@@nathanlandolt5505ya estaba mayor pero el ideó el plan del bloqueo naval a toda la confederación y creo que igual el cortar a la confederación en dos tomando el control del misisipi
@@MegaWillinatorwhere I can agree they were fighting, I don't see traitors, that's like saying washington or jefferson were traitors fighting against there government (brits) The south fought for states rights, unfortunately it was thru slavery, today's states rights issue will be abortion, like civil rights was in 1950s/60s This was a war on tyranny, it helped our country grow to be the best nation in the world, we corrected our mistakes but also gave power to the gov, a republic is based on individual rights and states governing independent but united. We will see another war soon. Gov is too powerful overriding states rights issues protected by the courts rulings.
@brinkgats5938 I don't think that's accurate, when gov supercedes the people like using unelected beauricrats in gov agencies ie. Doj of fbi to go after people protesting gov regulations on curriculum in state schools u create friction by using gov agencies to censor or silence the opposition
Grant’s treatment of the Confederates after they surrender to him is a remarkable example of the kind of General who knows when to be cold and decisive in battle but the moment the enemy surrenders, to be magnanimous and gracious
Interesting Fact. The commanding Confederate General at the battle of Vicksburg was John C. Pemberton. He was NOT a southerner, but instead was a northerner from Pennsylvania who decided to fight for the South during the American Civil War. He surrendered his Confederate army to US General Ulysses S. Grant on July 4, 1863, which was US Independence Day. Later when asked why he surrendered on that day he was heard saying " I am a northern man. I knew my people. I knew I could get better terms from them on that day than any other day of the year. " Remarkable story of this Confederate Civil War General.
U.S. Grant was one of the greatest, if unsung, generals in history. He knew the ground, his men, his resources, where they were situated and where they needed to be, with almost preternatural clarity. He could glance at a map and see entire engagements unfold before a single regiment was placed or deployed. He saw what others, especially his adversaries, did not or could not, like a skilled chess player many moves ahead of his opponent. And he had the audacity of decision, knowing that indecision would doom an army as readily as anything else. It’s as if all his life he was built for commanding armies and shrewd strategizing, and without the titanic struggle of war those talents likely never would have awakened.
@@antoniocalderon3190 Let's put it into perspective: McDowell lost momentum and the chance at victory at Manassas because he stopped for lunch and kept the brigade of regulars on Matthews Hill instead of taking them across Sudley Road to Henry Hill. Mac lost at the Peninsula because he was skittish and didn't listen to his subordinates at Yorktown. Pope was a raging dick whole basically called him men losers and went on to get his ass kicked at Manassas. Mac failed to capitalize on the orders he found, even as they unfolded in front of him. He was a dick, too. Burnside was a political officer chosen because a vocal faction didn't like Joe Hooker. He refused the advice of Hancock and several other officers about where to cross the Rappahannock and lost at Fredericksburg. Joe Hooker lost his nerve at Chacellorsville. Meade won at Gettysburg but failed to follow up because his men were exhausted and it was raining buckets. He surmised the river would be too hight to cross, taking the wrong bet. If any of them had had the tenacity of Grant, his ability to see all the moving parts, and the will to do what needed doing, then yes it would have ended as early as fall of '61. At least in Virginia.
Well General Grant is finally getting the level of recognition he deserves, congress did something good finally, by approving a posthumous promotion to the rank of General of the Armies of the United States, or 6-Star General. This is rank only held by two other men, General and President George Washington, and General John J. Pershing, Commander of the American Expeditionary Forces in WWI
I’m a Southerner raised between rural Georgia and Alabama. But I like reading about the history and General Grant. A fantastic leader, that men on both sides respected. I also like how he showed respect to the Confederate General and let him keep his sidearms.
The unfortunate part is that it is the parties (uniparty) that actively seek to divide us and push us to extremes on both ends of the spectrum. We need to all come together and vote for some people who are worth a damn as human beings, instead of continuously blindly voting for whatever candidate the two main parties pull from the nearest manure pile.
@@AmandaPanda-nq1do - Sherman was Grant's "right hand man." Under his own command, Sherman "did his thing" marching through GA after capturing Atlanta.
It is the gaunt angular face. Grant had a fuller more of a heavy drinker face like but not as bad as Churchill. He drank a lot but mostly during a long siege and as he called it paying the butchers bill. Personally with a staff going over the paperwork for of his dead men.
