In the scripture, Draupadi reject Karna not because he's "lowborn" but because she's set her heart on Arjun , and she only used Karna's status as an excuse to give Arjuna a chance. She also knew that Karna is way stronger than Arjuna but love is not about how strong the man is right? Draupadi has her own karma to play, and getting married to Pandava was only the starting point of that journey.
@@ayushbhatt2527 Sorry to disagree ! Karna is un killable if krishna and indra not play trick with him ... Just by his kabaj and kundal is enough powerful to defeat anyone and don't forget others are student of drona who is student of parasuram but karna is direct student of parasuram..
@@royalparagon4351 I agreed, the only reason Karna lost was because all the curses he had acquired in this life caught up with him on the same day. It was his Karma, but Karna was such a tragic hero from his birth til his death.
He fails to string the bow in KMG's version, I believe. Draupadi rejecting him appears to be artistic creativity, which is understandable, because the Mahabharata has an extremely diverse portfolio of retellings, additions, and folklore to count. I generally do dislike it as its an interpolation that does disservice to her character, but I believe a middle ground ought to be reached too. Maybe she asks naively "Did he fail to string the bow because he's a suta?"
She one of a handful of characters whom which, I feel, a tad too much artistic license was taken with when compared with the written epic the story is taken from.
Karna wasn't that bad of a guy. I wish they portrayed him a little better. Also, I'm not sure if you've seen the Disney movie, Arjun the Warrior Prince, but I think that was more of a realistic depiction of the story. The challenge Arjun had to face to win Draupadi's hand was not shooting monsters in space. I know 18 days is trying to do a different spin from the original, but veering off so much that the scifi becomes fantasy makes it a little less enjoyable for me at least.
@@nopenot1310 Yeah yeah yeah Karna tried to nuke the world I am pretty sure. Vyasa who has praised Karna so much would never have written him to be as evil as everyone says he is. Stop fooling yourselves
@@taruntac4347 you think you know Karna better than Vyasa? Karna lost to Arjuna in many 1v1 battles. He had many bad qualities. Only good thing was that he was loyal to someone, it was Duryodhana in this case. Show me verses where Karna was described with having good qualities, except friendship and the fact that he was Suryadeva's son.
Now I got it why this series is not popular. Because you changed many facts and all the characters all wrongly portrayed. Changing the mythological stories and facts is not a good idea. It looks cool but we know it is unoriginal which ruins the enjoyment.
Karn is the eldest sons among pandav and most powerful among all but the curse is the reason of his defeat and ofcourse the sharpest mind of lord Krishn
@ginger2010 -_- yo ginger fuckface,18 days is a fucking cartoon. watch the real Mahabharat with subtitles. This Cartoon is bullshit compared to real story. hell. go read its book. and if you are truly a human behind that lowlife behaviour you portrayed, you will get it.
@ginger2010 Karna's whole life was full of tragedies n sacrifices....he was blessed, strong n his skills were even better than Arjuna...such that Krishna had to cheat not once but twice in order to make Arjuna kill him.... he was even cursed by his own teacher Parasuraman that he won't be able to use is knowledge when he will need it the most....if he wasn't cursed, he could've easily killed off Arjuna with his Brahmastra despite Krishna's tricks n tactics....
@ginger2010 sexual abuser 😔 in ancient times only people from royal family use to were clothes on upper body.. when yudhishthira lost Draupadi in game she became royal queen to slave.. that's why karna told dushashan to remove her clothes from her chest.it wasn't sexual abuse..it was his way of taking revenge..
@@Harshad-lm7mw Who told you this nonsense false things? And Karna has no right to take this kind of disgusting"revenge".. He IS an abuser in original epic and FLAWED person.. But ofcourse tv series throws the woman under bus to lift a flawed male character... Distortion of history.
@@dhritidutta6231 I'm just stating facts.. you can google to read what people use to wear during Mahabharata period..it also written in Mahabharata that only royal people use wear clothes on upper body.. slaves never were clothes on upper body..that's why karna said that and pandva removed thair clothes from thair upeer body on thair own.. it's also written in Mahabharata.. please read it
Its good initiative to show this in interesting way but please this is a history, it really happens and there were no demons in war of Mahabharata, it was war between sons of two brothers. Yes there were powerful weapons but there were hardly any demons, there was one demon who was again the son of Bheema his name was ghatothkacha, he helped pandavas and died for them.
eastbackbay ya right. If you say that moon was split in half by Mohammed is true or some circus joker Jesus did something is true and believing the evidences is idiotic. RIP proofs
@@poojag5882 it is real life history. If its not, Epic of Gilgamesh isnt real either. What education are you talking about? The western christian education system? McCaulayism?
