Digitisation as a key factor of operational superiority and troop protection. A modular and affordable solution, ready to be deployed, improving force protection and operational efficiency.
@@thepreserver83There is already a mortar carrier variant. While old, the M113 is still great as a battle ambulance, mortar carrier, command vehicle, supply vehicle, etc. it just happens to be used like an IFV by many, when it shouldn't be.
@@prfidcord7785 False advertisement, Theres also this one voice actor that is being paid by alot of games to voice for their ads, i feel like its funny that a game thats rich hired a low quality voice actor
It's not a false advertisement to me, but it appears that the background music has been used before in CnC Generals (if you are using USA). I used to play Generals and I'm pretty sure that the music has been used in that game.
I know what you mean!!! but sometimes you have to exchange amphibious capability for crew protection especially against Remote Mine, IED, Artillery, Mortar shell and also the urban warfare, these IFV need MEXAS-M or AMAP-B composite modular armor.
It's for poor countries, like Brazil, they got these IFV's. Another modernization example is the new ParaFAL project: simply putting picantinny rails, shortened barrels, and holo sights on every ParaFAL rifle
Poor country like Philippines did this because they ain't got money but the medium wage country like Indonesian paid more for the new ifv they even make one
Currently the average IFV has an armor that provides protection against 30 mm armor-piercing rounds. IFV has protection under specifications that will be easily squashed.
The problem is that infantry no more use ONLY rifles, but use RPG's, ATGM... IFV can still be used but only FULLY robotized, with full sensors and active protection all around. Otherwise - are useless.
This concept applied in the armored vehicles, can be applied in vehicles of companies of security and transport of values? ... here in our region are using ww2 tactical trains where they put the B-17 flying in formations.
A nice piece of military equipment. But careful using that thing. In wrong hands it could cause a lot of trouble and who knows who the bad guy is when every human on earth is capable of being that or rather be seens as one.
@@chibani- No there was only one user of the M113AS1 MRV and that was Australia and they were replaced by the ASLAV, which itself is now being replaced/
@@1337flite the thing is they never said specificly the name or variant of the vehicle . My guess is they're using this as a wide marketing campaign. "Send us your T72, M113,BTM and we'll upgrade it" Just like canada and peru are doing with theirs. As there's enough of these out there to justify such move
BMP2 are not upgradable. If yes, then ask Russia to do that for you, bcs they are designer or bmp2. If Russian army have not upgraded own bmp2 then why your country would?
The M113 is a piece of crap it is not worth upgrading it's an aluminium coffin. They sit out the front of some RSL's for a reason. I laughed at the one in Shepparton a real antique. Certain equipment gets to a point where upgrades are not worth the time or expenditure. 😎👎
Changing the power pack, changing the tracks, changing the turret, changing the electronics, adding add-on armor, then will remain the hull only, which is the cheapest part. For research, design and testing, is needed more money than to produce 100 brand new tanks. Then why you dont build a new design- tank?! All your claim on this video is SCAM. Old tanks maintain them how are build, to be functional, and use them to support main battle tanks on war. Design and build a brand new tank which is immune to your enemy tanks, or dont use tanks at all. Enemy will shot at least 10 ton explosive for every tank which you deploy. With "aluminum toys" from past century do not start war, otherwise you for sure will be loser.