Grant was very intelligent when it comes to the military, his armies, his generals, his soldiers, he knew men would fight if they were lead, generals lead when given a purpose, armies with purpose only need to be shown the way.
@@seththomas9105 Taylor would talk farming with the lowest private. A new staff officer during the Mexican War arrived at Taylor's HQ and asked what must have been Taylor's servant (dressed in battered straw hat) if he'd shine his boots. The servant shined the boots and another veteran officer came up and addressed the 'servant' as 'General Taylor'. The shocked officer thought he was going to get raked over the coals but instead Taylor asked for the agreed upon amount for shining the boots like it was nothing.
@@tomservo5347 Taylor was camped at my home town, Corpus Christi, waiting for Mexico to attack the United States, which they did to start the war. Fortunaty the Texas Rangers acted as scouts to lead the way to the defeat of Santa Anna's armies. But that was not the last time we had to go back there.
@@larrytischler570 He'd still be waiting then. Because they never attacked us on our own ground. The war with Mexico was an attempt at a land grab that failed because the General In Chief gave the land back to the natives. Incidentally, Taylors son in law at the time was Jefferson Finnis Davis.
My Great-Great-Great Grandfather was captured at Vicksburg. He snuck through the Union lines to join the Confederates and to find his brother who was trapped in the city. He came to find out his Brother had deserted and had snuck the other way through Union lines on his way back home! It ended up being good though. He was sent to Indiana where he was paroled. All he had to do was swear he wouldn’t go South again until the war was over. If they caught him trying they would have hanged him. So he stayed and worked in Indiana the rest of the war and married a local girl there. Once the war was over he went home with his new wife to Texas.
Yes, slavery was a key issue.....but.... When the southern states ENTERED INTO THE AGREEMENT with Northern States to create the US.....there were slaves in the north, too. Not as many, but there. And...the southern economy relied on it. When territories became states...more and more became FREE States. The agreement, that the South had entered.....was becoming oppressive...... Think on it. If you enter an agreement as an EQUAL.....but then the other side gets more power...and UNILATERALLY starts changing the terms......that is oppressive. Simple example.....you sign a 3 year lease on a property...at a fixed rate for those three years.....only open to renegotiation after 3 years. But, your landlord is brother to the mayor and such.......and it turns into you paying more or "rezoning" or such a things will happen, making it impossible for for.......is that fair...or oppressive?
It’s more complex than that, their whole economy relied on slave labor for their agriculture. Not justifying at all, just saying there was a sense of a separate culture and nationalism that was rooted in slavery.
Nobody's whole economy relies on a single thing. Most average and poor southerners felt the much larger federal government was imposing ANY law upon the Southern states that the federal government had no right to impose. The individual states acting as a group literally created the Federal government and chose to "join" said union with the understanding that they could leave "the union of states" at any time for any reason they saw fit. The Southern politicians documented that reason as slavery. The people themselves decided to fight for many reasons which may have included being able to continue their livelihood that sometimes involved the labor of slaves they didn't own, but also and more prevelantly was documented as what they felt was federal tyranny. This is widely known. Everyone knows the Victor writes the history. And the statement "rooted in slavery" is an obvious Left-Wing Extremist trope. The only things that were rooted in slavery were the slave trade itself.. and the Democrat party.
@@Anti-MAP The Southern states used the federal government to impose more rules on Northern states in the lead up to the war, especially the runaway slave act. It was not about states rights or government over reach it was about them loosing control of the government to impose their will on the rest of the country.
The union bombed Vicksburg FLAT. What was left of the humans, they were living in caves dug into the banks of the river. One report I read was from a union private stated.." it could only be thru God's grace that anyone survived the constant bombardment we suffered upon these people, They are living skeletons"
Grant used the Navy's gunboats to tear Vicksburg down in an example of brown water warfare never seen before. It was the only way he could end their resistance. To break a rock you use a hammer
At the end here the confederate soldier didn't even stand at attention for the union General to enter but then stands at attention for the confederate General. What a despicable thing to do to any General they earned the respect. Then union soldiers giving food to confederate soldiers. That's heart......
What people fail to understand, this wasnt a war of the United States fighting against a foreign army, these were two armies of Americans fighting for what direction it was to take from that moment forward.
It Is beautiful the touch of pride when the southern sergeant lets pass Grant and his staff without saluting them, whereas Pemberton enters and he pays his military respect.