Think about it realistically, if set in a real world situation, you wouldn't exactly share your wife with 4 of your brother and be humanly happy doing it. It would be awkward as hell not to mention immoral on many levels.
Not in indian culture it whouldnt. There have been cultures, the Mongols for example, in wich one woman is expected to have at least two husbands or more depending on the size of their territory. To the indians, it was something that didnt happen very often but wasnt unheard of, not immoral.
@@ana-wp8qx on contrare brother, indians do have polyandry, in haryana, few parts of Rajasthan, Kerala, north east, there are tribes where polyandry is a normal It's nothing to be ashamed of.
Why you can't be happy? You brothers are united by one woman. Only your arrogance is the problem not being happy... If you all follow certain rules and regulations well , all can be happy.
![Eminem - Houdini [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/22tVWwmTie8/mqdefault.jpg)
In the scripture, Draupadi reject Karna not because he's "lowborn" but because she's set her heart on Arjun , and she only used Karna's status as an excuse to give Arjuna a chance. She also knew that Karna is way stronger than Arjuna but love is not about how strong the man is right? Draupadi has her own karma to play, and getting married to Pandava was only the starting point of that journey.
Way stronger ?no,equals they were in terms of potential and power. Arjuna was a better warrior,Karna was a better competitor.
@@ayushbhatt2527 Sorry to disagree ! Karna is un killable if krishna and indra not play trick with him ... Just by his kabaj and kundal is enough powerful to defeat anyone and don't forget others are student of drona who is student of parasuram but karna is direct student of parasuram..
@@royalparagon4351 I agreed, the only reason Karna lost was because all the curses he had acquired in this life caught up with him on the same day. It was his Karma, but Karna was such a tragic hero from his birth til his death.
@@royalparagon4351 and he is the eldest son of Mata Kunti
He fails to string the bow in KMG's version, I believe. Draupadi rejecting him appears to be artistic creativity, which is understandable, because the Mahabharata has an extremely diverse portfolio of retellings, additions, and folklore to count.
I generally do dislike it as its an interpolation that does disservice to her character, but I believe a middle ground ought to be reached too. Maybe she asks naively "Did he fail to string the bow because he's a suta?"
you really deserve more attention
I love this series- I do.
But the way Draupadi is portrayed doesn't sit well with me.
Why?
She one of a handful of characters whom which, I feel, a tad too much artistic license was taken with when compared with the written epic the story is taken from.
Well yeah, thats the point. They didnt want to recreate the whole thing, just give it their own spin and add to it. Mythology often has that.
Karna wasn't that bad of a guy. I wish they portrayed him a little better. Also, I'm not sure if you've seen the Disney movie, Arjun the Warrior Prince, but I think that was more of a realistic depiction of the story. The challenge Arjun had to face to win Draupadi's hand was not shooting monsters in space. I know 18 days is trying to do a different spin from the original, but veering off so much that the scifi becomes fantasy makes it a little less enjoyable for me at least.
Very true
If you had read the Mahabharata you wouldnt've said that.
@@nopenot1310 Yeah yeah yeah Karna tried to nuke the world I am pretty sure. Vyasa who has praised Karna so much would never have written him to be as evil as everyone says he is. Stop fooling yourselves
@@taruntac4347 you think you know Karna better than Vyasa? Karna lost to Arjuna in many 1v1 battles. He had many bad qualities. Only good thing was that he was loyal to someone, it was Duryodhana in this case. Show me verses where Karna was described with having good qualities, except friendship and the fact that he was Suryadeva's son.
Dude here seriously trying to compare this gem with a fucking Disney movie lol cmmon man
Now I got it why this series is not popular. Because you changed many facts and all the characters all wrongly portrayed. Changing the mythological stories and facts is not a good idea. It looks cool but we know it is unoriginal which ruins the enjoyment.
the title literally says "retold"
Wow this is how you envision an epic story!!
Wowowowo i love thissss
Making longer videos is a nice idea, it really is :)
But please post new videos also!!