I love this shitty animations that provide no technical information what so ever. It amounts to, put the thing in there, replace this thing with better thing, and go do the stuff in the place with the other things... with very little exaggeration. If I started name dropping actual tank components, it wouldn't be any more informative. Then there are the ridiculous test scenarios these videos make. Let me break this down and roast this for 5 minutes. So essentially, you got an old surplus M113, with an auto cannon turret on it. Some old Danish lend lease or something. You put some spaced armor on it, sure not really going to do that much for an M113. Replace the Tracks?!? I mean, I guess everybody has to replace their tracks eventually, not really an upgrade, more of regular maintenance. New tracks isn't the same as a new suspension system. Upgrade the "aiming system"... this is the dumbest part of all... What the fuck is the "Aiming system". Are we talking an AA cross hair? You mean the traverse and elevation controls on the turret? Optics? Targeting computer/ range finder? All of the above? You wanna just slap an entire package of advanced targeting computers, optics and electric turret and gun controls without any details? And this is supposed to be economical AND effective in combat? How? LITERALLY HOW?!? I love the pointless application of LSA. We have a commander's cupola, but fuck that old shit, why use your eyes when we have go-pros. What in gods name do these cameras give you that you couldn't see by just looking out the periscope? Wouldn't have trouble looking out the cupola if you hadn't bolted external sensors on the roof of the turret blocking the commander's view (and leaving your sensors open to enemy gunfire by putting them OUTSIDE the armored tank hull) Put them inside the turret's gun mantle and leave the top of the turret alone. The Blufor tracker is really the only useful addition here, and it amounts to a tough-book. wired to your optics. Done modernization complete. Fuck everything else. The spaced armor isn't going to make an M113 ATGM proof. I don't understand how military people can't tell the difference between an IFV and an APC. If they were the same thing, we wouldn't have two different classifications for the bloody things! You don't bring an armored box into CQB. Your going to get fucked in the ass, literally and metaphorically on multiple levels. And a backup camera letting you look into the eyes of the motherfucker about to panzerfaust your tank in the ass won't help! The only hope you have to survive is to screen the area with infantry. If the infantry are outside the tank, then what fucking good is the tank for protecting infantry? Oh but that autocannon. Sure, I bet the UN is going to get alot of use out of a 30mm Auto-cannon in a densely populated urban area. Can you imagine a bunch of blue helmets crashing walls down like the coolaid man, liquefying civilians at 500 RPM. They'll use the thing once, as light mortar or assault gun role, to pop windows when they run into a sniper or something scary, then get reprimanded for it later. Totally worth the money.
It’s an Australian M113 MRV, it does exist and isn’t some “Danish lend lease” and they were used for fire support in the 60-80s before we upgraded to the M113AS4
The M113 is a beautiful apc, I want it to remain operational for many decades to come, and never need to be replaced unnecessarily.
It's outdated, though. At its core its a battle taxi and little else.
Probably can be converted to be used for indirect fire, like mounting mortar or AT missiles, but are poor if are deployed in front line.
@@thepreserver83There is already a mortar carrier variant. While old, the M113 is still great as a battle ambulance, mortar carrier, command vehicle, supply vehicle, etc. it just happens to be used like an IFV by many, when it shouldn't be.
No offense but this looks like a mobile game ad
And what's the problem with that
@@prfidcord7785 False advertisement, Theres also this one voice actor that is being paid by alot of games to voice for their ads, i feel like its funny that a game thats rich hired a low quality voice actor
It's not a false advertisement to me, but it appears that the background music has been used before in CnC Generals (if you are using USA). I used to play Generals and I'm pretty sure that the music has been used in that game.
This comment aged well.
Funny , the Australian Army Put Scorpion Turrets On M113A1’s In the 70’s , they Put Some Saladin Turrets On Before That and Deployed Them To Vietnam
They where updated in 2000s longer to,🇭🇲🇭🇲
C&C Generals soundtrack?
Say what?
@@paratrooper629 its a game about some ISIS(but the ISIS on that game is more powerful)and how USA and China is going to stop it.
the global resistance army
@@deidresable GLA or Global Liberation Army.
Kinda feel resistance is more fit to today situation
That is not add on armour , they’re floatation pods for amphibious operation as the turret makes it heavier
I know what you mean!!! but sometimes you have to exchange amphibious capability for crew protection especially against Remote Mine, IED, Artillery, Mortar shell and also the urban warfare, these IFV need MEXAS-M or AMAP-B composite modular armor.
I think it’s spaced armor
bruh are you really trying to correct Thales, the maker of this upgrade package? lmao dude touch some grass 🤣🤣
I Love it when new life us breathed into old gear
it is more cost effective to buy new.... that thing is partially scrape metal
It's for poor countries, like Brazil, they got these IFV's. Another modernization example is the new ParaFAL project: simply putting picantinny rails, shortened barrels, and holo sights on every ParaFAL rifle
It is alot cheaper for upgrade if you already got that thing.
Poor country like Philippines did this because they ain't got money but the medium wage country like Indonesian paid more for the new ifv they even make one
@Dika Vinci I prefer Indonesian one it's modern tank and they made a mbt for Pacific terrain
@@tangocharliedd-2146
A tank designed for a specific terrain will always be worst than the regular tank
BAe did a great job on 400 M-113 from the Brazilian Army, I saw at Jane's.
exactly BAE was responsible for the modernization of 400 M113-B of the Brazilian army, to the M-113 BR A2 version
am i hearing, C&C General Zero Hour USA faction BGM as this video BGM ???
