worst economic state in its entire political History.
The callers only feel that they can be considered equal if they are elevated above others so they can look down on other races, actually being equal to everyone else is not an option for them and Aboriginal Australians are distant second class citizens as far as they're concerned
They were there most of the ones you're familiar with from the Howard government we're all their pay attention dismissing all this they were actually agreeing with the people who were ringing up they were feeding it and feeling it I remember all the indigenous Australians turning their backs on John Howard it filled me with pride far as I was concerned they were showing in my back I'm not indigenous Australian I can't imagine what it's like to suffer all the ongoing and justices in health outcomes life expectancy income potential to be incarcerated Family Violence alcoholism you name it fact of the matter is he all stemmed from the original sin dispossessing them of their land that started everything frankly that's where the must have and did at least start to be addressed John Howard and I don't often make personal criticisms unless they're personally earned it John Howard the fuckwhit torpedoed our progress our progress as a nation on this issue and so many many many others is Prime ministership on our honour our wealth our reputation how self-respect how incomes our retirement you name it he fucked it
The Keatings of today are nowhere to be seen. Brave to be different and to take on responsibility of unfavourable policies. Keating brought a nation together not to divide it. He was fare and just in his philosophy. Keating vision in 1993 has paid off today 2022 Australia lives in a much unified form.
The caller was stubbornly ignorant and refused to let the facts get in the way of his prejudices. As far as to whether Keating helped a single Aboriginal person, what's your basis in that. You claim he consigned "them" to a victim mentality... after 200 year of dispossession, kidnap, sanctioned murder, miseducation, indentured servitude and wage theft coupled with being considered fauna in the living memory of yo mama would make me feel a bit victimised.
Wow! How about the bigots! Keating sets the standard for everyone regarding equality. Imagine a world where talkback is a fair, balanced and focussed on facts. The up and coming referendum on an Indigenous Voice will test how far we have grown over the last 30 years...
It's very interesting to watch that, because nothing has changed. Now in 2023, we have Anthony Albanese doing the same kind of thing. Labor and the Greens think that Aboriginals born TODAY, deserve more than every other race born in Australia TODAY. (The Liberal and National Party is weak and no better). They think the history dating back well before everyone today was alive, gives Aboriginals special rights due to their race. If that was true, then every country around the world could do the same kind of thing. Go back through world history and try to find a country that was not invaded by another country. It's all part of world history and it has nothing to do with people born today.
I agree with you that nothing has changed. Aboriginal people continue to have far less than the rest of us because of their treatment since European settlement. They had their lives, land, culture and identity taken away and it's not even close to being resolved. We are nowhere near equality, let alone giving them more than the rest of us.
17 percent interest rates, the demise of Australian manufacturing, the $190 b govt debt for Howard and Costello to pay off and the recession we had to have. It was a tough time.
Your facts are so wrong,youre 190 billion deficit?give me some facts about that claim.Rudds gfc stimulus was only around 50 to 60 billion to which the libs doubled in the first 12 months
The policy of raising interest rates saved our economic future. It forced Australians to stop consuming credit and driving up house prices at the same time killing our terms of trade. It forced investment into other areas of the economy and greatly improved development of new industries, and steadily reducing unemployment. Inflation would have destroyed us if this hadn't occurred.
26 years recession ever since there is a shame we had to have we haven't had it don't think it was Peter Costello Magic Touch he didn't do anything at all all he did was changed the tax system which is nothing the GST is a fucking shit tax poorly implemented hawke-keating governments salvage the verge of fucking ourselves completely we already fucked all about industry by keeping the protected for so long that they made such a shit product for such price they could not compete with international import which were a fart superior product at a fraction of the price that's why they went belly up because they were shit you know what the result of having a shithouse manufacturing sector that supplies us with all their goods is well I'll tell you it's we are poor because we can't buy anything and what we buy is shit and just you know which way to change your opinion in either event because he wouldn't let the facts get in the way would you when John Howard was treasurer and he was treasurer before Hawke & Keating took over interest rates reach 26% you intellectual rustbucket
Paul Keating's Logic has created the precedent to potentially dismiss the constitutional title of the Nation over the Land of Australia. Australia needs a "Federal Constitutional Court" to supervise and re-balance any law or judicial decision of severe implication for the Nation or even the privatisation of Justice, but at the same time all institutional powers - Constitutional Court included as part of the Judicial Power - must be in equilibrium in between themselves. In the formula of institutional balance we should neither forget the Crown! In other words the existing High Court alone cannot make final decision about the "Terra Nullius" and Aboriginal entitlement of evident and/or potential detriment to the Constitution of Australia and the Sovereignty of the Nation under the terms of such constitution.