@@robertolemoscustodiocust-eg1gz I apologise because I don't speak portuguese but I will try translate whether to verify if I understood well, and you will confirm or gainsay: he has respected ( the confederate sergeant) the one who effectively and really commanded him! Hierarchy and discipline is eternal till the Heaven, did I guess?
@@robertolemoscustodiocust-eg1gz very well. I speak some Spanish and watching sometimes the same movie into different languages ,I learnt some words of these languages, including Portuguese, but latter one has unfortunately remained at survival level and I recognize some words through your language sister in the Hiberic peninsula and through my newlatin mother language and of course through my ancient recollections of Latin. Goodbye
I do take issue with the disrespect shown by the Confederate sergeant. That would not have happened. And had it happened, the Confederate officers would have corrected it immediately. I love military history, and every first and second hand report I've read indicates Southern forces were always on their best behavior.
he was a surrendered soldier, he might as well lie down on the ground and go to sleep. He still had some respect for his own officers (who were also shown courtesy by Grant) so he stood. Look at the man, he is haggard, malnourished and defeated. Neither the Confederate or Union officers would bother correcting him- that's just in your headcanon
In most of our Wars we have fought because of principle not because of hatred. The soldiers taking bread out of their haversack to give to the enemy who they work so hard to starve in the first place is because there is no more reason to starve them. In most American soldiers look at the enemy and realize that could be me.
Well of course, this was brother against brother, most of the Generals knew each other, but what hurts the most is 600 to 800 thousand of my countryman Murdered each other because of race, why can't learn from history! Good luck!
Amazing how the union won Gettysburg July 3rd and Vicksburg surrendered the next day on July 4th. Fun fact the city of Vicksburg didn't celebrate the Fourth of July for 81 years after that. Worth a Google if you want.
Well, the Confederate general we see in the movie here was actually a Northerner who said he surrendered on the 4th of July because he knew his countrymen and expected to get the best possible terms from them if he surrendered on that day.
🆘️ Simply amazing 👀👀👀. Throughout American history, from the Confederates to the Nazi's, even in rebuilding Japan after WWII, the enemies of America were always treated with mercy and given grace 🙏🏿 ➡️ Unfortunately, the same has never been purported towards America's true heroes; Blck Americans and her Blck Soldiers 😢✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿❗️
The Confederate General would have been required to surrender only his sword as customary in defeat. A pistol has not attained a similar status until World War II.
I hope my Nation never has to go thru this again,we should all unite for common good and interest now despite party lines! Why is so hard to do what needs done?
In a constitutional republic, with a division of powers, the people having a voice, and a potentially multi-party system, the citizens will debate vehemently for what they believe is right, even if lives must be risked.
Grant understood industrial warfare and was unafraid to apply it. There were better strategists and tacticians perhaps, but he understood instinctively how to apply men and material on a massive scale. His techniques continue to this day.
Who was better. His relentless approach is what won the war. Lee may have been a better strategic General, but In the end, Grant whipped him good @@jelehan88
I really don't understand what made the Confederacy think they could win the Civil War? All they had were cotton fields, not a single munitions factory anywhere. When General Grant unleashed Sherman upon Georgia, it was a wrap.
was this a 1:1 rip, or did you edit it, because that awful selected edit on each person walking through the haze effect created the uglist bloom around each of them. I hope it was your doing and someone wasnt paid for that
No I am currently a non profit channel. I used 1:1 to provided a wider view for the viewers. Also you may be 1 out of 10 million viewers who commented that the editing is horrible. So I don't think I would change my editing skills based of one guy, perhaps some improvement. But my newer clips changed a bit, if you want to view and comment on those ones about their editing appearance I would consider using a different style. Thanks for the comment!
@@RealDannyHelmer respectfully, I could care less about how skilled a reposter account is at editing. My comment was a genuine question worrying if the professional hired to do real work had done the poor job in post or if you had in an attempt to show the characters better with your limited skills. The majority of people dont look at that kind of stuff, youre right, and if you are proud of your efforts to make things look "better" because you would honestly be copyright striked quicker if you didnt, then far be it for me or anyone else to sway you in either direction. Good day, and good luck.
It is not relevant to further reply to this but I will The content provided is under fair use, I haven't made a cent in this type of content. Grant miniseries is not known by a lot of people and me being the only one to post clips of Grant miniseries, brought resurgence in the miniseries, if anything I give them more views towards their miniseries. I acknowledge that my views may be radical here.
