Ah, the most difficult song to find
I freaking love this band!
I can't believe I only just learned about these guys.
Remember the dream the l Founding Fathers envisioned and don't let any commies or fascies tear it down for this is the land of the free and home of the brave
Sadly the commie scums are trying too, I’d take Fascism over communism anyday
@@thegermanempire489 as if there were an difference between the two...
@@PedroCosta-po5nu you are being ignorant. Here is fascism The Doctrine of Fascism” (1932)
by Benito Mussolini
Like all sound political conceptions, Fascism is
action and it is thought; action in which
doctrine is immanent, and doctrine arising
from a given system of historical forces in
which it is inserted, and working on them from
within. It has therefore a form correlated to
contingencies of time and space; but it has also an
ideal content which makes it an expression of truth in
the higher region of the history of thought. There is
no way of exercising a spiritual influence in the world
as a human will dominating the will of others, unless
one has a conception both of the transient and the
specific reality on which that action is to be exercised,
and of the permanent and universal reality in which
the transient dwells and has its being. To know men
one must know man; and to know man one must be
acquainted with reality and its laws. There can be no
conception of the State which is not fundamentally a
conception of life: philosophy or intuition, system of
ideas evolving within the framework of logic or
concentrated in a vision or a faith, but always, at least
potentially, an organic conception of the world.
Thus many of the practical expressions of Fascism
such as party organization, system of education,
and discipline can only be understood when
considered in relation to its general attitude toward
life. A spiritual attitude. Fascism sees in the world
not only those superficial, material aspects
in which man appears as an individual, standing by
himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which
instinctively urges him toward a life of selfish
momentary pleasure; it sees not only the
individual but the nation and the country;
individuals and generations bound together by a
moral law, with common traditions and a mission
which suppressing the instinct for life closed in a
brief circle of pleasure, builds up a higher life,
founded on duty, a life free from the limitations of
time and space, in which the individual, by selfsacrifice, the renunciation of self-interest, by death
itself, can achieve that purely spiritual existence in
which his value as a man consists.
The conception is therefore a spiritual one, arising
from the general reaction of the century against the
materialistic positivism of the 19th century. Antipositivistic but positive; neither skeptical nor
agnostic; neither pessimistic nor supinely optimistic
as are, generally speaking, the doctrines (all
negative) which place the center of life outside man;
whereas, by the exercise of his free will, man can
and must create his own world.
Fascism wants man to be active and to engage in
action with all his energies; it wants him to be
manfully aware of the difficulties besetting him
and ready to face them. It conceives of life as a
struggle in which it behooves a man to win for himself a
really worthy place, first of all by fitting himself
(physically, morally, intellectually) to become the
implement required for winning it. As for the
individual, so for the nation, and so for mankind.
Hence the high value of culture in all its forms
(artistic, religious, scientific) and the
outstanding importance of education. Hence also
the essential value of work, by which man subjugates
nature and creates the human world (economic,
political, ethical, and intellectual).
This positive conception of life is obviously
an ethical one. It invests the whole field of
reality as well as the human activities which
master it. No action is exempt from moral
judgment; no activity can be despoiled of the
value which a moral purpose confers on
all things. Therefore life, as conceived of
by the Fascist, is serious, austere, and
religious; all its manifestations are poised in
a world sustained by moral forces and
subject to spiritual responsibilities. The
Fascist disdains an “easy” life.
The Fascist conception of life is a religious one, in
which man is viewed in his immanent relation to a
higher law, endowed with an objective will
transcending the individual and raising him to
conscious membership of a spiritual society.
“Those who perceive nothing beyond opportunistic
considerations in the religious policy of the
Fascist regime fail to realize that Fascism is not only a
system of government but also and above all a system
of thought.
In the Fascist conception of history, man is man only
by virtue of the spiritual process to which he
contributes as a member of the family, the social
group, the nation, and in function of history to which
all nations bring their contribution. Hence the great
value of tradition in records, in language, in customs, in
the rules of social life. Outside history man is a
nonentity. Fascism is therefore opposed to all
individualistic abstractions based on eighteenth
century materialism; and it is opposed to all
Jacobinistic utopias and innovations. It does not
believe in the possibility of “happiness” on earth
as conceived by the economistic literature of
the 18th century, and it therefore rejects the
theological notion that at some future time the
human family will secure a final settlement of all its
difficulties. This notion runs counter to experience
which teaches that life is in continual flux and in
process of evolution. In politics Fascism aims at
realism; in practice it desires to deal only with those
problems which are the spontaneous product of
historic conditions and which find or suggest
their own solutions. Only by entering in to the
process of reality and taking possession of the forces
at work within it, can man act on man and on nature.
Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life
stresses the importance of the State and accepts the
individual only in so far as his interests coincide
with those of the State, which stands for the
conscience and the universal, will of man as a
historic entity. It is opposed to classical liberalism
which arose as a reaction to absolutism and
exhausted its historical function when the State
became the expression of the conscience and will of
the people. Liberalism denied the State in the name
of the individual; Fascism reasserts
The rights of the State as expressing the real essence
of the individual. And if liberty is to he the attribute of
living men and not of abstract dummies invented by
individualistic liberalism, then Fascism stands for
liberty, and for the only liberty worth having, the
liberty of the State and of the individual within the
State. The Fascist conception of the State is all
embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values
can exist, much less have value. Thus understood,
Fascism, is totalitarian, and the Fascist State - a
synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values -
interprets, develops, and potentates the whole life of a
people.
No individuals or groups (political parties, cultural
associations, economic unions, social classes) outside
the State. Fascism is therefore opposed to Socialism to
which unity within the State (which amalgamates
classes into a single economic and ethical reality) is
unknown, and which sees in history nothing but the
class struggle. Fascism is likewise opposed to trade
unionism as a class weapon. But when brought
within the orbit of the State, Fascism recognizes the
real needs which gave rise to socialism and
trade unionism, giving them due weight in the guild
or corporative system in which divergent interests
are coordinated and harmonized in the unity of the
State.
Grouped according to their several interests,
individuals form classes; they form trade-unions
when organized according to their several economic
activities; but first and foremost they form the State,
which is no mere matter of numbers, the suns of the
individuals forming the majority. Fascism is
therefore opposed to that form of democracy
which equates a nation to the majority, lowering it to
the level of the largest number; but it is the purest form
of democracy if the nation be considered as it should
be from the point of view of quality rather than
quantity, as an idea, the mightiest because the
most ethical, the most coherent, the truest,
expressing itself in a people as the conscience
and will of the few, if not, indeed, of one, and
ending to express itself in the conscience and the
will of the mass, of the whole group ethnically
molded by natural and historical conditions into a
nation, advancing, as one conscience and one will,
along the self same line of development and spiritual
formation. Not a race, nor a geographically
defined region, but a people, historically
perpetuating itself; a multitude unified by an
idea and imbued with the will to live, the will to
power, self-consciousness, personality.
In so far as it is embodied in a State, this higher
personality becomes a nation. It is not the nation
which generates the State; that is an antiquated
naturalistic concept which afforded a basis for
19th century publicity in favor of national
governments. Rather is it the State which creates
the nation, conferring volition and therefore real
life on a people made aware of their moral unity.
The right to national independence does not
arise from any merely literary and idealistic form
of self-consciousness; still less from a more or
less passive and unconscious de facto situation,
but from an active, self-conscious, political will
expressing itself in action and ready to prove its
rights. It arises, in short, from the existence, at
least in fieri, of a State. Indeed, it is the State
which, as the expression of a universal ethical
will, creates the right to national independence.
A nation, as expressed in the State, is a living,
ethical entity only in so far as it is progressive.
@@sethfrisbie3957 explain in your own simple words what thou have just written, for i know it's an copy paste you got from someone else.
@@PedroCosta-po5nu economics:It uses corporatism which is an economic system that goes with giving workers a six hour workday and calls for fair treatment of workers and good conditions in exchange products are sold at a cheaper price and also allows private property.It also says if the business owner is not doing the requirements the government will have a government agent take control of the business until someone can afford to buy the business.Worker safety regulation workers will check the workplace once a week.On trade the nation will buy from nations that buy from it and sell to nations that sell to it in order to do safe export trade and won't sell or buy from nations that don't buy from it or sell to it.For jobs that go with saving lives it will be 14 and 15 hours to 24 hours and that is an exception to the 6 hour workday requirement. Workers are also given fair wages by that enough to pay for food, pay bills,student loans and care for family that means employers will have to pay their workers livable wages.The harder someone works the more they get paid and the more likely they are to get promoted.A trade limit must be made with nations for if you trade with too much nation's your nation will run out of resources but if too little your nation can’t really make money.The people can choose the job they want for as long as they can do it.
