The Fate of Modern Wonka
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
- support links:
💰 PATREON @ / jacksaint
🔴 CZcams @ / @lackingsaint
👛 TIPS @ ko-fi.com/lackingsaint
Cameo by Big Joel: / @bigjoel
Second Channel: / @officalwordfromjack
Bluesky 🦋 lackingsaint.bsky.social
Instagram 📷 / lackingsaint
Twitch 🎮 / lacksaint
Discord 🗣 / discord
TikTok 🎞 / jacksaintreal
Referenced Links
Why Roald Dahl hated Gene Wilder’s Willy Wonka faroutmagazine.co.uk/roald-da...
So your kid wants to be an influencer www.vox.com/the-goods/2022/8/...
Roald Dahl Museum announces steps to address legacy of author’s racism www.museumsassociation.org/mu...
Roald Dahl Family Apologizes For Children's Author's Anti-Semitism www.npr.org/2020/12/06/943698...
Yhara zayd - hi, it's okay to audition kthxbye: • Video
0:00 Wonkian Dystopia
1:08 Old Wonka
5:20 New Wonka
8:57 Wonka, Benevolent Market Genius
14:24 Wonka The Fraud
20:16 Clickbait Wonka
24:58 Shame and Roald Dahl
30:36 The Post-Wonka Age
34:50 Outro
Tracks Featured (listed as they appear):
Building Mode 3 - The Sims OST
Pure Imagination (Just A Gent Remix)
Starman Theme But It's Elevator Music
Out of Phase - Parasite Eve OST
Mission Control - Gex 3: Deep Cover Gecko OST
The Woods of Light - Rayman 2 OST
Because I Love You - Earthbound OST
6AM - Animal Crossing Wild World OST
Wriggle Swears Room Theme - Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Game OST
Border Crossing - Wizard of Oz SNES OST
Cave 1 - Croc: Legend of the Gobbos OST
Fizzy Lifting Drink Theme - Charlie and the Chocolate Factory Game OST
Free Bird 8-bit Remix
Gate - Pokemon X & Y OST
Inspiration - Megan Wofford
Trapped in the Sewers - Experia
#wonka - Zábava
hey I forgot to mention Zoe Bee also did a great wonka video and you should watch it czcams.com/video/0jbGyLayKjE/video.html
and yes of course if they do adult wonka again the correct choice is jeremy strong
edit: because people took the bit too literally, I actually barely moderate this comments section, so have fun you animals
please help me fund my chocolate factory:
💰 PATREON @ www.patreon.com/jacksaint
🔴 CZcams @ czcams.com/channels/dQKvqmHKe_8fv4Rwe7ag9Q.htmljoin
👛 TIPS @ ko-fi.com/lackingsaint
Second Channel: www.youtube.com/@officalwordfromjack
Bluesky 🦋 lackingsaint.bsky.social
Instagram 📷 instagram.com/lackingsaint
Twitch 🎮 www.twitch.tv/lacksaint
Discord 🗣 discord.gg/pf5PXAzv8V
TikTok 🎞 www.tiktok.com/@jacksaintreal
I think the best adult Wonka would be Ryan Gosling, if the intent is to do some Gene Wilder style stuff again. Has Jeremy Strong done any extrovert parts? But I see it would work if Jeremy played the son of a totally insane Willy Wonka played by someone like Christopher Walken, and they have a weird dinamic where he wants to be the successor while Wonka announces the chocolate ticket thing to find the next CEO
Oh God I was liking the critique on the movies and Hollywood/Corporations itself but the man brought "wokeness" into it. Swear to God, people that think like this call everything woke including if they have a single gay/trans character in a sea of straight characters. The Right is out here legitimately banning Holocaust books and Black History books and saying they're woke while even Trump (who is a dick head) calls out that the word woke is being overused. Corporations do whatever they can to make money. I think the overworked and underpaid employees are a more important topic than them putting a character to satisfy a certain group. No? We have to start a stupid culture war? Awesome
Totally off actual topic but thank you so much for helping me figure out why I got all those notices (or whatever they're called) from Rutgers staff in April to my long forgotten Linkedin account associated w/long unused email account from a country I'd left 16yrs ago! ...that I didn't see until YESTERDAY when I went to clear out emails n shut it down!
....ALSO managed to notice that I somehow wasn't subscribed, but I swear I did when I found you recently 1-2 months ago (virtually everyday of my current life is the same, it blurs w/o recorded data, pathetic but true & I can't even blame it on drugs). Anyways sorted now, but wouldn't be the 1st YT unsubscribed me to someone I KNOW I was subscribed to. BASTARDS! ❤🩹
You got a subscriber. Great content.
God bless queen Zoe for making me think about Willy Wonka for the first time since I was 12 and go... wait hang on what the f-
My main issue is that they are trying to turn Willy Wonka into a protagonist. He is more like a god than a man, a morally gray force of nature. He is inherently difficult to relate to
THIS!!! He's not supposed to be someone you related to
Exactly. Charlie needs to be the viewpoint character, because he's normal and relatable. Wonka is just something that happens to him.
unless your mrbeast
I can't help but be reminded of rick and morty.
@@chickenwinnadon’t you dare insult Roald Dahl like that. What did he even do??? Why does he deserve that???
Willy wonka is meant to provoke your imagination. He’s never meant to have a backstory, he’s literally meant to be mysterious, kind of scary and very whimsical with no way of knowing where he got his ideas from. I don’t see the point of making a prequel apart from playing on nostalgia for money
Did you ever read the second book? It's the entire oompa loompa backstory
so hes like the joker basically
@@MarsheIIo such a weird comparison but you're right
Are you seriously accusing Hollywood investors of wanting to make a profit?
And purple guy
Gene wilders Wonka wasn’t just whimsical and cartoony, he portrayed wonka as an unhinged psychopath and I love it.
Even tho it wasn’t even close to how willy
wonka actually is
I saw it as a child trapped in an old body. The viciousness in my peers from 1969 well into young adulthood, it was obvious to see that children are vicious. My Mom would say stupid things like "They're just jealous." Sure, Mom.
My baby was just learning how to walk, when my sister brought her kid to my home; he was exactly 9mos older than my baby. Every time she tried to hug her cousin, he pushed her away/down...HARD. My sister and her best friend thought it was funny. Would it be funny if I did that to HIM? (Like Wonka would?)
Finally, I threw them out. He saw her trying to walk and to get balance her little hands were on the floor and that little prick FLEW from the hallway to come over and try to stomp her hands. I lifted him by the back of his jacket--hoping that I got some hair in it--and literally threw him at my sister. "Not so funny now, is it?" (Something Wonka would say, I'm sure.)
That was the last time we saw them till they were about 10yo. He was a much nicer kid by that time.
Kids are nasty. Wonka was operating on their level.
he is the superior wonka
@@theorderofthehog5984 Compared to the Book, although the 1970s film did have Fizzy Lifting Drinks (which is actually from the book), some would say the Tim Burton Wonka was more like that.
@@ovormotssetgetsiin6359sounds less like kids suck, and more like that one was being raised by your sister
We may have not got the best choice for Wonka in Timothy but we dodged a HUGE bullet by not having Ezra Miller in the role.
So did all the child actors.
That’s an understatement, Timothy is a Zionist
@@kerim.peardon5551💀 vile but true
“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.”w
I mean hes only slighty more messed up in the head than Willie Wonka
"there is no getting around this: Mr Beast is zoomer Willy Wonka" is a sentence so fundamentally true it broke my brain
Idk much about Mr Beast, but his "whimsy factor, while doing oopsies" is on point at least with the whole "mr beast burger" spiel, where he said he'd help restaurants, (which he did) but at the same time failed to properly communicate what a ghost restaurant was, and when people were getting mixed orders or the opposite of what they were asking for, with no way to track down their orders, it just kinda went under the carpet.
@@superplaylists1616 He didn't fail to communicate what a ghost restaurant is. And the failed orders is on the "partner" Mr.Beast tried working with and the actual cooks.
Do you blame the McDonald Brothers or Ray Croc when McDonald's messes up your Quarter Pounder?
Mr. Beast and Elon Musk, each one of my younger brothers heros.
@@RedrumZombiesI worked in A red robin that did Mr beast burgers. Appearantly we were one of the most accurate and best tasting beast burgers, at least from surveys... we half assed them 30% of the time if we were busy with our actual store. We got mr beast burger shirts (which were white?? Which is terrible in the kitchen.... and also I was not at work the day everyone got a shirt LMAO)
@@RedrumZombies Fair point, but I would have liked a more elaborate disclosure, like, "these are random restaurants you are ordering from, that has high chances of mixing your order, or just being mediocre, and also, since they all come from different places, sometimes the restaurant can be irresponsible and place allergenic ingredients on the burgers, without changing the burger's information, which is a crime.