Yep, you heard that correctly😂👌very nostalgic
Don't forget the sound of entering in a bunker from StarCraft!
Philippines need this modernization program
We already had it
we have this i always saw this every conflict in mindanao
But it is only turret upgrade. The armor is still the same. We need that armor upgrade
@@chrysllerryu4171 in mindanao its upgraded but only the local welders just add thin layer of metal
@that saucy man 2.0 we have nothing to do with that maguindao is full of suprises you do not know when ambush will come
That was that Australian M113 that they put the 76mm gun on right?
This wad the final upgrade for our broken down worn out tracks u til we get the Land 400 Lynx or the Korean APC and the Boxers.
Currently the average IFV has an armor that provides protection against 30 mm armor-piercing rounds.
IFV has protection under specifications that will be easily squashed.
The problem is that infantry no more use ONLY rifles, but use RPG's, ATGM...
IFV can still be used but only FULLY robotized, with full sensors and active protection all around. Otherwise - are useless.
I’m peasant - ok I will go - orders construction complete - command and conquer background..
The AFP needed this
@A Perpetual Guardsman with a flashlight True but only a few units
Philippines need buy that upgrade
Well you gotta make use of the Cold War assets. New Hardware means your Vault is gonna be Vacant soon.
This concept applied in the armored vehicles, can be applied in vehicles of companies of security and transport of values? ... here in our region are using ww2 tactical trains where they put the B-17 flying in formations.
A nice piece of military equipment.
But careful using that thing. In wrong hands it could cause a lot of trouble and who knows who the bad guy is when every human on earth is capable of being that or rather be seens as one.
tell me why there is a scorpion light tank turret on the APC?
It’s an Australian M113 MRV fire support vehicle
command and conquer generals USA theme 👍😂
yea
...as long as it retains it's amphibious capability.... otherwise, it will be immobile in our country with thousands of rivers, lakes, and wetlands...
What is the turret of that M113 apc is that the tank turret from the Alvis scorpion tank?
It’s an Australian M113 MRV
So, not a single person at Thales can speak english and "sell" their products better on CZcams? Or are we supposed to guess what these sybsystems do?
Humvee here!
Starcraft and C&C sounds....
Those M113A2, M113A3, M113A4 need MEXAS-M or AMAP-B for it's hull, AMAP-M for it's belly, AMAP-R for it's hull top.
Son Tung Le
Australia or Canada indeed used MEXAS/AMAP to up-armor it's fleet of M113s instead of purchasing Bradley or some other new IFV!
@@matovicmmilan Yep I know that hehe.
@@sontungle2641 Can it stand up to 14.5mm APC rds at 500m. Level 5 protection?
@@kevinyaucheekin1319 Yeah it can level 4 protection man.
How much for the upgrades?
Where can I buy this game?
Grand daddy m113 still has it haha
This is not new the inside may be .we drove this in the mid 80s its a FSV with flotation devices on them
Command and Conquer Generals Forever :)-b
You had better appeal Turkish Aselsan to upgrade..Turkiye has been producing advanced m113 called ZMA 15-19! it will be cheaper and more advanced;)
Goverments: its not like we dont want to upgrade....we're broke....
Except they've chosen a vehicle (M113A1 MRV) that has already been decommissioned from service
Not everywhere, this is a solution for poor countries
@@chibani- No there was only one user of the M113AS1 MRV and that was Australia and they were replaced by the ASLAV, which itself is now being replaced/
@@1337flite the thing is they never said specificly the name or variant of the vehicle .
My guess is they're using this as a wide marketing campaign. "Send us your T72, M113,BTM and we'll upgrade it"
Just like canada and peru are doing with theirs.
As there's enough of these out there to justify such move
No way they used Generals theme music here
di naren masama yan. di naman kase ganun kalake budget naten sa defense at least kahit papano may pagbabago at pag upgrade
we filipinos fitted FV101 76mm turrets onto m113 apcs
Great. At least can shot, until will be shot :)
The Australians originally came up with that.
Dis cool
Songs from c&c generals.
