Was a Soviet Spy Sat de orbited onto UK soil?
Vložit
- čas přidán 12. 09. 2024
- Was a Soviet spy satellite crashed onto UK soil in Dec 1980?
Winston Keech (engineer) describes the technology and the physics, that would be required to de orbit a low earth orbit satellite. Did the military unleash an unknown force of nature that injured UASF personnel in Rendlesham forest?
The UAP or Highly Strange that injured service personnel at Rendlesham was not the satellite. this story helps to explain what humans were doing...service personnel were motivated hit by a satellite. they encountered something else.
Thanks for watching.
Simon, James and John.
Get early access to advert free films and discussion forum here:
** Join Patreon FREE **
/ profsimon
Hmmm. Crashed satellites do not take off right after for a few consecutive nights.
the sat story is not the answer to the rendlesham uap....only part of it.
This is a spook channel trying to discredit the phenomena.
The sat allegedly came down on the 28th not the 26th, which was the date of the first encounter in the forest.
@@jamespworrow5394 sightings happened 26 Dec 1980 - 28 Dec 1980
Thanks professor! This seems to be a posable explanation and it Fits with other stories like Roswell, the part that a new type of radar interfered with the uap causing it to crash.
You're lifting the veil on some extremely sensitive tech. I can only imagine what they have developed since that time, thanx for the torch light you are shining on this - FASCINATING.
Much appreciated
I understood the most basic concepts; however, the rest was well above my pay grade. Thank you for this film. 43:47
One of your best videos! Bravo!!! Nailed it 🙂
Thanks! 😃
Clear as mud.
ask for clarification...its pretty simple
@@ProfSimonHolland The dates of the first sightings precede your satellite bring-down - how so?
I love pondering stories like this.
These discussions only become difficult when we think we know the definitive answers. We don’t.
I think it was Harry Stottle who said something along the lines of “It’s okay to entertain a notion without necessarily accepting it.” 😊
Excellent Simon, rendlesham is a very deep rabbit hole it seems.
Really enjoyed this one. Great work, Prof. Simon. Thanks! 👍
Glad you enjoyed it!
Wow, there's a lot to unpack here - fantastic work from everyone involved!
I'm sure you will be doing a follow up, probably many, so it would be great to have an updated, broader timeline of events that incorporates this new theory.
Absolutely fascinating watch Prof Simon. So much we don’t know out there - but with your research and contacts you are helping on the journey to “disclosure” whatever form that takes !
confirmation
Watching this as we drive to suffolk 😂
Kecksburg Incident is also a potential downed Soviet bird.
interesting
Good evening all hope everyone is well.
Heyup Proff 💥
Another great documentary. Good job team 👋🫡👍🏼
Thanks again! Fraser
this is making me angry, how on earth are certain powerful forces able to tell us such massive lies about global climate change whilst doing all this and then making us pay for it . i appreciate the well made informative video but more and more of this kind of thing is hitting me in the face and no one around me can see a connection.
Ugly part of the Mystery. Something stinks, way up high.
ionospheric heaters don't cause climate change....they have very local effects.......the answer 'STOP BURNING STUFF'
@@ProfSimonHolland the recurring global cataclysm isn't from us burning oil
Cutting edge knowledge as usual, thank you very much Professor!
I'll have dive into all this amazing research again of course, too much information and the English language is not my mother language.
I didn't understand, which night the Russian satellite might have crashed? Because the Randlesham forest incidents occurred through a couple nights, am I correct?
Maybe this tech was been used on new years eve 1979-80 when we witnessed the red orb on the North East coast and RAF fylingdales ain't that far from us being on the Yorkshire moors
Check out Malcolm Bendall's Thunderstorm Generator.
Good Morning, Prof Simon 👋. I prefer strange orbs and macroscopic phase conjugation but i'm really looking forward to this one.
Wonderful!
Evening Si on par as usual
These sound more like training exercises to see if our security was up to par ,possible that the personnel were given drugs prior to starting exercise ,like LSD and hypnosis after event,
Mr. Holland, Wow! This Rendlesham investigation you have done has been an absolute pleasure to watch. I am looking forward to what you find in the next series you are currently working on with Burroughs. It seems that there is a strong possibility that Rendlesham wasn’t off world, NHI technology as we have been led to believe.
its hard to say...lets not be distracted by the sat story....it wasnt a satellite that injured the usaf folk.
Well said
Exactly
JB "we put this together"... LOL he was just a security cop!
john experienced the incident and has worked with fine people seeking answers
OMG I didn't realise James Brown was involved. It all makes sense now.