That's it, Winfield Scott is getting banned.
Do you mean Winfield Scott Hancock?
"The" Winfield Scott
@@RealDannyHelmer Why? He wasn't in the Civil War, was he?
@@nathanlandolt5505ya estaba mayor pero el ideó el plan del bloqueo naval a toda la confederación y creo que igual el cortar a la confederación en dos tomando el control del misisipi
@@nathanlandolt5505he was, but he didn’t do much
Nice detail in the end when the soldier only stands at attention when his own general walks past.
Very petty NCO
@@mag5235 not petty, they were traitors. they got what they earned
@@MegaWillinatorwhere I can agree they were fighting, I don't see traitors, that's like saying washington or jefferson were traitors fighting against there government (brits)
The south fought for states rights, unfortunately it was thru slavery, today's states rights issue will be abortion, like civil rights was in 1950s/60s
This was a war on tyranny, it helped our country grow to be the best nation in the world, we corrected our mistakes but also gave power to the gov, a republic is based on individual rights and states governing independent but united.
We will see another war soon.
Gov is too powerful overriding states rights issues protected by the courts rulings.
@@hikertrash2956there won’t be any war. People are too comfortable with their lives. Bread and circuses
@brinkgats5938 I don't think that's accurate, when gov supercedes the people like using unelected beauricrats in gov agencies ie. Doj of fbi to go after people protesting gov regulations on curriculum in state schools u create friction by using gov agencies to censor or silence the opposition
Grant’s treatment of the Confederates after they surrender to him is a remarkable example of the kind of General who knows when to be cold and decisive in battle but the moment the enemy surrenders, to be magnanimous and gracious
Interesting Fact. The commanding Confederate General at the battle of Vicksburg was John C. Pemberton. He was NOT a southerner, but instead was a northerner from Pennsylvania who decided to fight for the South during the American Civil War. He surrendered his Confederate army to US General Ulysses S. Grant on July 4, 1863, which was US Independence Day. Later when asked why he surrendered on that day he was heard saying " I am a northern man. I knew my people. I knew I could get better terms from them on that day than any other day of the year. " Remarkable story of this Confederate Civil War General.
Pemberton was a traitor
@conroytim50 I'm not saying that I liked him, just that him betraying his country for another is a remarkable story, though I may not approve of it.
Did he invent Pepsi or coca cola?
He was a racist, a coward, and treasonous. Just a pennsylvanian here.
Pemberton made a stand on the wrong side of the Big Black river. 👎
"I can not spare this man, he fights"
-Abraham Lincoln
You notice the Sgt slouched when the Union officers passed him but immediately stood straight when his own went past
Sassy southerners showing disrespect for the Alpha Dog Yankees.
@@joelmogensen579 Yes the only way they could
In his defense, he wasn't in their army.
Thats not a problem. He's not legally a soldier. He's just a rebel. So US officers wouldnt expect him to come to attention, anyway.
@@tileux He was not a rebel in the eyes of his fellow Confederates
U.S. Grant was one of the greatest, if unsung, generals in history. He knew the ground, his men, his resources, where they were situated and where they needed to be, with almost preternatural clarity. He could glance at a map and see entire engagements unfold before a single regiment was placed or deployed. He saw what others, especially his adversaries, did not or could not, like a skilled chess player many moves ahead of his opponent. And he had the audacity of decision, knowing that indecision would doom an army as readily as anything else. It’s as if all his life he was built for commanding armies and shrewd strategizing, and without the titanic struggle of war those talents likely never would have awakened.
He always had more men,
Better guns and better supply chains.
The generals before him should have won the war in two years max.
@@antoniocalderon3190 Let's put it into perspective:
McDowell lost momentum and the chance at victory at Manassas because he stopped for lunch and kept the brigade of regulars on Matthews Hill instead of taking them across Sudley Road to Henry Hill.
Mac lost at the Peninsula because he was skittish and didn't listen to his subordinates at Yorktown.
Pope was a raging dick whole basically called him men losers and went on to get his ass kicked at Manassas.
Mac failed to capitalize on the orders he found, even as they unfolded in front of him. He was a dick, too.
Burnside was a political officer chosen because a vocal faction didn't like Joe Hooker. He refused the advice of Hancock and several other officers about where to cross the Rappahannock and lost at Fredericksburg.