Bonus is that you run a small risk of getting food poisoned from this with no way of tracking it back."
Because many people were kinda not aware of these facts? But if he said it like that, I dont think many people would have been so eager to buy mr beast burger. Its basically like ordering on burger lottery, you dont know if it comes screwed up or not, and, isnt that a fun time.
I can't get over the fact that wonka discovered the oompa loompas in the trailer. In the books, he doesn't discover the oompa loompas until he starts the company, perfects his craft, and then shuts it down for years due to spies. If he has the oompa loompas since the start, it breaks the whole timeline of the books. Him shutting down the factory and firing everyone was the main reason why people were so excited, because nobody had seen inside the factory for years. Curiosity was powerful.
As a general rule, you should expect an adaptation to change some things. This can mean rewriting the original backstory, character motivations, etc. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, because sometimes changes work really well for the kind of story the movie is going for. I'm not talking about Wonka specifically, just in general. I'll need to see more about this movie before I can form any real opinions on it.
At this stage, it has to be something else than just ignorance. Hollywood/Amazon/Apple et al are deconstructing everything and throwing out Brundlefly movies that totally miss or even invert the original work's moral payload. I say it is on purpose.
@@AngryNerdBird ok but they literally broke the whole books timeline with that, like the original book doesnt even work if his backstory was like this
i have to wonder what roald dahl would think of this. it seems disrespectful to his memory.
@@calypselle2254Good Omens 2 is a thing now. Even authors are making cash grabs through bastardised abominations of their work. Anything and everything has a dollar value attached to it : even integrity.
@@bigpauliep6992 well roald dahl cant make money off of this because hes dead... and if you watched the video you're commenting on he also criticized the adaptation of his work
Maybe a movie showing Wonka as kid friendly and idealistic would work... if it was a movie about the slow change of heart and mind into an ideal self interest, a rejection of the world that wasn't as fantastical as he wanted, and a withdrawal into his factory, where he could continue being the "dreamer of dreams."
Violet's mom: You turned my daughter into a blueberry! Now she'll never be a popular influencer!
Wonka: Are you kidding? She'll go viral! Just Google "inflation" some time and you'll see.
*Cut to the Oompa Loompa song, filmed vertically like a Tik Tok with a bunch of blushing emojis and obnoxious sounds*
The mom: But I can't have a blueberry as a daughter. How is she supposed to compete!?
Veruca: You could make her TikTok famous.
🤣
"On deviant art, She won't even have any competition"
Edit: I got curious, there's a whole Blueberry_Inflation tag 💀
That is down bad
Is most of that stuff not caused by that scene to begin with?
Honestly I find this teaser so repulsive precisely because of how sappy and whimsical it portrays Wonka himself.
Just completely removes any interesting or compelling element of the character.
The manufactured emotional music makes me physically sick.
yeah agreed. it looks visually good, but why do we need a sympathetic backstory for wonka??? it's plain stupid. he's explicitly shown to be a bad person.
See , to me is more interesting. His later self is not the same...... Interested what might have changed. What his Character Arc is from this story to the one we all know....... But most people now just like to complain that anything changed from what they are comfortable with....... has to be bad. Sad.
@@donny1960 this movie seems more interested in making him out to seem heroic and sympathetic rather than showing his downfall tho
@@the-postal-dude What "downfall"...... He becomes World Greatest Chocolate maker in original story. Again. What "this Movie" is interested in is unknown. It has not been shown yet. Prejudging is a fools game...... And even if it is great. We should not watch it because Tim did not have to audition...... ha ha. Lets find 1000000 other reasons to throw shade. World needs more of that.
i just physically can't see willy wonka as a young man. he's an eccentric crazy old man and he's always been that way. he was never an infant he just appeared in the world one day as a full adult in a tailored purple suit.
Despite Gene Wilder being the best Wonka on screen, I thought even he looked too young the first time I saw that film.
@@octochan fully agree. none of the wonka adaptations have made him old enough. he needs to have white hair and a manic, deeply wrinkly face
When the midwife reached down to catch the newborn they were greeted with a firm handshake
I could see a young Wonka if he was a very different version of the character. This new movie doesn't seem like it put real thought into how someone really turns themself into myth
You're tellng me he DIDNT come to this land with his family and start axe swinging every truffula tree he could see when he was younger?
I had a dream one night where I was going through the Wonka factory with the rotten kids, and Wonka got so fed up with how spoiled the kids were that he started actively endangering the kids. The Chocolate River Mermaids dragging a child into the river was a particularly chilling note ...
please tell me more :D
yeah tell me more too
No but why would this fit perfectly in a Wonka story? The chocolate mermaids would sing a song about how amazing living in the factory is, to abandon their parents and to play with the mermaids instead. How stupid it was that the kids had to listen to the adults and go to school, do their homework, be kind and respectful when they could just jump off the boat and run (swim) away with the funny silly chocolate mermaids. Tale of chocolate lagoons, sprinkle geysers, donut floaties and candy snorkles. A child finally breaks away from their mother’s firm grip to jump into the river, *all* of the mermaids following suit, jumping after them and dragging the child under the melted chocolate. The boat leaves the scene with the Oopma Loomas throwing nets and spears into the water, with Wonka saying “Don’t worry, they’ll catch your child soon!” Dammit.
wow. ok! that was eerie and very speficic... you should write a full story of this!@@midgematic8659
I deem the dream canon
Dahl nails it in a way: You have to take Wonka sharper. Take him to the edge. I think he under estimated the extent to which, especially for a younger audience member, Wilder brought a serious and scary aspect to Wonka. The boat scene is genuinely terrifying. The way he hits the girls, and shows no human empathy, and has this tremendous capacity for rage with Charlie at the end is vital. Timmy boy is very, very, very unlikely to bring that. He can't crawl down someone's throat with the power of his temper and strangle their soul. Wilder could.
Wonka has empathy. He just has no empathy for rotton people, which is most of them.
I really like the quote from a Tweet or something I read that said "None of the new Willy Wonka movies have understood that Gene Wilder's Wonka worked because you felt like there was a real chance he was gonna sit there and watch those kids die.""
I have not stopped thinking of this since I first read it.
He really did play that role so well.
I feel like he played it like a psychopath really would. As if he studied it.
I didn't mind the Johnny Depp version but I was a teenager at the time and it looked so strange. And it felt like he was trying too hard.
He just wasn't the right kind of person for that role.
I kind of want to see this new one. But I know that at best. It's just going to be acceptable again.
I like the first version it did give me that vibes too. The second version, it’s because it’s a Tim button style so everything is gonna be ina dark setting tbh I wish it was more of the scare factor that the first one has when it came to not giving af about the kids 😭
Correct. Dahl had that in his writings, he wanted the full cruelty on those children. And Gene's Wonka was the one who did it the best.
to be fair, Dahl hated Wilder's wonka, and as someone who rewatched the 2005 version of the movie honestly that guy also did not care if they died. He was just slightly more professional about it.
It's the same with the Johnny Depp version.
I firmly believe that Willy Wonka has to be a little insane and evil. He's the antagonist and arguably the villain for most of the story, and Charlie serves as kind of a Final Girl as Wonka slowly picks off the children while their parents watch in horror. Not that he needs to be completely irredeemable or totally evil, but just of enough to be kind of scary and unnerving whenever he's onscreen.
Not just picks them off, but in ways that still capture the dark side of the imagination to this day! 💥
Wonka does not "pick anyone off".
He warns the children not to do something, they insist on doing it, something bad (but not fatal) happens to them. Dahl had a simple moral message. "Be the good kid, or else."
@@freman007 He deliberately introduces the kids to a series of booby-traps designed specifically to appeal to . Yeah, he's terrifying.
And the remake with Johnny Depp did the best at portraying that 😌.
i wouldnt call him evil but he definetely is insane, he doesnt Try to kill anyone or be a bad person, hes just so insane that his only reaction to kids dying or being hospitalized is "oh well! i Did warn them though"
Willy Wonka is basically Jigsaw for kids. He just lets kids walk around in an unsafe candy factory, and risks their lives to teach them a lesson. And to top it all off, he has his slaves sing songs while the kids almost die
The oompa loompaa aren’t slaves lol. They WILLINGLY work for Wonka
It just makes me appreciate the Gene's performance and even Johnny Depp's performance. Although the Depp movie was very modernized in its time, it was still entertaining, and Wonka was still funny af!
Probably the best moments are when Wonka doesn't give a f*ck what happens to the kids since they're brats anyway. Its hilarious in the old movie, and its funny in Depp's too. The new Wonka makes him into a warm and kid-friendly guy which is NOT WONKA! Not in the book, OR any movies!
Ironically the 2005 version was specifically made to be as timeless as possible, even avoiding drawing trends in other media, while the 70's version made wonka sassy and snarky specifically because that was the trendy thing to do at the time and didn't fit with the actual character from the book. It was the 70's version of someone adding in marvel quips to everything
@@JimMilton-ej6zi However Roald Dahl thought gene wilder was too cheery and positive as Wonka...