Please gave that in the philippines that
Bruh the add on armor looks thin
ew, touch pads in combat vehicles
just slap it on a A-10 warthog and call it a day
Offer it to Indian Army with an Indian partner for upgrade of BMP2 IFV
BMP2 are not upgradable. If yes, then ask Russia to do that for you, bcs they are designer or bmp2.
If Russian army have not upgraded own bmp2 then why your country would?
Good for UN and african countries. Not for other countries.
The M113 is a piece of crap it is not worth upgrading it's an aluminium coffin.
They sit out the front of some RSL's for a reason. I laughed at the one in Shepparton a real antique.
Certain equipment gets to a point where upgrades are not worth the time or expenditure.
😎👎
Truth.
true, but in the Phil. these are very useful in urban combat and is better than nothing
Touch screen in military vehicles xD
Es un blindado M113 son muy malos carros de exploración, de combate, de cualquier tipo de operacional militar. Hay mejores. que eso.
Changing the power pack, changing the tracks, changing the turret, changing the electronics, adding add-on armor, then will remain the hull only, which is the cheapest part. For research, design and testing, is needed more money than to produce 100 brand new tanks.
Then why you dont build a new design- tank?!
All your claim on this video is SCAM.
Old tanks maintain them how are build, to be functional, and use them to support main battle tanks on war.
Design and build a brand new tank which is immune to your enemy tanks, or dont use tanks at all. Enemy will shot at least 10 ton explosive for every tank which you deploy.
With "aluminum toys" from past century do not start war, otherwise you for sure will be loser.
...the UN? To hell with the UN.
Bft trash
I love this shitty animations that provide no technical information what so ever. It amounts to, put the thing in there, replace this thing with better thing, and go do the stuff in the place with the other things... with very little exaggeration. If I started name dropping actual tank components, it wouldn't be any more informative. Then there are the ridiculous test scenarios these videos make. Let me break this down and roast this for 5 minutes.
So essentially, you got an old surplus M113, with an auto cannon turret on it. Some old Danish lend lease or something. You put some spaced armor on it, sure not really going to do that much for an M113. Replace the Tracks?!? I mean, I guess everybody has to replace their tracks eventually, not really an upgrade, more of regular maintenance. New tracks isn't the same as a new suspension system. Upgrade the "aiming system"... this is the dumbest part of all... What the fuck is the "Aiming system". Are we talking an AA cross hair? You mean the traverse and elevation controls on the turret? Optics? Targeting computer/ range finder? All of the above?
You wanna just slap an entire package of advanced targeting computers, optics and electric turret and gun controls without any details? And this is supposed to be economical AND effective in combat? How? LITERALLY HOW?!?
I love the pointless application of LSA. We have a commander's cupola, but fuck that old shit, why use your eyes when we have go-pros. What in gods name do these cameras give you that you couldn't see by just looking out the periscope? Wouldn't have trouble looking out the cupola if you hadn't bolted external sensors on the roof of the turret blocking the commander's view (and leaving your sensors open to enemy gunfire by putting them OUTSIDE the armored tank hull) Put them inside the turret's gun mantle and leave the top of the turret alone. The Blufor tracker is really the only useful addition here, and it amounts to a tough-book. wired to your optics. Done modernization complete. Fuck everything else. The spaced armor isn't going to make an M113 ATGM proof.
I don't understand how military people can't tell the difference between an IFV and an APC. If they were the same thing, we wouldn't have two different classifications for the bloody things!
You don't bring an armored box into CQB. Your going to get fucked in the ass, literally and metaphorically on multiple levels. And a backup camera letting you look into the eyes of the motherfucker about to panzerfaust your tank in the ass won't help!
The only hope you have to survive is to screen the area with infantry. If the infantry are outside the tank, then what fucking good is the tank for protecting infantry? Oh but that autocannon. Sure, I bet the UN is going to get alot of use out of a 30mm Auto-cannon in a densely populated urban area. Can you imagine a bunch of blue helmets crashing walls down like the coolaid man, liquefying civilians at 500 RPM. They'll use the thing once, as light mortar or assault gun role, to pop windows when they run into a sniper or something scary, then get reprimanded for it later.
Totally worth the money.
It’s an Australian M113 MRV, it does exist and isn’t some “Danish lend lease” and they were used for fire support in the 60-80s before we upgraded to the M113AS4