Joe Hooker lost his nerve at Chacellorsville.
Meade won at Gettysburg but failed to follow up because his men were exhausted and it was raining buckets. He surmised the river would be too hight to cross, taking the wrong bet.
If any of them had had the tenacity of Grant, his ability to see all the moving parts, and the will to do what needed doing, then yes it would have ended as early as fall of '61. At least in Virginia.
Well General Grant is finally getting the level of recognition he deserves, congress did something good finally, by approving a posthumous promotion to the rank of General of the Armies of the United States, or 6-Star General.
This is rank only held by two other men, General and President George Washington, and General John J. Pershing, Commander of the American Expeditionary Forces in WWI
This scene is true. It is documented in "Under Both Flags, " written stories by Union and Confederate veterans. Original books are hardback.
I’m a Southerner raised between rural Georgia and Alabama. But I like reading about the history and General Grant. A fantastic leader, that men on both sides respected. I also like how he showed respect to the Confederate General and let him keep his sidearms.
Vicksburg held out like a month after running out of food. They literally could not go on any longer. Interesting battlefield if you ever visit
It makes me sad in a way that even now, Americans hate each other over political ideals when neither party represents us in the end.
Yes, it is sad that the political issue of fucking slavery was so divisive. You're a clown.
"Those who ignore history are destined to repeat it"
The unfortunate part is that it is the parties (uniparty) that actively seek to divide us and push us to extremes on both ends of the spectrum. We need to all come together and vote for some people who are worth a damn as human beings, instead of continuously blindly voting for whatever candidate the two main parties pull from the nearest manure pile.
So True today sir
You got that right. Divide and conquer they use. The haves and have nots. No left or right. No sunni or Shiites.
Grant was the best person possible to be in charge could have been a lot worse with someone about themselves .
Sherman?
Like little Mac
@@AmandaPanda-nq1do - Sherman was Grant's "right hand man." Under his own command, Sherman "did his thing" marching through GA after capturing Atlanta.
Union never would have won without grant.
At the end of the day it was Americans fighting Americans and that should never ever happen again.
I agree
The us is nothing but an economic zone not a true nation. And I fought for it.
Amen brother.
The Democrats are doing everything they can to make it happen.
The costliest War ever fought.
I feel like this show’s Grant actor looks more like Sherman
A little
It is the gaunt angular face. Grant had a fuller more of a heavy drinker face like but not as bad as Churchill. He drank a lot but mostly during a long siege and as he called it paying the butchers bill. Personally with a staff going over the paperwork for of his dead men.
My wife and I toured the battleground and museum at Vicksburg. It was very cool to see where this siege happened!
Whats the name of this film? Looks incredible. And i love that haunting melody.
Grant was very intelligent when it comes to the military, his armies, his generals, his soldiers, he knew men would fight if they were lead, generals lead when given a purpose, armies with purpose only need to be shown the way.
General George B. McClellan had plenty of purpose, but he would not lead the Union army into combat.
Top 10 greatest General to ever live. I always visit Grants Tomb in NYC whenever I visit the city
What series is this, looks really cool
Grant miniseries
My basic training unit was the 1-13th Infantry Regiment.
Our motto “FIRST AT VICKSBURG”
A proud legacy
lol that was my unit too, what company and year were you there?
The music always gets to me
Very good Documentary.
General's always gentlemen to each other.
Fizeram West Point todos juntos e se conheciam pessoalmente!
Because at the end of the day, they are all Americans.
We
Grant emulated his hero, 'Old Rough and Ready' Zachary Taylor in his frumpy, almost seedy way of dressing-and being kind to a defeated enemy.
Taylor was the first "G.I. General" Grant was the same and so was Bradley.
@@seththomas9105 Taylor would talk farming with the lowest private. A new staff officer during the Mexican War arrived at Taylor's HQ and asked what must have been Taylor's servant (dressed in battered straw hat) if he'd shine his boots. The servant shined the boots and another veteran officer came up and addressed the 'servant' as 'General Taylor'. The shocked officer thought he was going to get raked over the coals but instead Taylor asked for the agreed upon amount for shining the boots like it was nothing.
@@tomservo5347 Taylor was camped at my home town, Corpus Christi, waiting for Mexico to attack the United States, which they did to start the war. Fortunaty the Texas Rangers acted as scouts to lead the way to the defeat of Santa Anna's armies. But that was not the last time we had to go back there.