Best ❤️
Awesome animation ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Please use sanskrit voiceovers with English subtitles 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
That's a nice idea...like animes🤔🤔
No karn was never able to lift the devine bow.
Make legend of hanumaan season 2 fast
This is mahabharat story not some comic book how can u change the story so much
Karn is the eldest sons among pandav and most powerful among all but the curse is the reason of his defeat and ofcourse the sharpest mind of lord Krishn
Not most powerful. Not at all.
@@dhritidutta6231 yeah but they are brothers
Sir ji tab na pura india dekhega
Karna lowborn? He was your doorway. he was stronger than all pandavas
@ginger2010 -_- yo ginger fuckface,18 days is a fucking cartoon. watch the real Mahabharat with subtitles.
This Cartoon is bullshit compared to real story. hell. go read its book. and if you are truly a human behind that lowlife behaviour you portrayed, you will get it.
@ginger2010 Karna's whole life was full of tragedies n sacrifices....he was blessed, strong n his skills were even better than Arjuna...such that Krishna had to cheat not once but twice in order to make Arjuna kill him.... he was even cursed by his own teacher Parasuraman that he won't be able to use is knowledge when he will need it the most....if he wasn't cursed, he could've easily killed off Arjuna with his Brahmastra despite Krishna's tricks n tactics....
@ginger2010 sexual abuser 😔 in ancient times only people from royal family use to were clothes on upper body.. when yudhishthira lost Draupadi in game she became royal queen to slave.. that's why karna told dushashan to remove her clothes from her chest.it wasn't sexual abuse..it was his way of taking revenge..
@@Harshad-lm7mw Who told you this nonsense false things? And Karna has no right to take this kind of disgusting"revenge".. He IS an abuser in original epic and FLAWED person.. But ofcourse tv series throws the woman under bus to lift a flawed male character... Distortion of history.
@@dhritidutta6231 I'm just stating facts.. you can google to read what people use to wear during Mahabharata period..it also written in Mahabharata that only royal people use wear clothes on upper body.. slaves never were clothes on upper body..that's why karna said that and pandva removed thair clothes from thair upeer body on thair own.. it's also written in Mahabharata.. please read it
Wow it went from to cool to lame as soon as that ridiculous song started playing
The story is correct but the graphics have been over exaggerated..... A lot. I understand though, it suits the taste of their viewers.
WHAT THE NAME OF THE SONG THE REBELLION??
Pentagram 'In My Head'
Aab hindi me v banao
start showing the war
Its good initiative to show this in interesting way but please this is a history, it really happens and there were no demons in war of Mahabharata, it was war between sons of two brothers. Yes there were powerful weapons but there were hardly any demons, there was one demon who was again the son of Bheema his name was ghatothkacha, he helped pandavas and died for them.
Such ignorance and blind faith to think the Mahabharata actually is history. Idiot.
eastbackbay ya right. If you say that moon was split in half by Mohammed is true or some circus joker Jesus did something is true and believing the evidences is idiotic. RIP proofs
@@eastbackbay if jebus is real the so is the Mahabharatham.
@@nopenot1310 Mahabharata is a poem narrated by sage vyasa to ganesha. It is an epic, not real life history.
Uneducated moron.
@@poojag5882 it is real life history. If its not, Epic of Gilgamesh isnt real either. What education are you talking about? The western christian education system? McCaulayism?
Please work on your background pop songs.
Don't play with history
Jise English nahi ati hai wo v
Think about it realistically, if set in a real world situation, you wouldn't exactly share your wife with 4 of your brother and be humanly happy doing it.
It would be awkward as hell not to mention immoral on many levels.
Not in indian culture it whouldnt. There have been cultures, the Mongols for example, in wich one woman is expected to have at least two husbands or more depending on the size of their territory. To the indians, it was something that didnt happen very often but wasnt unheard of, not immoral.
@@ana-wp8qx on contrare brother, indians do have polyandry, in haryana, few parts of Rajasthan, Kerala, north east, there are tribes where polyandry is a normal
It's nothing to be ashamed of.
Rules change from Dwarpa to Kali.
Why you can't be happy? You brothers are united by one woman. Only your arrogance is the problem not being happy... If you all follow certain rules and regulations well , all can be happy.
Nonsense complete errors wrong story
Its looseley based on mahbharata