All Depp needed is a goatee.
Honestly the scene where Wonka (depp) is trying to find the right key for the gate in the squirrel room gets me everytime.
Tim Cham isn’t the problem with the Wonka prequel. The Wonka prequel existing at all is the problem with the Wonka prequel. Take a character/performance that is best remembered for being an endearing/frightening enigma…. and then try to explain their backstory and how they become the person they are? Not a great plan
The Burton movie wasn't perfect, but the backstory they had in that worked very well for me, especially since Sir Christopher Lee played his father.
It's an even less interesting (somehow) Cruella
stop being mean to him he’s beautiful!!!
Really interested to see how his young black partner (shown off multiple times in the trailer) is going to react to him adopting and enslaving Oompa Loompas. Or, rather, what stupid re-write of Oompa Loompas they're going to do to make them totally Wholesome 100 and not problematic at all.
@@bugjams Waiting for them to pull a JKR. "No you see, as a race, they are COMPELLED to serve. It physically PAINS them not to be servants. What, do you want them to SUFFER?"
Nothing could ever encapsulate Willy Wonka capitalism any more than Gene Wilder saying "You get nothing. You Lose. Good day sir."
And of course "You know what happened to the kid who got everything he ever wanted? He lived happily ever after."
"You will own nothing and be happy."- the communist credo
Why don't you move down to Cuba or North Korea. Tell me how it goes.
thats actually one of my favorite lines. when he shouts it at the guys its just awesome.
@@MomeGnomeHoly shit how does that boot taste?
@@MomeGnome
Some people just can't make a critical point without pulling in their uninformed political opinions, I guess.
having watched Wonka just now, I agree that Wonka isn't a good Willy Wonka because it is only whimsical and not dark. But the version of Wonka presented in the film feels very consistent throughout the film and Timothy Chalamet is doing a fantastic job.
remember its a prequel, hes still a kid full of hopes and dreams.. theres no need to portrait his dark side, yet.
@@dhexdev7417 I suppose you could take the character that way too
@@dhexdev7417THIS. THIS IS SO TRUE!!!, idk why noone gets that!
I watched the movie.i really liked it. I always imagined that maybe wonka wasnt always so dark under his whimsy. I thought the younger wonka being so naiive and whimsy was believable. Was it groundbreaking? No. Was it enjoyable? Yes. I also didnt watch any of the promo
Agreed
I think an issue is that people are stuck on Wilder’s portrayal of Wonka as cynical and world weary, which WORKS.
But I think a younger Wonka being starry-eyed and naïve IS understandable. It wouldn’t make sense for him to be so jaded from the very start.
I think the villains’ actions were too personal for him to be so jaded yet, as they can be dismissed as a couple of bad apples at the top.
What a sequel needs is for him to really discover that human rottenness runs deeper than the people who are outright villains. He needs to learn that the problems are the systems those villains put in place and the apathetic MASSES who are willing to look the other way for their own gratification.
I think that movie would be too bleak to ever be made honestly though.
He has a moment in where he talks about “changing the world”…but when we see him older it could well be that he TRIED and FAILED.
And so he did the next best thing: retreat into a fantastical Eden of his own design where he and his subjects could make candy in peace.
And when he gives his tour of the chocolate factory he is acutely exposed to the slice of humanity that lead him to shutting himself off from it in the first place.
The fact that they’re CHILDREN makes it WORSE.
The people of the future are being raised to be like THIS???
Yeah guess it was right to give up on humanity after all.
It doesn't work because clearly in this movie he has already stolenthe Ompas Lompas cocoa but they made it seems like he was unaware. He payed off his debt like it was not such a bad thing after all, and for me its way too far from the story where he go looking for them and exploit them right after he fired all his employees.
It was a nice movie, but too far from what the character supposed to be, and this new take is actually misleading for a lot of people. Especially kids.
THIS.
I will never understand why Hollywood always has to revive decade old properties to make horrible remakes/reboots
nostalgia sells, basically a trap so parents take their kids to see the remake, disney used to just re-release the same movies in theaters after 10 years, but piracy and copyright limits made it useless, so now they remake the movies because it kinda of resets the copyright
IP renewal, brand recognition and it does gets bums in seats- it’s a sure bet and those guys in the high tower are investors not artists
Money
Because they're just so darn innovative
💰
I think that you didn't point out enough that he fired all the loval workers and then "imported" actual slaves - so he essentially outsourced the work to sweatshops :(
Even better than that. Undocumented immigrant workers.
Like the truly capitalist icon he is
Little joel and his little conspiracies riddling the minds of the young tsk tsk
He's also most likely testing his products on the Oompa Loompas. After Violet becomes a blueberry, Wonka says they always become blueberries. If not the oompa loompas who then is he testing his dangerous products on?🤔
@@theMoporterUndocumented immigrants who he houses in shantytowns, and pays in beans.
When you related it to capitalism it all made sense in my mind. Like "keep living your miserable life but hey, don't give up MAYBE someday you may win the golden ticket and your life will be better! You will be the exception!"
would love to see a movie about Charlie inhereting the factory and being so happy about it but slowly realising that Wonka was (kind of) a bad guy and how he tries to do it better
Cool sequel idea
Or charlie himself becoming evil. Snowpiercer :)
They tried to make a Tumblr Sexy Man. That's hilariously sad.
Seriously. It’s like memes, you can’t force it. It happens organically.
Lab grown tumblr sexy man
"Timmy Chardonnay is not a dilf. Put that man back in the oven until he's done" miraculan-draws, tumblr legend
What is a tumblr sexy man exactly? I've seen some examples but I'm not exactly sure yet.
@@fresanegra77 white guy with odd clothes. thats it.
they basically gave the story of charlie and the chocolate factory the greatest showman treatment. look at this successful but detached and exploitative man, but wouldnt it be cool if he was just a great guy who deserves that success?
Yes! I was thinking exactly that.
ahh yes exactly!
Perfect comparison; thank you.
Never knew willy wonka was real
The "rich successful people deserve everything! They worked hard! So they're good" story is so prevalent that I met someone in a college-level class who believed it wholeheartedly. They wrote a whole "people in power should stay in power 😊👍" essay and everything... Everyone's heard this story too often, I think.
That is what made Gene Wilder a legend: his character were always so interesting, because extreme and with lots of edges. He had this intensity that is so important in acting, he was full of contradictions, part brilliant, part completely mad, part altruistic, part complete uncaring jerk. All good characters are multi dimensional and have contradictions, it is very human quality.
Hollywood sees nothing wrong with what Willy Wonka did, so of course they’d want to make him a protagonist!
Yeah, as if Warner Brothers would make a commentary on capitalism
Gene Wilder really was the perfect casting for Willy Wonka. He makes him out like a mad magician. He's absolutely a genius, and he's a reclusive misanthrope. It's what sells the magic of the movie, he is the kind of guy who would mix his chocolate in a fanciful way like a waterfall in a room made entirely out of candy. Willy Wonka should be more than a little bit unhinged, or else none of the magic of it tracks at all. No normal person would do the things Wonka does, so Wonka cannot be normal, he can't even be SLIGHTLY unhinged, he has to be a complete madman who's very good at hiding it.
Ironically not for Roald Dahl he hated Gene Wilders portrayal.
WELL FUCKING SAID
I remember even having a bit of a crush on Wonka because traits like madness, intelligence and a sharp wit were always attractive to me, even as a kid.
@@Alex-cw3rz I mean who DIDN'T Roald Dahl hate, let's be honest?
His wife and kids, I guess?
@@drewgehringer7813 nah the articles said he hated them too
Daniel Radcliffe would have been the best choice for a new Wonka imo.
He is probably the only person who can capture the simultaneous whimsy that comes from living such a lucky life while also having this cynicism brought on by literally every person seeing you as an object, a puppet on strings that serves to make people remember happy times from childhood but is not meant to have any internal life at all.
I think he's the only person who could live up to the bar Gene Wilder set, because his passion for taking weird and unhinged roles and breathing life into them is such that he would never take on a role like Willy Wonka unless he was allowed to embrace everything that character entails.
Put simply, this version of Wonka we're getting is one Daniel Radcliffe probably wouldn't even want to portray.
That's actually a genius casting
If I had to sit down and watch a willy Wonka prequel movie I'd love for it to have Daniel Radcliffe as Wonka, maybe originally starting out as a kind saccharine bright eyed boy like Charlie, with that unhinged side present in the background. And have the movie be a downfall and rise up. With his buisness taking off but himself changed, that unhinged side taking over more and more as he continues to push and push what he can make. The whole 'success but a what cost' thing
It's funny how Daniel Radcliffe played a character that was treated as "the chosen one", thrust into fame, and expected to live up to people's expectations of ability and success; and then became that himself.