@@robambrose4199 lol
@@robambrose4199I got a feelin he was Livin in America at the time.😉
When I saw the title I admit my heart sank. "Surely that's ridiculous", I thought. But I was amazed how plausible I found this. All the technologies involved are things NATO would be motivated to invent and test, and sound technically possible to my educated layman's ear - and they account for many of the reported phenomena at Rendlesham very neatly! And if this is only a small piece of the puzzle, the mind boggles.
Two-way time travel is a bit beyond my credibility threshold, though I'm not quite clear on what is being suggested: 'something' from the future brought back (or made visible), or 'something' that was already there (and presumably still is) that was revealed - which latter would not require any time travel to be happening. If the latter, that phenomenon is the key to all this. I'm looking forward to seeing what comes next.
@38:37 "if it weren't for you meddling kids!" -Scooby Doo
yep....ha
ive often wondered if it was the US testing out thier new stealth capabilities and the UK proved they had a way of detecting and bringing down the new stealth plane of the time.
Look at the model, which was based on eye witness reports. At the start of the Rendelsham UFO trail. Looks like a F117 to me. A then super secret US stealth plane. Crashing outside a US base. The US would get you to believe anything except was a secret plane
i think you know the answer to your question ...ha
@@ProfSimonHolland I commented on this and named a plane. But every time I post about it. Comment is deleted lol
Thanks for pulling this together. So is this proposing that some sort of portal opened (as a consequence of the advanced physics testing) and an anomalous object entered through it or was possibly impacted by a non nuclear EMP (a consequence of the testing and the natural environment).? Just trying wrap my head around this, I understand the principle of altering the trajectory of the satellite and that part seems credible.
You seriously think they would have tried to bring it down where the most nukes in Europe were being stored at the time, and when the Soviets would have been tracking the satellite too?
thats what Winston Keech is suggesting
SRI were there? Those guys. Targ and Puthoff are linked to so much cool stuff.
sri in uk were building interesting stuff
I am not sure what I am doing here
well.....you are welcome
Could this technology be used make....say a jumbo jet, dissappear? Like maybe a Malaysian airliner............
i am glad you spotted the connection...ashton forbes and i need to talk about this.
Tom Delonge says, U.S. exotic craft often appear where UAP have been detected. Human Exotic interacting with NHI exotic.
yes...good point
As usual something potentially interesting takes a spectacular nosedive into nonsense. Thanks for the video regardless.
A bit harsh I know but.. . There were two typos I saw, 'Wiston' and 'loose' for 'lose'. Worrow is an expert witness. It's a fantastic and unbelievable story: actually or figuratively is the question.
who knows...Winston's report was more about the technology that 'might' make a satellite de-orbit exercise, possible.
@@ProfSimonHolland I would like a better understanding of the technology and its accuracy that would give the authorities the confidence to deliberately bring the satellite down conveniently in a relatively populous area centred between their three specialist sites without risking exposure. 'A flying brick' is one thing. Controlling it's descent or remotely operating it is quite another. Why doesn't it burn up or get destroyed on impact landing?
Wow prof holland always a pleasure to watch your videos always learning something new 🎉 well if they got clever with all this tech they might be able to pull a plane from the sky… (mh370) just a thought 🤯😊👍🇬🇧
Thanks! 😃
❤️🔥👽🔥❤️
Any mysteries just ask Mick West he debunked himself 😭😂😭
What natural phenomenon are known in this area? I think you hinted at fairie lights before but only in passing.
serious phenomena in suffolk. i think these were deeply involved and unleashed by military physics
@@ProfSimonHolland any links we can rabbit hole or is Google our friend?
smells a lot like the Rudolph Hess trip to Scotland, eh?
i dont get it?
It's impossible to de-orbit with that level of precision.
Publish some Science to back it up.
Peace.
yeah this one is into fantasy land. They totally "de-orbited" a spy satellite into some random forest in the UK. I personally would have aimed for an Ocean but those sneaky brits love plopping space stuff in very specific forests. It's not impossible but you'd have to spend so much time and effort to safely return a spy satellite to a forest. UK tax payers... you were robbed.
I think he said we are going to examine the possibility , I didn't hear him say it actually happened............But then, im loosing my hearing and I didn't do any exams at school either lol.
Did you even watch AND listen to the video??
watch the film first......interesting science
Oh I got a comment deleted.... Clickbait is watching. 100% they pulled a soviet spy space craft into a forest. zzzz.....
Can't be satellite
the phenomena was not a satellite
@@ProfSimonHollandIs the next homework determining whether it was either a natural or a NHI phenomena?
Wow professor this video is just golden. Thank you for such an excellent video you and the team are certainly on the right track revealing the truth
Glad it was helpful!