Taxes:The tax rate will be a 15% on the poor.This means they pay 15% of their income from work on taxes while the middle class pays 25% on taxes from income gained at work while the rich pay 35% of their income from work on taxes.In times of war if supplies is low than the tax rate will be increased yet when the war is over the tax rate will decrease.
The government will be a strong one for the leader can't do anything for the nation if they are not given enough power to do their job.The amount of power will be dictatorship like but they will be subject to their own law and the law itself and also won't be allowed to outlaw Christianity nor try to corrupt Christianity
Rights:Only takes away rights that are useless and are harming the nation while preserving the rest.
What the government will be investing in:1:Church and tradition,2 military and security forces ,3 agriculture but with no use of chicken fertilizer for that is ruining the soil so instead use cotton meal,4 industry,5 education,6 disaster emergency forces,7 housing improvement.
Leadership succession:The leader´s oldest son but if the son is dead before adulthood and the leader is still alive take in the daughter yet if the leader has a wife and the leader dies the wife takes control yet if the leader is not married and has no children the leader will pick on their deathbed who they see fit to rule yet if the leader is found dead and has no children and the wife is also dead or if the leader is single and dead an election will be held to pick the leader an election will be held to pick a different leader if the leader breaks the law and they will be put down but the spouse and children will not be allowed to become leader of the nation but they will live.The reason for the oldest son is to ensure succession and the only reason for elections in only those two cases is to maintain stability for elections cause instability of the nation yet even then on elections it will be decided by how many states vote for the leader but it depends on how many regions within the state vote on the leader to decide for if the majority of the regions vote on a leader than that state will be added as a vote for that leader and the states will have equal representation on that issue meaning all state votes are equal no matter what even if a state has more people than another state is the amount of states that matter when picking a leader but only in those two cases when an election is allowed.
Church and tradition will be promoted and protected by the nation and for the non-Christians they can live but they must stay quiet on the streets and in public along with work on what they must remain quiet on is attacking the Church otherwise they will have a visit by inquisitors yet they won’t be killed but instead given a Bible yet if as soon as that non-Christian tries to attack the inquisitor they will be executed but every branch of Christianity will be allowed to practice freely on what they believe except for ones that don’t follow the Trinity Doctrine.It also goes with religious and cultural unity.On ethnic groups they will assimilate overtime but not genocided against unless they keep rebelling and causing problems in the nation but spare those who are loyal and assimilate to the nations culture yet they will have equal rights just that they will be educated in the nations schools and culture and they will expected to adopt a lot of the nations culture and customs and then pass it down to their children if they have any.They will also be expected to learn the nations language.
Immigration:It will be allowed but it will have to be legal and also those who immigrate will be expected to assimilate to the nation's culture.How the immigration system would work is a guard at the check in place will search the immigrant for weapons and also have a doctor check to see if they are healthy or not and also ask if they have a skill that could help them get hired and if they do they will be accepted and will get help on finding a job and if the immigrant is not in good health the doctor that checked them will send them to a hospital to get them back to health then they can be accepted.They will also see the list of laws and punishments to help them understand the laws and punishments so they don’t break them by accident.If the immigrant has trouble speaking English they will be given an education to help them speak English from a teacher that speaks their language but has English as their native language then the immigrant can be accepted. This comes from my own form of fascism and this is not the whole thing yet I was just giving you the basics of it. It is rather a form of monarcho-fascism. I gave you the original definition from the source of the person who created it and I just shown you a part of his Manifesto on the one you said I copied and pasted.
Happy Independence Day
Enclave fans be like:
No cap this song ia effin beautiful
Perfect song for today
Coming back to it again this song again now that it is once again Independence Day!
Happy Independence Day!!!!!!!!!!
Yay a song about second best nation
@Darren Toomer havent said that rome was best i only said the USA is 6th best, any scandinavian country is single handedly better than the US
This needs to be the national anthem
Agreed
More like a second national anthem. The Star-Spangled Banner is iconic, and should never be replaced.