@@chuckbatmangaming Daniel Radcliffe's a great actor, but I don't see anybody else as the character but Gene. There doesn't need to be a bunch of people playing the same character - Daniel could do great playing a similar character, doesn't have to be the same or competing with Gene, he can do his own thing
Man this video just made me notice how Goslings expressions and mannerisms are actually similar to Wilder
I enjoyed the film for what it was. It is lacking that darker side to Wonka's personality, but I think at least in my mind that this is before Wonka was driven mad by being stabbed in the back by the employees he trusted and spending years alone in his factory living with that reality. This Wonka isn't a crazy old man yet, he's a young man with dreams to make the greatest factory the world has seen. Because of this he is more whimsical.
Makes total sense
Unsure if it was a joke or not, but I also thought Radcliff would better capture the Wonka energy.
So true, he has that unhinged glint in his eye.
No he would have 100% have been perfect it’s genuinely such a shame
Dude! He has only made quirky unhinged movies the last decade. What a great idea, too bad he isnt Hollywood's it boy
Omg yes. YES
I support this because Radcliffe only takes jobs that he thinks would be interesting. Chalamet apparently doesn't even have to audition for his roles 😭
Imagine some rich old investor finding out about Tumblr sexymen and excitedly bringing it up in a meeting. Then by the time they start firing out movies based entirely around the concept the entire trend is dead.
It will always be alive in my heart
@@flamingpi2245 tumblr sexymen will never truly die. honestly they might outlive tumblr itself
they would absolutely fumble it and make the opposite of a tumblr sexyman. listen tumblr sexyman is not a trend, it's a core pillar of tumblr and the experience on the website as a whole, you simply do not watch the tumblr sexymen disappear, there will always be a new sexyman to carry on the legacy of those that came before. you are not written as a tumblr sexyman, it is a fate bestowed upon you by the higher hivemind of tumblr, and that is why no corporate or writer will ever be able to knowingly and willingly write one
@@faeb.9618 if onceler is a sexyman then anyone can be a sexyman on tumblr especially timcham because he looks like a meatspace onceler
@@faeb.9618 I honestly think the only tumblr sexymen made on purpose that tumblr accepted were blackhat and alastor.
"bro cannot do whimsy" is the funniest review of the trailer
Modern Wonka does actually work, It's just he was called Willfred and the movie was Snowpiercer.
Gene Wilder absolutely killed it. He perfectly captures what Willy Wonka is about. He’s whimsical, charismatic, and fun to watch, but he’s also an insane, rage-filled slaver who’s completely apathetic toward human life. He’s exactly what you would expect when you cross a billionaire with a genius candy maker.
Apparently not according to Ronald Dahl
No he doesnt. Johnny depp played him as he was supposed to be
@@usmanazam449Gene's come closest to the books for me. Depp's was a modern take, which I did not particularly like.
Gene Wilder Wonka is best Wonka.
I SAID GOOD DAY SIR!
@@tiki_riot Gene Wilder was the ONLY Wonka. The rest are poor imitations.
Just the way Chalamet says "Quiet up and listen down... wait, strike that, reverse it" is just so goddamn labored and twee, far too precious to be something a mad genius would say.
In the first adaptation he says that exact line and in the first book he says something very similar that basically mean the same thing.
Holy crap I didn't realize what the fuck was the joke of that until I read that over and over. He needs to sound like he's making an actual mistake and have an "oops" moment but instead he delivers it like he's in Hamilton, lmfao.
@@LexyconDevil Omg yes, it's this exactly. His delivery is so off, I had no idea it was like supposed to be a speech mix-up, my brain literally didn't hear it because of how flat he says it.
it's called phoning it in
The way he’s trying SO HARD to be whimsical with his little fake smile is too distracting for me to even focus on wtf he’s saying. I love Paddington but the cutesy whimsical tone should not be applied to every British children’s book character, and DEFINITELY not Wonka, the child hating capitalist
When I read "Modern Wonka" I thought of Johnny Depp, turns out that was 13 years ago.
Lol
Wow when you put it that way I realize how compelling Wonka actually is today, in our society, as a representation of many of the billionaires we see. A man who cares more about his company than thousands of jobs/lives, who has altruistic dreams but doesn't care about any one person. This story is so so relevant. Would have loved to see them take it further that way seems like they are trying to make Wonka into the good guy. You're supposed to kinda hate him and be impressed/wowed by him. Charlie is the main character who is actually a good person, uncorrupted.
I think popular culture has already given us an excellent caricature of corporate capitalism: Max Shreck (Christopher Walken) of BATMAN RETURNS. Yes, he's technically a Tim Burton character and not a Batman character, but that doesn't make him any less compelling. In Daniel Waters's original screenplay especially, Max appears as multidimensional as a cartoon villain can possibly be. His only ambition in life is to make as much money as possible so that his family will be wealthy forever...but he's smart enough to understand that he can't be blatant in his ambitiousness. So he performs acts of virtue-signaling such as tossing free Christmas gifts to the people of Gotham City (which he reflects he's only doing because it was surplus merchandise he wouldn't have been able to sell anyway), and placing a pair of dollar bills in a Santa Claus's charity bucket for the TV news cameras to catch, making sure that the one everyone will see is a $50 bill and the one underneath is just a single. Most nefariously of all, Max wants to build a power plant so enormous that will monopolize all the electricity in the city, claiming that his only motivation is making sure that Gothamites will have all the electrical power they will ever need. Finally, he manipulates the city's political system in order the gain the leverage necessary to demand what he wants. At the same time, he's a "good guy" in that, unlike the movie's other villains, he harbors no desire for revenge and/or mass murder. Sadly, Max Shreck is at least as relevant a character now as he was in 1992. He's definitely more plausible than that other fictional energy tycoon, Montgomery Burns of "The Simpsons," who, despite being an outright crook and total misanthrope, benefits from everyone just looking the other way unless he does something REALLY heinous - and even then, he's always forgiven in the end.
I feel like Arcane did a pretty good job with their "rich inventor who talks about his dreams of helping out the poor and downtrodden with his creations, but ultimately just makes the rich richer and fails to do anything to help the poor because he's too distracted and utterly ignorant about their actual conditions" character.
Especially the part where the moment they criticized him in any way he immediately resorted to beating them with a hammer
@@arachnofiend2859 And they also nailed the "I'm from a comfortably upper-middle-class background and I had my work sponsored by an obscenely wealthy patron, but I'm going to spin that as an inspirational rags-to-riches story" part.
Arcane did do that brilliantly, come to think of it
@@serpencideugh FINE. I’ll rewatch arcane again. Sigh. How dare u make me do this definitely not out of my own free will and this was definitely not the comment that finally pushed me over the edge to do so
@@inkterp5322 omg tragic, guess I’ll have to watch it again too, out of solidarity, obviously, so sad, what a shame
Every character doesn’t need a backstory, sometimes stories are vague for a reason.
Well it depends. The movie “There will be blood.” The first 30 minutes told you everything you know about what type of man we’re dealing with. On the other hand, a origin can work if it’s pulled off like “Joker.”
@@Ishbikes that movie maybe well received but it wasnt good as a joker movie, if you pretend that was his origin it absolutely ruins the character in any version
YESSSSS!!!! The essence of folktales -- broad strokes which can be interpreted many ways.
@@Ishbikes but that was the origin of a "Joker" not "the Joker"...there's no Batman.
mystery is always more interesting
They need to accept that wonka is antagonistic. That doesn’t mean he has to be _the_ antagonist, but overall he’s not exactly a good guy. They shouldn’t be trying to paint him in this cheerful, good natured way, because that’s simply not who he is. In the original film he’s a capitalist sociopath, who doesn’t care about anybody except himself. Trying to paint him in a watered down, jolly way isn’t going to properly showcase the character.
A prequel 51 years later tho. Tell me you’re completely out of ideas without telling me you’re completely out of ideas
Ikr?
technically 59 years, no?
Any fan of Roald Dahl knows that whimsy and horror goes hand-in-hand.
Matilda was harmless if you ignore the torture box on school grounds, The Witches has a fun adventure when adult women aren't clawing a boy's mouth open to turn him into an animal. The BFG? James and the Giant Peach? Every story he's made is creepy, it teaches lessons through disturbing actions and characters. I know he rolled in his grave after that trailer came out. Nothing is more insulting to an artist than when their art is messed with
Agreed in many ways Dahl’s style of writing was mimicking the blend of horror and whimsy of original fairytales (before they got toned down and Disneyfied). Very much had the same spirit of scaring while teaching morals.
He was also a horror writer!