Hope Wallis is doing well sir.
doing great ...thanks
no one asking about the binary coded ASCII to English JB's buddy "received"... what a load of BS
maybe time to look at the bigger picture
@@ProfSimonHolland the bigger picture that aliens don't use binary code ASCII to English? I'm gonna say they do not.
@@yelims20all this came out years after the incident. Like all UFO stories, such as Roswell. Stories get embellished and exaggerated
@yelims20 How do we know their language capabilities? They could have the ability to speak any single language spoken by human beings and they could definitely use binary if they have the intellectual capability to travel millions of light years from some other star system.
@@Joe-mz6dc yeah, I'll go with Occam's razor.
Come on man!
This mystery is getting bigger and bigger!
Now there's another channel presenting a video about the Japanese alien woman of the 1800's. Craft had, guess what? Same symbols? 😮
Plus most similar sightings of human like appearances have all type of craft that can barely hold 1 person. These guys must be from somewhere around here 🤔
and why are Americans so obsessed with the "grays"? What's wrong with these people? (or maybe, what's wrong with their Aether?)😮
But why would the Soviets needed to spy directly above Rendleshm?
Well, the Americans did exactly that over the Kapustin Yar. They even invented U2 for this. It was that important 🤔
Maybe both places are similar?
Simple physics tells you this is bunk.
pretty sweeping...de orbiting is a fact
@@ProfSimonHolland yip look at the haarp impact on starling launches
“Simple” physics aren’t just like “common” sense isn’t.
Your comment shows your ignorance.
By all means feel free to actually debunk the speculation/theory with physics….anyone can make throw-away statements.
It's nice spitballing by Simon but this is all it is. We all appreciate new ideas but I'm sure Halt and Fravor (1st hand witnesses) would dismiss these hypothesis immediately. When Top Gun and Nuke base commander are reporting these types of incidents then it's very difficult to take armchair researchers speculation seriously.
winston described some pretty interesting ideas on the phenomenon
Artificial timeslips
It's astounding
Andrew Pike's book was withdrawn straight after publication which is a shame because it's interesting, even thought it fails to explain the RFI in my view.
you ask Mr Pike. his advisors won't let him talk to me.
I'm trying not to be a pest. . .
A continued thought from my previous comment from the previous video....
So what I considered Foo- Fighters circling a passenger jet's fuselage, behind the wings, like a Hawaiian Lei...
⚫️Why would the 3 plasma balls circle the plane's fuselage?
⚫️As I understand at this moment, these directed beams are created from the ground, not horizontally. . .
⚫️Either the plasma balls were created by mundane operations-radar/LIDAR...
⚫️Or the jet was deliberately targeted by unknown agents.
I guess I'm trying to figure out the source of the phenomena.
I know you can make all these things small and military portable.
I just circle back to why?
Science should be able to answer this.
Even though, I cling stubbornly to my superstitious beliefs, about Foo-fighters being self aware creatures. And they looked like they popped/phased into and out of this reality.
The orbs were there to take the plane, why else do you think it disappeared in that flash / wormhole? Just a huge coincidence? lol.
Could have done without the AI narrator garbling a good many words. The two witnesses were not the most articulate and there were a good few errors in the captions. Taken together they don't inspire the greatest confidence on a topic that demands the very highest standards of non-conspiracy analysis.
Rick. let me address each of your issues. We used the A.i. voice to make it clear this was not us telling the story. it was Winston Keech. James worrow is a science researcher and not a witness. john burroughs did witness the RFI incident and was injured. He knows more that his loyalty to the USAF oath of secrecy allows him to say...i respect that. there was 1 spelling mistake in 1 caption. So your assessment is way off the mark and this was a fascinating report into the technical assets of NATO in 1980. i look forward to watching your films on the subject.
Word salad nonsense.
ask for clarification
@@ProfSimonHolland Here's a bit of the transcript - 31:55
multiplexed between many others these are time frequency and phase division
32:00
multiplexed so that they don't normally interact in a meaningful way basically
32:06
the fundamental parameters of the reality waves are used to squash as many independent reality signals into one
32:13
reality beam as possible the same techniques are used in - *part of a longer section of nonsense*
@@andymccracken4046Phil's Brother Andy? 🤔😉
thats a good description of what we are using to write these comments....multiplex ..the internet...to make a down to earth comparison
@@ProfSimonHolland Ok, thanks for that. Perhaps you can also clarify what "time frequency" is and what the unit of measurement would be. I'm also a bit confused about the "reality waves" and what their "fundamental parameters" might be.
I'm not surprised!
I got as far as you saying they where using corona satellites in 1980 and your story falls completely apart at that point sorry but this story is difficult to believe
we didnt say that...we said the usa ejected film capsules from their spy sats while the ussr landed back on earth