@@larrytischler570 He'd still be waiting then. Because they never attacked us on our own ground. The war with Mexico was an attempt at a land grab that failed because the General In Chief gave the land back to the natives.
Incidentally, Taylors son in law at the time was Jefferson Finnis Davis.
I'm so proud two of my ancestors rode with General Grant in this campaign.
RIP Sgt. Harvey Foster and Sgt Cylon Brown.
The disrespect shown by the Sergeant represented would not have happened or been tolerated. The confederate officer would have corrected him openly.
Small detail, Respect even the enemy, you both are going through a hell of a time and fighting for your country
My Great-Great-Great Grandfather was captured at Vicksburg. He snuck through the Union lines to join the Confederates and to find his brother who was trapped in the city. He came to find out his Brother had deserted and had snuck the other way through Union lines on his way back home!
It ended up being good though. He was sent to Indiana where he was paroled. All he had to do was swear he wouldn’t go South again until the war was over. If they caught him trying they would have hanged him. So he stayed and worked in Indiana the rest of the war and married a local girl there. Once the war was over he went home with his new wife to Texas.
Now that's soldiering
I understood that reference!
Yes, that's Grant's style ;-)
@@alazyfrog5969 says so in the scriptures
Vicksburg is the nail that holds the Souths two halves together
President Jefferson Davis
Confederate States of America
But he was unwilling to listen to Lee and send reinforcements to try to drive out Grant.
@kellycochran6487 If he would've done that Lee would've been defeated by Burnside or Hooker
What show is this?
To think the southerners all fought the most miserable war imaginable just so some rich man could keep a slave
Doesn't pass the sniff test.
Yes, slavery was a key issue.....but....
When the southern states ENTERED INTO THE AGREEMENT with Northern States to create the US.....there were slaves in the north, too.
Not as many, but there. And...the southern economy relied on it.
When territories became states...more and more became FREE States.
The agreement, that the South had entered.....was becoming oppressive......
Think on it. If you enter an agreement as an EQUAL.....but then the other side gets more power...and UNILATERALLY starts changing the terms......that is oppressive.
Simple example.....you sign a 3 year lease on a property...at a fixed rate for those three years.....only open to renegotiation after 3 years.
But, your landlord is brother to the mayor and such.......and it turns into you paying more or "rezoning" or such a things will happen, making it impossible for for.......is that fair...or oppressive?
It’s more complex than that, their whole economy relied on slave labor for their agriculture. Not justifying at all, just saying there was a sense of a separate culture and nationalism that was rooted in slavery.
Nobody's whole economy relies on a single thing. Most average and poor southerners felt the much larger federal government was imposing ANY law upon the Southern states that the federal government had no right to impose. The individual states acting as a group literally created the Federal government and chose to "join" said union with the understanding that they could leave "the union of states" at any time for any reason they saw fit. The Southern politicians documented that reason as slavery. The people themselves decided to fight for many reasons which may have included being able to continue their livelihood that sometimes involved the labor of slaves they didn't own, but also and more prevelantly was documented as what they felt was federal tyranny. This is widely known.
Everyone knows the Victor writes the history.
And the statement "rooted in slavery" is an obvious Left-Wing Extremist trope. The only things that were rooted in slavery were the slave trade itself.. and the Democrat party.
@@Anti-MAP The Southern states used the federal government to impose more rules on Northern states in the lead up to the war, especially the runaway slave act. It was not about states rights or government over reach it was about them loosing control of the government to impose their will on the rest of the country.
"The Autobiography of Ulysses S. Grant..BEST BOOK EVER about the Civil War @
The union bombed Vicksburg FLAT. What was left of the humans, they were living in caves dug into the banks of the river. One report I read was from a union private stated.." it could only be thru God's grace that anyone survived the constant bombardment we suffered upon these people, They are living skeletons"
Grant used the Navy's gunboats to tear Vicksburg down in an example of brown water warfare never seen before. It was the only way he could end their resistance. To break a rock you use a hammer
Beautiful Violin.
A glorious day indeed
The Union treated defeated foes much better than people today understand. So much has been lost in teaching the lessons of the War Between the States.
At the end here the confederate soldier didn't even stand at attention for the union General to enter but then stands at attention for the confederate General. What a despicable thing to do to any General they earned the respect. Then union soldiers giving food to confederate soldiers. That's heart......