@@MsKnowItAll26 True, Roald Dahl books are like modern Grimms Fairytales. They reel children in with exciting premises and cute characters so much so that they don't realise they've read something morbid. Even now, I remember reading The Twits, how a married couple psychologically tormented each other daily for entertainment. On the surface? Just pranks. Under the surface? Spousal abuse that borders on torture. That's the art of Roald Dahl, to mesh two extremes, horror and whimsy, but do it so well that kids barely catch on
I would definitely argue for The Witches being on the furthest side of whimsical horror, that book is messed up
@@safabekr The Witches is on the Little Red Riding Hood level of messed up. No matter how you try and sugar coat it there’s no disguising the horror it truly is. 🤣
He’s literally a factory owner running off slave labour in the middle of a depression set around the early 1900s I would say. He’s meant to be a madman in a bleak setting, and while his factory breaks the setting, him as a person fits in there perfectly, the whimsy as a facade to hide that he’s just another factory owner.
It’s such a British story, so why every movie is American and whimsical is beyond me
Well said
@@mysteriousfigure1281Oh but bubblegum that mutate people into grotesque blueberry giants were a thing?
Two words: 'American Exceptionalism'
@@mysteriousfigure1281 I assumed the movie adaptation took place in the 1950s when the UK was still on rations and struggling financially. But that was just the impression I got when watching the movie. I don't know what the official setting was.
slave labor? Bruh the oompa loompas got paid in food, they're literally perfectly happy with the arrangement.
I saw Wonka tonight, and boy it came out of nowhere. I don't say this lightly because I was not interested in this movie at all, but I had a rare opportunity to take my family out tonight and so we did that, and went to see Wonka. I am capable of admitting when I am wrong, this film is probably one of the most enjoyable movie going experiences I've had in years. It was quite a pleasant surprise, the music and production design were wonderful and the film was truly magical. Go see it in the theatre. 10/10
Thank god, somebody actually saw the movie instead of talking it down because its too woke/not as good/its not Wilder.
Its such a good movie and I loved Wilder's version. I can't believe how resistant people are just to seeing the movie. They're missing out.
Yes absolutely! And if i am honest to myself, I actually enjoyed it more than either the Gene Wilder or Johnny Depp versions, as i have zero nostalgia for both of them. Yes, it’s not as mean or creepy, but man, it’s just an absolute heartwarming delight and one of the most enjoyable theatre experiences i had in long time.
I literally came back to this video to point out how many ppl were proved wrong lol thank u
Story was the same for me. Kinda got dragged to it, didn't want to be there. Don't like going to the movies, never liked the original movie, never saw the remake. Loved it so much I want to go see it again. Like I'm blown away that I'm Futurama "Shut up and take my money" eager to see this movie a second time in theaters when I usually hate to go to the theaters. But here we are: It somehow managed to be one of my favorite movies OF ALL TIME. And I know most people will NOT have that extreme of a reaction, but I think this movie will be remembered as a classic by the people that aren't trying to hate it off the gun.
@@figgie-puddingit’s not “wrong” if ppl like it or not it’s just personal preference
“He can’t swim”
“There’s no better time to learn”
😂
Wonka has to have that uncanny valley physique and manners that Timothe doesnt bring to life. My vote goes to Daniel radcliffe
Hear me out... Ted Danson
@@eirik5324 I could see him as wonka
@@eirik5324 nah depp already did it, enough remakes for fucks sake
Jeremy Allen white
tom holland
Knowing that Chalamet doesn’t have to audition for roles explains so much…
tbf for his more sombre dramatic roles (dune and bones and all specifically in my head) imo it's still kinda makes sense and pretty fair since he's proven himself to be capable of characters in those wavelengths, which is usually how actors then got offered roles instead of auditioning for it. wonka is just odd though, lol.
to be fair, Paul Atreides is the ultimate nepo baby
Nepo babying our way into a universe devastating jihad?? More likely than you might think
Yeah, that's a part of Paul's whole thing (along with pondering whether having a nepo baby as a messiah figure is a good thing).
Does it! Because I am under the impression that pretty much every A list actor never needs to audition
What's to say that Willy Wonka, as a person, didn't change as he got older? I think most cynical people started out life more optimistic. The film isn't even out yet.
This really feels like a re-skin of Greatest Showman to me. Very ethically dubious businessmen rewritten as being some kind of great philanthropists.
I literally met a guy once who's idea of success was being so filthy rich he could walk into a supermarket and pay for everyone's groceries without it affecting him at all, not because he wants to help people but so that people will admire him the way they admire guys like Elon Musk. It was a real challenge resisting the urge to tell him how sad and pathetic of an aspiration that was.
What makes it even sadder is the fact you can get that rich form being a janitor.
@@DownTroddedI don't think you can...
@@DownTrodded What world are you living in?
Tell that to the thousands I will be making in about a few months work I have done the math and I have people supporting me aka giving me housing food water and the ability to clean myself and my belongings it’s only a matter of time till I get my job and start paying these people back ten fold.
P.s no I am not middle class or working class I’m in the little gray zone that connects them.
incredibly sad to say that as i was reading i was like "yes yes!! that's the goal!!! that's great it's my aspiration!!!" until i got to his actual reasoning. why is it so hard to find people who want to be rich to be nice to people yall literally do not need half the extra money
If anything, wouldn't Hugh Grant make sense AS Willy Wonka? Like, he's actually around the age that Dahl clearly intended the character to be, and he's an incredibly charming guy who can absolutely pull off that sense of whimsy while also having a somewhat sinister edge. Making him an oompa-loompa is just a really strange choice, in my opinion.
I can kinda see it a little bit
That's a really great point. Modern film making has lost the most important part of being creative...it's CRAFT. Casting is a huge aspect of films that's gotten so bad it's impossible to ignore. It makes no sense anymore. Chalamet looks bad as wonka...flat and completely uninteresting. I think Jeremy Allen White from Shameless and The Bear would be PERFECT for the role of Wonka
Totally agree. Hugh is great all-rounder: charismatic, bumbling, creepy, smarmy. He could definitely pull it off.
I think that making oompah loompas British is amazing due to the context of the original.
This
just got out of the movie. it worked just fine for me.
As a child back in the 60s, I saw Willy Wonka in a theater and quite enjoyed it. But even then, I really felt conflicted about the crass commercialism and how it took advantage of the little money impoverished people had. Even though I didn't even know what those words meant. I think it made a hippie out of me.
Did you ever watch the 2005 film?
@@videon6134 The Tim Burton one? Seen some clips. Looks fun. Gonna check it out soon.
@@JasonRainbows if you read the book and were looking for something book accurate this will be your movie just saying.
@@videon6134 Gonna watch it tonite. Thanks for the recommendation.
@@JasonRainbows so how was the movie?
I feel like one of the main issues nobody addresses about the 'whimsy' aspect of the Wonka character is that, while yes, Wonka can be whimsical, his primary and most defining feature is his eccentricity. Eccentric characters stand out for how they express their emotions, not the emotions they feel. When Wonka is whimsical, he's doing it in a cheeky, almost cruel fashion, like he's in on a joke nobody else gets. Chalomet's performance is such a blasé take on the character because it removes that eccentricity entirely, turning Wonka from the somewhat twisted character he is into another carbon-copy 'informed weirdo' with absolutely nothing under the surface. It's like they wanted to make the character as appealing as possible and just gave us a hyped-up dudebro in a weird suit whose only inflections are 'loud' and 'quiet.' Wonka *should* feel a little off-putting and regularly use an unnatural range of tones and pitches in his speech. He's just that kind of guy.
Tl/dr: Wonka should be weird and Chalomet can't play eccentricity to save his life.
When I was a kid I was actually very scared of him. He's an unsafe person lol. In the books and Wilder movie
@@no_peacein the second book he gets more unhinged, I don't think I ever finished it because I got kinda upset that Charlie was being treated not great 😅 the first book all the kids that got in trouble were brats, whether you're a good or bad kid you were not safe around him, I don't think Charlie was hurt but the situations he got put it were scary
Exactly! It's in the name. Wonka should be wonky, and here he just isn't.
you've got it EXACTLY!! I'd been trying to pin down why exactly I dislike Chalamet so much (other than no-audition thing), and that's what it is. he's good for instagram photography, not for performance, and eccentric characters NEED to be made of fanfare and confetti
The thing is, anyone who's ever read Roald Dahl's adult fiction has some idea of how nasty and meanspirited he could *_really_* be. It's just when that's been diluted with the fun and whimsy of his children's literature, it makes for a very compelling tonal blend that cuts through the usual saccharine fare and made those stories so popular.
Despite how dark and often mean spirited they were I always really liked his tales of the unexpected. I do like fairly dark and grim fiction though, the tv adaptation was pretty good too.
Kiss Kiss scarred me as a teen! Gritty evil stuff! Wonderful!