Labor didn't give Mabo, it was a decision of the High Court of Australia. Labor don't treat Aborigines as political tools. Labor treat them with some respect which is more than what LNP do, which is nothing
The British invaded what's now known as Australia and in doing so, dispossessed the Aboriginals; Mabo was an artifice of the left to create a special class of Australians with more rights and privileges than other Australians.
I love this. An elected political leader actually standing up to bigotry rather than pandering to it. Playing to facts, not prejudice. And a talkback radio presenter actually presenting a fair & balanced, unsensationalist, fact-based view of things.
I miss Keating.
So sorry for you Dave; you have no idea whats going on.
bullsnutsoz Dave is spot on.... this isn't done any more and it should be. Politicians simply do not face the people.... whatever the topic.
Keating works for the same masters they all do. Where do we fit into this.
Thanks for the like audio, we are in the lobster trap being sucked dry by facist/commie octopus disguised as our salvation: both sides!
Ken W. Simpson proof?
"Oh, well thank you for your anthropological advice"
Gold
"I am not here to soak up all your prejudices." Pure Keating.
Nailed it.
Pay attention kids, in the olden days it was possible for a politician to string more than three words together in a sentence. Not only that a conservative talkback host could on occasion actually use facts to inform their audience.
Laws was a self admitted Labor man.
@@TheNakedWombat Historically Labor was far more conservative than the Liberal Party (hence the latter's name.) 26 years of Liberal government ironed that right out of them.
@@redundantideas Where do you get that idea from?
@@TheNakedWombat Maybe because Labor had been around a long time, and introduced the White Australia policy, as well as the other protectionist/nationalization policies they espoused. There was no early push for any sort of liberal policy in the early days. Labor wanted men working, Australians white, and women at home.
Australia was protectionist under the Commonwealth model, and communism also came along and hamstrung the Labor party because they would not ban the far left (whether Labor was too far to the left was irrelevant, people believed they were sympathizers), which resulted in the infamous DLP split. Labor was considered to be the "conservatives" in this era because we were already protectionist, whereas the "Free-traders" became the "Liberals", although this was primarily in relation to economics. This was probably the party that Laws associated with in the 50s (this old idea that Australia should be looking after themselves first.)
This didn't resolve until Whitlam reconciled the two groups (and compromised by ridding themselves of nationalization, to an extent), but adding social liberalism, which had became prevalent in both "city" parties since the 60s. It was not until Hawke and Keating that economic liberalism was taken seriously, although it will always would be a centrist approach. The left believe that social liberty has become aligned to their philosophy, but this was not always the case.
The left has changed substantially since the 60s, and this has influenced what policies are promoted. A similar sort of story also occurred in the United States; the Democrats were the conservatives until the 1960s, but once women's rights took off, the religious and social conservatives realized they did not have a home, and did a deal with economic liberals and migrated to the Republicans in the 1980s. The coalition in Australia has the same weird group of social conservative and economic liberals, but they don't always agree or get along.
@@redundantideas
Both political parties were to the left of where they now stand. The Liberal Party was also into white nationalist beliefs and Robert Menzies idolised Hitler as a wonderful but his heart and dick throbbed for a young Queen.
All of them evolved while in some ways remaining the same.
Today the LNP and ALP are so similar that they're barely indistinguishable. The difference though is that today's LNP are Classical Liberals while the ALP are cowards. Much of Menzies' rhetoric would show that the LNP would consider him as a leftist ideologue.
Conservatism though. Labor was socially conservative but not economically due to the sheer number of Catholics running the party who have now shifted to the Liberals, hence their wacky mouth points on religion and their inability to care about child abuse.
An impressive performance by Mr. Keating. He can rightly be proud of his leadership and legacy.
Keating really was a visionary; he had a vision for how he wanted Australia to be. He was trying to educate Australians about our history and our future;
dude, I don't know who your dealer is ,but they're tainting your product
Less than a year to an election, tipped to lose it, the PM still comes out swinging against the prejudices of these callers. Just marvellous.
Less than one year to an election? This video is titled June 1993. The '93 election had just taken place in March.
More like 3 years to an election.
@@fincarosa The title of the video itself says 1992 and, given Mabo was decided on 3 June 1992, I think that's the more likely timing.
This was definitely 1992. Keating took office in December 1991.
11:24 Caller: "I'm not racist but every person I talk to..."
Keating: "Well that's what they all say don't they?... They alway say, 'I'm not racist but...'"