What people fail to understand, this wasnt a war of the United States fighting against a foreign army, these were two armies of Americans fighting for what direction it was to take from that moment forward.
It Is beautiful the touch of pride when the southern sergeant lets pass Grant and his staff without saluting them, whereas Pemberton enters and he pays his military respect.
Ele respeitou quem de fato o comandava ! Hierarquia e disciplina é eterna e tem no Céu !
@@robertolemoscustodiocust-eg1gz I apologise because I don't speak portuguese but I will try translate whether to verify if I understood well, and you will confirm or gainsay: he has respected ( the confederate sergeant) the one who effectively and really commanded him! Hierarchy and discipline is eternal till the Heaven, did I guess?
@@Faber9722 of course brother !
@@robertolemoscustodiocust-eg1gz very well. I speak some Spanish and watching sometimes the same movie into different languages ,I learnt some words of these languages, including Portuguese, but latter one has unfortunately remained at survival level and I recognize some words through your language sister in the Hiberic peninsula and through my newlatin mother language and of course through my ancient recollections of Latin. Goodbye
@@Faber9722 I understand you brother !
My Great grandfathers 2 brothers were in that battle 1 was a Sargent who was killed in battle
I jut finished watching part and during the battle of Vicksburg, and it dawned on me he kept his army supplied deep in Confederate territory
I do take issue with the disrespect shown by the Confederate sergeant. That would not have happened. And had it happened, the Confederate officers would have corrected it immediately.
I love military history, and every first and second hand report I've read indicates Southern forces were always on their best behavior.
I love the fact that Grant was indifferent.
"Always" on their best behavior? Ever heard of Andersonville?
@viking956 the commander of Andersonville was executed for his crimes.
he was a surrendered soldier, he might as well lie down on the ground and go to sleep. He still had some respect for his own officers (who were also shown courtesy by Grant) so he stood. Look at the man, he is haggard, malnourished and defeated. Neither the Confederate or Union officers would bother correcting him- that's just in your headcanon
NEVER AGAIN PEOPLE, WE CANT ALLOW RICH OLD MEN TO SACRIFICE OTHERS AGAIN FOR THEIR PERSONAL GAIN ! 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
A lot of these guys were disbanded and signed they would not pick up arms again. Many were found helping Lee at the end of the war
The North was a generous victor!
In most of our Wars we have fought because of principle not because of hatred. The soldiers taking bread out of their haversack to give to the enemy who they work so hard to starve in the first place is because there is no more reason to starve them. In most American soldiers look at the enemy and realize that could be me.
Well of course, this was brother against brother, most of the Generals knew each other, but what hurts the most is 600 to 800 thousand of my countryman Murdered each other because of race, why can't learn from history! Good luck!
Amazing how the union won Gettysburg July 3rd and Vicksburg surrendered the next day on July 4th. Fun fact the city of Vicksburg didn't celebrate the Fourth of July for 81 years after that. Worth a Google if you want.
Well, the Confederate general we see in the movie here was actually a Northerner who said he surrendered on the 4th of July because he knew his countrymen and expected to get the best possible terms from them if he surrendered on that day.
Where do u watch this
Great series
The Disrespect of the Reb Sargeant...
The Non Com at the doorway should have come to attention because you respect the rank not the uniform.
Wonder if Grant was the model used in the bridge scene in the movie "The Good the Bad, and the Ugly".
Great American Victory!
🆘️ Simply amazing 👀👀👀. Throughout American history, from the Confederates to the Nazi's, even in rebuilding Japan after WWII, the enemies of America were always treated with mercy and given grace 🙏🏿
➡️ Unfortunately, the same has never been purported towards America's true heroes; Blck Americans and her Blck Soldiers 😢✊🏿✊🏿✊🏿❗️
Okay, who knows that title of the full length movie, and where can I rent it?
The Confederate General would have been required to surrender only his sword as customary in defeat. A pistol has not attained a similar status until World War II.
I hope my Nation never has to go thru this again,we should all unite for common good and interest now despite party lines! Why is so hard to do what needs done?
Because Donald Trump would like to alter the form and function of the United States federal government?
In a constitutional republic, with a division of powers, the people having a voice, and a potentially multi-party system, the citizens will debate vehemently for what they believe is right, even if lives must be risked.