I think the meanspirited-ness of his children’s books is exactly why they appealed to kids so much tbh
Love his short stories for adults. As a kid I loved all his kids novels, as a teen I was delighted to discover his adult fiction. Brilliant.
i love his adult fiction stuff. dark and inspired shit
14:03 one thing I liked about the 2005 version was the fact that they didn’t even bother making Deep Roy change his physical appearance besides making him wear some tribal outfit in this scene. It’s funny how this version didn’t skirt around it as much as the original movie
While I like the original movie, I enjoy the 2005 version alot more and I have more respect for it, it's alot more faithful to the book and makes alot of the characters actual characters. Not sure how I feel about this completely new take on Wonka though. It feels to whimsical, the book felt like an edgier Dr Seuss, this new Wonka feels like it's trying to pull in Harry Potter fans or something, that what this feels like, a Harry potter movie.
As for auditioning, it's still an important process. Alot of great actors still needed to audition for roles directors wanted them for. There is no question that they can act, the question is if they can play the role. Not all actors can fit in every role, and even if you want a certain actor in a certain role, you need to make sure if they can even pull it off, actors have limits.
a lot not alot
Rather than a prequel, I would have loved to have seen a film exploring Charlie stepping into the role of Wonka, because he's not just taking over the factory he's taking the brand and image of Wonka.
Maybe it's just me, but seeing a kid from poverty trying to take on the role of Wonka might be interesting, especially if he doesn't meet the worlds expectations of the eccentric chocolate genius. How does Charlie, after Wonka's departure, fill those shoes?
I know Willy Wonka is considered the main character by many, and he's also the more recognisable face from the franchise, but Charlie is actually the main and titular character after all.
(I haven't read the second book so idk what happens, but after the explanation I heard in this video, I wouldn't even consider using it as material for a sequel unless it wasn't for a new audience and was only for fans of the original books personally.)
The second book takes place in space. Charlie learns how to fight aliens
We already have Snowpiercer XD
There’s a reason why no one ever talks about the sequel because it really was cash grab. It’s a fun read but I couldn’t for the life of me tell you what the message is
@@t.funkthecoolmunk5472 space is cool,and don't do drugs that make you younger
This is a really interesting idea.
One thing that really bothers me about a young Wonka is that being on the older side was a fundamental part of Wonkas character, he locked himself away and fully endulged in his fantasy land for so long that he has become a man child that is only interested in his world and doesn't care at all how the otside world is doing. He is the kind of person who could help people like charlies family, but instead chose to be the person that will fire thousands of employes, likely creating mass poverty himself instead. Him beeing older is important for this. First of all it creates an obvious contrast since it is unusual for an old man to be so child like but most importantly it is important because it makes him more guilty of his own actions. As a young man, like he is in the new movie all his mistakes are alot more exusable but as an experienced entrepreneur, he should have known better, so it really highlights his apathy for his fellow humans.
It's also his fear of encroaching death that compels him to seek an heir, of course.
like all chocolate factory owners, willy wonka is a reprehensible monster who hoards the wealth he earned off the backs of slave labor like a repulsive bloated dragon while hiding the reality of his monstrous actions behind the sugary nature of his product.
There were clips circulating on TikTok from a stage production of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory that kept the songs from the Wilder film but explicitly and unambiguously depicted the unworthy children being violently killed while their parents were forced to watch; quite memorably Wonka instructs an Oompa Loompa to shoot a blow dart at the inflated Violet Beauregard after she is rolled away; there is a loud bang and splattering sound, and her father returns to stage covered in blue viscera and intestines, clutching his daughters severed leg. “She EXPLODED” he screams in horror, prompting Wonka to make a quip. “SHE EXPLODED!!” he shrieks again, spitting chunks of his daughter’s innards out, his mind utterly destroyed from the death of his child, prompting another quip. He repeats the horrifying fact again, and wonka commands an oompa loomla to fetch a shovel and bucket to scrape her remains up so he can FERMENT AND CONSUME IT AS ALCOHOL LATER.
Now there are two schools of thought about this version of the play: some find it to be closer to the original vision of the author, and i can’t disagree. Roald Dahl despised children, was racist, and delighted in portraying all but the most submissive and quietly accommodating children as worthy of suffering and death. Where I differ from this school of thought is in the presumption that if the author’s vision is accurately portrayed, the show is de facto Good.
I am of the school of thought that this production brought into sharp relief how sickeningly passively evil and unsympathetic Charlie Bucket is, as a character. Like the Germans who sat by, happy to watch their neighbors and friends shuttled to their doom to profit off their discarded possessions, Charlie watches without raising a fuss as unworthy children who dare to express their own desires are murdered. But for Charlie there is no Nuremberg, no, the little shit gets awarded the factory and becomes rich and powerful by virtue of not challenging the murder of his peers.
Now add to this the apparently delighted new york theatre crowd recounting with delight how children were brought to every performance, and left well before the end screaming and sobbing, traumatized to the point that the theatre will forever be regarded as a place to be avoided, and I find myself both approving of the revolting portrayal of wonka, and condemning the production as an outright celebration of fascist cruelty.
I will add that since any sense of satire was apparently lost on the audience as a whole, I will not entertain any defense of it on those grounds. Satire of fascism that is only recognizable to the already antifascist is worthless, and usually functions as especially insidious propaganda, as it delights and affirms the fascists while making those who claim to oppose fascism believe that it is not only secretly on their side, but that they are cleverer and more worthy for knowing that the explicitly enthusiastic advertisement for fascism is actually (very quietly) mocking fascists.
“How do they not understand that it’s SATIRE” they’ll snark, as a handsome and badass character gets everything they want and all opposition is killed while whining effeminately. How indeed.
Tl;dr wonka is trash, dahl is trash, that violent broadway revival that existed to horrify children and delight nasty theater millennials is trash, you are probably trash and so am i. get runned over by an chevy everybdoy
this sounds oddly familiar..
UPD: lol,in the seconds after i read this comment and write mine, this moment of the video appeared 15:04
THIS THIS THIS IIIIII CAN'T STAND ITTT
...well that was a roller coaster@@chexfan2000
Love the commentary on the nuances of the original story, its archetypes and symbolism in Wonka. I'm not sure the vast majority can appreciate that anymore. We've become the parody, the spectacle itself.
Spoiler: it worked.
I feel sorry for Timothy. You can tell he wants to a good job in the role and he's bringing his own style to it, but it's doomed to fail
Why would you feel sorry for him? He accepted the role.
@@ReaperspearX i dont think its easy to get iconic roles.
Also, i think he dosn´t just "get it", he properly went to a bunch of auditions
@@nyengsternope, he infamously does NOT do auditions anymore.
@@nyengster It's actually easy for him, Timothee is a nepo baby.
@@bobbyb2749 oh okay, i know nothing about hollywood then :D
I tought all actors was struggeling to get roles at this point
I love that you called out Grandpa Joe. 😂😂😂 that's the main complaint my husband has about the entire movie. The fact that old Joe can't get up and work but the second we land a trip to the chocolate factory, homeboy is ankle clacking and shit 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂.
"Grandpa Joe Hate" is a whole subreddit for a reason. Talkin' 'bout "I" got a golden ticket. Bitch, Charlie got the ticket. Then he coaxes him into breaking the rules, then tries to get him to sell Wonka's secrets...Piece of shit.
😂
When we were kids, we assumed that Grandpa Joe was full of shit and got up on the sly when everyone was asleep. It fits with him being an ass in the Fizzy Lifting Drinks tank. We were mad at him for that.
It's supposed to be a story about hope. He doesn't get out of bed for 20 years because he has no reason to. He has lost all hope. The Golden Ticket inspires and revives him.
@@booksteer7057 Candy is dandy but liquor is quicker.
I read the sequel growing up. It was very strange. Space Hotel USA! And... avocado-shaped alien things? Weird.
if not for the fact that you didn't watch the movie before coming to these conclusions it might've been an interesting video
My problem with Chalamet’s portrayal (yes we only have a trailer but I’m going off that for now) is that he’s TRYING to be whimsical. Gene Wilder WAS whimsical. That’s the difference. Chalamet is trying, wilder just was, he embodied it. He didn’t need to try, it seemed to come so naturally to him.
And I like chalamet I think he’s a good actor, I just don’t think he was the correct casting based on what we’ve seen so far.
Gene Wilder was also completely unhinged. He was like "give me a cane, I'm going to act like I have a limp and then fall down, but actually I'm just pretending. Don't tell the children"
I think that's the main issue with any new take on it - nobody has that whimsy anymore. Relatively few have imagination, and the ones that do tend to go darker (and my own writing is no exception). I don't think we're in a place in culture or history where one can have whimsy or any positive outlook towards the future that's not based solely on a power or success angle, and that in itself is depressing. Having that fact pointed out blatantly in reinterpretations such as this just makes it that much worse and adds to that cultural mental drain.