Great to see a politician with some fire. Would be nice to see another one in 2014.
or 2018
Most definitely 2022 and out with the Libs!
2014? ... try 2023
Some day...
"To go forward together as a people means we have to go forward together on terms on which we all agree".
The last part of this video is easily the best. Keating is being influential, and is encouraging all sides to aspire to something better.
its so hilarious how Paul Keating just roasts everyone
@@pmenadue I believe that it is called telling the truth.
Time is kind to Keating. He seems a decent man...You have to look past his appearance of arrogance and bluster. He seemed a divisive figure in his day but in reflection he was deep down a man of principles and regardless of how the electorate viewed him, he was not going to compromise. Fiscally, socially, politically, culturally, he was ahead of his time. Btw, he never had a vote from me.
Gone are the days when a sitting prime minister has the balls to call racism for what it is. This is perspective in action. And you realize at the end of it that gosh... we've really sunk
He was the most progressive PM we'd ever had, rightfully calling out racists on live-radio, and Australia answered him by electing John Howard for three terms. This country's a backwater.
Keating was tolerant with this racist caller .
Socially and intellectually he was incredibly progressive and gifted, economically he was a disaster (and I’m being kind).
Australia (and much of the rest of the west these days, apart from perhaps Germany) seems to reel between too much one or the other with its leadership, Keating included. This in turn just triggers and sets up those on the extremes of both paradigms to scream louder and the cycle continues.
sjb2471 we could do with a strong Labor Government presently in Australia to steer us out of the recession with minimum social damage and to avoid a depression .
Keating made us the richest people on Earth on wealth per capita basis. Superannuation peeps!
@@sjb2471 lol talk about nonsense
Keating was a visionary. His word are even more profound today.
Paul Keating was brilliant! Not pandering to prejudice - so great!
Australia needs another Paul Keating
One of them we need a whole Army of them even better we need a whole nation of them
I believe you got your wish with the new treasure
Not much left to sell off after his fire sale then Howard privatised everything.. Think we need less neoliberalism not more.
"the whites have been held back, I am not arguing on a racial side of this business"
The caller literally said those 2 sentences back to back, just hilarious and such an insight into people like thats mindset
Apart from the brilliant performance of Keating, that was par for the course, it must be noted that John Laws was the premier conservative talk show host of this day. He was as conservative and reactionary as they come, yet he was able to have a sensible dialogue and did not just pander to the ignorance of his audience. John Laws here was genuinely trying to raise the level of debate, something that the likes of Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Neil Mitchell, and the Sky News clown brigade do not attempt to do today.
Great observation. It wasn't lost on me and a sign of how far things have shifted.
Yeah, that's true. If any Labor leader of today did this (not just Albanese), they would immediately get shouted down by the host if it was this sort of program. They wouldn't be allowed to finish their points.
And this isn't to give Albanese or the Labor party an excuse for everything. But, as you say, certain things must be noted.
This is one of the key points about this video, bad as Laws could be, on this he was decent in a way todays right wing shock jocks wouldn't
laws was several dozen times smarter than you.
The attitudes of theses callers is still alive and well in Australia today. People think dispossession was a single event in 1788. The view of the callers is basically, buy the land we stole from you even though there is no freehold\lease hold on the land and you still live on it.
Indeed. You can put that down to generations of racially stereotyping indigenous people as lazy, unworthy or undeserving.
They paid for their own ancestorial land with the blood of their own when the British slaughtered them.
This is still a relevant conversation today
Fuck me talk back has changed. Even John Laws seems reasonable
It is great to hear this interview 30 years on and see PK as PM defend and explain the Mabo decision and actually try to educate people who hold contentious or racist views towards indigenous people. He smashed them 🤣❤
the best Aussie pm ever for all Aussie's my opinion only
Nope; Johnny Howard.
In my opinion as well
@@LimeFries Are u serious? Based off what? It can't be policy.
@@he.5865 Must be based off the fact that he was handed one of the fastest growing economies in the world, during a mining boom, during a surplus, and still managed to place our OECD economic rating from third to tenth and funnel 3/4 of the wealth created by the mining boom to multinational mining corporations. Way to go Johnny boy.
Laws was actually polite and intelligent and even handed. This must be a fake.
13:49 Keating gives a wholesome response to this guy's question
Keating was one of the few Labor politicians that originated from a working class background.
Paul Keating was a giant. This is a Prime Minister we can be proud of. Makes me so proud to be Australian when I see this.