Because Democrats are lying bast**ds.
Civil war? No. But a new revolution? Yes. State and federal government is too corrupt.
special interests of certain parts of society.
What is the name of movie?
Thank you for help
Title the movie please...🙏??
This is a sad part of our history.but not taught much in school.so by the grace of God I go . hopefully not to be repeated..
What film or series is?
Grant documentary
Tour the battle fields of Vicksburg. You won’t regret it.
What movie is this from?
Grant miniseries
Which movie is this and where can I see it
Grant documentary by History on Amazon Prime Video
Where can I watch this series?
Grant miniseries on Amazon Prime Video or History Channel
Grant was the second best general of the war behind Winfield Scott.
There were many better Generals then Grant, Grant just realized what was needed to win and to recover from the winds of war.
@@jelehan88 That's why he was one of the best, if not the best.
No not from what I have read.
Grant understood industrial warfare and was unafraid to apply it. There were better strategists and tacticians perhaps, but he understood instinctively how to apply men and material on a massive scale. His techniques continue to this day.
Who was better. His relentless approach is what won the war. Lee may have been a better strategic General, but In the end, Grant whipped him good @@jelehan88
Is that a movie? What is it called?
What movie is this?
Movie?
Grant documentary
What show or movie is this?
Grant miniseries
Title please
What is this? What movie or series?
Grant miniseries by History
For once the History Channel made an actual history series.
What is this from??
Grant the mini series. I think it was on the history channel.
where can i watch this pls?
Amazon Prime, apparently.
Warum kann ich das nicht in Deutschland sehen?
I really don't understand what made the Confederacy think they could win the Civil War? All they had were cotton fields, not a single munitions factory anywhere. When General Grant unleashed Sherman upon Georgia, it was a wrap.
What is the name of this movie?
What movie/series is this from
Grant miniseries
was this a 1:1 rip, or did you edit it, because that awful selected edit on each person walking through the haze effect created the uglist bloom around each of them. I hope it was your doing and someone wasnt paid for that
No I am currently a non profit channel. I used 1:1 to provided a wider view for the viewers. Also you may be 1 out of 10 million viewers who commented that the editing is horrible. So I don't think I would change my editing skills based of one guy, perhaps some improvement. But my newer clips changed a bit, if you want to view and comment on those ones about their editing appearance I would consider using a different style. Thanks for the comment!
@@RealDannyHelmer respectfully, I could care less about how skilled a reposter account is at editing. My comment was a genuine question worrying if the professional hired to do real work had done the poor job in post or if you had in an attempt to show the characters better with your limited skills. The majority of people dont look at that kind of stuff, youre right, and if you are proud of your efforts to make things look "better" because you would honestly be copyright striked quicker if you didnt, then far be it for me or anyone else to sway you in either direction. Good day, and good luck.
It is not relevant to further reply to this but I will The content provided is under fair use, I haven't made a cent in this type of content. Grant miniseries is not known by a lot of people and me being the only one to post clips of Grant miniseries, brought resurgence in the miniseries, if anything I give them more views towards their miniseries. I acknowledge that my views may be radical here.
Thanks for the comment, what would be your suggestion to do, if I may ask?
General Grant has that glo
What is this show?
Grant the Miniseries, on the HIstory Channel
Grant miniseries. Also on Amazon Prime Video
I think America never actually healed from this war
Ues we did
I don't think the Civil War ever really ended...
Whats the movie called ?
Grant miniseries
Someone Know the Name of this Movie?
Congrats From Brasil...
Name of Film please
Grant documentary
What movie is this
Grant documentary
Name of movie,please!
Grant miniseries
Grant surrendered to his former school master when he was at westpoint...
Would you believe that there are Americans in the South today who would fight the Civil War all over again?
My g was the original backwood smoker
Name of the movie?
Grant miniseries
Name of movie?
Grant documentary
... what's called this show/movie
It is called "Grant"
Originally a series on History Channel.
Now seen on FreeVee (a free app)
Yep Grant documentary
Oh and by the way General Grant, yes, your achievements have been eclipsed by an event in Pennsylvania.
Movie name?
Grant miniseries
On Amazon Prime
Movie title?
Grant miniseries
I want to see this movie
It's a documentary or show on Amazon Prime Video, it's called Grant
It will happen again
WHATS THE NAME PLEASE SOMEONE
Grant miniseries