@@genericname2747 You classify that behavior as unhinged? Huh? Gene was establishing Wonka as he saw him. Being underhanded in a silly, almost devilish way, is TOTALLY Wonka. Tim is a fkboi thirst trap that girls obsess over because they are shallow. That's why he's in the role to begin with. They know he has a cult following that will watch anything he's in. They don't care about narrative or him actually doing an awesome job. They just want people in theater seats.
The problem for me is that it looks like he's not even trying. Like it's so obvious he is cynical about it... I could be wrong
@@TwilightRogue15
Yet ironically we live much better today than we did when Wilder made Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
Personally I always saw Wonka in a similar vain to how I saw Yubaba the bathhouse owner from Spirited away. Although Yubaba is a lot more crotchety. They’re both antagonists who are not to be defeated necessarily but to be overcome. They're pragmatic, callous business owners. They’re magical tricksters who won’t think twice about crushing anyone who would harm what’s theirs but at the very least will stick to the bargain made with the protagonists. They’re not punished at the end for their actions but you don’t really care that they are anyway because you recognize that they're at least fair (Not to their workers but to the protagonists)
Oooh, excellent comparison. Yubaba, like Wonka, wasn't necessarily the "bad guy" just the entrepreneur and business owner. Hardline, not heartless, but selfish I think. Ghibli does their antagonists so very well in that regard.
Perfect comparison, i love this perspective!
The movie was actually fire fr XD
At the same time I think Willy Wonka's fall was caused not only by his detachement but also by even worse capitalists. People who had no artistic vision but knew how to communicate with people to get what they want - monopolize market so that they can give people lesser quality goods and still get their gratitude. It could be a story how monopoly kills creative minds that don't have as much creative skills that cannot balance social life with creative process
You perfectly described why this movie trailer made me cringe so much. It feels like a different movie completely. It’s like he’s playing a man who stole Willy Wonka’s name and outfit. And you’re right, he’s meant to be unsettling, whimsical, and untrustworthy. I don’t foresee that happening in this film.
It's too twee and sappy. It's like this Timothee guy was told to cosplay a tumblr sexyman version of Wonka, it's bizarre.
@@miscelaneasdealguemWhat an insult to tumblr sexymen😢 They better than this
Oh yeah, so cringy and sappy. Also, Willy Wonka was note about Wonka, but about the children, it is a children story after all, showing all the different children and from which families they came. This is basically just recycling the Wonka name and chocolate making, the original story gets destroyed, nothing of the brilliance of Dahl is left. It feels empty and meaningless. I'm very sure it will fail because of it, because if there is one thing that makes more movie reboots fail today it is "NOT STICKING TO THE SOURCE MATERIAL" to adapt it to "MODERN AUDIENCES", so you basically destroy the essence of it. How absurd that is can be illustrated by doing a remake of the second world war, where of course Hitler is now a woman and the Nazis don't kill people, but just fight in online forums and outrage culture is now what the war used to be. Dear Hollywood producers: Stick to the good story that you are basing your completely unoriginal reboot on please! Because you can't write, we know that, you can't create original and interesting characters, we know that. You have to recycle, because you can't make an original interesting movie to begin with. So just stick to a good story without changing everything about it and you will make a decent good movie. But few listen, few even seem to know good from bad anymore. The audiences can though and that is why more movies fail today than ever before.
@@xcenex479No they ain’t, I remember when the oncler fandom happened, this version of wonka is just gonna be that. 😂
@@Jack_Flapper Not in that fandom, so can’t speak to that. But Sans didn’t win the tumblr sexyman contest to be compared to a Willy Wonka wannabe🫠
Gene Wilder just _got_ the character like nobody else really ever has, and the fact that the whole movie was shot like a documentary makes the whole classic movie feel like you're just capturing snippets of him going about his daily life.
Honestly Depo did pretty well too imo, made him seem a bit more out there/crazy while still being whimsical and a bit sinister. Wilder has more subtlety though
By the authors own words Wilder did not get the character. And it’s wildly known that the film not being like the original work is why we will never get adaptations of the sequels.
@@mrbubbles6468 Dahl's vision of Wonka is a Purple Suited Sociopath with an army of Unwillingly Indentured Pigmies gleefully disfiguring children.
It really does not lend itself well to the silver screen...
@@Ebonheart2319 To be fair that sounds like it would certainly be interesting at the very least lol
Thats just your nostalgia bias lol
As a child the movie gave me nightmares.
As an adult I don't think the social commentary was nearly pointed enough.
The callousness you see in Wonka is Roald Dahl's, and you can see it in all his children's works in the form of contemptuous neglect and disproportionate retribution. So in that regard, it is accurate. And his popularity with children indicates their own cruelty to each other, though I doubt Dahl's books would pass editors today, kids genuinely love tales of mistreatment to other children.
There’s a great episode of the Dead Authors podcast where Ben Schwartz plays Dahl. Over the course of the episode, the host starts inquiring about Dahl’s antisemitic writing and Ben Schwartz learns, in real time, that Dahl was a bigot. It’s wild and sad and fun all at the same time.
bonus dark irony because Ben is Jewish
Ben Schwartz is Jewish?!
Holy shit 🤯
@@tai9705 Culturally or practicing?
Because we sort of guessed the cultural aspect from the name.
@@Naedlus Jewish is an ethnicity, Judaism is the associated ethnic religion of that ethnic group. Historically, most religions are ethnic religions, they are tied to a people group, the big ones instead give that up in exchange for growth by making threats about the fates of non-believers. Judaism has no such threats for non-believers, unlike, say Christianity. In Judaism there is no "final judgement" of non-believers where they are tortured for all eternity.
I spent like 6 months learning how to do that Wonka tuck-and-roll move; it's actually quite a bit harder than it looks (because you have to tuck and start the roll scarily late).
I've never had a chance to use it yet, but I don't regret it one bit.
Well, when Wilder did it, no one knew he was gonna do it. He did it to keep his fellow castmates on their toes. So, you need to make sure no one expects you to do it in order to achieve the same effect.
like in a graduation, or in a marriage, but you would have to be the wife for greater effect, maybe the father of the wife could work
Iv done far simpler tricks for far greater effect.
Extra challenge: tuck and roll into a death drop.
That's cool. I could never do that. I like my neck in the state it is.
remembering that people are entitled to their own opinions challenge: impossible
I actually really love the 2005 version the only thing thats wasnt good was presenting Wonkas backstory, he doesnt need one, hes supposed to be a mysterious morally ambiguous (not that ambiguous tho, since when you think about it more his morals are pretty clear). Parental neglect will not transform someone into a raging capitalist that exploites his workers, commits crimes againsf human rights and hurt children both intentionally and unintentionally.
So, thats kind of it, no backstorybfor Wonka
I heard the 2005 one followed the book more accurately tho
I think there’s one untapped aspect here that was glossed over: the Purpose for the Lottery.
Wonka was trying to find a “worthy” heir to his factory, fortune, and secrets. Sure, morality tale, yeah, and he’s not meant to be relatable, but also, he’s trying to leave one of the kids holding the bag while he flees-or a more charitable version: he realizes someone like him cannot exist so he’s trying to make up for all the terrible things he’s done to become what he is. Leave the problems-or gifts-to the next generation to fix/inherit.
Helps you understand his detachment from humanity too, as much as the 70's Willy Wonka doesn't respect the source material, I admire it as an independent piece of media.
I saw something online that I think describes the new Wonka movie exactly well. They hired a rabbit to play the role of a hare; for people who don't get the metaphor, hares are to rabbits like what coyotes are to dogs; not exactly feral, but as you get closer it gets clearer that something is wrong here. Gene Wilder's Wonka and Johnny Depp's Wonka, despite being two very different Wonkas, they're both different kinds of unhinged. Wilder's was a more of mad scientist while Depp's was more like the Michael Jackson of the candy world. They emit a kind of unnerving energy, that something is quite off about them but you can't quite tell what. From what we see so far with Timothy Chalomet, I don't really feel that kind of nervousness. If I had to pick an actor who could that sort of unnerving energy while also doing the spectacular showmanship of it, I would pick either Bo Burnham or Chris Fleming; which, while not being really renowned actors, but I feel like with how they each respectively are a bit unhinged the way they articulate and dictate.
Omg yes, I absolutely love both of your picks, ESPECIALLY Chris Fleming
Chris Fleming as Wonka is a downright enlightened idea.
Dave Franco is unnerving af
@@egg_bun_I'm familiar with this rabbit and hare analogy, I believe we got it from the same source. Thought it was a brilliant way to put it too, haha.
@@miscelaneasdealguem where did you get it from?
25:10 this would work so well in the context of an influencer Wonka because of the parents who let their kids be raised by social media instead of raising the kids themselves. Not just giving them whatever the spoiled kids want but also neglecting them to rather be practically raised by Wonka’s influence and ultimately being either exploited, or harmed because Wonka neither knows nor cares for the kids, he just wants them to keep buying his product. Like the kids trusting their favorite candy man who would let them drowned in a chocolate pool without batting an eye, like all the recent crypto scams from big influencers. Or even darker cases of influencers coercing things out of children besides money.