If John Howard was PM that day, he would have agreed with all the callers, and then added that the government had information that indigenous throw their children overboard 😂
Thank goodness we had Keating!
12:27 - Answering talk-back while drinking a cup of tea.
Paul Keating: the greatest Australian. Period
He was right to dimiss the caller. the caller was uninformed on the subject. always better to deal with fact than opinion.
that good ol Keating backbone
The resemblance from this interview to the current voice debate is astounding. Just like Mabo the only argument against the voice it is exactly as Keating said it’s nothing but prejudice
Mr Paul Keating. I respect u. I'm ethnic Chinese, for wats its worth.
This man was ahead of his time....
“Well thank you for your Anthropological advice…” Classic PK.
"How do I tell this fellow that we stole all their land without getting the government into a lot of jolly trouble..."
An amazing wordsmith 🙏🙏
if only there were more politicians today who would not think twice about putting stupid and bigoted people in their place, like Keating would do, rather than obsessively follow the focus group lines, then things would be a bit better.
+Leigh Douglas Well said indeed !! that is in fact what true leaders do Leigh .
To be fair, the cultural climate has changed significantly since 1992. If a leader responded to callback this way today they'd be crucified in the media. Part of the problem is that everyone has an opinion and many become outraged if theirs is ever challenged or torn apart.
These days, the only places that these people get put in are ones with power
It was a disastrous turn this country took when John Howard defeated Keating. He was a fantastic PM and even as a young adult I was compelled to be an audience to his great Leadership and policies that changed Australia at the time. Fast forward today and every successive leader since have had nothing to offer and have lead our country to its worst economic state in its entire political History.
Classic Keating
Back when our politicians put these bigots in their place instead of grovelling up to them.
The callers only feel that they can be considered equal if they are elevated above others so they can look down on other races, actually being equal to everyone else is not an option for them and Aboriginal Australians are distant second class citizens as far as they're concerned
Libs could learn from the old days
They were there most of the ones you're familiar with from the Howard government we're all their pay attention dismissing all this they were actually agreeing with the people who were ringing up they were feeding it and feeling it I remember all the indigenous Australians turning their backs on John Howard it filled me with pride far as I was concerned they were showing in my back I'm not indigenous Australian I can't imagine what it's like to suffer all the ongoing and justices in health outcomes life expectancy income potential to be incarcerated Family Violence alcoholism you name it fact of the matter is he all stemmed from the original sin dispossessing them of their land that started everything frankly that's where the must have and did at least start to be addressed John Howard and I don't often make personal criticisms unless they're personally earned it John Howard the fuckwhit torpedoed our progress our progress as a nation on this issue and so many many many others is Prime ministership on our honour our wealth our reputation how self-respect how incomes our retirement you name it he fucked it
The Keatings of today are nowhere to be seen. Brave to be different and to take on responsibility of unfavourable policies.
Keating brought a nation together not to divide it. He was fare and just in his philosophy. Keating vision in 1993 has paid off today 2022 Australia lives in a much unified form.
"A country gets the politicians it deserves". I guess we fucked up there now that Abbott is in power and not this man here.
This is a Aboriginal country weather we like it or not.
What a born to rule smartarse this caller is,Keating put him right.
The caller was stubbornly ignorant and refused to let the facts get in the way of his prejudices. As far as to whether Keating helped a single Aboriginal person, what's your basis in that. You claim he consigned "them" to a victim mentality... after 200 year of dispossession, kidnap, sanctioned murder, miseducation, indentured servitude and wage theft coupled with being considered fauna in the living memory of yo mama would make me feel a bit victimised.
maybo
Rights and Sovereignty are not to be confused Mr Keating!
11:27 I've seen it myself a number of times but in this part of the world.
Reminds me of Shorten's address to the Australian Christian Lobby.
👍
✊😇👍
5:24 soak up all your prejudices LOL
Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!
2018 and these racist flops are still around in the form of Abbott and Dutton 😂
Groomed by Howard
I thought crossed my mind it was actually Andrew Bolt trying out all these different put on voices
We need a priminister like him again,labour or liberal,not like the idiots we have in parliament now.
poor Paul dealing with these dummies. still plenty of them around these days too.
This interview wasn't in 1992. It was June 17th 1993.
First Australia needs a Treaty, it will solve the problems and prejudices about Land Claims
Love ya mr laws
11:03 We-see-them-as-equal..
Do you know what is more sad? I just sent a fax today referring a patient to another specialist...
ª
times have changed...
👣🌏🕵🏻♂️☯️🌌
That first caller was frustrating with his constant interruptions
This shits on Gillard's moment in the Sun. He was like this everyday. No PM has come close.