I think a Wonka prequel could work, but you would need an INSANELY creative writer to pull it off. Mainly when it comes to the bizarre backstories he has.
When it comes to Wonka's character, yes he should be a young adult brimming with creativity and determination to be the best at his craft, but at the same time, he NEEDS to have his negative traits on full display. Something like showing Wonka as an amazing prodigy, but also show him as a control freak who accepts nothing less than perfection.
Wonka was never portrayed as a young adult tho, which may be part of why people are so down on Timmy
He needs to grin cheerfully while handing out pink slips to his workers like he's giving them bonuses and they should be grateful. Then he should turn and skip to his office, humming cheerfully before calling security to remove the fired employees from the premises. And no, they're not allowed to collect their things. If they want their things, they'll need to dumpster dive later (until he gets the incinerator built and then... nope, that stuff's just gone).
That's the image in my head that I have of Wonka. The very image of "we're a family" and "work should be fun!" but at the same time, he's working his employees to the bone and firing them for insignificant little things - often things they had no control over.
To me it looks like they wanted to get more use out of the Fantastic Beasts sets and they took the lazy way out. And well done flipping the bird to the dwarfism community by mutating Hugh Grant instead of casting an actual dwarf actor. I bet Deep Roy would've been more than happy to reprise his role(s).
Yeah its really off putting that they did that
As a dwarf….you could not, if hypothetically I were to decide to go into acting, pay me to portray an Oompa Loopma. It’s right up there with being a Christmas Elf. These roles don’t allow dwarves to play real people, and that they’re still generally the best we can imagine for small actors is fucking depressing.
What a stupid comment. Talk about the "easy" was out. I hope you can see....... i am flipping the bird to you. Silly person.
@crowjane2168 yeah, it is. 😣
@@crow-jane well off people place such insane amounts of value of whats clearly always been state sponsored propaganda machines (entertainment "industry") ... whats worse, a handful of europeans making the entire species get tortured to death, or small people not having a bunch of easy high paying labor that produces products only the well off can consume? people are so dumb it hurts my soul
FFS, Hollywood just wont do anything new if its life depended on it.
I can see why you got so many dislikes - but I do appreciate your point of view; your discussion on Wonka was well thought out and engaging.
Where can you see the dislikes?
This is a mostly unrelated thought, but I think Wonka's abandoned factory would be a cool idea for a tabletop dungeon adventure. Like a survival horror themed game with investigators. Maybe some miasma mutated the candy and oompa loompas into monsters.
Don't paste an idea as good as that on the Internet for free! Make the game! I'll buy it ❤
I sent a screenshot to my DM, I think she'd love this idea
WOOO THIS THIS THISSSS
@@pringlebatch I was gonna run it in 5e as homebrew. I'm too scared to write an official adventure after the crap WOTC/Hasbro pulled a while ago 🤣
New call of chtulu campaign just dropped huh
Wonka is like The Wizard of Oz: a beloved children's movie that studios mistake for a potential franchise
Which is odd especially when you consider that there's a ton of Wizard of Oz books that haven't been adopted yet, and no Studio has yet to adapt the Charlie and the Chocolate Factory sequel book.
the wizard of oz would be an easy property to make a franchise out of if there wasn't a bunch of corporate drama around who owns the rights to which properties
@@kittykittybangbang9367Actually, I read somewhere, I'm not sure, that Roald Dahl hated the original adaptation so much, that he explicitly requested to NEVER adapt the sequel.
And are exclusively stuck on adapting only the first book, when the weirder sequels would be more fun.
Hollywood keeps making stuff up about Oz, instead of adapting the absolutely insane books
I just saw it and it' actually full of wimsy and joy in all the right ways, if you like that Paddington charm it works here too IMO
Even the idea of the golden ticket is a satire of capitalism.
Much of what drives success in capitalism is sheer probability- whether it’s wealth inheritance, risky investments, or the ups/downs of the market, capitalism is driven on a gamble where a select few win.
I’m so glad you mentioned the second book, I honestly have never heard anyone mention it when discussing these films. Why keep rehashing this same plot over and over when they have the means to explore a new story?
He wasn’t being serious.
@@ProfEngywook ?
@@johndoe35859 He was being sarcastic about that book because it’s a dumb story.
@@ProfEngywook and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory isn’t?
@@ProfEngywook I loved Charlie and the Great Glass Elevator! It had such interesting concepts and material to sift of Roal Dahl's world. At times I feel as though folks like you just didn't love his work such as I had. It's fine, but makes one feel sadder when there was so much to appreciate of it all, only to have it called a "dumb story" by those of your opinion.
Such words were to be enjoyed, with characters such as the whimsical Wonka talking all sorts of things related to space, the president, the minus zone, etc. If you wanted to be all "grown-up" oriented about it, why even bother with Dahl's work in the first place?
I like the original movie, because the movie is about Charlie and his experiences. Wonka is a symbol and only a symbol in the movie - a nuanced one to be sure, with a nasty dark side - which the newer versions don't do. They make Wonka the main character, when it makes more sense to go through the experience through a child's eyes, someone who is learning as they go, losing innocence.
To me, Johnny Depp's Willy Wonka will always be the best. I feel like he nailed the whimsical and weird part of the character and he seems to me like the closest to what Roald Dahl wanted out of a portrayal of the character. This seems nothing like Wily Wonka at all. He's supposed to be this mysterious, weird older man, not a young, bright guy. It literally takes away everything that is interesting about Willy Wonka in the first place. This is doomed to fail.
Everyone thinks it's a sequel when it's meant to be a prequel 😂
Gene Wilder is such a special performer. You can see discovery and plotting behind his eyes, there's always this sense of being tricked, and his whole presence is so embodied and curious. "What will he do next!?" is such a special element to him as an actor. He's so ALIVE. I always got the sense from him that he was a weird rich guy who was living his childhood dreams at the expense of everyone else. I also just think the music, especially "Pure Imagination" is so ominous and whimsical at the same time. He has a sense of drawing you in, wanting to look closer, to lean in and there's a scariness to it. It's such a complicated performance that's supported beautifully by the sounds in the world. There's something about Wonka that is funny and Gene Wilder is just a brilliant comedian, they need a comedian in the role, someone who really understands comedic timing in a physical way. I think Ryan Gosling would have been such an incredible choice, wow.
Gosling is funny, but I don't think he would change his body and then it would just be buff /hot wonka and that detracts too. Bringing back Lars type energy would help
You know he's dead, right
@@AmandaabnamA Gosling plays an absolute whimp in The Nice Guys, and he also gets a lot of physical comedy out of being a weak little manbaby (that bit when Russel Crow's character break his wrist is just comedy gold). And in La-la land he's a dimunutive music nerd. I think he could do Wonka.
Donald glover would’ve brought that unhinged comedian energy so easily
@@Pandemonioxo When Jack said his name i immediately thought about Teddy Perkins and just thought he'd be perfect
Roald Dahl hated the Wilder movie so much that he made it so the book's sequels couldn't be adapted.
I can see The Great Glass Elevator being done justice in a series. Not by the current IP holders of course, but it's possible.
Well that make sense with how weird Great Glass Elevator was.
I remember my freshman year of college some friends and I were sitting at lunch talking about media and Charlie And The Chocolate Factory came up and I mentioned GGE and I kid you not my one friends DID NOT believe me. She’s like “there’s no sequel??” And I was like “no there is!” And start explaining the plot, space, the Vermicious Knids and she wouldn’t believe me. She was convinced it was fanfiction lolol. Idk if she ever googled it to see but that convo stuck with me because of how vehemently she wouldn’t believe me and in retrospect like…yeah it SOUNDS total.y bizarre and not real. Like a fever dream.
@@elizabethlevesque6978the knids were terrifying when I read the book as a kid!
@@ofthewilderwoodsThat goes for everyone of his books they all have B movie joke horror elements, light horror elements, just plain old normal horror elements, and or extreme ultra horror elements that would scar most children.
gee, maybe there is some other reason Dahl hated Russian Jewish immigrant Gene Wilder playing his most famous character besides the acting
For me, Wonka is supposed to be old, he's supposed to be a bit not right in the head, he's supposed to be confusing, and you are not supposed to be able to read him. He has disassociated from himself, and to him, life feels like a lucid dream. He doesn't feel reality, because it doesn't exist to him, that's how he can wind up with slaves, but still punish a little kid for being greedy. It's almost as though he is living in a hallucination, but he's bringing it to life. Maybe this is just me and I was an odd child...
Sounds like the ideal Wonka film would have a tone similar to The Wachowski's Speed Racer, but with a more complex "villain."