8:09 there was too many tribes an’ clans an’ whateva!
10:26 no..err..no
11:10 he calls out a racist.
Old Australia v New Australia
brown tongue
lol 4 racists in 83 ppl nice
Wow! How about the bigots! Keating sets the standard for everyone regarding equality. Imagine a world where talkback is a fair, balanced and focussed on facts. The up and coming referendum on an Indigenous Voice will test how far we have grown over the last 30 years...
It's very interesting to watch that, because nothing has changed. Now in 2023, we have Anthony Albanese doing the same kind of thing. Labor and the Greens think that Aboriginals born TODAY, deserve more than every other race born in Australia TODAY. (The Liberal and National Party is weak and no better). They think the history dating back well before everyone today was alive, gives Aboriginals special rights due to their race. If that was true, then every country around the world could do the same kind of thing. Go back through world history and try to find a country that was not invaded by another country. It's all part of world history and it has nothing to do with people born today.
I agree with you that nothing has changed. Aboriginal people continue to have far less than the rest of us because of their treatment since European settlement. They had their lives, land, culture and identity taken away and it's not even close to being resolved. We are nowhere near equality, let alone giving them more than the rest of us.
17 percent interest rates, the demise of Australian manufacturing, the $190 b govt debt for Howard and Costello to pay off and the recession we had to have. It was a tough time.
Your facts are so wrong,youre 190 billion deficit?give me some facts about that claim.Rudds gfc stimulus was only around 50 to 60 billion to which the libs doubled in the first 12 months
You are such a pathetic old troll. Go and have a cup of tea and watch old Menzies newsreels, and be in bed by 8pm.
And compulsory superannuation, we are the wealthiest people in the world by wealth per capita thanks to him. Almost $3 trillion pooled in 2020.
The policy of raising interest rates saved our economic future. It forced Australians to stop consuming credit and driving up house prices at the same time killing our terms of trade. It forced investment into other areas of the economy and greatly improved development of new industries, and steadily reducing unemployment. Inflation would have destroyed us if this hadn't occurred.
26 years recession ever since there is a shame we had to have we haven't had it don't think it was Peter Costello Magic Touch he didn't do anything at all all he did was changed the tax system which is nothing the GST is a fucking shit tax poorly implemented hawke-keating governments salvage the verge of fucking ourselves completely we already fucked all about industry by keeping the protected for so long that they made such a shit product for such price they could not compete with international import which were a fart superior product at a fraction of the price that's why they went belly up because they were shit you know what the result of having a shithouse manufacturing sector that supplies us with all their goods is well I'll tell you it's we are poor because we can't buy anything and what we buy is shit and just you know which way to change your opinion in either event because he wouldn't let the facts get in the way would you when John Howard was treasurer and he was treasurer before Hawke & Keating took over interest rates reach 26% you intellectual rustbucket
What does free legal aid get you.. I have a story that's up to date for today
Wrong about free hold land
What a come-down having Anthony Albanese.
Paul Keating's Logic has created the precedent to potentially dismiss the constitutional title of the Nation over the Land of Australia. Australia needs a "Federal Constitutional Court" to supervise and re-balance any law or judicial decision of severe implication for the Nation or even the privatisation of Justice, but at the same time all institutional powers - Constitutional Court included as part of the Judicial Power - must be in equilibrium in between themselves.
In the formula of institutional balance we should neither forget the Crown!
In other words the existing High Court alone cannot make final decision about the "Terra Nullius" and Aboriginal entitlement of evident and/or potential detriment to the Constitution of Australia and the Sovereignty of the Nation under the terms of such constitution.
No, you're wrong
Labor gave Mabo and the 'apology' , yet still treat Aboriginals as a political tool
Labor didn't give Mabo, it was a decision of the High Court of Australia. Labor don't treat Aborigines as political tools. Labor treat them with some respect which is more than what LNP do, which is nothing
Mate you are no different to the guys in this video
The British invaded what's now known as Australia and in doing so, dispossessed the Aboriginals; Mabo was an artifice of the left to create a special class of Australians with more rights and privileges than other Australians.
Mabo wasn't an artifice of the left. It wasn't even government policy. It was a High Court decision
@@fincarosa
'a High Court decision'.. yep, an artifice of the left.
Calling someone a racist because they disagree with you is weak.
It was a little more than a “disagreement.”
Calling someone racist when they’re racist is reality mate
@@jakeisthedoctor2308 humans arent equal. thats reality mate
@@Ultimatecheezeburger Disgusting mentality.